6118 NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 228
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historic Heritage Inventory
Historic Heritage Inventory District Plan WAITEKAURI RIVER RAILWAY BRIDGE Schedule Number: No 8, WAIKINO HAU447 Heritage Category: C Heritage Type: Wahi Tapu Cultural Landscape Building Group of Buildings Structure Monument Historic Place Archaeological Site Other Date Period: 1904-05 Significance: Archaeological Architectural Cultural Historic Location: East of the Waikino Railway Station. Scientific Technological Heritage Status HDC Heritage Category: C -Heritage Item. National or Outstanding Regional Thematic Significance. Rare feature. Context Other: Feature on the Goldfields Railway Inc route between Waikino Station and Maori Waihi Station Early Settlement Physical Description: Double span Howe through wooden truss bridge with Industry counter struts in the two central bays. The railway bridge is 154.5 feet (47metres) Extraction long and constructed on a concrete foundation. (See plans included with Forestry associated pictures). Agriculture Transport Associated structures: Waihi railway line, Waihi Railway Station Communication Commerce Other known names: Residential Notable features: 24 metre long wooden trusses with counter struts in the two Social/Cultural central bays. Civic Health Style: Howe Through Truss bridge Educational Church/yard Materials: Iron bark timber, steel, concrete foundation Other Date of Construction: 1904-05 Doc Ref: 780709 –v3 Historic Heritage Inventory District Plan WAITEKAURI RIVER RAILWAY BRIDGE Schedule Number: No 8, WAIKINO HAU447 Heritage Category: C History: The No 8 Waitekauri River Railway Bridge was constructed in 1904-05, probably by the Public Works Department (PWD). The design used was a Howe Truss, patented by William Howe in 1840. The Howe Truss bridge design utilised both wood and wrought iron, because wood was difficult to use as a tension member. -
Fees and Charges 2017/18 Reserves Rentals - Regular Users
Fees and Charges 2017/18 Reserves Rentals - Regular users Regular seasonal sportsground users Sportsground rentals are based on a percentage of the sportsground maintenance cost (although other factors are considered). The actual rentals are as per the schedule below for the applicable summer or winter season. 1. For regular sportsground users where no gate entry is charged, the rental shall be based on 12.5% of the annual budgeted sportsground maintenance cost. 2. For regular sportsground users where a gate entry is charged, the rental shall be based on 50% of the budgeted sportsground annual maintenance cost. Whakatane Reserve Name of organisation Fee (season) Eve Rimmer Sportsfield Mataatua Rugby League Club $460.00 Whakatāne Rugby sub-union $160.00 Red Conway Park Marist Rugby and Sport $1,070.00 Rex Morpeth Park Whakatāne Town Football Association $2,120.00 Eastern BOP Cricket Association $1,630.00 Whakatāne Touch Association $1,580.00 Athletic Domain Whakatāne Athletic and Harriers Club $540.00 Rugby Park Eastern Bay of Plenty Rugby Sub-Union $1,825.00 Rangitaiki Edgecumbe Domain Edgecumbe Rugby and Sport $1,655.00 Awakeri Sports Fields Edgecumbe Plains Rangers Soccer (Apr-Sep) $630.00 Eivers Park (Te Teko) Te Teko Rugby Club $555.00 Dunderdale Park (Te Teko) Te Teko Rugby Club $800.00 Richmond Park (Matatā) Matatā Rugby Club $1,825.00 Matatā Recreation Reserve Matatā Tennis Club $175.00 Awakeri Sports Fields Awakeri Junior Soccer Club $245.00 Twilight Cricket $167.00 Ohope Bluett Park Ōhope Junior Soccer Club $490.00 Wharekura Reserve Ōhope Twilight Cricket $167.00 Ōhope Tennis Club $273.00 Port Ōhope Recreational Reserve EBOP Triathalon & Multisport Club $153.33 West End Reserve Salt Spray Surf School $287.00 Otao Reserve Schedule Charges and Fees SUP (Port Ōhope General Store & Café) $287.00 ouncil Taneatua C Tāneatua Domain and Recreational Reserve Tāneatua Rugby Football Club Inc. -
Nuku Road.Indd
Archaeological investigations of W15/204, 77 Nuku Road, Taneatua (HNZPTA authority 2014/1044) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and Nathan Jones Arden Cruickshank CFG Heritage Ltd. P.O. Box 10 015 Dominion Road Auckland 1024 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Archaeological investigations of W15/204, 77 Nuku Road, Taneatua (HNZPTA authority 2014/1044) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga and Nathan Jones Prepared by: Arden Cruickshank Reviewed by: Date: 1 December 2014 Matthew Campbell Reference: 13-0525 Th is report is made available by CFG Heritage Ltd under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. CFG Heritage Ltd. P.O. Box 10 015 Dominion Road Auckland 1024 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Hard copy distribution Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, Tauranga New Zealand Archaeological Association (fi le copy) CFG Heritage Ltd (fi le copy) University of Auckland General Library University of Otago Anthropology Department Nathan Jones Te Runanga o Ngati Awa Archaeological investigations of W15/204, 77 Nuku Road, Taneatua (HNZPTA authority 2014/1044) Arden Cruickshank Nathan Jones proposes the construction of a house at 77 Nuku Road, Taneatua (Lot 1 DPS 53931). Several archaeological sites are recorded in the New Zealand Archaeological Association (NZAA) Site Recording Scheme (SRS) (www.arch- site.org.nz) in the vicinity of the property, including W15/204 which sits on the boundary within 200 m of the proposed house site. An archaeological assessment of eff ects was carried out by CFG Heritage Ltd (Harris 2013) on behalf of Nathan Jones in support of an application to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga (Heritage NZ) for an archaeological authority under section 44 of the Heritage 1. -
