Cology Traditionally Strong Position in Sweden Hot Topics Session

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

ecnp matters NEWSLETTER NO. 7, June 2004 Stockholm is the location of the next ECNP Congress. From October 9 - 13, 2004 improvement. The presentation of the scientists in the field of neuropsychopharmacology will be attending some of the hyperbolic function by Lars Farde, i.e. 28 symposia, educational meetings and more. Although these will take place the relationship between dose/concen- between the walls of the congress centre, ecnp matters would like to give you a tration and receptor occupancy has had view of neuropsychopharmacology in Sweden. a substantial impact on clinical psy- chopharmacology. It can be questioned if not the main advantages of atypicals in comparison with the classical neu- Neuropsychopharma- roleptics are dose related. cology traditionally Increasing gap Jan Milders In the past decade molecular genetics strong position in has been successfully applied in phar- macology. However, psychopharmacol- cological research has been hampered Sweden ogy is also dependent on understanding by decreased resources during the past complex interactions among different decade. Psychiatrists have very little Frits-Axel Wiesel, Uppsala University Hospital transmission systems and effects on time for research, which is largely due behaviour in developing and evaluating to cuts in the health care budget Among Swedish psychiatrists the interest in neuropsychopharmacology animal models in human psychophar- together with decreasing grants. was evident even before the introduction of the neuroleptics and antide- macology. One outstanding researcher Furthermore, there is an increasing gap pressants in the 1950s. Psychopharmacology at that time was of greater in this respect is Torgny Svensson who, between clinical and basic research. interest to Swedish psychiatrists than psychoanalytical theories. There was among other things, has demonstrated Although there are several young scien- a close connection between basic and clinical research and therefore new that not only the firing but also the pat- tists in neurobiology and pharmacol- ideas were easily transmitted to clinical psychiatry. terns are of importance in the commu- ogy, most of them are not medical stu- nication among neurons. Arvid Carlsson dents. During the successful years in he basic neuropsychopharmacologi- The discovery of the endorphins by also represents this research tradition, psychopharmacology research, several Tcal research in Sweden started with Lars Terenius has had an impact on the which is behind the development of the clinical researchers were trained in Ulf von Euler who discovered nora- view of addiction as a brain disease. third generation of antipsychotics, i.e. basic science before becoming clinical drenaline and defining it as a transmit- Jörgen Engel has worked with behav- the dopamine stabilizers. researchers. The importance of this ter in the sympathetic nervous system. iour and central neurotransmission and The basis for successful psychopharma- change is unclear, however. Later Arvid Carlsson demonstrated that how pharmacology could intervene in dopamine was not just an intermediate the mechanisms underlying addiction. in noradrenaline synthesis but an inde- Closer to the brain pendent transmitter in the brain. These Clinical pharmacology was developed Hot Topics Session two Nobel laureates have meant a great during the 1960s and 1970s. Folke deal for the interest in and development Sjöquist had a major role in this devel- The presenters of the sixteen best posters of the 2004 ECNP Workshop for young scien- The 17 th ECNP Congress is organ- of neuropsychopharmacology in opment. There was a hope to find rela- tists have been selected to present the two Hot Topics Sessions at the Stockholm ised under the patronage of Her Sweden. Arvid Carlsson is still very tionships between clinical effects and Congress. Majesty Queen Silvia from Sweden. influential in both basic and clinical sci- drug concentrations in the blood. ence. Another person of great impor- Although research interest in pharmaco- The sessions are: tance was Nils-Åke Hillarp who collab- kinetics was intense, results were rather S.04 Hot topics in preclinical neuropsychopharmacology orated with Arvid Carlsson. It was meagre. Correlations with side effects Sunday October 10, 2004 (09.00 – 11.05 hours) Hillarp who developed the technique to were found but for the therapeutic • Diverse psychotomimetics act through a common signalling pathway visualise the monoamine neurons. This effects only ranges of plasma concen- Per Svenningsson, Sweden technique attracted several young trations could be defined. The determi- • Neurobiological and behavioural effects of chronic mild stress in glucocorticoid researchers to his laboratory at the nation of drug