Outcrop Features of the Mansfield Formation in Southwestern Indiana

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Outcrop Features of the Mansfield Formation in Southwestern Indiana OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA by Henry H. Gray Indiana Department of Conservation GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Report of Progress No. 26 1962 STATE OF INDIANA Matthew E. Welsh, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Donald E. Foltz, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John B. Patton, State Geologist Bloomington ______________________________________ Report of Progress No. 26 _____________________________________________________ OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA by Henry H. Gray Printed by authority of the State of Indiana BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA November 1962 ____________________________________________________________________ For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Ind. Price 25 cents SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATTON, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS, Assistant State Geologist DUNCAN J. McGREGOR, Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL SECTION GEOPHYSICS SECTION CHARLES E. WIER, Geologist and Head MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head S. A. FRIEDMAN, Geologist ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist HAROLD C. HUTCHISON, Geologist CHARLES S. MILLER, Instrument Maker HOWARD W. LEE, Paleobotanist ALBERT J. RUDMAN, Geophysicist RICHARD L. POWELL, Geologist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist WILLIAM C. RICHARDSON, Geological Assistant GLEN L. WORKMAN, Driller WAYNE COX, Assistant Driller ARTHUR WAYNE AYNES, Geophysical Assistant DRAFTING AND PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION WILLIAM H. MORAN, Chief Draftsman ROBERT E. JUDAH, Geological Artist-Draftsman INDUSTRIAL MINERALS SECTION MICKY P. LOVE, Geological Draftsman JOHN E. PEACE, Senior Geological Draftsman LAWRENCE F. ROONEY, Geologist and Head GEORGE R. RINGER, Photographer NED M. SMITH, Geologist JACK A. SUNDERMAN, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVICES R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head PETROLEUM SECTION T. A. DAWSON, Geologist and Head GEOCHEMISTRY SECTION LEROY E. BECKER, Geologist G. L. CARPENTER, Geologist R. K. LEININGER, Geochemist and Head ANDREW J. HREHA, Geologist MAYNARD E. COLLER, Chemist STANLEY KELLER, Geologist JACK L. HARRISON, X-ray Mineralogist HOWARD SMITH, Geologist MA MA LAY, Spectrographer DAN M. SULLIVAN, Geologist LOUIS V. MILLER, Coal Chemist G. A. ABBOTT, Geological Assistant E. M. CRAIG, Geochemical Assistant JAMES T. CAZEE, Geological Assistant PHILLIP W. CAZEE, Geological Assistant JOHN R. HELMS, Geological Assistant GEOLOGY SECTION ROBERT H. SHAVER, Paleontologist and Head HENRY H. GRAY, Head Stratigrapher PUBLICATIONS SECTION WILLIAM J. WAYNE, Head Glacial Geologist ALLAN F. SCHNEIDER, Glacial Geologist GERALD S. WOODARD, Editor and Head CARL B. REXROAD, Paleontologist LEWIS W. NELLINGER. Sales and Record Clerk CONTENTS 3 Page Abstract- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Introduction- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 Location and extent of the Mansfield Formation- - - - - - - - - - 7 Thickness and general lithologic constitution- - - - - - - - - - - 12 Stratigraphic and structural relations, paleontology, and age - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -13 Major lithologic types - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 Source of information and sampling procedures - - - - - - - - - -15 Description and distribution of the coarser clastic rocks - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -18 Cross- stratified sandstones- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 Thinly stratified sandstones- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -20 Other sandstones - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -21 Description and distribution of the finer clastic rocks - - - - - 21 Gray shales- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -21 Black shales- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -22 Other shales - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -22 Mudstones, siltstones, and clays- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -23 Description and distribution of the nonclastic rocks - - - - - - -24 Coals - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -24 Limestones and cherts - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 Iron ores - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -25 Lithologic features distinctive of the Mansfield Formation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 Origin of the rock sequences - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 Cyclic sedimentation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 Regional variations in lithologic proportions - - - - - - - - - - - -28 Identification of lithofacies in the Mansfield