DOCSLIB.ORG

Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subsurface Facies Analysis of the Devonian Berea Sandstone in Southeastern Ohio SUBSURFACE FACIES ANALYSIS OF THE DEVONIAN BEREA SANDSTONE IN SOUTHEASTERN OHIO William T. Garnes A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2014 Committee: James Evans, Advisor Jeffrey Snyder Charles Onasch ii ABSTRACT James Evans, Advisor The Devonian Berea Sandstone is an internally complex, heterogeneous unit that appears prominently both in outcrop and subsurface in Ohio. While the unit is clearly deltaic in outcrops in northeastern Ohio, its depositional setting is more problematic in southeastern Ohio where it is only found in the subsurface. The goal of this project was to search for evidence of a barrier island/inlet channel depositional environment for the Berea Sandstone to assess whether the Berea Sandstone was deposited under conditions in southeastern Ohio unique from northeastern Ohio. This project involved looking at cores from 5 wells: 3426 (Athens Co.), 3425 (Meigs Co.), 3253 (Athens Co.), 3252 (Athens Co.), and 3251 (Athens Co.) In cores, the Berea Sandstone ranges from 2 to 10 m (8-32 ft) thick, with an average thickness of 6.3 m (20.7 ft). Core descriptions involved hand specimens, thin section descriptions, and core photography. In addition to these 5 wells, the gamma ray logs from 13 wells were used to interpret the architecture and lithologies of the Berea Sandstone in Athens Co. and Meigs Co. as well as surrounding Vinton, Washington, and Morgan counties. Analysis from this study shows evidence of deltaic lobe progradation, abandonment, and re-working. Evidence of interdistributary bays with shallow sub-tidal environments, as well as large sand bodies, is also present. A prominent sequence of climbing ripples ≤ 6 cm give evidence for distributary mouth bars. Frequently appearing massive bedding, sparse bioturbation, and a sequence of massive bedding to planar lamination overlying convoluted bedding provides evidence that high sedimentation rates were common during the deposition of the Berea Sandstone. Turbulent debris flows are interpreted based on the presence of a 10 cm iii incomplete turbidite lithofacies assemblage. Tidal processes can be inferred from tidal rhythmite sequences approximately 5 m thick, and clear storm activity is apparent from the presence of a 16 cm tempestite lithofacies assemblage. Geophysical log analysis allowed for the interpretation of the subsurface architecture of the formation. Combined, these features provide strong evidence for the interpretation that, in southeastern Ohio, the Berea Sandstone was deposited in a tidally-influenced, deltaic environment. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would first like to thank the Graduate College, and entire Geology Department of Bowling Green State University. I am greatly indebted to Dr. James E. Evans for his candid honesty, advice, and constant support throughout my time at Bowling Green State University. I would also like to express my gratitude to the Ohio Geological Survey, specifically Mr. Greg Schumacher, Mr. Aaron Evelsizor, Ms. Madge Fitak, and Mr. Mark Baranoski for the help with collecting core and geophysical log data. I’m obliged to thank Mr. Michael J. Carroll and the National Association of Black Geoscientists for giving me an opportunity to present my thesis proposal, and reinvigorating my passion for the geosciences. To my Alpha Phi Alpha fraternity brothers Jeremy Stewart, Titus Austin, Malcom McIver, Bernard White, and my best friend Aaron Ruth I am indebted for their constant financial, spiritual, and emotional support. Of course I must graciously thank my parents Harold and Sharon Garnes for their constant love and encouragement. I’m grateful to my brothers Harold and Randolph for providing me with a car, my cousin Frank Sawyer for always being there to help, my girlfriend Ashley for all her love and support, and my uncles Thomas Sawyer and Craig Sawyer and aunts Neida Sawyer and Allison Currie for taking such an interest in my future. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1 Deltaic Environments........................................................................................................ 1 Subaerial Delta Plains ........................................................................................... 1 Interdistributary Bays............................................................................................ 2 Delta Front ............................................................................................................ 5 Prodelta ................................................................................................................. 