concentrations is helpful receptor-impaired transgenic mice Karolinska Institute. Kjell Fuxe and to individualise drug treatment and con- Nicolas Froger, France Annica Dahlström mapped the trol for adherence. One has analysed • Leptin treatment in activity-based anorexia monoamine neurons in the rat brain drug concentrations in CSF to come Jaquelien Hillebrand, the Netherlands and Urban Ungerstedt mapped in detail closer to the brain, though that has not • Temporal and anatomical characterization of stress-related changes on the dopamine neurons. Another break- improved the value of drug analysis in BDNF expression in the rat central nervous system through was Thomas Hökfelt’s discov- understanding clinical effects in the Raffaella Molteni, Italy ery that a neuron operated with more patients. Obviously one has to come • Changes in subunit composition of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in animal than one transmitter (i.e. different kinds closer to the brain. model of schizophrenia: effect of subunit selective antagonist of neuropeptides). During the 1970s the first positron cam- Iryna Skuba, Czech Republic era was built in the USA. Lars Ericsson • Prefrontal cortex dysfunction in an animal model for neurodevelopmental psy- Still present took part in this development and, chopathological disorders The find by Arvid Carlsson that anti- when he returned to Sweden he built a Leontien Diergaarde, the Netherlands psychotics blocked catecholamine/ camera in Stockholm. The introduction • Neuroimaging changes in an animal model of schizophrenia dopamine receptors and that antidepres- of positron emission tomography (PET) Céline Risterucci, Switzerland sant inhibited reuptake of serotonin and in clinical research was the accomplish- • Hypothalamic histochemistry in different genetic models of anorexia noradrenaline was fundamental in psy- ment of David Ingvar. In the first stud- Serguei Fetissov, Sweden chopharmacology. In fact the hypothe- ies patients with schizophrenia were Page 2 ses formulated at that time are still pres- investigated with 11C-glucose as the S.07 Hot topics in interface neuropsychopharmacology Educational Team Bulgaria ent today. During the 1960s new analyt- tracer. However, it was soon clear that Sunday, October 10, 2004 (14.00 – 16.05 hours) ical methods were introduced into phar- the glucose technique was not very use- • Anxiogenic drugs act selectively on topgraphically distinct midbrain, pontine, Page 3 macology, including masspectrometry, a ful in psychopharmacological research. and medullary serotonergic neurones Jan K. Buitelaar: “Children are development led by Bo Holmstedt Pharmacological principals to deter- Jolane Abrams, United Kingdom not simply small adults!” whose main interest was in toxicology mine receptor numbers, binding and • Identification of GABAA receptor subtypes involved in tolerance against the and the cholinergic system. Göran affinity could be used in vivo with PET sedative action of diazepam Sedvall together with Frits-Axel Wiesel as shown by Lars Farde, Göran Sedvall Carolien van Rijnsoever, Switzerland Page 5 and Leif Bertilsson together with Marie and Frits-Axel Wiesel. In the first phar- • GABAB receptors play a key role in the modulation of anxiety and antidepres- The history of HCNP Åsberg developed massfragmento- macological studies of patients with sant-related behaviour: genetic and pharmacological evidence graphic methods to analyse monoamine schizophrenia it was demonstrated that Cedric Mombereau, Switzerland metabolites in body tissues. By analysis D2-dopamine receptors were occupied • Association between serotonin-related genetic polymorphisms and cholecys- of monoamine metabolites in CSF from by different kinds of neuroleptic drugs. tokinin tetrapeptide induced panic attacks in healthy volunteers patients, it was shown that different The clinical relevance of the PET tech- Eduard Maron, Estonia types of neuroleptics increased nique in dosage was obvious. One of • Rivastigmine therapy for memory deficits in patients with schizophrenia dopamine turnover as postulated by the first patients investigated with PET receiving electroconvulsive treatment Arvid Carlssson. Moreover Marie Åsberg, was severely agitated; thus the ward Dana Ophir, Israel in collaboration with Lil Träskman- staff wanted to increase her dose from • Brain volume changes in patients with schizophrenia: a 5-year longitudinal Bendz found that patients who commit- 4mg Haloperidol to the double level. MRI study across the age range ted suicide had lower levels of the sero- However, the patient accepted to be Neeltje van Haren, the Netherlands tonin metabolite 5-HIAA in CSF. investigated with PET and we found • Stimulation of α1-adrenergic and AMPA receptors in rat medial prefrontal Research in addiction has also been that
Recommended publications
  • English Summary

