sign in sign up
<<
Home , Simple Lie algebra

arXiv:0811.2668v2 [math.AG] 10 Aug 2010 lsicto em tl a away. far still seems classification zdCra type Cartan ized i suorus ncharacteristic In in occurred pseudogroups. which Lie algebras, Lie simple complex dimensional hr soemr aiyo ipeLeagba aldMeliki called algebras Lie simple of family acteristic more one is there h nntsmldfrain ftegopshmso heigh of schemes group In the type. of Cartan deformations of infinitesimal algebras the is Lie this simple known that to show are We associated type field. schemes base classical the of of characteristic algebras bad Lie some to simple associated to schemes and group the The groups determining schemes. group of finite problem simple the address we paper vrteitgr n hnrdcn ouoteprime the modulo reducing then and characteri integers in the algebras Lie over simple the considering by tained cen last the of mathematics the of achievements greatest the h lsicto asta for that says classification The tesml i lershv encasfidol for only classified t been these have heig of algebras of classification Lie scheme The simple group (the the algebra. or restricted constan finite simple the (abstract) either simple types: a two of to be can field closed braically otiuino aymteaiin se[6,[7,[]fo [2] [27], [26], (see mathematicians many of contribution lsia yeado eeaie atntp.Tealgebras The type. Cartan generalized of and type classical 2 ntefis ato hsppr eso hta that show we paper, this of part first the In Introduction 1. o.x,x(xx,1–12 – 1 (xxxx), x xx, Vol. Torino Pol. Univ. Mat. Sem. Rend. , aercnl encasfidb Block-Wilson-Premet-Str by classified been recently have 3 ∗ atal upre yFTCêca08(Portugal). FCT-Ciência2008 by supported Partially rial lsdfil eue otecasfiaino abstr of classification the to reduces field closed braically Abstract. h nntsmldfrain fsml nt ru scheme group finite simple of a deformations we infinitesimal Finally, the classification. this review We characteristic positive classified. been in algebras Lie restricted simple fe asn nrve hs w lsicto eut,in results, classification two these review in passing After ipefiiegroups finite Simple ipeLealgebras Lie Simple IPEFNT RU CEE N THEIR AND SCHEMES GROUP FINITE SIMPLE p = 2 eso httecasfiaino ipefiiegopschemes group finite simple of classification the that show We , ,teeaemn xetoa ipersrce i algebra Lie restricted simple exceptional many are there 3, r h nt-iesoa nlge ftefu lse fi of classes four the of analogues finite-dimensional the are NIIEIA DEFORMATIONS INFINITESIMAL vra lerial lsdfield closed algebraically an over eecasfiddrn h er 9518 hnst the to thanks 1955-1985 years the during classified were p ≥ .Viviani F. p h ipeLeagba a eo w ye:of types: two of be can algebras Lie simple the 7 = ,aatfo h bv w ye falgebras, of types two above the from apart 5, 1 ipefiiegopscheme group finite simple ∗ ohteetosml bet have objects simple two these Both . nntsmldeformations infinitesimal destepolmo determining of problem the ddress c ipefiiegop n of and groups finite simple act s. p p 6= h lersof algebras The . tczr,b aigamodel a taking by zero, stic iehsoia account). historical nice a r okn fsml objects simple of kind wo tury. ru ceeassociated scheme group t 2 o h aefrtegroup the for case the not , atnscasfiainof classification Cartan’s of d se[] 2] [28]). [29], [5], (see ade atclrw determine we particular )wscranyamong certainly was 3) F n soitdt the to associated one t ipefiie(abstract) finite simple toeascae oa to associated one ht ob ii pr from apart rigid be to nagba.I char- In algebras. an lsia type classical fcharacteristic of h atpr fthis of part last the vra alge- an over vra alge- an over n the and s general- fsuch of nfinite- r ob- are p 6= 2 F. Viviani restricted simple Lie algebras of Cartan type. We do this by computing the second restricted cohomologygroup of these algebras with values in the . It remains an open problem to extend the above results to the other simple restricted Lie algebras.

2. Finite group schemes

Let k be a field of characteristic p ≥ 0. There are three equivalent ways to define a finite group scheme over k.

