DOCSLIB.ORG

00 12181.04 Concord Group Pipeline Report 3Q14 7.29.2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
00 12181.04 Concord Group Pipeline Report 3Q14 7.29.2014 251 KEARNY STREET, SIXTH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 PHONE 415.397.5490 FAX 415.397.5496 369 SAN MIGUEL DRIVE, SUITE 265 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 PHONE 949.717.6450 FAX 949.717.6444 641 LEXINGTON AVE, SUITE 1400 NEW YORK, NY 10022 PHONE 646.354.7090 EXT. 22 SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA FINAL REPORT PREPARED FOR: PIPELINE REPORT 3Q 2014 JULY 2014 THE CONCORD GROUP SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PIPELINE REPORT JULY 2014 Data Summary by Submarket Urban East Bay San Francisco San Jose Market Units BMR Units Market Units BMR Units Market Units BMR Units For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) Conceptual 0 450 7,359 0 0 169 61 79 4,961 0 90 85 247 550 900 0 0 0 Preliminary Review 1,375 842 0 0 86 0 0 190 0 0 97 0 579 156 0 48 0 0 Application Under Review 520 4,924 2,281 0 743 56 1,284 2,837 5,208 47 494 1,517 3,137 371 1,528 16 125 0 Partially Entitled14702370005,97378413,9812,340454,3523890001020 Fully Entitled 434 2,299 296 38 402 0 1,404 2,148 26 129 963 3 890 4,837 746 0 749 0 Pulling Permits 292 379 0 0 33 0 41 291 0 0 9 0 0 284 0 0 64 0 Under Construction 257 3,633 254 0 1,087 24 2,294 4,745 0 426 1,264 0 606 4,965 371 0 370 0 Stalled 468 57 0 0 177 0 355 0 49 0 106 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Inactive 6352,2221233202812521,124245530086069001350 Pre-Leasing/Pre-Selling 0 92 142 0 0 25 564 1,081 0 9 151 0 1,368 954 0 0 90 0 Completed 0 9400002041,345207309001,143003830 Total: 4,128 14,992 10,692 41 2,530 274 12,461 13,752 25,369 2,960 3,983 6,264 8,076 13,329 3,545 64 2,018 0 Includes long-term development projects such as Treasure Island, Hunters Point, and ParkMerced. Remainder East Bay Peninsula Remainder South Bay Market Units BMR Units Market Units BMR Units Market Units BMR Units For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) For-Sale Rental Other (1) Conceptual 2671754420002,459789515000255445900 0 0 Preliminary Review24002,136000628429138132704662000600 0 Application Under Review 1,973 318 440 9 200 345 978 1,363 141 6 190 0 933 1,634 834 20 265 0 Partially Entitled 1,745 1,539 2,482 226 75 0 158 694 200 0 75 66 180 706 0 0 0 0 Fully Entitled 3,405 1,529 542 496 518 0 829 1,358 0 31 45 0 1,795 1,868 0 4 76 0 Pulling Permits 342 734 0 3 134 0 67 727 0 8 55 0 522 0 732 6 0 0 Under Construction 4,120 577 1,067 68 281 356 254 1,824 245 16 268 0 1,030 2,081 0 167 201 0 Stalled 1,871 0 0 25 0 0 48 10,382 0 2 21 0 709 325 0 0 170 0 Inactive 862 1,450 0 15 181 0 551 553 62 35 26 60 19 108 0 0 0 0 Pre-Leasing/Pre-Selling 275 300 0 33 0 0 1,219 242 0 69 22 0 1,367 388 0 67 24 0 Completed 145 236 0 10 78 0 195 666 0 10 173 0 212 238 0 0 180 0 Total: 15,245 6,858 7,109 885 1,467 701 7,386 19,027 1,301 190 902 126 7,258 8,092 2,156 324 916 0 For-Sale Rental Other (1) Market Rate Grand Total: 54,554 76,050 50,172 (1) "Other" includes all projects with a mix of rental and for-sale units as well as projects for which the Rental/For-Sale determination has not yet been made. BMR Grand Total: 4,464 11,816 7,365 THE CONCORD GROUP 2 THE CONCORD GROUP SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PIPELINE REPORT JULY 2014 Data Summary by Submarket - Regional Map Urban East Bay San Francisco Remainder East Bay Peninsula San Jose Remainder South Bay THE CONCORD GROUP 3 THE CONCORD GROUP SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PIPELINE REPORT JULY 2014 Status Legend Region Legend Status TCG Definition Region Cities Early-stage projects that have not yet submitted any type of application to a planning Conceptual San Francisco San Francisco jurisdiction and may not have determined many basic details such as unit counts or product type. Active projects that have submitted an application for initial review by planning department Preliminary staff or are actively seeking planning department input in preparation for full application San Jose San Jose Review submittal and/or revision. Active projects that have submitted a complete entitlement application that is actively being Application Urban East Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, and reviewed by planning staff and is under consideration for approval by respective planning Under Review Bay Oakland jurisdiction. Active