Micheline Labelle Centre De Recherche Sur L'immigration, L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Micheline Labelle Centre De Recherche Sur L'immigration, L THE POLITICS OF MANAGING DIVERSITY. WHAT IS AT STAKE IN QUEBEC? Micheline Labelle Centre de recherche sur l’immigration, l’ethnicité et la citoyenneté Université du Québec à Montréal Preliminary Version Paper presented at the Conference Quebec and Canada in the New Century : New Dynamics, New Opportunities Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University Kingston, October 31-November 1, 2003 2 First, I would like to thank the Institute of Governmental Relations of Queen’s University for giving me the opportunity to be with you this morning. Special thanks to Professor Harvey Lazar, Michael Murphy and Daniel Salée for their invitation. Among the specific questions that the organizers have asked, the following are of particular interest for this presentation: "What role is played by external factors, such as the increasingly multicultural character of Quebec’s immigrant population? And does this detract from or merely alter the complexion of Quebec nationalism?" I will address these specific questions. However, before I proceed, I want to clarify that when we speak of Quebec society, we cannot reduce the notion of diversity to refer strictly to immigration. Debates on Quebec nationalism and sovereignty are being redefined not simply because of immigration. Beyond the immigrant population, the presence of ethnic minorities and Aboriginal peoples has to be considered. Although according to the programme for this conference this talk was to be entitled "The Cultural and Ideological Influences of Immigration", I have changed its title to "The Politics of Managing Diversity: what is at stake in Quebec" to better reflect this reality. My paper will first attempt to give a brief overview of how the Canadian government manages immigration, citizenship and multiculturalism. It is against this backdrop that we are best positioned to understand debates that take place around questions relating to managing diversity in Quebec society. I will pursue further by highlighting some of the most important debates that have taken place on issues of diversity and questions of sovereignty in the post- referendum era. 1. Canadian approaches to immigration and diversity During the past decade, most western societies have been looking for institutional and political ways to renew their approaches to citizenship. This renewal has taken place mainly 3 through immigration policies that increasingly emphasize the development of control mechanisms aimed at regulating immigrant entry. This shift is part of a socio-political and ideological vision that brings into focus issues of security and that acts as "a moralizing discourse, articulated around the idea of anomie and the loss of values" (Bigo, in Labelle and Salée, 2001). The Canadian state is no different on this matter. It has proceeded to implement changes to its policies in the area of immigration, multiculturalism and citizenship that work towards these ends. I look at each in turn. Immigration- With respect to immigration, the Canadian state wants to control more closely the immigration flows to Canada for their quality and volume to ensure Canada’s competitive advantage in a global economy (Canada CIC 1998a). Some observers believe that by implementing control mechanisms on immigration, the State is working to appease widespread fears in society towards immigrants. These fears are upheld through negative stereotypes that portray immigrants and refugees as criminals, as security threats, as potential drains on social service resources, and as individuals that have stakes in the violent conflicts taking place in their country of origin. Values that are held as core values include active citizenship, responsibility and partnership. In the period between 1991 and 2001, agreements on questions of immigration were signed between the federal government and each of the provinces and territories. The Metropolis Project was launched in 1996. Its aim was to bring together policy-makers, researchers and NGO to exchange on and develop policies to better manage migration and diversity. As early as 1992, Alan Simmons wrote: "The state is engaged in a hegemonic project involving a pro-active dialogue to gather information, to monitor support and opposition, and to attempt to control diverse interest groups... New social actors —ethnic groups, humanitarian organizations, the provinces— have come to play a more prominent role, within a field dominated by the federal state" (1992: 411). 