DOCSLIB.ORG

Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin Project Id No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Consulting Services for Public Disclosure Authorized SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 DRINA RIVER BASIN ROOF REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December 2017 Public Disclosure Authorized Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 DRINA RIVER BASIN ROOF REPORT FINAL December 2017 PROJECT NO. A038803 DOCUMENT NO. 1 VERSION C DATE OF ISSUE December 2017 PREPARED JV COWI-Stucky-JCI team as in Inception Report CHECKED Nadja Zeleznik, REC APPROVED Roar Selmer Solland, COWI Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co‐managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. World Bank Drina River Basin - Roof Report Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin i Table of Contents Page No Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. viii 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Bosnia and Herzegovina .......................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Montenegro ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Republic of Serbia .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Other Reports .......................................................................................................................... 2 2 The Drina River Basin ................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Natural setting ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Geographic, topographic and geologic characterisation ......................................................... 4 2.1.2 Climate ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 The Drina River and its main tributaries .................................................................................. 7 2.1.4 Groundwater in the DRB.......................................................................................................... 8 2.1.5 Biodiversity and Protected areas ............................................................................................. 9 2.1.6 Expected climate change impacts ......................................................................................... 14 2.2 Socio-economic characteristics ..................................................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Natural resources .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.2 Demography .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Cultural heritage and monuments ........................................................................................ 19 2.3 Proposed development scenarios ................................................................................................. 20 2.3.1 Republic of Serbia .................................................................................................................. 25 2.3.2 Montenegro ........................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.3 Bosnia and Herzegovina ........................................................................................................ 30 2.3.4 Proposed integral development scenario for Drina River Basin............................................ 32 3 Water management ................................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Protection against adverse water effects ...................................................................................... 35 3.1.1 Flood control .......................................................................................................................... 35 3.1.2 Droughts ................................................................................................................................ 37 3.2 Use of water .................................................................................................................................. 38 3.2.1 Hydropower ........................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.2 Irrigation ................................................................................................................................ 40 3.2.3 Potable water ........................................................................................................................ 40 3.2.4 Industrial uses ........................................................................................................................ 41 3.2.5 Recreation .............................................................................................................................. 41 World Bank Drina River Basin - Roof Report Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin ii 3.2.6 Aquifers .................................................................................................................................. 41 3.3 Protection of water ....................................................................................................................... 42 3.3.1 Sediment management ......................................................................................................... 42 3.3.2 Environmental flow ............................................................................................................... 42 3.3.3 Water quality ......................................................................................................................... 44 3.3.4 Flora and fauna management ............................................................................................... 50 3.4 Monitoring ..................................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 55 3.4.2 Results presented in IWRM Country Reports ........................................................................ 55 3.4.3 Results presented in IPF Country Reports ............................................................................. 55 3.4.4 Proposed new monitoring stations ....................................................................................... 56 3.4.5 Conclusions related to monitoring ........................................................................................ 56 4 Specific issues ............................................................................................................................................. 58 4.1 Coherence of development scenarios ........................................................................................... 58 4.2 Transboundary issues .................................................................................................................... 58 4.2.1 Status, challenges and obstacles ........................................................................................... 58 4.2.2 Solutions ................................................................................................................................ 60 4.3 Legislation in the Field of Concessions .......................................................................................... 61 4.4 Possible financing sources for the implementation of measures and recommendations ............ 66 4.5 Links to other related projects ...................................................................................................... 67 4.6 Information to stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 68 5 Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................................... 70 5.1 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 70 5.2 Recommendations......................................................................................................................... 71 6 List
Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020

