1.011 Project Evaluation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1.011 Project Evaluation 1.011 PROJECT EVALUATION OCEANSIDE-ESCONDIDO RAIL PROJECT NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT Above: Rendering of Example Station Right: DMU Train Bottom: Cal-State San Marcos Station JOHN R. VELASCO UNDERGRADUATE SPRING 2003 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 Executive Summary A Brief Project History State Route (SR) 78 is one of the most heavily traveled freeways in San Diego County. Despite recent improvements, it exceeded capacity by the year 2000 and will continue to experience significant increases in traffic demand in the coming decades. For a period of 15 years, there have been a number of transportation studies specifically to identity feasible and cost-effective solutions to the growing transportation needs of northern San Diego County along the SR-78 corridor. Participants in these studies have included SANDAG (San Diego Association of Governments), Caltrans, NCTC (North County Transit District), and the jurisdictions of Oceanside, Carlsbad, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and the County of San Diego. The study recommended a multimodal approach which includes the provision of passenger rail service over the existing railway right-of-way (ROW), highway improvements, and subregional arterial network improvements. A 1987 study conducted by SANDAG that included a detailed analysis of transit alternatives recommended DMU (diesel multiple-unit) as the preferred rail technology for the SR-78 corridor. In 1987, Proposition A was passed by San Diego voters authorizing the establishment of TRANSNET Funds for local transportation projects which included the Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project. The Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project has a number of objectives it aims to fulfill: - provide an alternative mode of transportation to the automobile in the SR-78 corridor; - alleviate the traffic along this crucial corridor between the coastal and inland North County; - satisfy the public mandate, expressed in voter approval of proposition A in 1987 to finance significant transportation improvements; - provide an efficient non-automobile linkage to some of the area’s key destinations and employment centers; - reduce auto-related air emissions, thereby contributing to the improvement of regional air quality; and - support local land use efforts to revitalize underutilized areas and to assist in the growth of targeted development areas. Source: Environmental Assessment/Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Oceanside--Escondido Rail Project, NCTD, 1996. -1- 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 To meet these goals, the proposed project consists of improving 22 miles of existing railroad ROW between the Oceanside and Escondido Transit Centers and adding 1.7 miles of new rail to Cal-State University San Marcos thereby establishing a complete new passenger rail system including new vehicles, stations, a maintenance facility, and ROW improvements. Analysis In analyzing the Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project, I reviewed the major issues of transit congestion that plague the region, as well as several alternatives to solving the problems of congestion and continuing growth. In analyzing each alternative, I briefly examine the costs and benefits. In covering these different alternatives I will approach the discussion in a qualitative manner, as specific numbers for the alternatives (in terms of costs and benefits) were difficult to obtain. I have also covered the proposed alternative with more in depth discussion, with financial analyses, the costs and benefits both in qualitative and as well as quantitative terms. Additionally, the uncertainties of the project will be considered and a scenarios dealing with uncertainty will be presented. Analysis of how the projects costs and benefits might change given this scenario will also be conducted. Recommendation My recommendation to the parties involved (NCTD, Caltrans, SANDAG, and local governments) will be to proceed with the project as planned. The current proposal, as it stands, is the most economically feasible and sustainable alternative. The costs of the No-Action Alternative are too high—as the population of North San Diego County is expected to grow 74.5 % from 1990 (447,048) to 2015 (780,082)—based on current projections (US Census 2000). As population grows, the demand for housing, jobs, and alternative modes of transportation will continue to grow. SR-78 has reached full-capacity and it is neither financially nor physically possible to expand it from 6 to 8 lanes as it would require the reconstruction of numerous bridges and the displacement of a large number of North County residents and businesses. Therefore I recommend the project based not only on the demonstrated need, but also on the low costs (per mile of construction) and the numerous benefits such as decreased congestion and emissions, that it will bring