4 Preoccupations about security were central in the pre-September 11 context and are even more so now. Canada has collaborated with the United States towards developing a common security perimeter. Since then, there have been various agreements such as the Smart Border Declaration (2001) to harmonize various policies between the two countries and the Safe Third Country Agreement (2002) to control the flow of asylum seekers. On the domestic front, security measures are key concerns of the "Anti-Terrorism Bill" (Bill C-36) (2001) and of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (2002). This has led critical voices to claim that the security measures in the new immigration policy are simultaneously increasing penalties and reducing individual rights and protections for refugees and immigrants (Canadian Council for Refugees, cited in Abu-Laban and Gabriel 2003: 299). Moreover, these new legislations have raised concerns around racial profiling and restrictions on civil liberties, particularly for people of Arab or Muslim origin (Abu-Laban and Gabriel, 2003: 300). Multiculturalism- The changes in policy content around multiculturalism in recent years have emerged largely in response to the public's and official's admonitions that the people interested in taking up Canadian citizenship must be made to understand that "loyalty to Canada must be given pride of place" (Canadian Heritage, 1994). With this in mind, the Multiculturalism programme was modified in 1997 to focus on a three-pronged approach that clearly emphasizes values to be associated with citizenship: Canadian identity (people of all backgrounds should «feel a sense of belonging and attachment to Canada»); civic participation (everyone must be an 'active citizen', concerned with shaping "the future of their communities and their country"); and social justice (everyone must be involved in "building a society that ensures fair and equitable treatment and that respects the dignity of and accommodates people of all origins") (Canadian Heritage, 1997: 1). The federal government has progressively moved to resolve the ongoing tension between multiculturalism and citizenship in favour of the latter. The Multiculturalism programme has been subjected to a shrinking budget (from 27 million dollars annually in 1990 to 18,7 million dollars in 1997). Recent discussions about multiculturalism have followed the neo-liberal tendencies also observed around questions of 5 immigration and citizenship. To uphold the principle of active citizenship, current proposals for grants must highlight «community initiative, partnership, and self-help» (Canadian Heritage 1998). Direct funding to ethnocultural organizations is now seen as problematic. Capitalizing on the idea of special interests, it has been argued that direct funding to ethnocultural organizations upholds the perception that multiculturalism is a programme for special interest groups rather than for all Canadians. A final change has been to infuse the management of diversity with a market ideology. Here, multiculturalism becomes a good that ensures Canadian access to the global market and improves our global competitiveness (Abu-Laban and Gabriel 2001: 114- 116). Recent debates outside government on questions relating to multiculturalism focus on the impact of neo-liberalism on the funding of ethnic groups, on the congruity between the principles of liberalism and multiculturalism, on the awareness of multiple sources of discrimination and racism, on the effectiveness of employment equity programmes, and the meaning of given identities (Labelle and Rocher, 2003). Citizenship- The new citizenship bill (C-18) that is currently before the House of Commons requires potential Canadians to make a strong commitment to Canada. The key changes brought forward through this bill include 1) a new oath that includes a direct expression of loyalty to Canada; 2) a longer period of time in which the permanent resident must have been in Canada prior to applying for citizenship; 3) new powers for the Minister to annul citizenship obtained through the use of false identity; and 4) a more active role for citizenship commissioners (currently designed as citizenship judges) in promoting Canadian citizenship (CIC, News Release, 2002). In October of this year, the Metropolis Project initiated a dialogue around a proposal for a Citizenship Charter. Having described the Canadian model of integration as a "two way street model" enshrined in the Multiculturalism Act and in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, it states that some critics argue that "diversity leads to greater change and the loss or weakening of our national identity". The Citizenship Charter is then proposed as "a useful public 6 policy tool to encourage a sense of attachment and belonging to Canada and thus facilitate the integration of newcomers" (Metropolis Conversation Series, 13, 2003). Looking at this in the context of the 1995 Quebec referendum or even in a post- referendum perspective, we can observe that the Canadian state has attempted and is still trying to impose the