Formation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -28 Distribution of lithofacies in outcrop area- - - - - - - - - - -29 Genetic implications of the lithofacies patterns - - - - - - 32 Literature cited - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 Appendix - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 4 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map of southwestern Indiana showing extent of the Mansfield Formation- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 2. Generalized stratigraphic column of the Mansfield Formation in Indiana showing position of principal key beds and members - - - - - - - - - - - 11 3. Map of southwestern Indiana showing location of measured sections, including three core holes, used in lithologic summaries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 4. Graphic representation of relative abundance of the various rock types in the Mansfield Formation and in rocks of late Mississippian age- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 5. Graphic comparison of representative cyclic sedimentary sequences in the Mansfield Formation with the "typical" cyclothem of Illinois- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 6. Map of southwestern Indiana showing location of measured stratigraphic sections that include 40 feet or more of exposed Mansfield Formation, with lithofacies identified- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 7. Stratigraphic diagram along the outcrop belt of the Mansfield Formation showing relationship of named lithofacies and position of principal named coal beds- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 8. Three representative deltas along the Gulf Coast of Southern United States - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33 TABLES 5 Page Table 1. Names of rock units of late Devonian, Mississippian, and early Pennsylvanian age in Indiana - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 2. Relative proportions of principal rock types in the Mansfield Formation and four groups of formations of late Mississippian age - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 3. Criteria for distinguishing rocks of the Mansfield Formation from those of late Mississippian age - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -26 OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA By Henry H. Gray ABSTRACT The Mansfield Formation of early Pennsylvanian age crops out in an area of approximately 1,700 square miles in southwestern Indiana. Three-fifths of the formation consists of sandstone; most of the remainder is finer clastic rocks. Limestone, chert, coal, and iron ore make up approximately 2 percent of the formation. Many similar rock types are found among the several formations upon which the Mansfield unconformably rests, but the assignment of questionable outcrops either to the Mansfield Formation or to an older formation can usually be accomplished with some confidence, because many outcrops contain either diagnostic rock types or indicative rock features. The various rocks of the Mansfield Formation are, for the most part, arranged in a crudely cyclic pattern. The several cyclic units of a region tend to be similar in makeup and different f rom those of adjacent regions. Three lithofacies that reflect these areal variations can be recognized and are here named: the Shoals Lithofacies is characterized by cross-stratified sandstones, the Bloomfield Lithofacies by gray shales, and the Cannelton Lithofacies by mudstones and thick clays. The distribution of these lithofacies suggests that these rocks were deposited at or near the shoreline, that there was a fairly large delta in the southern part of the outcrop area, and that this delta was an important factor controlling the sedimentary pattern during early Pennsylvanian time. INTRODUCTION LOCATION AND EXTENT OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION Beneath the surface soils in the southern part of Indiana and beneath the glacial deposits in the west- central part of the State, in a belt some 5 to 20 miles wide extending from Cannelton on the Ohio River nearly to the Illinois State line a few miles northwest of Attica, lies a sequence of sandstones and shales that are included in the Mansfield Formation (fig. 1). This is the lowest and the oldest of the formations of Pennsylvanian age in Indiana (table 1). The geographic name, taken from the town of Mansfield, about 10 miles 7 8 OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION Figure 1. --Map of southwestern Indiana showing extent of the Mansfield Formation. INTRODUCTION 9 Table 1.-Names of rock units of late Devonian, Mississippian, and early Pennsylvanian age in Indiana Age Rock unit Brazil Lower Block Coal Formation Shady Lane
Recommended publications
  • Two New Crinoids from Lower Mississippian Rocks in Southeastern Kentucky