to the region in the years to come. -2- 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 Background History The Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project includes approximately 15 stations serving the 22-mile alignment along existing right-of-way that NCTD purchased in 1990 for $43.4 million dollars. According to a survey conducted by NCTD, 78% of North County residents believe that traffic on SR-78 is a major issue. SR-78 is a heavily-traveled corridor with moderate to severe congestion with 145,000 vehicle trips/day. With the estimated 74% increase in population from 1990 to 2015, it is likely that traffic will continue to be a major issue along the corridor (US Census, 2000). A thorough listing of the reasons behind the need for the project is provided below, divided by the major project components: the main line and the Cal-State San Marcos Loop. Below: Map of the Proposed Oceanside-Escondido Rail Line (Source: North County Transit District) -3- 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 MAIN LINE This portion of the project is along the existing NCTD owned ROW from Oceanside to Escondido. Traffic Conditions SR-78 serves as the main east-west route in North San Diego County between Interstate 15 (I-15) and Interstate 5 (I-5). It is anchored by the two largest cities in the North County—Oceanside and Escondido. The nearest expressways that run parallel to SR-78 are SR-76, 15 miles to the north, and SR-56, yet to be completed, 15 miles to the south. The SR-78 corridor contains a mixture of different zones ranging from residential to commercial, industrial, and educational with Cal-State San Marcos and Palomar College. Despite the widening of the corridor from 4 to 6 lanes nearly a decade ago, it reached capacity by the year 2000; congestion continues to occur on a daily basis. The California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) has said in its evaluation of the corridor that it may be economically infeasible to expand the highway to 8-lanes due to ROW (right-of-way) constraints. Although Caltrans has plans to improve SR-78 that including upgrading interchanges, ramp metering, and adding auxiliary lanes, forecasts still indicate increases in traffic in the years to come. These increases are attributed to the local street networks which are inadequate for short intraregional trips, forcing those who might usually take surface streets to have to use the freeway for shorter trips. Growth SANDAG currently identifies northern San Diego County as one of the fastest growing areas in California as families are flocking to Southern California for its beautiful year-round weather and job opportunities. The population along the SR-78 corridor alone is expected to grow by 74.5% from 1990 to 2015—an increase of over 300,000 people, which greatly exceeds the current projections for the rest of San Diego county at 45% (Census 2000). -4- 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 This large increase in population creates a demand for additional housing. The number of housing units along the SR-78 corridor is expected to grow from 175,781 units in 1990 to 293,060 units in 2015—growing 40%. Despite slow economic growth in San Diego, the employment growth in the cities along the corridor is expected to increase by a total of 58.6% from 165,725 jobs in 1990 to a total of 262, 869 jobs by 2015. The employment growth rate in this corridor is over twice that of the San Diego region (SANDAG). Increasing Demand The strongest trip demand from the communities of the North County is for coastal and inland access, which SR-78 provides. Travel along the SR-78/Palomar Airport Road (which runs parallel to SR-78) corridor between the coastal and inland areas produces the second largest travel corridor in the region, and according to SANDAG, it will host 93,359 “person-trip travel movements” between corridor jurisdictions per day—an increase of nearly 84% from 1990. (Note: A person-trip movement is defined as a trip in which a person moves over 2 miles along this corridor). CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS LOOP Cal State San Marcos is in desperate need of an alternate mode of transportation to the campus due to projected enrollment growth and limited arterial access. Currently at 8,000 students, faculty and staff, it is expected to grow to around 18,000 (based on full-time enrollment even though some students attend part-time) by 2020 (Cal-State San Marcos). The actual number of persons going to and from campus on a daily basis is likely to be 45,000-50,000, according to university projections. CSU San Marcos included in their EIR (Environmental Impact Report) a mandate requiring some form of nonautomobile transportation to mitigate the intense traffic impact that will be placed on the surrounding area. -5- 1.011 Project Evaluation John R. Velasco Professor Carl Martland Spring, 2003 Alternatives In the transit studies that were conducted by SANDAG in collaboration with NCTD and other local and federal agencies, there were a number of alternatives considered.