6 Barrier Island Complexes ................................................................................................. 7 Beach Zonation ..................................................................................................... 9 Barrier Islands ..................................................................................................... 11 Estuaries .............................................................................................................. 14 Lagoons ............................................................................................................... 15 Tidal Inlets .......................................................................................................... 17 Purpose and Goals........................................................................................................... 18 GEOLOGIC BACKGROUND ................................................................................................... 20 Regional Geologic Setting .............................................................................................. 20 vi Regional Stratigraphy ..................................................................................................... 20 Pre-Cambrian ...................................................................................................... 20 Cambrian ............................................................................................................. 22 Ordovician........................................................................................................... 22 Silurian ................................................................................................................ 23 Devonian ............................................................................................................ 23 Berea Sandstone .............................................................................................................. 24 Lithology ............................................................................................................. 27 Stratigraphy & Age ............................................................................................. 28 Geologic History ................................................................................................. 30 Economic Geology.............................................................................................. 31 METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 34 Drill Core ........................................................................................................................ 34 Core Analysis ...................................................................................................... 34 Geophysical Log Analysis .............................................................................................. 35 Gamma-ray logs .................................................................................................. 37 Structure Contour Maps ...................................................................................... 37 vii Isopach Maps ...................................................................................................... 38 Outcrop Analysis ............................................................................................................ 38 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 42 Core Descriptions............................................................................................................ 42 Core 3426 ............................................................................................................ 42 Core 3425 ............................................................................................................ 44 Core 3253 ............................................................................................................ 46 Core 3252 ............................................................................................................ 46 Core 3251 ............................................................................................................ 49 Lithology and Thin Section Analysis ............................................................................. 51 Sandstone ............................................................................................................ 51 Siltstone............................................................................................................... 53 Mudstone............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FISHING for DUNKLEOSTEUS You’Re Definitely Gonna Need a Bigger Boat by Mark Peter
