The Korean Military Balance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Korean Military Balance Military Korean The The Korean Military Balance comparative korean forces and the forces of key neighboring states 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Author Anthony H. Cordesman Cordesman With Andrew Gagel, Varun Vira, Alex Wilner, and Robert Hammond July 2011 ISBN 978-0-89206-632-2 Ë|xHSKITCy066322zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS The Korean Military Balance comparative korean forces and the forces of key neighboring states Anthony H. Cordesman With Andrew Gagel, Varun Vira, Alex Wilner, and Robert Hammond July 2011 About CSIS At a time of new global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to decisionmakers in government, international institutions, the private sector, and civil society. A bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways for America to sustain its prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent international policy institutions, with more than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focused on defense and security, regional stability, and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S. senator Sam Nunn became chairman of the CSIS Board of Trustees in 1999, and John J. Hamre has led CSIS as its president and chief executive officer since 2000. CSIS does not take specific policy positions; accordingly, all views expressed herein should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). Cover photo: South China Sea—Republic of Korea marines assault a landing zone from the United States Marine Corps CH-46E Sea Knights, assigned to Marine Medium Helicopter Squadron (HMM) 265 (Reinforced), in the rice fields east of Manripo Beach, ROK, for Exercise Foal Eagle. U.S. Navy photo. © 2011 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved. ISBN 978-0-89206-632-2 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cordesman, Anthony H. The Korean military balance : comparative Korean forces and the forces of key neighboring states / Anthony H. Cordesman ; with the assistance of Andrew Gagel ... [et al.]. p. cm. “Revised: April 30, 2011.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-0-89206-632-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Korea (South)--Military policy. 2. Korea (North)-- Military policy. 3. Korea (South)--Armed Forces. 4. Korea (North)--Armed Forces. 5. East Asia-- Military policy. 6. East Asia--Armed Forces. 7. Balance of power--Case studies. 8. Escalation (Military science)--Case studies. 9. Korea (South)--Military relations--Korea (North) 10. Korea (North)--Military relations--Korea (South) I. Gagel, Andrew. II. Title. UA853.K6C67 2011 355'.0330519--dc23 2011019947 Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 Tel: (202) 887-0200 Fax: (202) 775-3199 Web: www.csis.org contents List of Figures vi Acknowledgments ix Executive Summary x Key Limits to the Data x The Resource, Arms Import, and Military Spending Balance xi The “Conventional” Warfare Balance xi The Asymmetric or Irregular Warfare Balance xiii The Nuclear and CBRN Warfare Balance xiv The Balance of Weapons of Mass Effectiveness and “Offensive” vs. “Defensive” Weapons xviii The Balance of Different Perceptions xviii 1. Korean and Northeast Asia Military Expenditures and Comparative Resources 1 East Asian Military Spending 1 DPRK Military Spending 1 DPRK and ROK Military Modernization 2 DPRK and ROK Capacity for Military Efforts 2 2. The Conventional Military Balance in the Koreas and Northeast Asia 19 Uncertain Patterns of Conflict and Escalation 20 Looking at Key Trends 22 Western Data from International Institute of Strategic Studies 22 Data from Korean Defense White Papers 24 Data from the Japanese White Paper for 2010 25 International Institute of Strategic Studies Conventional Force Estimates 26 Republic of Korea (ROK) Conventional Force Estimates 49 Government of Japan Conventional Force Estimates 64 3. US Forces in Korea and the Pacific 67 US Forces in Korea 67 US Forces in Japan and USPACOM 71 | iii 4. Special, Asymmetric, and Paramilitary Forces 81 Special and Asymmetric Forces 83 Paramilitary, Police, and Internal Security Forces 83 5. Counterterrorism, Terrorism, and Low-Level Asymmetric Warfare 100 6. Korean Missile and WMD Forces 103 DPRK Nuclear Developments 104 Weaponization 107 The Early Program 107 Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the 1993–1994 Crisis 108 The Collapse of the Agreed Framework (1994–2003) 109 Uranium Enrichment and Renewed Crisis 110 The October 2006 Test and 2007 Accords 112 The May 2009 Test 113 Facilities 114 Recent Developments 119 Probable