DOCSLIB.ORG

Quebec and Canada in the New Century New Dynamics, New Opportunities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quebec and Canada in the New Century New Dynamics, New Opportunities Canada: The State of the Federation 2005 Quebec and Canada in the New Century New Dynamics, New Opportunities Edited by Michael Murphy Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University McGill-Queen’s University Press Montreal & Kingston • London • Ithaca SOTF2005Prelims 1 5/16/07, 2:37 PM Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Library and Archives Canada has catalogued this publication as follows: Canada, the state of the federation Annual. 1985- Continues: Year in review (Kingston, Ont.), ISSN 0825-1207. ISSN 0827-0708 ISBN 978-1-55339-017-6 (2005 edition ; bound).—ISBN 978-1-55339-018-3 (2005 edition ; pbk.) 1. Federal-provincial relations—Canada—Periodicals. 2. Federal government— Canada—Periodicals. I. Queen’s University (Kingston, Ont.). Institute of Intergovernmental Relations II. Title: State of the federation. JL27.F42 1985- 321.02’3’0971 C86-030713-1 rev The Institute of Intergovernmental Relations The Institute is the only organization in Canada whose mandate is solely to promote research and communication on the challenges facing the federal system. Current research interests include fiscal federalism, health policy, the reform of federal po- litical institutions and the machinery of federal-provincial relations, Canadian federalism and the global economy, and comparative federalism. The Institute pursues these objectives through research conducted by its own staff and other scholars, through its publication program, and through seminars and conferences. The Institute links academics and practitioners of federalism in federal and provincial govern- ments and the private sector. The Institute of Intergovernmental Relations receives ongoing financial support from the J.A. Corry Memorial Endowment Fund, the Royal Bank of Canada Endowment Fund, the Government of Canada, and the governments of Manitoba and Ontario. We are grateful for this support which enables the Institute to sustain its extensive program of research, publication, and related activities. L’Institut des relations intergouvernementales L’Institut est le seul organisme canadien à se consacrer exclusivement à la recherche et aux échanges sur les questions du fédéralisme. Les priorités de recherche de l’Institut portent présentement sur le fédéralisme fiscal, la santé, la modification éventuelle des institutions politiques fédérales, les mécanismes de relations fédérales-provinciales, le fédéralisme canadien au regard de l’économie mondiale et le fédéralisme comparatif. L’Institut réalise ses objectifs par le biais de recherches effectuées par son personnel et par des chercheurs de l’Université Queen’s et d’ailleurs, de même que par des congrès et des colloques. L’Institut sert comme lien entre les universitaires, les fonctionnaires fédéraux et provinciaux et le secteur privé. L’Institut des relations intergouvernementales reçoit l’appui financier du J.A. Corry Memorial Endowment Fund, de la Fondation de la Banque Royale du Canada, du gouvernement du Canada et des gouvernements du Manitoba et de l’Ontario. Nous les remercions de cet appui qui permet à l’Institut de poursuivre son vaste programme de recherche et de publication ainsi que ses activités connexes. © Copyright 2007 ii SOTF2005Prelims 2 5/16/07, 2:37 PM CONTENTS v Foreword ix Contributors I Introduction 3 1. Introduction and Overview Thomas J. Courchene II Setting the Stage: Quebec Society and Politics 25 2. A New Chapter or the Same Old Story? Public Opinion in Quebec from 1996–2003 Matthew Mendelsohn, Andrew Parkin and Maurice Pinard 53 3. One never knows... Sait-on jamais? Guy Laforest 83 4. The Stalled Realignment: Quebec’s Party System After the 2003 Provincial Election A. Brian Tanguay III Challenging the Quebec Model 109 5. A Policy Network Perspective on the Quebec Model: Moving Beyond Simple Causation and Fights over Numbers Éric Montpetit 131 6. Globalization as a New Political Space: The End of the Quebec-Quebec Debate? Pascale Dufour 153 7. State Restructuring and the Failure of Competitive Nationalism: Trying Times for Quebec Labour Peter Graefe iii SOTF2005Prelims 3 5/16/07, 2:37 PM 177 8. The Politics of State/Civil Society Relations in Quebec Rachel Laforest IV Quebec/Canada Relations: New Dynamics, New Opportunities? 