DOCSLIB.ORG

A Geologic and Topographic Section

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

K\ I A Geologic and Topographic Section ACROSS SOUTHERN INDIANA FRo>! THE OHIO RIV.R, AT HANOVER, TO THE W ARASiI RIVER, AT VINOENNES, WITH A DIS­ OUSSION OF THI! GIINERAL DISTRIRUTION AND CHARACTER OF THII KNOB- STOllE GROUP IN THE STATE OF INDIANA. BY JOHN FLESHER. NEVVSOM. St~nford Unjv~rsitr, Califor)lia, 1901. -ZJJT- TRANSMITTAL. Prof. W. S. Blatchley, Dear Sir-I hand you 'th my report on a geologic and topo­ graphic section acrass OVCWHI"" Indiana from Hanover to Vincennes, with a discussion of the distribution of the Knobstone group in the State of Indiana, I remain very respectfully yours, J. F. NEWSOM. -228- ,CONTENTS. P.AGJO:. Introduction. • . .. • • . • . .. • ....••.....••••.....•...•...... 232 General Observations ............•........................••..•..... 235 Stratigraphy ...•........••.....•..•...........•............•... 235 Ordovician .............•.•.....•.......................... 235 Silurian ....•...................•.••............••..•...... 235 Devonian .........•..•..•••........•.......•...••......••. .)35 Lower Carboniferous ......••.........• , .•.........•........ 235, Coal Measures .............. , .....................•.....•.. 286 Permo-carboniferous ....................................... 236 Pleistocene ............................................... 236 Structure .......••.•...........•............ · .. ··.···· •. · .. ··· . 238 Topography ........................... , ...... " ............... 238 The Formations in Detail ...............•...........................• 239 Ordovician ........•.•........ .............................. 239 Hudson River group ....................................... 239 Character of rocks ...............•...................... 239 Areal distribution .................................... 240 Detailed sections. .. .................................. 240 Silurian ..•.................................................... 244 Clinton ............•..................................•...... 244 Character and distribution •...•..................•...... 244 Topography and general remarks .....•.........•........ 244 Niagara ....•.•.•....•..........•...•..............•.•..... 245 Character .••.......................•.•.......•........ 245 Areal distribution ...........•.....................•... 245 Topography .........................•...••............ 246 Economic geology ........•............................. 246 Devonian ..................................................... 246 The limestones .•••.....•................•......•..•.....•.. 247 Corniferous .....••.... ; ........................•.•........• 248 Character and thickness ............................... 248 Areal distribution and 'opography .••.................... 248 Hamilton limestones .........••....•.....•.....•••......... , 248 Character ............................................ .. 248 Areal distribution ............ , ......................... ' 249 Silver Creek Hydraulic limestone .......................... .. 249 Sellersburg limestone .......••..•.••..•••..... , .........• , .. 250 Economic geology ..........•..••.•.....•.........•••... 250 Topography and structure .••.•...•.••....••............ 260 Paleontology .•••..•• '.' ..•.•..••.••...........••...••.•• 951 16-Geol. -229- 230 . REPORT OF STATE GEOLOGIST. PAOli., New Albany black shale ..•.••. , .....••..•...•...•..•...•••. 261 Character •..••............•.•.........•••.•.•...•..•... 251 Stratigraphic position •...•..•......•........•.•....•..• 252 PaleontOlogy .•••. " .••.•..............•.•..... ',' •.•.... 263 Areal distribution ...•...............•••................ 253 Topography ...............•.............•...........•.. 254 Economic geology ....•....•.............•..•..••....... 255 Lower Carboniferous ., ...........•..••.•.•••.•..................••. 235 Rockford goniatite lim.st~fe .............................. .. 255 Character and distribJtion ............................. 265 Stratigraphic position .................................. 297 Paleontology ......•..•.............................•... 268 Economic geology and topography ...................... 260 The Knobstone group of Indiana ................................... 260 Introductory ....................•................•............ , 260 , Character and thickness of the rocks. " ................. , ....... 261 The NeW' Providence shale ............................•..... 261 The Upper Knobstone shale .......... , ..................... 261 The Knobstone sandstone ....................... , ......... .. 261 Transition beds .•..........................•............... 262 Thickness of the Knobstone group ...... , ................... 262 Areal distribution ............................................. 263 Toporraphy ................................. " ............... 266 The southern district . .. ........................... 