Weaponization 120 DPRK Missile Developments 121 The Hwasŏng and Toksa Programs 125 The Nodong 125 The Taepogong Program 126 The Musudan 129 Facilities 130 DPRK Chemical/Biological Developments 133 Chemical 133 Biological 141 ROK Nuclear Developments 146 Initial Weapons Research 146 Reprocessing and Enrichment Activities 147 ROK Missile Developments 148 The Early Program—The NHK Program 149 The Hyunmu-3 Cruise Missile 149 ROK Space Programs 151 iv | the korean military balance ROK’s Chemical and Biological Developments 151 Chemical 151 Biological 152 7. The Broader Balance of WMD, Missile, and Strategic Forces 153 The Balance of Weapons of Mass Effectiveness 158 China and Strategic Asymmetric Warfare 158 The US and Extended Regional Deterrence 163 The Strategic “Offensive” Character of “Defensive” Weapons 164 anthony h. cordesman | v List of Figures Figure 1.1: Military Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP, 2000–2009 (SIPRI) 5 Figure 1.2: Defense Expenditures as a Percentage of GDP, 2006–2010 (IISS) 6 Figure 1.3: Military Expenditures by the Major Asian Powers, 2000–2010 (SIPRI) 7 Figure 1.4: Northeast Asian Defense Expenditures, 2000–2010 (IISS) 8 Figure 1.5: Northeast Asian Per Capita Defense Expenditures: 2007–2010 (IISS) 9 Figure 1.6: The DPRK Defense Budget 10 Figure 1.7: Military Modernization Trends on Korean Peninsula 11 Figure 1.8: Defense Reform 2020 (2005) Plans for ROK Modernization 14 Figure 1.9: ROK Mid-term Force Improvement Plan 17 Figure 1.10: Relocation of ROK Forces 18 Figure 2.1: Northeast Asian Military Manpower in 2011 26 Figure 2.2a: Army Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia 27 Figure 2.2b: Northeast Asian Modern Main Battle Tanks versus Total Holdings, 2011 29 Figure 2.2c: Northeast Asian Armored Fighting Vehicles, 2011 30 Figure 2.2d: Northeast Asian Modern AFVs (MBTs, APCs, AAVs, AIFVs) versus Total Holdings of Other Armored Vehicles, 2011 31 Figure 2.2e: Northeast Asian Artillery Strength, 2011 32 Figure 2.3a: Navy Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia 33 Figure 2.3b: Northeast Asian Naval Combat Ships, 2011 37 Figure 2.3c: Northeast Asian Naval Combat Ships by Category, 2011 38 Figure 2.3d: Northeast Asian Submarines by Type, 2011 39 Figure 2.4a: Air Force Manpower and Equipment in Northeast Asia 40 Figure 2.4b: Northeast Asian Fixed Wing Combat Aircraft by Branch, 2011 41 Figure 2.4c: Northeast Asian Fixed Wing Combat Aircraft by Type, 2011 42 Figure 2.4d: Northeast Asian Rotary Wing Combat Aircraft by Branch, 2011 43 Figure 2.4e: Northeast Asian Rotary Wing Aircraft by Type, 2011 44 Figure 2.4f: Northeast Asian Modern Air Force Combat Aircraft versus Total Combat Aircraft, 2011 45 Figure 2.5a: Korean and Northeast Asian Air/Missile Defenses 46 Figure 2.5b: Korean and Northeast Asian Air/Missile Defenses, 2011 47 Figure 2.5c: Northeast Asian Air Force Air Defenses, 2010 48 Figure 2.6a: ROK Estimate of Korean Force Balance in 2010: Manpower 49 Figure 2.6b: ROK Estimate of Korean Force Balance in 2010: Army 50 vi | the korean military balance Figure 2.6c: ROK Estimate of Korean Force Balance in 2010: Navy 51 Figure 2.6d: ROK Estimate of Korean Force Balance in 2010: Air Force 52 Figure 2.6e: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Balance in 2010: Manpower 53 Figure 2.6f: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Balance in 2010: Army 54 Figure 2.6g: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Balance in 2010: Navy 55 Figure 2.6h: ROK Estimate of Northeast Asian Force Balance in 2010: Air Force 56 Figure 2.6i: ROK Estimates of DPRK Military Manpower, 2010 57 Figure 2.6j: ROK Estimates of DPRK Army Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 57 Figure 2.6k: ROK Estimates of DPRK Navy Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 58 Figure 2.6l: ROK Estimates of DPRK Air Force Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 58 Figure 2.6m: ROK Estimates of ROK Army Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 59 Figure 2.6n: ROK Estimates of ROK Navy Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 59 Figure 2.6o: ROK Estimates of ROK Air Force Equipment Trends from 2004 to 2010 60 Figure 2.6p: ROK Diagram of DPRK Force Organization 61 Figure 2.6q: ROK Army Organization 62 Figure 2.6r: ROK Naval Organization 62 Figure 2.6s: ROK Air Force Organization 63 Figure 2.7a: Japanese Summary Estimates of Forces on the Korean Peninsula in 2010 64 Figure 2.7b: Japanese Estimates of Japanese Self-Defense Forces 65 Figure 2.7c: Japanese Estimates of Chinese Armed Forces in 2010 66 Figure 3.1: Japanese Estimates of US, ROK, and
Recommended publications
  • South Korea Section 3

