Mid-Market Developement Update
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A
DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls. -
Issues Are Being Reported Throughout All of San Francisco and What the City Is Doing to Resolve Them
NO. 160 PUBLISHED BY THE CENTRAL CITY A telling tale SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER October of challenges 2 015 for housing 4,400 in The City UNITS IN 1400 Mission began as 25 YEARS low-income, but city made san francisco it plum for a smart builder Affordable housing built UNK S ENDERLOIN OOTS BY M ARJORIE BEGGS P ‘ T R since 1989 T WAS A SWEET BIT of chronologi- cal serendipity: In August, the city an- PAGE 3 I nounced the moderate-income lottery winners who were eligible to buy 167 condos at the new, glass-clad 1400 Mission complex at the corner of 10th Street. Two miles east, at Folsom and Main streets, the first owners began moving into Lumina, 656 super-luxe condos. The connection between the two is direct, the timing’s not coincidental, the backstory convoluted — and telling. Tishman Speyer built 1400 Mission for $65 million and Lumina for $620 million. One is inclusionary affordable housing, the other, by dint of price, exclusionary. With the exception of 23 rental apartments at 1400 Mission, all 823 condos are for sale. How much Tishman will profit from Lumina will probably be known only to Tishman Speyer. At 1400 Mission, the city 2 WHO has posted estimated sales totals for the WERE The city credited Tishman 167 condos at just nearly $50 million for under $50 million. So MOURNED meeting its inclusionary it may be fair to ask if Deosia Henderson, requirement. the big developer has used an affordable Stevie L. Newsom housing project to en- able its lucrative investment in the Lumina. -
Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Programs, Tariffs, and Rulemaking 13-11-007 Policies. (Filed November 14, 2013) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE-GRID INTEGRATION PILOT PROGRAM (“POWER YOUR DRIVE”) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT has been electronically mailed to each party of record on the service list in R.13-11-007. SDG&E is unable to serve the report to A.14- 04-014 because that service list has been closed. Any party on the service list who has not provided an electronic mail address was served by placing a copy in a properly addressed and sealed envelope and depositing such envelope in the United States Mail with first-class postage prepaid. A copy was also sent via Federal Express to the Assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding. Executed this 6th day of September 2016 at San Diego, California /s/ Tamara Grabowski Tamara Grabowski CPUC - Service Lists - R1311007 Page 1 of 15 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1311007 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: AUGUST 19, 2016 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CAMERON SEAN GRAY JEREMY WAEN ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGER SR. REGULATORY ANALYST COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY JOHN BOESEL JOHN W. -
Viewing Instructions
Viewing Instructions This file has been indexed or bookmarked to simplify navigation between documents. If you are unable to view the document index, download the file to your local drive and open it using your PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader). SUPPLEMENT DATED AUGUST 24, 2012 to OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED AUGUST 14, 2012 Relating to $251,100,000 $38,265,000 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2012D SERIES 2012E This Supplement, dated August 24, 2012 (the "Supplement"), supplements and amends the Official Statement, dated August 14, 2012 (the "Official Statement"), relating to the above-captioned Bonds, as described below. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the definitions provided in the Official Statement. The following new paragraph is added following the “Sources and Uses of Funds” table on page 9 of the Official Statement: In connection with the purchase of the 2012D Bonds, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGMI”) has advised the City that CGMI acted as agent for its affiliate, Citibank, N.A., as direct purchaser of the 2012D Bonds and that, as agent, CGMI receives no underwriter’s discount or other compensation for such service. Accordingly, CGMI, for its purposes, allocated the full amount of underwriter’s discount to the 2012E Bonds. The City’s policy with respect to a combined sale of different series of Bonds is to allocate costs of issuance of all series of the Bonds on a pro rata basis among the series, and such allocation is reflected in the table above. -
AUGUST 1995 204 NUMB: Chief Criticizes POA Negotiations Update Byalthgueiro Ties Reach Agreement
I II Member of COPS California Organization of Police & Sheriffs !1 SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATI( To Promote the Ideals, Policies and Accomplishments of the Association and its Members VOLUME 27 - SAN FRANCISCO, AUGUST 1995 204 NUMB: Chief Criticizes POA Negotiations Update byAlThgueiro ties reach agreement. The City Challenge to "Provisionals" Charger provides for binding interest iegouauoris nave been taking arbitration for police officers, Chief Ribera has been making the single individual to determine who place between the City and POA ne- firefighters and other city employ- rounds recently telling members that gets a particular job and who does gotiating committees since June 14, ees. In a nutshell, that means that if the 21 provisional sergeant appoint- not, without a competitive examina- 1995. The process takes a great deal an agreement cannot be reached, an ments he announced, effective Au- tion of some sort. There needn't be of time and requires patience and impasse is declared. A mediator/ gust 26, 1995, are really good for the any provisional appointments at all. care. Provisions will be implemented arbitrator is then selected and if the department and that the POA is our Regular examinations should be con- as a result of these negotiations which parties still can't reach agreement, of line for criticizing them. ducted and, if they were, there would will have a very significant impact on the arbitrator is required to decide These 21 "provisional" appoint- always be eligible lists from which to the wages, hours and working condi- the issues in dispute on an issue by ments are not the first the Chief has appoint members who passed ap- tions of San Francisco's police offic- issue basis. -