201 9. Quebec and the Canadian Federation: From the 1980 Referendum to the Summit of the Canadas Thomas J. Courchene 233 10. Breaking the “Vicious Cycle:” A Retrospective and Prospective Examination of Quebec/Canada Relations John Richards V Chronology 257 11. Year in Review 2005 Aron Seal iv SOTF2005Prelims 4 5/16/07, 2:37 PM FOREWORD In the period leading up to the Institute’s annual conference in 2003, the deci- sion was taken to revisit on an old but enduring theme in Canadian federalism – Quebec-Canada relations. Several factors influenced this decision. Following the 1995 referendum the country witnessed a steady decline in the intensity of the sovereignty debate. Public exhaustion with the issue and the apparent suc- cess of the Clarity Act in Quebec combined to deprive the Parti Québécois and Premier Lucien Bouchard of the winning conditions for a third and final referendum. Unable to advance the nationalist agenda, and weary of negotiat- ing the fractious internal politics of his own party, Bouchard resigned from politics in 2001 and the sovereignty struggle had lost its most eloquent champion since René Lévesque. Succeeding Bouchard as leader of the Parti Québécois, Bernard Landry proved equally unsuccessful at reviving the sovereignty agenda. Quebecers were seemingly more concerned about health care, education, employment and economic development, security, and the environment – the same issues dominating the public agenda in the rest of the country. Completing the picture, in the 2003 election the Parti Québécois was replaced by a Liberal government committed to federalism and a more con- structive relationship with the federal government. Could it be that we were on the verge of a fundamental transformation of Quebec society and politics, and a critical realignment of Quebec’s relation- ship with Canada and the rest of the world? Perhaps we were witnessing the rise of a new generation of Quebecers for whom the issue of sovereignty no longer constituted a viable or compelling challenge? Might the abatement of overt nationalist sentiment be attributed to the success of nationalist policies themselves, particularly those relating to the French language? Or perhaps fundamental change was not afoot in Quebec and it was only a matter of time before the right constellation of political circumstances once again fanned the flames of separatism? On 31 October 2003, the Institute of Intergovernmental Relations invited a group of established and emerging scholars to assess these new dynamics in Quebec society and politics, and to examine their implica- tions in the context of intergovernmental relations in Canada. The conference attracted over 25 speakers, and an audience of close to 100 academics, stu- dents, government officials and interested members of the general public. The v SOTF2005Prelims 5 5/16/07, 2:37 PM Keynote Address was delivered by M. Benoît Pelletier, Quebec’s Minister for Canadian Intergovernmental Affairs and Native Affairs. Canada: The State of the Federation 2005 gathers together a selection of these conference papers which have been peer-reviewed and substantially re- vised for publication. If there is an overall message in the volume it is that the national question continues to be central to Quebec’s internal politics and Quebec-Canada relations, but the tone and complexion of the nationalist de- bate is showing signs of change, and this may present fresh opportunities for constructive engagement between Quebec and the other members of the Ca- nadian federation. Viewed in the context of recent events, the essays in this volume are more timely than ever. After an extended period of absence, the national question was abruptly, and unexpectedly, thrust onto the public stage during the 2006 federal Liberal leadership race, soon to find its way even more unexpectedly into Parliament in the Harper government’s (ultimately successful) motion to recognize Quebec as a nation within a united Canada. With these events in tow, we now find ourselves on the eve of a Quebec Pro- vincial