Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1528 Prepared in cooperation with the Com­ monwealth of Kentucky, Department of Economic Development and the Kentucky Geological Survey, Univer­ sity of Kentucky Geology and Ground- Water Resources of the Scottsville Area Kentucky By WILLIAM B. HOPKINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1528 Prepared in cooperation with the Com­ monwealth of Kentucky, Department of Economic Development and the Kentucky Geological Survey, Univer­ sity of Kentucky UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract._ ______________________________________________________ 1 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of investigation_____________________________ 2 Location of area_____________________________________________ 2 Method of investigation._______________________________________ 4 Acknowledgments _____________________________________________ 4 Well-numbering system ________________________________________ 4 Previous investigations_________________________________________ 5 Geography__ ____________________________________________________ 6 Drainage._-__-__-___-_-_-_-_-_________________-_________-_--_ 6 Geomorphology__ _ _ __________________________________________ 6 Climate ______________________________________________________ 7 Population and culture_________________________________________ 9 Transportation._ ______________________________________________ 9 Mineral resources____________________________________________ 9 Geology _--__---_--______-___-_-_________________-_______-_-_----- 10 Stratigraphy. _________________________________________________ lO Rocks of Cambrian and Ordovician age__--_---__-___________ 1^ Limestones of Silurian and Devonian age_____________________ ll Shale of Devonian age_-_________________----___----___---- l3 Mississippian system_____--______-__--____---_-_----------- 1^ Kinderhook and Osage series..-_________________________ 14 Meramec series_-_________________-___-_-_____-----_-_- 1^ Quaternary system.____-__-______________-_------__----_-- 18 Structure.---.____________--_____,__.....___---__----__----_-- 19 History._________________________________---________---_--- 20 Water resources._-__-_-__-_---__---_______________-___---___----_- 21 Hydrologic cycle. ____-________-__________--____--__-_--------- 21 Surface water.________________________________________________ 21 Ground water_________________________________________________ 21 Source of ground water______________________________---_--- 21 Occurrence.________--_______________----_----__----_----- 22 Porosity of aquifer_______________-__---_----__--_-----_ 22 Permeability of aquifer________________--_____-_-------- 23 Artesian versus water-table conditions____________________ 23 Openings in consolidated rocks________-_-______---_----- 24 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones._____________--- 24 Chattanooga shale._______________-___-_---_------- 25 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert ---------- 25 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones-______________---_- 26 Openings in unconsolidated sediments._____________---__- 26 in IV CONTENTS Water resources Continued Ground water Continued Page Recharge. ________________________________________________ 26 Precipitation__ ________________________________________ 26 Stream losses--________-__________----_-________-_____ 27 Interformational leakage____________----____---__-_____ 27 Consolidated rocks_________________---_-____---________ 29 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones.________________ 29 Chattanooga shale__-_--___-_-----------------_--_- 31 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert__________ 31 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones._-_-____-__-_______ 32 Mantle rock__________________________________________ 32 Movement..._____________________________________________ 33 Movement in consolidated rocks--__--__-_-_--------____- 33 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones_________________ 33 Chattanooga shale.________________________________ 34 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert-_________ 34 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones.___________________ 35 Movement in mantle rock______________________________ 35 Discharge ______-_--___-______________-________-_-_----___ 36 Springs______________ _________________________________ 36 Evapotranspiration. ___________________________________ 37 Wells._______________________________________________ 37 Consolidated rocks___________________________________ 37 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones.________________ 37 Chattanooga shale______________---______-___-----_ 38 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert__________ 38 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones_______________ ____ 39 Mantle rock__________________________________________ 39 Availability of ground water________________________________ 40 Availability of ground water from consolidated rocks_______ 40 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones-_______________ 40 Chattanooga shale______________-___-____---------_ 41 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert __________ 41 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones,___________________ 41 Availability of ground water from mantle rock ____________ 42 Use of ground water_______________________________________ 42 Springs_ _ ___________________________________________ 42 Wells. _______________________________________________ 43 Chemical quality of ground water___________________________ 44 Methods of expressing analyses____-____-____-_------__-_ 46 Parts per million__________________________________ 46 Equivalents per million_______________-_-__---_-__ 47 Characteristics of ground water _________________________ 47 Types of ground water in the Scottsville area_____________ 48 Louisville and Sellersburg limestones.________________ 49 Chattanooga shale.________________________________ 50 New Providence shale and Fort Payne chert---.------ 50 Warsaw and St. Louis limestones-___________________ 51 Mantle rock.____'__-______________________________ 51 History of water development_______________________-------_ 51 Scottsville water supply._______________________-------_ 51 Rural use of water_______________-_____________------ 52 CONTENTS V Water resources Continued Ground water Continued Page Fluctuations of water level_____-_-____________--_--_--______ 52 Response to atmospheric-pressure changes________________ 52 Response to rainfall__________________________________ 53 Long-term trends__-_-_-________-__-___--------_--___-- 54 Potential development of ground-water supplies-_--___________ 58 Future investigations______________________________________ 65 Summary. ________________________________________________________ 65 Selected bibliography______________________________________________ 67 Records of wells, springs, and measured sections-______________________ 69 Index-___________________________________________________________ 331 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] PLATE 1. Generalized geologic map showing structure contours on top of Chattanooga shale and stratigraphic section of the Scottsville area, Kentucky. 2. Map of Scottsville area, Kentucky, showing location of wells and springs. 3. Map of Scottsville area, Kentucky, showing chemical analyses and sources of water. Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Kentucky showing progress of ground-water investigations. ________________________________________ 3 2. Sketch showing system used for numbering wells and springs. 5 3. Graphs showing annual precipitation at Bowling Green_ _ _ _ _ 7 4. Graphs showing monthly temperature and precipitation at Bowling Green_______________________________________ 8 5. Graph showing relation of water level in well to gage height of nearby stream,____________________________________ 28 6. Diagram showing possible movement of water from one valley to another under an intervening ridge_____________ 30 7. Diagram illustrating the modes of occurrence of ground water in the Fort Pa'yne chert________________-_---_----_---- 35 8. Hydrographs of tests on well 8610-3640-253-______________ 43 9. Graphs showing wells subdivided by depth and type and by aquifer.._____________________________--_-_----_-_-_- 45 10. Graphs showing wells subdivided by type of power and use_ _ _. 45 11. Graph showing effect of atmospheric pressure on water levels. _ 53 12. Fluctuations of water level in observation wells 8605-3640-60 and 8605-3635-81 in the Fort Payne chert and semimonthly precipitation, 1950-53___________-__-__-----_---------- 55 13. Fluctuations of water level in observation wells 8605-3640-37, 8610-3640-230, and 8610-3645-50 in the Fort Payne chert and semimonthly precipitation, 1950-53-_____________ 56 14. Fluctuations of water level in observation wells 8610-3640-5, 8610-3640-37, and 8610-3640-115 in the Fort Payne chert and semimonthly precipitation, 1950-53-_ _______-_--_-- 57 VI CONTENTS Page FIGURE 15. Fluctuations of water level in observation well 8605-3640-85 in the Fort Payne chert and semimonthly precipitation, 1950-53______...._.._____._.._.____.___.___.._______ 58 16. Fluctuations of water level in observation wells in the mantle, Louisville limestone, and Fort Payne chert and semi­ monthly precipitation, 1950-53_ _ _____________________ 59 17. Fluctuations of water level in observation wells 8605-3640-2, and 8610-3645-46 in the Warsaw
Recommended publications
  • B2150-B FRONT Final