    OOhhiioo GGeeoollooggyy EEXXTTRRAA July 31, 2019 FISHING FOR DUNKLEOSTEUS You’re definitely gonna need a bigger boat by Mark Peter At an estimated maximum length of 6 to 8.8 meters (20–29 sediments that eroded from the Acadian Mountains, combined feet), Dunkleosteus terrelli (Fig. 1) would have been a match for with abundant organic matter from newly evolved land plants even the Hollywood-sized great white shark from the and marine plankton, settled in the basin as dark organic movie Jaws. Surfers, scuba divers, and swimmers can relax, muds. Over millions of years, accumulation of additional however, because Dunkleosteus has been extinct for nearly 360 overlying sediments compacted the muds into black shale rock. million years. Dunkleosteus was a placoderm, a type of armored The rocks that formed from the Late Devonian seafloor fish, that lived during the Late Devonian Period from about sediments (along with fossils of Dunkleosteus) arrived at their 375–359 million years ago. Fossil remains of the large present location of 41 degrees north latitude after several species Dunkleosteus terrelli are present in the Cleveland hundred million years of slow plate tectonic movement as the Member of the Ohio Shale, which contains rocks that are North American Plate moved northward. approximately 360–359 million years old. Figure 1. A reconstruction of a fully-grown Dunkleosteus terrelli, assuming a length of 29 feet, with angler for scale. Modified from illustration by Hugo Salais of Metazoa Studio. Dunkleosteus cruised Late Devonian seas and oceans as an Figure 2. Paleogeographic reconstruction of eastern North America during apex predator, much like the great white shark of today.
    [Show full text]
  • CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY and ... -.: Palaeontologia Polonica
    CONODONT BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE PERTH LIMESTONE MEMBER, STAUNTON FORMATION (PENNSYLVANIAN) OF THE ILLINOIS BASIN, U.S.A. CARl B. REXROAD. lEWIS M. BROWN. JOE DEVERA. and REBECCA J. SUMAN Rexroad , c.. Brown . L.. Devera, 1.. and Suman, R. 1998. Conodont biostrati graph y and paleoec ology of the Perth Limestone Member. Staunt on Form ation (Pennsy lvanian) of the Illinois Basin. U.S.A. Ill: H. Szaniawski (ed .), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conodont Symposium (ECOS VI). - Palaeont ologia Polonica, 58 . 247-259. Th e Perth Limestone Member of the Staunton Formation in the southeastern part of the Illinois Basin co nsists ofargill aceous limestone s that are in a facies relati on ship with shales and sandstones that commonly are ca lcareous and fossiliferous. Th e Perth conodo nts are do minated by Idiognathodus incurvus. Hindeodus minutus and Neognathodu s bothrops eac h comprises slightly less than 10% of the fauna. Th e other spec ies are minor consti­ tuents. The Perth is ass igned to the Neog nathodus bothrops- N. bassleri Sub zon e of the N. bothrops Zo ne. but we were unable to co nfirm its assignment to earliest Desmoin esian as oppose d to latest Atokan. Co nodo nt biofacies associations of the Perth refle ct a shallow near- shore marine environment of generally low to moderate energy. but locali zed areas are more variable. particul ar ly in regard to salinity. K e y w o r d s : Co nodo nta. biozonation. paleoecology. Desmoinesian , Penn sylvanian. Illinois Basin. U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambrian Ordovician
    Open File Report LXXVI the shale is also variously colored. Glauconite is generally abundant in the formation. The Eau Claire A Summary of the Stratigraphy of the increases in thickness southward in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan where it becomes much more Southern Peninsula of Michigan * dolomitic. by: The Dresbach sandstone is a fine to medium grained E. J. Baltrusaites, C. K. Clark, G. V. Cohee, R. P. Grant sandstone with well rounded and angular quartz grains. W. A. Kelly, K. K. Landes, G. D. Lindberg and R. B. Thin beds of argillaceous dolomite may occur locally in Newcombe of the Michigan Geological Society * the sandstone. It is about 100 feet thick in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan but is absent in Northern Indiana. The Franconia sandstone is a fine to medium grained Cambrian glauconitic and dolomitic sandstone. It is from 10 to 20 Cambrian rocks in the Southern Peninsula of Michigan feet thick where present in the Southern Peninsula. consist of sandstone, dolomite, and some shale. These * See last page rocks, Lake Superior sandstone, which are of Upper Cambrian age overlie pre-Cambrian rocks and are The Trempealeau is predominantly a buff to light brown divided into the Jacobsville sandstone overlain by the dolomite with a minor amount of sandy, glauconitic Munising. The Munising sandstone at the north is dolomite and dolomitic shale in the basal part. Zones of divided southward into the following formations in sandy dolomite are in the Trempealeau in addition to the ascending order: Mount Simon, Eau Claire, Dresbach basal part. A small amount of chert may be found in and Franconia sandstones overlain by the Trampealeau various places in the formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Succession in Lower Peninsula of Michigan
