DOCSLIB.ORG

Multifamily Development Pipeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Multifamily Development Pipeline ID PROJECT CITY UNITS BAY AREA ID PROJECT CITY UNITS 1 Amero - 1501 Filbert Street San Francisco 27 55 1500 Newell Ave - The Village Mixed Use Walnut Creek 49 2 1645 Pacific Avenue San Francisco 39 Multifamily Development Pipeline 56 651 Addison Street - Archstone Berkeley on Addison Berkeley 94 3 Marlow - 1800 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco 98 57 64th and Christie - Marketplace Development Emeryville 193 4 2655 Bush Street San Francisco 81 Projects >25 units scheduled for delivery by 2016 58 1225 Powell Street - Archstone Parkside Emeryville 180 5 1450 Franklin Street San Francisco 69 59 Powell, Hollis, and Doyle Street - Parkside Apartments Emeryviile 168 6 1465 Pine Street San Francisco 35 60 3501 San Pablo Ave - California Hotel Oakland 137 7 1080 Sutter Street San Francisco 35 61 MacArthur BART Transit Village Oakland 624 8 Trinity Place (Phase III) San Francisco 550 2126 M L King Jr Way, 616 21st St, 620 21st St 62 Oakland 100 9 235 Broadway San Francisco 75 Cathedral Gardens 10 Mission Bay - Block 11 San Francisco 190 63 460 Grand Ave Oakland 68 11 181 Fremont Street San Francisco 74 64 Brooklyn Basin Oakland 3100 12 Plaza A - 318 Main Street San Francisco 59 65 7100 Mountain Boulevard - Monte Vista Villas Oakland 167 13 Lumina - 201 Folsom Street San Francisco 669 66 4700 Norris Canyon Rd - Park Central San Ramon 116 14 Transbay Blocks 6 & 7 - 299 Fremont San Francisco 409 67 6617 Dublin Blvd - Tralee Dublin 233 15 340 Fremont Street San Francisco 348 68 800 & 888 N San Mateo Dr San Mateo 155 16 Tower B - 301 Beale Street San Francisco 285 69 Delaware St - Bay Meadows San Mateo 392 17 333 Fremont Street San Francisco 83 70 220 West 20th Ave and 1950 Elkhorn Court San Mateo 197 18 One Rincon Hill - 425 1st Street (Phase II) San Francisco 299 71 1990 & 2000 Delaware St San Mateo 120 19 45 Lansing Street San Francisco 320 72 2090 Delaware St San Mateo 111 20 72 Townsend Street San Francisco 74 73 650 Veterans Blvd Redwood City 264 21 870 Harrison Street San Francisco 26 74 333 Main St Redwood City 132 22 260 5th Street San Francisco 181 75 201 Marshall Redwood City 116 23 Mosso - 900 Folsom Street San Francisco 282 76 145 Monroe St Redwood City 305 24 The Wilson - 973 Market Street San Francisco 65 77 2580 El Camino Real Redwood City 141 25 121 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco 720 78 Central Park Terrace Fremont 145 26 AVA-55 Ninth Street San Francisco 273 79 42100 Blacow Rd - Lunare Townhomes Fremont 38 27 The Panoramic - 1321 Mission Street San Francisco 160 80 801 Alma Street - Palo Alto Family Palo Alto 50 28 1400 Mission Street San Francisco 190 81 195 Page Mill Rd - Park Plaza Palo Alto 82 29 1415 Mission Street San Francisco 117 82 455 San Antonio Road - Village at San Antonio Center Mountain View 330 30 100 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco 399 83 2650 El Camino Real Mountain View 193 31 400 Grove San Francisco 34 84 111 N. Rengstorff Ave Mountain View 134 32 Parcel P - 427 Fell Street San Francisco 182 85 135 Franklin Street - Franklin Street Family Mountain View 51 33 307 Octavia Street San Francisco 182 86 865 El Camino Real - Lennar Apartments Mountain View 150 34 8 Octavia San Francisco 47 87 455 West Evelyn Mountain View 203 35 55 Laguna Street San Francisco 440 88 209 Evelyn Ave - Station 361 Mountain View 