DOCSLIB.ORG

Canada 1852 Sub-District Table

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canada 1852 Sub-District Table Estimated population by sub-district, Canada 1852 UPPER CANADA Sub-district names Estimated pop 1 Addington District 1 Amherst Island 1287 2 Camden 6975 3 Earnestown 5111 4 Sheffield 1792 Total of Addington 15165 2 Brant District 5 Brantford 6410 6 Brantford Town 3877 7 Burford 4433 8 Dumfries South 4297 9 Oakland 840 10 Onondaga 1858 11 Paris Village 1890 12 Tuscarora 1821 Total of Brant 25426 3 Bruce District 13 Arran 149 14 Brant 621 15 Bruce 100 16 Carrick 17 Culross not yet settled 18 Elderslie 14 19 Greenock 244 20 Huron 236 21 Kincardine 1149 22 Kinloss 47 23 Saugeen 277 Total of Bruce 2837 4 Carleton District 24 Fitzroy 2807 25 Gloucester 3005 26 Goulbourne 2525 27 Gower, North 1777 28 Huntley 2519 29 March 1125 30 Marlborough 2053 31 Nepean 3800 32 Osgood 3050 33 Richmond Village 434 34 Torbolton 542 Total of Carleton 23637 5 Dundas District 35 Matilda 4198 36 Mountain 2764 37 Williamsburg 4284 38 Winchester 2565 Total of Dundas 13811 6 Durham District 39 Cartwright 1756 40 Cavan 4438 41 Clarke 6190 42 Darlington 8005 43 Hope 5299 44 Manvers 2568 45 Port Hope, (Town) 2476 Total of Durham 30732 7 Elgin District 46 Aldborough 1226 47 Bayham 5092 48 Dunwich 1948 49 Dorchester 1477 50 Malahide 4050 51 Southwold 5063 52 Yarmouth 5288 53 St. Thomas, Village 1274 Total of Elgin 25418 8 Essex District 54 Anderdon 1199 55 Colchester 1870 56 Gosfield 1802 57 Maidstone 1167 58 Malden 1315 59 Mersea 1193 60 Rochester 788 61 Sandwich 4928 62 Amherstburg, Town 1880 63 Tilbury West 675 Total of Essex 16817 9 Frontenac District 64 Clarendon 65 Barrie 66 Kennebec 67 Palmerstone 68 Olden 69 Oso 70 Howe Island not settled 71 Kingston 5235 72 Loughborough 2003 73 Pittsburg 3258 74 Bedford 1118 75 Portland 2388 76 Hinchinbrooke 364 77 Storington 2130 78 Wolfe's Island 2654 Total of Frontenac 19150 10 Glengary District 79 Lancaster 4023 80 Charlottenburgh 5557 81 Lochiel 4174 82 Kenyon 3842 Total of Glengary 17596 11 Grey District 84 Artemesia 733 85 Bentick 1272 86 Collongwood 545 87 Derby 471 88 Egremont 665 89 Euphrasia 603 90 Glenelg 1250 91 Holland 954 92 Melancthon (Together with Proton) 450 93 Normanby 539 94 Osprey 486 95 Proton (Together with Melancton) 96 St. Vincent 1601 97 Sullivan 538 98 Sydenham 2432 99 Indian Territory 678 Total of Grey 13217 12 Grenville District 100 Augusta 5154 101 Edwardsburgh 4779 102 Gower, South 863 103 Oxford 4496 104 Wolfred 3259 105 Prescott, Town 2156 Total of Grenville 20707 13 Haldimand District 106 Canboro 1151 107 Cayuga, North 2013 108 Cayuga, South 825 109 Dunn 828 110 Moulton 1984 111 Oneida 2817 112 Rainham 1618 113 Sherbrooke 334 114 Seneca 3636 115 Walpole 3583 Total of Haldimand 18788 14 Halton District 116 Esquesing 5225 117 Trafalgar 6782 118 Nassagaweya 2237 119 Nelson 4078 Total of Halton 18322 15 Hastings District 120 Belleville, Town 4569 121 Huntingdon 2548 122 Madoc (Madoc, Elzivir, and Tudor are enumerated together) ….. 123 Elzivir 2761 124 Tudor ….. 125 Marmora 635 126 Rawdon 3097 127 Sidney 4574 128 Thurlow 4469 129 Tyendenaga 6200 130 Grimsthorpe ….. 