    English Summary

    English summary The Nobel Prize Career of Ragnar Granit. A Study of the Prizes of Science and the Science of the Prizes This study is concerned with two closely related themes: the reward system of science – i .e . the various means by which scientists express their admiration and esteem for their colleagues – and the role played by social networks within this broader framework . The study approa- ches its topic from the viewpoint of the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine, often referred to as the Nobel Prize in Medicine . The focus of the study is on the lengthy process that led to the granting of the 1967 Nobel Prize to Ragnar Granit (1901–1991) for his discoveries concer- ning the primary physiological visual processes in the eye . His award was preceded by one of the most dramatic conflicts within the prize authorities during the post-war decades, and serves here to illustrate the dynamics and the various strategies employed in the Nobel Com- mittee of the Karolinska Institute . In addition, Granit’s career as a No- bel Prize candidate is used as a window through which it is possible to examine the various ways in which elite networks in the scientific field operate . In order to enable comparison, the Nobel careers of Charles Best, Hugo Theorell, and John Eccles are also discussed . On a more ge- neral level the Nobel careers of other scientists who received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in the period 1940–1960 are also dis- cussed, whereby, as an offshoot of the study, a general picture of the Nobel institution in the post-war decades emerges .
  • U. S. Von Euler (1905-1983) Uif S. Von Euler's Contributions to Science

    U. S. Von Euler (1905-1983) Uif S. Von Euler's Contributions to Science

    296 fermentation of sugar. His mother, Astrld Cleve, daughter of the notable chemist P. T. Cleve, was a scientist in her own right, known for her studic~ tff f~ssil Diatomaceae. His godththeT was Svantc U. S. von Euler Arrhenius. Speaking of the scientific atmosphere at (1905-1983) his home and the regular opportunities for meeting scientists, von Euler stated that this Ulf von Euler, who was Professor of and testing substances from body fluids and "no doubt had a great part in my growing Physiology at the Karolinska Institute from tissues was sustained throughout his life. interest in research'. To his own work his 1939 to 1972, died in March this year at the The work suited his gifts - with their basic attitude was objective and he readily ack- age of 78 years. After his major discovery elements of technical skill, great care,' nowledged the contributions to his own in 1946 that consisted of the isolation and perseverance and industry - beyond ordi- field of interest by forerunners and content- identification of noradrenaline in sympathe- nary measures. He was richly rewarded poraries. His matter-of-fact attitude and tic ganglia and nerve fibres, he achieved an (see Bengt Pemow's contribution to this courteous manner contained elements of international reputation as a pioneer in issue of TINS). guarded prudence, producing a barrier catecholamine physiology. Von Euler's life seemed from the begin- which had to be penetrated by those who In 1921 Otto Loewi had found adrenaline ning to be destined for a scientific career. were his co-workers or just his friends.
  • Curt Von Euler 528

    Curt Von Euler 528

    EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Albert J. Aguayo Bernice Grafstein Theodore Melnechuk Dale Purves Gordon M. Shepherd Larry W. Swanson (Chairperson) The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography VOLUME 1 Edited by Larry R. Squire SOCIETY FOR NEUROSCIENCE 1996 Washington, D.C. Society for Neuroscience 1121 14th Street, NW., Suite 1010 Washington, D.C. 20005 © 1996 by the Society for Neuroscience. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 96-70950 ISBN 0-916110-51-6 Contents Denise Albe-Fessard 2 Julius Axelrod 50 Peter O. Bishop 80 Theodore H. Bullock 110 Irving T. Diamond 158 Robert Galambos 178 Viktor Hamburger 222 Sir Alan L. Hodgkin 252 David H. Hubel 294 Herbert H. Jasper 318 Sir Bernard Katz 348 Seymour S. Kety 382 Benjamin Libet 414 Louis Sokoloff 454 James M. Sprague 498 Curt von Euler 528 John Z. Young 554 Curt von Euler BORN: Stockholm County, Sweden October 22, 1918 EDUCATION: Karolinska Institute, B.M., 1940 Karolinska Institute, M.D., 1945 Karolinska Institute, Ph.D., 1947 APPOINTMENTS: Karolinska Institute (1948) Professor Emeritus, Karolinska Institute (1985) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Norwegian Academy of Sciences (foreign member) Curt von Euler conducted pioneering work on the central control of motor systems, brain mechanisms of thermoregulation, and on neural systems that control respiration. Curt von Euler Background ow did I come to devote my life to neurophysiology rather than to a clinical discipline? Why, in the first place, did I choose to study H medicine rather than another branch of biology or other subjects within the natural sciences? And what guided me to make the turns on the road and follow what appeared to be bypaths? There are no simple answers to such questions, but certainly a number of accidental circum- stances have intervened in important ways.
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article

