<<

JAccid Emerg Med 1999;16:55-59 55

CLINICAL MANAGEMENT J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.16.1.55 on 1 January 1999. Downloaded from

Investigation and management of patients with pleuritic presenting to the accident and emergency department

Kevin Jones, A Raghuram

Chest pain is one of the commonest medical (3) confirming a diagnosis of pulmonary problems presenting to an accident and emer- in a patient with chronic obstructive gency (A&E) department. It is often a pulmonary disease. symptom of serious underlying cardiac or pul- monary disease. Establishing the nature of the pain is an important step in making a diagno- Nature ofpleuritic chest pain sis as, in many cases, clinical examination and The itself is insensitive to pain so the pain simple investigations can be normal. Many of must arise from the conditions (see table 1) can cause pleuritic pleura, tracheobronchial tree, or chest wall. pain but the major diagnosis that it is Pleuritic pain can also be mimicked by important not to miss is pulmonary infarction cardiac, pericardial, and musculoskeletal dis- due to a small pulmonary . A study of ease (see table 1). Pleuritic pain is typically 173 consecutive patients presenting to the sharp, stabbing, and made worse by emergency department of an American hospi- inspiration and coughing. of the tal with pleuritic chest pain reported that pul- upper part of the parietal pleura causes a pain monary was the cause in 21 %.1 localised to the chest itself. The lower portion, Failure to prevent a further and larger pulmo- including the outer segment of the diaphrag- nary embolus by the institution of anticoagu- matic pleura, is innervated by the lower six lation can have catastrophic consequences. intercostal nerves which also supply the Bury General Central to the initial investigation of a patient abdominal wall. Pleural inflammation here Hospital, Bury with pleuritic chest pain is the chest radio- can cause pain in the upper abdomen or loin.2 BL9 6PG graph but, as will be discussed, three of the The central part of the diaphragmatic pleura is http://emj.bmj.com/ K Jones most difficult problems in acute medicine are innervated by the phrenic nerve so that pain A Raghuram (1) diagnosing the cause ofpleuritic chest pain from here is felt in the and the tip of the Correspondence to: when the is normal, (2) shoulder.2 The diaphragm can also be irritated Dr Jones, Consultant in distinguishing pulmonary infarction from by upper abdominal disease such as Respiratory Medicine. when a patient has pleuritic chest , , and subphrenic ab- Accepted 16 March 1998 pain and an abnormal chest radiograph, and scess. Table 1 Pleuritic chest pain: diagnoses, investigation, history, and examination on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright.

Key diagnoses Pneumonia Pulmonary embolus/infarction : viral /Dressler's syndrome Chest wall/muscular pain Herpes zoster /connective tissue disease Investigation History taking and clinical examination are basic to the investigation of all patients presenting to the accident and emergency department. Failure to take a good history is the commonest diagnostic error in these patients. Key aspects of the history and examination are listed in the key boxes. There is no pathognomic pattern which gives the diagnosis but a "jigsaw" whose pieces must be fitted together (warning: do not be tempted to leave important findings out just because they do not fit with your idea of the most likely diagnosis). Key aspects of the history Pain: type, speed of onset, position, radiation, associated tenderness Other symptoms: breathlessness, , , , haemoptysis, leg pain or swelling Previous history: especially of chest symptoms, deep venous , or Risk factors: major surgery, or puerperium, immobility, malignancy, cardiorespiratory disease, lower limb trauma or surgery, thrombotic disorders, oestrogen therapy, prolonged air travel Key aspects ofthe examination Vital signs: , temperature, , respiratory rate General: pallor, Chest: expansion, palpation, , Legs: swelling, tenderness Abdomen: tenderness, masses 56 Jones, Raghuram

