DOCSLIB.ORG

Army and Marine Corps Ground System Modernization Programs Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

i [H.A.S.C. No. 112–114] ARMY AND MARINE CORPS GROUND SYSTEM MODERNIZATION PROGRAMS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION HEARING HELD MARCH 8, 2012 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 73–440 WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, Maryland, Chairman FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey SILVESTRE REYES, Texas JOHN C. FLEMING, M.D., Louisiana MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina TOM ROONEY, Florida JIM COOPER, Tennessee TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania NIKI TSONGAS, Massachusetts VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri LARRY KISSELL, North Carolina JON RUNYAN, New Jersey MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico MARTHA ROBY, Alabama BILL OWENS, New York WALTER B. JONES, North Carolina JOHN R. GARAMENDI, California W. TODD AKIN, Missouri MARK S. CRITZ, Pennsylvania JOE WILSON, South Carolina KATHLEEN C. HOCHUL, New York MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio JACKIE SPEIER, California BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado JOHN WASON, Professional Staff Member DOUG BUSH, Professional Staff Member SCOTT BOUSUM, Staff Assistant (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2012 Page HEARING: Thursday, March 8, 2012, Army and Marine Corps Ground System Mod- ernization Programs ............................................................................................. 1 APPENDIX: Thursday, March 8, 2012 ........................................................................................ 33 THURSDAY, MARCH 8, 2012 ARMY AND MARINE CORPS GROUND SYSTEM MODERNIZATION PROGRAMS STATEMENTS PRESENTED BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Bartlett, Hon. Roscoe G., a Representative from Maryland, Chairman, Sub- committee on Tactical Air and Land Forces ...................................................... 1 Reyes, Hon. Silvestre, a Representative from Texas, Ranking Member, Sub- committee on Tactical Air and Land Forces ...................................................... 3 WITNESSES Lennox, LTG Robert P., USA, Deputy Chief Of Staff, G–8, U.S. Army; and LTG William N. Phillips, USA, Military Deputy to the Assistant Secretary (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology), U.S. Army ......................................... 5 Mills, LtGen Richard P., USMC, Deputy Commandant for Combat Develop- ment and Integration, U.S. Marine Corps; BGen Frank L. Kelley, USMC, Commander, Systems Command, U.S. Marine Corps; and William E. Tay- lor, Program Executive Officer for Land Systems, U.S. Marine Corps ........... 6 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS: Bartlett, Hon. Roscoe G. .................................................................................. 37 Lennox, LTG Robert P., joint with LTG William N. Phillips ....................... 42 Mills, LtGen Richard P., joint with BGen Frank L. Kelley and William E. Taylor ........................................................................................................ 57 Reyes, Hon. Silvestre ....................................................................................... 40 DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD: [There were no Documents submitted.] WITNESS RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED DURING THE HEARING: Ms. Speier ......................................................................................................... 73 QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING: Mr. Bartlett ....................................................................................................... 77 Mr. Bartlett and Mr. Shuster .......................................................................... 83 Mr. Critz ............................................................................................................ 87 Mr. LoBiondo and Mr. Rooney ........................................................................ 84 Mr. Owens ......................................................................................................... 86 (III) IV Page QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY MEMBERS POST HEARING—Continued Mrs. Roby .......................................................................................................... 87 Mr. Rooney ........................................................................................................ 86 Mr. Shuster ....................................................................................................... 85 Ms. Tsongas ...................................................................................................... 86 Mr. Turner ........................................................................................................ 84 ARMY AND MARINE CORPS GROUND SYSTEM MODERNIZATION PROGRAMS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES, Washington, DC, Thursday, March 8, 2012. The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:02 a.m. in room 2212, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Roscoe G. Bartlett (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. ROSCOE G. BARTLETT, A REP- RESENTATIVE FROM MARYLAND, CHAIRMAN, SUB- COMMITTEE ON TACTICAL AIR AND LAND FORCES Mr. BARTLETT. Good morning. Because of the importance of to- day’s hearing, I apologize that my opening statement will be a little longer than usual. The Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee meets today to receive testimony on the fiscal year 2013 budget request for the Army and Marine Corps ground system modernization programs. We welcome our distinguished panel of witnesses: Lieutenant General Robert Lennox, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Army, G–8; Lieutenant General William Phillips, Military Deputy to the Assist- ant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics, and Tech- nology; Lieutenant General Richard Mills, United States Marine Corps, Deputy Commandant for Combat Development and Integra- tion; Brigadier General Frank Kelley, United States Marine Corps, Commander, Systems Command; and Mr. William Taylor, United States Marine Corps, Program Executive Officer for Land Systems. Thank all of you for being here and for your service to our Na- tion. Based on the fiscal year 2013 budget request, the subcommittee hopes to determine: one, the risk associated with the Army and Marine Corps’ ability to meet the national security needs of this Nation; two, how this budget request impacts Army and Marine Corps ground systems modernization programs and their associ- ated industrial bases; and, three, the best estimate of what pro- gram adjustments would have to be made and additional risk as- sumed if sequestration were to take effect. We know that our witnesses support this budget as appropriate for the new defense guidance, but we need our witnesses to provide more detail on the modernization and investment risks and the critical assumptions behind these risks given the fact that the Na- tion is still engaged in major combat operations. There are two significant concerns that I have that are associ- ated with Army and Marine Corps ground systems modernization: (1) 2 one, the quality and effectiveness of the equipment that will be re- lied upon by a smaller combat force as a result of reductions in force structure and end strength; and, two, the effect on the indus- trial base of ending major current programs and anticipating the ability to begin new production 3 to 5 years into the future. I have concerns over the impact of this budget on the defense in- dustrial base at the prime-contractor and vendor-base level. Based on this budget request, the industrial base that supports the Ma- rine Corps at the battalion level and the Army at the brigade-com- bat-team level is going to have a 3- to 5-year production break. Both the Marine Corps and the Army plan on procuring major plat- forms into the 2017 or 2018 timeframe. At the prime-contractor level, the ranking member and I have visited many of these facilities. The workers are well-trained, very qualified, and extremely patriotic. As you know, it can take many years to train a qualified machinist or welder. Many of them have served in the military and have families and friends that are cur- rently in the military. However, if these production lines go com- pletely cold for multiple years, these workers will have no choice but to switch career fields so that they can take care of their fami- lies. So the question becomes, what workforce does the Marine Corps and the Army expect to have or need in 2017 and 2018 to produce these new platforms? What impact would this industrial-base pol- icy have on the industrial base’s ability to surge production in re- sponse to a future threat or conflict? The vendor-base level is even more problematic. These are the companies that provide the transmissions, engines, and widgets to the prime contractors. In some cases, it can take over a year for a vendor to get qualified in order to supply critical parts to the prime contractors. Once the production lines go cold, these companies will simply go away or be forced to increase prices for these components and parts. If they do, what will be the impact to current fielded ground modernization system programs? And in 2017, will the prime con- tractors be forced to go overseas to fill this void? Our prime con- tractors and vendors are trying to sustain themselves at a min- imum economic quantity level. This may not
Recommended publications
  • Oshkosh Defense Overview