266 The central district ..........................•.......... 268 The northern district ......•............................ 269 Topographic features common to both central and southern districts. 269 Differential weathering of the Knobstone strata ............•.• 270 Exfoliation •.................•............................. 273 Structure ....•....•.............................. , .. , ......... 273 Dips of the strata ......................................••... 273 Fault •..••......................................•......... 274 Unconformity ............................................. 275 Economic geology ....... ' ..................................... 276 I!Itratigraphic posHion .........•..•....•.................•....... 277 Lower Carboniferous strata exclusive of the Knob.tone and Rockford goniatite limestone ..•............................................ 280 The Harrodsburg, limestone ................................ 280 Character and thickness ................ '................ 280 Areal distribution .....'. " .................. " ......... 280 Topography .......•.... " ...... ' ...........•........... 280 The Bedford oolitic limestone .............................. 281 Character. .. • ..............., ......................... 281 Color .......••••....................................... 281 Areal distribution .............•................•.....•. 281 Toporraphy .......' ...........•...............•..•••.•• 281 Economic geology ... ~ ........••.......................• i81 The Mitchell limestone ...•.................•..............• 282 Character •..............•.....••••.......•.••..••..•.•. 282 Areal distribution •..••• " ...•••....•.•....• " ........•. 2811 GEOLOGIC SEOTION AOROSS SOUTHERN INDIANA. 231 P.lGE. Lower Carboniferou8 Itrata, etc.-Continued. Topography............................. ........•.•. •••• 282 Economic geology • • . • . • • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • 282 The Kaakaakia. group. .. .. .. .. • . • .. .. • . .. .. • .• 283 Cha.ra.cter.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. • .. .. .. 283 Areal Distribution...................................... 283 Topogra.phy ............. " . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... • . • 283 Economic ,eology . • . • . • . • • . • 284 Upper Carboniferous. ........ ...................... ............ .... 284 The Ha..al sa.ndatone . • • . • • • . • . • • . • . • . • • . • . 284 Gharactel' .....•• , ••• , . • . • • . • • . • .. .... 284 Areal dist.ribution .... •. .. .. .. .. .. • . .. .. .. .. .. .. 286 Topography ......•.....•......................•••. •. 285 Economic: geology. • • • . • . • • . • .. • . • • • . 285 The Productive Coal Measures .................. .. .. .. .. 286 Character and distribution .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 286 Topography .....................••..........•..••..• , . • 286 Bconomic geology. • . • • • . • • . • • . •• . • • • . • . • . • • • • 286 The Merom Band.tone .••• , •..............••.•..•• , . • . • • . 287 Pleistocene .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 287 The draina.ge of southern Indiana . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 288 Introduction ••••••.•.••.......•......................... , •• .. .. 288 The eastern drainage area .• ; .....••••.....•.•.....•.•...•• " 290 The centra.l drainage area................... ................ 291 The southern district................................... 292 The northern district ........ , .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 293 The western drainage area . • . .. .. .. .. .. .. • • .. • . .. .. • • 2116 Summary. • . • . • • • . • • • • . • . • . • . • • . • • •• • • • ••• • . 298 Conclusion ••••••••.•..•••••..................•..••.• , •• •• . • . 299 INTRODUCTION. The following paper relates to the geological formations repre­ sented in southern Indiana, especially where these are crossed by the row of townships nU:illbered 3 north. The field work, on which the paper is ba8'ed, was done in 1896-1897-1898.* During this time a "topographic map was con'struc·ted covering a strip of country six miles wide, and extending from the Ohio Riv·er in the neighborhood of Madi8'on on the east to the W.abash River at Vincennes on the weilt. This section passes over the various formations exposed in this part of the State, beginning in the Ordovi­ cian rocks at the east and ending with the Merom sandstone 01 Car­ boniferous (or Post-Carboniferous age) at the west. Some glacial deposits are also cross.ed by this section, but no attempt has been made to outline the glacial deposits in detail. The distribution of the other rocks in the area covered by the topographic section is shown on the geologic map accompanying it. On this sheet Plate II is a profile of cross-sections showing the general strud­ ture and sequence of the
Recommended publications
  • (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York