    Bedrock Geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri By W. John Nelson THE PADUCAH CUSMAP QUADRANGLE: RESOURCE AND TOPICAL INVESTIGATIONS Martin B. Goldhaber, Project Coordinator T OF EN TH TM E U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2150–B R I A N P T E E R D . I O S . R A joint study conducted in collaboration with the Illinois State Geological U Survey, the Indiana Geological Survey, the Kentucky Geological Survey, and the Missouri M 9 Division of Geology and Land Survey A 8 4 R C H 3, 1 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mark Schaefer, Acting Director For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nelson, W. John Bedrock geology of the Paducah 1°×2° CUSMAP Quadrangle, Illinois, Indiana, Ken- tucky, and Missouri / by W. John Nelson. p. cm.—(U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2150–B) (The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs. no. : I 19.3:2150–B 1. Geology—Middle West. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: The Paducah CUSMAP Quadrangle, resource and topical investigations ; B QE75.B9 no. 2150–B [QE78.7] [557.3 s—dc21 97–7724 [557.7] CIP CONTENTS Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ordovician, Silurian, and Middle Devonian Stratigraphy in Northwestern Kentucky and Southern Indiana-Some Reinterpretations
    MISCELLANEOUS REPORT NO. 6 ORDOVICIAN, SILURIAN, AND MIDDLE DEVONIAN STRATIGRAPHY IN NORTHWESTERN KENTUCKY AND SOUTHERN INDIANA-SOME REINTERPRETATIONS by James E. Conkin, Barbara M. Conkin, and John Kubacko, Jr. .. • ' .•·"· DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 4383 FOUNTAIN SQUARE DRIVE COLUMBUS, OHIO 43224-1362 (614) 265-6576 (Voice) (614) 265-6994 {TDD) (614) 447-1918 (FAX) OHIO GEOLOGY ADVISORY COUNCIL Dr. E. Scott Bair, representing Hydrogeology Mr. Mark R. Rowland, representing Environmental Geology Dr. J. Barry Maynard, representing At-Large Citizens Dr. Lon C. Ruedisili, representing Higher Education Mr. Michael T. Puskarich, representing Coal Mr. Gary W. Sitler, representing Oil and Gas Mr. Robert A. Wilkinson, representing Industrial Minerals SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ADMINISTRATION (614) 265-6576 Thomas M. Berg, MS, State Geologist and Division Chief Robert G. Van Hom, MS, Assistant State Geologist and Assistant Division Chief Michael C. Hansen, PhD, Senior Geologist, Ohio Geology Editor, and Geohazards Officer James M . Miller, BA, Fiscal Officer Sharon L. Stone, AD, Executive Secretary REGIONAL GEOLOGY SECTION (614) 265-6597 TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS SECTION (614) 265-6593 Dennis N. Hull, MS, Geologist Manager and Section Head Merrianne Hackathorn, MS, Geologist and Editor Jean M. Lesher, Typesetting and Printing Technician Paleozoic Geology and Mapping Subsection (614) 265-6473 Edward V. Kuehnle, BA, Cartographer Edward Mac Swinford, MS, Geologist Supervisor Michael R. Lester, BS, Cartographer Glenn E. Larsen, MS, Geologist Robert L. Stewart, Cartographer Gregory A. Schumacher, MS, Geologist Lisa Van Doren, BA, Cartographer Douglas L. Shrake, MS, Geologist Ernie R. Slucher, MS, Geologist PUBLICATIONS CENTER (614) 265-6605 Quaternary Geology and Mapping Subsection (614) 265-6599 Garry E.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Western Kentucky Fluorspar District
    Stratigraphy and Structure of the Western Kentucky Fluorspar District GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER Prepared tn cooperation with the Geological Surrey Stratigraphy and Structure of the Western Kentucky Fluorspar District 53? Robert D. Trace and Dewey H. Amos CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1151-D Prepared in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey Mississippian and Pennsylvanian limestone and clastic rocks are exposed in northeast- trending horsts and grab ens UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, W ASH I NGT O N : 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Trace, Robert Denny, 1917- Stratigraphy and structure of the western Kentucky fluorspar district. (Contributions to the geology of Kentucky) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1151-D) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1151-D 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Mississippian. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic Pennsylvanian. 3. Geology Kentucky. I. Amos, Dewey Harold, 1925- joint author. II. Kentucky. Geological Survey. III. Title. IV. Series. V. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1151-D. QE672.T7 551.7'009769 80-607000 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ————————————— Dl Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction ——————————— 2 Pennsylvanian System—Continued Production ——————————— 3 Morrowan Provincial Series—Continued History of previous geologic work • 4 Caseyville Formation—Continued Stratigraphy — 5 Caseyville Formation, undivided, along eastern Mississippian System —— 5 margin of district ——————— ———— D22 Osagean Provincial Series——————— 5 Sequence between the Pounds Sandstone Fort Payne Formation——————— 5 Member of the Caseyville Formation and Meramecian Provincial Series ———— 7 the Grindstaff Sandstone Member of the Trade- Warsaw-Salem-St.