projects that have not received 100% of entitlements needed before proceeding to plan Fremont, Lafayette, Livermore, Moraga, Newark, Partially Remainder check. Examples: projects with approved tentative maps but without approved environmental Orinda, Pleasanton, San Leandro, San Ramon, Entitled East Bay evaluation; projects that have all underlying zoning but have unresolved design issues; etc. Union City, Walnut Creek Active projects that have all entitlements necessary to submit construction drawings for building Belmont, Burlingame, Colma, Daly City, Foster Fully Entitled permit review. Note: projects that are fully approved but have appeals/lawsuits pending may City, Half Moon Bay, Los Altos, Menlo Park, also be categorized as "Stalled" depending on circumstances. Peninsula Millbrae, Mountain View, Pacifica, Palo Alto, Redwood City, San Bruno, San Carlos, and San Active, fully entitled projects that have begun submitting construction drawings for building Pulling Permits Mateo permits, including projects that have only applied for demolition permits. Active projects that have commenced demolition, grading, excavation or other preliminary Under Remainder Campbell, Cupertino, Gilroy, Los Gatos, Milpitas, construction activities at project site. Note: large single-family subdivisions that build as they Construction South Bay Morgan Hill, Santa Clara, Saratoga, and Sunnyvale sell will have this status. Projects that are under construction and have opened sales and or leasing offices with active Pre-Leasing/ contracting. Residents have not begun moving in and certificates of occupancy have not been Pre-Selling issued. Projects that have completed construction since previous update and are more than 90% leased Completed or sold. Most have certificates of occupancy or other final inspections scheduled or completed. Active projects that have recently encountered or are currently encountering a significant obstacle and cannot achieve full entitlement status or begin construction until said obstacle is Stalled resolved. Examples include: neighborhood opposition, environmental degradation, lawsuits, lack of financing, economic uncertainty, or other unforeseen circumstances. Projects that are no longer being pushed forward through the entitlement or construction Inactive processes due to: expiration of entitlements, developer inactivity, withdrawn applications, successful lawsuits, or any other reason that has created a long time period of project inactivity. THE CONCORD GROUP 4 THE CONCORD GROUP SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA PIPELINE REPORT JULY 2014 (sorted by City, then by number of Market-Rate and Below Market Rate units) Units Project Name Developer Address City Zip Region Tenure Type Market BMR Acres Last Action TCG Status Notes Lat Long Current planning efforts for land initiated by city Feb13. CC will likely approve zoning map, and Master Infr. Plan in early 2014; Alameda Point Urban East Full App Received on Application TC/Waterfront Precise Plans req PB and CC app--expect Redevelopment Plan SunCal Companies 2601 Monarch St Alameda 94501 Bay TBD Other 1,425 0 878 05/14/12 Under Review Mar/Apr14. TC resi no SFD; MS resi inc. SF. 37.7829 -122.305 Extremely early and conceptual. Zoned for around 800 units. Proposed 90 units for formerly homeless accomodation. Coast Guard Property (North Urban East First Contact on Memorandum of Understanding signed June 2012 between Navy Housing Parcel) US Navy 641 W Red Line Ave Alameda 94501 Bay TBD Other 820 90 42 11/05/07 Conceptual and governing bodies. 37.7893 -122.301 No formal application as of survey. Planner guesses app will be Tim Lewis 1521 Buena Vista Urban East Full App Received on for 400 MF units with condo map. Converting to apartment still Encinal Terminal Communities Ave Alameda 94501 Bay TBD Other 309 0 NA 10/15/13 Conceptual possible according to multiple sources. 37.7806 -122.258 Located in West End redevelopment area. Will be a mix of 3Bs, TriPointe Homes 2457 Mariner Square Urban East Site Approvals 4Bs, and 5Bs. Lot sizes ranging from 2,580 to 3,690. All homes West End Alameda - SFD LLC Loop Alameda 94501 Bay For-Sale SFD 285 0 22 Received on 06/10/13 Pulling Permits will be 2-3s. Other resi types planned but not incl in this entry. 37.7878 -122.281 278 resi units+285k shop ctr anchored by Target. Target opened 2275 Mariner Square Urban East Site Approvals Under Oct13, add'l commercial U/C; stores expected to open 2014. Resi Alameda Landing Catellus Loop Alameda 94501 Bay Both Mixed 254 24 72 Received on 06/10/13 Construction portion in plan check as of survey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors Will Be Held at 9:00 A.M