Recommended publications
  • The Reference on Quebec Secession : a Positive Impact for All
    The Reference on Quebec Secession : a Positive Impact for All The Honourable Stéphane Dion 1 In September 2013, I travelled to Armenia, as a member of a parliamentary mission to investigate the situation of refugees fleeing the Syrian crisis. I was brought to Nagorno- Karabakh where the current government presented me with its statement of claim for international recognition of the territory as an independent State – even though it is also being claimed by Azerbaidjan. 2 On page 30 of the document, I found mention of the Reference on Quebec Secession 3 where it is pointed out that, according the Supreme Court of Canada, international law provides no legal foundation to unilateral secession in the context of a democracy but such a right might exist in another context. Based on that argument, and alleging that Azerbaijan is not a democracy, Nagorno-Karabakh calls on the international community to recognize it as a sovereign State. Few people realize how much of an international reference the unanimous August 20, 1998 Supreme Court ruling has become. In a world where almost all countries, including such great democracies as France or the USA, consider themselves as indivisible and where the notion of secession is often abhorred, the Supreme Court opinion seems very daring and liberal. The Court recognized the divisible character of the country. It accepted secession as a possibility but rejected the right to secede on demand. The Court also rejected the use of force or any form of violence. It emphasized clarity, legality, negotiation and justice for all. While the Court's opinion may appear idealistic to many nations, this is precisely because it sought to address, in an ideal manner, situations of breakup which are always complex and sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, March 23, 1999
    CANADA 1st SESSION 36th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 137 NUMBER 123 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, March 23, 1999 THE HONOURABLE GILDAS L. MOLGAT SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 995-5805 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2854 THE SENATE Tuesday, March 23, 1999 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. [English] Prayers. CANADIAN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETIC UNION BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 1999 VISITORS IN THE GALLERY CONGRATULATIONS TO SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY HUSKIES ON WINNING The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I should like to Hon. Wilfred P. Moore: Honourable senators, I rise today to draw to your attention some distinguished visitors in our gallery. make a statement in recognition of the achievement of the men’s They are the Honourable Joseph Sempe Lejaha, President of the varsity basketball team of Saint Mary’s University of Halifax, Senate of the Kingdom of Lesotho; and Honourable Ms Ntlhoi Nova Scotia. Motsamai, Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly of Lesotho. This past Sunday afternoon, the basketball Huskies, ranked Hon. Senators: Hear, hear! number seven in the nation, won the Canadian Intercollegiate Athletic Union championship in a thrilling 73-69 overtime victory over the number one ranked Alberta Golden Bears in a The Hon. the Speaker: On behalf of all senators, I bid you tournament played before a crowded Metro Centre in Halifax. welcome to the Senate of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliografía Y Fuentes De Información
    Bibliografía y Fuentes de Información a. Bibliografía y Hemerografía Aldecoa, Francisco y Michael Keating Paradiplomacy in Action, Frank Cass Publishers, London, 1999 Allison, Graham The Essence of Decision, Harper Collins Publishers, Harvard University, 1971 Bakvis, Herman Federalism and the role of the State, University or Toronto Press, Canadá, 1987 Balthazar, Louis, “The other side of Canada-U.S. Relations” en English, John Making a Difference? Canada’s foreign policy in a changing world order, Lester Publishing Limited, Toronto 1992 Balthazar, Louis e Alfred O. Hero Jr. Le Québec dans l’espace américain, Éditions Québec Amérique e Université McGill, Montréal, 1999 Basset, Claude “Regional Governments as International Actors-A Germane Terminology” (borrador/no publicado), Institut Québécois des Hautes Études Internationales, Décembre 2000. Bélanger, Louis “Globalization, Culture and Foreign Policy: The Failure of ‘Third Pillarization’ in Canada”, International Journal of Canadian Studies, No. 22 Fall, 2000, International Council for Canadian Studies, Ottawa Blanchette, Arthur Canadian Foreign Policy 1945-2000 Major Documents and Speeches, The Golden Dog Press, Ottawa, 2000 Bonanate, Luigi "Siete tesis sobre la