65 36 Linea - 1998 Market Street San Francisco 115 89 175 Washington Avenue - Solstice Sunnyvale 280 37 25-35 Dolores Street San Francisco 37 90 2525 El Camino Real Santa Clara 48 38 2175 Market Street San Francisco 88 91 388 Santana Row - Santana Row San Jose 212 39 Mission Garden Apart-1880 Misson Street San Francisco 202 92 Ascent San Jose 650 40 1501 15th Street San Francisco 40 93 345 Stockton Avenue - Avalon Morrison Park San Jose 250 41 Mission Bay - Block 13 East San Francisco 272 94 Centerra San Jose 347 42 1180 4th Street San Francisco 150 95 One South Market San Jose 312 43 Arden-Mission Bay, Block 12 San Francisco 273 96 825 N. 10th St - Marquis San Jose 160 44 Venue - Mission Bay Block 3 West San Francisco 147 97 60 E Rosemary Street - 1st and Rosemary San Jose 184 45 3rd St Apart-2121 3rd Street San Francisco 106 98 30 E Rosemary Street - 1st and Rosemary San Jose 106 46 2121 Third Street San Francisco 105 99 320 Crescent Village Circle - Crescent Village V San Jose 321 47 Vida SF - 2558 Mission Street San Francisco 114 100 555 River Oaks Pkwy - Epic San Jose 769 48 Hunters Point - Block 54 San Francisco 66 101 320 Crescent Village Circle - Crescent Village II San Jose 370 49 Hunters Point - Block 56-57 San Francisco 98 102 3469 N 1st Street - Riverview I San Jose 271 50 Hunters Point - Block 53 San Francisco 93 103 81 Vista Montana - Vista Montana San Jose 444 51 Block 51 - 101 Donohue Street San Francisco 60 104 320 Crescent Village Circle - Crescent Village III San Jose 357 52 141 N Civic Dr - BRIO Apartments Walnut Creek 300 105 3700 Casa Verde Way - Verdant (The) San Jose 498 53 1960 N Main St - North Main Apartments Walnut Creek 126 106 175 Baypointe Pkwy San Jose 183 54 1500 North California Blvd Walnut Creek 141 107 3401 Iron Pointe Drive San Jose 293 108 320 Crescent Village Circle - Crescent Village IV San Jose 322.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Residential Development Pipeline
    36 SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES JUNE 26, 2015 37 SAN FRANCISCO STRUCTURES SPECIAL REPORT Columbus Ave. The Embarcadero 52 SPONSORED BY Broadway Pacific Ave. Kearny St. PLANNED Stockton St. RESIDENTIAL Jackson St. Powell St. Montgomery St. SAN FRANCISCO Polk St. 80 Project name, address Developer Done Units Sale/ Market/ Sacramento St. rental affordable NP 1654 Sunnydale Ave. Mercy Housing California, Related Cos. 2018+ 1,700 both both 34 40 78 106 DEVELOPMENT 14 Pine St. 77 Potrero Terrace, 1095 Connecticut St. Bridge Housing Corp. 2018 1,400- both both California St. Bush St. 60 7 85 71 58 Sutter St. Spear St. 1,700 79 8 1 Main St. Mission Rock, Seawall Lot 227 and SWL 337 Associates LLC (S.F. Giants) 2017+ 1,500 TBD both Gough St. 112 35 80 5 Beale St. 72 Laguna St. 113 Webster St. Pier 48 38 Fremont St. Steiner St. Geary Blvd. 90 33 Pier 70 residential Forest City 2029 1,000- both both Divisadero St. 55 48 73 KEY 95 118 107 10 2,000 PIPELINE 2nd St. NP: Not placed; outside map area 96 Market St. 103 Van Ness Ave. 64 Ellis St. 62 61 74 700 Innes St. Build Inc. 2020 980 rent market Market: A majority of units are market rate, 29 94 1st St. Residential projects in 75 10 S. Van Ness Ave. Crescent Heights 2018+ 767 TBD market though almost all projects include some affordable Geary Blvd. Mission St. 97 San Francisco of 60 units units to comply with city regulations Turk St. 102 76 5M at Fifth and Mission Streets Forest City / Hearst Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bay Area-Silicon Valley and Australia an Expanding Trans-Pacific Partnership