131 Hungerford 3124 132 Lake ….. Total of Hastings 31977 16 Huron District 133 Hay 985 134 Stephen 742 135 McGillivray 1718 136 Biddulph 2081 137 Usborne 1484 138 Howich ….. 139 McKillop (McKillop and Grey are together in Section VI) 848 140 Grey (Grey Morris and Turbury are together in VIII) ….. 141 Morris ….. 142 Turnbury ….. 143 Ashfield 907 144 Wawanosh 722 145 Colborne 921 146 Hullett 955 147 Tuckersmith 1727 148 Stanley 2064 149 Goderich 2715 150 Goderich, Town 1329 Total of Huron 19198 17 Kent District 151 Camden (together with Zone in Section VI and VII) 1434 152 Chatham 1768 153 Dover, East (together with Dover, West in Section VI and VII and VIII) 154 Dover, West 1723 155 Harwich 2627 156 Howard 2798 157 Oxford (referred to as Orford and coupled with Howard in Section VI and VII and VIII) 1566 158 Raleigh 2460 159 Romney (together with Tilbury, East in Section VI and VII and VIII) 160 Tilbury, East 1023 161 Zone With Camden 162 Chatham, Town 2070 Total of Kent 17469 18 Lambton District 163 Bosanquet 1093 164 Brooke 511 165 Dawn 556 166 Enniskillen 238 167 Euphemia 1457 168 Moore 1258 169 Plympton 1511 170 Sarnia 1384 171 Sombra 738 172 Warwick 2069 Islands No return Total of Lambton 10815 19 Lanark District 173 Bathurst (together with Sherbrooke, Sud in Section VI) 2868 174 Sherbrooke, South 487 175 Beckwith 2540 176 Burgess, North 1110 177 Dalhousie (together with Sherbrooke, Nord, and Lavant in Section VI and VII, and together with just Sherbrooke, Nord in Section VIII) 1421 178 Sherbrooke, North 399 179 Lavant 98 180 Drummond 2648 181 Elmsley, North 2031 182 Lanark (together with Darling in Section VI) 2649 183 Darling 670 184 Montague 3356 185 Pakenham 1868 186 Ramsy 3256 187 Perth, Town 1916 Total of Lanark 27317 20 Leeds District 188 Bastard 3448 189 Burgess, South 276 190 Crosby, North 1785 191 Crosby, South 1578 192 Elizabethtown 5208 193 Elmsley 1442 194 Escott 1399 195 Kitley 3525 196 Leeds (together with Landsdowne in Section VI) 2283 197 Lansdowne 2439 198 Yonge 3661 199 Brockville,Town 3246 Total of Leeds 30280 21 Lennox District 200 Adolphustown 718 201 Fredericksburg 3166 202 Richmond 4071 Total of Lennox 7955 22 Lincoln District 203 Caistor 1398 204 Clinton 2462 205 Gainsborough 2538 206 Grantham 3216 207 Grimsby 2448 208 Louth 1848 209 Niagara 2250 210 Niagara, Town 3340 211 Ste. Catherines 4368 Total of Lincoln 23868 23 Middlesex District 212 Mosa 2075 213 Ekfrid 1792 214 Carradoc 3118 215 Metcalf 1096 216 Adelaide 1979 217 Williams 2290 218 Lobo 2447 219 Nissouri 1832 220 Dorchester 2570 221 Delaware 1861 222 Westminster 5069 223 London 6735 Total of Middlesex 32864 24 Northumberland District 224 Brighton 3725 225 Cramahe 2993 226 Haldimand 4634 227 Alnwick 836 228 Seymour 2781 229 Percy 2605 230 Hamilton (together with Cobourg, Town in Section VI) 5008 231 Monaghan, South 1051 232 Murray 3725 233 Cobourg, Town 3871 Total Northumberland 31229 25 Norfolk District 234 Houghton 1509 235 Middleton 1721 236 Charlotteville 2780 237 Windham 2900 238 Townsend 4935 239 Woodhouse 2894 240 Walsingham 3090 241 Long Point (together with Ryerson and Simcoe in Section VII) ….. 242 Ryerson's Island ….. 