DEFINITION 2.1. A finite group scheme G over k can be defined equivalently as

(i) A finite scheme G which is a group object in the category of schemes;

(ii) Aschemeoftheform G = Spec(A), where A is a finite dimensional commutative k-Hopf algebra;

(iii) A scheme G whose functor of points FG takes values in finite groups, that is

FG : {k − schemes}→{finite groups}

S 7→ G(S) := Homk(S,G).

The following Theorem collects the basic structure of finite group schemes.

THEOREM 2.1. Let G be a finite group scheme over the field k.

(1) If char(k)= 0 then G is étale.

(2) If char(k)= p > 0 then there is a unique extension

1 → G0 → G → Get → 1

such that G0 is connected and Get is étale. If k is perfect then the above exact sequence splits, that is G = G0 ⋊ Get .

(3) If char(k)= p > 0 and G is connected, there is a minimal natural number n ≥ 1 n such that G = Ker(Fn) (it is called the height of G), where Fn : G → G(p ) is the the n-th iteration of the Frobenius map. In the filtration of normal closed subgroups: 1 ⊳ Ker(F) ⊳ Ker(F2) ⊳ ··· ⊳ Ker(Fn)= G0, each factor Ker(Fi+1)/Ker(Fi) has height one (i.e. it has vanishing Frobenius).

Proof. (1) By a result of Cartier, every k-group scheme is smooth if char(k)= 0 (see [34, Chap. 11.4]). Therefore every finite group scheme in characteristic zero is étale. Simple finite group schemes and their infinitesimal deformations 3

(2) The above exact sequence is obtained by taking G0 the connected component et of G containing the identity and G = Spec(π0(k[G])), where π0(k[G]) is the maximal separable sub-Hopf algebra of the algebra k[G] of regular functions on et G. If k is perfect, then G =∼ Spec(k[G]red ), where k[G]red is the maximal reduced quotient of k[G], which gives the splitting (see [34, Chap. 6]).

n (3) The kernel of Fn is represented by the Hopf algebra k[G]/(xp | x ∈ I), where I is the augmentation ideal of k[G] (that is, the maximal ideal corresponding to the origin of G). The first assertion follows from the fact that if G is connected then the augmentation ideal I is nilpotent. The second assertion is clear.

Therefore every finite group scheme can be realized as extensions of étale and height one finite group schemes (these latter occur only if char(k)= p > 0). Now we provide an explicit description of these two building blocks.

THEOREM 2.2. If k is algebraically closed the we have a bijection

{Étale k-group schemes} ←→{Finite (abstract) groups}

Proof. The bijection is realized explicitly as follows: to an étale k-group scheme G one associates the finite group G(k) of its k-points. Conversely, to an abstract finite group Γ one associates the finite group scheme whose k-Hopf algebra is the k-algebra kΓ of functions from Γ to k with comultiplication given by ∆(eρ)= ⊕ρ=σ·τeσ ⊗ eτ, where eρ is the function sending ρ ∈ Γ into 1 and the other elements of Γ to 0. One can check the above maps are one the inverse of the other (see [34, Chapter 6.4]).

In order to describe the finite group schemes of height one, we need to recall the definition of the restricted Lie algebras (sometimes called p-Lie algebras) over a field k of positive characteristic.

DEFINITION 2.2 ([17]). A L over a field k of characteristic p > 0 is said to be restricted (or a p-Lie algebra) if it is endowed with a map (called p-map) [p] : L → L, x 7→ x[p], which satisfies the following conditions:

1. ad(x[p])= ad(x)[p] for every x ∈ L.

2. (αx)[p] = αpx[p] for every x ∈ L and every α ∈ k.

[p] [p] [p] ∑p−1 3. (x0 + x1) = x0 + x1 + i=1 si(x0,x1) for every x,y ∈ L, where the element si(x0,x1) ∈ L is defined by 1 si(x0,x1)= − ∑adxu(1) ◦ adxu(2) ◦···◦ adxu(p−1)(x1), r u

the summation being over all the maps u : [1,··· , p − 1] →{0,1} taking r-times the value 0. 4 F. Viviani

The last two conditions in the above definition can be rephrased by saying that p [p] the map a 7→ a − a from L into the universal enveloping algebra UL is p-semilinear, p where a denotes the p-th self product of a in UL. We give examples of restricted Lie algebras.

EXAMPLE 2.1.