globalización", Este País, No. 87, junio 1998 Brown, Bernard Comparative Politics, 8th edition, Wadsworth Publishing Co., California 1996 Brown, Craig La historia ilustrada de Canadá, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México 1994 Boeckelman, Keith “Federal Systems in the Globla Economy: Research Issues” en Publius, Winter 1996, Volume 26, Number 1 Burgess, Katrina Nuevos Temas, Nuevos Actores, ITAM,1994 Burgess, Michael “The Federal Spirit as a Moral Basis to Canadian Federalism”, International Journal of Canadian Studies, No. 22 Fall, 2000, International Council for Canadian Studies, Ottawa Cameron, Maxwell y Maureen Appel Molot Democracy and Foreign Policy, Carleton University Press, Ontario 1995 Cameron, David y Richard Simeon “Intergovernmental Relations and Democratic Citizenship”, pre- publication format, CCDM, 1999 Camilleri, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Constitutional Measures As an Alternative to Constitutional Amendment: Post-Meech Lake and Charlottetown
    Federalism-e: Volume 9 17 Non-Constitutional Measures as an Alternative to Constitutional Amendment: Post-Meech Lake and Charlottetown Jennifer Chisholm Dalhousie University Abstract The period spanning from the early 1980s to 1992 has been referred to as the era of constitutional federalism in Canada. One of the most significant events in Canadian history occurred on April 17, 1982, the patriation of the Canadian Constitution. Quebec did not sign the Constitution and for the following decade the country was dominated by the “high politics” of constitutional change. The Meech Lake Accord and the Charlottetown Accord respectively attempted to accommodate Quebec’s conditions for signing the document, however both failed. This paper describes the process and content of both Accords and the factors that led to their failure. It argues that Canada is better off due to the failure of these two proposed constitutional amendments. It also argues that subsequent non-constitutional measures introduced in the 1990s and 2000s have addressed many of the mega-constitutional concerns that these two accords attempted to tackle. The paper discusses some of the issues included in both Accords that have since been addressed through non-constitutional means, including: the recognition of Quebec as a distinct society; the federal government’s spending power; Aboriginal self- government; a veto for Quebec on certain constitutional amendments; and Senate reform. April 2008 Federalism-e: Volume 9 18 Introduction The period spanning from the early 1980s to 1992 has been referred to as the era of constitutional federalism in Canada. One of the most significant events in Canadian history occurred on April 17, 1982, the patriation of the Canadian Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of Lucien Bouchard
    QUÉ BEC'S POSITIONS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL ISSUES FROM 1936 TO MARCH 2001 GOVERNMENT OF the popular vote each time expressed LUCIEN BOUCHARD and that, each time, our democracy (JANUARY 29, 1996 TO MARCH 8, 2001) has grown in strength, our right to choose become that much stronger. [...] There is nothing more sacred in the democratic life of a people than its capacity to dispose of its own des- tiny. This is the very essence of their liberty.400 379.As a reaction to federal intervention in the Bertrand case, the Québec National Assembly adopted the fol- lowing resolution: “That the National Assembly reaffirm that the people of Daniel Lessard Québec are free to take charge of their own destiny, to define without ••• Status of Québec interference their political status and 377.In North America, Québec is the only to ensure their economic, social and society with a French-Speaking major- cultural development.”401 ity, a well-defined territorial base, and political institutions it controls. The 380.The only judge and jury on the future people of Québec possess all the tra- of Québec happens to be the people of ditional characteristics of a nation. Québec. No judge can stand in the [...] The Québec people subscribe to way of a people’s democratic expres- the democratic concept of a French- sion. The government of Québec will Speaking nation, pluralist in its culture, not go before the Supreme Court of and open to international immigration Canada regarding the federal govern- [...].399 ment’s Reference concerning the future of the Québec people.