243 Simcoe, Town 1452 Total of Norfolk 21281 26 Ontario District 244 Whitby 7996 245 Pickering 6737 246 Uxbridge 2289 247 Reach 3897 248 Brock 3518 249 Thorah 1146 250 Mara (together with Rama in Section VI and VII) 251 Rama 1403 252 Scugog 415 253 Scott 1028 254 Georgina 1005 255 Oshawa 1142 Total of Ontario 30576 27 Oxford District 256 Zorra, East 3200 257 Zorra, West 3302 258 Oxford, North 1378 259 Oxford, East 2210 260 Oxford, West 1894 261 Dereham 3644 262 Norwich 5239 263 Blenheim 4995 264 Blandford 1356 265 Nissouri, East 2118 266 Woodstock, Town 2112 267 Ingersol, Town 1190 Total of Oxford 32638 28 Peel District 268 Albion 4281 269 Caledon 3707 270 Chinquacousy 7469 271 Toronto 7539 272 Toronto, Gore 1820 Total of Peel 24816 29 Perth District 273 Blanchard 2780 274 Hibbert 1191 275 Fullarton 1750 276 Downie (together with Downie, Gore in Section VI and VIII) 277 Downie, Gore 2727 278 Logan 698 279 Ellice 1328 280 Easthope, North 2341 281 Easthope, South 1797 282 Elma (together with Wallace in Section VI) 283 Wallace 284 Mornington 933 Total of Perth 15545 30 Peterboro District 285 Belmont 248 286 Burleigh included in Dummer 287 Douro 1676 288 Dummer 1600 289 Harvey with Smith only 4 or 5 inhabitants 290 Methuen with Belmont 291 Smith 2392 292 Monaghan 905 293 Asphodel 1678 294 Ennismore 675 295 Otonabee 3872 296 Peterboro, Town 2191 Total of Peterboro 15237 31 Prescott District 297 Caledonia 958 298 Hawkesbury (Called Hawkesbury West in Section VII) 2665 299 Hawkesbury, East 3029 300 Longueuil (together with Alfred in Section VI) 1406 301 Alfred 584 302 Plantagenet, North 1202 303 Plantagenet, South 643 Total of Prescott 10487 32 Prince Edward District 304 Ameliasburg 3286 305 Athol 1621 306 Hallowell 3203 307 Hillier 2963 308 Marysburg 3512 309 Sophiasburg 2734 310 Picton, Town 1569 Total of Prince Edward 18887 33 Renfrew District 311 Admaston 685 312 Bagot 734 313 Blitchfield 200 314 Bromley 687 315 Horton 1142 316 Ross 708 317 McNab 1513 318 Westmeath 1152 319 Pembroke 633 320 Stafford 281 321 Brougham 438 322 Grattan 554 323 Wilberforce 688 Total of Renfrew 9415 34 Russell District 324 Cumberland 1659 325 Clarence (together with Cambridge and Russell in Section VI) 508 326 Cambridge 200 327 Russell 503 Total of Russell 2870 35 Simcoe District 328 Adjala 1994 329 Essa 1507 330 Flos 545 331 Gwillimbury 3894 332 Innisfil 2341 333 Medonte 1116 334 Mono 2689 335 Mulmur 766 336 Nottawasaga 1887 337 Orillia and Matchedash 725 338 Oro 2027 339 Sunnidale 203 340 Tay 600 341 Tecumseth 3998 342 Tosoronto 492 343 Tiny 748 344 Vespra 626 345 Barrie, Town 1007 Total of Simcoe 27165 36 Stormont District 346 Cornwall 4707 347 Osnabruck 4699 348 Finch 1450 349 Roxborough 2141 350 Cornwall, Town 1646 Total of Stormont 14643 37 Victoria District 351 Mariposa 3895 352 Ops 2512 353 Emily 2763 354 Eldon 1320 355 Fenelon 590 356 Bexley 6 357 Verulam 571 358 Sommerville ….. Total of Victoria 11657 38 Waterloo District 359 Dumfries, North 3476 360 Waterloo 7698 361 Wilmot 5297 362 Woolwich 3092 363 Wellesley 3546 364 Galt 2248 365 Preston, Village 1180 Total of Waterloo 26537 39 Wellington District 366 Erin 3590 367 Puslinch 3862 368 Guelph 2879 369 Guelph, Town 1860 370 Nichol 2450 371 Garafraxa 2083 372 Eramosa 2350 373 Peel 2435 374 Maryborough 994 375 Minto (together with Arthur and Luther in Section VI and VII and VIII)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mavis Dixon VAD Database.Xlsx
