Newsletterq3 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletterq3 2015 Colton Commercial & Partners, Inc. State of San Francisco the Market NEWSLETTERQ3 2015 Quick Trends Manhattanization of San Francisco Historically, San Francisco’s skyline has been dominated by the Transamerica Pyramid, the Statistics Bank of America Building, and the Golden Gate Bridge. If you hadn’t visited the city in the past ten years and were returning via car from SFO, you might think you were somewhere other than San Francisco. Let’s examine the current landscape of development activity: Citywide Average Vacancy MAJOR OFFICE PROJECTS* Citywide Average Asking Rates • The developers of 505 Brannan Street, Alexandria Real Estate Equities and TMG Partners, now want to increase the height limit from 85 feet to 250 feet for their new Class A Buildings Asking Rates office tower. This property is 100% preleased to Pinterest. • Boston Properties development at 415 Mission Street, AKA Salesforce Tower, should be Class B Buildings Asking Rates completed by the beginning of 2017 and will reach a height of 1,070 feet, consisting of 61 stories. This property is 50% preleased currently to Salesforce. Sublease Inventory • TMG’s proposed tower at 1st and Mission Streets, if approved, will reach a height of 850 feet, consisting of 64 stories and 1,250,000 square feet. Unemployment Rate • Tishman Speyer’s development at 222 Second Street, now under construction, is projected to be completed by the end of 2015 and will reach a height of 356 feet. This property is 100% preleased to LinkedIn. • Jay Paul Company’s development at 181 Fremont is planned to reach a height of 801 feet. There are no leases currently signed in this property. “Success is not final; • Park Tower at Transbay at 43 floors high, sitting just below the height of 181 Fremont, will provide over 751,500+ square feet of Class A space delivered in Q1 2018. failure is not fatal: • Tishman Speyer is in initial discussions with the Planning Department to build a proposed office tower at 10 Van Ness Avenue, which could reach a height of 570 feet. It is the courage to • 524 Howard Street is a proposed office tower which is presently on hold, but the initial plans are to build a tower reaching to 310 feet. continue that counts.” PROMINENT RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS* • Crescent Heights recently developed and completed four interconnected residential - Winston S. Churchill towers called NEMA located at 8 10th Street. The tallest of the towers reaches a height of 352 feet. • Align’s new proposed residential tower at 30 Otis could be 450 feet tall, according to the current development proposal. • Millennium Partners’ completed development, known as the Millennium Tower, located at 301 Mission Street, rises to a height of 645 feet. *Partial list. In summary, is bigger equal to better? Developers think so! The operative question will be whether or not the “Manhattanization” of San Francisco is a good idea. We do know that it has been great for the creation of jobs and good for the San Francisco economy, but what COLTON will be the long-term aesthetic effects on the quality of life for the San Francisco business and commercial & residential communities? PARTNERS 565 Commercial Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 An API Global Affiliate P: 415.834.1600 • F: 415.834.1601 • www.coltoncommercialsf.com State of San Francisco the Market NEWSLETTERQ3 2015 COLTON COMMERCIAL Top 10 Recent Leases* & PARTNERS RECENTLY CLOSED TENANT ADDRESS LEASE TYPE SQUARE FEET +/- TRANSACTIONS Stripe Inc. 510 Townsend St. Direct 300,000 Property: Office Building Uber 555 Market St. Direct 172,838 Location: 1 California Street Represented: LendingHome Broker: J. Shaffer LendingClub 595 Market St. Direct 133,534 Corporation Property: Office Building Location: 140 Geary Street Advent Software, 600 Townsend St. Renewal 129,491 Represented: 2600 Hz. Inc. Broker: A. Galindo, I. Osborne Property: Office Building First Republic Bank 388 Market St. Renewal 103,000 Location: 340 Brannan