DOCSLIB.ORG

Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin Project Id No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin Project Id No Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 SERBIA– INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT November 2017 Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 SERBIA – INVESTMENT PRIORITISATION FRAMEWORK VOLUME 1 – MAIN REPORT November 2017 PROJECT NO. A038803 DOCUMENT NO. 1 VERSION C DATE OF ISSUE November 2017 PREPARED JV COWI-Stucky-JCI team as in Inception Report CHECKED Nadja Zeleznik, REC APPROVED Roar Selmer Solland, COWI Consulting Services for SUPPORT TO WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN THE DRINA RIVER BASIN PROJECT ID NO. 1099991 This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund under the Western Balkans Investment Framework. The views expressed herein are those of authors and can therefore in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Contributors to the European Western Balkans Joint Fund or the EBRD and the EIB, as co‐managers of the European Western Balkans Joint Fund. World Bank Serbia – Investment Prioritisation Framework Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin i Table of Contents Page No Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................. viii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Scope of Work and TOR .......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Layout of the Report ............................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Main issues of the public consultation ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Summary of main issues that influence development of water resources – key drivers ...................... 1-3 2 Setting core water management development targets – key objectives .............................................. 2-1 2.1 Provision of sufficient quantity of potable water ................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Provision of sufficient quantities of water for other economic needs ................................................... 2-2 2.3 Provision of sufficient quantities of hydroelectric energy ..................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Environmental protection ...................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4.1 Aquatic ecosystem .................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4.2 Water quality protection .......................................................................................................... 2-5 2.4.3 Provision of minimal environmental flow ................................................................................. 2-7 2.4.4 Alluvial and riparian ecosystems ............................................................................................... 2-8 2.4.5 Protected areas ......................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5 Reduction of adverse impacts of floods and droughts ........................................................................... 2-9 3 Inventory of Changes for DRB development .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Short term and Long term goals for DRB development ......................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Assessing Risk ......................................................................................................................................... 3-3 3.3 Financing and its influence on priorities ................................................................................................. 3-4 3.3.1 General aspects of hydropower plants financing ..................................................................... 3-4 3.3.2 Possible financing development alternatives for proposed scenarios ..................................... 3-4 3.3.3 Factors which affect the financing strategy .............................................................................. 3-5 3.4 Review of all documentation regarding water related investments ...................................................... 3-6 3.4.1 Water supply investments ........................................................................................................ 3-6 3.4.2 Biodiversity investments ........................................................................................................... 3-7 3.4.3 Protected area investments ...................................................................................................... 3-8 3.4.4 Waste water investments ......................................................................................................... 3-9 3.4.5 Waste landfills investments .................................................................................................... 3-10 3.4.6 Social investments .................................................................................................................. 3-10 3.4.7 Hydropower investments ....................................................................................................... 3-11 3.5 Technical and Economic Analysis ......................................................................................................... 