    County Durham Voluntary Aid Detachment workers, 1914-1919 www.durhamatwar.org.uk Surname Forename Address Role Further information Service from 2/1915 to 12/1915 and 7/1916 to 8/1917. 13th Durham Margaret Ann Mount Stewart St., V.A.H., Vane House, Seaham Harbour. Husband George William, Coal Lacey Nurse. Part time. 1610 hours worked. (Mrs) Dawdon Miner/Stoneman, son Benjamin. Born Felling c1880. Married 1901 Easington District – maiden name McElwee. Bon Accord, Foggy Furze, Service from 12/1915 to date. 8th Durham V.A.H., Normanhurst, West Ladyman Grace Cook. Part time. 2016 hours worked. West Hartlepool Hartlepool. Not in Hartlepool 1911. C/o Mrs. Atkinson, Service from 1915 to 1/1917. 17th Durham V.A.H., The Red House, Laidler Mary E Wellbank, Morpeth. Sister. Full time. Paid. Etherley, Bishop Auckland. Too many on 1911 census to get a safe Crossed out on the card. match. Service from 1/11/1918 to 1/4/1919. Oulton Hall (Officers’ Hospital), C/o Mrs J Watson, 39 High Waitress. Pay - £26 per annum. Full Laine Emily Leeds. Attd. Military Hospital, Ripon 6/1918 and 7/1918. Not in Crook Jobs Hill, Crook time. on 1911 census. 7 Thornhill Park, Kitchen helper. 30 hours alternate Service from 12/1917 to 2/1919. 3rd Durham V.A.H., Hammerton Laing E. Victoria Sunderland weeks. House, 4 Gray Road, Sunderland. Unable to trace 1911 census. Lake Frank West Park Road, Cleadon Private. Driver. Service from 30/2/1917 to 1919. Unable to trace 1911 census. 15 Rowell St., West Service from 19/2/1917 to 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • By Anne Millar
    Wartime Training at Canadian Universities during the Second World War Anne Millar Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctorate of Philosophy degree in history Department of History Faculty of Arts University of Ottawa © Anne Millar, Ottawa, Canada, 2015 ii Abstract This dissertation provides an account of the contributions of Canadian universities to the Second World War. It examines the deliberations and negotiations of university, government, and military officials on how best to utilize and direct the resources of Canadian institutions of higher learning towards the prosecution of the war and postwar reconstruction. During the Second World War, university leaders worked with the Dominion Government and high-ranking military officials to establish comprehensive training programs on campuses across the country. These programs were designed to produce service personnel, provide skilled labour for essential war and civilian industries, impart specialized and technical knowledge to enlisted service members, and educate returning veterans. University administrators actively participated in the formation and expansion of these training initiatives and lobbied the government for adequate funding to ensure the success of their efforts. This study shows that university heads, deans, and prominent faculty members eagerly collaborated with both the government and the military to ensure that their institutions’ material and human resources were best directed in support of the war effort and that, in contrast to the First World War, skilled graduates would not be heedlessly wasted. At the center of these negotiations was the National Conference of Canadian Universities, a body consisting of heads of universities and colleges from across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County Or Unitary Authority
