DOCSLIB.ORG

The Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement Program-An Analysis of a Multi-Service Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement Program-An Analysis of a Multi-Service Office Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2004-06 The medium tactical vehicle replacement program-an analysis of a multi-service office Schramm, Kenneth Edward Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/1518 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM-AN ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-SERVICE ARMY AND MARINE CORPS PRODUCT OFFICE by Kenneth Edward Schramm June 2004 Thesis Advisor: Brad R. Naegle Second Reader: Michael W. Boudreau Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704- 0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2004 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: The Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Program-An Analysis of a Multi-Service Army and Marine Corps Product Office 6. AUTHOR(S) Kenneth Schramm 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING / N/A MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES: The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) The Marine Corps is fielding the MTVR Truck as a replacement for its aging fleet of five-ton cargo trucks. The MTVR is an Acquisition Category II program that was a multi-service Army-Marine Corps program. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the effectiveness of having an Army Product Office execute a Marine Corps Program. The study analyzes the effectiveness of the timing of the program’s transition from the Army to the Marine Corps. A detailed literature search, as well as information gathered from attending various IPRs and conducting interviews with program officials and contractors, provided the basis for the in-depth background study presented. Analysis of the data gathered led to a justification for multi-service managed programs, as well as to recommendations on the timing of the MTVR program transition. 14. SUBJECT TERMS MTVR Truck, Acquisition Category II, ACAT, Marine Corp’s Medium 15. NUMBER OF Tactical Vehicle Replacement, High Mobility Multi-Purpose Wheeled Vehicle, HMMWV, PAGES Logistics Vehicle System, LVS, Light Armored Vehicle, LAV 262 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THE MEDIUM TACTICAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM-AN ANALYSIS OF A MULTI-SERVICE ARMY AND MARINE CORPS PRODUCT OFFICE Kenneth E. Schramm Program Analyst, United States Army B.B.A., University of Michigan, 1977 MBA, University of Detroit, 1986 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PROGRAM MANAGEMENT from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL June 2004 Author: Kenneth E. Schramm Approved by: Brad R. Naegle Thesis Advisor Michael W. Boudreau Second Reader Douglas A. Brook, Dean Graduate School of Business and Public Policy iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT The Marine Corps is fielding the MTVR Truck as a replacement for its aging fleet of five-ton cargo trucks. The MTVR is an Acquisition Category II program that was a multi-service Army-Marine Corps program. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the effectiveness of having an Army Product Office execute a Marine Corps Program. The study analyzes the effectiveness of the timing of the program’s transition from the Army to the Marine Corps. A detailed literature search, as well as information gathered from attending various IPRs and conducting interviews with program officials and contractors, provided the basis for the in-depth background study presented. Analysis of the data gathered led to a justification for multi-service managed programs, as well as to recommendations on the timing of the MTVR program transition. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................. 1 A. PURPOSE............................................................................................ 1 B. BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 1 C. RESEARCH QUESTIONS ................................................................... 3 1. Primary Research Question.................................................... 3 2. Supplemental Research Questions........................................ 3 D. SCOPE................................................................................................. 3 E. METHODOLOGY................................................................................. 3 F. ORGANIZATION.................................................................................. 4 G. BENEFITS OF RESEARCH................................................................. 4 II. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................. 7 A. HISTORY OF U.S. ARMY PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OF U.S. MARINE CORPS TACTICAL WHEELED VEHICLES......................... 7 1. Logistics Vehicle System (LVS) ............................................. 7 2. Light Armored Vehicle (LAV).................................................. 9 B. ARMY’S FMTV- IMPACT ON THE MTVR ......................................... 10 1. FMTV Program Background ................................................. 10 2. Corrosion Standards ............................................................. 11 C. MEDIUM TACTICAL REPLACEMENT VEHICLE (MTVR) PROGRAM......................................................................................... 12 1. Program Goals....................................................................... 12 2. MTVR Operational and System Description........................ 13 3. Marine Corps Advanced Technology Demonstration and Acquisition Streamlining....................................................... 15 4. Industry Involvement/IPTs .................................................... 