    The Bay Area-Silicon Valley and Australia An Expanding Trans-Pacific Partnership December 2020 Acknowledgments This report was developed in partnership with the Odette Hampton, Trade and Investment Commissioner American Chamber of Commerce in Australia, with and Deputy Consul General, Australian Trade and support from Cisco, Google, Lendlease, Salesforce, Investment Commission (Austrade) Telstra, University of Technology Sydney, and Wipro. Joe Hockey, Founding Partner and President, Bondi Development of the project was led by Sean Randolph, Partners, Australian Ambassador to the US, 2016–2020 Senior Director at the Bay Area Council Economic Institute. Neils Erich, a consultant to the Institute, Vikas Jain, Asia-Pacific Business Head for Engineering, was co-author. The Institute wishes to thank April Construction and Mining, Wipro Palmerlee, Chief Executive Officer of the American Claire Johnston, Managing Director, Google Chamber of Commerce in Australia, for her support Development Ventures, Lendlease throughout this effort and the following individuals for Joe Kaesshaefer, Trade and Investment Commissioner– their valuable input: USA, Department of Industry, New South Wales Jeff Bleich, Chief Legal Officer, Cruise, US Ambassador Michael Kapel, Trade and Investment Commissioner to to Australia 2009–2013 the Americas in San Francisco, Government of Victoria Michael Blumenstein, Associate Dean, Research Damian Kassabgi, Executive Vice President, Public Strategy and Management, Faculty of Engineering Policy and Communications, Afterpay and
    [Show full text]
  • June 2016 San Francisco Residential Development
    SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT JUNE 2016 NAVIGATION Click page numbers to be taken directly to page NEWS & MARKET CURRENTLY HIGHLIGHTS PERFORMANCE SELLING NEWS AND HIGHLIGHTS MARKET PERFORMANCE CURRENTLY SELLING Median $/SqFt Currently Year-Over-Year Month-Over-Month CURRENTLY SELLING... Luxe New Condominiump. $1,218/SqFt + 15% p. + 2% p. Nearly half of second phase is under contract. Price per square foot3 is 4 1650 Broadway at Van5 Ness | Pacific Heights Shipyard’s Resale Condominium $1,042/SqFt + 11% + 2% averaging approximately $760. The first phase averaged approximately $660 per Status: 34 units available/0 in-contract/0 closed square foot. New Apartment $5.10/SqFt + 7% N/A Pre-sale: August 2015 Closings anticipated: Q1 2016 Less than 100 units remain available at The Rockwell. Current absorption surpasses Project info: 34 units, 7-stories, 34 parking spaces 30 units a month. NEW CONDOMINIUM PRICING & VOLUME Developer: Belrich Partners Sales are expected to commence this month at the second phase of Onyx , consisting Architect: Forum Design of 21 condominiums. Median Price & Closing Volume Interior Design: Edmonds + Lee Features & Finishes: Marble tile and zinc facade, Floor- Closings have commenced at Lumina’s Plaza A. Price per square$1,200,000 foot is averaging 180 approximately $1,500. to-ceiling windows, Bay and Golden Gate views, Studio 160 Click development to be taken directly to page $1,000,000 Becker Cabinetry, Mobile kitchen islands, Caesarstone 140 Most Recent Quarter countertops, Subzero refrigerators, Thermador ap- $800,000ONE FRANKLIN 181 FREMONT ONE120 MISSION BAY THE HARRISONpliances, Uline THE wine coolers, PACIFIC Duravit and Hansgrohe 100 Median: $1,000,000 PROPOSED..