Recommended publications
  • Meeting Notice and Agenda
    MEETING NOTICE AND AGENDA SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP The SPRINTER Smart Growth Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Wednesday, April 11, 2007 1:30 to 3:30 p.m. City of San Marcos, Valley of Discovery Room 1 Civic Center Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 Staff Contacts: Susan Baldwin and Christine Eary (619) 699-1943; (619) 699-6928 [email protected]; [email protected] AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS • DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR • I-PLACE3S SKETCH MODELING TOOL • SPRINTER SERVICE PLAN AND BUS COORDINATION SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone 1-800-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP Wednesday, April 11, 2007 ITEM # RECOMMENDATION 1. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS +2. SPRINTER SMART GROWTH WORKING GROUP MEETING APPROVE SUMMARY The Working Group should review and approve the January 31, 2007, Meeting Summary. REPORTS (3 through 6) 3. DEBRIEF FROM SPRINTER STATION AREA TOUR (WG members) DISCUSS Working Group (WG) members will have the opportunity to share comments and questions regarding the station area sites visited during the SPRINTER tour on March 14. Working Group members are asked to comment on site constraints common among the station areas, and strategies being implemented to address those constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • North County Transit Dist~Ict EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA- THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT STREET, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2219 VOICE AND TOO (415) 904-5200 M 14b STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON CONSISTENCY CERTIFICATION Consistency Certification No CC-029-02 Staff JRR-SF File Date 4/19/2002 3 Months 7/19/2002 6 Months 10/19/2002 Commission Meeting 9/9/2002 APPLICANT: North County Transit Dist~ict DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: Oceanside, San Diego County. (Exhibit 1-3) DEVELOPMENT DESCRIPTION: Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project. (Exhibit 4) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The North County Transit District (NCTD) proposes the Oceanside-Escondido Rail Project. The NCTD will convert an existing 22-mile freight rail corridor that runs parallel to State Route 78 (SR-78) into a Diesel Multiple Unit passenger rail system. The existing right of way connects the cities of Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and unincorporated areas of San Diego County. The project includes the construction of 1. 7 miles of new track to provide service to California State University, San Marcos (inland of the coastal zone). The line will have 15 stations (two that are in the coastal zone) and the system will be single-tracked with three sections of passing track, each 3.5 miles in length. The existing track supports three freight rail round trips per week. After the completion of the proposed project, NTCD will operate a maximum of 72 passenger trains per day in addition to the freight traffic, which will occur at night. The proposed project is consistent with the public access policies of the California Coastal Management Plan (CCMP).
    [Show full text]
  • REVISED Agenda
    810 Mission Avenue Oceanside, CA 92054 REVISED (760) 966-6500 (760) 967-2001 (fax) Agenda GoNCTD.com Thursday, April 16, 2020 Regular Meeting: 2:00 P.M. Location: NCTD Administrative Offices, 810 Mission Avenue, Oceanside, CA 92054 View Live Stream at: https://www.youtube.com/GoNCTD COVID-19 PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT AND SPECIAL PROCEDURES: The Governor of California has issued Executive Order N-25-20 (Order) regarding the COVID-19 public health emergency. The Order directs that certain public gatherings should be postponed or canceled. The Governor, through the Order, has provided authority to public agencies to conduct public meetings over teleconference systems where possible. The public may view the meetings online using live streaming at the link: https://www.youtube.com/GoNCTD. Board Members may participate in NCTD Board and/or Committee meetings via teleconference in accordance with the Order. Due to the COVID-19 public health emergency and the order by the State of California public health officials for anyone living in the State to stay home, in person participation at the NCTD Board of Directors meetings will not be allowed. Pursuant to the Order, NCTD is providing alternatives to in-person attendance for viewing and participating in NCTD Board and/or Committee meetings. 1 Members of the public may submit their comments via email at [email protected]. Public comments via email may be received up until the agenda item is called. Large groups wishing to comment on a common item are encouraged to submit comments in writing. Public comments submitted will be provided to the Board/Committee and included in the record of the Board/Committee Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q1-FY19[Icon]
    ATTACHMENT 4A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period July 1, 2018 – September 30, 2018 (Q1 of FY19) Page 1 of 46 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 3 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................ 6 Ridership ....................................................................................................................... 14 Farebox Recovery ......................................................................................................... 21 On-Time Performance ................................................................................................... 22 NCTD Customer Feedback ........................................................................................... 23 Paratransit and Fixed-Route Wheelchair Usage ............................................................ 32 Fare Collection System ................................................................................................. 36 Appendix A: BREEZE Descriptions and Service Statistics ............................................ 37 Appendix B: BREEZE Composite Rankings by Day Type ............................................. 40 Appendix C: October Service Change Ridership Trends .............................................. 44 Appendix D: COASTER & SPRINTER Quarterly Performance ..................................... 46 Page 2 of 46 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NCTD produces the
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region