Street Represented: ArcTouch Broker: J. Shaffer Mixpanel 405 Howard St. Direct 60,593 Property: Office Building Location: 750 Clementina Street Instacart 50 Beale St. Direct 56,228 Represented: Nebia Inc. Broker: I. Osborne Property: Office Building AON 425 Market St. Direct 53,180 Location: Hills Plaza Represented: Breather Broker: A. Galindo, I. Osborne Slack Technologies 155 5th St. Sublease 48,812 Property: Office Building Location: 353 Sacramento Street WeWork 995 Market St. Direct 45,738 Represented: Dillingham & Murphy LLP Broker: B. Colton * Year to Date Property: Office Building Location: 425 2nd Street Represented: US Enterprise Corp. Broker: M. Walker Top 5 Recent Sales** Property: Office Building Location: 121 2nd Street (Multiple Leases) Represented: Fjeld Family LP ADDRESS PRICE PRICE perSF RBA BUYER Broker: B. Colton, J. Shaffer, I. Osborne, A. Galindo 50 Fremont St. $640,000,000 $782.96 817,412 Salesforce Property: Office Building Location: 1244 Sutter Street Represented: ARGONAUT The Blackstone One Market Plaza $610,050,000 $832.39 732,893 Broker: B. Colton, J. Shaffer Group LP Property: Office Building Location: 349 Sutter Street 50 Beale St. $395,000,000 $596.62 662,060 Paramount Group Represented: Korth Sunseri Hagey Architects Broker: M. Walker Columbia 650 California St. $309,000,000 $645.91 478,392 Property: Office Building Property Trust Location: 381 Bush Street Represented: Landlord (Several Leases) 275 Battery St. $306,200,000 $644.44 475,138 Rockpoint Group LLC Broker: R. Walker, M. Walker ** Within the past 12 months State of San Francisco the Market NEWSLETTERQ3 2015 Market Data Asking Rents Are Being Driven By The Top 5% of the Market SUB MARKET AVG ANNUAL ASKING RATE PER SF VACANCY RATE RENTAL RATE TREND N. Financial District $65.50 8.4% x S. Financial District $67.00 7.0% x Jackson Square $56.25 6.5% x North Waterfront $49.00 6.1% x Union Square $57.50 5.0% x Yerba Buena $60.75 5.2% Civic Center $56.50 8.5% Rincon / South Beach $69.00 4.2% x SOMA $60.00 8.1% x Mission $51.25 8.25% x S.F. Historical Unemployment Data 9% 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015* *Projected Citywide San Francisco Vacancy 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 2014 2014 2015 2015 2015* *Projected Colton Commercial & Partners, Inc. Colton Commercial & Partners is a full-service commercial real estate firm specializing in Leasing, Investment Sales, Property Management and Project Management in San Francisco and the Greater Bay Area. With over 150 years of combined experience, our team of commercial real estate brokers bring service and expertise to a whole new level. Bradley L. Colton President [email protected] Colton Commercial License #00805116 and Partners is Jay D. Shaffer pleased to present the Partner & Co-Founder exclusive sale listing of: [email protected] License #01444640 701 Sutter St., Robert J. Walker Broker Associate San Francisco [email protected] License #00442500 701 Sutter Street is Mark D. Walker an 18,800 +/- sf Senior Vice President mixed-use commercial [email protected] property that is License #00878051 currently 100% R. Ian Osborne Senior Associate leased. [email protected] License #01936294 701 Sutter is a strategic value-added investment Adon P. Galindo opportunity. 701 Sutter is located in the Union Sales & Leasing Associate Square district of San Francisco. [email protected] License #01964002 For more information, please contact exclusive listing agent: Adam Felson Jay D. Shaffer Director of Project Management [email protected] [email protected] (415) 834-1600 ext. 203 Sonia C. Santiago License: 01444640 Senior Project Manager [email protected] COLTON commercial & PARTNERS 565 Commercial Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 P: 415.834.1600 • F: 415.834.1601 • www.coltoncommercialsf.com The foregoing is based upon information provided by others which we believe is accurate, however, no guarantee, warranty or representation is made. We recommend that all interested parties independently verify its accuracy and completeness. .