17 5. USMC Selection of Army Program Management ................ 19 6. USMC/Army Combined Medium Tactical Truck Remanufacture (MTTR) EMD Prototype Testing and Contract Strategies................................................................ 19 7. LRIP and Production Testing................................................ 21 D. MTVR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT........................ 25 1. Army Product Management Office ....................................... 25 a. PM Tactical Wheeled Vehicle Remanufacture Programs ..................................................................... 25 b. Reassigned to PM Family of Medium Tactical Vehicles (FMTV) .......................................................... 25 c. Reassigned as Direct Reporting Product Manager to PEO Ground Combat and Support Systems (GCSS) ......................................................................... 26 d. Reassigned to PM Ground Support Integration ....... 27 vii e. PM-MTVR Awards and Recognition .......................... 28 2. TACOM Matrix Support Organizations ................................ 29 a. Acquisition Center ...................................................... 29 b. The Integrated Material Management Center (IMMC) .......................................................................... 30 c. Safety Office ................................................................ 30 d. TACOM Security Assistance Center (TSAC) ............ 30 3. USMC Acquisition Organizations......................................... 31 a. MARCORSYSCOM ...................................................... 31 b. USMC Acquisition Center-Quantico, VA ................... 32 4. Future Cooperative Acquisition Efforts............................... 32 E. CHAPTER SUMMARY....................................................................... 34 III. ARMY/MARINE CORPS MULTI-SERVICE TWV ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................ 37 A. MTVR TRANSITION FROM ARMY TO USMC: THE PLAN.............. 37 1. Rationale................................................................................. 37 2. Goals and Challenges ..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Off-Road Autonomous Vehicle for DARPA's Grand Challenge
    2005 Journal of Field Robotics Special Issue on the DARPA Grand Challenge MITRE Meteor: An Off-Road Autonomous Vehicle for DARPA’s Grand Challenge Robert Grabowski, Richard Weatherly, Robert Bolling, David Seidel, Michael Shadid, and Ann Jones. The MITRE Corporation 7525 Colshire Drive McLean VA, 22102 [email protected] Abstract The MITRE Meteor team fielded an autonomous vehicle that competed in DARPA’s 2005 Grand Challenge race. This paper describes the team’s approach to building its robotic vehicle, the vehicle and components that let the vehicle see and act, and the computer software that made the vehicle autonomous. It presents how the team prepared for the race and how their vehicle performed. 1 Introduction In 2004, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) challenged developers of autonomous ground vehicles to build machines that could complete a 132-mile, off-road course. Figure 1: The MITRE Meteor starting the finals of the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge. 2005 Journal of Field Robotics Special Issue on the DARPA Grand Challenge 195 teams applied – only 23 qualified to compete. Qualification included demonstrations to DARPA and a ten-day National Qualifying Event (NQE) in California. The race took place on October 8 and 9, 2005 in the Mojave Desert over a course containing gravel roads, dirt paths, switchbacks, open desert, dry lakebeds, mountain passes, and tunnels. The MITRE Corporation decided to compete in the Grand Challenge in September 2004 by sponsoring the Meteor team. They believed that MITRE’s work programs and military sponsors would benefit from an understanding of the technologies that contribute to the DARPA Grand Challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Corporation
    CHARLES L. SZEWS WILSON R. JONES Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer (through 12/31/15) (effective 01/01/16) LEADING THE MARKET Oshkosh Corporation is a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad range of access equipment, specialty military, fire & emergency and commercial vehicles and vehicle bodies. Oshkosh’s products are valued worldwide by rental companies, defense forces, concrete placement and refuse businesses, fire & emergency departments and municipal and airport services, where high quality, superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are paramount. Oshkosh Corporation partners with customers to deliver superior solutions that safely and efficiently move people and materials at work, around the globe and around the clock. In short, we are Moving the World at Work. Our top priorities are to serve and delight our customers as well as drive superior operating performance to benefit our shareholders. We do this while leveraging our strengths and resources in engineering, manufacturing, purchasing and distribution across our four business segments. Founded in 1917, Oshkosh Corporation has manufacturing operations in eight U.S. states and in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Mexico, Romania and the United Kingdom. The company currently employs approximately 13,000 people worldwide. OSHKOSH CORPORATION 2015 FORM 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 1-31371 Oshkosh Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Wisconsin 39-0520270 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • About This Template