1. Let A an associative k-algebra, where char(k)= p > 0. Then the Lie algebra DerF A of k-derivations of A into itself is a restricted Lie algebra with bracket p [D1,D2]= D1 ◦ D2 − D2 ◦ D1 and p-map D 7→ D := D ◦···◦ D. 2. Let G a group scheme over k, where char(k)= p > 0. Then the Lie algebra Lie(G) associated to G is a restricted Lie algebra with respect to the p-map given by the differential of the homomorphism G → G, x 7→ xp := x ◦···◦ x.

The Lie algebra Lie(G) associated to a k-group scheme G in positive character- istic p (as in the aboveexample) dependsonly on the first height truncation Ker(F)⊳G of G. Indeed, we have the following

THEOREM 2.3. Let k be a field of characteristic p > 0. Then there is a bijection

{Restricted k-Lie algebras} ←→ {Finite k-group schemes of height one}

Proof. The bijection is realized explicitly as follows: to a finite group scheme G of height 1, one associates the restricted Lie algebra Lie(G) with p-map given by the differential of the map x 7→ xp. Conversely, to a restricted Lie algebra (L,[p]), one associates the finite groupscheme correspondingto the dual of the restricted enveloping Hopf algebra U[p](L) := U(L)/(xp −x[p]). Onecan check that the abovemap areinverse one of the other (see [11, Chapter 2.7]).

As a consequence of the structure theorems for finite group schemes discussed in this section, we get

COROLLARY 2.1. A simple finite group scheme over an algebraically closed field k is either the étale group scheme associated to a simple (abstract) finite group or (if char(k)= p > 0) the height one group scheme associated to a simple restricted Lie algebra.

Both these two simple objects have been classified (the last ones assuming that p 6= 2,3)!

3. Classification of simple finite groups

The simple finite groups are divided in four families:

• Cyclic groups Z/pZ with prime order; Simple finite group schemes and their infinitesimal deformations 5

• Alternating groups An, n ≥ 5;

• Simple groups of Lie type, including

– Classical groups of Lie type:

(1) An(q): The Projective PSLn+1(Fq). 2 2 F (2) An(q ): The Projective Special PSUn+1( q2 ), with Fn+1 respect to the Hermitian form on q2

n+1 Ψ q (w,v)= ∑ wi vi, i=1

where w = (w1,··· ,wn+1) and v = (v1,··· ,vn+1). (3) Bn(q): The subgroup O2n+1(Fq) of the special in dimension 2n + 1 formed by the elements having spinor norm 1. F (4) Cn(q): The projective PSp2n( q). + F (5) Dn(q): The subgroup O2n( q) of the projective special split orthogo- nal group in dimension 2n formed by the elements having spinor norm 1. 2 − F (6) Dn(q): The subgroup O2n( q2 ) of elements of spinor norm 1 in the projective special non-split orthogonal group in dimension2n. – Exceptional and twisted groups of Lie type, obtained via the Steinberg con- struction, starting with an automorphism of a and an au- 2 2n+1 tomorphism of a finite field. The resulting groups are called: B2(2 ), 3 3 2 2 2 2n+1 2 2n+1 D4(q ), (q), E6(q ), (q), (q), (q), F4(2 ), (q), G2(3 ) (see [7]).

• 26 sporadic groups (see [35]).

4. Classification of simple restricted Lie algebras

First of all, we show that there is a bijection between simple restricted Lie algebras, that is restricted Lie algebras without restricted ideals (i. e. ideals closed under the p-map), and simple Lie algebras (not necessarily restricted).

THEOREM 4.1. There is a bijection

{Simple restricted Lie algebras} ←→{Simple Lie algebras}.

Explicitly to a simple restricted Lie algebra (L,[p]) we associate its derived algebra [L,L]. Conversely to a M we associate the restricted subalgebra [p] M of DerF (M) generated by ad(M) (which is called the universal p-envelope of M). 6 F. Viviani