election pitting the frequently embattled Liberal government of Jean Charest against Parti Québécois newcomer André Boisclair, and ADQ leader Mario Dumont – still searching for a breakthrough with a new generation of Quebecers. Quebec will also be a key battlefield in the looming federal elec- tion. Under new leader Stéphane Dion, the federal Liberals will strive to rebuild their support base after the debacle of the sponsorship scandal, but will face a freshly invigorated Conservative party that seems increasingly within strik- ing distance of an elusive majority government. With both parties looking to pick up seats in Quebec, the depth of support enjoyed by the Bloc Québécois and its sovereignty message will also be on trial. For those with an interest in the future of Quebec and its place in the Canadian federation, this volume should prove to be stimulating and informative reading. Credit is due to a number of individuals and organizations, without whom the conference and the book would not have been possible. First and foremost a warm thank you to our generous sponsors for their financial and logistical support: the Privy Council of Canada the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Government of Quebec, and the Canadian Network of Federalism Studies. A very special thanks to Harvey Lazar for his work in developing the thematic architecture of the conference and for host- ing the event with such skill and good humor. Thanks also to Daniel Salée for his contribution to the intellectual development of the project, for his edito- rial assistance, and for an excellent job as a rapporteur on the final day of the conference. As ever, Mary Kennedy and Patti Candido carried the weight of the conference organization on their shoulders, and played a vital role in see- ing the volume through to publication.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Culture of Canada
    CHAPTER 2 The Political Culture of Canada LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this chapter you should be able to • Define the terms political culture, ideology, and cleavages. • Describe the main principles of each of the major ideologies in Canada. • Describe the ideological orientation of the main political parties in Canada. • Describe the major cleavages in Canadian politics. Introduction Canadian politics, like politics in other societies, is a public conflict over different conceptions of the good life. Canadians agree on some important matters (e.g., Canadians are overwhelmingly committed to the rule of law, democracy, equality, individual rights, and respect for minorities) and disagree on others. That Canadians share certain values represents a substantial consensus about how the political system should work. While Canadians generally agree on the rules of the game, they dis- agree—sometimes very strongly—on what laws and policies the government should adopt. Should governments spend more or less? Should taxes be lower or higher? Should governments build more prisons or more hospitals? Should we build more pipelines or fight climate change? Fortunately for students of politics, different conceptions of the good life are not random. The different views on what laws and policies are appropriate to realize the ideologies Specific bundles of good life coalesce into a few distinct groupings of ideas known as ideologies. These ideas about politics and the good ideologies have names that are familiar to you, such as liberalism, conservatism, and life, such as liberalism, conserva- (democratic) socialism, which are the principal ideologies in Canadian politics. More tism, and socialism. Ideologies radical ideologies, such as Marxism, communism, and fascism, are at best only mar- help people explain political ginally present in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..104 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 116 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 11, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7131 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 11, 2003 The House met at 2 p.m. challenged clients received a donation from Sun Country Cable, a donation that will enable the centre to continue its work in our Prayers community. Sun Country