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS’ REGULAR MEETING March 3, 2004 A meeting of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors will be held at 9:00 a.m. at the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District’s (BART) Lake Merritt Headquarters, located at 800 Madison in the First Floor Board Room, Oakland, California. Questions About an Agenda Item The name, telephone number and e-mail of the appropriate staff person to contact for additional information or to resolve concerns is listed for each agenda item. Meeting Procedures The public meeting of the Air District Board of Directors begins at 9:00 a.m. The Board of Directors generally will consider items in the order listed on the agenda. However, any item may be considered in any order. After action on any agenda item not requiring a public hearing, the Board may reconsider or amend the item at any time during the meeting. Telegraph San Pablo To I-580 To I-580 18th 17th Lake 17th Merritt 16th 15th 15th 980 14th Lakeside 13th 12th P 11th 10th 9th Martin Luther King, Jr. Way Castro 8th 7th 6th To San Francisco880 To San José 5th 4th Oak Clay I-880 freeway Alice Franklin Jackson Webster Harrison to Bay Bridge 3rd Madison Jefferson and Broadway San Francisco 2nd Washington C.L. Dellums (Oakland) Amtrak Station Embarcadero N Oakland Inner Harbor Berkeley Amtrak Station Public Transit Access 80 (Emeryville) 24 BART: Lake Merritt Station on the Fremont Line 580 13 AC Transit: Lines 59, 59A, 62 (weekends) San Francisco Bay Bridge 880 Oakland Lines 11, 59, 59A, 62, 35X, 36X (weekdays) 980 Amtrak: C.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Item 9A Informational Presentation on SWL 351 Development Criteria
    MEMORANDUM May 22, 2008 TO: MEMBERS, PORT COMMISSION Hon. Kimberly Brandon, President Hon. Rodney Fong Vice President Hon. Ann Lazarus Hon. Michael Hardeman Hon. Stephanie Shakofsky FROM: Monique A. Moyer Executive Director SUBJECT: Informational Presentation on Development Criteria for SWL 351 (The Embarcadero at Washington Street) DIRECTOR’S RECOMMENDATION: Discussion Item, No Action Requested EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Seawall Lot 351 (“SWL 351”) is one of the development opportunities in San Francisco created by removal of the Embarcadero Freeway after the 1989 earthquake. The parcel is a nearly triangular site with a 358-foot frontage along The Embarcadero Roadway with a mere 26-foot frontage on Washington Street. (See Exhibit A, Site Map.) In the context of San Francisco, this 27,937 square foot lot has potential for effective development. At its December 11, 2007 meeting, the Port Commission received an informational presentation by San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC (“SFWP”) of its proposed 8 Washington project, a mixed-use condominium development.1 The proposed project site, as currently conceived, includes a privately owned 2.5 acre property within the Golden Gateway area and the adjacent Port-owned SWL 351 located at Washington Street and The Embarcadero. This unsolicited development proposal has raised questions about the Port’s long-term land use and development plans for SWL 351. The Port’s Waterfront Land Use Plan (“Waterfront Plan”) identifies development parameters and acceptable land uses for SWL 351 and also notes the 1 The Port has not responded to SFWP’s proposal; rather the Port is engaging in a public process before considering any land transaction involving SWL 351.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Station Profiles
    2015 BART Station Profile Study Station Profiles – Non-Home Origins STATION PROFILES – NON-HOME ORIGINS This section contains a summary sheet for selected BART stations, based on data from customers who travel to the station from non-home origins, like work, school, etc. The selected stations listed below have a sample size of at least 200 non-home origin trips: • 12th St. / Oakland City Center • Glen Park • 16th St. Mission • Hayward • 19th St. / Oakland • Lake Merritt • 24th St. Mission • MacArthur • Ashby • Millbrae • Balboa Park • Montgomery St. • Civic Center / UN Plaza • North Berkeley • Coliseum • Oakland International Airport (OAK) • Concord • Powell St. • Daly City • Rockridge • Downtown Berkeley • San Bruno • Dublin / Pleasanton • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) • Embarcadero • San Leandro • Fremont • Walnut Creek • Fruitvale • West Dublin / Pleasanton Maps for these stations are contained in separate PDF files at www.bart.gov/stationprofile. The maps depict non-home origin points of customers who use each station, and the points are color coded by mode of access. The points are weighted to reflect average weekday ridership at the station. For example, an origin point with a weight of seven will appear on the map as seven points, scattered around the actual point of origin. Note that the number of trips may appear underrepresented in cases where multiple trips originate at the same location. The following summary sheets contain basic information about each station’s weekday non-home origin trips, such as: • absolute number of entries and estimated non-home origin entries • access mode share • trip origin types • customer demographics. Additionally, the total number of car and bicycle parking spaces at each station are included for context.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A
    DATE: July 11, 2013 TO: Historic Preservation Commissioners FROM: Daniel A. Sider, Planning Department Staff RE: Market Analysis of the Sale of Publicly Owned TDR In May 2012, Planning Department (“Department”) Staff provided the Historic Preservation Commission (“HPC”) an informational presentation on the City’s Transferable Development Rights (“TDR”) program. In February 2013, the Department retained Seifel Consulting, Inc. and C.H. Elliott & Associates (jointly, “Consultants”) to perform a market analysis informing a possible sale of TDR from City-owned properties. The resulting work product (“Report”) was delivered to the Department in late June. This memo and the attached Report are intended to provide the HPC with relevant follow-up information from the May 2012 hearing. The City’s TDR Program Since the mid-1980’s, the Planning Department has administered a TDR program (“Program”) through which certain historic properties can sell their unused development rights to certain non- historic properties. The program emerged from the 1985 Downtown Plan in response to unprecedented office growth, housing impacts, transportation impacts and the loss of historic buildings. The key goal of the Program is to maintain Downtown’s development potential while protecting historic resources. The metric that underpins the Program is Floor Area Ratio ("FAR"), which is the ratio of a building’s gross square footage to that of the parcel on which it sits. Under the Program, a Landmark, Significant, or Contributory building can sell un-built FAR capacity to a non-historic property which can then use it to supplement its base FAR allowance. TDRs can only be used to increase FAR within applicable height and bulk controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Property Trust, Inc. Essex Portfolio, L.P
    Section 1: 10-K (10-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (MARK ONE) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___________ to _____________ Commission file number: 001-13106 (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) Commission file number: 333-44467-01 (Essex Portfolio, L.P.) ESSEX PROPERTY TRUST, INC. ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Maryland 77-0369576 (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) California 77-0369575 (Essex Portfolio, L.P.) (Essex Portfolio, L.P.) (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 1100 Park Place, Suite 200 San Mateo, California 94403 (Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code) (650) 655-7800 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Trading Title of each class Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, $.0001 par value (Essex Property Trust, Inc.) ESS New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Essex Property Trust, Inc. Yes ☒ No ☐ Essex Portfolio, L.P. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Update