It is important to stress that chest pain is not associated pericardial rub which can occur a universal finding in pulmonary embolus, during systole, diastole, or both. especially if the embolus is large. However, (2) Chest wall pain arising from the J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.16.1.55 on 1 January 1999. Downloaded from pleuritic chest pain will occur in 85% of intercostal nerves, muscles, or ribs often comes patients with submassive emboli.3 Pulmonary on suddenly after local trauma or violent infarction will cause pleuritic chest pain, coughing. Although it hurts to breathe, the breathlessness, or both in over 95% ofpatients4 patient should not feel breathless when still. but the classical triad of pleuritic pain, The pain may be exacerbated by posture, dyspnoea, and haemoptysis is present in less twisting movements of the , or move- than a third of patients with documented ments of the upper limbs as well as by inspira- pulmonary emboli."5 Ninety per cent of tion or coughing. There is often a localised area patients with pulmonary embolism will have of tenderness on the chest wall and pressure deep thromboses (DVTs) in the leg over this should reproduce the pain. However, on imaging.6 However, clinical signs of DVT chest wall tenderness does not completely may be absent in over 70% of patients with exclude pulmonary embolism as it can be pulmonary embolism.3 present in 6% of such patients.4 Bornholm dis- ease is usually caused by the . Investigations It starts as an upper infection A good quality chest radiograph and electro- and can cause intercostal myalgia, pleurisy cardiogram (ECG) should be produced in with rub, pericarditis, and chest wall every patient with pleuritic chest pain. Some tenderness.8 Tietze's syndrome or costochon- (especially if breathless with a normal chest dritis causes painful swelling of the upper cos- radiograph) will also require arterial blood gas tal cartilages.8 analysis to aid with diagnosis. It often helps to (3) Viral pleurisy is associated with flu-like go back over the history and examination after symptoms and can cause a pleural rub. It is the results are available. important to ask all patients about previous prodromal symptoms and to examine for fever THE ECG and pleural rubs. A rub is thought to be caused The ECG may show classical changes of myo- by friction between the two layers of inflamed cardial infarction or pericarditis, in which case pleura. It is not always accompanied by pain. the diagnosis is made and specific treatment The sound is classically described as a creak can be instituted. The commonest ECG and tends to occur at the same point in each abnormality in pulmonary embolism is simply respiratory cycle, often in both inspiration and sinus . may also expiration. It is not removed by coughing and occur. The "classical changes" of pulmonary is the one abnormal breath sound that can also embolus-"S1,Q3,T3"-are due to right heart be palpable. Its presence means there is pleural strain. They may be seen with large emboli but inflammation but it does not distinguish the will be absent in the vast majority.4 cause.2 Fever and leucocytosis can be a feature of both infection and embolism.4 ARTERIAL BLOOD GASES The chest radiograph is commonly normal Arterial hypoxaemia in a breathless patient with pulmonary embolism. Its major use is to http://emj.bmj.com/ without pre-existing lung disease and with a exclude other pathologies and aid in the normal chest radiograph is suggestive of interpretation of isotope lung scans. Pulmo- pulmonary embolus but is not sensitive. nary embolism is a difficult condition to Normal blood gases do not exclude the diagnose yet failure to do so puts a patient's life presence of a small pulmonary embolus.4 at risk. Our advice is that unless there is Other conditions like viral pleurisy can cause another obvious explanation for pleuritic chest

similar levels of to pulmonary pain and breathlessness in a patient with a nor- on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. infarction.7 Pulse oximetry measures mal chest radiograph, they should be admitted saturation of haemoglobin. Saturation may to hospital, started on intravenous anticoagula- remain normal until arterial oxygen pressure tion with , and then sent for an isotope has fallen to 8.0 kPa. Thus pulse oximetry is a ventilation/ (V/Q) scan. This is par- very insensitive measure of hypoxia and is lim- ticularly important if there are any risk factors ited in its diagnostic usefulness. for pulmonary thromboembolism.

PLEURITIC CHEST PAIN WITH A NORMAL CHEST PLEURITIC CHEST PAIN WITH AN ABNORMAL RADIOGRAPH CHEST RADIOGRAPH If the chest radiograph is normal, the major The classical features of a pulmonary embolus differential diagnoses are pericarditis, chest on chest radiograph include wedge shaped wall pain, viral pleurisy, and pulmonary embo- peripheral densities and segmental or lobar lus. The diagnosis is then based on a diminution in pulmonary vasculature. These meticulous history and examination (see are rarely seen. Many of the abnormalities are above). non-specific, the commonest being (1) Pericardial pain often has a pleuritic or pulmonary parenchymal shadows.4 Other component because ofassociated pleural irrita- features include cardiomegaly, pleural effu- tion. It is sometimes brought on by swallowing sions, and elevation of the diaphragm. Small because of the proximity of the oesophagus to pleural effusions occur in 48-60% of patients the back of the heart. The pain is worse and with pulmonary infarction and seem to be more left sided in the supine posture and more common with pulmonary emboli than relieved by leaning forward. There may be an with other causes of pleurisy.4 I Investigation and management ofpatients with pleuritic chest pain 57