    STRATIGRAPHIC DOMINANT LITHOLOGY ERA PERIOD EPOCHNORTHSTAGES AMERICANBasin Margin Basin Center MEMBER FORMATIONGROUP SUCCESSION IN LOWER Quaternary Pleistocene Glacial Drift PENINSULA Cenozoic Pleistocene OF MICHIGAN Mesozoic Jurassic ?Kimmeridgian? Ionia Sandstone Late Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Conemaugh Grand River Formation Geological Survey Division Late Harold Fitch, State Geologist Pennsylvanian and Saginaw Formation ?Pottsville? Michigan Basin Geological Society Early GEOL IN OG S IC A A B L N Parma Sandstone S A O G C I I H E C T I Y Bayport Limestone M Meramecian Grand Rapids Group 1936 Late Michigan Formation Stratigraphic Nomenclature Project Committee: Mississippian Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos, Co-chairman Mark S. Wollensak, Co-chairman Osagian Marshall Sandstone Principal Authors: Dr. Paul A. Catacosinos Early Kinderhookian Coldwater Shale Dr. William Harrison III Robert Reynolds Sunbury Shale Dr. Dave B.Westjohn Mark S. Wollensak Berea Sandstone Chautauquan Bedford Shale 2000 Late Antrim Shale Senecan Traverse Formation Traverse Limestone Traverse Group Erian Devonian Bell Shale Dundee Limestone Middle Lucas Formation Detroit River Group Amherstburg Form. Ulsterian Sylvania Sandstone Bois Blanc Formation Garden Island Formation Early Bass Islands Dolomite Sand Salina G Unit Paleozoic Glacial Clay or Silt Late Cayugan Salina F Unit Till/Gravel Salina E Unit Salina D Unit Limestone Salina C Shale Salina Group Salina B Unit Sandy Limestone Salina A-2 Carbonate Silurian Salina A-2 Evaporite Shaley Limestone Ruff Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Investigations in Ohio
    INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 By Carolyn Farnsworth STATE OF OHIO C. William O'Neill, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A. W. Marion, Director NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION Milton Ronsheim, Chairman John A. Slipher, Bryce Browning, Vice Chairman Secretary C. D. Blubaugh Dean L. L. Rummell Forrest G. Hall Dr. Myron T. Sturgeon A. W. Marion George Wenger DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Ralph J. Bernhagen, Chief STATI OF OHIO DIPAlTMIMT 011 NATUlAL llSOUlCH DIVISION OF &EOLO&ICAL SURVEY INFORMATION CIRCULAR NO. 21 'GEOLOG·ICAL INVESTIGATIONS IN OHIO 1956 by CAROLYN FARNSWORTH COLUMBUS 1957 Blank Page CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Project listing by author 2 Project listing by subject . 22 Economic geology 22 Aggregates . 22 Coal . • 22 Ground water 22 Iron .. 22 Oil and gas 22 Salt . 22 Sand and gravel 23 General .. 23 Geomorphology 23 Geophysics 23 Glacial geology 23 Mineralogy and petrology . 24 Clay .. 24 Coal . 24 Dolomite 24 Limestone. 24 Sandstone •• 24 Shale. 24 Till 25 Others 25 Paleontology. 25 Stratigraphy and sedimentation 26 Structural geology . 27 Miscellaneous . 27 Geographic distribution. 27 Statewide 27 Areal. \\ 28 County 29 Miscellaneous . 33 iii Blank Page I INTRODUCTION In September 1956, letters of inquiry and questionnaires were sent to all Ohio geologists on the mailing list of the Ohio Geological Survey, and to other persons who might be working on geological problems in Ohio. This publication has been compiled from the information contained on the returned forms. In most eases it is assumed that the projects listed herein will culminate in reports which will be available to the profession through scientific journals, government publications, or grad- uate school theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Geology of Northeastern Ohio
    SDMS US EPA REGION V -1 SOME IMAGES WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE ILLEGIBLE DUE TO BAD SOURCE DOCUMENTS. GUIDE TO THE GEOLOGY of NORTHEASTERN OHIO Edited by P. O. BANKS & RODNEY M. FELDMANN 1970 Northern Ohio Geological Society ELYP.i.A PU&UC LIBRARt as, BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO PENNSYLVANIAN SYSTEM MISSISSIPPIAN SYSTEM DEVONIAN SYSTEM \V&fe'£:i£:VS:#: CANTON viSlSWSSWM FIGURr I Geologic map of northeastern Ohio. Individual formations within each time unit are not dis- -guished, and glacial deposits have been omitted. Because the bedding planes are nearly ••.crizontal, the map patterns of the contacts closely resemble the topographic contours at those z evations. The older and deeper units are most extensively exposed where the major rivers rave cut into them, while the younger units are preserved in the intervening higher areas. CO «< in Dev. Mississippian r-c Penn. a> 3 CO CD