    South Korea Section 3

    DEFENSE WHITE PAPER Message from the Minister of National Defense The year 2010 marked the 60th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Since the end of the war, the Republic of Korea has made such great strides and its economy now ranks among the 10-plus largest economies in the world. Out of the ashes of the war, it has risen from an aid recipient to a donor nation. Korea’s economic miracle rests on the strength and commitment of the ROK military. However, the threat of war and persistent security concerns remain undiminished on the Korean Peninsula. North Korea is threatening peace with its recent surprise attack against the ROK Ship CheonanDQGLWV¿ULQJRIDUWLOOHU\DW<HRQS\HRQJ Island. The series of illegitimate armed provocations by the North have left a fragile peace on the Korean Peninsula. Transnational and non-military threats coupled with potential conflicts among Northeast Asian countries add another element that further jeopardizes the Korean Peninsula’s security. To handle security threats, the ROK military has instituted its Defense Vision to foster an ‘Advanced Elite Military,’ which will realize the said Vision. As part of the efforts, the ROK military complemented the Defense Reform Basic Plan and has UHYDPSHGLWVZHDSRQSURFXUHPHQWDQGDFTXLVLWLRQV\VWHP,QDGGLWLRQLWKDVUHYDPSHGWKHHGXFDWLRQDOV\VWHPIRURI¿FHUVZKLOH strengthening the current training system by extending the basic training period and by taking other measures. The military has also endeavored to invigorate the defense industry as an exporter so the defense economy may develop as a new growth engine for the entire Korean economy. To reduce any possible inconveniences that Koreans may experience, the military has reformed its defense rules and regulations to ease the standards necessary to designate a Military Installation Protection Zone.
  • PARK JIN HYOK, Also Known As ("Aka") "Jin Hyok Park," Aka "Pak Jin Hek," Case Fl·J 18 - 1 4 79

    PARK JIN HYOK, Also Known As ("Aka") "Jin Hyok Park," Aka "Pak Jin Hek," Case Fl·J 18 - 1 4 79