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Are Being Reported Throughout All of San Francisco and     What the City Is Doing to Resolve Them
    NO. 160 PUBLISHED BY THE CENTRAL CITY A telling tale SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER October of challenges 2 015 for housing 4,400 in The City UNITS IN 1400 Mission began as 25 YEARS low-income, but city made san francisco it plum for a smart builder Affordable housing built UNK S ENDERLOIN OOTS BY M ARJORIE BEGGS P ‘ T R since 1989 T WAS A SWEET BIT of chronologi- cal serendipity: In August, the city an- PAGE 3 I nounced the moderate-income lottery winners who were eligible to buy 167 condos at the new, glass-clad 1400 Mission complex at the corner of 10th Street. Two miles east, at Folsom and Main streets, the first owners began moving into Lumina, 656 super-luxe condos. The connection between the two is direct, the timing’s not coincidental, the backstory convoluted — and telling. Tishman Speyer built 1400 Mission for $65 million and Lumina for $620 million. One is inclusionary affordable housing, the other, by dint of price, exclusionary. With the exception of 23 rental apartments at 1400 Mission, all 823 condos are for sale. How much Tishman will profit from Lumina will probably be known only to Tishman Speyer. At 1400 Mission, the city 2 WHO has posted estimated sales totals for the WERE The city credited Tishman 167 condos at just nearly $50 million for under $50 million. So MOURNED meeting its inclusionary it may be fair to ask if Deosia Henderson, requirement. the big developer has used an affordable Stevie L. Newsom housing project to en- able its lucrative investment in the Lumina.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years: Downtown Plan Monitoring Report, 1985-2009 03
    YEARS DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT 1 9 8 5 - 2 0 0 9 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE 2011 © 2011 San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-3114 www.sfplanning.org 25 YEARS: DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT 1985-2009 San Francisco Planning Department June 2011 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 01 25 Years: Downtown Plan 01 Economic Change and Unexpected Trends 02 Regional Context and What Lies Ahead 02 25 YEARS: DOWNTOWN PLAN MONITORING REPORT, 1985-2009 03 Report Organization 03 PART I: THE DOWNTOWN PLAN: GOALS ACHIEVED 05 Introduction 05 Space for Commerce 08 New Commercial Construction Downtown 08 Downtown Commercial Space Today 10 Space for Housing 12 New Housing Downtown 12 Jobs Housing Linkage Program (JHLP) 14 Protecting Existing Housing Downtown 16 Downtown Housing Today 17 Open Space 18 Downtown Open Space Today 20 Historic Preservation 21 Downtown Historic Preservation Today 21 Urban Form 23 Downtown Urban Form Today 24 Moving About – Transportation 25 Downtown Transportation Today 26 PART II: ECONOMIC CHANGE AND REGIONAL GROWTH SINCE 1985 27 San Francisco Employment Change – from Office to Other Activities 28 Sole Proprietors – Shift from Large to Smaller Employers 28 Downtown Area Employment – A Change in Location 33 Downtown C-3 Zone Employment Change 33 Downtown San Francisco in a Regional Context: What Lies Ahead? 34 San Francisco and the Region 34 The Downtown Plan Today and Tomorrow 35 APPENDICES Appendix A: Downtown Plan Objectives 37 Appendix B: Table 1: New Office
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Budget for Phase 1 of the Transbay Transit Center Program (Program) in the Amount of $1,189,000,000 in Year of Expenditure (YOE) Dollars
    THIS STAFF REPORT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO.: 7 FOR THE MEETING OF: November 16, 2007 TRANSBAY JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Recommendation of a Baseline Budget for Phase 1 of the Transbay Transit Center Program (Program) in the amount of $1,189,000,000 in year of expenditure (YOE) dollars. SUMMARY: A preliminary Phase 1 cost estimate totaling $983 million was developed in January 2006 and presented to the Board in March 2006. This preliminary estimate was prepared using conceptual designs and FTA-mandated minimum levels of contingencies, as well as initial estimates of escalation and program-wide costs such as design and construction management. Since the Phase 1 preliminary cost estimate was presented to the Board in March 2006, considerable work has been completed to identify the most probable final cost of Phase 1 as the basis for the recommended Baseline Budget. The estimate was recalculated to account for the escalation that occurred during 2006, and an industry review was conducted to assess the most probable ongoing annual levels of escalation to the end of construction. In addition, adjustments were made to the Phase 1 preliminary cost estimate to account for further scope development, development of intended contracting strategies, and reallocation of some costs from Phase 2. Accordingly, this report provides an update to the components included in the prior estimate and recommends the adoption of a Baseline Budget for Phase 1 of $1,189,000,000 (YOE). Once adopted, this Baseline Budget will be the benchmark against which cost performance will be measured. Staff and consultants have developed a draft funding plan for the Baseline Budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewing Instructions