Cable donated the building. This building is next to Kindale's existing facility and both properties will eventually lead to construction of a new centre. In the meantime, the Ï (1405) building will be used for training and respite suites. [English] I am proud to be part of a community that looks out for those less The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing fortunate. Charity does begin at home. O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Winnipeg North Centre. *** [Editor's Note: Members sang the national anthem] [Translation] SOCIÉTÉ RADIO-CANADA STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Mr. Bernard Patry (Pierrefonds—Dollard, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I would like to share some of my concerns about the recent decision [English] by Société Radio-Canada to cancel its late evening sports news. CHABAD Hon. Art Eggleton (York Centre, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I rise to I am worried, because last year this crown corporation had also decided to stop broadcasting the Saturday night hockey games, La pay tribute to Chabad Lubavitch which is the world's largest network Soirée du hockey.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief by Professor François Larocque Research Chair In
    BRIEF BY PROFESSOR FRANÇOIS LAROCQUE RESEARCH CHAIR IN LANGUAGE RIGHTS UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA PRESENTED TO THE SENATE STANDING COMMITTEE ON OFFICIAL LANGUAGES AS PART OF ITS STUDY OF THE OFFICIAL LANGUAGES REFORM PROPOSAL UNVEILED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2021, BY THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND OFFICIAL LANGUAGES, ENGLISH AND FRENCH: TOWARDS A SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY OF OFFICIAL LANGUAGES IN CANADA MAY 31, 2021 Professor François Larocque Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa 57 Louis Pasteur Ottawa, ON K1J 6N5 Telephone: 613-562-5800, ext. 3283 Email: [email protected] 1. Thank you very much to the honourable members of the Senate Standing Committee on Official Languages (the “Committee”) for inviting me to testify and submit a brief as part of the study of the official languages reform proposal entitled French and English: Towards a Substantive Equality of Official Languages in Canada (“the reform proposal”). A) The reform proposal includes ambitious and essential measures 2. First, I would like to congratulate the Minister of Economic Development and Official Languages for her leadership and vision. It is, in my opinion, the most ambitious official languages reform proposal since the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“CA1982”)1 and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (“Charter”),2 which enshrined the main provisions of the Official Languages Act (“OLA”)3 of 1969 in the Canadian Constitution. The last reform of the OLA was in 1988 and it is past time to modernize it to adapt it to Canada’s linguistic realities and challenges in the 21st century. 3. The Charter and the OLA proclaim that “English and French are the official languages of Canada and have equality of status and equal rights and privileges as to their use in all institutions of the Parliament and government of Canada.”4 In reality, however, as reported by Statistics Canada,5 English is dominant everywhere, while French is declining, including in Quebec.
    [Show full text]
  • Procès-Verbal 1Er Octobre-Drummondville
    CONSEIL NATIONAL XVI-5 1er OCTOBRE 2011 DRUMMONDVILLE XVI-5-1 MOT DE BIENVENUE PAR LE PRÉSIDENT DU CONSEIL EXÉCUTIF NATIONAL.……………………………………………….………………………………2 XVI-5-2 OUVERTURE DU CONSEIL NATIONAL ET NOMINATION À LA PRÉSIDENCE ET AU SECRÉTARIAT D’ASSEMBLÉE..........................................………………………2 XVI-5-3 ADOPTION DE L’ORDRE DU JOUR………………………………………..............…2 XVI-5-4 ADOPTION DU PROCÈS-VERBAL DU CONSEIL NATIONAL DES 23 ET 24 OCTOBRE 2010............................................................................... 3 XVI-5-5 PRÉSENTATION DES POSTES DE VICE-PRÉSIDENTE, DE VICE-PRÉSIDENT À L’ORGANISATION, À LA MOBILISATION ET À LA FORMATION, DE SECRÉTAIRE NATIONALE ET DE TRÉSORIÈRE NATIONALE AU CONSEIL EXÉCUTIF NATIONAL……..………………………….…………………..………………..