Community Plan Exemption Checklist
Community Plan Exemption Checklist Case No.: 2013.0973E Project Address: 150 Van Ness Avenue 155 Hayes Street 101 Hayes Street/69 Polk Street 131-135 Hayes Street 125 Hayes Street Zoning: C-3-G (Downtown General Commercial) Use District Van Ness and Market Downtown Residential Special Use District 120-R-2 Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 0814/001, 014, 015, 016, and 021 Lot Size: Five lots totaling 46,490 square feet (approximately 1.07 acres) Plan Area: Market and Octavia Area Plan Project Sponsor: Marc Babsin, Emerald Fund – (415) 489-1313 [email protected] Staff Contact: Sandy Ngan – (415) 575-9102 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location The project site is located at the edge of the Downtown/Civic Center neighborhood and the project area is characterized by office and institutional uses, residential uses, and neighborhood commercial uses, including restaurants, bars, cafés, hotels, fitness studios, and a variety of retail establishments. The project site is located on five parcels (Assessor’s Block 0814; Lots 001, 014, 015, 016, and 021) bordered by Hayes Street to the north, Polk Street to the east, adjacent properties to the south, and Van Ness Avenue to the west. The five parcels comprising the project site total 46,490 square feet in size (approximately 1.07 acres) and are located in a C-3-G (Downtown General) Zoning District, the Van Ness and Market Downtown Residential Special Use District, and a 120-R-2 Height and Bulk District, within the Market and Octavia Area Plan. The project site is currently occupied by a vacant office development (150 Van Ness Avenue, a seven- story, 95-foot-tall building on Lot 014, and 155 Hayes Street, an eight-story, 108-foot-tall building addition to the 150 Van Ness Avenue building, on Lot 015) totaling 149,049 square feet and four surface parking lots (Lots 001, 015, 016, and 021) with 99 off-street parking spaces. -
Chinese Hospital Rises in Heart of Chinatown
114th Year OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF SAN FRANCISCO Volume 114, No. 1 January 2014 www.SFBuildingTradesCouncil.org Chinese Hospital Rises in Heart of Chinatown ♦ All-Union Project Starts Steel Work By Paul Burton is expected to be completed by Image courtesy of Chinese Hospital Contributing Writer the Chinese New Year of 2015. The new facility will be new hospital adjacent to the hospital’s build- in the heart of ing that opened in 1979, which Chinatown is is becoming overcrowded. being built with The construction project itself an all-union faces the challenge of being in Acrew. General contractor DPR a crowded commercial neigh- Construction completed a borhood, with heavy vehicle major concrete pour at the end and pedestrian traffic and little of December, and Herrick Steel room for heavy equipment is set to begin erecting steel this and trucks. The San Francisco month for the Chinese Hospi- Business Times noted that, tal. Demolition of the original “The neighborhood that sur- hospital building at 835 Jack- rounds the project site is always son Street built in 1924 began bustling with activity… Fish in late 2012. and produce markets, with deliveries thrice daily, populate Oldest Independent the area. And the still-active Hospital other half of Chinese Hospital, Chinese Hospital is San (continued on page 21) The new $169 million Chinese Hospital replacement project will be adjacent to the hospital’s building that Francisco’s oldest independent opened in 1979 and is expected to be completed by the Chinese New Year of 2015. community hospital and is a unique healthcare provider with a long and rich history Demo Begins on Old Bay Bridge of providing access to health care services for the Chinese ♦ Historic Photos and Computer Imaging Will be Used to Overcome Safety Challenges community. -
The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco
The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco May 2013 Contents Executive Summary Currently Selling Developments Resale Developments Pipeline Report TMC Disclaimer Notes 1) Currently Selling is defined as a new construction residential project selling for the first time or a project in which units have never been lived in as owner-occupied. 2) Resale is defined as a residential unit that has been sold at least once before and has previously been lived in. 3) This report covers Currently Selling residential developments with 20+ Market Rate units and Resale residential developments with 50+ Market Rate units located in Districts 7, 8 and 9. 4) Assume that projects located in the Currently Selling section are actively selling units unless noted otherwise. 5) Date On Market refers to the date the Sales Center opened. 6) Average Absorption is calculated from Date On Market through the first of the month prior to the date of the report. It accounts for units both in contract and closed. 7) Average Price/SF is calculated using only units where both square footage and price are known. Average Price/SF is defined as the average price divided by the average square footage. Averages are weighted averages. 8) Developments are considered Sold Out once the last Market Rate unit has closed OR there have been six months without a closing, all units are in contract and the Sales Center is closed (e.g. there is no active marketing). At that point, projects will be moved to the Resale section and tracked for resale closings. 9) Market Rate Units Available in the Pipeline Report refers to the estimated number of Market Rate units available for sale at the development (e.g. -
Consumer's Resource Handbook. INSTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C