Patients with pleuritic chest pain and an reduced perfusion with normal ventilation is abnormal radiograph often require admission. the only pattern seen with pulmonary emboli Patients with a definite diagnosis of pneumo- but this is not the case. Pulmonary infarcts can J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.16.1.55 on 1 January 1999. Downloaded from nia may be treated according to published give matched defects." Therefore, a non- guidelines.9 It may be very difficult to differen- diagnostic scan must be put into the context of tiate between infarction and infection on the the clinical situation. If the clinical suspicion basis of the radiograph and if there are of pulmonary embolus is high then any abnor- features in the history or examination that mal scan may justify a diagnosis of pulmonary might suggest pulmonary embolism then these embolism and appropriate patients will require referral for admission, treatment. intravenous anticoagulation, and further in- If pulmonary infarction causes radiographic vestigation. As will be discussed later, if evidence ofpulmonary infiltrates, it makes V/Q pulmonary infarction causes radiographic scanning difficult to interpret. The V/Q scan is abnormalities, it alters the way V/Q scans are likely to show non-diagnostic changes in the interpreted. area of the chest radiographic shadowing which will make differentiation between infarct PLEURITIC CHEST PAIN AND CHRONIC LUNG and other pathologies (for example pneumo- DISEASE nia) impossible. If there are additional V/Q Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary defects in areas which appear normal on the disease and pleuritic chest pain constitute an chest radiograph, then this is supportive of a extremely difficult diagnostic problem. These diagnosis of pulmonary emboli." If the V/Q patients are at increased risk of pulmonary scan is non-diagnostic (which occurs in about emboli due to relative immobility, hypoxia, 70% of cases") imaging of the deep venous polycythaemia, and right . How- system of the legs has been suggested as a way ever, they also have an increased incidence of of further determining which patients require infective pleurisy and chest wall pains. Clinical anticoagulation, which require further investi- pointers are even more unreliable. For exam- gation, and which can be safely observed with- ple, chest radiograph, ECG, and arterial blood out specific treatment.'2 13 gases are already likely to be abnormal. In addition, V/Q scanning is unlikely to give a DETECTION OF DVT specific answer. The scan will show widespread (This subject is covered in another article in abnormalities of ventilation and perfusion the series.) matching due to the underlying lung disease. It DVT in the calf veins is not a risk factor for is probably best to refer these patients to the pulmonary emboli. Venous thrombi in pop- respiratory consultant who is responsible for liteal veins or above are highly likely to cause their long term care. clinically significant pulmonary emboli. Many DVTs (including those in more proximal PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY veins) occur without symptoms or signs.'4 Pulmonary angiography is the Ascending venography is the gold standard for for the diagnosis of pulmonary emboli. It is detecting DVTs but this is invasive, expensive, safe, accurate and reproducible, with close and painful so most hospitals rely on Doppler http://emj.bmj.com/ agreement in the interpretation of the results ultrasound or impedance plethysmography. between independent observers. However, it is Neither test is able to detect calfvein thrombo- expensive and invasive so that only one third of ses, but will detect the more significant acute hospitals in Britain supply the service proximal vein thrombi. Both tests have sensi- and in these, pulmonary angiography is tivities and specificities of over 90% in patients performed on average only four times a year for with symptoms suggestive of DVT.

diagnosing acute pulmonary emboli.'0 Venograms show in the deep on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. venous system in at least 70% of patients with V/Q LUNG SCANNING pulmonary emboli. This has led to the theory Isotope V/Q lung scans are the most com- that if a patient with presumed pulmonary monly used investigation in patients suspected embolism has no evidence ofvenous thrombo- of having pulmonary emboli. Scans are taken sis, then either the diagnosis is wrong or the of the after the patient breathes a radio- thrombus has completely broken off and there active gas to check for ventilation defects and is little chance of further emboli.'5 It is now then again after an intravenous injection of a commonly advocated that any patient with a radioactive marker to check uniformity of per- non-diagnostic V/Q scan should have Doppler fusion. Evaluation of the scans notes the pres- ultrasound of the lower limbs. If this shows ence and size (segmental and subsegmental) thrombi, then the diagnosis of pulmonary of perfusion ' defects, whether these are embolism is likely and the patient should be matched by defects in ventilation and whether anticoagulated. Problems arise if no DVT is they correlate with abnormalities on the plain demonstrated (as occurs in about 40% of chest radiograph. The report is expressed as patients with suspected pulmonary normal scan, low probability scan, intermedi- embolism'5). In the larger centres, pulmonary ate probability scan or high probability scan." angiography is advocated, but as already A normal scan practically rules out the possi- discussed, this is unlikely to be feasible in most bility of an acute pulmonary embolus and a district general hospitals. Although the patient high probability scan means the patient should could be transferred to a unit that regularly be anticoagulated. Any other scan result is practices pulmonary angiography, this is non-diagnostic. Many clinicians believe that highly impracticable due to the large number 58 5Jones, Raghuram