Recommended publications
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A
    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-008009Oth
    MEMO TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: October 1, 2020 September 24, 2020 Record No.: 2020-008009OTH Subject: Planning Commission Policy: Implementing Proposition E Staff Contact: Corey Teague, Zoning Administrator – (628) 652-7328 [email protected] Recommendation: Adopt the Proposed Resolution Office Development Annual Limit Program San Francisco’s Office Development Annual Limit Program (“Program”) was initially created in 1985 as part of the Downtown Plan. It limited the amount of large office development (projects containing at least 50,000 square feet of office space) that could be permitted each year in the City (the “Large Cap”). The passage of Proposition M the following year amended the Program in various ways, including the addition of a new and separate annual limit for smaller office development (projects containing between 25,000 square feet to 49,999 square feet), which is commonly known as the “Small Cap.” Each October 17th the Program receives an allotment of 875,000 square feet for the Large Cap, and allotment of 75,000 square feet for the Small Cap. Under the original Program, the Planning Commission could not allocate office space to any development in excess of what was available in the relevant cap at that time. Additionally, unallocated office space in one year rolls over to the next year, and unused office space may be revoked and returned to the relevant cap. A net total of more than 12 Million square feet of office was allocated from the Large Cap in the last 10 years, with the most recent allocations for projects within Central SoMa.
    [Show full text]
  • 181 Fremont Street
    SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT Certificate of Determination 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 EXEMPTION FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 Case No.: 2007.0456E Reception: Project Title: 181 Fremont Street 415.558.6378 Zoning/Plan Area: C-3-0 (SD) Downtown Office Special Development District; Transit Center Commercial Special Use District; 415.558.6409 700-S Height and Bulk District; Transit Center District Plan Block/Lot: Planning 3719/10 & 11 Information: Lot Size: 15,312.5 square feet 415.558.6377 Project Sponsor: Daniel R. Kingsley, SKS Fremont, LLC, (415) 421-8200 Staff Contact: Michael Jacinto (415) 575-9033 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project sponsor, SKS Fremont, LLC, proposes to demolish two existing structures and develop one 700-foot-tall tower (745 feet to the top of the parapet/mechanical screen) on two lots located at the east side of Fremont Street immediately south of the new Transhay Transit Center that is currently under construction. The project site, as shown in Figure 1, comprises two parcels, is approximately 15,310 square feet in size, and is located within the approved Transit Center District Plan (TCDP or Plan) area. The proposed tower would include a mix of office, residential, and retail, along with five levels of below grade parking, off-street loading spaces, residential and office lobbies and amenities for the project residents (continued on next page). EXEMPT STATUS: Exempt per Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines California. REMARKS: (see page 18, below) DETERMINATION: I do hereby certify that the above determination has been made pursuant to State and Local requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 San Francisco Residential Development
    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT JUNE 2016 NAVIGATION Click page numbers to be taken directly to page NEWS & MARKET CURRENTLY HIGHLIGHTS PERFORMANCE SELLING NEWS AND HIGHLIGHTS MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month CURRENTLY SELLING... Luxe New Condominiump. $1,218/SqFt + 15% p. + 2% p. Nearly half of second phase is under contract. Price per square foot3 is 4 1650 Broadway at Van5 Ness | Pacific Heights Shipyard’s Resale Condominium $1,042/SqFt + 11% + 2% averaging approximately $760. The first phase averaged approximately $660 per Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed square foot. New Apartment $5.10/SqFt + 7% N/A Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 Less than 100 units remain available at The Rockwell. Current absorption surpasses Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces 30 units a month. NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME Developer: Belrich Partners Sales are expected to commence this month at the second phase of Onyx , consisting Architect: Forum Design of 21 condominiums. Median Price & Closing Volume Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- Closings have commenced at Lumina’s Plaza A. Price per square$1,200,000 foot is averaging 180 approximately $1,500. to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio 160 Click development to be taken directly to page $1,000,000 Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone 140 Most Recent Quarter countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- $800,000ONE FRANKLIN 181 FREMONT ONE120 MISSION BAY THE HARRISONpliances, Uline THE wine coolers, PACIFIC Duravit and Hansgrohe 100 Median: $1,000,000 PROPOSED..