    SAUID Exchange Name FTTC/P Available County or Unitary Authority EMABRIP ABBOTS RIPTON FTTC/P Now Huntingdonshire District SWABT ABERCYNON FTTC/P Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff SWAA ABERDARE FTTC Now Rhondda, Cynon, Taf - Rhondda, Cynon, Taff NSASH ABERDEEN ASHGROVE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBLG ABERDEEN BALGOWNIE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSBDS ABERDEEN BIELDSIDE FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSCTR ABERDEEN CULTER FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSDEN ABERDEEN DENBURN FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKNC ABERDEEN KINCORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSKGW ABERDEEN KINGSWELLS FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSLNG ABERDEEN LOCHNAGAR FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSNTH ABERDEEN NORTH FTTC Now Aberdeen City NSPRT ABERDEEN PORTLETHEN FTTC Now Aberdeenshire NSWES ABERDEEN WEST FTTC Now Aberdeen City WNADV ABERDOVEY FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWAG ABERGAVENNY FTTC Now Sir Fynwy - Monmouthshire SWAAZ ABERKENFIG FTTC Now Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr - Bridgend WNASO ABERSOCH FTTC/P Now Gwynedd - Gwynedd SWABD ABERTILLERY FTTC/P Now Blaenau Gwent - Blaenau Gwent WNAE ABERYSTWYTH FTTC/P Now Sir Ceredigion - Ceredigion SMAI ABINGDON FTTC & FoD Now Vale of White Horse District THAG ABINGER FTTC Now Guildford District (B) SSABS ABSON FTTC Now South Gloucestershire LCACC ACCRINGTON FTTC Now Hyndburn District (B) EAACL ACLE FTTC Now Broadland District CMACO ACOCKS GREEN FTTC & FoD Now Birmingham District (B) MYACO ACOMB FTTC & FoD Now York (B) LWACT ACTON FTTC Now Ealing London Boro SMAD ADDERBURY FTTC Now Cherwell District LSADD ADDISCOMBE FTTC Now Croydon London Boro MYADE ADEL FTTC & FoD
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A
    RASM 1935-E(A) GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-0. DUFRESNE, Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. McGerrigle QUEBEC REDEMPTI PARADIS PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON. Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-O. DUFRESNE. Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. MeGerrigle QUEBEe RÉDEMPTI PARADIS • PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS by H. W. McGerrigle TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 Scope of report and method of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Summary 6 Previous work . 7 Bibliography 9 DESCRIPTION OF PLACER LOCALITIES 11 Ascot township 11 Felton brook 12 Grass Island brook . 13 Auckland township. 18 Bury township .. 19 Ditton area . 20 General 20 Summary of topography and geology . 20 Table of formations 21 IIistory of development and production 21 Dudswell township . 23 Hatley township . 23 Horton township. 24 Ireland township. 25 Lamhton township . 26 Leeds township . 29 Magog township . 29 Orford township . 29 Shipton township 31 Moe and adjacent rivers 33 Moe river . 33 Victoria river 36 Stoke Mountain area .