    San Diego Association of Governments TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014 DRAFT TRANSIT ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN EconomicTHE Context SAN Report DIEGO REGION San Diego Regional TOD Strategy DRAFT - CONTEXT REPORT November 2014October 15, 2014 PREPARED FOR: San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) prepared for: PREPARED BY: SANDAG AECOM REGIONAL TOD STRATEGY Fashion Valley Transit Center in the 1980s. Flickr / SDMTS: https://www.flickr.com/photos/sdmts/13441171155/ TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES IN THE SAN DIEGO REGION: CONTEXT REPORT III SANDAG TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Context of Transit-Oriented Communities in the San Diego Region ........................ 1 2 Setting a Foundation for the Future of Transit-Oriented Communities .................... 5 3 Population, Employment, and Housing Growth in the San Diego Region ������������� 13 4 Regional Transit System and Access to Employment ............................................. 27 5 Local Market Readiness and Development Prototypes .......................................... 47 6 Types of Transit-Oriented Communities ................................................................. 59 7 Trends and Considerations ................................................................................... 67 8 Building a Toolbox ................................................................................................ 73 9 Example TOD Projects in the San Diego Region .................................................... 75 APPENDICES A Description
    [Show full text]
  • Triennial Security Review of the North County Transit District (Nctd)
    2015 TRIENNIAL SECURITY REVIEW OF THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 Draft Report October 14, 2016 (PUBLIC-REDACTED) Elizaveta Malashenko, Director Safety and Enforcement Division 2015 TRIENNIAL SECURITY REVIEW OF THE NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (NCTD) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) staff conducted this system security program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert – Program Manager Stephen Artus – Program and Project Supervisor Noel Takahara – Senior Utilities Engineer Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer Rep to NCTD Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NCTD BACKGROUND 3 4 REVIEW PROCEDURE 5 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS* 6 APPENDICES TABLE 7 A. Acronyms List 8 B. NCTD 2015 Security Review Checklist Index* 9 C. NCTD 2015 Security Review Recommendations List* 10 D. NCTD 2015 Security Review Checklists* 11 ii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The California Public Utilities Commission’s (Commission) Safety and Enforcement Division (SED), Rail Transit Safety Branch staff (Staff) conducted an on-site security review of the North County Transit District (NCTD) on August 25, 2015. The review focused on verifying the effective implementation of the System Security and Emergency Preparedness Plan, addressing Threat & Vulnerability Assessment (TVA), and emergency response procedures. Following the on-site security review, staff held a post-review conference with NCTD personnel on September 10, 2015. Staff provided the NCTD Chief of Transit Security a preliminary summary report detailing the on-site review Findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report Q2-FY18[Icon]
    ATTACHMENT 7A Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017 (Q2 of FY18) Page 1 of 47 Contents BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 8 ROUTE PERFORMANCE ............................................................................................. 30 NCTD CUSTOMER FEEDBACK .................................................................................. 37 FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM .................................................................................... 46 Page 2 of 47 BACKGROUND NCTD produces this Quarterly Performance Report to provide information regarding the performance of its operations. The data contained in this report for Fiscal Year 2018 is unaudited and subject to change. Final and audited financial and performance results will be provided as part of NCTD’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Page 3 of 47 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ridership Performance NCTD’s ridership performance is consistent with the nation-wide trends of decreased transit ridership, which can partly be attributed to the growing popularity of transportation network companies (TNCs), like Uber and Lyft, low unemployment, and increased automobile sales. Internal factors, like on-time performance, reliability,
    [Show full text]
  • RESOLUTION ST-98 Rail Transit and Crossing Branch November 6, 2008 Rail Transit Safety Section
    CPSD/RWC/RTSS/JEB/vdl Mailed 11/7/08 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Consumer Protection and Safety Division RESOLUTION ST-98 Rail Transit and Crossing Branch November 6, 2008 Rail Transit Safety Section R E S O L U T I O N RESOLUTION GRANTING NORTH COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT A VARIANCE TO GENERAL ORDER 143-B MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS ON HIGH LEVEL STATION PLATFORM “WING RAILINGS” AND ORDERING SPECIAL SAFETY PROCEDURES AT SPRINTER STATIONS WITH RETRACTABLE GANGWAYS SUMMARY This resolution grants North County Transit District’s (NCTD’s) request for a variance to General Order (GO) 143-B, Section No. 9.06 c (1) Side Clearance requirements on NCTD’s Sprinter Line high level station platforms. The resolution also imposes special safety procedures on NCTD’s Sprinter Line’s high level station platforms with retractable gangways. These special safety procedures are necessary to ensure safe operations on NCTD’s right-of-way shared by both freight railroad trains operated by the BNSF Railway (BNSF) and light rail transit vehicles as permitted by the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA’s) and Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) “temporal separation” provisions.1 1 See the October 3, 2006 letter from Grady C. Cothen, Jr., Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program Development, Federal Railroad Administration, to Mr. Edward Fishman, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Nicholson, Graham, LLP, Washington, DC; and “Joint Statement of Agency Policy Concerning Shared Use of the 360113 - 1 - CPSD/RWC/RTSS/JEB/vdl Resolution ST-98 November 6, 2008 PROJECT DESCRIPTION NCTD constructed a rail fixed-guideway system known as the “Sprinter” carrying passengers between the cities of Oceanside and Escondido on the existing 22-mile Escondido Branch Line, an active freight railroad line, with a new loop extension in San Marcos.