Murupara Community Board 20 March 2017
MURUPARA COMMUNITY BOARD MEETING MONDAY, 20 MARCH 2017 AGENDA Meeting to be held in the Minginui Kokiri Centre, 63 Rimu Street, Minginui at 12:00 noon Marty Grenfell CHIEF EXECUTIVE 10 March 2017 A403698 WHAKATĀNE DISTRICT COUNCIL MONDAY, 20 MARCH 2017 MURUPARA COMMUNITY BOARD - AGENDA TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM SUBJECT PAGE NO 1 Membership .............................................................................................. 4 2 Apologies .................................................................................................. 4 3 Public Forum ............................................................................................. 4 4 Confirmation of Minutes ........................................................................... 5 4.1 Minutes - Murupara Community Board 31 January 2017 ........................................................... 5 5 Reports ..................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Activity Report to 28 February 2016 .......................................................................................... 8 5.1.1 Appendix - Community Board Conference Programme .................................................. 15 5.2 Standing Orders for Community Boards ................................................................................... 16 5.3 Code of Conduct for Community Boards .................................................................................. 28 6 Chairperson and Subcommittee Reports ................................................. -
Rangitaiki Community Board 22 August 2018
RANGITĀIKI COMMUNITY BOARD WEDNESDAY, 22 AUGUST 2018 AGENDA Meeting to be held in the Edgecumbe Community Library, College Road, Edgecumbe at 5:30 pm Marty Grenfell CHIEF EXECUTIVE 16 August 2018 WHAKATĀNE DISTRICT COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, 22 AUGUST 2018 Rangitāiki Community Board - AGENDA TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM SUBJECT PAGE NO 1 Membership .............................................................................................. 4 2 Apologies .................................................................................................. 4 3 Conflict of Interest ..................................................................................... 4 4 Public Forum ............................................................................................. 4 5 Presentation .............................................................................................. 5 6 Recovery Update ....................................................................................... 5 7 Confirmation of Minutes ........................................................................... 6 7.1 Minutes - Rangitāiki Community Board 11 July 2018 .................................................................. 6 8 Reports ................................................................................................... 13 8.1 Rangitāiki Community Board Activity Report to 31 July 2018 ................................................... 13 8.2 Request for Funding – Waterwheel Historical Trust ................................................................. -
Strategic Direction Identification of Influences on the Whakatane District
IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENCES ON THE WHAKATANE DISTRICT SECTION 1 - STRATEGIC DIRECTION IDENTIFICATION OF INFLUENCES ON THE WHAKATANE DISTRICT BACKGROUND on decisions made in a global environment, the Council additional compliance costs associated with meeting has a responsibility to ensure we retain the ongoing higher drinking water standards. Government policy will The Council’s plans and work programmes over the sustainability of our communities. Internet access impact on the Council, what it does, and the relative cost next ten years are targeted to meet the future needs enables increased visibility of the Whakatane District of the provision of services. These impacts need to be of the District. To do this successfully, it is important to to the rest of the world and to enable those who live managed. understand what will influence change in our district and here, access to increased knowledge, people in other In a country that is increasingly urbanised, the “one the elements of change that can be influenced by the countries, lifestyle choices and to goods and services. Council so that our communities can achieve their aims size fits all” approach does not necessarily benefit and aspirations for the future. NATIONAL IMPACTS our communities which make up some of the most socio-economically deprived areas of New Zealand. While the LTCCP 2009-2019 has a 10 year time horizon, A three-year electoral system leads to uncertainty around Our Council needs to be well placed and resourced many of the programmes and budgets have a longer the stability of policy decisions and the continuation to advocate for our communities and to ensure that it term focus. -