    Oshkosh Corporation Investor Presentation March 2021 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition; the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; actions that may be taken by governmental authorities and others to address or otherwise mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on global economies and the Company’s customers, suppliers and employees; the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets, which are particularly impacted by the strength of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Corporation
    AT-A-GLANCE Oshkosh Corporation is a leading designer, The top priorities of our 13,800 team members manufacturer and marketer of a broad range are to serve and delight our customers as well of access equipment, specialty military, fire & as drive superior operating performance to emergency and commercial vehicles and vehicle benefit our shareholders. We do this through bodies. Our products are valued worldwide by rental execution of our MOVE strategy and by leveraging companies, defense forces, concrete placement our strengths and resources in engineering, and refuse businesses, fire & emergency departments manufacturing, purchasing and distribution and municipal and airport services, where high across our four business segments. quality, superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are paramount. Approximately 24% of our revenues came from outside the United States in fiscal 2016 and we We partner with our customers to deliver superior have manufacturing operations in eight U.S. states solutions that safely and efficiently move people and in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, and materials at work, around the globe and around Mexico, Romania and the United Kingdom as well the clock. as operations to support sales or deliver service in over 150 countries. We believe our business model makes us a different integrated global industrial and supports our Our company was founded in 1917 and we look goals of driving superior value for both customers forward to celebrating our 100th anniversary in and shareholders. Our business model brings 2017. We are proud of our strong culture and together a unique set of integrated capabilities and operating performance that contribute to our diverse end markets to position our company to be positive outlook as we prepare to celebrate 100 successful in a variety of economic environments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Terramax Autonomous Vehicle Concludes the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge
    Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2006, June 13-15, 2006, Tokyo, Japan 13-17 The TerraMax Autonomous Vehicle concludes the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge Deborah Braid Alberto Broggi Gary Schmiedel Rockwell Collins, VisLab, University of Parma, Oshkosh Truck Corp., IA, USA Italy WI, USA [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] This kind of vehicle was chosen for the DARPA Grand Abstract— The TerraMax autonomous vehicle is based on Challenge (DGC) because of its proven off-road mobility, as Oshkosh Truck’s Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement well as for its direct applicability to potential future (MTVR) truck platform and was one of the 5 vehicles able to autonomous missions. successfully reach the finish line of the 132 miles DARPA Grand Two significant vehicle upgrades were carried out since the Challenge desert race. Due to its size and the narrow passages, 2004 DARPA Grand Challenge event namely the addition of TerraMax had to travel slowly, but its capabilities demonstrated rear-wheel steering and a sensor cleaning system. the maturity of the overall system. Rear steer has been added to TerraMax to give it a tighter 29- Rockwell Collins developed the autonomous intelligent Vehicle Management System (iVMS) which includes vehicle sensor foot turning radius. Although this allows the vehicle to management, navigation and control systems; the University of negotiate tighter turns without needing frequent back ups, the Parma provided the vehicle’s vision system, while Oshkosh back up maneuver is required to align the vehicle with narrow Truck Corp. provided project management, system integration, passages. low level controls hardware, modeling and simulation support The cleaning system keeps the lenses of the TerraMax sensors and the vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Defense Overview
    INNOVATION DRIVES FORWARD Oshkosh Defense Overview FEDNOR Road to Defence 27 March 2017 Contact: David L. Jensen, Director, Defense International Offsets/Industrial Participation Oshkosh Defense, LLC Phone: 920-233-9227 E-mail:Company [email protected] Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 1 Oshkosh Corporation Today Established: 1917 FY15 Sales: $6.1 billion Fortune Ranking: 394 Headquarters: Oshkosh, Wisconsin Operations: Our Mission: To partner with customers to Manufacturing in seven countries deliver superior solutions that safely and Service centers in 23 countries efficiently move people and materials at work, around the globe and around the clock Six new product development facilities Employees: 12,000+ Customer Reach: 130 countries NYSE: OSK Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 2 A Family of Industry Leading Brands Pierce Manufacturing (1996) Jerr-Dan Corporation (2004) Nova Quintech (1997) CON-E-CO (2005) McNeilus Companies (1998) London Machinery Inc. (2005) Kewaunee Fabrications (1999) AK Specialty Vehicles (2006) Viking Truck & Equipment (1999) Iowa Mold Tooling (IMT) (2006) TEMCO (2001) JLG Industries (2006) TRANSFORMING OSHKOSH INTO A GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL 3 Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 3 Working Together to Move the World at Work Values, Mission, MOVE Strategy Oshkosh Operating System Company Confidential Oshkosh Defense, LLC Proprietary and Competition Sensitive 4 Oshkosh Corporation
    [Show full text]
  • Just Another Truck?
