<<

AUDIO engineering society Containing the Activities and Papers of the Society, and pub- lished monthly as a part of AUDIO ENGINEERING Magazine OFFICERS VJ . G. McProud ...... President Lloyd C. Wingard Central Vice-Pres. P. 0. Box 12, Old Chelsea Sta., F. Sumner Hall Executive Vice-Pres. H. M. Tremaine Western Vice-Pres. New York 11, N. Y. C. 1. LeBel ...... Secretary Ralph A. Schlegel ...... Treasurer Magnetic Audio Fundamentals

A. M. VINCENT*

Challenging the electron tube in its well established position as the basic amplifier com- ponent, the magnetic principles invoked offer a promising field of new development.

LECTRONIC ENGINEERS are beginning The transistor has been thoroughly de- to accept the fact that competitors scribed in numerous publications. Di- E to the electron tube are not only a electric amplifier fundamental data has reality but are here to stay. The Bureau recently been assembled and published in of Ships is interested in these devices the Bureau's monthly periodical "Ehc- primarily because of their reliability and Material is' now being prepared long life compared to that of the electron on the resistance or crystal amplifier. tube. A considerable amount of material has Fig. 1. Basic principle of controlled reactance. The most formidable competitors to The position of the core in the coil is varied. these tubes are transistors, magnetic and been published on magnetic amplifiers, dielectric amplifiers, and more recently, most of which pertained to servo and .. 4 . ' ......

pllner (a semi-conauctor responaing re- uvlla. VCLY LILLIE; uaLa 13 avauauac ~11 sistively to magnetic fields). high-speed applications, with the possi- Presented on November Ist, 1951, at the Third Anwual Convention of the Audio Engiwewing Society. Fig. 2 In the saturable reactot, the core re- mains stationay, but its permeability is varied by a control circuit in which d.c. flows.

LOAD

TUBE AMPLIFIER MAGNETIC AMPLIFIER Fig. 3. The addition of a rectifier in the load (0) (b) I circuit improves performance by eliminating INPUT VOLTAGE self-saturation. , LOAD CURRENT Summary: A brief history of magnetic amplifier development is given, with a preliminary description of the operating principles. Comparisons between elec- tron-tube amplifiers and magnetic ampli- fiers are made, and a number of basic circuits are shown. The advantages and disadvantages with respect to conven- tional tube amplifiers are listed, with indications of future advances in the art.