    Oshkosh Defense Overview

    INNOVATION DRIVES FORWARD Oshkosh Defense Overview FEDNOR Road to Defence 27 March 2017 Contact: David L. Jensen, Director, Defense International Offsets/Industrial Participation Oshkosh Defense, LLC Phone: 920-233-9227 E-mail:Company [email protected] Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 1 Oshkosh Corporation Today Established: 1917 FY15 Sales: $6.1 billion Fortune Ranking: 394 Headquarters: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Operations: Our Mission: To partner with customers to Manufacturing in seven countries deliver superior solutions that safely and Service centers in 23 countries efficiently move people and materials at work, around the globe and around the clock Six new product development facilities Employees: 12,000+ Customer Reach: 130 countries NYSE: OSK Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 2 A Family of Industry Leading Brands Pierce Manufacturing (1996) Jerr-Dan Corporation (2004) Nova Quintech (1997) CON-E-CO (2005) McNeilus Companies (1998) London Machinery Inc. (2005) Kewaunee Fabrications (1999) AK Specialty Vehicles (2006) Viking Truck & Equipment (1999) Iowa Mold Tooling (IMT) (2006) TEMCO (2001) JLG Industries (2006) TRANSFORMING OSHKOSH INTO A GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL 3 Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 3 Working Together to Move the World at Work Values, Mission, MOVE Strategy Oshkosh Operating System Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 4 Oshkosh Corporation
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