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Land Use in Terrebonne County, Québec Peter B
    Document généré le 2 oct. 2021 23:59 Cahiers de géographie du Québec Changing Land Use in Terrebonne County, Québec Peter B. Clibbon Volume 8, numéro 15, 1963 Résumé de l'article Le comté de Terrebonne, situé directement au nord-ouest de la ville de URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/020460ar Montréal, enjambe la zone de contact entre les basses terres du Saint-Laurent DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/020460ar et le plateau accidenté des Laurentides. Dans la zone des basses terres s'étendent de vastes superficies de sols argileux fertiles dont la plus grande Aller au sommaire du numéro partie fut colonisée pour des fins agricoles dès le début du XIXe siècle. La terre arable de qualité est beaucoup plus rare sur les hautes terres du plateau. Seules les grandes vallées fluviales, particulièrement celles des rivières du Éditeur(s) Nord et du Diable, en rassemblent des étendues de quelque importance. Ces sols fertiles de vallée furent défrichés et convertis à l'agriculture tout au début Département de géographie de l'Université Laval de l'occupation du territoire. Quant aux parties du plateau offrant le moins d'intérêt, parce que dotées d'un relief assez rude, de sols sablonneux et d'une ISSN courte saison de croissance, elles firent également l'objet, durant la deuxième moitié du XIXe siècle, d'une colonisation vigoureuse sous l'impulsion de l'Eglise 0007-9766 (imprimé) et de l'Etat. Les terres défrichées, généralement tout au plus propres à la 1708-8968 (numérique) culture de foin de médiocre qualité et au pâturage des moutons, furent progressivement abandonnées : vers la fin des années 30, la plus grande partie Découvrir la revue de ces terres étaient en voie d'être réoccupées par la forêt.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Le-Street/Durham
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review DISTRICT OF CHESTER LE STREET; CITY OF DURHAM LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION fc'Oll ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell FRIGS FSVA MEMBERS Lady Ackner Mr T Brockbank DL Professor G E Cherry Mi- K J L Newell Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT BACKGROUND 1. In a letter dated 20 March 198! the Chester-le-Street District Council invited us to make proposals for certain changes to the boundary of their district with the district of the City of Durham. The suggestion for changes had arisen during the course of the review by the District Council of the parish pattern in their area and involved the parishes of Plawsworth and Sacriston. Durham City Council had not at that stage completed their own parish review, but it was clear that the changes concerned were not supported by them or by the councils of the three parishes in their district which would be involved - Framwellgate Moor, Kimblesworth and Witton Gilbert. We decided to defer action on the matter until we had received Durham City Council's parish review report. ?., In submitting their report in August 1982 Durham City Council opposed all the district boundary changes suggested by Chester-le-Street District Council; Kimblesworth Parish Council wrote to us separately to emphasise their opposition to the ones affecting then. The City Council sent us a copy of a letter from the Durham County Council, however, which said, in relation to the possibility of changes in th^ Kimblesworth Parish boundary, that the Council considered that the villages of Kimblesworth and Nettlesworth (the latter currently in Plawsworth Parish, Chester-le-Street) should be treated as one settlement and that future development should be in relation to a single local plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident County Incident Unitary Incident District Air Env
    Event No. Reported Date Incident Operational Region Incident Operational Area Grid Ref (Confirmed) Incident County Incident Unitary Incident District Air Env. Impact Level Land Env. Impact Level Water Env. Impact Level 846879 02/01/2011 Anglian Region Eastern - Anglian TQ 66434 97092 ESSEX COUNTY BASILDON DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 846894 02/01/2011 Anglian Region Eastern - Anglian TL 82512 22196 ESSEX COUNTY BRAINTREE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847227 04/01/2011 North East Region North East NZ 24003 72931 NORTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847235 04/01/2011 Midlands Region Central - Midlands SK 35427 00150 LEICESTERSHIRE COUNTY HINCKLEY AND BOSWORTH DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847343 05/01/2011 North East Region Yorkshire SE 25000 19878 KIRKLEES DISTRICT Category 3 (Minor) Category 3 (Minor) Category 3 (Minor) 847387 05/01/2011 North East Region North East NZ 28110 71717 NORTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) Category 4 (No Impact) 847450 05/01/2011 South West Region Devon and Cornwall SX 00120 60440 CORNWALL COUNTY RESTORMEL DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847839 06/01/2011 South West Region Wessex ST 78973 14684 DORSET COUNTY NORTH DORSET DISTRICT Category 4 (No Impact) Category 3 (Minor) Category 4 (No Impact) 847919 07/01/2011 Midlands Region Central - Midlands