    TWO NEW CRINOIDS FROM LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS IN SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY BY GEORGE M. EHLERS AND ROBERT V. KESLING Reprinted from JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY Val. 37, No. 5, September, 1963 JOURNALOF PALEONTOLOGY,V. 37, NO. 5, P. 1028-1041, PLS. 133,134, 3 TEXT-FIGS., SEPTEMBER,1963 TWO NEW CRINOIDS FROM L20\'C7ERMISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS IN SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY GEORGE M. EHLERS AKD ROBERT V. ICESLING Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan .~BsTR.~~T-AII~~~~specimens collected many years ago bl- the senior author and his students near Mill Springs, Kentucky, are a new species of Agaricocrinzis and a new speries of Actino- crinites. Although only one specimen of each is known, it is well preserved. The new Agnrico- crinus bears a resemblance to A. ponderoszts Wood, and the new Actinocriniles to four species described by Miller & Gurley: A. spergenensis, A. botuztosz~s,A. gibsoni, and A. shnronensis. A preliminary survey of species assigned to Agaricocrinz~ssuggests that revision of the genus is overdue. Although the occurrence of the specimens leaves some doubt as to their stratigraphic posi- tion, we conclude that they both probably weathered from the Fort Payne formation and rolled down the slope onto the New Providence, where they were found. The sites where the crinoids were picked up are now deeply inundated by water impounded by the Wolf Creek dam on the Cumberland River. INTRODUCTION onto the New Providence, \$here they were OTH of the new crinoids described here are found. rZt present, both the New Providence B from Lower Mississippian rocks in the valley formation and the I~asalbeds of the Fort Payne of the Cumberland River in Wayne and Russell are underwater at the type locality of the new Counties, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY and ... -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE PERTH LIMESTONE MEMBER, STAUNTON FORMATION (PENNSYLVANIAN) OF THE ILLINOIS BASIN, U.S.A. CARl B. REXROAD. lEWIS M. BROWN. JOE DEVERA. and REBECCA J. SUMAN Rexroad , c.. Brown . L.. Devera, 1.. and Suman, R. 1998. Conodont biostrati graph y and paleoec ology of the Perth Limestone Member. Staunt on Form ation (Pennsy lvanian) of the Illinois Basin. U.S.A. Ill: H. Szaniawski (ed .), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conodont Symposium (ECOS VI). - Palaeont ologia Polonica, 58 . 247-259. Th e Perth Limestone Member of the Staunton Formation in the southeastern part of the Illinois Basin co nsists ofargill aceous limestone s that are in a facies relati on ship with shales and sandstones that commonly are ca lcareous and fossiliferous. Th e Perth conodo nts are do minated by Idiognathodus incurvus. Hindeodus minutus and Neognathodu s bothrops eac h comprises slightly less than 10% of the fauna. Th e other spec ies are minor consti­ tuents. The Perth is ass igned to the Neog nathodus bothrops- N. bassleri Sub zon e of the N. bothrops Zo ne. but we were unable to co nfirm its assignment to earliest Desmoin esian as oppose d to latest Atokan. Co nodo nt biofacies associations of the Perth refle ct a shallow near- shore marine environment of generally low to moderate energy. but locali zed areas are more variable. particul ar ly in regard to salinity. K e y w o r d s : Co nodo nta. biozonation. paleoecology. Desmoinesian , Penn sylvanian. Illinois Basin. U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Columnals (PDF)
    2248 22482 2 4 V. INDEX OF COLUMNALS 8 Remarks: In this section the stratigraphic range given under the genus is the compiled range of all named species based solely on columnals assigned to the genus. It should be noted that this range may and often differs considerably from the range given under the same genus in Section I, because that range is based on species identified on cups or crowns. All other abbreviations and format follow that of Section I. Generic names followed by the type species are based on columnals. Genera, not followed by the type species, are based on cups and crowns as given in Section I. There are a number of unlisted columnal taxa from the literature that are indexed as genera recognized on cups and crowns. Bassler and Moodey (1943) did not index columnal taxa that were not new names or identified genera with the species unnamed. I have included some of the omissions of Bassler and Moodey, but have not made a search of the extensive literature specifically for the omitted citations because of time constraints. Many of these unlisted taxa are illustrated in the early state surveys of the eastern and central United States. Many of the columnal species assigned to genera based on cups or crowns are incorrect assignments. An uncertain, but significant, number of the columnal genera are synonyms of other columnal genera as they are based on different parts of the stem of a single taxon. Also a number of the columnal genera are synonyms of genera based on cups and crowns as they come from more distal parts of the stem not currently known to be associated with the cup or crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio
    SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present.