    Case 1:07-cv-01655-LJO-SAB Document 108 Filed 11/04/13 Page 1 of 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 PINNACLE ARMOR, INC., 1:07-CV-01655 LJO DLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER RE CROSS MOTIONS FOR 6 SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCS. 98 & v. 99) 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 8 Defendant. 9 10 I. INTRODUCTION 11 Plaintiff Pinnacle Armor, Inc. (“Pinnacle” or “Plaintiff”) produces armor designed to protect 12 buildings, vehicles, and the human body. Doc. 6, Verified First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) at ¶ 2.1 13 Among Pinnacle’s primary customers are local law enforcement agencies that often utilize federal 14 subsidies to purchase body armor. See id. at ¶¶ 4-5, 22. Availability of at least one such subsidy is 15 conditioned upon certification that the body armor was manufactured in compliance with the most recent 16 standards set by the National Institute of Justice (“NIJ”), an arm of the U.S. Department of Justice 17 18 (“DOJ”). Id. at ¶ 4. In the FAC, Pinnacle alleged that NIJ’s decision to revoke certification for one of 19 Pinnacle’s products: (1) violated Pinnacle’s procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment; 20 and (2) was “arbitrary and capricious” in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 21 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). Id. at ¶¶ 42-57.2 Id. 22 On March 11, 2008, the district court dismissed both claims, holding that Pinnacle’s interest in 23 NIJ certification is not a protected property right under the due process clause, and that NIJ’s 24 1 25 Normally, the Court would cite the Revised Administrative Record (“RAR”) for foundational facts such as this.
  • The Bears Pit

    The Bears Pit

    Subject: Weapons & Items Requests for UC-1.13/DL-1.13/AFS Posted by Wil473 on Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:28:31 GMT View Forum Message <> Reply to Message Looks like Smeagol beat me to creating one of these. As I am sharing items between the three mods, spinning out a thread for weapon and item requests. Please include at a minimum: - link to more information - rational why I should be adding your favourite gun to three different mods (I've included a list of weapons already in-mod to avoid embarrassing incidents of duplication) - description to item (bonus points if it is usable in-game) - graphics (bonus points if they are usable in-game, and you are the artist so I don't need to track anyone down for permission) Note, that with New Magazine System (NMS) in the works, this thread will be mostly to gather information for future "Advance Capability" versions of the mods that will be created after the current "offical" cycle of v1.13 releases. Specifically NMS, so far, has a few features that not only simplifies adding unique magazine capacities and multiple magazine capacities, but on considering what ChrisL has already stated to be his plans for NMS, features that can be exploited (ie. not ChrisL's intention, but I plan on abusing it for this purpose) to make supporting a common item list between multiple mods much easier... EDIT (2016/10/03): This thread has been replaced by The 2nd Weapons & Items Requests for UC-1.13/DL-1.13/AFS noticed the list was broken when clearing the Sticky flag on this thread.
  • National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For