    [Show full text]
  • 014 Receive Update on SMTIP[Icon]
    April 2020 Strategic Multimodal Transit Implementation Plan The Strategic Multimodal Transit Implementation Plan (SMTIP) is a ten-year strategic plan that provides insight over current and future travel patterns and demand within NCTD’s service area, and identifies service and capital improvements that will support NCTD’s efforts to provide high quality transit services to North County residents and visitors over the long-term. The plan fol- lows a previous study, the Land Use Transit Integration Study (LUTIS), which identified, through technical analysis and input from stakeholders and the community, priority corridors, focus areas, and preferred strategies to improve transit efficiency and overall attractiveness. Started in August 2019, the SMTIP builds upon the findings of the LUTIS for the design of a ten-year strategy. Over the fall of 2019 and winter of 2020, IBI Group and its team of consultants have focused their efforts on the following tasks: • A review of existing plans, policies, and transit data to provide an up-to-date profile of existing conditions as well as track current and future initiatives to consider and integrate into the strategic plan. • A Transfer Survey, where surveyors went to busy intermodal stations to talk to transit riders and document their trips, with a special focus on origin and destination, as well as the modal combinations that compose their everyday trips. • A Location-Based Services (LBS) Travel Demand Analysis, anonymous cellphone-based data was used to identify overall trip characteristics within and around NCTD’s service area to understand the volume, length, and destinations of all trips in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Operations Quarterly Report
    Transit Operations Quarterly Report For the Period October 1, 2018 – December 31, 2018 (Q2 of FY19) Page 1 of 39 Contents PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY ......................................................................... 3 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................. 5 YEAR TO DATE PERFORMANCE ................................................................................. 8 APPENDIX A: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ................................................... 10 APPENDIX B: BREEZE ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ........ 11 APPENDIX C: COASTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STANDARDS ...... 20 APPENDIX D: SPRINTER ROUTE DESCRIPTION AND SERVICE STATISTICS ....... 24 APPENDIX E: LIFT SERVICE DESCRIPTION AND STATISTICS ............................... 28 APPENDIX F: FLEX ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS .............. 33 APPENDIX G: AMTRAK AND METROLINK ROUTE DESCRIPTIONS AND SERVICE STATISTICS ................................................................................................................. 36 APPENDIX I: FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM ............................................................... 38 Page 2 of 39 PERFORMANCE REPORT SUMMARY The Quarterly Transit Operations Performance Report provides an overview of NCTD performance trends by mode as they relate to budgeted goals for both year to date (through December 31, 2018) and in the current quarter for the fiscal year. NCTD performance goals are set either as contractual requirements or established