    [Show full text]
  • United States National Museum Bulletin 262
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION MUSEUM O F NATURAL HISTORY For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price 70 cents UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 262 Catalog of the Type Specimens of Invertebrate Fossils LOUIS R. PURNELL Part I: Paleozoic Cephalopoda SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION PRESS WASHINGTON, D.C. 1968 Publications of the United States National Museum The scientific publications of the United States National Museum in- clude two series, Proceedings of the United States National Museum and United States National Museum Bulletin. In these series are published original articles and monographs dealing with the collections and work of the Museum and setting forth newly ac- quired facts in the field of anthropology, biology, geology, history, and technology. Copies of each publication are distributed to libraries and scientific organizations and to specialists and others interested in the various subjects. The Proceedings, begun in 1878, are intended for the publication, in separate form, of shorter papers. These are gathered in volumes, octavo in size, with the publication date of each paper recorded in the table of contents of the volume. In the Bulletin series, the first of which was issued in 1875, appear longer, separate publications consisting of monographs (occasionally in several parts) and volumes in which are collected works on related sub- jects. Bulletins are either octavo or quarto in size, depending on the the needs of the presentation. Since 1902, papers relating to the botanical collections of the Museum have been published in the Bulletin series under the heading Contributions from the United States National Herbarium.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Geologic Contrasts in Indiana State Parks Otis W. Freeman, Indiana University The state parks of Indiana, with sites selected largely for scenic and historic reasons but partly with the intent to secure wide geo- graphical distribution for recreational purposes, contain a fairly com- plete sequence of the geological formations outcropping in the state, besides providing examples for a large majority of the physiographic principles. Evidence of vulcanism is one of the chief things missing, since all of the exposed bedrock in Indiana is of sedimentary origin. Even so, many types of igneous and metamorphic rocks can be picked up among the glacial boulders in the northern part of the state. The oldest exposed rocks are those of the Ordovician period. Ex- cellent outcrops for the study of the Ordovician strata occur in south- eastern Indiana on the west flank of the Cincinnati Arch. The beds are highly fossiliferous and one of the famous collecting grounds for the life forms of this period is near Madison. Clifty Falls State Park includes strata classified in the upper Or- dovician, the Silurian and base of the Devonian periods. The Silurian rocks occupy the hill slopes above the falls and inner gorges in the park with the Devonian capping the higher hills. The Ordovician formations in the park area from the base up- ward, begin with 25 feet of the Bellevue, followed by 115 feet of the Arnheim, 55 feet of the Waynesville, 50 feet of the Liberty, about 32 feet of the Saluda and possibly 6 feet of Whitewater. Shale predominates from the Bellevue through the Liberty and is interbedded with thin layers and lenses of limestone, and in contrast the Saluda is a thick bedded limestone with reef corals occuring near its base.