    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
  • Airac Aip Amdt

    Airac Aip Amdt

    SRBIJA / CRNA GORA AIRAC AIP SERBIA / MONTENEGRO KONTROLA LETENJA SRBIJE I CRNE GORE SMATSA doo BEOGRAD / AMDT SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES SMATSA llc 6/21 SLUŽBA ZA VAZDUHOPLOVNO INFORMISANJE / AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICE Trg Nikole Pašića 10, P.B. 640, 11000 Beograd, Serbia, AFS: LYBBYOYX 6 MAY TEL: + 381 11 321 8056, 321 8051 FAX: + 381 11 324 0456 e-mail: [email protected] Stupa na snagu / Effective Date 17 JUN 21 1. Sadržaj 1. Contents 1.1 Lokacijski indikator: LYEV – Uvođenje 1.1 Location indicator: LYEV – Introduction 1.2 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Parking pozicije – Izmene 1.2 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: ACFT stands – Changes (prethodno objavljeno NOTAM-ima) (previously published by NOTAM) 1.3 AD BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla: Navigacioni postupci – 1.3 BEOGRAD/Nikola Tesla AD: Navigation procedures – Izmene Changes 1.4 Uređivačke izmene 1.4 Editorial changes 2. Uklonite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / 3. Uložite sledeće stranice 17 JUN 21 / On 17 JUN 21 remove the following pages: On 17 JUN 21 insert the following pages: GEN 0.2–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.4–1/6 17 JUN 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 20 MAY 21 GEN 0.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 28 JAN 21 GEN 2.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 20 MAY 21 GEN 3.2–11/14 17 JUN 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 22 APR 21 GEN 3.2–15/16 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 25 MAR 21 AD 2 LYBE 2.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.4–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 6.5–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.1–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–1/2 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 28 JAN 21 AD 2 LYBE 8.2–5/6 17 JUN 21 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 3 DEC 20 AD 2 LYBE 9.1–1/2 17 JUN 21 4.
  • I N D I C a T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi Od 9.12.2018. Do 14.12.2019

    I N D I C a T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi Od 9.12.2018. Do 14.12.2019

    Akcionarsko društvo za železnički prevoz putnika „Srbija Voz“, Beograd I N D I C A T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi od 9.12.2018. do 14.12.2019. godine B E O G R A D 2019. “Srbija Voz” a.d. zadržava pravo na izmenu podataka. Informacije o izmenama dostupne su na informativnim punktovima “Srbija Voz” a.d. Grafička obrada: Boban Suljić Dizajn korica: Borko Milojević Tiraž 1.530 primeraka SADRŽAJ A. INFORMATIVNI DEO .................................. 4 (štampan plavom bojom) B. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U MEĐUNARODNOM SAOBRAĆAJU .. 29 (štampan zelenom bojom) PREGLED SASTAVA I PERIODI SAOBRAĆAJA VOZOVA I DIREKTNIH KOLA U MEĐUNARODNOM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU .................................................................................... 30 C. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U UNUTRAŠNJEM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU ..................................................................................... 49 (štampan plavom bojom) Beograd Centar - Šid ....................................................................... 50 Ruma - Šabac - Loznica - Zvornik ................................................... 52 Novi Sad - Bogojevo - Sombor - Subotica ....................................... 53 Novi Sad - Vrbas - Sombor ............................................................. 55 Beograd (Beograd Centar) - Novi Sad - Subotica ........................... 56 Novi Sad - Orlovat stajalište – Zrenjanin .......................................... 62 Subotica - Senta - Kikinda ............................................................... 63 (Beograd Centar) - Pančevo Glavna - Zrenjanin
  • Return of the Wolves Implications of the Role of Top Predators in Terrestrial Ecosystems for the Return of Eurasian Wolf Canis Lupus Lupus to Western Europe

    Return of the Wolves Implications of the Role of Top Predators in Terrestrial Ecosystems for the Return of Eurasian Wolf Canis Lupus Lupus to Western Europe