    How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article

    Revista de la Facultad de Medicina ISSN: 2357-3848 ISSN: 0120-0011 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Barco-Ríos, John; Duque-Parra, Jorge Eduardo; Barco-Cano, Johanna Alexandra From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, vol. 66, no. 4, 2018, October-December, pp. 623-627 Universidad Nacional de Colombia DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=576364271017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Rev. Fac. Med. 2018 Vol. 66 No. 4: 623-7 623 REFLECTION PAPER DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) De la fermentación de sustancias al potencial de acción en la ciencia moderna (segunda parte) Received: 08/06/2017. Accepted: 12/12/2017. John Barco-Ríos1,2 • Jorge Eduardo Duque-Parra1,2 • Johanna Alexandra Barco-Cano2,3 1 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Department of Basic Sciences - Manizales - Colombia. 2 Universidad de Caldas - Department of Basic Sciences - Caldas Neuroscience Group - Manizales - Colombia. 3 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Clinical Department - Manizales - Colombia. Corresponding author: John Barco-Ríos. Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Caldas. Calle 65 No. 26-10, office: M203. Telephone number: +57 6 8781500. Manizales. Colombia. Email: [email protected].
  • Load the Brochure About Karolinska

    Load the Brochure About Karolinska

    KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET A medical university Karolinska Institutet – A medical university 1 The Biomedicum research block at Campus Solna, Karolinska Institutet. Photo: Erik Flyg. Cover photo: Students in front of Aula Medica, Campus Solna. Photo: Ulrich Schulte. 2 Karolinska Institutet – A medical university OUR VISION We are advancing knowledge about life and strive towards better health for all. Karolinska Institutet – A medical university 3 A word from the President Welcome to Karolinska Institutet The global pandemic has profoundly During normal times, being a student changed our world. For Karolinska or researcher at KI is challenging, Institutet and society as a whole, it enriching, and fun. With our shared has been a transformative time that experience from this global pande- has provided us with unique insights mic, we have also seen how student into what a medical university can and research life can dramatically truly achieve. Throughout the pan- change. Now we must look forward. demic, our students, faculty, and staff I am convinced that with under- have shown what makes Karolinska graduate and postgraduate education, Institutet one of the world’s leading and world-class research, we will medical universities. We have been contribute to better and more equi- challenged to continuously assess table health regionally, nationally, and adapt to evolving circumstances and globally. Together we will face while ensuring the continuation of the future – we invite you to join us. our core activities and developing in new and unexpected ways. As president, I am both humbled and deeply impressed by how our engaged students, dedicated teach- ers, and eminent researchers have Ole Petter Ottersen exemplified our university’s national President, Karolinska Institutet and international impact – and our contributions to advancing knowled- ge about life and better health for all.
  • Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine

    All Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine 1901 Emil A. von Behring Germany ”for his work on serum therapy, especially its application against diphtheria, by which he has opened a new road in the domain of medical science and thereby placed in the hands of the physician a victorious weapon against illness and deaths” 1902 Sir Ronald Ross Great Britain ”for his work on malaria, by which he has shown how it enters the organism and thereby has laid the foundation for successful research on this disease and methods of combating it” 1903 Niels R. Finsen Denmark ”in recognition of his contribution to the treatment of diseases, especially lupus vulgaris, with concentrated light radiation, whereby he has opened a new avenue for medical science” 1904 Ivan P. Pavlov Russia ”in recognition of his work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged” 1905 Robert Koch Germany ”for his investigations and discoveries in relation to tuberculosis” 1906 Camillo Golgi Italy "in recognition of their work on the structure of the nervous system" Santiago Ramon y Cajal Spain 1907 Charles L. A. Laveran France "in recognition of his work on the role played by protozoa in causing diseases" 1908 Paul Ehrlich Germany "in recognition of their work on immunity" Elie Metchniko France 1909 Emil Theodor Kocher Switzerland "for his work on the physiology, pathology and surgery of the thyroid gland" 1910 Albrecht Kossel Germany "in recognition of the contributions to our knowledge of cell chemistry made through his work on proteins, including the nucleic substances" 1911 Allvar Gullstrand Sweden "for his work on the dioptrics of the eye" 1912 Alexis Carrel France "in recognition of his work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs" 1913 Charles R.
  • The Neuro Nobels