    City Manager’s 3 Weekly Update March 9, 2016 U P C O M I N G To: City Council M EETINGS From: Chris Zapata, City Manager 2016 Mark Your Calendar 3/14 City Council Work Session, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers “Big Read” Guest Speaker Featuring Julie M. Rivett (Attached) th 3/21 City Council Meeting Sat., Mar. 12 , 2:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m., Main Library, 300 Estudillo 7:00 p.m., Council Ave. Chambers Join Julie M. Rivett, a Dashiell Hammett Scholar and 3/28 State of the City, 6:30 granddaughter to Samuel Dashiell Hammett, for a lively discussion that p.m., Senior Community Center explores the links between her grandfather and his most famous fictional creation. The event is free and open to the public and no prior registration 4/4 City Council Meeting 7:00p.m., Council is required. Chambers 4/11 Water Pollution Control Plant Open House, 4:00 Color Up San Leandro: A Run for Fun (Attached) p.m.- 6:00 p.m. Sat., Mar. 12th, 10:00 a.m., San Leandro Marina, 14001 Monarch 4/18 City Council Meeting Bay Dr. 7:00 p.m., Council The Youth Advisory Commission (YAC) will host its annual Chambers “Color Up San Leandro: A Run for Fun” at the San Leandro Marina. 4/25 Informal Gathering 6:15 Participants will be showered in non-toxic, vibrant colored powder as p.m. they complete a lap around the marina. People of all ages and fitness City/SLUSD/SLUZD Joint Work Session, levels are encouraged to attend.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart at Twenty: Land Use and Development Impacts
    ffional Development BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with research assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich July 1995 University of California at Berkeley - 1 BART@20: Land Use and Development Impacts Robert Cervero with Research Assistance by Carlos Castellanos, Wicaksono Sarosa, and Kenneth Rich This paper was produced with support provided by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the California State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) through the University of California Transportation Center. University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development Table of Contents ONE: BART at 20: An Analysis of Land Use Impacts 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1 TWO: Research Approach and Data Sources 3 THREE: Employment and Population Changes in BART and Non-BART Areas 6 3.1. Population Changes 6 3.2. Employment Changes 3.3. Population Densities 15 3.4. Employment Densities 15 3.5. Summary 20 FOUR: Land Use Changes Over Time and by Corridor 21 4.1. General Land-Use Trends 23 4.2. Pre-BART versus Post-BART 25 4.3. Early versus Later BART 30 4.4. Trends in Non-Residential Densities 33 4.4. Summary 37 FIVE: Land-Use Changes by Station Classes 38 5.1. Grouping Variables 38 5.2. Classification 38 5.3. Station Classes 41 5.4. Trends in Residential and Non-Residential Growth Among Station Classes 44 5.5. Percent Growth in Early- versus Later-BART Years Among Station Classes 46 5.6. Trends in Non-Residential Densities Among Station Classes 46 SLX: Matched-Pair Comparisons of Land-Use Changes near BART Stations Versus Freeway Interchanges 51 6.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Are Being Reported Throughout All of San Francisco and     What the City Is Doing to Resolve Them
    NO. 160 PUBLISHED BY THE CENTRAL CITY A telling tale SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER October of challenges 2 015 for housing 4,400 in The City UNITS IN 1400 Mission began as 25 YEARS low-income, but city made san francisco it plum for a smart builder Affordable housing built UNK S ENDERLOIN OOTS BY M ARJORIE BEGGS P ‘ T R since 1989 T WAS A SWEET BIT of chronologi- cal serendipity: In August, the city an- PAGE 3 I nounced the moderate-income lottery winners who were eligible to buy 167 condos at the new, glass-clad 1400 Mission complex at the corner of 10th Street. Two miles east, at Folsom and Main streets, the first owners began moving into Lumina, 656 super-luxe condos. The connection between the two is direct, the timing’s not coincidental, the backstory convoluted — and telling. Tishman Speyer built 1400 Mission for $65 million and Lumina for $620 million. One is inclusionary affordable housing, the other, by dint of price, exclusionary. With the exception of 23 rental apartments at 1400 Mission, all 823 condos are for sale. How much Tishman will profit from Lumina will probably be known only to Tishman Speyer. At 1400 Mission, the city 2 WHO has posted estimated sales totals for the WERE The city credited Tishman 167 condos at just nearly $50 million for under $50 million. So MOURNED meeting its inclusionary it may be fair to ask if Deosia Henderson, requirement. the big developer has used an affordable Stevie L. Newsom housing project to en- able its lucrative investment in the Lumina.