    Anne M.G. Kwak Return of the wolves Implications of the role of top predators in terrestrial ecosystems for the return of Eurasian wolf Canis lupus lupus to Western Europe Author Anne M.G. Kwak Radboud University Nijmegen E-mail: [email protected] Education Master Biology, track Communities & Ecosystems Radboud University Nijmegen Faculty of Science Heyendaalseweg 135 6525 AJ Nijmegen Phone: 024-365 26 61 Fax: 024-355 34 50 Website: www.ru.nl/fnwi Supervisor Prof. dr. H. (Hans) de Kroon Institute for Water and Wetland Research Radboud University Nijmegen Date October 2013 SUMMARY In many terrestrial ecosystems in Western Europe today, top predators are absent (Terborgh et al., 1999). Since top predators are considered to be important for the structure of ecosystems and their biodiversity, the absence of such species might have large impacts on these systems. In this thesis I want to investigate how the absence of top predators has affected terrestrial ecosystem trophic structure and biodiversity. The focus on terrestrial ecosystems comes forth from the fact that the Eurasian wolf Canis lupus lupus is currently expanding its range throughout Western Europe (Chapron et al., 2003; Randi, 2011). Here, I investigate how species like the Eurasian wolf might affect our ecosystems when they spread further, and what the implications of these effects are for the management of our ecosystems and of the Eurasian wolf. Carnivores can be assigned the role of keystone species, where they create ecological boundaries that protect lesser competitors from exclusion (Miller et al., 2001). In this role of keystone species, carnivores are also capable of increasing plant biomass through their limiting effect on herbivore numbers, causing both plants and carnivores to flourish (Miller et al., 2001).
  • UNDP SRB PA.Pdf

    UNDP SRB PA.Pdf

    TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................... 4 1.1. Context, global significance, environmental, institutional and policy background ........ 4 1.2 Threats and root-causes ....................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Desired long-term vision and barriers to achieving it ....................................................... 7 1.4 Stakeholder analysis ............................................................................................................. 9 1.5 Baseline analysis .................................................................................................................. 10 PART II: STRATEGY ...................................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Project Rationale and Conformity to GEF Policies and Strategic Objectives .............. 13 2.2 Country Ownership: Country Eligibility and Country Drivenness ............................... 13 2.3 Design principles and strategic considerations ................................................................ 14 2.4 Project Objective, Outcomes and Outputs/Activities ...................................................... 15 2.5 Financial modality .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Indicators, Risks and Assumptions ..................................................................................
  • Rivers and Lakes in Serbia

    Rivers and Lakes in Serbia

    NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA Čika Ljubina 8, 11000 Belgrade Phone: +381 11 6557 100 Rivers and Lakes Fax: +381 11 2626 767 E-mail: [email protected] www.serbia.travel Tourist Information Centre and Souvenir Shop Tel : +381 11 6557 127 in Serbia E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA www.serbia.travel Rivers and Lakes in Serbia PALIĆ LAKE BELA CRKVA LAKES LAKE OF BOR SILVER LAKE GAZIVODE LAKE VLASINA LAKE LAKES OF THE UVAC RIVER LIM RIVER DRINA RIVER SAVA RIVER ADA CIGANLIJA LAKE BELGRADE DANUBE RIVER TIMOK RIVER NIŠAVA RIVER IBAR RIVER WESTERN MORAVA RIVER SOUTHERN MORAVA RIVER GREAT MORAVA RIVER TISA RIVER MORE RIVERS AND LAKES International Border Monastery Provincial Border UNESKO Cultural Site Settlement Signs Castle, Medieval Town Archeological Site Rivers and Lakes Roman Emperors Route Highway (pay toll, enterance) Spa, Air Spa One-lane Highway Rural tourism Regional Road Rafting International Border Crossing Fishing Area Airport Camp Tourist Port Bicycle trail “A river could be an ocean, if it doubled up – it has in itself so much enormous, eternal water ...” Miroslav Antić - serbian poet Photo-poetry on the rivers and lakes of Serbia There is a poetic image saying that the wide lowland of The famous Viennese waltz The Blue Danube by Johann Vojvodina in the north of Serbia reminds us of a sea during Baptist Strauss, Jr. is known to have been composed exactly the night, under the splendor of the stars. There really used to on his journey down the Danube, the river that connects 10 be the Pannonian Sea, but had flowed away a long time ago.
  • Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr

    Drina River Basin Nexus Assessment - Phase II National Consultation Meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr

    Drina River Basin nexus assessment - Phase II National Consultation meeting KTH – Royal Institute of Technology: Emir Fejzić Youssef Almulla Dr. Vignesh Sridharan Dr. Francesco Gardumi 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 1 Agenda Key questions Scenarios Approach The river basin Preliminary results Hydro power plant cascade 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 2 Key questions to be addressed in Phase II • What role can renewables (hydro and non-hydro) in the Drina basin play in achieving the UNFCCC Nationally Determined Contributions? • What benefits does an increased share of non-hydro RES bring in terms of GHG emissions reduction and reduced stress on hydro power especially considering the need for flood containment measures. o To what extent may hydro power plants provide environmental services (e.g. environmental flows and flood control), and what impact does that have on their potential generation? • What are the effects of climate induced variability on hydropower generation? • What role could non-hydro RES play if the proposed plans for HPP development in the DRB are executed? • What effects can the Emission Trading Scheme, as part of the EU integration pathway, have on hydro and non-hydro RES development in the riparian countries? • In which way can hydro and non-hydro RES be impacted by the implementation of energy efficiency measures (demand- and supply-side)? 28/12/2020 National Consultation meeting 3 Scenarios proposed in Phase II • Reference scenario o Current policies, including INDC • Carbon pricing scenario o Effects
  • Science Journals

    Science Journals

    RESEARCH ARTICLE EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS 2016 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed Whole-genome sequence analysis shows that two under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). endemic species of North American wolf are 10.1126/sciadv.1501714 admixtures of the coyote and gray wolf Bridgett M. vonHoldt,1 James A. Cahill,2 Zhenxin Fan,3 Ilan Gronau,4 Jacqueline Robinson,5 John P. Pollinger,5 Beth Shapiro,2 Jeff Wall,6 Robert K. Wayne5* Protection of populations comprising admixed genomes is a challenge under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), which is regarded as the most powerful species protection legislation ever passed in the United States but lacks specific provisions for hybrids. The eastern wolf is a newly recognized wolf-like species that is highly admixed and inhabits the Great Lakes and eastern United States, a region previously thought to be included in the geographic Downloaded from range of only the gray wolf. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has argued that the presence of the eastern wolf, rather than the gray wolf, in this area is grounds for removing ESA protection (delisting) from the gray wolf across its geographic range. In contrast, the red wolf from the southeastern United States was one of the first species pro- tected under the ESA and was protected despite admixture with coyotes. We use whole-genome sequence data to demonstrate a lack of unique ancestry in eastern and red wolves that would not be expected if they represented long divergent North American lineages.
  • Jadar Lithium Mine,Serbia

    Jadar Lithium Mine,Serbia

    2021 Jadar Lithium Mine, Serbia A Raw Deal ICT metal mining case study Author Zvezdan Kalmar, CEKOR Editing Emily Gray Design Milan Trivic Cover SN040288, Depositphotos Acknowledgements Association Protect Jadar and Rađevina Center for Ecology and Sustainable Development (Centar za ekologiju i održivi razvoj – CEKOR) is an environmental and development organisation. Apart from monitoring international financial institutions’ activities in Serbia, CEKOR is working on issues in the areas of transport, waste, biodiversity, genetically modified organisms (GMO) and making the city of Subotica sustainable. CEKOR is a member of CEE Bankwatch Network. Coalition for Sustainable Mining, Serbia (Koalicija za održivo rudarstvo u Srbiji – KORS) is an organisation that promotes the application of the strictest social and environmental standards for mining and mineral use in Serbia. CEE Bankwatch Network is the largest network of grassroots, environmental and human rights groups in central and eastern Europe. It monitors public finance institutions that are responsible for hundreds of billions of investments across the globe. Together with local communities and other NGOs Bankwatch works to expose their influence and provide a counterbalance to their unchecked power. About ICT and the mining-related work of CEE Bankwatch Network CEE Bankwatch Network has been monitoring mining projects in Europe and abroad for years. Bankwatch cooperates with the Make ICT Fair consortium, which seeks to reform the information and communication technology (ICT) manufacture and minerals supply chains and to improve the lives of workers and those impacted along different stages of the ICT supply chain. Our long-term cooperation with groups monitoring the impact of mining on people and environment as well as with communities directly affected by mines or smelters strengthens our conviction that the many negative impacts of mining must finally come under the proper scrutiny.
  • From Slovenian Farms Learn About Slovenian Cuisine with Dishes Made by Slovenian Housewives