Proof. We have to prove that the above maps are well-defined and are inverse one of the other. • Consider a simple restricted Lie algebra (L,[p]). The derived subalgebra [L,L] ⊳ L is a non-zero ideal (since L is not abelian) and therefore [L,L]p = L, where [L,L]p denotes the p-closure of [L,L] inside L. Take a non-zero ideal 0 6= I ⊳ [L,L]. Since [L,L]p = L, we deduce from [13, Chapter 2, Prop. 1.3] that I is also an ideal of L and therefore Ip = L by the restricted simplicity of (L,[p]). From loc. cit., it follows also that [L,L] = [Ip,Ip] = [I,I] ⊂ I from which we deduce that I = L. Therefore [L,L] is simple. Since ad : L → DerF (L) is injective and [L,L]p = L, it follows by loc. cit. that ad : L → DerF ([L,L]) is injective. Therefore we have that [L,L] ⊂ L ⊂ DerF ([L,L]) and [p] hence [L,L] = [L,L]p = L. • Conversely, start with a simple Lie algebra M and consider its universal p- [p] envelop M < M < DerF (M). [p] [p] Take any restricted ideal I ⊳p M . By loc. cit., we deduce [I,M ] ⊂ I ∩ [M[p],M[p]]= I ∩[M,M]= I ∩M ⊳M. Therefore, by the simplicity of M, either I ∩M = M or I ∩ M = 0. In the first case, we have that M ⊂ I and therefore M[p] = I. In the second case, we have that [I,M[p]]= 0 and therefore I = 0 because M[p] has trivial center. We conclude that M[p] is simple restricted. Moreover, by loc. cit., we have that [M[p],M[p]] = [M,M]= M.

Note that the intersection of the two types of Lie algebrasappearing in the above correspondence is the set of restricted simple Lie algebras, namely those restricted Lie algebra which does not have any proper ideal. Simple Lie algebras (and their minimal p-envelopes) over k = k of char(k)= p > 3 have been classified by Block-Wilson-Premet-Strade (1984-2005), answering to a conjecture of Kostrikin-Shafarevich (1966). They are divided into two types:

• Lie algebras of Classical type;

• Lie algebras of (generalized) Cartan type.

4.1. Lie algebras of classical type

The Lie algebras of classical type are reduction of simple Lie algebras in characteristic zero. Simple Lie algebras over an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero were classified at the beginning of the XIX century by Killing and Cartan. The classification proceeds as follows: first the non-degeneracy of the is used to establish a correspondence between simple Lie algebras and irreducible root systems and then the irreducible root systems are classified by mean of their associated Dynkin diagrams. Simple finite group schemes and their infinitesimal deformations 7

Explicitly:

DYNKIN DIAGRAMS ←→ SIMPLE LIE ALGEBRAS

An (n ≥ 1) sl(n + 1)

Bn (n ≥ 2) so(2n + 1)

Cn (n ≥ 3) sp(2n)

Dn (n ≥ 4) so(2n)

E6,E7,E8,F4,G2 Exceptional Lie algebras where sl(n+1) is the special linear algebra, so(2n+1) is the special orthogonalalgebra of odd rank, sp(2n) is the symplectic algebra and so(2n) is the special orthogonal algebra of even rank. For the simple Lie algebras corresponding to the exceptional Dynkin diagrams, see the book [19] or the nice account in [3]. These simple Lie algebras admit a model over the integers via the (so-called) Chevalley bases. Therefore, via reduction modulo a prime p, one obtains a restricted Lie algebra over Fp, which is simple up to a quotient by a small ideal. For example sl(n) is not simple if p divide n, but its quotient psl(n)= sl(n)/(In) by the unit matrix In becomes simple. There are similar phenomena occurring only for p = 2,3 for the other Lie algebras (see [28, Page 209]). The restricted simple algebras obtained in this way are called algebras of classical type. Their Killing form is non-degenerate except at a finite number of primes. Moreover, they can be characterized as those restricted simple Lie algebras admitting a projective representation with nondegenerate form (see [4]).

4.2. Lie algebras of Cartan type

However, there are restricted simple Lie algebras which have no analogous in charac- teristic zero and therefore are called non-classical. The first example of a non-classical restricted simple Lie algebra is due to E. Witt, who in 1937 realized that the derivation p algebra W(1) := Derk(k[X]/(X )) over a field k of characteristic p > 3 is simple with a degenerate Killing form. In the succeeding three decades, many more non-classical restricted simple Lie algebras have been found (see [18], [14], [1], [15]). The first comprehensive conceptual approach to constructing these non-classical restricted sim- ple Lie algebras was proposed by Kostrikin-Shafarevich and Kac (see [22], [23], [21]). They showed that all the known examples can be constructed as finite-dimensional ana- logues of the four classes of infinite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebras, which occurred in Cartan’s classification of Lie pseudogroups (see [6]). Denote with O(m) the divided power k-algebra in m-variables. It is the com- mutative and associative algebra with unit defined by the generators xα for α ∈ Nm satisfying the relations

α β m α β α β + α+β i + i α+β x · x = α x := ∏ α x .   i=1  i  8 F. Viviani

For any m-tuple n ∈ Nm, we define the truncated subalgebra of O(m)

α ni O(m;n)= spanhx |0 ≤ αi < p i.