    [Show full text]
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States
    Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 COVER PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Asbestos ore 8. Aluminum ore, bauxite, Georgia 1 2 3 4 2. Lead ore, Balmat mine, N . Y. 9. Native copper ore, Keweenawan 5 6 3. Chromite-chromium ore, Washington Peninsula, Mich. 4. Zinc ore, Friedensville, Pa. 10. Porphyry molybdenum ore, Colorado 7 8 5. Banded iron-formation, Palmer, 11. Zinc ore, Edwards, N. Y. Mich. 12. Manganese nodules, ocean floor 9 10 6. Ribbon asbestos ore, Quebec, Canada 13. Botryoidal fluorite ore, Poncha Springs, Colo. 11 12 13 14 7. Manganese ore, banded rhodochrosite 14. Tungsten ore, North Carolina Geology and Resources of Fluorine in the United States Edited by DANIEL R. SHAWE With sections by D. R. SHAWE, R. E. VAN ALSTINE, R. G. WORL, A. V. HEYL, R. D. TRACE, R. L. PARKER, W. R. GRIFFITTS, C. L. SAINSBURY, and J. B. CATHCART GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 933 An evaluation of the geochemistry, geographic distribution, and geologic environments of fluorine, and descriptions of major United States fluorine mineral deposits UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1976 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR THOMAS S. KLEPPE, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 76-600061 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-02901-4 APPRAISAL OF MINERAL RESOURCES Continuing appraisal of the mineral resources of the United States is conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey in accordance with the provisions of the Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-631, Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky
    Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1528 Prepared in cooperation with the Com­ monwealth of Kentucky, Department of Economic Development and the Kentucky Geological Survey, Univer­ sity of Kentucky Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky By WILLIAM B. HOPKINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1528 Prepared in cooperation with the Com­ monwealth of Kentucky, Department of Economic Development and the Kentucky Geological Survey, Univer­ sity of Kentucky UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract._ ______________________________________________________ 1 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of investigation_____________________________ 2 Location of area_____________________________________________ 2 Method of investigation._______________________________________ 4 Acknowledgments _____________________________________________ 4 Well-numbering system ________________________________________ 4 Previous investigations_________________________________________ 5 Geography__ ____________________________________________________ 6 Drainage._-__-__-___-_-_-_-_-_________________-_________-_--_ 6 Geomorphology__ _ _ __________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Welge-Bg.Pdf (2.59
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF WELGE QUADRANGLE Illinois Department of Natural Resources Illinois Geologic Quadrangle Map ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RANDOLPH AND JACKSON COUNTIES, ILLINOIS IGQ Welge-BG William W. Shilts, Chief W. John Nelson 2007 Mk & e" 175 e" 84 sm o3 h &cv 164k" 170 k" k" 262 ^ ^ þ þüþü þ 2o o &c &s 250 h o 3 250 9 970 e" &cv -1 351e" Sª 00 136 k820 200 k" &t 62 k" 1 5 0 5 -5 N 0 J N 1 123 0 N J 757 0 e" J N N 0 J J N ª J N 0 350 J N oN J k" 87 k" Mc J S 377N 45 J k" 162 136 Mk NJ 165 N k 161 e" e" J 226 N J e" k" N S 677 J k Mk 161 145k" k"161 GS S 849 398 163 N 250 N 55 e" J k k J e" e" e" 142 k"164 172 S 395 143 k" Md S 411 i N k"142 J N N 130 k" ª J J NJ NJ NJ N N S J J N N 486 J J NJ N N J J NJ N 300 ª J N MASTER FAULT, J N &t k"46 COTTAGE GROVE FAULT SYSTEM J NJ N 205 Md 143 J 250 135 k" S k" k" N k" 41 k" k372 J 103 NJ 20 164 " 104 k k" N 0 15 J e" 248 0 EXPLANATION 150 e" e" 138 256 160 e" 5 k" 204k" k" 10 0 449 201 k" 0 350 k" 60 225 k" k"123 211 182 k" J N &cv sm Surface-mined area " k" 142 133 e k" 122 ª 150 k" 150 610 k" 150k" N e" J k" 200 &s Shelburn Formation 205 N k" J 136 k" 15 k" 0 146 142 Mk k" 282 h N k" S J 151e" ª k"153 k" &c Carbondale Formation 759 190 Desmoinesian J G 2165 N N Ü Mp J ª h, Herrin Coal Member N Mc 258 Pennsylvanian J k" N J k"123 N J J &t Tradewater Formation N &cv N J N J &cv N Md 205 J Unconformity k" N 25 J e"175 Md J N 0 J N N N J Morrowan J &cv Caseyville Formation Mps 30 Md N 730 k" J J o G N 152 N J k" N Unconformity N J J 110 " Sk e" k e" S 154 202 " k"164 S 724 e" k k" 129