…….....3 XVI-5-6 ADOPTION DES STATUTS DU PARTI QUÉBÉCOIS………………………………….3 XVI-5-7 ADOPTION DU PROGRAMME DU PARTI QUÉBÉCOIS ........................................ 3 XVI-5-8 PRÉSENTATION DU DÉROULEMENT DES ÉLECTIONS À LA COMMISSION POLITIQUE PAR LA PRÉSIDENCE D’ÉLECTION ..................................................... 3 XVI-5-9 RAPPORTS............................................................................................................. 3 XVI-5-9-1 RAPPORT DU COMITÉ NATIONAL DES JEUNES.…………………………………...3 XVI-5-9-2 RAPPORT DU PRÉSIDENT DE LA CAMPAGNE DE FINANCEMENT 2011…...……3 XVI-5-9-3 RAPPORT DU LEADER DE L’AILE PARLEMENTAIRE ET PRÉSENTATION DU COMITÉ DES DÉPUTÉS SUR LE RENOUVEAU DÉMOCRATIQUE……………..…...4 XVI-5-10 DISCOURS……………………………………………………………….……………….4 XVI-5-10-1 DISCOURS
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliament
    The Parliament is composed of 3 distinct elements,the Queen1 the Senate and the House of Representatives.2 These 3 elements together characterise the nation as being a constitutional monarchy, a parliamentary democracy and a federation. The Constitution vests in the Parliament the legislative power of the Common- wealth. The legislature is bicameral, which is the term commoniy used to indicate a Par- liament of 2 Houses. Although the Queen is nominally a constituent part of the Parliament the Consti- tution immediately provides that she appoint a Governor-General to be her representa- tive in the Commonwealth.3 The Queen's role is little more than titular as the legislative and executive powers and functions of the Head of State are vested in the Governor- General by virtue of the Constitution4, and by Letters Patent constituting the Office of Governor-General.5 However, while in Australia, the Sovereign has performed duties of the Governor-General in person6, and in the event of the Queen being present to open Parliament, references to the Governor-General in the relevant standing orders7 are to the extent necessary read as references to the Queen.s The Royal Style and Titles Act provides that the Queen shall be known in Australia and its Territories as: Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth.* There have been 19 Governors-General of Australia10 since the establishment of the Commonwealth, 6 of whom (including the last 4) have been Australian born. The Letters Patent, of 29 October 1900, constituting the office of Governor- General, 'constitute, order, and declare that there shall be a Governor-General and Commander-in-Chief in and over' the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Pour Une Plate-Forme Électorale
    SORTIR DE L’IMPASSE! Jean-Claude St-André L’auteur a été député de L’Assomption sous la bannière du parti québécois du 10 juin 1996 au 26 mars 2007. Il s’est présenté à la chefferie du parti québécois en 2005. Les Québécois veulent du changement! Maintenant plus que jamais, il faut nous retrousser les manches pour offrir aux Québécois une autre façon de faire de la politique. Nous savons aussi que les politiciens en place, que ce soit Jean Charest ou Pauline Marois, n’écoutent plus la population. Les politiciens sont sourds et aveugles aux préoccupations quotidiennes des citoyens. Nous sentons que le Québec est fort ! Cette force, elle cherche à se libérer, à s’exprimer… Les Québécois ne redoutent plus le changement, mais ils l’attendent et ils l’appellent de tous leurs vœux! Cette force, cette volonté de changement, les Québécois l’ont clairement exprimé lors du scrutin fédéral du 2 mai dernier. Ils ont mis à la porte de vieux politiciens incrustés confortablement dans leurs sièges depuis plus de 20 ans. Des politiciens à la langue de bois capables de parler pour le Québec, mais incapables d’agir pour le Québec… Le 2 mai dernier, j’ai finalement voté NPD. Pourquoi? Lors du déclenchement de la campagne électorale, j’avais pourtant l’intention de voter pour le Bloc, et ce, malgré son discours timorée, ambigu, voire démissionnaire sur la question nationale. Après le passage de Gilles Duceppe au Congrès du Parti québécois et l’appui inconditionnel du chef bloquiste à l’approche suicidaire mise de l’avant par la direction péquiste, j’ai décidé de sanctionner le PQ.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the National Assembly of Québec 2011 2012