The simple Lie algebras of Cartan type (over an algebraically closed field k of characteristic p > 3) are divided in four families, called Witt-Jacobson, Special, Hamiltonian and Contact algebras, plus an exceptional family of Lie algebras in char- acteristic p = 5, called Melikian algebras. We list the simple graded Lie algebras of Cartan type. The general simple Lie algebras of Cartan type are filtered deformations of these graded Lie algebras (see [28, Chap. 6]).

(1) WITT-JACOBSON: The Witt-Jacobson Lie algebra W(m;n) is the subalgebra of DerkO(m;n) of special derivations:

m (a) (a−εi) W(m;n)= {D ∈ DerkO(m;n) : D(x )= ∑ x D(xi)}. i=1 The Witt-Jacobson Lie algebra is a free O(m,n) generated by the special deriva- (a) (a−ε ) tions ∂i defined by ∂i(x )= x i .

(2) SPECIAL: The Special Lie algebra is the subalgebra of W(m,n), m ≥ 3, of derivations preserving the special form ωS = dx1 ∧···∧ dxm:

(1) (1) S(m;n) = {D ∈ W(m;n) | D(ωS)= 0} ,

where (1) denotes the derived algebra.

(3) HAMILTONIAN: The Hamiltonian algebra is the subalgebra of W (2r,n) of deriva- tions preserving the Hamiltonian form ωH = dx1 ∧ dxr+1 + ··· + dxr ∧ dx2r:

(2) (2) H(2r;n) = {D ∈ W(2r;n) | D(ωH )= 0} ,

where (2) denotes the double derived algebra.

(4) CONTACT: The Contact algebra is the subalgebra of W(2r +1,n) of derivations ω ∑r preserving the contact form K = i=1(xidxi+r − xi+rdxi)+ dx2r+1 up to multi- ples:

(1) (1) K(2r + 1;n) = {D ∈ W(2r + 1;n) | D(ωK) ∈ O(2r + 1;n)ωK } .

(5) MELIKIAN (only if char(k)= 5): The Melikian algebra (introduced in [24]) is defined as ^ M(n1,n2)= O(2,(n1,n2)) ⊕W(2,(n1,n2)) ⊕W(2,(n1,n2)), Simple finite group schemes and their infinitesimal deformations 9

^ where W(2,(n1,n2)) denote a copy of W(2,(n1,n2)) and the Lie bracket is de- fined by the followingrules (for all D,E ∈W (2,(n1,n2)) and f ,g ∈ O(2,(n1,n2))): [D,E] := [D;E], ^ [D,E] := [D,E]+ 2div(D)E,  [D, f ] := D( f ) − 2div(D) f ,   e e [ f1D1 + f2D2,g1D1 + g2D2] := f1g2 − f2g1,  [ f ,E] := fE,  f f f f [ f ,g] := 2(gD ( f ) − fD (g))D + 2( fD (g) − gD ( f ))D ,  2 2 1 1 1 2  e where div( f D + f D ) := D ( f )+ D ( f ) ∈ O(2,(n ,n )).  1 1 2 2 1 1 2 f2 1 2 f The above algebras are restricted if and only if n = 1. In general, denoting with X(m,n) one of the above simple Lie algebras, its minimal p-envelope X(m,n)[p] inside its derivation algebra Derk(X(m,n)) is equal to (see [28, Theo. 7.2.2]):

m ∂p ji X(m;n)[p] = X(m;n)+ ∑ ∑ k · i . i=1 0< ji

5. Deformations of simple finite group schemes

Having at our hand a complete classification of the simple finite group schemes, it is natural to study their properties. Here we are interested in their deformations. Ac- cording to Grothendieck’s philosophy, one should first understand the infinitesimal deformations. It is a classical result (of difficult attribution) that the infinitesimal de- formations of the finite group scheme G are parametrized by H2(G,g), the second cohomology group of G with values in the adjoint representation g = Lie(G).