    [Show full text]
  • Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route I-64
    AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF ENGINEERING SOILS OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY ROUTE 64 BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERRY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA SEPTEMBER 1965 NO. 24 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS members and Sloan Foundation; Indiana Department of Transportation http://www.archive.org/details/airphotointerpre6524yehp Progress Report AIRPHOTO INTERPRETATION OF EKGIMEERIKG SOILS INTERSTATE ROUTE 1-64? BETWEEN SCALESVILLE AND NEW ALBANY IN WARRICK, SPENCER, DUBOIS, PERSY, CRAWFORD, HARRISON AND FLOYD COUNTIES, INDIANA Tos G. A. Leonards, Director Joint Highway Research Project September 24, 1965 Frooj H. L Michael, Associate Director Files 1-5-5 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-51E The steadied report entitled "Airphoto Interpretation of Engineering Soils of Interstate Route 1-64 between Scalesville and New Albany in Warrick, Spencer, Dubois, Perry, Crawford, Harrison and Floyd Counties, Indiana," completes the project concerned with engineering soils napping of the Interstate system from aerial photographs This project was prepared as a part of an investigation conducted by Joint Highway Research Project in cooperation with the Indiana State Highway Coaaisslon, the Bureau of Public Roadn and the Soil Conservation Service. The report was prepared by P. T. Yeh Research Engineer, Joint Highway Research Project The soil mapping of 1-64 between Scslesville and flew Albany was done entirely by airphoto interpretation technique To Increase the value, the soil strip nap was prepared on a photographic base with annotation to show soil areas The generalized soil profiles were .prepared from the available literature. Respectfully submitted. ?/? 7*~A~S H. L.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Mississippian Hexactinellid Sponge from the Western Gondwana: Taxonomic and Paleobiogeographic Implications
    A new Mississippian hexactinellid sponge from the western Gondwana: Taxonomic and paleobiogeographic implications MARCELO G. CARRERA, JUAN JOSE RUSTÁN, N. EMILIO VACCARI, and MIGUEL EZPELETA Carrera, M.G., Rustán, J.J., Vaccari N.E., and Ezpeleta, M. 2018. A new Mississippian hexactinellid sponge from the western Gondwana: Taxonomic and paleobiogeographic implications. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 63 (1): 63–70. A Mississippian hexactinellid sponge from the western Argentina improves the extremely poor late Paleozoic sponge records from Gondwana. The sponge is included in the subfamily Thysanodictyinae of family Dictyospongiidae. The new genus and species Minitaspongia parvis is erected, and its well-preserved spicular structure is described in detail repre- senting the first approximation of the spicule assemblage in Thysanodictyinae. The skeleton is clathrate, three-dimensional with at least two ranks of rectangular openings. This first report of this subfamily outside North America represents the best-known hexactinellid and the first dictyosponge record from the Carboniferous of Gondwana. Unlike the occurrences of Thysanodictyinae in North America, with thick skeletons linked to high-energy shallow water settings, Minitaspongia occurs in low-energy water siliciclastic settings related to a cold climate and glacimarine deposits. Accordingly, the complex wall structure of this sponge should not be invoked as a necessary adaptation to high energy and shallow water settings. Key words: Porifera, Hexactinellida, Reticulosa, Carboniferous, Mississippian, Argentina. Marcelo G. Carrera [[email protected]], CICTERRA-CONICET Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales, Av. Vélez Sarfield 1611, Ciudad Universitaria, 5016, Córdoba, Argentina. Juan José Rustan [[email protected]], N. Emilio Vaccari [[email protected]], and Miguel Ezpeleta [[email protected]], CICTERRA-CONICET Universidad Nacional de Córdoba and Universidad Nacional de La Rioja, Av.
    [Show full text]