3-13 World Bank Serbia – Investment Prioritisation Framework Support to Water Resources Management in the Drina River Basin ii 3.5.1 Technical Analysis ................................................................................................................... 3-13 3.5.2 Economic Analysis ................................................................................................................... 3-14 3.5.3 HPP Investment Input Data ..................................................................................................... 3-15 3.5.4 Operation and maintenance costs .......................................................................................... 3-15 3.5.5 Results from the Financial Analysis ......................................................................................... 3-17 3.5.6 Economic analysis methodology ............................................................................................. 3-17 3.5.7 Results of the economic analysis ............................................................................................ 3-21 3.6 Prioritisation and effect on development strategies ............................................................................ 3-21 3.7 Prepare inventory of significant changes ............................................................................................. 3-22 3.8 Hydropower Review ............................................................................................................................. 3-23 3.9 Short review of mini HPP and their influence ...................................................................................... 3-23 3.10 Recommendations for Hydropower operation concessions ................................................................ 3-24 3.11 Effect of infrastructure on floods ......................................................................................................... 3-26 3.12 Analysis of Environmental and Social Impact of investments .............................................................. 3-29 3.12.1 Methodology (for environment and social criteria) ............................................................... 3-30 3.12.2 Definition of the environmental impacts ................................................................................ 3-31 3.12.3 Definition of the social impacts .............................................................................................. 3-43 3.12.4 Environmental and social impact assessment for the future investments options ............... 3-49 3.12.5 Preliminary mitigation measures ............................................................................................ 3-54 3.13 SEA Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 3-59 3.13.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3-59 3.13.2 National Legislative requirements for SEA.............................................................................. 3-59 3.13.3 Relevant European Legislation for SEA ................................................................................... 3-60 3.13.4 Relevant International Treaties for SEA .................................................................................. 3-61 3.13.5 Proposed methodology ..........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Republic of Serbia Ipard Programme for 2014-2020
    EN ANNEX Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection Republic of Serbia REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IPARD PROGRAMME FOR 2014-2020 27th June 2019 1 List of Abbreviations AI - Artificial Insemination APSFR - Areas with Potential Significant Flood Risk APV - The Autonomous Province of Vojvodina ASRoS - Agricultural Strategy of the Republic of Serbia AWU - Annual work unit CAO - Competent Accrediting Officer CAP - Common Agricultural Policy CARDS - Community Assistance for Reconstruction, Development and Stabilisation CAS - Country Assistance Strategy CBC - Cross border cooperation CEFTA - Central European Free Trade Agreement CGAP - Code of Good Agricultural Practices CHP - Combined Heat and Power CSF - Classical swine fever CSP - Country Strategy Paper DAP - Directorate for Agrarian Payment DNRL - Directorate for National Reference Laboratories DREPR - Danube River Enterprise Pollution Reduction DTD - Dunav-Tisa-Dunav Channel EAR - European Agency for Reconstruction EC - European Commission EEC - European Economic Community EU - European Union EUROP grid - Method of carcass classification F&V - Fruits and Vegetables FADN - Farm Accountancy Data Network FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization FAVS - Area of forest available for wood supply FOWL - Forest and other wooded land FVO - Food Veterinary Office FWA - Framework Agreement FWC - Framework Contract GAEC - Good agriculture and environmental condition GAP - Gross Agricultural Production GDP - Gross Domestic Product GEF - Global Environment Facility GEF - Global Environment Facility GES
    [Show full text]
  • I N D I C a T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi Od 9.12.2018. Do 14.12.2019