    AO 91 (Rev. 11/11) Criminal Complaint UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the RLED Central District of California CLERK U.S. DIS RICT United States ofAmerica JUN - 8 ?018 [ --- .. ~- ·~".... ~-~,..,. v. CENT\:y'\ l i\:,: ffl1G1 OF__ CAUFORN! BY .·-. ....-~- - ____D=E--..... PARK JIN HYOK, also known as ("aka") "Jin Hyok Park," aka "Pak Jin Hek," Case fl·J 18 - 1 4 79 Defendant. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best ofmy knowledge and belief. Beginning no later than September 2, 2014 and continuing through at least August 3, 2017, in the county ofLos Angeles in the Central District of California, the defendant violated: Code Section Offense Description 18 U.S.C. § 371 Conspiracy 18 u.s.c. § 1349 Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud This criminal complaint is based on these facts: Please see attached affidavit. IBJ Continued on the attached sheet. Isl Complainant's signature Nathan P. Shields, Special Agent, FBI Printed name and title Sworn to before ~e and signed in my presence. Date: ROZELLA A OLIVER Judge's signature City and state: Los Angeles, California Hon. Rozella A. Oliver, U.S. Magistrate Judge Printed name and title -:"'~~ ,4G'L--- A-SA AUSAs: Stephanie S. Christensen, x3756; Anthony J. Lewis, x1786; & Anil J. Antony, x6579 REC: Detention Contents I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1 II. PURPOSE OF AFFIDAVIT ......................................................................1 III. SUMMARY................................................................................................3
  • North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020

    North Korea: a Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020

    North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 May 5, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46349 North Korea: A Chronology of Events from 2016 to 2020 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Chronology ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1994 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 1998 ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2003 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2005 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2006 ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2009 ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2011 ..........................................................................................................................................
  • General Assembly Security Council Seventy-First Session Seventy-Second Year Agenda Item 61 Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace

    General Assembly Security Council Seventy-First Session Seventy-Second Year Agenda Item 61 Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace

    United Nations A/71/843–S/2017/192 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 March 2017 Security Council Original: English General Assembly Security Council Seventy-first session Seventy-second year Agenda item 61 Peacebuilding and sustaining peace Identical letters dated 6 March 2017 from the Permanent Representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General and the President of the Security Council I have the honour herewith to transmit a letter with regard to aggressive joint military exercises staged by the United States and south Korea against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) from the date of 1 March 2017, in disregard of repeated warnings by the Government of DPRK and strong protests and condemnations from internal and external communities. These joint military exercises being staged by the United States in south Korea are the most undisguised nuclear war manoeuvres, to drive the Korean Peninsula and the rest of the North-East Asia region into nuclear disaster. This is to mention that all different kinds of strategic assets of the United States, not only nuclear propelled aircraft carriers but also nuclear submarines, nuclear strategic bombers and stealth fighters, are all massively enlisted in these joint military exercises, Key Resolve and Foal Eagle, to wage actual war drills in accordance with a nuclear pre-emptive plan to attack DPRK by surprise. Nobody could vouch whether, when the war drills kicked off after the introduction of a lot of nuclear strike means and huge forces into south Korea and the waters, it may go over to an actual war and, consequently, the situation on the Korean Peninsula is again inching to the brink of a nuclear war.
  • Assuring South Korea and Japan As the Role and Number of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Are Reduced

    Assuring South Korea and Japan As the Role and Number of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Are Reduced

    Assuring South Korea and Japan as the Role and Number of U.S. Nuclear Weapons are Reduced Michael H. Keifer, Project Manager Advanced Systems and Concepts Office Defense Threat Reduction Agency Prepared by Kurt Guthe Thomas Scheber National Institute for Public Policy January 2011 The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. This report is approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office Report Number ASCO 2011 003 Contract Number MIPR 10-2621M The mission of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) is to safeguard America and its allies from weapons of mass destruction (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high explosives) by providing capabilities to reduce, eliminate, and counter the threat, and mitigate its effects. The Advanced Systems and Concepts Office (ASCO) supports this mission by providing long-term rolling horizon perspectives to help DTRA leadership identify, plan, and persuasively communicate what is needed in the near term to achieve the longer-term goals inherent in the agency’s mission. ASCO also emphasizes the identification, integration, and further development of leading strategic thinking and analysis on the most intractable problems related to combating weapons of mass destruction. For further information on this project, or on ASCO’s broader research program, please contact: Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office 8725 John J. Kingman Road Ft. Belvoir, VA 22060-6201 [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................
  • Threading the Needle Proposals for U.S