    (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York

    Revised Stratigraphy and Correlations of the Niagaran Provincial Series (Medina, Clinton, and Lockport Groups) in the Type Area of Western New York By Carlton E. Brett, Dorothy H. Tepper, William M. Goodman, Steven T. LoDuca, and Bea-Yeh Eckert U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2086 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences of the University of Rochester UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1995 10 REVISED STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATIONS OF THE NIAGARAN PROVINCIAL SERIES been made in accordance with the NASC. Because the The history of nomenclature of what is now termed the NASC does not allow use of the "submember" category, Medina Group, beginning with Conrad ( 1837) and ending units that would be of this rank are treated as informal units with Bolton (1953), is presented in Fisher (1954); Bolton and have been given alphanumeric designations. Informal (1957, table 2) presents a detailed summary of this nomen- units are discussed under the appropriate "member" clature for 1910-53. A historical summary of nomenclature categories. of the Medina Group in the Niagara region is shown in fig- The use of quotes for stratigraphic nomenclature in this ure 7. Early investigators of the Medina include Conrad report is restricted to units that have been misidentified or (1837); Vanuxem (1840, first usage of Medina; 1842); Hall abandoned. If stratigraphic nomenclature for a unit has (1840, 1843); Gilbert (1899); Luther (1899); Fairchild changed over time, the term for the unit is shown, with cap- (1901); Grabau (1901, 1905, 1908, 1909, 1913); Kindle and italization, as given in whatever reference is cited rather Taylor (1913); Kindle (1914); Schuchert (1914); Chadwick than according to the most recent nomenclature.
  • Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    Figure 3A. Major Geologic Formations in West Virginia. Allegheney And

    82° 81° 80° 79° 78° EXPLANATION West Virginia county boundaries A West Virginia Geology by map unit Quaternary Modern Reservoirs Qal Alluvium Permian or Pennsylvanian Period LTP d Dunkard Group LTP c Conemaugh Group LTP m Monongahela Group 0 25 50 MILES LTP a Allegheny Formation PENNSYLVANIA LTP pv Pottsville Group 0 25 50 KILOMETERS LTP k Kanawha Formation 40° LTP nr New River Formation LTP p Pocahontas Formation Mississippian Period Mmc Mauch Chunk Group Mbp Bluestone and Princeton Formations Ce Obrr Omc Mh Hinton Formation Obps Dmn Bluefield Formation Dbh Otbr Mbf MARYLAND LTP pv Osp Mg Greenbrier Group Smc Axis of Obs Mmp Maccrady and Pocono, undivided Burning Springs LTP a Mmc St Ce Mmcc Maccrady Formation anticline LTP d Om Dh Cwy Mp Pocono Group Qal Dhs Ch Devonian Period Mp Dohl LTP c Dmu Middle and Upper Devonian, undivided Obps Cw Dhs Hampshire Formation LTP m Dmn OHIO Ct Dch Chemung Group Omc Obs Dch Dbh Dbh Brailler and Harrell, undivided Stw Cwy LTP pv Ca Db Brallier Formation Obrr Cc 39° CPCc Dh Harrell Shale St Dmb Millboro Shale Mmc Dhs Dmt Mahantango Formation Do LTP d Ojo Dm Marcellus Formation Dmn Onondaga Group Om Lower Devonian, undivided LTP k Dhl Dohl Do Oriskany Sandstone Dmt Ot Dhl Helderberg Group LTP m VIRGINIA Qal Obr Silurian Period Dch Smc Om Stw Tonoloway, Wills Creek, and Williamsport Formations LTP c Dmb Sct Lower Silurian, undivided LTP a Smc McKenzie Formation and Clinton Group Dhl Stw Ojo Mbf Db St Tuscarora Sandstone Ordovician Period Ojo Juniata and Oswego Formations Dohl Mg Om Martinsburg Formation LTP nr Otbr Ordovician--Trenton and Black River, undivided 38° Mmcc Ot Trenton Group LTP k WEST VIRGINIA Obr Black River Group Omc Ordovician, middle calcareous units Mp Db Osp St.
  • Structural Geology of the Transylvania Fault Zone in Bedford County, Pennsylvania

    Structural Geology of the Transylvania Fault Zone in Bedford County, Pennsylvania

    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Elizabeth Lauren Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Elizabeth Lauren, "STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA" (2009). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 621. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/621 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Transverse zones cross strike of thrust-belt structures as large-scale alignments of cross-strike structures. The Transylvania fault zone is a set of discontinuous right-lateral transverse faults striking at about 270º across Appalachian thrust-belt structures along 40º N latitude in Pennsylvania. Near Everett, Pennsylvania, the Breezewood fault terminates with the Ashcom thrust fault. The Everett Gap fault terminates westward with the Hartley thrust fault. Farther west, the Bedford fault extends westward to terminate against the Wills Mountain thrust fault. The rocks, deformed during the Alleghanian orogeny, are semi-independently deformed on opposite sides of the transverse fault, indicating fault movement during folding and thrusting. Palinspastic restorations of cross sections on either side of the fault zone are used to compare transverse fault displacement.
  • United States National Museum Bulletin 262