Sc30804293 19112915140
r WHAKATANE DISTRICT COUNCIL/ TRANSIT NEW ZEALAND ..., WHAKATANE TRANSPORTATION STUDY STATE HIGHWAY 2 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES SCOPING STUDY REPORT ..., .., , .,,,,z;, l 'NEW ZEALAND ARARAU AOTEAROA l DRAFT WHAKAT ANE DISTRICT COUNCIL/ TRANSIT NEW ZEALAND ,..., WHAKATANE TRANSPORTATION STUDY STATE HIGHWAY 2 ALTERNATIVE ROUTES SCOPING - STUDY REPORT ...., Approved for Issue: _____________ Date: ------- Jim McGuire Regional Transportarion Mtmager Transit New Zealand: Tauranga Approved for Issue: _____________ Date: _______ Haydn Read Director of Works and Senrices Whakatane District Council Status of Report: Draft No.3 ___________.Date: 151 December 2007 .., 1 I ,.., EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report forms part of the Whakatane Transportation Study for Whakatane District Council (WDC) and Transit New Zealand (Trans1t). It identifies potential long term alternative State Highway 2 corridors to improve route security and efficiency between Matata and the State Highway 2/Wainui Road intersection. The site area is shown in Drawing 134960-P101. This is a seeping study only, and identifies preliminarily routes which could potentially be investigated in future. I) The existing State Highway 2 route from Matata to the State Highway Two/Wainui Road intersection deviates significantly from a direct route, resulting in inefficiencies, and as a result use of local roads by state highway traffic. II) In addition, the existing state highway route has route security Issues arising from flooding and the stability of key bridges. Bridge insecurity resulting from scour, overturning, and seismic failure are considered to be significant risks for the Ontrack owned State Highway 2 crossing of the Whakatane River (Pekatahi Bridge). The only alternative crossing of the Whakatane River Is on State Highway 30 (Landing Road Bridge). -
GAS DISTRIBUTION Asset Management Plan 2020
GAS DISTRIBUTION Asset Management Plan 2020 Appendices 2 GAS DISTRIBUTION BUSINESS ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 – APPENDIX A APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY TERM DEFINITION TERM DEFINITION AMMAT Asset Management Maturity Assessment Tool GNS Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences ALARP As Low as Reasonably Practicable GTB Gas Transmission Business AMP Asset Management Plan HDD Horizontal Directional Drilling ARR Asset Replacement and Renewal HSEQ Health, Safety, Environment and Quality CAIDI Customer Average Interruption Duration Index ICA Interconnection Agreement CAPEX Capital Expenditure – the expenditure used to ICP Installation Control Point – the connection create new or upgrade existing physical assets point from a customer to the Firstgas network in the network, as well as non-network assets e.g. IT or facilities ICT Information and Communications Technology CMMS Computerised Maintenance Management System ILI In Line Inspection COO Chief Operating Officer – Senior executive tasked FSP Field Service Provided with over-seeing the day-to-day administrative and operational functions of the business IPS Invensys Process Systems CS Compressor Station – station that contains a Gas IS Information Systems Compression Plant ISO 55000 International Standard for Asset Management CP Cathodic Protection IT Information Technology CPI Consumer Price Index KPI Key Performance Indicator DCVG Direct Current Voltage Gradient – a survey LOS Line of Sight technique used for assessing the effectiveness of corrosion protection on buried steel structures LPT Low -
A HISTORY of the TUARARANGAIA BLOCKS Wai894 #A3 Wai36 #A22 Wai 726 #A4
A HISTORY OF THE TUARARANGAIA BLOCKS Wai894 #A3 Wai36 #A22 Wai 726 #A4 PETER CLAYWORTH A REPORT COMMISSIONED BY THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL MAY 2001 CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS ....................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 8 i.i Claims relating to the Tuararangaia blocks ...................................................................... 12 CHAPTER 1: THE TUARARANGAIA BLOCK: TE WHENUA, TE TANGATA ....... 16 1.1 Te Whenua, Te Ngahere ................................................................................................. 16 1.2 Early occupation and resource uses ................................................................................ 19 1.3 Hapu and iwi associated with Tuararangaia ................................................................... 22 1.3.1 Ngati Awa ................................................................................................................. 22 1.3.2 Ngati Pukeko ............................................................................................................. 23 1.3.3 Warahoe .................................................................................................................... 24 1.3.4 Ngati Hamua ............................................................................................................ -