    [Show full text]
  • Waulsortian Mounds and Reservoir Potential of the Ullin Limestone ("Warsaw") in Southern Illinois and Adjacent Areas in Kentucky
    557 IL6gu Survey no. 25 Waulsortian Mounds and Reservoir Potential of the Ullin Limestone ("Warsaw") in Southern Illinois and Adjacent Areas in Kentucky Zakaria Lasemi, Janis D. Treworgy, Rodney D. Norby, John P. Grube, and Bryan G. Huff Geologic Field Trip, April 19, 1994 Sponsored by the Illinois Geological Society and the Illinois State Geological Survey Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://archive.org/details/waulsortianmound25lase Waulsortian Mounds and Reservoir Potential of the Ullin Limestone ("Warsaw") in Southern Illinois and Adjacent Areas in Kentucky Zakaria Lasemi, Janis D. Treworgy, Rodney D. Norby, John P. Grube, and Bryan G. Huff Contributors Garland R. Dever, Jr. Kentucky Geological Survey Terry Teitloff Vulcan Materials Company, Kentucky Richard D. Harvey Illinois State Geological Survey Guidebook 25 Geologic Field Trip, April 19, 1994 Sponsored by the Illinois Geological Society and the Illinois State Geological Survey Illinois Department of Energy and Natural Resources ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Morris W. Leighton, Chief Natural Resources Building 615 East Peabody Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820-6964 Phone 217/333-4747 Fax 217/333-2830 Printed by authority of the State of Illinois / 1994 / 1000 printed on recycled paper using soybean ink . 5 CONTENTS ULLIN LIMESTONE ("WARSAW") AND FORT PAYNE FORMATION: OVERVIEW AND STOP DESCRIPTIONS Zakaria Lasemi, Janis D. Treworgy, Rodney D. Norby, John P. Grube, and Bryan G. Huff 1 OVERVIEW 1 Carbonate Rock Classification 5 Depositional Model 5 Hydrocarbon Potential 6 Overview of Stops 8 1 Reed quarry 8 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Outcrop Features of the Mansfield Formation in Southwestern Indiana
    OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA by Henry H. Gray Indiana Department of Conservation GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Report of Progress No. 26 1962 STATE OF INDIANA Matthew E. Welsh, Governor DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Donald E. Foltz, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY John B. Patton, State Geologist Bloomington ______________________________________ Report of Progress No. 26 _____________________________________________________ OUTCROP FEATURES OF THE MANSFIELD FORMATION IN SOUTHWESTERN INDIANA by Henry H. Gray Printed by authority of the State of Indiana BLOOMINGTON, INDIANA November 1962 ____________________________________________________________________ For sale by Geological Survey, Indiana Department of Conservation, Bloomington, Ind. Price 25 cents SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL STAFF OF THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY JOHN B. PATTON, State Geologist MAURICE E. BIGGS, Assistant State Geologist DUNCAN J. McGREGOR, Geologist MARY BETH FOX, Mineral Statistician COAL SECTION GEOPHYSICS SECTION CHARLES E. WIER, Geologist and Head MAURICE E. BIGGS, Geophysicist and Head S. A. FRIEDMAN, Geologist ROBERT F. BLAKELY, Geophysicist HAROLD C. HUTCHISON, Geologist CHARLES S. MILLER, Instrument Maker HOWARD W. LEE, Paleobotanist ALBERT J. RUDMAN, Geophysicist RICHARD L. POWELL, Geologist JOSEPH F. WHALEY, Geophysicist WILLIAM C. RICHARDSON, Geological Assistant GLEN L. WORKMAN, Driller WAYNE COX, Assistant Driller ARTHUR WAYNE AYNES, Geophysical Assistant DRAFTING AND PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION WILLIAM H. MORAN, Chief Draftsman ROBERT E. JUDAH, Geological Artist-Draftsman INDUSTRIAL MINERALS SECTION MICKY P. LOVE, Geological Draftsman JOHN E. PEACE, Senior Geological Draftsman LAWRENCE F. ROONEY, Geologist and Head GEORGE R. RINGER, Photographer NED M. SMITH, Geologist JACK A. SUNDERMAN, Geologist EDUCATIONAL SERVICES R. DEE RARICK, Geologist and Head PETROLEUM SECTION T. A. DAWSON, Geologist and Head GEOCHEMISTRY SECTION LEROY E. BECKER, Geologist G. L.