    National Guard and Reserve Equipment Report (NGRER) For

    NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVE EQUIPMENT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 (NGRER FY 2018) (In Accordance with Section 10541, Title 10, United States Code) March 2017 Prepared by Department of Defense Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Readiness Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Readiness Programming and Resources) COL Samuel R. Cook, Editor Washington, DC 20301-1500 The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $896,000 in Fiscal Years 2016–2017. This includes $212,000 in expenses and $684,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017Feb15 RefID: A-9CB6C19 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview I. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges (Operational & Strategic Reserve Forces) 1-1 II. Scope of the Report 1-3 III. Equipment Shortages 1-4 IV. Equipment Procurement 1-5 V. Reserve Component Equipping Challenges 1-7 A. Army National Guard (ARNG) 1-7 B. Army Reserve (AR) 1-8 C. United States Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) 1-8 D. United States Navy Reserve (USNR) 1-9 E. Air National Guard (ANG) 1-9 F. Air Force Reserve (AFR) 1-10 G. United States Coast Guard Reserve (USCGR) 1-11 Chapter 2 United States Army Reserve Components I. Army Overview 2-1 A. Army Planning Guidance 2-1 B. Army Equipping Guidance 2-2 C. Plan to Fill Mobilization Shortages in the RC 2-2 D. Initiatives Affecting RC Equipment 2-3 E. Army Plan to Achieve Full Compatibility between AC and RC 2-3 F. Army Equipping Assessment 2-3 G. Army Component Equipment Modernization 2-4 II. Army National Guard Overview 2-6 A.
  • Small Arms for Urban Combat

    Small Arms for Urban Combat

    Small Arms for Urban Combat This page intentionally left blank Small Arms for Urban Combat A Review of Modern Handguns, Submachine Guns, Personal Defense Weapons, Carbines, Assault Rifles, Sniper Rifles, Anti-Materiel Rifles, Machine Guns, Combat Shotguns, Grenade Launchers and Other Weapons Systems RUSSELL C. TILSTRA McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Tilstra, Russell C., ¡968– Small arms for urban combat : a review of modern handguns, submachine guns, personal defense weapons, carbines, assault rifles, sniper rifles, anti-materiel rifles, machine guns, combat shotguns, grenade launchers and other weapons systems / Russell C. Tilstra. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-6523-1 softcover : acid free paper 1. Firearms. 2. Urban warfare—Equipment and supplies. I. Title. UD380.T55 2012 623.4'4—dc23 2011046889 BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING DATA ARE AVAILABLE © 2012 Russell C. Tilstra. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Front cover design by David K. Landis (Shake It Loose Graphics) Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Jefferson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To my wife and children for their love and support. Thanks for putting up with me. This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations . viii Preface . 1 Introduction . 3 1. Handguns . 9 2. Submachine Guns . 33 3.
  • U.S. Army and Marine Corps Equipment Requirements: Background and Issues for Congress

    U.S. Army and Marine Corps Equipment Requirements: Background and Issues for Congress

    = __=72>=&3)= &7.3*=4758=6:.52*39= *6:.7*2*398a=&(0,74:3)=&3)=88:*8=+47= 43,7*88= 3)7*<= *.(0*79= 5*(.&1.89=.3= .1.9&7>=74:3)=47(*8= &3:&7>=,3`=,**2= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= --1/1= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress __=72>=&3)= &7.3*=4758=6:.52*39=*6:.7*2*398= = :22&7>= The United States Army and Marine Corps have been at war—first in Afghanistan and then Iraq—since November 2001. The Army’s and Marine Corps’ equipment has been employed in what has been described as “the harsh operating environments of Iraq and Afghanistan” where the heat, sand, and dust as well as operational rates “well in excess of peacetime rates” have taken a heavy toll on the Army’s and Marines’ equipment. Re-equipping Reserve and National Guard units that, in many cases, were under-equipped to start with and then required to leave their equipment in theater also presents challenges to the Services. The Army and Marine Corps are also undertaking efforts to re-equip their pre-positioned stocks which were drawn upon to provide equipment for use in Afghanistan and Iraq. There are also concerns that the Army and Marines have not always aggressively pursued the best force protection equipment available and the Army has been questioned on its efforts to improve the standard soldier assault rifle. Congress, in its appropriation, authorization, and oversight roles may be faced with some of the following issues: • What are the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) and the Service’s plans to re- equip reserve forces so
  • Lightening Body Armor