5.1. Deformations of simple (abstract) groups

From the Maschke’s theorem, it follows that every constant group scheme is rigid over a field of characteristic not dividing the order of the group. In particular this applies to the finite group schemes associated to simple finite groups. We don’t known what happens if the characteristic of k divides the order of the group.

5.2. Deformations of Lie algebras of Classical type

If G is a finite group scheme of height one associated to a restricted Lie algebra (g,[p]), the cohomology Hi(G;g) of G with values in the adjoint representation is equal to the i restricted cohomology H∗(g,g) of g with values in the adjoint representation (see [16]). 10 F. Viviani

The restricted cohomology is related to the ordinary cohomology by two spec- tral sequences (see [20] and [12]):

p,q p q−p p+q E1 = HomFr(S g,H (g,M)) ⇒ H∗ (g,M) if p 6= 2, p,q Λq p p+q (E2 = HomFr( g,H∗ (g,M)) ⇒ H (g,M), where Spg and Λqg denote, respectively, the p-th symmetric power and the q-th alter- nating power, and HomFr denotes the homomorphisms which are Frobenius linear. In the case of the adjoint representation and for centerless Lie algebras, the above spectral sequences give rise to the following relations for the low cohomology groups:

1 1 H∗ (g,g)= H (g,g), 2 2 1 (0 → H∗ (g,g) → H (g,g) → HomFrob(g,H (g,g)).

It is a classical fact that simple Lie algebras are rigid in characteristic zero.

THEOREM 5.1 (Whithead). If g is a simple Lie algebra over a field k of char(k)= 0, then H∗(g,g)= 0. In particular g is rigid.

The proof uses the non-degeneracyof the Killing form. If char(k)= p does not divide the discriminant of the Killing form, then the same proof gives the rigidity of simple Lie algebras of classical type in characteristic p. Indeed Rudakov ([25]) has shown the following

THEOREM 5.2 (Rudakov). If k is a field of char(k)= p ≥ 5 and g is a simple Lie algebra of classical type, then g is rigid.

Note, however, that the preceding result is false if p = 2,3 (see [9], [10], [8]).

5.3. Deformations of Lie algebras of Cartan type

The Lie algebras of Cartan type do have infinitesimal deformations, unlike the Lie algebras of classical type. We computed in [33] (building upon [30], [31] and [32]) the infinitesimal deformations of the simple finite group schemes associated to simple and restricted Lie algebras of Cartan type.

THEOREM 5.3 ([33]).

2 h∗(W (m;1),W(m;1)) = m, 2 h∗(S(m;1),S(m;1)) = m,  h2(H(2r;1),H(2r;1)) = 2r + 1,  ∗  2 h∗(K(2r + 1;1),K(2r + 1;1)) = 2r + 1, 2 h∗(M(1,1),M(1,1)) = 5.    Simple finite group schemes and their infinitesimal deformations 11

Moreover, in each of the above cases, we get explicit generators for the above second cohomology groups. It would be interesting to extend the above computation to the others simple restricted Lie algebras of Cartan type (i.e. the ones with n 6= 1).

5.4. Further developments

We hope that, using similar techniques to the ones used in [33], it could be possible to answer to the following Questions (for all simple finite group schemes G):

• What is the space of obstructions H3(G,g)? • What is the semi-versal deformation space of G?

References

[1] A. A. Albert and M. S. Frank, Simple Lie algebras of characteristic p, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino, 14 (1954-1955), 117–139. [2] M. Aschbacher, The status of the classification of the finite simple groups Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 51 (2004), 736–740. [3] J. Baez, The Octonions, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 39 (2002), 145-205. [4] R. E. Block, Trace forms on Lie algebras, Canad. J. Math., 14 (1962), 553–564. [5] R. E. Block and R. L. Wilson, The restricted simple Lie algebras are of classical or Cartan type, Proc. Nat. Aca. Sci. USA, 81 (1984), 5271–5274. [6] E. Cartan, Les groupes de transformations continus, infinis, simples, Ann. Sci. École Nor. Sup., 26 (1909), 93–161. [7] R. W. Carter, Simple groups of Lie type, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 28, John Wiley and Sons, London-New York-Sydney, 1972. [8] N. G. Chebochko, Deformations of classical Lie algebras with a homogeneous in characteristic two I (Russian), Mat. Sb., 196, (2005), 125–156. English translation: Sb. Math. 196 (2005), 1371–1402. [9] N. G. Chebochko and M. I. Kuznetsov, Deformations of classical Lie algebras (Russian),Mat. Sb., 191 (2000), 69–88. English translation: Sb. Math. 191 (2000), 1171–1190.