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    tribute to our volu n t e e r s To mark the invaluable contribution of volunteers to the welfare of humanity, in TABLE OF CONTENTS 1997 the United Nations General Assembly Message from the Chair and the Executive Director 2 decreed that 2001 would be the International Year of Volunteers. Continuity in our commitments 3 Decentralized offices 6 Financial statements 8 Americas Members of the Corporation and donors 12 Michelle Armand - Mathieu Asselin - Catherine Audet - Éric Audet - Marielle Bastien - Danielle Beaudoin - Anick Bernard Sylvie Bertrand - Stéphanie Bolduc - Christiane Bonneau Martin Boudreault - Jean-Guy Bourbonnais - Lise Bourque - André Bouvette - Mireille Brousseau - Franck Cabassu - Ian J.E. Cadieux - Emmanuelle Caron - France Carrière - Maria Cartagena - Patrice César - Marieke Cloutier - Stéphane Cover photos EDITING AND WRITING Cloutier - Gérard Côté - Zoé-Isabelle Côté - Julie Couët - Martin These pictures, all taken from Robert Hazel Couture - Jean Dahm - Catherine D’Anjou - Jean-François CECI’s photo library, show volun- Delorme-Lacasse - Sylvain Déry - Kim Descoteaux - Louise teers in action in developing CONTRIBUTIONS countries. Pierre Bellemare, Jocelyne Dallaire, Doucet - Marc Drouin - Guillaume Dufour - Éric Émond - Pierre Jean Despatie, Michael Gort, Farley - Mélany Faucher - Diane Fortier - Jean Fortin - Claude Roch Harvey and Luc Tremblay Gagné - Majorie Gagnon - Martin Gagnon - Anne Gallant Catherine Gauthier - Geneviève Gauthier - Anne-Marie Gervais TRANSLATION Mathieu Germain - Anne Gillespie - Annick Girard
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Cultural Difference Management Through Charles Taylor’S Philosophy: Case Studies from the Food Processing Industry
    Adm. Sci. 2015, 5, 46–70; doi:10.3390/admsci5020046 OPEN ACCESS administrative sciences ISSN 2076-3387 www.mdpi.com/journal/admsci Article Understanding Cultural Difference Management through Charles Taylor’s Philosophy: Case Studies from the Food Processing Industry Samuel Marleau Ouellet 1,†,*, Joseph Facal 2,† and Louis Hébert 2,† 1 Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development, Government of Canada, 125 Sussex Dr., Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2, Canada 2 Department of Management, HEC Montréal, 3000 Côte Ste-Catherine, Montréal, QC H3T 2A7, Canada; E-Mails: [email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (L.H.) † Signature indicate personal opinion and do not represent official positions of the department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada or the Government of Canada. * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Academic Editor: Joseph Roberts Received: 30 December 2014 / Accepted: 21 April 2015 / Published: 28 April 2015 Abstract: In this paper, we use the work of the philosopher, Charles Taylor, to investigate the role of culture on internationalization decisions. Using parameters related to key constructs such as positive liberty, social ontology, expressivism, civic republicanism and common spaces, we look at how culture influences the decisions regarding corporate international expansion. This framework was applied in a multi-interview design in four firms from the food processing industry from France and Canada. Results showed an obvious sensitivity to cultural difference and that managerial practices surrounding this issue tended to be intuitive and emergent. These practices were not crystallized in the form of a conscious and deliberate organizational strategy for dealing with cultural difference when planning foreign market entry.
    [Show full text]
  • DECEMBER 2004 – JANUARY 2005 Jean-Herman Guay
    LE PARTI QUÉBÉCOIS : AU-DELÀ DU CONFLIT DES AMBITIONS Jean-Herman Guay Le Parti québécois est une formation qui nous a habitués aux disputes internes, mais cette fois, note Jean-Herman Guay, les tensions sont plus profondes. Cette situation s’explique par quatre facteurs conjoncturels : un leadership installé à la va-vite en 2001, une défaite électorale cuisante en 2003, la redéfinition de l’aile radicale et l’espoir sensé d’une victoire électorale au prochain scrutin. Mais surtout, écrit-il, elle traduit la difficulté pour ce parti de jongler avec les deux faces de la souveraineté. Celle-ci n’est pas seulement un projet à réaliser, mais également un outil et un symbole. Avant même d’être réalisée, la souveraineté a ainsi généré des changements palpables et continue d’en générer, ce qui peut expliquer les apparents paradoxes d’une opinion publique qui appuie le projet de souveraineté mais ne souhaite pas la tenue d’un nouveau référendum. Pour le PQ, ce qui est en cause présentement, c’est la possibilité de faire cohabiter ces deux visages. Et devant ce défi, tous les protagonistes font face aux mêmes six dilemmes pour lesquels il n’y a pas de solution facile. L’issue du prochain congrès et plus largement l’avenir du Parti québécois reposent sur la façon dont on les résoudra. The Parti Québécois has a history of internal disputes, but this time, notes Jean- Herman Guay, tensions are running deeper. There are four reasons for this: a quickly installed leadership in 2001, a stinging electoral defeat in 2003, the redefinition of the party’s radical wing, and a reasonable hope of winning the next election.