    JUST ANOTHER TRUCK? A Monograph by Major Daniel V. Sulka Transportation Corps School of Advanced Military Studies United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, Kansas Fit Term AY 91-92 SWOL OF ADVANCED MILITARY STUDIES MONCGRAPH APPROVAL Student: Major Daniel V. Sulka. US Army Title of Monograph: The Palletized Load System.... Just Another Truck? Approve by: Monograph Director Director, School of es R. McDonough, Advanced Military Studies Director, Graduate Philip J. Brookes, PHD Degree Program Accepted this &fP day of -&Zfdk-, 1991 ABSTRACT THE PALLETIZED LOAD SYSTEM.. .. JUST ANOTHER TRUCK? by Major Daniel V. Sulka, USA, 61 pages. This monograph examines the Palletized Load System to determine if it will effectively support the transportation requirements of current and evolving doctrine. The PLS, a self loading and unloading truck and trailer system, will be fielded in the near future. This technology represents a significant investment in addressing shortfalls in ammuni- tion distribution under the Maneuver Oriented Ammunition Distribution System (MOADS). To assess the impact of the Palletized Load System on logisticians' ability to support AirLand Battle doctrine and and the evolving AirLand Operations doctrine, the monograph first traces historical and theoretical influences on the system. These include the evolution of truck technology, the impact of mechanized transport and mobility on doctrine, and the development of unit load devices and containerization. The monograph briefly addresses current transportation chal- lenges, the design of the Palletized Load System, and its planned use. The monograph concludes that the Palletized Load Sys- tem is a natural confluence of the evolution of transporta- tion technologies and the demands of highly mobile forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Support and Combat Service Support
    COMBAT SUPPORT AND COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT Under the Program Executive Office for Combat Support & Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS), project man- agers, together with their reporting prod- uct managers and product directors, are responsible for Army systems and some joint service programs across all phases of their life cycle. Program phases fall into the areas of: pre-systems acquisition (concept refine- ment or technology development), gener- ally consisting of research and develop- 350 ARMY I October 2010 ment programs and prior to a Milestone B; systems acquisition (between Milestone B and full materiel release); systems after full materiel release (in production and fielding phases); and two types of sustain- ment (operations and support): systems Logistics support that have completed fielding, are no longer vessel (LSV) in production and are managed directly by the project manager and systems that have completed fielding, are no longer in pro- duction and are managed by an Army Ma- teriel Command commodity command, but for which the PM is the life-cycle man- ager. PEO CS&CSS Project Managers include: Project Manager Force Projection, Project Manager Joint Combat Support Systems, Project Manager Tactical Vehicles and Pro- ject Manager Mine Resistant Ambush Pro- tected Vehicles. A representative sampling Army,” the Product Director for Army combat vehicles and sustainment cargo. of their programs follows. Watercraft Systems (PD AWS) is working The 313-foot LSV class vessel, designed to to provide “a flexible and responsive fleet, carry more than 2,000 tons of deck cargo, Project Manager Force Projection projecting and sustaining America’s forces has a beam of 60 feet and a molded depth The Project Manager Force Projection through the 21st century.” PD AWS is re- of 19 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of the Palletized Load System
    OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL" ACQUISITION OF THE PALLETIZED LOAD SYSTEM Report Number 92-003 October 9, 1991 Department of Defense INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 October 9, 1991 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT) SUBJECT: Audit Report on the Acquisition of the Palletized Load System (Report No. 92-003) We are providing this final report for your information and use. Comments on a draft of this report were considered in preparing the final report. We performed the audit from September 1989 through January 1991 as part of our continuing review of major acquisition programs. The Army had not accurately quantified the acquisition requirements for the PLS program and had not determined the cost­ effectiveness of all planned uses of the PLS. As a result, the acquisition requirements for the PLS were misstated by about $653.8 million. Also, the Army could unnecessarily spend at least $279.8 million by using the PLS to support Multiple Launch Rocket System units. DoD Directive 7650.3 requires that all audit recommendations be resolved promptly. Therefore, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management) must provide final comments on the unresolved recommendations by December 9, 1991. The courtesies extended to the audit staff are appreciated. If you have any questions on this audit, please contact Mr. Rayburn H. Stricklin at (703) 614-3965 (DSN 224-3965) or Mr. Verne F. Petz at (703) 693-0388 (DSN 223-0388). Copies of this report are being provided to the activities listed in Appendix H.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-Art Remote Sensing Geospatial Technologies In