    Threading the Needle Proposals for U.S

    “Few actions could have a more important impact on U.S.-China relations than returning to the spirit of the U.S.-China Joint Communique of August 17, 1982, signed by our countries’ leaders. This EastWest Institute policy study is a bold and pathbreaking effort to demystify the issue of arms sales to Taiwan, including the important conclusion that neither nation is adhering to its commitment, though both can offer reasons for their actions and views. That is the first step that should lead to honest dialogue and practical steps the United States and China could take to improve this essential relationship.” – George Shultz, former U.S. Secretary of State “This EastWest Institute report represents a significant and bold reframing of an important and long- standing issue. The authors advance the unconventional idea that it is possible to adhere to existing U.S. law and policy, respect China’s legitimate concerns, and stand up appropriately for Taiwan—all at the same time. I believe EWI has, in fact, ‘threaded the needle’ on an exceedingly challenging policy problem and identified a highly promising solution-set in the sensible center: a modest voluntary capping of annual U.S. arms deliveries to Taiwan relative to historical levels concurrent to a modest, but not inconsequential Chinese reduction of its force posture vis-à-vis Taiwan. This study merits serious high-level attention.” – General (ret.) James L. Jones, former U.S. National Security Advisor “I commend co-authors Piin-Fen Kok and David Firestein for taking on, with such skill and methodological rigor, a difficult issue at the core of U.S-China relations: U.S.
  • Ballistic, Cruise Missile, and Missile Defense Systems: Trade and Significant Developments, June 1994-September 1994

    Ballistic, Cruise Missile, and Missile Defense Systems: Trade and Significant Developments, June 1994-September 1994

    Missile Developments BALLISTIC, CRUISE MISSILE, AND MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEMS: TRADE AND SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS, JUNE 1994-SEPTEMBER 1994 RUSSIA WITH AFGHANISTAN AND AFGHANISTAN TAJIKISTAN AUSTRALIA 8/10/94 According to Russian military forces in Dushanbe, the 12th post of the Moscow INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS border troops headquarters in Tajikistan is INTERNAL DEVELOPMENTS attacked by missiles fired from Afghan ter- 9/27/94 ritory. The Russians respond with suppres- 7/94 Rocket and mortar attacks leave 58 people sive fire on the missile launcher emplace- It is reported that Australia’s University of dead and 224 wounded in Kabul. Kabul ment; no casualties are reported. Queensland can produce a scramjet air- radio attributes this attack to factions op- Itar-Tass (Moscow), 8/11/94; in FBIS-SOV-94-155, breathing engine, which may offer payload posing President Burhanuddin Rabbani. 8/11/94, p. 36 (4564). and cost advantages over conventional SLVs. More than 100 rockets and mortar shells Chris Schacht, Australian (Sydney), 7/20/94, p. 6; are fired on residential areas of Kabul by 8/27/94 in FBIS-EAS-94-152, 8/8/94, pp. 89-90 (4405). anti-Rabbani militia under the control of During the early morning hours, Tajik Prime Minister Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and Mujaheedin launch several missiles at the 7/94 northern warlord General Abdul Rashid Russian Frontier Guard observation posi- It is reported that the Australian government Dostam. tion and post on the Turk Heights in awarded Australia’s AWA Defence Industries Wall Street Journal, 9/28/94, p. 1 (4333). Tajikistan. The missiles are launched from (AWADI) a $17 million contract to produce the area of the Afghan-Tajik border and from the Active Missile Decoy (AMD) system, a Afghan territory, according to the second “hovering rocket-propelled anti-ship missile commander of Russian border guards in decoy system” providing for ship defense against sea-skimming missiles.
  • Study Series 21-03 (0824).Hwp