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oxford Architectural Survey Update
    City of Oxford Architectural Survey Update Photo courtesy of granvillemuseum.org Prepared by hmwPreservation 2018 Principal Investigator: Heather Wagner Slane Photography, Field & Research Assistance: Cheri LaFlamme Szcodronski 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project History and Overview .................................................................................................. 4 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................... 5 Historic Context ....................................................................................................................... 7 Architectural Context ............................................................................................................. 20 Findings ................................................................................................................................. 25 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 30 Bibliography .......................................................................................................................... 50 Appendix A: Classifications of Surveyed Properties ............................................................. 52 Appendix B: List of Newly Surveyed Properties ................................................................... 53 2 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 100 block Main Street .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C 6 Representation Act Ontario
    Ontario: Revised Statutes 1937 c 6 Representation Act Ontario © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1937 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso Bibliographic Citation Representation Act , RSO 1937, c 6 Repository Citation Ontario (1937) "c 6 Representation Act," Ontario: Revised Statutes: Vol. 1937: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso/vol1937/iss1/10 This Statutes is brought to you for free and open access by the Statutes at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ontario: Revised Statutes by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. 74 Chap. 6. REPR£SEXTATIO:-:. Sec. 1. SECTION III. LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY AND ELECTIONS. CHAPTER 6. The Representation Act. Boundaries to be th088 1. Notwithstanding anything in any general or special Act e:detlnS" "t puslng of the oounuariL'S of any county, terriwrial district, city, town, Act. village or township shall for the purposes of this Act be deemed to be the boundaries of such county, territorial district, city, lawn, village or township as defined by statute, by-law, proclamation or other lawful authority at the time of the passing of this Act. 1933, c. 56, s. 2. :-lumber or representa.­ 2. The Legislative Assembly of Ontario shall consist of tlves. ninety members. 1933, c. 56, s. 3. Dlvlelon of PrO\'lnce 3. The Province of Ontario shall for the purpose of repre­ Into electoral sentation in the Assembly be divided into electoral districts districts. as enumerated and defined in schedule A to this Act and for each of such electoral districts one member shall be returned to tile Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • 00MC Norfolk Agricultural Census 1844, 1848, 1850 Microfilm
    22/07/2020 ShelfNumber Title 00MC Norfolk Agricultural Census 1844, 1848, 1850 Microfilm 00MC 1851 Oxford County C975 Microfilm 00MC 1851 East Zorra, West Zorra, County of Oxford C973 Microfilm 00MC 1851 Oxford County C974 Microfilm 00MC 1851 Brant County C11714 Microfilm 00MC 1851 Brant County C11713 Microfilm 00MC 1851 Yarmouth Township C11719 Microfilm 00MC 1851 West Oxford, Dereham, Norwich, Blenheim C11745 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Oxford Agricultural Census C1062 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Blenheim, Dereham, Embro, Ingersoll, East Nissouri, North Norwich, South Norwich 00MC 1861 Ontario County. Oxford County: Blandford, Blenheim C1059 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Brant County: Brantford, Brantford Township C1008 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Brant County: Burford, Dumfries, Oakland, Brantford C1009 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Brant County: Brantford C1010 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Norwich South, Oxford North, East, West, Woodstock, Zorra East, West C1061 Microfilm 