Part B: Community Property 12 MARCH 2018
ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Part B: Community Property 12 MARCH 2018 whakatane.govt.nz Community Property - Asset Management Plan Part B – Community Property 2018 Draft Asset Management Plan Part B – Community Property 2018-28 Part B provides the specific Asset Management information for Community Property, for the period 2018-2028. X[A1228573] 2018-2028 Asset management Plan Page 1 of 66 Community Property - Contents Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Foreword ................................................................................................................................................. 7 1 Asset Management Plan – Part A ................................................................................................ 7 2 Asset Management Plan – Part B ................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 8 1 The Assets This Plan Covers ........................................................................................................ 8 Business Overview .................................................................................................................................. 9 1 Why we do it .............................................................................................................................. -
Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki
Bay of Plenty Regional Council Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki Bay of Plenty Regional Council Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki Prepared By Opus International Consultants Ltd Peter Askey Whakatane Office Principal Environmental Engineer Level 1, Opus House, 13 Louvain Street PO Box 800, Whakatane 3158 New Zealand Reviewed By Telephone: +64 7 308 0139 Jack McConchie Facsimile: +64 7 308 4757 Principal Hydrologist Date: 30rd November 2017 Reference: 2-34346.00 Status: Issue 2 © Opus International Consultants Ltd 2017 Assessment of Flooding and Drainage Issues at Kopuriki i Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Key Issues .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Land ownership ................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Resource Consents ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Lake Aniwaniwa and the Rangitaiki River .......................................................... 5 2.1 Lake Accretion Rates ........................................................................................................ -
Kawerau Geothermal System Management Plan
KAWERAU GEOTHERMAL SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN February 2018 Prepared in Collaboration with Executive Summary The Kawerau Geothermal System is located to the north-east of Kawerau within the Bay of Plenty Region, and partially underlies the township of Kawerau. It has been substantially developed for industrial purposes pursuant to resource consents granted by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council (BOPRC) under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). This includes geothermal energy being used for electricity generation, industrial processes (direct heat) and cultural purposes. Bay of Plenty Regional Council has functions under Section 30 of the RMA for the management of geothermal resources. The Bay of Plenty Regional Policy Statement (RPS) requires the preparation of a System Management Plan (SMP) for the Kawerau Geothermal System as a key part of the way in which BOPRC intends to manage the Kawerau Geothermal System. This SMP has been prepared in collaboration with the four consent holders authorised to take more than 1,000 tonnes per day of geothermal fluid from the Kawerau Geothermal System, being: Mercury NZ Limited, Ngāti Tūwharetoa Geothermal Assets Limited, Geothermal Developments Ltd, and Te Ahi O Māui Partnership. Engagement has also been undertaken with tangata whenua and interested and potentially affected parties, including industrial operators using the geothermal resource. The purpose of this SMP is to ensure that the Kawerau Geothermal System is managed in a sustainable manner in accordance with the requirements of the RMA and the relevant policy and planning documents prepared under the RMA. The content anticipated in an SMP is set out in Policy GR7B of the RPS and includes objectives for its overall management and strategies to achieve the objectives The SMP is a non-statutory document and will be periodically reviewed and updated to ensure that it remains relevant and fit for purpose.