* Liezltenant Commander, U. S. Navy. RELATIVE CONTROL CLASS*A" SINGLE CLASS *B' PUSH PULL tc) td) paper rests upon the author, and state- I 1' ments contained herein are not binding Fig. 4. (a) Simplified tube amplifier, and (b) simplified magnetic amplifier; (c) chal'acteristic, upon the Audio Engineering Society. Class A showing operation on linear portion of curve; (d) characteristic converted for push-pull operation. AUDIO ENGINEERING SEPTEMBER, 1952 separate winding is used to control the low almost precisely that of a tube, a saturation of a stationary core, as shown theoretical analysis can be made on the in Fig. 2. This would be satisfactory as straight portion of the curve. an amplifier except that the power sen- sitivity would be relatively, low since Analysis of Operation the control ampere-turns must be equal to the load ampere-turns, plus sufficient Figures 4 (a) and (b) are sketches of ampere-turns to control the core. a tube and magnetic amplifier; (c) is a In Fig. 3, a rectifier is inserted in curve showing magnetic saturation vs. Fig. 5. Simplest form of audio amplifier em- series with the load circuit. This elimi- impedance in a magnetic amplifier. Since ploying magnetic principles. nates the negative output-winding cur- this curve almost duplicates that of cer- rent pulses that drive the core away from tain type tubes, operating characteristics saturation which would require a greater of both can be plotted on the same curve. cancelling control-winding current. This For a fair comparison the "plate" supply is referred to as self-saturation. Self- of both amplifiers must be a.c., for a saturation is not the inclusion of positive magnetic amplifier will not control d.c. feedback, but the elimination of negative If this amplifier is to be used to amplify feedback whereby the control current for audio , the supply frequency a given output voltage is made indepen- should be above audibility-at least three dent of the output current. Because of times the highest frequency to be con- the increased power sensitivity, self- trolled. Since both amplifiers are single saturation circuits are usually considered ended, they must be operated as class A, for audio applications. half way up the slope, as shown in curve In order to understand the principles (c), point a. The operation analysis then involved in audio frequency, a rough follows along the lines of a class A tube analogy between a tube and a magnetic amplifier. Fig. 6. Single-stage audio amplifie~capable of amplifier should be made. Any attempt These amplifiers working as class A gains up to several hundred. would not only be inefficient, but pro- visions would have to be made to sepa- ble exception of some special magnetic rate the carrier from the voice fre- computer circuits, responding to im- quencies; consequently they would be pulses up to 400 kc. Only minor explora- normally operated class AB push-pull. tory tests have been made with magnetic With this connection the carrier can be circuits at audio and radio frequencies. biased out, as indicated by point b in (c). These tests showed that gains of over This makes it possible to use coils and 100 per stage can be obtained at audio rectifiers of lower capacity. (In ma- frequencies and at radio frequencies up chinery applications, control is usually to 200 kc. These experiments were made effected near the upper end of the satu- primarily to demonstrate the feasibility ration curve, near the point of abrupt of using the device at these frequencies. saturation. This results in greater power Reasonable amplification fidelity was ob- sensitivity.) With push-pull connection tained, but with low efficiency. Before the "plate" supply rectified pulses are any attempts were made to improve the also doubled and smoothed out. Figure efficiency, the developments were termi- 4 (d) shows idealized push-pull transfer nated in favor of more pressing demands curves. in the computer field. Research in this Figures 5 and 6 show further develop- field was considered more important due ments of push-pull amplifiers. Figure 6 to the greater number of tubes involved. is a single-stage amplifier capable of It is believed no further efforts have gains up to several hundred. Control and been made towards developing magnetic bias windmg are sbown as two single audio amplifiers in this country, although loops; actually they consist of four in- it is understood a 500-watt magnetic dividual coils wound aiding and oppos- audio unit was designed for a European Fig. 8. Typical arrangement for ing to cause an alternate high and low airport, showing excellent response up use, employing magnetic amplifier circuits impedance in each pair of load reactors. to 7000 cps. The carrier power supply in throughout. This results in a rather low efficiency, this instance was 20 kc. This installation, necessitating relatively large reactors however, required hot-cathode rectifiers. to analyze the magnetic amplifier in di- and rectifiers, but does result in im- Recent improvements in core material, rect relation to a tube requires that cer- proved fidelity whea using components rectifiers, and circuitry have elevated the tain assumptions be made, as this ampli- not specifically designed for the purpose. magnetic amplifier, within its limitations, fier differs considerably from those using Figure 7 shows another circuit devel- to a reasonably competitive position with electron tubes. However, since the input oped for audio frequencies, and Fig. 8 the tube amplifier. saturation-control voltage vs. load cur- outlines the general application as a rent of an iron core can be made to fol- whole. Although these schematics are Description For those not familiar with the basic principles of the magnetic amplifier it- self, the following description and fig- ures may be helpful. Figure 1 shows a coil of wire sur- rounding an iron core. With the core completely within % coil, the reactance to a.c. will be high, restricting the flow of current to the load; with the core re- moved the impedance drops to about that of the d.c. resistance of the wire; intermediate positions of the core vary the power to the load accordingly. Skce it would be difficult to move the core rapidly to fdw a= -;ludio frequency, a Fig. "I. Further steps in development of suitable circuit for audio applications.