DOCUMENT RESUME _ED' 299 376 CE 049 396 TITLE, Consumer's Resource Handbook. INSTITUTION Office of Consumer Affairs, Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 88 NOTE 100p. PUB TYPE Guides - Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adults; *Consumer Education; *Consumer Protection; Merchandise Information; *Money Management; *Organizations (Groups); *Resources IDENTIFIERS *Consumer Complaints ABSTRACT This-handbook is intended to help consumers exercise their rights in the marketplace in three ways. It shows how to communicate more effectively with manufacturers, retailers, and service providers; it is a self-help manual for resolving individual consumer complaints; and it lists helpful sources of assistance. The handbook has two sections. Part I, How To Be a-Smart Consumer, features tips on avoiding purchasing problems and getting the most for-one's money. It gives steps-for handling one's own complaint and writing an effective complaint letter. Part II, the Consumer Assistance Directory, lists consumer offices-in both the public and private sectors that provide assistance for consumer complaints. An indek-in the back of the -handbook lists, by subject, the appropriate contact. Consumer tips and remainders on resolving complaints appear throughout the handbook- These tips are also in the indek by subject. The handbook is a handy reference tool for.consumers; additional users include educators (as a source of information and ideas for developing and teaching innovative consumer education courses) and consumer leaders in business and government (as a resource for locating others who share consumer program objectives and who can help resolve consumer complaints). (YLB) *************************************************************t********* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. -
2005-2006 Annual Report
ng Inspection Building Inspection Commission Department of Buildi Administration Program Permit Services Inspection Services Boards andCommissions Boards 2005-2006 Annual Report 1 Letter from the Mayor Department of Building Inspection 2 2005-2006 DBI Annual Report Table of Contents Annual Report • July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006 Building Inspection Commission Building Inspection Commission ........................................................4 Department Of Building Inspection Organization Chart ..........................................................................10 Director’s Office ...............................................................................11 Administration Program Administration Program Organization Chart ..................................20 ng Inspection Administration & Finance Division ...................................................21 Management Information Services ..................................................23 Public Services Division ...................................................................25 Permit Services Building Inspection Commission Permit Services Program Organization Chart .................................30 Department of Buildi Central Permit Bureau .....................................................................31 Commercial Plan Check Division ......................................................33 Administration Program Major and UMB Plan Check Division ................................................37 Mechanical Plan Check Division .......................................................41 -
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2001
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year ended June 30, 2001 Prepared by: Office of the Controller Edward Harrington Controller CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTORY SECTION Controller’s Letter of Transmittal ................................................................................................... i Certificate of Achievement - Government Finance Officers Association ...................................... ix Certificate of Award - California Society of Municipal Finance Officers ........................................ x Organization Chart ........................................................................................................................ xi List of Principal Officials ................................................................................................................ xii FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditors’ Report........................................................................................................ 1 Management Discussion and Analysis.......................................................................................... 3 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets...................................................................................................... 18 Statement of Activities .........................................................................................................20 -
Multifamily Development Pipeline
ID PROJECT CITY UNITS BAY AREA ID PROJECT CITY UNITS 1 Amero - 1501 Filbert Street San Francisco 27 55 1500 Newell Ave - The Village Mixed Use Walnut Creek 49 2 1645 Pacific Avenue San Francisco 39 Multifamily Development Pipeline 56 651 Addison Street - Archstone Berkeley on Addison Berkeley 94 3 Marlow - 1800 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco 98 57 64th and Christie - Marketplace Development Emeryville 193 4 2655 Bush Street San Francisco 81 Projects >25 units scheduled for delivery by 2016 58 1225 Powell Street - Archstone Parkside Emeryville 180 5 1450 Franklin Street San Francisco 69 59 Powell, Hollis, and Doyle Street - Parkside Apartments Emeryviile 168 6 1465 Pine Street San Francisco 35 60 3501 San Pablo Ave - California Hotel Oakland 137 7 1080 Sutter Street San Francisco 35 61 MacArthur BART Transit Village Oakland 624 8 Trinity Place (Phase III) San Francisco 550 2126 M L King Jr Way, 616 21st St, 620 21st St 62 Oakland 100 9 235 Broadway San Francisco 75 Cathedral Gardens 10 Mission Bay - Block 11 San Francisco 190 63 460 Grand Ave Oakland 68 11 181 Fremont Street San Francisco 74 64 Brooklyn Basin Oakland 3100 12 Plaza A - 318 Main Street San Francisco 59 65 7100 Mountain Boulevard - Monte Vista Villas Oakland 167 13 Lumina - 201 Folsom Street San Francisco 669 66 4700 Norris Canyon Rd - Park Central San Ramon 116 14 Transbay Blocks 6 & 7 - 299 Fremont San Francisco 409 67 6617 Dublin Blvd - Tralee Dublin 233 15 340 Fremont Street San Francisco 348 68 800 & 888 N San Mateo Dr San Mateo 155 16 Tower B - 301 Beale Street San Francisco