    [Show full text]
  • Mémoire Des Délibérations Du Conseil Exécutif Séance Du 13 Octobre 1993 Sous La Présidence Du Premier Ministre Monsieur Ro
    MÉMOIRE DES DÉLIBÉRATIONS DU CONSEIL EXÉCUTIF SÉANCE DU 13 OCTOBRE 1993 À 11 H 00 SOUS LA PRÉSIDENCE DU PREMIER MINISTRE MONSIEUR ROBERT BOURASSA Membres du Conseil exécutif présents: Monsieur Robert Bourassa, Premier ministre Monsieur Gaston Blackburn, Ministre du Loisir, de la Chasse et de la Pêche Monsieur André Bourbeau, Ministre de la Main-d'oeuvre, de la Sécurité du revenu et de la Formation professionnelle Monsieur Lawrence Cannon, Ministre des Communications Monsieur Normand Cherry, Ministre du Travail; ministre délégué aux Communautés culturelles Monsieur John Ciaccia, Ministre des Affaires internationales Monsieur Albert Côté, Ministre des Forêts Monsieur Marc-Yvan Côté, Ministre de la Santé et des Services sociaux; ministre dé 1égué à 1a Réforme électorale Monsieur Robert Outil, Ministre des Approvisionnements et Services Monsieur Sam Elkas, Ministre des Transports Madame Monique Gagnon-Tremblay, Ministre des Communautés culturelles et de l'Immigration Monsieur Daniel Johnson, Ministre délégué à l'Administration et à la Fonction publique, Président du Conseil du trésor Monsieur Gérard D. Levesque, Ministre des Finances Monsieur Robert Middlemiss, Ministre délégué aux Transports Monsieur Pierre Paradis, Ministre de l'Environnement Monsieur Gil Rémillard, Ministre de la Justice; ministre délégué aux Affaires intergouver­ nementales canadiennes Madame Louise Robic, Ministre déléguée aux Finances Madame Lucienne Robillard, Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Science et Ministre de l'Ëducation Monsieur Claude Ryan, Ministre
    [Show full text]
  • Note De Recherche Par Hugo Roy Avec La Collaboration De Louise Campeau Sous La Direction De Yves Boisvert
    M3I Note de recherche par Hugo Roy avec la collaboration de Louise Campeau sous la direction de Yves Boisvert Dans le cadre du projet de recherche subventionné par le Fonds québécois de recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC) : Vers un nouveau cadre d’analyse en éthique appliquée : Consolidation théorique et évaluation de sa valeur heuristique à partir de l’éthique appliquée en contexte gouvernemental École Nationale d’Administration Publique 21 mai 2007 Table des matières Table des matières......................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 1. L’historique ............................................................................................................... 5 2. Les acteurs et leurs discours .................................................................................. 18 Marcel Côté............................................................................................................... 18 Mario Bertrand .......................................................................................................... 21 Pierre Jeanniot........................................................................................................... 22 Toby Gilsig ............................................................................................................... 23 Yves Payette.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assemblée Nationale Du Québec