    activity report of the National Assembly of Québec 2011 2012 national assembly oF Québec Parliament building Québec (Québec) G1a 1a3 assnat.qc.ca [email protected] 1 866 DéPUTÉS assnat.qc.ca Front cover: The bell tower rises above the coats of arms sculpted in high relief on the facade of the Parliament Building. Photo: Christian Chevalier, National Assembly Collection activity report of the National Assembly of Québec 2011 2012 assnat.qc.ca This publication was prepared in collaboration with the senior management and the personnel of all the administrative units of the National Assembly. Unless otherwise specified, the information in this activity report covers the National Assembly’s activities from 1 April 2011 to 31 March 2012. Supervision Jean Dumas Coordination and Editing Laurie Comtois Drafting Committee Louisette Cameron Catherine Durepos Mario Gagnon Lucie Laliberté Suzanne Langevin Revision Éliane de Nicolini Translation Sylvia Ford Indexing Rénald Buteau Graphic Design Manon Paré Page Layout Catherine Houle Photography National Assembly Collection Clément Allard, photographer Christian Chevalier, photographer Marc-André Grenier, photographer Renaud Philippe, photographer Roch Théroux, photographer With the participation of: French National Assembly (p. 65) Parliamentary Assembly of the Francophonie (p. 54) Debates Broadcasting and Publishing Directorate (p. 43, 44, 47) Education in Parliamentary Democracy Directorate (p. 84, 89) Guy Rainville, photographer (p. 52) Maynor Solís Calderón, photographer (p. 59) Organisation
    [Show full text]
  • Justeet Equitable
    Pour la negociationd'un traite juste et equitable Rapport du mandataire spécial du gouvernement du Québec M. Guy Chevrette Concernant la proposition d'entente de principe d'ordre général avec les Innus de Mamuitun 2003 et de Nutashkuan JANVIER Pour la négociation d'un traité juste et équitable Table des matières 1. PRÉAMBULE. 5 2. LES GRANDS CONSTATS . 7 3. LES TERRITOIRES EN CAUSE ET LES PRINCIPES ET MODALITÉS QUI S’Y APPLIQUERAIENT. 11 3.1 Le Nitassinan. 11 3.1.1 La propriété . 11 3.1.2 L’étendue. 11 3.1.3 Les activités traditionnelles de chasse, de pêche, de trappe et de cueillette (Innu Aitun) . 12 3.1.4 La participation au développement. 14 a) Forêt, mines et pourvoiries. 14 b) Parcs, réserve faunique et aires d’aménagement et de développement. 15 3.1.5 La participation aux processus gouvernementaux de la gestion du territoire . 16 3.1.6 Les redevances. 16 3.2 L’Innu Assi . 16 3.2.1 L’autonomie gouvernementale. 17 3.2.2 L’autonomie financière. 17 3.2.3 Les droits des tiers sur l’Innu Assi . 18 3.2.4 Les cas particuliers de Nutashkuan et d’Essipit . 19 4. LE PROCESSUS DE NÉGOCIATION ET AUTRES CONSIDÉRATIONS . 21 4.1 La participation au processus de négociation et d’information. 21 4.2 La participation aux processus postnégociation . 22 4.3 Le cas de Sept-Îles et de Uashat-Maliotenam . 22 4.4 La clause concernant la Constitution de 1982 . 22 4.5 Référendum ou consultation . 23 CONCLUSION . 25 RECOMMANDATIONS . 27 ANNEXES A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reference on Quebec Secession : a Positive Impact for All
    The Reference on Quebec Secession : a Positive Impact for All The Honourable Stéphane Dion 1 In September 2013, I travelled to Armenia, as a member of a parliamentary mission to investigate the situation of refugees fleeing the Syrian crisis. I was brought to Nagorno- Karabakh where the current government presented me with its statement of claim for international recognition of the territory as an independent State – even though it is also being claimed by Azerbaidjan. 