    [Show full text]
  • Bart Core System Parking Analysis
    Silicon Valley Rapid Transit Corridor Final EIR CHAPTER 5.0: BART CORE SYSTEM PARKING ANALYSIS 5.1 INTRODUCTION The “core system” represents those stations on the existing BART system outside of Santa Clara County. The 16 existing stations include South Alameda County – San Leandro, Bay Fair, Hayward, South Hayward, Union City, and Fremont; East Alameda County – Castro Valley and Dublin/Pleasanton; Oakland/Central Alameda County – MacArthur; North Alameda County/West Contra Costa County – El Cerrito Plaza and El Cerrito Del Norte; and Central and East Contra Costa County – Lafayette, Concord, North Concord/Martinez and Pittsburg/Bay Point. New riders of the BART Alternative may walk, bicycle, use another transit mode, or park and board at one of the BART core system stations and take the train from there to a station along the BART Alternative within Santa Clara County. The number of potential new riders of the BART Alternative would be somewhat limited by the ability of those riders to park and board at core system stations. To achieve the anticipated ridership for the BART Alternative as described in this document, the additional parking demand that would be generated by those new riders must be accommodated. The regional transportation model shows that providing parking for riders who may board at core system stations would require approximately 3,200 spaces in 2025. Parking expansion at the BART core system stations to meet this additional parking demand is an integral part of the BART Alternative. To avoid displacing other users or diverting riders from using the BART system to travel to and from Santa Clara County, VTA will financially support BART in the expansion of parking in the core system by the number of spaces necessary to meet the demand generated by the BART Alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • 1100 Park Place Suite 200 San Mateo California 94403 Telephone 650 655 7800
    APARTMENT COMMUNITIES Real Estate Information as of April 27, 2021 Year Year Property Age of Property Name Address City/State Units Acquired Built Ownership Property NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Santa Clara County The Commons 275 Union Avenue Campbell, CA 264 2010 1973 EPLP 48 Pointe at Cupertino 19920 Olivewood Street Cupertino, CA 116 1998 1963 EPLP 58 Apex 1102 South Abel Street Milpitas, CA 367 2014 2014 EPLP 7 Regency at Mountain View 333 Escuela Avenue Mountain View, CA 142 2013 1970 Wesco III 51 101 San Fernando 99 South Fourth Street San Jose, CA 323 2010 2001 EPLP 20 360 Residences 360 South Market Street San Jose, CA 213 2017 2010 Wesco V11 Bella Villagio 383 Vista Roma Way San Jose, CA 231 2010 2004 EPLP 17 The Carlyle 2909 Nieman Boulevard San Jose, CA 132 2000 2000 BEX II 21 Century Towers 1731 & 1733 North First Street San Jose, CA 376 2017 2017 JV ‐ 50% 4 Enso 175 Baypointe Parkway San Jose, CA 183 2015 2014 EPLP 7 Epic 545 River Oaks Parkway San Jose, CA 769 2013 2013 EPLP 8 Esplanade 350 East Taylor Street San Jose, CA 278 2004 2002 EPLP 19 Fountains at River Oaks 373 River Oaks Circle San Jose, CA 226 2014 1990 EPLP 31 Marquis 817 North 10th Street San Jose, CA 166 2016 2015 EPLP 6 Meridian at Midtown 1432 West San Carlos Street San Jose, CA 218 2018 2015 Wesco V6 Mio 688 North 7th Street San Jose, CA 103 2016 2015 EPLP 6 Patina at Midtown 355 Sunol Street San Jose, CA 269 JV ‐ 50% Palm Valley 150 Palm Valley Road San Jose, CA 1,100 2014 2008 EPLP 13 Sage at Cupertino 175 Calvert Drive San Jose, CA 230 2017 1971 DownREIT 50 The