    STATE-OF-THE-ART REMOTE SENSING GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES IN SUPPORT OF TRANSPORTATION MONITORING AND MANAGEMENT DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Eva Petra Paska, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. Dorota Grejner-Brzezinska, Adviser Dr. Mark McCord ____________________________________ Dr. Alper Yilmaz Adviser Dr. Charles K. Toth, Co-Adviser Geodetic Science and Surveying Graduate Program ABSTRACT The widespread use of digital technologies, combined with rapid sensor advancements resulted in a paradigm shift in geospatial technologies the end of the last millennium. The improved performance provided by the state-of-the-art airborne remote sensing technology created opportunities for new applications that require high spatial and temporal resolution data. Transportation activities represent a major segment of the economy in industrialized nations. As such both the transportation infrastructure and traffic must be carefully monitored and planned. Engineering scale topographic mapping has been a long-time geospatial data user, but the high resolution geospatial data could also be considered for vehicle extraction and velocity estimation to support traffic flow analysis. The objective of this dissertation is to provide an assessment on what state-of-the- art remote sensing technologies can offer in both areas: first, to further improve the accuracy and reliability of topographic, in particular, roadway corridor mapping systems, and second, to assess the feasibility of extracting primary data to support traffic flow computation. The discussion is concerned with airborne LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) and digital camera systems, supported by direct georeferencing.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Awards $6.7 Billion Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Contract to Oshkosh Corporation
    NEWS RELEASE U.S. Army Awards $6.7 Billion Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Contract to Oshkosh Corporation 8/25/2015 Oshkosh’s JLTV is the Next Generation Light Vehicle Designed to Move and Protect Our Troops in Future Missions OSHKOSH, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- The U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments Command (TACOM) Life Cycle Management Command (LCMC) has awarded Oshkosh Defense, LLC, an Oshkosh Corporation (NYSE: OSK) company, a $6.7 billion firm fixed price production contract to manufacture the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV). The JLTV program fills a critical capability gap for the U.S. Army and Marine Corps by replacing a large portion of the legacy HMMWV fleet with a light tactical vehicle with far superior protection and off-road mobility. During the contract, which includes both Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) and Full Rate Production (FRP), Oshkosh expects to deliver approximately 17,000 vehicles and sustainment services. “Following a rigorous, disciplined JLTV competition, the U.S. Army and Marine Corps are giving our nation’s Warfighters the world’s most capable light vehicle – the Oshkosh JLTV,” said Charles L. Szews, Oshkosh Corporation chief executive officer. “Oshkosh is honored to be selected for the JLTV production contract, which builds upon our 90-year history of producing tactical wheeled vehicles for U.S. military operations at home and abroad. We are fully prepared to build a fleet of exceptional JLTVs to serve our troops in future missions.” The JLTV program provides protected, sustained and networked light tactical mobility for American troops across the full spectrum of military operations and missions anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-06-160 Defense Logistics: Several Factors Limited The
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees March 2006 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Several Factors Limited the Production and Installation of Army Truck Armor during Current Wartime Operations a GAO-06-160 March 2006 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Several Factors Limited the Production Highlights of GAO-06-160, a report to and Installation of Army Truck Armor congressional committees during Current Wartime Operations Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In April 2005, GAO reported on The Army expects to have met its current requirements for the production factors affecting the timely and installation of truck armor by the end of January 2006 except for fuel production of up-armored high- tankers. Completion of armor kit installation for tankers is expected by mobility multi-purpose wheeled January 2007. Although the Army first identified a requirement for 3,780 vehicles (HMMWV) and add-on truck armor kits for five types of trucks in November 2003, it did not armor kits for HMMWVs, as well as other items critically needed by produce all of the kits until February 2005 and did not install the kits to fully deployed forces during Operation meet the requirement until May 2005 – 18 months after the initial Iraqi Freedom. Due to high interest requirement was identified. However, by that time, requirements had by Congress and the public increased substantially. As subsequent requirements for an additional 7,847 regarding vehicle armor, GAO kits, excluding tankers, were identified, the time lag to meet them lessened. initiated this subsequent engagement to examine issues Time to Meet Initial Truck Armor Requirements by Truck Type affecting the production and Date required Date required Total months to installation of armor for medium Initial November quantities quantities fully meet initial and heavy trucks.
    [Show full text]