[10] N. G. Chebochko, S. A. Kirillov and M. I. Kuznetsov, Deformations of a Lie algebra of type G2 of characteristic three (Russian), Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Mat., 2000, 33–38. English translation: Russian Math. (Iz. VUZ) 44 (2000), 31–36. [11] M. Demazure and P. Gabriel: Groupes algébriques, Tome I: Géométrie algébrique, généralités, groupes commutatifs (French), Avec un appendice Corps de classes local par Michiel Hazewinkel, Masson and Cie, Editeur, Paris; North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1970. [12] R. Farnsteiner, Cohomology groups of reduced enveloping algebras, Math. Zeit., 206 (1991), 103–117. [13] R. Farnsteiner and H. Strade, Modular Lie algebras and their representation, Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied mathematics, vol. 116, Dekker, New York, 1988. [14] M. S. Frank, A new class of simple Lie algebras, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 40 (1954), 713–719. [15] M. S. Frank, Two new classes of simple Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 112 (1964), 456– 482. [16] G. Hochschild, Cohomology of restricted Lie algebras, Amer. J. Math.,76 (1954), 555–580. [17] N. Jacobson, Abstract derivations and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 42 (1937), 206–224. 12 F. Viviani

[18] N. Jacobson, Classes of restricted Lie algebras of characteristic p, II, Duke Math. Journal, 10 (1943), 107-121. [19] N. Jacobson, Exceptional Lie algebras, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics 1, Marcel Dekker, New York 1971. [20] J. C. Jantzen, Representations of algebraic groups, Pure and Applied Mathematics, 131, Aca- demic Press, Boston, 1987. [21] V. G. Kac, The classification of the simple Lie algebras over a field with nonzero characteristic (Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 34 (1970), 385–408. English translation: Math. USSR- Izv., 4 (1970), 391–413. [22] A. I. Kostrikin and I. R. Shafarevich, Cartan’s pseudogroups and the p-algebras of Lie (Russian), Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,168 (1966), 740–742. English translation: Soviet Math. Dokl., 7 (1966), 715–718. [23] A. I. Kostrikin and I. R. Shafarevich, Graded Lie algebras of finite characteristic (Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Math., 33 (1969), 251–322. English translation: Math. USSR-Izv., 3 (1969), 237–304. [24] G. M. Melikian, Simple Lie algebras of characteristic 5 (Russian), Uspekhi Mat. Nauk,35 (1980), 203–204. [25] A. N. Rudakov, Deformations of simple Lie algebras (Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 35 (1971), 1113–1119. [26] R. Solomon, On finite simple groups and their classification, Notices Amer. Math. Soc.,42 (1995), 231–239. [27] R. Solomon, A brief history of the classification of the finite simple groups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,38 (2001), 315–352. [28] H. Strade, Simple Lie algebras over fields of positive characteristic I: Structure theory, De Gruyter Expositions in Mathematics, 38, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004. [29] H. Strade and R. L. Wilson, Classification of Simple Lie Algebras over Algebraically Closed Fields of Prime Characteristic, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 24 (1991), 357–362. [30] F. Vivani, Infinitesimal deformations of restricted simple Lie algebras I, J. Algebra 320 (2008), 4102–4131. [31] F. Viviani, Infinitesimal deformations of restricted simple Lie algebras II, J. Pure and Applied Algebra 213 (2009), 1702-1721. [32] F. Viviani, Deformations of the restricted Melikian algebra, Comm. Algebra 37 (2009), 1850– 1872. [33] F. Viviani, Restricted infinitesimal deformations of restricted simple Lie algebras, submitted. Preprint available at arXiv:0705.0821. [34] W. C. Watherhouse, Introduction to Affine Group Schemes. GTM 66, Springer-Verlag, 1979. [35] R. A. Wilson, The finite simple groups. GTM 251, Springer-Verlag, 2009.

AMS Subject Classification: 14L15, 17B70, 20D05, 17B50, 17B56

Filippo Viviani, Dipartimento di Matematica Università Roma Tre, Largo S. Leonardo Murialdo 1, 00146 Roma (Italy) e-mail: [email protected]

Lavoro pervenuto in redazione il MM.GG.AAAA.