    Viewing Instructions This file has been indexed or bookmarked to simplify navigation between documents. If you are unable to view the document index, download the file to your local drive and open it using your PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader). SUPPLEMENT DATED AUGUST 24, 2012 to OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED AUGUST 14, 2012 Relating to $251,100,000 $38,265,000 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS SERIES 2012D SERIES 2012E This Supplement, dated August 24, 2012 (the "Supplement"), supplements and amends the Official Statement, dated August 14, 2012 (the "Official Statement"), relating to the above-captioned Bonds, as described below. Capitalized terms used herein shall have the definitions provided in the Official Statement. The following new paragraph is added following the “Sources and Uses of Funds” table on page 9 of the Official Statement: In connection with the purchase of the 2012D Bonds, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (“CGMI”) has advised the City that CGMI acted as agent for its affiliate, Citibank, N.A., as direct purchaser of the 2012D Bonds and that, as agent, CGMI receives no underwriter’s discount or other compensation for such service. Accordingly, CGMI, for its purposes, allocated the full amount of underwriter’s discount to the 2012E Bonds. The City’s policy with respect to a combined sale of different series of Bonds is to allocate costs of issuance of all series of the Bonds on a pro rata basis among the series, and such allocation is reflected in the table above.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 1995 204 NUMB: Chief Criticizes POA Negotiations Update Byalthgueiro Ties Reach Agreement
    I II Member of COPS California Organization of Police & Sheriffs !1 SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATI( To Promote the Ideals, Policies and Accomplishments of the Association and its Members VOLUME 27 - SAN FRANCISCO, AUGUST 1995 204 NUMB: Chief Criticizes POA Negotiations Update byAlThgueiro ties reach agreement. The City Challenge to "Provisionals" Charger provides for binding interest iegouauoris nave been taking arbitration for police officers, Chief Ribera has been making the single individual to determine who place between the City and POA ne- firefighters and other city employ- rounds recently telling members that gets a particular job and who does gotiating committees since June 14, ees. In a nutshell, that means that if the 21 provisional sergeant appoint- not, without a competitive examina- 1995. The process takes a great deal an agreement cannot be reached, an ments he announced, effective Au- tion of some sort. There needn't be of time and requires patience and impasse is declared. A mediator/ gust 26, 1995, are really good for the any provisional appointments at all. care. Provisions will be implemented arbitrator is then selected and if the department and that the POA is our Regular examinations should be con- as a result of these negotiations which parties still can't reach agreement, of line for criticizing them. ducted and, if they were, there would will have a very significant impact on the arbitrator is required to decide These 21 "provisional" appoint- always be eligible lists from which to the wages, hours and working condi- the issues in dispute on an issue by ments are not the first the Chief has appoint members who passed ap- tions of San Francisco's police offic- issue basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Plan Exemption Checklist
    Community Plan Exemption Checklist Case No.: 2013.0973E Project Address: 150 Van Ness Avenue 155 Hayes Street 101 Hayes Street/69 Polk Street 131-135 Hayes Street 125 Hayes Street Zoning: C-3-G (Downtown General Commercial) Use District Van Ness and Market Downtown Residential Special Use District 120-R-2 Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 0814/001, 014, 015, 016, and 021 Lot Size: Five lots totaling 46,490 square feet (approximately 1.07 acres) Plan Area: Market and Octavia Area Plan Project Sponsor: Marc Babsin, Emerald Fund – (415) 489-1313 [email protected] Staff Contact: Sandy Ngan – (415) 575-9102 [email protected] PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Location The project site is located at the edge of the Downtown/Civic Center neighborhood and the project area is characterized by office and institutional uses, residential uses, and neighborhood commercial uses, including restaurants, bars, cafés, hotels, fitness studios, and a variety of retail establishments. The project site is located on five parcels (Assessor’s Block 0814; Lots 001, 014, 015, 016, and 021) bordered by Hayes Street to the north, Polk Street to the east, adjacent properties to the south, and Van Ness Avenue to the west. The five parcels comprising the project site total 46,490 square feet in size (approximately 1.07 acres) and are located in a C-3-G (Downtown General) Zoning District, the Van Ness and Market Downtown Residential Special Use District, and a 120-R-2 Height and Bulk District, within the Market and Octavia Area Plan. The project site is currently occupied by a vacant office development (150 Van Ness Avenue, a seven- story, 95-foot-tall building on Lot 014, and 155 Hayes Street, an eight-story, 108-foot-tall building addition to the 150 Van Ness Avenue building, on Lot 015) totaling 149,049 square feet and four surface parking lots (Lots 001, 015, 016, and 021) with 99 off-street parking spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco
    The Mark Company Standard Monthly Reports San Francisco May 2013 Contents Executive Summary Currently Selling Developments Resale Developments Pipeline Report TMC Disclaimer Notes 1) Currently Selling is defined as a new construction residential project selling for the first time or a project in which units have never been lived in as owner-occupied. 2) Resale is defined as a residential unit that has been sold at least once before and has previously been lived in. 3) This report covers Currently Selling residential developments with 20+ Market Rate units and Resale residential developments with 50+ Market Rate units located in Districts 7, 8 and 9. 4) Assume that projects located in the Currently Selling section are actively selling units unless noted otherwise. 5) Date On Market refers to the date the Sales Center opened. 6) Average Absorption is calculated from Date On Market through the first of the month prior to the date of the report. It accounts for units both in contract and closed. 7) Average Price/SF is calculated using only units where both square footage and price are known. Average Price/SF is defined as the average price divided by the average square footage. Averages are weighted averages. 8) Developments are considered Sold Out once the last Market Rate unit has closed OR there have been six months without a closing, all units are in contract and the Sales Center is closed (e.g. there is no active marketing). At that point, projects will be moved to the Resale section and tracked for resale closings. 9) Market Rate Units Available in the Pipeline Report refers to the estimated number of Market Rate units available for sale at the development (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt2p30342b No online items Finding Aid to the San Francisco Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL Finding aid prepared by David Krah, Stephanie Walls, and California Ephemera Project staff; updated by San Francisco History Center staff. The California Ephemera Project was funded by a Cataloging Hidden Special Collections and Archives grant from the Council on Library and Information Resources in 2009-2010. San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library 100 Larkin Street San Francisco, CA 94102 [email protected] URL: http://www.sfpl.org/sfhistory 2010, revised January 2020 Finding Aid to the San Francisco SF SUB COLL 1 Ephemera Collection SF SUB COLL Title: San Francisco ephemera collection Date (inclusive): 1850-present Identifier/Call Number: SF SUB COLL Physical Description: 265.0 Linear feet(in 153 file drawers) Contributing Institution: San Francisco History Center, San Francisco Public Library 100 Larkin Street San Francisco, CA 94102 415-557-4567 [email protected] URL: http://sfpl.org/sfhistory Abstract: Consists of ephemeral materials, city records and clippings relating to the city of San Francisco and its citizens. Materials date from the 1850s to the present, the bulk from the 20th century. Subjects cover a diverse array of San Francisco history and primarily pertain to: municipal government; city planning; urban policy; environmental engineering; transportation; social history; labor history; community relations; notable events; public events, fairs and celebrations; and various aspects of local popular culture. Subjects also relate to specific local entities, such as: businesses; schools, colleges and universities; political parties; and associations, groups and clubs.
    [Show full text]
  • G2. Affordable Housing (Inclusionary) Program
    FY 2009-10 Development Impact Fee Report ’s Office Controller January 24, 2011 City and County of San Francisco City and City and County of San Francisco FY 2009-10 Development Impact Fee Report January 24, 2011 Introduction San Francisco Planning Code Article 2, Section 409(b) requires the Controller to issue an Annual Citywide Development Fee and Development Impact Requirements Report including: All development fees collected during the prior fiscal year, organized by development fee account; All cumulative monies collected and expended over the life of each fee; The number of projects that elected to satisfy development impact requirements through in-kind improvements; Any annual construction cost inflation adjustments to fees (based on the Annual Infrastructure Construction Cost Inflation Estimate published by the Office of the City Administrator's Capital Planning Group); and Other information required pursuant to the California Mitigation Fee Act Government Code 66001, including: fee rate and description; the beginning and ending balance of the fee account; the amount of fees collected and interest earned; an identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the percentage of the cost of the improvement funded with fees; an approximate construction start date; and a description of any transfers or loans made from the account.1 Table 1 lists the City’s twenty-four development impact fees, the department or agency collecting and administering each one, and other fee details as of November 2, 2010. On December 6, 2010, several fee levels were adjusted for consistency to reflect gross square feet instead of net square feet.
    [Show full text]