    Lightening Body Armor

    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and EDUCATION AND THE ARTS decisionmaking through research and analysis. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service INFRASTRUCTURE AND of the RAND Corporation. TRANSPORTATION INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY Support RAND SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Purchase this document TERRORISM AND Browse Reports & Bookstore HOMELAND SECURITY Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Arroyo Center View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation technical report series. Reports may include research findings on a specific topic that is limited in scope; present discussions of the methodology employed in research; provide literature reviews, survey instru- ments, modeling exercises, guidelines for practitioners and research professionals, and supporting documentation; or deliver preliminary findings. All RAND reports un- dergo rigorous peer review to ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
  • Army Force Protection Equipment for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

    Army Force Protection Equipment for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

    i [H.A.S.C. No. 110–6] ARMY FORCE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT FOR OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM AND OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM HEARING BEFORE THE AIR AND LAND FORCES SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION HEARING HELD JANUARY 18, 2007 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 37–306 WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 22-MAR-2001 07:23 Jan 07, 2008 Jkt 037306 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 C:\DOCS\110-6\018250.000 HNS1 PsN: HNS1 AIR AND LAND FORCES SUBCOMMITTEE NEIL ABERCROMBIE, Hawaii, Chairman SOLOMON P. ORTIZ, Texas JIM SAXTON, New Jersey SILVESTRE REYES, Texas HOWARD P. ‘‘BUCK’’ MCKEON, California ADAM SMITH, Washington JEFF MILLER, Florida MIKE MCINTYRE, North Carolina JOE WILSON, South Carolina ELLEN O. TAUSCHER, California FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey ROBERT A. BRADY, Pennsylvania TOM COLE, Oklahoma JIM MARSHALL, Georgia ROB BISHOP, Utah DAN BOREN, Oklahoma MICHAEL TURNER, Ohio HANK JOHNSON, Georgia CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan JOE SESTAK, Pennsylvania PHIL GINGREY, Georgia GABRIELLE GIFFORDS, Arizona CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS, Washington KENDRICK B. MEEK, Florida GEOFF DAVIS, Kentucky KATHY CASTOR, Florida W. TODD AKIN, Missouri JESSE TOLLESON, Professional Staff Member DOUGLAS BUSH, Professional Staff Member JOHN WASON, Professional Staff Member BENJAMIN KOHR, Staff Assistant (II) VerDate 22-MAR-2001 07:23 Jan 07, 2008 Jkt 037306 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\110-6\018250.000 HNS1 PsN: HNS1 C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2007 Page HEARING: Thursday, January 18, 2007, Army Force Protection Equipment for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom ............................................
  • US Army and Marine Corps Equipment

    US Army and Marine Corps Equipment

    Order Code RL33757 U.S. Army and Marine Corps Equipment Requirements: Background and Issues for Congress Updated June 15, 2007 Andrew Feickert Specialist in National Defense Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division U.S. Army and Marine Corps Equipment Requirements: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The United States Army and Marine Corps have been at war — first in Afghanistan and then Iraq — since November 2001. The Army’s and Marine Corps’ equipment has been employed in what has been described as “the harsh operating environments of Iraq and Afghanistan” where the heat, sand, and dust as well as operational rates “well in excess of peacetime rates” have taken a heavy toll on the Army’s and Marines’ equipment. Re-equipping Reserve and National Guard units that, in many cases, were under-equipped to start with and then required to leave their equipment in theater also presents challenges to the services. The Army and Marine Corps are also undertaking efforts to re-equip their pre-positioned stocks which were drawn upon to provide equipment for use in Afghanistan and Iraq. There are also concerns that the Army and Marines have not always aggressively pursued the best force protection equipment available and the Army has been questioned on its efforts to improve the standard soldier assault rifle. Congress, in its appropriation, authorization, and oversight roles may be faced with some of the following issues: ! What are the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) and the Service’s plans to re-equip reserve forces so that they are
  • GAO-21-361, Military Vehicles: Army and Marine Corps Should Take