    [Show full text]
  • Storage, Retrieval, and Analysis of Compacted Shale Data
    14 Storage, Retrieval, and Analysis of Compacted Shale Data Dirk J. A. van Zyl, L.E. Wood, and C. W. Lovell, Department of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana W. J. Sisiliano, Indiana State Highway Commission La1ge amounts of soil test data aro beir,g gonoroted by states testing materials fr-om three Joint Highway Research Project (J.HRP) reports for new highway facillties. Of particular Interest to ,omo states Is tho occur­ completed at Purdue University @, !, ID. A complete rence of shale os a highway motorlal. This paper describes a storage and rotrioval system for compacted lndlnnn shale data (163 setsl. Statistical analyses in ­ summary of all the data available and descriptions of the cluded frequency analysis, bivariate correlation analysis, nnd multiple rogres, geology of Indiana shales and the physiography of Indiana sion analysis. Histograms of the frequency distributions and o summary table are given by van Zyl (§). The table below gives a summary of all the dlfferont statistical descriptors of the parameters are given. Bivariate of the data sets according to geological description. correlation analysis (ono•to-one torrolations) was done for all dota lumped and for data grouped by geologic unit. The multiple regression, concentrated on five-parameter models for predicting Califomla bearing rotio values. It was Geological No. of also found by multlple tllgrenion that the various value, of sloko durabilily in­ System Geological Stage Data Sets dices can be estimated by using second•ordor equotions. The analyses aro of potontia! value to practicing engineers as a first approximation in design and Pennsylvanian Shelburn formation 3 moy prove useful to engineers rosoarching compacted shale behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Linkchapter
    Index [Italic page numbers indicate major references] Abbott Formation, Illinois, 251 Michigan, 287 beetle borrows, Nebraska, 11 Acadian belt, 429 Archean rocks beetles, Manitoba, 45 Acadian orogeny Michigan, 273, 275 Belfast Member, Brassfield Illinois, 243 Minnesota, 47, 49, 53 Formation, Ohio, 420, 421 Indiana, 359 Wisconsin, 189 Bellepoint Member, Columbus Acrophyllum oneidaense, 287 Arikaree Group, Nebraska, 13, 14, Limestone, Ohio, 396 Adams County, Ohio, 420, 431 15, 25, 28 Belleview Valley, Missouri, 160 Adams County, Wisconsin, 183 Arikareean age, Nebraska, 3 Bellevue Limestone, Indiana, 366, Admire Group, Nebraska, 37 arthropods 367 Aglaspis, 83 Iowa, 83 Bennett Member, Red Eagle Ainsworth Table, Nebraska, 5 Missouri, 137 Formation, Nebraska, 37 Alexander County, Illinois, 247, 257 Ash Hollow Creek, Nebraska, 31 Benton County, Indiana, 344 algae Ash Hollow Formation, Nebraska, 1, Benzie County, Michigan, 303 Indian, 333 2, 5, 26, 29 Berea Sandstone, Ohio, 404, 405, Michigan, 282 Ash Hollow State Historical Park, 406, 427, 428 Missouri, 137 Nebraska, 29 Berne Conglomerate, Logan Ohio, 428 asphalt, Illinois, 211 Formation, Ohio, 411, 412, 413 Alger County, Michigan, 277 Asphalting, 246 Bethany Falls Limestone Member, Algonquin age, Michigan, 286, 287 Asterobillingsa, 114 Swope Formation, Missouri, Allamakee County, Iowa, 81, 83, 84 Astrohippus, 26 135, 138 Allegheny Group, Ohio, 407 Atherton Formation, Indiana, 352 Bethany Falls Limestone, Iowa, 123 Allen County, Indiana, 328, 329, 330 athyrids, Iowa, 111 Betula, 401 Allensville
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Borden Formation (Mississippian) in North-Central Kentucky