    Study Series 21-03 (0824).Hwp

    Study Series 21-03 North Korea’s College and University and Higher Education System in an ‘Era of Knowledge Economy’ Jeong-ah Cho Choon Geun Lee Hyun-suk Oum Study Series 21-03 North Korea’s College and University and Higher Education System in an ‘Era of Knowledge Economy’ Jeong-ah Cho Choon Geun Lee Hyun-suk Oum North Korea’s College and University and Higher Education System in an ‘Era of Knowledge Economy’ Printed August 2021 Published August 2021 Published by Korea Institute for National Unification (KINU) Publisher Yu-hwan Koh, President Editor Yeowon Lim, Research Associate Registration number No.2-2361 (April 23, 1997) Address 217 Banpo-daero(Banpo-dong), Seocho-gu, Seoul 06578, Korea Telephone (82-2) 2023-8208 Fax (82-2) 2023-8298 Homepage http://www.kinu.or.kr Design Seilfocus (82-2) 2275-6894 Print Seilfocus (82-2) 2275-6894 ISBN 979-11-6589-046-9 93340 : Not for sale Copyright ⓒ Korea Institute for National Unification, 2021 All KINU publications are available for purchase at all major bookstores in Korea. Also available at the Government Printing Office Sales Center Store (82-2) 734-6818; Office (82-2) 394-0337 North Korea’s College and University and Higher Education System in an ‘Era of Knowledge Economy’ This English translation is an abbreviated and edited version of Jeong-ah Cho et al., North Korea’s College and University and Higher Education System in an ‘Era of Knowledge Economy (Seoul: Korea Institute for National Unification, 2020). The analysis, comments, and opinions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Korea Institute for National Unification.
  • SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies

    SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies

    School of Oriental and African Studies University of London SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies No. 45 Producing Political Landscape on the Korean Peninsula: Divided Visions, United Vista Dr Robert Winstanley-Chesters & Ms Sherri L. Ter Molen May 2015 PRODUCING POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Producing Political Landscape on the Korean Peninsula: Divided Visions, United Vista Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters Beyond the Korean War Project (University of Cambridge) University of Leeds Ms. Sherri L. Ter Molen Wayne State University Author Note Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters is a Post-Doctoral Fellow of the Beyond the Korean War Project (University of Cambridge) and a Visiting Research Fellow at the School of Geography, University of Leeds. Sherri L. Ter Molen, A.B.D., is currently a Doctoral Candidate in the Department of Communication, Wayne State University. The research for this article and project has received generous support from the Academy of Korean Studies (AKS-2010-DZZ-3104). Correspondence this article should be addressed to Dr. Robert Winstanley-Chesters at [email protected]. 1 PRODUCING POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Abstract Myths of national construction and accompanying visual representations are often deeply connected to political narrative. The Korean peninsula may be unlike other political space due to the ruptured relations and sovereignty on its territory since World War II: North and South Korea. Nevertheless, both nations construct inverse ideologies with the common tools of the pen and lens and both produce highly coded,
  • Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike

    Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike

    (Image Source: Wired.co.uk) Able Archers Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike IAN EASTON September 2014 |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy in an Age of Precision Strike September 2014 About the Project 2049 Institute The Project 2049 Institute seeks to guide decision makers toward a more secure Asia by the century’s Cover Image Source: Wired.co.uk mid-point. Located in Arlington, Virginia, the organization fills a gap in the public policy realm Above Image: Chung Shyang UAV at Taiwan’s 2007 National Day Parade through forward-looking, region-specific research on alternative security and policy solutions. Its Above Image Source: Wikimedia interdisciplin ary approach draws on rigorous analysis of socioeconomic, governance, military, environmental, technological and political trends, and input from key players in the region, with an eye toward educating the public and informing policy debate. ii |Able Archers: Taiwan Defense Strategy and Precision Strike | Draft for Comment About the Author Ian Easton is a research fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, where he studies defense and security issues in Asia. During the summer of 2013 , he was a visiting fellow at the Japan Institute for International Affairs (JIIA) in Tokyo. Previously, he worked as a China analyst at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA). He lived in Taipei from 2005 to 2010. During his time in Taiwan he worked as a translator for Island Technologies Inc. and the Foundation for Asia-Pacific Peace Studies. He also conducted research with the Asia Bureau Chief of Defense News.
  • CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    CBD Strategy and Action Plan

    Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan DPRK ovata, Epimedium koreanum, Eleutherococcus Enticosus as medicinal; · Vitis amurensis, Actinidia argenta, Vaccinium uliginosum, Castanea crenata, Querecus sp._As nuts; · Spuriopinella calycina, Pteridium aquilinum, Osmunda japonica, Aralia elata, Platycodon grandifiorum as wild edible greens; · Trcholoma matsutake, 'Pleurotus ostreatus, P. cornucopiaen as mushroom resource; · Syringa dilatata, Thylgus quinque costatus, Agastache rugosa, Ledum palustre as spice plant. Endangered & rare species in Species inCITES Taxa DPRK Annexl Annex2 . Amphibian 9 Reptile 13 Aves 74 15 2 I Mammal 28 4 7 Total 124 19 28 As for forest wild animals with economic value, we can take Caprecolus caprecolus, Hydropotes inermis, Nemorhaedus goral, Sus scorfa, Lepus mandschuricus, Cervus nippon, Moschus moschiferus, Ursus thibetatnus, Meles meles, Nyctereutes procyonoides, Martes zibellina, Lutra lutra, Phsianus colchicus, Coturnix xoturnix, Tetrastes bonasia, Lyrurus tetrix. And in winter, ten thousands flocks of Anatidae fly along wetland at seaside of east and west seas. There distributed 185 species of fresh, brackish water and anadromous fishes including 65 species of Cyprinidae in freshwater. And are there 900 species of Disces and rich marine grasses and invertebrates with high industrial value such as Haliotis gigantea, Stichpus japonicus, Echinoidea, Erimaculus isenbeckii, Neptunus trituberculatus, Chionoecetes opilio in seawater of DPRK. In the KES, 329 species of Rhodophyta, 130 species of Rhaeophyta, 87 species of Chlorophta and in total 546 species of seaweeds are known. Among them, 309 species of seaweed have high economic values including 63 species with high medicinal value. 1.3 Threats to DPRK Biodiversity 1.3. L Threatened Status 1.3.1.1. Threatened status for ecosystem Destruction of ecosystems is being accelerated by natural disasters such as deforestation, soil erosion, deterioration of water quality, decrease of economic resources and also, flood.
  • PK2018-07-OCR.Pdf

    PK2018-07-OCR.Pdf

    CONTENTS Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Inspecting Δ Emphasis on Effective Use of Natural Energy. ............18 Completed Koam-Tapchon Railway ................................1 Δ Sanatorium at the Foot of Mt Ryongak ........................20 Δ Supreme Leader’s Field Guidance at Construction Δ Moran Hill, People’s Cultural Recreation Area ............22 Site of Wonsan-Kalma Coastal Tourist Area....................4 Δ Amateur Riders .............................................................26 Δ Effervescent DPRK-China Friendship .............................6 Δ 2018 Spring Table Tennis Tournament of Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Meeting the Disabled and Amateurs Held ..................................26 Chinese Foreign Minister ...............................................10 Δ Little Janggu Players ....................................................28 Δ Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un Meeting Δ Sinuiju Traffi c Safety Education US State Secretary. .........................................................11 Park for Children ..........................................................30 Δ Historic Fourth North-South Summit .............................12 Δ To Preserve National Soul and Flavour ........................32 Δ Gold Prizes Awarded to Δ Like Real Brothers and Sisters .....................................34 Kimilsungia and Kimjongilia.........................................14 Δ Laugh Heartily and Grow Up Happily .........................36 Δ Day of the Sun Celebrated Grandly ...............................15 Δ First Olympic Medallist