    Akcionarsko društvo za železnički prevoz putnika „Srbija Voz“, Beograd I N D I C A T E U R K U R S B U C H Važi od 9.12.2018. do 14.12.2019. godine B E O G R A D 2019. “Srbija Voz” a.d. zadržava pravo na izmenu podataka. Informacije o izmenama dostupne su na informativnim punktovima “Srbija Voz” a.d. Grafička obrada: Boban Suljić Dizajn korica: Borko Milojević Tiraž 1.530 primeraka SADRŽAJ A. INFORMATIVNI DEO .................................. 4 (štampan plavom bojom) B. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U MEĐUNARODNOM SAOBRAĆAJU .. 29 (štampan zelenom bojom) PREGLED SASTAVA I PERIODI SAOBRAĆAJA VOZOVA I DIREKTNIH KOLA U MEĐUNARODNOM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU .................................................................................... 30 C. RED VOŽNJE VOZOVA U UNUTRAŠNJEM PUTNIČKOM SAOBRAĆAJU ..................................................................................... 49 (štampan plavom bojom) Beograd Centar - Šid ....................................................................... 50 Ruma - Šabac - Loznica - Zvornik ................................................... 52 Novi Sad - Bogojevo - Sombor - Subotica ....................................... 53 Novi Sad - Vrbas - Sombor ............................................................. 55 Beograd (Beograd Centar) - Novi Sad - Subotica ........................... 56 Novi Sad - Orlovat stajalište – Zrenjanin .......................................... 62 Subotica - Senta - Kikinda ............................................................... 63 (Beograd Centar) - Pančevo Glavna - Zrenjanin
    [Show full text]
  • „Duboko“ U Užicu, Na Životnu Sredinu
    STUDIJA O PROCENI UTICAJA , REGIONALNE SANITARNE DEPONIJE „DUBOKO“ U UŽICU, NA ŽIVOTNU SREDINU Studiju izradio Drago Projekt, Beograd Beograd, septembar 2005. godine Studija o proceni uticaja , regionalne sanitarne deponije „Duboko“ u Užicu, na životnu sredinu Naziv elaborata: Studija o proceni uticaja, regionalne sanitarne deponije «Duboko» u Užicu, na životnu sredinu Nosilac projekta: Javno preduzeće »Direkcija za izgradnju« Užice Ulica Vukole Dabića 1-3, Užice Tel.031/521-328, email:[email protected] Obrađivač studije: DRAGO PROJEKT – Beograd, Autori analize: Slavica Petkovski, dipl.ing.tehnol. Mr. Milosav Rajković dipl.ing.građ. Zorica Matić dipl.inž.arh. Vlado Petkovski, dipl.ing.el. Direktor, Vlado Petkovski, dipl.ing.el. Drago Projekt, Beograd - 2 - Studija o proceni uticaja , regionalne sanitarne deponije „Duboko“ u Užicu, na životnu sredinu U skladu sa odredbama Zakona o proceni uticaja na životnu sredinu (Sl.gl.RS 135/04) i Pravilnika o analizi uticaja objekata, odnosno radova na životnu sredinu (Sl.gl. RS 61/92) I Z J A V LJ U J E M Da sam izradu studije o proceni utucaja, regionalne sanitarne deponije „Duboko“ u Užicu, vršila u skladu sa važećim zakonskim propisima, standardima i normativima koji se odnose na pojedine oblasti. Odgovorni projektant: Slavica Petkovski, dipl. inž.tehnolog Direktor Vlado Petkovski, dipl.ing.el. Drago Projekt, Beograd - 3 - Studija o proceni uticaja , regionalne sanitarne deponije „Duboko“ u Užicu, na životnu sredinu U skladu sa odredbama Zakona o proceni uticaja na životnu sredinu (Sl.gl.RS 135/04) i Pravilnika o analizi uticaja objekata, odnosno radova na životnu sredinu (Sl.gl. RS 61/92) I Z J A V LJ U J E M Da sam izradu studije o proceni utucaja, regionalne sanitarne deponije „Duboko“ u Užicu, vršio u skladu sa važećim zakonskim propisima, standardima i normativima koji se odnose na pojedine oblasti.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja Provided Their Contributions Both in English and Serbian
    Environment and sustainable rural tourism in four regions of Serbia Southern Banat.Central Serbia.Lower Danube.Eastern Serbia - as they are and as they could be - November 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Impressum PUBLISHER: TRANSLATORS: Th e United Nations Environment Marko Stanojević, Jasna Berić and Jelena Programme (UNEP) and Young Pejić; Researchers of Serbia, under the auspices Prof. Branko Karadžić, Prof. Milica of the joint United Nations programme Jovanović Popović, Violeta Orlović “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Lovren, Vojislavka Šatrić and Jelena Development” (2010 – 2012) Beronja provided their contributions both in English and Serbian. EDITORS: Jelena Beronja, David Owen, PROOFREADING: Aleksandar Petrović, Tanja Petrović Charles Robertson, Clare Ann Zubac, Christine Prickett CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS: Prof. Branko Karadžić PhD, GRAPHIC PREPARATION, Prof. Milica Jovanović Popović PhD, LAYOUT and DESIGN: Ass. Prof. Vladimir Stojanović PhD, Olivera Petrović Ass. Prof. Dejan Đorđević PhD, Aleksandar Petrović MSc, COVER ILLUSTRATION: David Owen MSc, Manja Lekić Dušica Trnavac, Ivan Svetozarević MA, PRINTED BY: Jelena Beronja, AVANTGUARDE, Beograd Milka Gvozdenović, Sanja Filipović PhD, Date: November 2012. Tanja Petrović, Mesto: Belgrade, Serbia Violeta Orlović Lovren PhD, Vojislavka Šatrić. Th e designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Moreover, the views expressed do not necessarily represent the decision or the stated policy of the United Nations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Acknowledgments Th is publication was developed under the auspices of the United Nations’ joint programme “Sustainable Tourism for Rural Development“, fi nanced by the Kingdom of Spain through the Millennium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDGF).