    Members of the Borden Formation (Mississippian) In North-Central Kentucky By ROY C. KEPFERLE CONTRIBUTIONS TO STRATIGRAPHY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1354-B Work done in cooperation with the Kentucky Geological Survey A redefinition of the Holts claw Siltstone Member and a review of the stratigraphic relations brought out by geologic mapping UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 73-176231 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 15 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1223 CONTENTS Page Abstract ....... .................................................................................................... Bl Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Previous nomenclature ..................................................................................... 3 Borden Group ........................................................................................... 3 New Providence Formation and Kenwood Sandstone .............. 3 Rosewood, Holtsclaw, Locust Point, Carwood, and Brodhead Formations ..................................................................................... 5 Floyds Knob Formation ................................................................. 6 Muldraugh Formation ....................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Kentucky Shales
    Research Report UKTRP-81-16 IDENTIFICATION OF KENTUCKY SHALES by Tommy C. Hopkins Research Engineer Chief and Brian C. Gilpin Geologist Kentucky Transportation Research Program College of Engineering University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky in cooperation with Department of Transportation Commonwealth of Kentucky and Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Kentucky Department of Transportation, of the Federal Highway Administration nor of the University of Kentucky. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. August 1981 Technical Report Documentation Page Report No. Government Accession No, Recipient's Catolog No. 1. 2. 3. Title and Subtitle Report Date 4. 5. August 1981 Identification of Kentucky Shales 6. Performing Organization Code Performing Organization Report No. 8. Author's) 7. UKTRP-81-16 Tommy c. Hopkins and Brian C. Gilpin Performing Organization Name and Address Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 9. 10. Kentucky Transportation Research Program College of Engineering Contract or Gront No. 11. University of Kentucky KYP-76-79; KYHPR-82-91 Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0043 13. Type of Report and Period Cove.red 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Interim Report Kentucky Department of Transportation State Office Building Sponsoring Agency Code Frankfort, Kentucky 40622 14. Supplementary Notes 15. Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration Study Title: Engineering Properties and Uses of Kentucky Shales Abstract 16. Results obtained from a series of engineering tests performed on 40 different types of shales are summarized and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithostratigraphy of Precambrian and Paleozoic Rocks Along Structural Cross Section KY-1, Crittenden County to Lincoln County, Kentucky
    Kentucky Geological Survey James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director University of Kentucky, Lexington Lithostratigraphy of Precambrian and Paleozoic Rocks along Structural Cross Section KY-1, Crittenden County to Lincoln County, Kentucky � ������������ � �� �� �� �������������� ������������ ������� ������������ ������������ �������� ������������� � �� �� � � � � � � � � � ������������ � ������������ ����� ���� � � � � � ����� � � � � ��� � � � �������� �������� �������������� ������������ � �� �� ����� ��������� � �� ����� Martin C. Noger and James A. Drahovzal Report of Investigations 13 Series XII, 2005 Kentucky Geological Survey James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director University of Kentucky, Lexington Lithostratigraphy of Precambrian and Paleozoic Rocks along Structural Cross Section KY-1, Crittenden County to Lincoln County, Kentucky Martin C. Noger and James A. Drahovzal Report of Investigations 13 Series XII, 2005 © 2005 University of Kentucky For further information contact: Technology Transfer Offi cer Kentucky Geological Survey 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0107 ISSN 0075-5591 Technical Level General Intermediate Technical Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................2 Sequences ........................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Miospore Biostratigraphy, Sequence Stratigraphy, and Glacio-Eustatic Response of the Borden Delta (Osagean; Tournaisian-Visean) of Kentucky and Indiana, U.S.A