    [Show full text]
  • City of Oceanside, California This 2008 City of Oceanside Bicycle Master Plan Was Approved by City Council with a Unanimous Vote on December 17Th, 2008
    CityCity ofof OceansideOceanside BicBicyycclele MasterMaster PlanPlan 2008 Bicycle Friendly Community Prepared by KTU+A Planning + Landscape Architecture In association with IBI Group Transportation Planning for the City of Oceanside, California This 2008 City of Oceanside Bicycle Master Plan was approved by City Council with a unanimous vote on December 17th, 2008. City of Oceanside • Bicycle Master Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ES-1 Caltrans BTA Compliance ES-7 Introduction 1.1 Project Scope 1-1 1.2 Field Work 1-1 1.3 Bikeway Facility Types 1-1 1.3.1 Class 1 Bike Paths 1-1 1.3.2 Class 2 Bike Lanes 1-2 1 1.3.3 Class 3 Bike Routes 1-4 Existing Conditions 2.1 Existing Land Use 2-1 2.2 Planned Land Use 2-1 2.3 Bike Commuting 2-1 2 2.4 Age Density: Under 16 Years Old 2-1 2.5 Employment Density 2-1 2.6 Population Density 2-2 2.7 Activity centers 2-2 2.8 Traffic Volumes 2-2 2.9 Safety and security 2-3 2.10 Existing bicycle facilities and major street segments 2-18 2.10.1 Downs Street 2-18 2.10.2 California Street 2-18 2.10.3 Morse Street 2-18 2.10.4 Fire Mountain Drive 2-18 2.10.5 Foussat Road 2-18 2.10.6 North River Road 2-18 2.10.7 Pacific Street 2-19 2.10.8 Sleeping Indian Road 2-19 TOC-1 2.10.9 The Strand 2-19 2.10.10 Oceanside Boulevard 2-19 2.10.11 Rancho Del Oro Drive 2-20 2.10.12 Melrose Drive 2-20 2.10.13 North Santa Fe Avenue 2-20 2.10.14 Mission Avenue 2-20 2.10.15 Mesa Drive 2-20 2.10.16 Barnard Drive 2-21 2.10.17 College Boulevard 2-21 2.10.18 Lake Boulevard 2-21 2.10.19 El Camino Real 2-21 2.10.20 Douglas Drive 2-22
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Ocean
    Orange San Mateo County Camp San Mateo (62 Area) Christianitos Rd 15 395 FLEX Basilone Rd Camp San Onofre – Vine E Mission Rd Camp Horno 395 School of Infantry FLEX (52 Area) (53 Area) Ivy S Main Ave Ammunition Rd 5 388 Pala Casino 306 Fallbrook Brown St Camp Las Pulgas Community (43 Area) Sequoia Airpark Mission Rd Park and Ride RTA 202 De Luz 388 Casino 392 Pauma FLEX 395 FLEX Fallbrook Pala Rd 76 14 Area Camp 315 Pendleton Vandegrift Blvd 9th 11th Vandegrift Blvd Camp Las Flores 392 Mainside (41 Area) FLEX Ave E 22 Area 76 San Luis Rey Transit Center 306 Stuart Mesa Rd 303, 309, 311, 313, 315 315 Harrah’s Rd Center Valley Edson Range N River Rd Rincon (31 Area) Douglas Dr Casino Town Center North Gopher Canyon Rd Old Castle Rd N River Rd 313 Shopping Center 5 395 392 Whelan Valley FLEX FLEX Lake Mission Vista Transit Center 303 N Santa Fe Ave 388 Pala Rd San Luis Rey 302, 303, 305, 306, 318, E Vista Way E Vista Center Naval 303 Frazee Rd 332, 334, SPRINTER Rd Grade Cole Hospital Rancho Del Oro Mesa Camp Pendleton 309 College Blvd 303 MCX Old Grove Santa Fe Ave Santa Fe Ash Rd 311, 318, 323, Arbolitos Los College Blvd College SPRINTER Rancho Del Oro 315, 318, 323, 311 306 Lilac El Camino Real Camino El Valley Center Rd Oceanside 325, SPRINTER B St Municipal Via Rancho Heights Temple Arcadia Ave 15 12th St Old Grove Bobier Oak Dr Valley View Casino Airport 311 Avenida Foussat Del Oro 315 Camp Wire Mtn76 Rd Canyon Mesa 318 SPRINTER STATIONS 8th St Dr Center Del Mar Ocean Ranch BlvdCorporate Mission Ave313 Vale Terrace Center Dr Center Crouch Melrose Dr Dr Foothill Oceanside Transit Center 313 S.
    [Show full text]