BRADF. KINOERHOOK MERAMEC —1 OSAGE CHESTER POTTSVIUE ro to r-» c-> e-> e= e-i GO n « -n V) CO V* o ^_ ^ 0. = -^ eo CO 3 c= « ^> <C3 at ta B> ^ °» eu ra to a O9 eo ^ a* s 1= ca \ *** CO ^ CO to CM v» o' CO to CO 3 =3 13- *•» \ ¥\ A. FIGURE 1. Columnar section ol the major stratigraphic units in northeastern Ohio showing their relative positions in the standard geologic time scale. The Devonian-Mississippian boundary is not known with certainty to lie within the Cleveland Shale. The base of the Mississippian in the northern part of the state is transitional with the Bradford Series of the Devonian System and may lie within the Cleveland Shale (Weller er a/., 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Ichnology, Depositional Dynamics and Sequence Stratigraphy Of
    ICHNOLOGY, DEPOSITIONAL DYNAMICS AND SEQUENCE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE ORINOCO DELTA: MAYARO AND MORNE L’ENFER FORMATIONS, SOUTHERN TRINIDAD A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) In the Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada By SUDIPTA DASGUPTA Copyright Sudipta Dasgupta, November, 2015. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis as the partial fulfillment of requirements for a Ph.D. degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I understand and confirm that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be allowed by the Dr. Luis A. Buatois who supervised my thesis work or, in his absence, by the Head, Department of Geological Sciences, or the Dean of the Colleges of Graduate Studies and Research (CGSR), in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for any direct or indirect financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission or, in my absence, without written permission from my immediate heir. It is also implicit that appropriate recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. DISCLAIMER References in this thesis to any specific commercial product(s), process(es), or service(s) by trade name(s), trademark(s), manufacturer(s), private company(ies), or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its(or their) endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by me or the University of Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1
    Late Devonian and Early Mississippian Distal Basin-Margin Sedimentation of Northern Ohio1 THOMAS L. LEWIS, Department of Geological Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115 ABSTRACT. Clastic sediments, derived from southeastern, eastern and northeastern sources, prograded west- ward into a shallow basin at the northwestern margin of the Appalachian Basin in Late Devonian and Early Mississippian time. The western and northwestern boundary of the basin was the submerged Cincinnati Arch. The marine clastic wedges provided a northwest paleoslope and a distal, gentle shelf-edge margin that controlled directional emplacement of coarse elastics. Rising sea levels coupled with differences in sedimen- tation rates and localized soft-sediment deformation within the basin help explain some features of the Bedford and Berea Formations. The presence of sand-filled mudcracks and flat-topped symmetrical ripple marks in the Berea Formation attest to very shallow water deposition and local subaerial exposure at the time of emplacement of part of the formation. Absence of thick, channel-form deposits eastward suggests loss of section during emergence. OHIO J. SCI. 88 (1): 23-39, 1988 INTRODUCTION The Bedford Formation (Newberry 1870) is the most The Ohio Shale, Bedford, and Berea Formations of lithologically varied formation of the group. It is com- northern Ohio are clastic units which record prograda- prised of gray and red mudshales, siltstone, and very tional and transgressional events during Late Devonian fine-grained sandstone. The Bedford Formation thins and Early Mississippian time. The sequence of sediments both to the east and west and reaches its maximum is characterized by (1) gray mudshale, clayshale, siltstone, thickness in the Cleveland area.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Data List Special Edition