00MC 1861 Yarmouth Township C1019 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Brant County C9914 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Brant County C9914 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Brant County C9915 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Brant County C9916 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Oxford County C610 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Oxford County C9910 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Oxford County and Brant County C9912 - 5 Microfilm 00MC 1871 Oxford County C9913 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Oxford County C13267 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Tillsonburg C13263 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Blandford, Blenheim C13268 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Dereham, Tillsonburg C13266 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Brant C13264 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Brant C13263 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Elgin C13265 Microfilm 00MC 1881 Elgin C13266 Microfilm 00MC 1891 Elgin (T?) Microfilm 00MC 1891 Brant T6325 Microfilm 00MC 1891 Brant T6326 Microfilm 00MC 1891 Brant (T?) Microfilm 22/07/2020 ShelfNumber Title 00MC 1891 Nippising and Norfolk T6355 Microfilm 00MC 1891 Oxford T6360 Microfilm 00MC 1891 Oxford T6361 Microfilm 00MC 1910 Washington: Walla Walla T621-1673 Microfilm 00MC 1901 Nippising, Norfolk T06484 Microfilm 00MC Collector's Rolls 855009 M141 Microfilm 00MC Wesleyan Methodist Baptismal Registers Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • AC Buchanan and the Megantic Experiment
    A. C. Buchanan and the Megantic Experiment: Promoting British Colonization in Lower Canada J. I. LITTLE* Between 1829 and 1832 a British settler colony was established on the northern fringe of Lower Canada’s Eastern Townships, in what became known as Megantic county. The main aim of the chief instigator and manager of the project, “emigrant” agent A. C. Buchanan, was to demonstrate the viability of state-assisted “pauper” colonization, as long advocated by Colonial Under- Secretary Robert Wilmot-Horton. Buchanan’s project was successful insofar as he convinced over 5,300 immigrants, the majority of whom were Irish Protestants, to follow the Craig and Gosford roads to the uninhabited northern foothills of the Appalachians. But the British government failed to apply this “experiment” elsewhere in Lower or Upper Canada, and the British settler community did not expand far beyond the townships of Leeds, Inverness, and Ireland because of their isolation from external markets. Instead, French-Canadian settlers moved into the surrounding townships, with the result that the British-origin population became a culturally isolated island of interrelated families that slowly disappeared due to out-migration. De 1829 à 1832, une colonie de peuplement britannique a vu le jour au Bas- Canada, en périphérie nord des cantons de l’Est, dans ce qui deviendra le comté de Mégantic. L’instigateur et chef du projet, l’agent d’émigration A. C. Buchanan, avait pour objectif premier de prouver la viabilité, avec le soutien de l’État, de la colonisation par les « pauvres » que préconisait depuis longtemps le sous- secrétaire aux Colonies Robert Wilmot-Horton.
    [Show full text]
  • Inuit Identities in Montreal, Canada Nobuhiro Kishigami
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 6:18 p.m. Études/Inuit/Studies Inuit identities in Montreal, Canada Nobuhiro Kishigami Perspectives inuit et qallunaat : points de vue en interaction Article abstract Inuit and Qallunaaq perspectives: Interacting points of view As Dorais (1994) has indicated, the distinction between the concepts of cultural Volume 26, Number 1, 2002 and ethnic identities are important for us to understand the identities of contemporary Canadian Inuit Although the Inuit themselves do not distinguish URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/009279ar between these identities, I consider them to be useful analytical concepts. I DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/009279ar argue that cultural identity is a tool for an Inuk to live with his fellow Inuit in daily life and that ethnic identity is a political tool especially for both urban and arctic Inuit to deal with others in multi-ethnic situations. See table of contents Publisher(s) Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. ISSN 0701-1008 (print) 1708-5268 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this note Kishigami, N. (2002). Inuit identities in Montreal, Canada. Études/Inuit/Studies, 26(1), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.7202/009279ar Tous droits réservés © La revue Études/Inuit/Studies, 2002 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal.
    [Show full text]