    [Show full text]
  • Tendencies Related to the Production of Raspberries in the Republic of Serbia
    TENDENCIES RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF RASPBERRIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Original scientific paper Economics of Agriculture 1/2013 UDC: 634.711(497.11) TENDENCIES RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF RASPBERRIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Nataša Kljajić1, Predrag Vuković2, Slavica Arsić3 Summary Raspberry for its biological characteristics, economic importance, agro-ecological, technological, organizational and other requirements, the market value of the product, as well as very high interdependence and interdependence between the various phases of reproductive cycle, specific fruit species. He is one of the most important types of berries in the world, and is one of the most profitable crops in the overall crop production. By production volume, Serbia is among the leading producers of raspberries, and its economic significance is very high level of market sells and market competitiveness of the European Union. Accordingly, the paper presents the production season in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2000-2010 its average, minimum and maximum of values in production, changes in rates and coefficients of variation. Key words: raspberry, production, economic importance. JEL: Q13, Q11 Introduction The most significant production for the economy of our country within fruit production is the production of berrylike fruit (strawberries, raspberries, blackberries, blueberries, cranberries, gooseberries) since an annual turnover realized with the export of this fruit, and first of all the export of raspberries, is more than 120 million of euros (Kljajic, 2012.). Raspberry (Rubus idaeus L.) is the most important kind of berry-like fruit. Growing raspberries has a very long tradition in our country, longer than a century.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for Urgent Maintenance and Remedy of Damages on State Road IB Class, No
    Beograd, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 282 tel: +381 11 30 40 700 fax: +381 11 30 40 699 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN for Urgent maintenance and remedy of damages on State Road IB Class, No. 26 Beograd - Sabac - Mali Zvornik section: Banja Koviljaca - Mali Zvornik km 0 + 000 to km 14 + 150 L = 14.150 km - Environmental Category B - BELGRADE, August 2015, Draft Document 1 State Road of the IB Class, No. 26, Section: B. Koviljaca - M. Zvornik, 20150826 Environmental Management Plan - EMP, DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 3. BASELINE CONDITIONS ASSESSED DURING ROUTE SURVEY 4. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 5. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. A. MITIGATION PLAN B. MONITORING PLAN C. INSTITUTIONAL IMPLEMENTATION AND REPORTING ARRANGEMENTS 6. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT - INFORMATION DISCLOSURE, CONSULTATIONS AND PARTICIPATION 7. REFERENCE APPENDICES I EMP - MITIGATION PLAN II EMP - MONITORING PLAN III RELEVANT SERBIAN LEGISLATION IV STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND PUBLIC CONSULTATION V CONDITION AND APPROVALS AND THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTATIONS FROM THE RELEVANT PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS 2 State Road of the IB Class, No. 26, Section: B. Koviljaca - M. Zvornik, 20150826 Environmental Management Plan - EMP, DRAFT ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic CEP Contractor’s Environmental Plan EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIB European Investment Bank EMP Environmental Management Plan HSE Health, Safety and Environment IFIs International Financing Institutions INP Institute for Nature Protection of the Republic of Serbia IPCM Institute for Protection of Cultural Monuments of the Republic of Serbia MoAEP Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection MoT Ministry of Transport (fmr.
    [Show full text]
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • ZAKON O NAKNADAMA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA ("Sl
    ZAKON O NAKNADAMA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 95/2018, 49/2019 i 86/2019 - usklađeni din. izn.) I UVODNE ODREDBE Predmet uređivanja Član 1 Ovim zakonom uređuju se naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara, i to: obveznik plaćanja, osnovica, visina, način utvrđivanja i plaćanja, pripadnost prihoda od naknade, kao i druga pitanja od značaja za utvrđivanje i plaćanje naknada za korišćenje javnih dobara. Definicije Član 2 Pojedini izrazi upotrebljeni u ovom zakonu imaju sledeće značenje: 1) naknada je javni prihod koji se naplaćuje za korišćenje određenog javnog dobra; 2) javno dobro je prirodno bogatstvo, odnosno dobro od opšteg interesa i dobro u opštoj upotrebi (u daljem tekstu: javno dobro); 3) korišćenje javnog dobra, u smislu ovog zakona, podrazumeva neposredno korišćenje javnog dobra na osnovu zakona ili ugovora ili vršenje neposrednog uticaja na raspoloživost, kvalitet ili neku drugu osobinu javnog dobra činjenjem ili nečinjenjem; 4) obveznik plaćanja naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra je pravno lice, preduzetnik ili fizičko lice (u daljem tekstu: obveznik naknade) koje koristi javno dobro; 5) osnovica za utvrđivanje naknade za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: osnovica) je jedinica mere, vrednost dobra koje se koristi ili prihod koji se ostvaruje; 6) visina naknade je novčani iznos za korišćenje javnog dobra (u daljem tekstu: visina naknade). Uvođenje naknada Član 3 Naknade za korišćenje javnih dobara mogu se uvoditi samo ovim zakonom. II VRSTE NAKNADA ZA KORIŠĆENJE JAVNIH DOBARA Vrste naknada Član 4 Ovim