    Newsletter of the Southern African Botanical Diversity Network Volume 6 No. 3 ISSN 1027-4286 November 2001 Invasive Alien Plants Part 2 Southern Mozambique Expedition Living Plant Collections: Lowveld, Mozambique, Namibia REDSABONET NewsDATA Vol. 6 No. 3 November LIST 2001 SPECIAL EDITION153 c o n t e n t s Red Data List Features Special 157 Profile: Ezekeil Kwembeya ON OUR COVER: 158 Profile: Anthony Mapaura Ferraria schaeferi, a vulnerable 162 Red Data Lists in Southern Namibian near-endemic. 159 Tribute to Paseka Mafa (Photo: G. Owen-Smith) Africa: Past, Present, and Future 190 Proceedings of the GTI Cover Stories 169 Plant Red Data Books and Africa Regional Workshop the National Botanical 195 Herbarium Managers’ 162 Red Data List Special Institute Course 192 Invasive Alien Plants in 170 Mozambique RDL 199 11th SSC Workshop Southern Africa 209 Further Notes on South 196 Announcing the Southern 173 Gauteng Red Data Plant Africa’s Brachystegia Mozambique Expedition Policy spiciformis 202 Living Plant Collections: 175 Swaziland Flora Protection 212 African Botanic Gardens Mozambique Bill Congress for 2002 204 Living Plant Collections: 176 Lesotho’s State of 214 Index Herbariorum Update Namibia Environment Report 206 Living Plant Collections: 178 Marine Fishes: Are IUCN Lowveld, South Africa Red List Criteria Adequate? Book Reviews 179 Evaluating Data Deficient Taxa Against IUCN 223 Flowering Plants of the Criterion B Kalahari Dunes 180 Charcoal Production in 224 Water Plants of Namibia Malawi 225 Trees and Shrubs of the 183 Threatened
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Roy 7.5' Quadrangle Weber And
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate 1 a divison of Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication MP-05-03 Utah Department of Natural Resources Geologic Map of the Roy 7.5' Quadrangle Qsm Qal1 Qsm Qal Qal Qal2 1 B 1 B' Qsm Qsm Qsm Qal1 Qsm Qal2 Qal2 Qsm Qsm Qal1 Qd2 Qd2 Qsm Qsm Qsm Qal1 G Qal2 Qd5 Qsm Qsm Qsm G Qal2 Qd Qdm 4 Qal2 Qd Qd1 1 Qal Qd2 Qsm 2 G Qd5 Qsm Qdm Qdm Qaf Qal3 Qd4 Qd4 Qdm Qd1 G Qd1 Qsm Qd3 Qd Qac Qdm Qdm 1 Qsm Qdm Qd5 U D Qd G Qsm Qal4 5 Qdm Qaf Qd1 Qd5 Qdm Qdm Qd1 Qac Qd Qd5 4 Qdm Qla G Qsm ? Qsm Qd Qsm 5 Qsm Qdm Qd1 Qaf Qsm Qd5 Qsm Qsm Qsm Qd5 Qdm Qsm Qda Qd4 Qd5 Qd4 G Qsm Qd Qsm 5 Qd3 Qaf Qaf Qd5 Qdm Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qd5 Qsm Qd6 Qdm Qsm Qd1 Qla Qsm Qsm G Qsm Qsm Qdm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qsm Qda Qsm Qda Qd1 Qaf Qd4 Qdm U D Qsm Qd Qaf Qdm 1 G Qsm Qaf Qsm Qsm Qd6 Qaf Qdm Qsm Qaf Qaf Qd4 ? Qsm Qac Qlf G Qsm Qsm Qd3 Qat1 Qdm Qda Qaf Qaf Qd7 Qsm Qd4 Qda Qsm Qsm Qaf Qda Qat Qsm 2 Qaf Qaf Qsm Qlf G Qsm Qsm Qsm Qat3 Qaf Qac Qsm Qlf Qsm Qlf Qsm Qaf Qsm Qlf Qlf Qlf Qaf Qat Qat Qat 1 8 7 Qac G Qlf Qsm Qlf Qac Qsm Qat Qd8 5 Qat6 Qla Qal2 Qlf Qls Qaf Qlf Qd4 Qla Qac Qlf/Qd4 Qlf Qaf Qat8 Qat1 Qaf Qaf Qac Qac U D Qaf Qla Qal1 ? Qaf Qlf Qac Qaf Qlf Qat4 Qat2 Qac Qaf Qd9 Qal2 Qlf Qat Qac 3 Qaf Qaf Qd10 Qla Qla Qac Qlf Qaf Qd13 Qlf Qlf Qac Qlf/Qd G Qlf 4 Qlf Qd13 Qaf Qla Qaf Qaf Qms Qlf Qlf Qlf Qlf/Qd4 Qla Qlf/Qd4 Qla Qla Qla Qaf Qlf/Qd4 Qac Qlf Qla Qaf Qlf Qlf Qd11 Qlf Qlf Qaf Qlf/Qd4 G Qla Qla Qlf Qla Qaf Qac Qlf Qaf Qlf Qal1 Qlf Qac Qaf Qaf Qlf Qaf Qlf G Qlf Qla Qsm Qlf Qaf Qat9 Qac Qsm Qaf Qlf/Qd4 Qlf/Qd4 Qaf Qsm Qsm G Qlf Qla Qls/Qd13 Qaf Qlf Qaf Qaf Qaf Qlf Qal Qla 1 Qsm U D G Qla/Qd13 Qaf Qd12 ? Qlf/Qd4 Qls/Qd13 Qaf Qls/Qd Qla 13 Qd13 G Qla Qaf A Qlf Qd13 LH A' Base from U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription of Yinostius Major (Arthrodira: Heterostiidae) from the Lower Devonian of China, and the Interrelationships of Brachythoraci
    bs_bs_banner Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015. With 10 figures Redescription of Yinostius major (Arthrodira: Heterostiidae) from the Lower Devonian of China, and the interrelationships of Brachythoraci YOU-AN ZHU1,2, MIN ZHU1* and JUN-QING WANG1 1Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Received 29 December 2014; revised 21 August 2015; accepted for publication 23 August 2015 Yinosteus major is a heterostiid arthrodire (Placodermi) from the Lower Devonian Jiucheng Formation of Yunnan Province, south-western China. A detailed redescription of this taxon reveals the morphology of neurocranium and visceral side of skull roof. Yinosteus major shows typical heterostiid characters such as anterodorsally positioned small orbits and rod-like anterior lateral plates. Its neurocranium resembles those of advanced eubrachythoracids rather than basal brachythoracids, and provides new morphological aspects in heterostiids. Phylogenetic analysis based on parsimony was conducted using a revised and expanded data matrix. The analysis yields a novel sce- nario on the brachythoracid interrelationships, which assigns Heterostiidae (including Heterostius ingens and Yinosteus major) as the sister group of Dunkleosteus amblyodoratus. The resulting phylogenetic scenario suggests that eubrachythoracids underwent a rapid diversification during the Emsian, representing the placoderm response to the Devonian Nekton Revolution. The instability of the relationships between major eubrachythoracid clades might have a connection to their longer ghost lineages than previous scenarios have implied. © 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015 doi: 10.1111/zoj.12356 ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: Brachythoraci – Heterostiidae – morphology – phylogeny – Placodermi.
    [Show full text]