    The Neuro Nobels

    NEURO NOBELS Richard J. Barohn, MD Gertrude and Dewey Ziegler Professor of Neurology University Distinguished Professor Vice Chancellor for Research President Research Institute Research & Discovery Director, Frontiers: The University of Kansas Clinical and Translational Science Grand Rounds Institute February 14, 2018 1 Alfred Nobel 1833-1896 • Born Stockholm, Sweden • Father involved in machine tools and explosives • Family moved to St. Petersburg when Alfred was young • Father worked on armaments for Russians in the Crimean War… successful business/ naval mines (Also steam engines and eventually oil).. made and lost fortunes • Alfred and brothers educated by private teachers; never attended university or got a degree • Sent to Sweden, Germany, France and USA to study chemical engineering • In Paris met the inventor of nitroglycerin Ascanio Sobrero • 1863- Moved back to Stockholm and worked on nitro but too dangerous.. brother killed in an explosion • To make it safer to use he experimented with different additives and mixed nitro with kieselguhr, turning liquid into paste which could be shaped into rods that could be inserted into drilling holes • 1867- Patented this under name of DYNAMITE • Also invented the blasting cap detonator • These inventions and advances in drilling changed construction • 1875-Invented gelignite, more stable than dynamite and in 1887, ballistics, predecessor of cordite • Overall had over 350 patents 2 Alfred Nobel 1833-1896 The Merchant of Death • Traveled much of his business life, companies throughout Europe and America • Called " Europe's Richest Vagabond" • Solitary man / depressive / never married but had several love relationships • No children • This prompted him to rethink how he would be • Wrote poetry in English, was considered remembered scandalous/blasphemous.
  • Fifty Years of Neuropsychopharmacology

    Fifty Years of Neuropsychopharmacology

    Z. Lacković Fifty years of neuropsychopharmacology FIFTY YEARS OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY Zdravko Lacković Laboratory of Molecular Neuropsihopharmacology, Department of Pharmacology & Croatian Brain Research Institute, University of Zagreb School of Medicine In the fi fty years since the fi rst Pula congress a lot of methodology of reverse pharmacology – instead has changed in neuropsychopharmacology. Granted, of a classic approach, nowadays receptors are more the major groups of psychoactive drugs had already and more often synthesized from the human genome been discovered: neuroleptics, antidepressants, ben- followed by search for their endogenous ligands and zodiazepine anxiolitics, psychostimulants... Neu- possibilities of their pharmacological manipulation. rology was using the basic antiepileptics while, for Th rough this, we now have orexines (hypocretins) example, the treatments for vascular and immuno- as key neurotransmitters of wakefulness. By reverse logical diseases were more expectative. At the time pharmacology we have discovered such receptors as of the fi rst Pula congress in 1960 we had only just the new opioid receptor ORL1 and its endogenous discovered that myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune ligand, nociceptin and fi nally, after several decades disease. It is also the year when dopamine defi ciency of diff erent assumptions, the prolactin-stimulating in the brain of Parkinsonian patients was discovered, a factor. What is especially intriguing and motivating fi nding which was to revolutionize understanding and is the fact that there are still hundreds of G-protein treatment of this disease. Th e last fi fty years have also receptors, nuclear receptors and synaptic receptors seen a proliferation of approaches to therapy and the waiting for researchers to discover their function and success of these medical fi elds has grown considerably.
  • Karolinska Institutet – a Medical University