    [Show full text]
  • BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project
    Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District April 30, 2018 Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Prepared for San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District 300 Lakeside Drive, 21st floor Oakland, CA 94612 Prepared by 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 400 Oakland, CA 94612 April 30, 2018 DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Date of Publication of Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration: April 30, 2018 Project Title: BART Market Street Canopies and Escalators Modernization Project Sponsor and Lead Agency: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Contact Person and Phone Number: Janie Layton, (510) 874-7423 Project Location: Downtown San Francisco BART Stations (Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza). Project Description: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART), in cooperation with the City and County of San Francisco, is working to improve escalator durability and security at station entrances/exits along Market Street leading to the underground Embarcadero, Montgomery Street, Powell Street, and Civic Center/UN Plaza station concourses. The existing entrances/exits consist of variations of side-by-side stairs and escalators leading down to the underground concourse level, and are currently uncovered and exposed to inclement weather and discarded trash leading to frequent breakdowns of the existing escalators. The proposed improvements would include the installation of canopy covers over the entrances/exits, as well as replacement and refurbishment of existing street-level escalators. Each protective canopy would also be equipped with a motorized security grille that would lock at the sidewalk level of the station entrance/exit when the stations are closed.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Are Being Reported Throughout All of San Francisco and     What the City Is Doing to Resolve Them
    NO. 160 PUBLISHED BY THE CENTRAL CITY A telling tale SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER October of challenges 2 015 for housing 4,400 in The City UNITS IN 1400 Mission began as 25 YEARS low-income, but city made san francisco it plum for a smart builder Affordable housing built UNK S ENDERLOIN OOTS BY M ARJORIE BEGGS P ‘ T R since 1989 T WAS A SWEET BIT of chronologi- cal serendipity: In August, the city an- PAGE 3 I nounced the moderate-income lottery winners who were eligible to buy 167 condos at the new, glass-clad 1400 Mission complex at the corner of 10th Street. Two miles east, at Folsom and Main streets, the first owners began moving into Lumina, 656 super-luxe condos. The connection between the two is direct, the timing’s not coincidental, the backstory convoluted — and telling. Tishman Speyer built 1400 Mission for $65 million and Lumina for $620 million. One is inclusionary affordable housing, the other, by dint of price, exclusionary. With the exception of 23 rental apartments at 1400 Mission, all 823 condos are for sale. How much Tishman will profit from Lumina will probably be known only to Tishman Speyer. At 1400 Mission, the city 2 WHO has posted estimated sales totals for the WERE The city credited Tishman 167 condos at just nearly $50 million for under $50 million. So MOURNED meeting its inclusionary it may be fair to ask if Deosia Henderson, requirement. the big developer has used an affordable Stevie L. Newsom housing project to en- able its lucrative investment in the Lumina.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Tall Buildings Study
    SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STUDY Disclaimer: While the information presented in this report is believed to be correct, the Applied Technology Council assumes no responsibility for its accuracy or for the opinions expressed herein. The material presented in this publication should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability, and applicability by qualified professionals. Users of information from this publication assume all liability arising from such use. San Francisco Tall Buildings Study Prepared by APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 240 Redwood City, California 94065 www.ATCouncil.org Prepared for City and County of San Francisco Office of Resilience and Capital Planning Brian Strong, Chief Resilience Officer and Director Danielle Mieler, Principal Resilience Analyst San Francisco, California ATC MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT PROJECT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Ayse Hortacsu John D. Hooper (Task Leader) Justin Moresco David Bonowitz Gregory Deierlein PROJECT WORKING GROUPS Shahriar Vahdani Carlos Molina Hutt Preetish Kakoty CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Anne McLeod Hulsey TALL BUILDINGS EXECUTIVE PANEL Alireza Eksir Monfared Naomi Kelly (Chair) Max Rattie Mary Ellen Carroll Wen-Yi Yen Kathryn How Tom Hui TASK REVIEW PANEL Brian Strong Mark X. Haley William Walton December 2018 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TALL BUILDINGS STAKEHOLDERS Board of Supervisors Business District 3 San Francisco Chamber of Commerce District 6 Real Estate
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-01129C3602.Pdf