    [Show full text]
  • ROADS of SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When You Want to Develop an Area, Equip It with Good Roads”, Prof
    INTRODUCTION ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE PE “ROADS OF SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When you want to develop an area, equip it with good roads”, prof. dr Milan Vujanić says and I entirely agree with this. Interdependence of industry and roads is quite evident because roads, in addition to their main function concerning the transport of people and goods, also generate growth and development of all places through which the road network passes as well as all other which are indirectly connected with motorways and other important routes in the Republic of Serbia. Thus it is the main dedication of the PE “Roads of Serbia” to achieve what is expected from us – to successfully finish all investments and provide the same level of quality of all the roads in Serbia with constant increase of the level of traffic safety, with cordial assistance of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. This is an imperative of our work, not only because of the expectations in front of us regarding the accession to the European Union, but also because good roads are one of the pillars of every serious and modern country. Road towards the achievement of big results starts with the devotion of individuals, each one of us. Owing to an exceptional devotion of the employees in the PE “Roads of Serbia”, achievement of the adopted plans is possible, regardless of the difficulties and not always favourable work conditions which the time sets upon us. Daily perseverance, devotion and openness of our employees to new knowledge and changes is obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Plan upravljanja rizicima od poplava u slivu rijeke Save Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN UPRAVLJANJA RIZICIMA OD POPLAVA U SLIVU RIJEKE SAVE - NACRT PROSINAC 2018. Verzija 2.1 Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN UPRAVLJANJA RIZICIMA OD POPLAVA U SLIVU RIJEKE SAVE Naslov dokumenta: Plan upravljanja rizicima od poplava u slivu rijeke Save Naručitelj: Investicijski okvir za Zapadni Balkan / Svjetska banka Korisnici: Institucije Stranaka potpisnica Okvirnog sporazuma o slivu rijeke Save iz Bosne i Hercegovine, Srbije, Hrvatske i Slovenije, institucije iz Crne Gore, Međunarodna komisija za sliv rijeke Save Konzultant: Eptisa Servicios de Ingeniería S.L. (Španjolska) PLAN UPRAVLJANJA RIZICIMA OD POPLAVA U SLIVU RIJEKE SAVE IZJAVA O OGRANIČENJU ODGOVORNOSTI Ovaj dokument je pripremljen uz financijsku potporu Zajedničkog europskog fonda za Zapadni Balkan, kao dio Investicijskog okvira za Zapadni Balkan. Stavovi iskazani u ovom dokumentu su stavovi autora i stoga se ni na koji način ne mogu smatrati stavovima ili zvaničnim mišljenjem partnerskih institucija Zajedničkog europskog fonda za Zapadni Balkan, kao ni EBRD i EIB, kao su- upravljačkih institucija Zajedničkog europskog fonda za Zapadni Balkan. Plan upravljanja rizicima od poplava u slivu rijeke Save (Sava FRMP) zasniva se na podacima koje su pružile Stranke Okvirnog sporazuma o slivu rijeke Save (Bosna i Hercegovina, Republika Hrvatska, Republika Srbija i Republika Slovenija), kao i Crne Gore koja se aktivnostima Savske komisije priključila potpisivanjem Memoranduma o razumijevanju o suradnji između Međunarodne komisije za sliv rijeke Save i Crne Gore 9. prosinca 2013. u Beogradu1. Tamo gdje je to bilo potrebno, iskorišteni su i drugi izvori podataka. Izvori korišteni povrh nadležnih tijela jasno su naznačeni u planu.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Plan of Action (Epoa) Serbia: Floods
    P a g e | 1 Emergency Plan of Action (EPoA) Serbia: Floods DREF Operation n° MDRRS014 Glide n°: FF2020-00158-SRB Expected timeframe: 4 months Date of issue: 10 July 2020 Expected end date: 30 November 2020 Category allocated to the of the disaster or crisis: Yellow DREF allocated: CHF 313,953 Total number of people affected: 52,745 Number of people to be 20,256 assisted: Provinces affected: 24 Provinces targeted: 20 Host National Societypresence (n° of volunteers, staff, branches): Red Cross of Serbia (RCS) with 222 volunteers and 83 staff in the branches of Arilje, Blace, Cacak, Despotovac, Doljevac, Gornji Milanovac, Ivanjica, Koceljeva, Kosjeric, Krusevac, Kursumlija, Lucani, Majdanpek, Osecina, Pozega, Prokuplje, Zitoradja, Kraljevo, Ljubovija, Trstenik, Krupanj, Obrenovac, Bajina Basta, Vladimirci. Red Cross Red Crescent Movement partners actively involved in the operation: N/A Other partner organizations actively involved in the operation: Sector for emergency of the Ministry of Interior, members of the Municipal Emergency Response headquarters (municipal emergency services), Serbian Armed Forces, local public companies. A. Situation analysis Description of the disaster For two weeks before the date of the disaster, which occurred on 22-24 June, the Republic of Serbia was affected by heavy rainfalls. The most affected areas are Kolubarski, Moravicki, Raski, Zlatiborski, Rasinski, Toplicki, Jablanicki, and Pomoravski districts. 8 municipalities and cities reported on 22 June that were affected by heavy rain that caused flash floods and floods. It was reported that the municipalities of Osecina, Ljubovija, and Lucani are the most affected by heavy rain (more than 40 litres per square meter in 24 hours) leading to floods in the whole region.
    [Show full text]