    Karolinska Institutet – a Medical University

    Karolinska Institutet – a medical university Phone: +46-8-524 800 00 ki.se Our mission is to contribute to the improvement of human health through research and education Blood cell. Photo by Lennart Nilsson/Scanpix© Karolinska Institutet is a world-leading medical university and occupies a central position in Swedish public life. The research and education we conduct span the entire medical field, from cell to society. Karolinska Institutet has contributed to the improvement of human health for the past 200 years, and a great deal is expected of us – by our present and future students, by the scientific community, by the healthcare and industrial sectors, by regional and national government, and, not least, by the general public. I remain, however, convinced that we can meet these high expectations. Karolinska Institutet is a strong and expanding university in the midst of rapid change, and is right now seeing major advances in the treatment of our most serious and prevalent chronic diseases, something that will help to improve the lives of many people and make their futures brighter. Anders Hamsten Vice-Chancellor Blood cell. Photo by Lennart Nilsson/Scanpix© A MEDICAL UNIVERSITY Karolinska Institutet is the only university in Sweden to specialize in medicine Karolinska Institutet was founded by King Karl XIII in 1810 as an “academy to the training of skilled army surgeons”. Today, Karolinska Institutet is a modern medical university and one of the foremost in the world. With its close relationship to the clinical milieu, a well established infrastructure and a stable financial situation, Karolinska Institutet has excellent prerequisites for sustaining high quality research and education.
  • List of Nobel Laureates 1

    List of Nobel Laureates 1

    List of Nobel laureates 1 List of Nobel laureates The Nobel Prizes (Swedish: Nobelpriset, Norwegian: Nobelprisen) are awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, the Swedish Academy, the Karolinska Institute, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee to individuals and organizations who make outstanding contributions in the fields of chemistry, physics, literature, peace, and physiology or medicine.[1] They were established by the 1895 will of Alfred Nobel, which dictates that the awards should be administered by the Nobel Foundation. Another prize, the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, was established in 1968 by the Sveriges Riksbank, the central bank of Sweden, for contributors to the field of economics.[2] Each prize is awarded by a separate committee; the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences awards the Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, and Economics, the Karolinska Institute awards the Prize in Physiology or Medicine, and the Norwegian Nobel Committee awards the Prize in Peace.[3] Each recipient receives a medal, a diploma and a monetary award that has varied throughout the years.[2] In 1901, the recipients of the first Nobel Prizes were given 150,782 SEK, which is equal to 7,731,004 SEK in December 2007. In 2008, the winners were awarded a prize amount of 10,000,000 SEK.[4] The awards are presented in Stockholm in an annual ceremony on December 10, the anniversary of Nobel's death.[5] As of 2011, 826 individuals and 20 organizations have been awarded a Nobel Prize, including 69 winners of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.[6] Four Nobel laureates were not permitted by their governments to accept the Nobel Prize.
  • Printwhatyoulike on ノーベル生理学・医学賞