    MIOSPORE BIOSTRATIGRAPHY, SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY, AND GLACIO-EUSTATIC RESPONSE OF THE BORDEN DELTA (OSAGEAN; TOURNAISIAN-VISEAN) OF KENTUCKY AND INDIANA, U.S.A. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffery G. Richardson, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor W. I. Ausich, Adviser Professor L. A. Krissek ________________________ Professor D. E. Pride Adviser Department of Geological Sciences Professor M. R. Saltzman ABSTRACT The Borden Delta (Osagean; Tournaisian-Visean) represents a classic siliciclastic basin filling succession. Historically, the Borden Delta was thought to be deposited in response to tectonic activity centered around a peripheral bulge associated with the newly formed Acadian Highlands in the east. As the highlands eroded, the sediments were transported and deposited in the basin. This report proposes that the sea level fluctuations recorded in the Borden Delta rocks were formed in response to Gondwanan glaciations. Lithologic data from South America and chemostratigraphic data from numerous localities globally support this idea. The rocks in the study area were subdivided into three Primary Depositional Centers (PDC-I, II, III) based on lithologic and stratigraphic characteristics. The rocks in PDC-I (northeastern Kentucky) were deposited during the lowstand systems tract and the transgressive systems tract of the Vanceburg Sequence. Palynologically, the rocks in PDC-I belong to the PC Biozone of Higgs et al. (1988). The rocks in PDC-II (south-central Kentucky) represent parts of two different third order sequences (Vanceburg and Cumberland Sequences). In the eastern part of PDC-II, the Borden succession is represented only by the Nancy Member.
    [Show full text]
  • Additives to Control Slaking in Compacted Shales
    SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING JOINT HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROJECT FHWA/IN/JHRP-80/6 ADDITIVES TO CONTROL SLAKING IN COMPACTED SHALES M. Surendra a&n PURDUE UNIVERSITY MDIANA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION 26 -Co Interim Report ADDITIVES TO CONTROL SLAKING IN COMPACTED SHALES TO: H. L. Michael, Director May 14, 1980 Joint Highway Research Project Project: C-36-5L FROM: C. W. Lovell, Research Engineer Joint Highway Research Project File: 6-6-12 Attached is an Interim Report on the HPR Part II Study titled "Design and Construction Guidelines for Shale Embankments". This is Interim Report No. 8 and is entitled "Additives to Control Slaking in Compacted Shales". It is authored by M. Surendra of our staff. The research determined the effects of various salts and of lime on the durability of several Indiana shales. A number of the salts signifi- cantly changed the slake durability of some shales. Lime consistently improved the durability of tested shales. The Report is submitted for review, comment and acceptance as partial fulfillment of the objectives of the referenced HPR study. Respectfully submitted, C. W. Lovell Research Engineer CWL:ms cc: A. G. Altschaeffl D. E. Hancher C. F. Scholer W. L. Dolch K. R. Hoover K. C. Sinha R. L. Eskew J. F. McLaughlin C. A. Venable G. D. Gibson R. D. Miles H. P. Wehrenberg W. H. Goetz P. L. Owens L. E. Wood M. J. Gutzwiller G. T. Satterly E. J. Yoder G. K. Hallock S. R. Yoder Interim Report ADDITIVES TO CONTROL SLAKING IN COMPACTED SHALES by Mariappa Surendra Graduate Instructor in Research Joint Highway Research Project Project No.
    [Show full text]