    United States National Museum Bulletin 262

    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION MUSEUM O F NATURAL HISTORY For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price 70 cents UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 262 Catalog of the Type Specimens of Invertebrate Fossils LOUIS R. PURNELL Part I: Paleozoic Cephalopoda SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1968 Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum in- clude two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly ac- quired facts in the field of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related sub- jects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the the needs of the presentation. Since 1902, papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.
  • B2150-B FRONT Final

    B2150-B FRONT Final

    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
  • Type Kinderhook Ammonoids

    Type Kinderhook Ammonoids

    Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science Volume 80 Number Article 6 1973 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. Furnish University of Iowa Walter L. Manger University of Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1973 Iowa Academy of Science, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias Recommended Citation Furnish, W. M. and Manger, Walter L. (1973) "Type Kinderhook Ammonoids," Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science, 80(1), 15-24. Available at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pias/vol80/iss1/6 This Research is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa Academy of Science at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science by an authorized editor of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Furnish and Manger: Type Kinderhook Ammonoids 15 Type Kinderhook Ammonoids W. M. FURNISH1 and WALTER L. MANGER FURNISH, W. M. and WALTER L. MANGER. Type Kinderhook Am­ and the associated conodont faunal data. The Kinderhookian monoids. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci., 80( 1): 15-24, 1973. Wassonville Member of the Hampton Formation in southeastern SYNOPSIS: Lower Mississippian rocks in the type area of North Iowa and the Chouteau Limestone of Missouri fall within the America have produced only a few scattered ammonoid cephalo­ lower "Pericyclus-Stufe" of the upper Tournaisian Stage as these pods. Those specimens from southeastern Iowa and northwestern units are designated for the early Lower Carboniferous of Western Missouri lie within the general vicinity of the designated type Europe.
  • Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups

    Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups

    APPENDIX Synoptic Taxonomy of Major Fossil Groups Important fossil taxa are listed down to the lowest practical taxonomic level; in most cases, this will be the ordinal or subordinallevel. Abbreviated stratigraphic units in parentheses (e.g., UCamb-Ree) indicate maximum range known for the group; units followed by question marks are isolated occurrences followed generally by an interval with no known representatives. Taxa with ranges to "Ree" are extant. Data are extracted principally from Harland et al. (1967), Moore et al. (1956 et seq.), Sepkoski (1982), Romer (1966), Colbert (1980), Moy-Thomas and Miles (1971), Taylor (1981), and Brasier (1980). KINGDOM MONERA Class Ciliata (cont.) Order Spirotrichia (Tintinnida) (UOrd-Rec) DIVISION CYANOPHYTA ?Class [mertae sedis Order Chitinozoa (Proterozoic?, LOrd-UDev) Class Cyanophyceae Class Actinopoda Order Chroococcales (Archean-Rec) Subclass Radiolaria Order Nostocales (Archean-Ree) Order Polycystina Order Spongiostromales (Archean-Ree) Suborder Spumellaria (MCamb-Rec) Order Stigonematales (LDev-Rec) Suborder Nasselaria (Dev-Ree) Three minor orders KINGDOM ANIMALIA KINGDOM PROTISTA PHYLUM PORIFERA PHYLUM PROTOZOA Class Hexactinellida Order Amphidiscophora (Miss-Ree) Class Rhizopodea Order Hexactinosida (MTrias-Rec) Order Foraminiferida* Order Lyssacinosida (LCamb-Rec) Suborder Allogromiina (UCamb-Ree) Order Lychniscosida (UTrias-Rec) Suborder Textulariina (LCamb-Ree) Class Demospongia Suborder Fusulinina (Ord-Perm) Order Monaxonida (MCamb-Ree) Suborder Miliolina (Sil-Ree) Order Lithistida
  • Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992