    ASSEMBLÉE NATIONALE DEUXIÈME SESSION TRENTE-SIXIÈME LÉGISLATURE Journal des débats de l'Assemblée Le jeudi 6 décembre 2001 — Vol. 37 N° 67 Président de l'Assemblée nationale: M. Jean-Pierre Charbonneau QUÉBEC Abonnement annuel (TPS et TVQ en sus): Débats de l'Assemblée 145,00 $ Débats des commissions parlementaires 500,00 $ Pour une commission en particulier Commission de l'administration publique 75,00 $ Commission des affaires sociales 75,00 $ Commission de l'agriculture, des pêcheries et de l'alimentation 25,00 $ Commission de l'aménagement du territoire 100,00 $ Commission de l'Assemblée nationale 5,00 $ Commission de la culture 25,00 $ Commission de l'économie et du travail 100,00 $ Commission de l'éducation 75,00 $ Commission des finances publiques 75,00 $ Commission des institutions 100,00 $ Commission des transports et de l'environnement 100,00 $ Index (une session. Assemblée et commissions) 15,00 $ Achat à l'unité: prix variable selon le nombre de pages. Règlement par chèque à l'ordre du ministre des Finances et adressé comme suit Assemblée nationale du Québec Distribution des documents parlementaires 880, autoroute Dufferin-Montmorency, bureau 195 Québec, Qc G1R5P3 Téléphone: (418)643-2754 Télécopieur (418) 528-0381 Consultation des travaux parlementaires de l'Assemblée ou des commissions parlementaires sur Internet à l'adresse suivante: www.assnat.qc.ca Société canadienne des postes — Envoi de publications canadiennes Numéro de convention: 0592269 Dépôt légal: Bibliothèque nationale du Québec ISSN 0823-0102 Débats de l'Assemblée nationale Le jeudi 6 décembre 2001 Table des matières Présence du secrétaire de la Commission des relations extérieures de la Chambre des députés des Etats-Unis mexicains, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chahut Indescriptible Au Sénat
    TCtalCFE TOLE EMAILLEE Cest ror • Aéroport. Sl#-f oy 6 OCTOBRE 1990 CX€9EC NC SAMEDI '«PAÜCS T CAM<«S ♦ ? TAflLOC . \»iA Sv.>N A rVXfcL'A f ’ .» VU «f V*'** ♦'f «'•'Mf RaX’C S * VT» 1,35$ Le « Caligula de Baie-Comeau » contre Jacques « Lasagne » Hébert Qu’est-ce qui fait courir Guy Fournier ? L auteur du Chahut indescriptible au Sénat teieroman « Caligula de Baie-Comeau » I e gouvernement n'a pas IVpuis mai, l'opposition libe- « Jamais Après 24 heures d'un chahut indescriptible, un dernier (empereur romain qui avait tout peniu puisque les liberaux rale au Sen.it reclame une deux sans toi * t.ure d'une vingtaine de sénateurs liberaux, sur ri2. a demande nomme son cheval au Sénat 1 acceptent de considérer, dès « conference » avec la majonte est dans le une trêve aux conservateurs Mais chacun est reste sur scs pour Mars Clancv (Halifax), mardi, le projet de loi qui (vr conservatrice des Communes jus par-dessus positions et la guérilla peut recommencer des mardi tandis que Jacques Hebert de­ mettra de récupérer les ixm ■ Mais les questions de privi­ la tète. après-midi. venait <> Lisagne - l'ouï les de­ sions des contribuables gagnant lège qui ont declenche la pagail­ comme on dit. que l'on compare maintenant putes du Bloc québécois plus de 50 iVH> $ par année et le de jeudi soir demeurent, a il flirte avec aux « Wamors « d'Oka. et la imposera un»' taxe spéciale sur prévenu le leader adjoint des li- la schizo­ par Michal VASTtl quasi totalité des 54 sénateurs « C'est une premiere victoire les revenus des grandes compa tieraux au Sénat Royce 1-nth » u soaiL phrénie tous les jours au milieu des Lamoeh conservateurs, épuisés, mal que l'on ait ete capables de re­ gmes Cela représente des ren­ Ils réclament done que les votes des Duval, des Leœl D-l Ce n'est que vers 17 h hier soir rases, les joues creusees.
    [Show full text]