    From Slovenian Farms Learn About Slovenian Cuisine with Dishes Made by Slovenian Housewives

    TOURISM ON FARMS IN SLOVENIA MY WAY OF COUNTRYSIDE HOLIDAYS. #ifeelsLOVEnia #myway www.slovenia.info www.farmtourism.si Welcome to our home Imagine the embrace of green 2.095.861 surroundings, the smell of freshly cut PEOPLE LIVE grass, genuine Slovenian dialects, IN SLOVENIA (1 JANUARY 2020) traditional architecture and old farming customs and you’ll start to get some idea of the appeal of our countryside. Farm 900 TOURIST tourism, usually family-owned, open their FARMS doors and serve their guests the best 325 excursion farms, 129 wineries, produce from their gardens, fields, cellars, 31 “Eights” (Osmice), smokehouses, pantries and kitchens. 8 camping sites, and 391 tourist farms with Housewives upgrade their grandmothers’ accommodation. recipes with the elements of modern cuisine, while farm owners show off their wine cellars or accompany their guests to the sauna or a swimming pool, and their MORE THAN children show their peers from the city 200.000 how to spend a day without a tablet or a BEE FAMILIES smartphone. Slovenia is the home of the indigenous Carniolan honeybee. Farm tourism owners are sincerely looking Based on Slovenia’s initiative, forward to your visit. They will help you 20 May has become World Bee Day. slow down your everyday rhythm and make sure that you experience the authenticity of the Slovenian countryside. You are welcome in all seasons. MORE THAN 400 DISTINCTIVE LOCAL AND REGIONAL FOODSTUFFS, DISHES AND DRINKS Matija Vimpolšek Chairman of the Association MORE THAN of Tourist Farms of Slovenia 30.000 WINE PRODUCERS cultivate grapevines on almost 16,000 hectares of vineyards.
  • Tara-Drina National Park

    Tara-Drina National Park

    Feasibility study on establishing transboundary cooperation in the potential transboundary protected area: Tara-Drina National Park Prepared within the project “Sustaining Rural Communities and their Traditional Landscapes Through Strengthened Environmental Governance in Transboundary Protected Areas of the Dinaric Arc” ENVIRONMENT FOR PEOPLE A Western Balkans Environment & Development in the Dinaric Arc Cooperation Programme Author: Marijana Josipovic Photographs: Tara National Park archive Proofreading Linda Zanella Design and layout: Imre Sebestyen, jr. / UNITgraphics.com Available from: IUCN Programme Office for South-Eastern Europe Dr Ivana Ribara 91 11070 Belgrade, Serbia [email protected] Tel +381 11 2272 411 Fax +381 11 2272 531 www.iucn.org/publications Acknowledgments: A Special “thank you” goes to: Boris Erg, Veronika Ferdinandova (IUCN SEE), Dr. Deni Porej, (WWF MedPO), Ms. Aleksandra Mladenovic for commenting and editing the assessment text. Zbigniew Niewiadomski, consultant, UNEP Vienna ISCC for providing the study concept. Emira Mesanovic Mandic, WWF MedPO for coordinating the assessment process. 2 The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWFMedPO and SNV concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, WWF MedPO and SNV. This publication has been made possible by funding from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Belgrade, Serbia in collaboration with WWFMedPO and SNV Copyright: © 2011 International Union for Conservation of Nature Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged.
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.