    Printwhatyoulike on ノーベル生理学・医学賞

    ノーベル生理学・医学賞 出典: フリー百科事典『ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ノーベル賞 > ノーベル生理学・医学賞 ノーベル生理学・医学賞(ノーベルせいりがく・いがくしょう)はノーベル賞6部門のうちの1つ。「(動物)生理学及び医学の分野で 最も重要な発見を行なった」人に与えられる。選考はカロリンスカ研究所のノーベル賞委員会が行う。 歴代受賞者 [編集] 年度 受賞者名 国籍 受賞理由 エミール・アドルフ・フォン・ 血清療法の研究、特にジフテリアに対するものによって、 1901 ベーリング ドイツ帝国 医学の新しい分野を切り開き、生理学者の手に疾病や死 年 Emil Adolf von Behring に勝利しうる手段を提供したこと 1902 ロナルド・ロス マラリアの研究によってその感染経路を示し、疾病やそれ イギリス 年 Ronald Ross に対抗する手段に関する研究の基礎を築いたこと 1903 ニールス・フィンセン 疾病の治療法への寄与、特に尋常性狼瘡への光線治療法 デンマーク 年 Niels Ryberg Finsen によって、医学の新しい領域を開拓したこと 1904 イワン・パブロフ 消化生理の研究により、その性質に関する知見を転換し ロシア連邦 年 Ivan Petrovich Pavlov 拡張したこと 1905 ロベルト・コッホ ドイツ帝国 結核に関する研究と発見 年 Robert Koch カミッロ・ゴルジ イタリア王国 Camillo Golgi 1906 神経系の構造研究 年 サンティアゴ・ラモン・イ・カ ハール スペイン Santiago Ramon y Cajal シャルル・ルイ・アルフォンス・ 1907 ラヴラン フランス 疾病発生における原虫類の役割に関する研究 年 Charles Louis Alphonse Laveran パウル・エールリヒ ドイツ帝国 1908 Paul Ehrlich 免疫の研究 年 イリヤ・メチニコフ ロシア連邦 Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1909 エーミール・コッハー スイス 甲状腺の生理学、病理学および外科学的研究 年 Emil Theodor Kocher 1910 アルブレヒト・コッセル 核酸物質を含む、タンパク質に関する研究による細胞化学 ドイツ帝国 年 Albrecht Kossel の知見への寄与 1911 アルヴァル・グルストランド スウェーデン 眼の屈折機能に関する研究 年 Allvar Gullstrand 1912 アレクシス・カレル フランス 血管縫合および臓器の移植に関する研究 年 Alexis Carrel 1913 シャルル・ロベール・リシェ フランス アナフィラキシーの研究 年 Charles Robert Richet 1914 ローベルト・バーラーニ オーストリア=ハンガリー 内耳系の生理学および病理学に関する研究 年 Robert Bárány 帝国 1915 受賞者なし 年 1916 受賞者なし 年 1917 受賞者なし 年 1918 受賞者なし 年 1919 ジュール・ボルデ ベルギー 免疫に関する諸発見 年 Jules Bordet アウグスト・クローグ 1920 Schack August Steenberg デンマーク 毛細血管運動に関する調整機構の発見 年 Krogh 1921 受賞者なし 年 アーチボルド・ヒル イギリス 筋肉中の熱生成に関する発見 1922 Archibald Vivian Hill 年 オットー・マイヤーホフ ドイツ 筋肉における乳酸生成と酸素消費の固定的関連の発見 Otto Fritz Meyerhof
  • Image-Brochure-LNLM-2020-LQ.Pdf

    Image-Brochure-LNLM-2020-LQ.Pdf

    NOBEL LAUREATES PARTICIPATING IN LINDAU EVENTS SINCE 1951 Peter Agre | George A. Akerlof | Kurt Alder | Zhores I. Alferov | Hannes Alfvén | Sidney Altman | Hiroshi Amano | Philip W. Anderson | Christian B. Anfinsen | Edward V. Appleton | Werner Arber | Frances H. Arnold | Robert J. Aumann | Julius Axelrod | Abhijit Banerjee | John Bardeen | Barry C. Barish | Françoise Barré-Sinoussi | Derek H. R. Barton | Nicolay G. Basov | George W. Beadle | J. Georg Bednorz | Georg von Békésy |Eric Betzig | Bruce A. Beutler | Gerd Binnig | J. Michael Bishop | James W. Black | Elizabeth H. Blackburn | Patrick M. S. Blackett | Günter Blobel | Konrad Bloch | Felix Bloch | Nicolaas Bloembergen | Baruch S. Blumberg | Niels Bohr | Max Born | Paul Boyer | William Lawrence Bragg | Willy Brandt | Walter H. Brattain | Bertram N. Brockhouse | Herbert C. Brown | James M. Buchanan Jr. | Frank Burnet | Adolf F. Butenandt | Melvin Calvin Thomas R. Cech | Martin Chalfie | Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar | Pavel A. Cherenkov | Steven Chu | Aaron Ciechanover | Albert Claude | John Cockcroft | Claude Cohen- Tannoudji | Leon N. Cooper | Carl Cori | Allan M. Cormack | John Cornforth André F. Cournand | Francis Crick | James Cronin | Paul J. Crutzen | Robert F. Curl Jr. | Henrik Dam | Jean Dausset | Angus S. Deaton | Gérard Debreu | Petrus Debye | Hans G. Dehmelt | Johann Deisenhofer Peter A. Diamond | Paul A. M. Dirac | Peter C. Doherty | Gerhard Domagk | Esther Duflo | Renato Dulbecco | Christian de Duve John Eccles | Gerald M. Edelman | Manfred Eigen | Gertrude B. Elion | Robert F. Engle III | François Englert | Richard R. Ernst Gerhard Ertl | Leo Esaki | Ulf von Euler | Hans von Euler- Chelpin | Martin J. Evans | John B. Fenn | Bernard L. Feringa Albert Fert | Ernst O. Fischer | Edmond H. Fischer | Val Fitch | Paul J.