    Key, M. M., Jr. and N. Potter, Jr. 1992

    Guidebook for the llth Annual Field Trip of the Harrisburg Area Geological Society May 9, 1992 Paleozoic Geology of the Paw Paw-Hancock Area of Maryland and West Virginia by Marcus M. Key, Jr. and Noel Potter, Jr. Dickinson College TABLE OF CONTENTS . .. List of F1gures . .............................................. 111 Introduction . ....................................... · ......... 1 Road Log • ..•... • ..... · .... • •.....•....•...•......• e ••• '0 ••••••••• 3 Stop 1. Roundtop Hill . ............ o •••••••••• o •••••••••••••••••• 5 stop 2. Sideling Hill Road Cut ..•.••............••.••••......... 8 Stop 3. Sideling Hill Diamictite Exposure ....•.•....•.•....•... 11 Stop 4. Cacapon Mountain Overlook .••.......•......•.•••••...... 15 Stop 5. Fluted Rocks Overlook .•..•••.••....•.•.•••.•........... 16 Stop 6. Fluted Rocks ................. .,. .......... ., o ••••• ., •••••• • 19 Stop 7. Berkeley Springs state Park •...•.....................•. 20 Acknowled·gments . ........................... :- ... e ••••••••••••••• 21 References .....••.•..•.•••.•..•.•..•.••......................•. 2 2 Topogrpphic maps covering field trip stops: USGS 7 1/2 minute quadrangles Bellegrove (MD-PA-WV), Great Cacapon (WV-MD), Hancock (WV-MD-PA) Cover Photo: Anticline in Silurian Bloomsburg Formation. From Stose and swartz (1912). The anticline is visible from the towpath of the c & 0 Canal at Roundtop Hill (Stop# 1). Guidebook copies may be obtained by writing: Harrisburg Area Geological Society cjo Pennsylvania Geological Survey P.O. Box 2357 Harrisburg,
  • Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Italic Page Numbers Indicate Major References]

    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, 411 379 Bear River Formation, 163 Abo Formation, 281, 282, 286, 302 seismicity, 22 Bear Springs Formation, 315 Absaroka Mountains, 111 Appalachian Orogen, 5, 9, 13, 28 Bearpaw cyclothem, 80 Absaroka sequence, 37, 44, 50, 186, Appalachian Plateau, 9, 427 Bearpaw Mountains, 111 191,233,251, 275, 377, 378, Appalachian Province, 28 Beartooth Mountains, 201, 203 383, 409 Appalachian Ridge, 427 Beartooth shelf, 92, 94 Absaroka thrust fault, 158, 159 Appalachian Shelf, 32 Beartooth uplift, 92, 110, 114 Acadian orogen, 403, 452 Appalachian Trough, 460 Beaver Creek thrust fault, 157 Adaville Formation, 164 Appalachian Valley, 427 Beaver Island, 366 Adirondack Mountains, 6, 433 Araby Formation, 435 Beaverhead Group, 101, 104 Admire Group, 325 Arapahoe Formation, 189 Bedford Shale, 376 Agate Creek fault, 123, 182 Arapien Shale, 71, 73, 74 Beekmantown Group, 440, 445 Alabama, 36, 427,471 Arbuckle anticline, 327, 329, 331 Belden Shale, 57, 123, 127 Alacran Mountain Formation, 283 Arbuckle Group, 186, 269 Bell Canyon Formation, 287 Alamosa Formation, 169, 170 Arbuckle Mountains, 309, 310, 312, Bell Creek oil field, Montana, 81 Alaska Bench Limestone, 93 328 Bell Ranch Formation, 72, 73 Alberta shelf, 92, 94 Arbuckle Uplift, 11, 37, 318, 324 Bell Shale, 375 Albion-Scioio oil field, Michigan, Archean rocks, 5, 49, 225 Belle Fourche River, 207 373 Archeolithoporella, 283 Belt Island complex, 97, 98 Albuquerque Basin, 111, 165, 167, Ardmore Basin, 11, 37, 307, 308, Belt Supergroup, 28, 53 168, 169 309, 317, 318, 326, 347 Bend Arch, 262, 275, 277, 290, 346, Algonquin Arch, 361 Arikaree Formation, 165, 190 347 Alibates Bed, 326 Arizona, 19, 43, 44, S3, 67.
  • Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. by Marin A

    Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. by Marin A

    Basin-Centered Gas Systems of the U.S. By Marin A. Popov,1 Vito F. Nuccio,2 Thaddeus S. Dyman,2 Timothy A. Gognat,1 Ronald C. Johnson,2 James W. Schmoker,2 Michael S. Wilson,1 and Charles Bartberger1 Columbia Basin Western Washington Sweetgrass Arch (Willamette–Puget Mid-Continent Rift Michigan Basin Sound Trough) (St. Peter Ss) Appalachian Basin (Clinton–Medina Snake River and older Fms) Hornbrook Basin Downwarp Wasatch Plateau –Modoc Plateau San Rafael Swell (Dakota Fm) Sacramento Basin Hanna Basin Great Denver Basin Basin Santa Maria Basin (Monterey Fm) Raton Basin Arkoma Park Anadarko Los Angeles Basin Chuar Basin Basin Group Basins Black Warrior Basin Colville Basin Salton Mesozoic Rift Trough Permian Basin Basins (Abo Fm) Paradox Basin (Cane Creek interval) Central Alaska Rio Grande Rift Basins (Albuquerque Basin) Gulf Coast– Travis Peak Fm– Gulf Coast– Cotton Valley Grp Austin Chalk; Eagle Fm Cook Inlet Open-File Report 01–135 Version 1.0 2001 This report is preliminary, has not been reviewed for conformity with U. S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature, and should not be reproduced or distributed. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. 1Geologic consultants on contract to the USGS 2USGS, Denver U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey BASIN-CENTERED GAS SYSTEMS OF THE U.S. DE-AT26-98FT40031 U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory Contractor: U.S. Geological Survey Central Region Energy Team DOE Project Chief: Bill Gwilliam USGS Project Chief: V.F.
  • Microfacies Analysis and Hydrocarbon Potential of the Rockford/Chouteau Limestone in the Illinois Basin a Thesis Submitted to Th

    Microfacies Analysis and Hydrocarbon Potential of the Rockford/Chouteau Limestone in the Illinois Basin a Thesis Submitted to Th

    1 MICROFACIES ANALYSIS AND HYDROCARBON POTENTIAL OF THE ROCKFORD/CHOUTEAU LIMESTONE IN THE ILLINOIS BASIN A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE BY JACOB S. WOJCIK DR. RICHARD FLUEGEMAN – ADVISOR BALL STATE UNIVERSITY MUNCIE, INDIANA JULY 2017 2 Table of Contents Page Number ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………... 3 LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………….. 6 LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………….... 8 LIST OF APPENDICES………………………………………………………….. 8 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………… 9 GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND…………………………………………………… 10 Location…………………………………………………………………….. 10 Tectonics of the Illinois Basin……………………………………………... 11 Stratigraphy and Depositional Sequences ……………………………….. 15 Subsidence History ………………………………………………………... 18 Previous Work……………………………………………………………... 20 Exploration History………………………………………………………... 21 METHODS………………………………………………………………………… 24 Sample Collection………………………………………………………….. 24 Thin Section Preparation………………………………………………….. 26 Thin Section Analysis……………………………………………………… 27 RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………... 29 Location of Wells & Structure…………………………………………….. 29 Well Log Correlation………………………………………………………. 33 Microfacies Analysis……………………………………………………….. 35 Porosity Results…………………………………………………………….. 70 DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………. 77 Depositional Environments………………………………………………... 77 Hydrocarbon Potential…………………………………………………….. 87 CONCLUSIONS………………………………………………………………….... 92 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………... 94 APPENDICES………………………………………………………………………
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Clinton Sandstone, Located in Perry, Fairfield, and Vinton Counties

    Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Clinton Sandstone, Located in Perry, Fairfield, and Vinton Counties

    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE CLINTON SANDSTONE, LOCATED IN PERRY, FAIRFIELD, AND VINTON COUNTIES Craig Allen Stouten A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Charles Onasch Jeff Snyder ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor This paper focuses on the depositional environment of the “Clinton Sandstone” located in Perry, Fairfield, and Vinton Counties in central and southeastern Ohio. Core from wells numbered 2866, 2941, 2942, 2943, 2965, and 2980 were accessed from the Ohio Geological Survey, H.R. Collins Core Laboratory. Each core was described, photographed, and sampled for thin sections and lithofacies analysis. In addition, gamma-ray and neutron density logs were acquired for each well. The geophysical logs were used for litho-correlation and to examine 3-D architecture. This new data was used to re-evaluate the depositional interpretations. The “Clinton Sandstone” is an informal name given to the Lower Silurian sandstone unit that stratigraphically lies between the Cabot Head Shale and the Neagha Shale in southeastern Ohio. The “Clinton Sandstone” correlates with the Tuscarora Sandstone in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Confusingly, the “Clinton Sandstone” is not related to the Upper Silurian Clinton Group located in western New York. Previous workers have interpreted the “Clinton Sandstone” to be part of a wide range of environments, from fluvial-deltaic to a strand plain, and incorporating tidal channels, delta plains, crevasse-splays, and offshore marine deposits. This study confirms some, but not all of the previous interpretations, finding the “Clinton Sandstone” to be part of a delta plain, delta front, and prodelta environment.