    SERVICE LIST JCCP 4765 ADDRESS PARTY Robert A. Randick Barbera Studio, Inc. Randick O’Dea & Tooliatos, LLP 5000 Hopyard Road, Suite 225 Pleasanton, CA 94588 [email protected] Carol Brophy Big Lots, Inc.; Big Lots Stores, Inc. Jonathan Lee Sedgwick LLP 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 [email protected] Jeffrey Margulies Bloomingdale’s, Inc.; Burlington Coat Factory William L. Troutman Warehouse Corporation; Dermstore LLC; Julie Glazer Marshalls of MA, Inc.; Marshalls of CA, LLC; Fulbright & Jaworksi LLP Nordstrom, Inc.; Ross Stores, Inc.; Target 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor Corporation; The TJX Companies, Inc. Los Angeles, CA 90071 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Mark N. Todzo Center for Environmental Health Howard Hirsch Lexington Law Group 503 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94117 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Michael R. O’Neil Crown Laboratories, Inc. Peter A. Austin Murphy Austin Adams Schoenfeld LLP 304 “S” Street Post Office Box 1319 Sacramento, CA 95812 [email protected] [email protected] John E. Dittoe CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Reed Smith LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] Thomas H. Clarke, Jr. Davion, Inc. Ropers, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley 75 Broadway, Suite 202 San Francisco, CA 94111 [email protected] [email protected] Andrew Oelz FragranceNet.com, Inc. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 [email protected] Julie A. Herzog J Beverly Hills, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Programs, Tariffs, and Rulemaking 13-11-007 Policies. (Filed November 14, 2013) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE-GRID INTEGRATION PILOT PROGRAM (“POWER YOUR DRIVE”) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT has been electronically mailed to each party of record on the service list in R.13-11-007. SDG&E is unable to serve the report to A.14- 04-014 because that service list has been closed. Any party on the service list who has not provided an electronic mail address was served by placing a copy in a properly addressed and sealed envelope and depositing such envelope in the United States Mail with first-class postage prepaid. A copy was also sent via Federal Express to the Assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding. Executed this 6th day of September 2016 at San Diego, California /s/ Tamara Grabowski Tamara Grabowski CPUC - Service Lists - R1311007 Page 1 of 15 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1311007 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: AUGUST 19, 2016 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CAMERON SEAN GRAY JEREMY WAEN ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGER SR. REGULATORY ANALYST COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY JOHN BOESEL JOHN W.
    [Show full text]
  • City and County of San Francisco
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 30, 2019 NEW ISSUE - BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATING: Fitch: “AA+” See “RATING” herein. In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, California, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications described in this Official Statement, under existing law, the interest on the Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Interest on the Bonds is not intended to be exempt from federal income taxation. Bond Counsel expresses no opinion regarding other federal or State tax consequences relating to the ownership or disposition of, or the accrual or receipt of interest on, the Bonds. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2014-1 (TRANSBAY TRANSIT CENTER) $31,940,000* $152,205,000* Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable) (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover This cover page contains certain information for general reference only. It is not intended to be a summary of the security or terms of this issue. Investors must read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to making an informed investment decision. The City and County of San Francisco, California (the “City”) on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) (the “District”) will be issuing Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A (Federally Taxable) (the “2019A Bonds”) and Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019B (Federally Taxable – Green Bonds) (the “2019B Bonds” and, together with the 2019A Bonds, the “2019 Bonds”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Route for the San Francisco Popos Hike (Privately Owned Public Open Spaces) February15, 2018 Dave Weinstein Copyright 2018 El Cerrito Trail Trekkers
    The Route for the San Francisco Popos hike (Privately Owned Public Open Spaces) February15, 2018 Dave Weinstein Copyright 2018 El Cerrito Trail Trekkers. No reproduction without express permission Intro: Mandated by 1985 the city’s downtown plan for new office developments in downtown, these are private spaces are required to be open to the public. Many are open only during business hours but others are public plazas open all the time. Some were created earlier, by developers seeking density bonuses in exchange, or the like. Problem is, people don’t know about many of these open spaces. (Sort of like the trails in El Cerrito.) In 2013 Chronicle urban writer John King wrote a series critiquing the way come owners made their spaces known, and how poorly the city enforced the rules. Since then thanks to John and increased public interest, things have improved. This tour is an update of a tour Trekkers gave in 2013. We will tour not just POPOS spaces but some other plazas and lobbies that are also open to the public, but without the POPOS mandate. We will note how many of these spaces contain excellent art, making downtown very much an open air and lobby museum that itself is too little known. Note: As performed on February 15, we did not get to all of these sites due to time constraints. We got to most, though! Crown Zellerbach 1 One. Meet at 1 Bush Street, Crown-Zellerbach Building. 1959, Hertzka and Knowles, SOM. (Hertzka, Wayne, Knowles, William Howard. 16 and 24th street BART stations, 100 Pine St., at least portions of Lawrence Berkeley Lab) First glass walled tower in city.
    [Show full text]