2 On page 30 of the document, I found mention of the Reference on Quebec Secession 3 where it is pointed out that, according the Supreme Court of Canada, international law provides no legal foundation to unilateral secession in the context of a democracy but such a right might exist in another context. Based on that argument, and alleging that Azerbaijan is not a democracy, Nagorno-Karabakh calls on the international community to recognize it as a sovereign State. Few people realize how much of an international reference the unanimous August 20, 1998 Supreme Court ruling has become. In a world where almost all countries, including such great democracies as France or the USA, consider themselves as indivisible and where the notion of secession is often abhorred, the Supreme Court opinion seems very daring and liberal. The Court recognized the divisible character of the country. It accepted secession as a possibility but rejected the right to secede on demand. The Court also rejected the use of force or any form of violence. It emphasized clarity, legality, negotiation and justice for all. While the Court's opinion may appear idealistic to many nations, this is precisely because it sought to address, in an ideal manner, situations of breakup which are always complex and sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Temps De Parole
    VOLUME 19, NUMÉRO 2, JUIN 2018 LE TEMPS DE PAROLE 50e anniversaire du Parti québécois L’assemblée générale annuelle du 16 mai 2018 Le mandat d’initiative sur la place des femmes en politique TABLE DES MATIÈRES LES PREMIERS MINISTRES PÉQUISTES 3 Mot du rédacteur DU QUÉBEC L’ASSEMBLÉE GÉNÉRALE ANNUELLE 4 Conseil d’administration 2018-2019 René Lévesque, 1976-1985 5 Rapport du président Fonds Assemblée nationale du Québec 9 Rapports des comités Photographe : Kedl 12 Prix de l’Amicale 17 Sous l’œil des photographes 50E ANNIVERSAIRE DU PARTI QUÉBÉCOIS 22 Le Parti québécois : un demi-siècle d’existence 27 Le gouvernement Lévesque : la deuxième phase Pierre Marc Johnson, 1985 de la Révolution tranquille Fonds Assemblée nationale du Québec Photographe : Kedl 31 Le gouvernement Parizeau propose la souveraineté du Québec 35 Le gouvernement Bouchard : redressement économique et progrès social 38 Le gouvernement Landry : miser sur le développement économique et la justice sociale 41 Le gouvernement Marois : un mandat bref, un bilan étoffé Jacques Parizeau, 1994-1996 Fonds Assemblée nationale du Québec AFFAIRES COURANTES Photographe : Daniel Lessard 45 La place des femmes en politique JE ME SOUVIENS 48 Le cimetière de la guerre de Sept Ans 51 Coups de crayon! La satire politique en dessins Lucien Bouchard, 1996-2001 EN PREMIÈRE LECTURE Fonds Assemblée nationale du Québec 52 En première lecture Photographe : Daniel Lessard EN DEUXIÈME LECTURE 55 Les Prix du livre politique de l’Assemblée nationale À L’ÉCRAN 56 Mémoires de députés Bernard Landry, 2001-2003 Fonds Assemblée nationale du Québec ANCIENS ET ANCIENNES PARLEMENTAIRES EN ACTION Photographe : Daniel Lessard 58 Anciens parlementaires en action 63 Songhaï : une Afrique qui relève la tête SOUVENONS-NOUS DE ..
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, March 23, 1999
    CANADA 1st SESSION 36th PARLIAMENT VOLUME 137 NUMBER 123 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, March 23, 1999 THE HONOURABLE GILDAS L. MOLGAT SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates: Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 995-5805 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2854 THE SENATE Tuesday, March 23, 1999 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. [English] Prayers. CANADIAN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETIC UNION BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 1999 VISITORS IN THE GALLERY CONGRATULATIONS TO SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY HUSKIES ON WINNING The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I should like to Hon. Wilfred P. Moore: Honourable senators, I rise today to draw to your attention some distinguished visitors in our gallery. make a statement in recognition of the achievement of the men’s They are the Honourable Joseph Sempe Lejaha, President of the varsity basketball team of Saint Mary’s University of Halifax, Senate of the Kingdom of Lesotho; and Honourable Ms Ntlhoi Nova Scotia. Motsamai, Deputy Speaker of the National Assembly of Lesotho. This past Sunday afternoon, the basketball Huskies, ranked Hon. Senators: Hear, hear! number seven in the nation, won the Canadian Intercollegiate Athletic Union championship in a thrilling 73-69 overtime victory over the number one ranked Alberta Golden Bears in a The Hon. the Speaker: On behalf of all senators, I bid you tournament played before a crowded Metro Centre in Halifax. welcome to the Senate of Canada.
    [Show full text]