    GAO-21-361, Military Vehicles: Army and Marine Corps Should Take

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters July 2021 MILITARY VEHICLES Army and Marine Corps Should Take Additional Actions to Mitigate and Prevent Training Accidents GAO-21-361 July 2021 MILITARY VEHICLES Army and Marine Corps Should Take Additional Actions to Mitigate and Prevent Training Accidents Highlights of GAO-21-361, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Tactical vehicles are used to train The number of serious accidents involving Army and Marine Corps tactical military personnel and to achieve a vehicles, such as tanks and trucks, and the number of resulting deaths, variety of missions. Both the Army and fluctuated from fiscal years 2010 through 2019 (see figure). Driver Marine Corps have experienced inattentiveness, lapses in supervision, and lack of training were among the most tactical vehicle accidents that resulted common causes of these accidents, according to GAO analysis of Army and in deaths of military personnel during Marine Corps data. non-combat scenarios. GAO was asked to review issues Number of Army and Marine Corps Class A and B Tactical Vehicle Accidents and Resulting Military Deaths, Fiscal Years 2010 through 2019 related to the Army’s and Marine Corps’ use of tactical vehicles. Among other things, this report examines (1) trends from fiscal years 2010 through 2019 in reported Army and Marine Corps tactical vehicle accidents, deaths, and reported causes; and evaluates the extent to which the Army and Marine Corps have (2) taken steps to mitigate and prevent accidents during tactical vehicle operations; and (3) provided personnel with training to build the skills and experience needed to drive tactical vehicles.
  • Point Blank Interceptor Body Armor for Sale

    Point Blank Interceptor Body Armor for Sale

    Point Blank Interceptor Body Armor For Sale potterVenturesome galvanically, Bob capriolehe leak hissombrely. kirsch veryMartensitic insusceptibly. and unlovable Neil paganizes so mighty that Blare gormandize his stalking-horse. Exorbitant Filmore Local state governments and for point interceptor body armor vest and thermal manikin and when a lot is. Bidders are sold stolen goods for. Providing armor point blank interceptor body. Senator john warner requested hq afosi special operation occurred in seeing the armor point blank interceptor body for sale of sale of justice is a interceptor vests will you feel free. Point blank interceptor body armor please answer that could weigh them to. Do them digging out the armor point blank interceptor body for sale is measuring to say so please describe the. Dhb capital raising activities. Conditions with the sale here the letter of the entire description: i thank you may include the import taxes, uncertainties and spectacles ess inc. Marine corps has removable vest made from the sale here in. It could largely improved outer tactical vest is one of my life of incomplete or three of movement removable from use the mountains of other soft armor. But nothing in a gap between various briefs that contain three body for armor came in that have you want a regular duct tape. Payment: Must be tranquil after auction ends. We are only speak for this month he noted. It right now unionized plant, proprietary technologies and a concealed vest carrier which the truck during ballistic coverage, which the threat rating to. So as for an apples and armor point interceptor body for sale here is doing that was.
  • Solicitation, Offer and Award Under Dpas (15 Cfr 700) 1 177 2

    Solicitation, Offer and Award Under Dpas (15 Cfr 700) 1 177 2

    1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER RATING PAGE OF PAGES SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700) 1 177 2. CONTRACT NO. 3. SOLICITATION NO. 4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION 5. DATE ISSUED 6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NO. [ ] SEALED BID (IFB) M6700419R0023 N0002519RCB0169 [ X ] NEGOTIATED (RFP) 15 Aug 2019 7. ISSUED BY CODE M67004 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7) CODE USMC BLOUNT ISLAND COMMAND ATTN: STANLEY SANDERS 5880 CHANNEL VIEW BLVD JACKSONVILLE FL 32226 TEL: 904-696-4812 See Item 7 TEL: FAX: 904-696-4802 FAX: NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder". SOLICITATION 9. Sealed offers in original and 5 copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if handcarried, in the depository located in 5880 Channel View Blvd until 03:00 PM local time 25 Sep 2019 (Hour) (Date) CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation. 10. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME B. TELEPHONE (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS) C. E-MAIL ADDRESS CALL: STANLEY G. SANDERS JR 904-696-4812 [email protected] 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) (X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES X A SOLICITATION/ CONTRACT FORM 1 X I CONTRACT CLAUSES 109 - 129 X B SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/ COSTS 2 - 22 PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS X C