AUDIO ENGINEERING 8 SEPTEMBER,1952 reproduction, considering the fact that ordinary machit~ery-type reactors and Scale 1:l Scale 10:l rectifiers were used in the amplifier. Oscilloscope patterns indicating the +:+LA 0 response of magnetic core material trig- - .01v gered by 1-mc pulses are shown in Fig. 12. Although only remotely related to L 500 ~1 sec audio applications, they are included to show that the response of a magnetic 8.3V (A) amplifier is adequate for any radio- re- & quirements. The core material used to obtain the above patterns was 4-79 molybdenum steel tape 1/8-mil thick and 3/32-in. wide; the ratio of inductance from zero to maximum saturation was 4: 1; the 5 power supply was 3 mc at 20 volts. In- ;;u,J dications are that the response of steel - .l;V tape core material is superior to the 50 p sec. currently available ferrite cores at this frequency. 6.5V " " According to two British investiga- f Fig. 9. Production model of 400-cps, 10-watt tors, Williams and Noble, it ig possible ~dj(0) control amplifier-approximately same size as to amplify control signals of 10-l8 watts that required for a 5-watt audio unit. For audio at a bandwidth of 10 cps in a special use a different core material and higher-fre- magnetic amplifier having a basic limita- quency carrier would be used. Photograph courtesy Magnetic Ampl~fiers, Inc. tion of 4x watts due to thermal noise. Barkhausen effects in the same +:"-I magnetic amplifier are equivalent to a possibly too simplified, they illustrate signal input of 10-l9 watts for a band- - .4v the operating principles. Design speci- width of 1 cps. Drift is the major limit- fications would call for a better oscillator ing factor in low-input applications. power supply. In addition, the amplifiers From the above investigations it is i would include inverse feedback, bridge apparent that the low-level limits of the 7.5v rectifiers, padding, filtering, and so on. amplifier are adequate to meet normal T (c) Figwe 9 shows a production model of a requirements. It has already demon- 400-cps, 10-watt control amplifier. The strated its ability to amplify relatively manufacturer indicates a 5-watt audio pure sine waves well into the r.f. spec- component would be comparable in size trum. and weight. Indications are that magnetic ampli- +"m-iT Performance Figure 10 is an oscillogram of the out- - .4v +I0 put waveform of a 100-watt magnetic n^ amplifier built two years ago to deter- =+5 k mine the capabilities of the device-at 9 3 0 6V audio frequencies. The circuit used was T (Dl that of Fig. 6; Fig. 11 shows the re- g -5 sponse curves. A 10-kc motor0generator B-,o was used as a power supply, and the 10- Fig. 12. Magnetic flip flops driven at high rates. Upper pair of photos in each box show kc ripple can be noted on the peaks of the input pulses which are, in each case, minimum signal frequency. required to set flip flop. Increased The curves indicate remarkably good loo mo 400 600 1.000 epoo Swo pulse amplitude is required at highet rates. FREQUENCY IN CYCLES PER SECOND The lower photos show r.f. envelopes. (A) Pulse repetition rate = 2000 pps. (Time be- Fig. 11. Response curves for 100-watt ampli- tween pulses = 500 psec) R.F. envelope = 1.42 fier used in making oscillograms of Fig. 10. mc. (B) Pulse repetition rate = 20,000 pps. (Time between pulses = 50 psec) R.F. envelope fiers have several advantages over = 1.32 mc. (C) Pulse repetition fate = 200,000 equivalent tube amplifiers, namely : pps. (Time between pulses = 5 psec) R.F. 1. Reliability. The rectifier is the life- envelope = 1.4 mc. (Dl Pulse repetition rate = 400,000 pps. (Time between pulses = 2.5 psec) 100 cps 400 cps determining factor. Selenium rectifiers R.F. envelope = 1.5 mc. currently in use have a normal life ex- pectancy of around 60,000 hours. Mod- are less, because the stability of a ern crystal rectifiers have a similar life, rectifier is greater than that of a hot with a much higher efficiency, but are cathode. limited, at the present stage of develop- 8. Relatively unaffected by fungus, ment, to a forward current of about 500 moisture, and heat. 1,000 cps 2,500 cps ma, and an inverse peak voltage of 400. ra 2. Require no warm up time. The disadvantages are : 3. Power consumption (with push-pull 1. Currently, until mass production of class B connection) during standby core material and rectifiers is estab- periods is low. lished, these amplifiers will cost more. rn5,000 cps 4. Fewer components. 2. No suitable static r.f. power supply 5. Rugged; practically indestructible. is available. This makes it necessary to dse a tube oscillator as a power supply. Fig. 10. Output waveforms for various fre- 6. Will withstand considerable over- quencies. These cuts were made from actual loads. This is not a serious disadvantage, how- oscillograms made from a 100-watt magnetic 7. Unbalanced effects in balanced cir- ever, when one considers that an electron amplifier. cuits, due to cathode emission changes, [Continwed on page 731 AUDIO ENGINEERING SEPTEMBER, 1952 AUDIO FREQUENCY FUNDAMENTALS [from page 461 tube amplifier also requires a power sup- ply (rectifier-filter) to convert the 60- cps a.c. to d.c. A similar tube to convert 60-cps to430 kc would be comparable in size. Tube manufacturers indicate that this oscillator tube can be made with a life expectancy of 10 years, ruggedized for proximity fuse applications if desired. 3. Until more efficient rectifiers and improved circuitry are developed, this amplifier will be less efficient and possi- bly larger than equivalent tube units. From the small efforts made toward magnetic audio amplifiers, it appears that there may be tremendous possibili- ties in this field, especially in high-power applications. NOTE:Most of the material used in this article was obtained from a Bureau of Ships pamphlet, NAVSHIPS900, 172, titled "Mag- netic Amplifiers, A Rising Star in Naval Electronics," published several months ago to stimulate interest in the magnetic am- plifier. This material has not as yet been evaluated by the Bureau Engineers.

AUDIO ENGINEERING SEPTEMBER. 1952