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years: Downtown Plan Monitoring Report, 1985-2009 03
    YEARS DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT 1 9 8 5 - 2 0 0 9 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE 2011 © 2011 San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-3114 www.sfplanning.org 25 YEARS: DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT 1985-2009 San Francisco Planning Department June 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01 25 Years: Downtown Plan 01 Economic Change and Unexpected Trends 02 Regional Context and What Lies Ahead 02 25 YEARS: DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT, 1985-2009 03 Report Organization 03 PART I: THE DOWNTOWN PLAN: GOALS ACHIEVED 05 Introduction 05 Space for Commerce 08 New Commercial Construction Downtown 08 Downtown Commercial Space Today 10 Space for Housing 12 New Housing Downtown 12 Jobs Housing Linkage Program (JHLP) 14 Protecting Existing Housing Downtown 16 Downtown Housing Today 17 Open Space 18 Downtown Open Space Today 20 Historic Preservation 21 Downtown Historic Preservation Today 21 Urban Form 23 Downtown Urban Form Today 24 Moving About – Transportation 25 Downtown Transportation Today 26 PART II: ECONOMIC CHANGE AND REGIONAL GROWTH SINCE 1985 27 San Francisco Employment Change – from Office to Other Activities 28 Sole Proprietors – Shift from Large to Smaller Employers 28 Downtown Area Employment – A Change in Location 33 Downtown C-3 Zone Employment Change 33 Downtown San Francisco in a Regional Context: What Lies Ahead? 34 San Francisco and the Region 34 The Downtown Plan Today and Tomorrow 35 APPENDICES Appendix A: Downtown Plan Objectives 37 Appendix B: Table 1: New Office
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Programs, Tariffs, and Rulemaking 13-11-007 Policies. (Filed November 14, 2013) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY (U902E) NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE-GRID INTEGRATION PILOT PROGRAM (“POWER YOUR DRIVE”) SEMI-ANNUAL REPORT has been electronically mailed to each party of record on the service list in R.13-11-007. SDG&E is unable to serve the report to A.14- 04-014 because that service list has been closed. Any party on the service list who has not provided an electronic mail address was served by placing a copy in a properly addressed and sealed envelope and depositing such envelope in the United States Mail with first-class postage prepaid. A copy was also sent via Federal Express to the Assigned Administrative Law Judge in this proceeding. Executed this 6th day of September 2016 at San Diego, California /s/ Tamara Grabowski Tamara Grabowski CPUC - Service Lists - R1311007 Page 1 of 15 CPUC Home CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Service Lists PROCEEDING: R1311007 - CPUC - OIR TO CONSID FILER: CPUC LIST NAME: LIST LAST CHANGED: AUGUST 19, 2016 Download the Comma-delimited File About Comma-delimited Files Back to Service Lists Index Parties CAMERON SEAN GRAY JEREMY WAEN ENERGY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGER SR. REGULATORY ANALYST COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL MARIN CLEAN ENERGY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 EMAIL ONLY, CA 00000 FOR: COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL FOR: MARIN CLEAN ENERGY JOHN BOESEL JOHN W.
    [Show full text]