of patients involved. Some centres do not D-DIMER AND SPIRAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY anticoagulate but carry out serial investiga- D-dimer is a fragment produced by the action tions of the deep veins of the legs and proceed of the fibrinolytic system. Its levels are raised J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.16.1.55 on 1 January 1999. Downloaded from to anticoagulation if a proximal DVT in pulmonary embolism. It seems to be a arises. 5 highly sensitive test but unfortunately is very Often, the decision on whether or not to non-specific. If low levels of D-dimer were continue anticoagulation after a non- found in suspected pulmonary embolism with diagnostic scan and no evidence of DVT a non-diagnostic V/Q scan and negative inves- comes down to the clinical suspicion of pulmo- tigations for DVT, this might give further nary embolism and the presence of associated reassurance that anticoagulation was unnecessary.'7 Probably the best advance for risk factors. It is not uncommon to treat the future will be the introduction of a patients for both pneumonia and pulmonary non-invasive imaging technique to replace embolism with intravenous heparin and anti- pulmonary angiography. Spiral volumetric biotics in the short term and for computed tomographic scanning may provide longer. This is probably a safer course of such a technique which could be readily action than not to anticoagulate if any doubt used in every district general hospital. At remains. We believe the consequences of a fur- present, however, doubts remain about its ther large pulmonary embolus outweigh the ability to detect small peripheral pulmonary risks of side effects from warfarin. This is emboli. 8 especially so when warfarin does not have to be taken long term. The British Thoracic Society recommends that in the presence of a British Thoracic Society guidelines known risk factor, a patient diagnosed as hav- The British Thoracic Society has recently pro- ing a pulmonary embolism need be anticoagu- duced guidelines for the investigation and lated for only four weeks (provided the risk management of patients with suspected pul- factor has been removed ). If there is no iden- monary embolism.'9 These give a full review of tifiable risk factor, then warfarin should be the literature with graded recommendations given for three months. The incidence of and levels of evidence. Their principal aim is to major haemorrhagic complications in these recommend a diagnostic and management two groups of patients is very low at less than strategy which could be used by junior medical staff. We strongly advocate that our colleagues 2% . 16 in A&E medicine become familiar with these guidelines. Patient with pleuritic chest pain

Summary History, examination, CXR, ECG, blood gases The assessment ofa patient with pleuritic chest pain calls for a high degree of clinical acumen and a high degree of suspicion that the diagno- sis might be pulmonary embolism. This area is http://emj.bmj.com/ Other diagnosis confirmed one of the most difficult in A&E medicine (and indeed chest medicine). One error is to "think the best" when considering the diagnosis in Treat as appropriate such patients but experience soon teaches to "think PE" and diagnose less serious condi- Pulmonary embolism (PE) suspected tions only when pulmonary embolism has been

excluded. A key consideration is the presence on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. of risk factors. Because the diagnosis is Heparinise difficult, there should be no hesitation in requesting a senior opinion or referring to the an ViQ scan inpatient medical team. We have produced algorithm (fig 1) for the investigation and man- agement of pleuritic chest pain as discussed in

. z ~~~- this article. High probability scan No)n-diagnostic scan Normal scan Three questions relating to this article are: (1) Can pulmonary embolism be the diagno- Treat as PE In)vestigate for DVT Do not treat as PE sis in a patient with pleuritic chest pain but a normal chest radiograph, ECG, and arterial blood gases? (2) What is the chest radiograph abnormal- DVT present No DVT present ity which is most likely to alert you to the possibility of pulmonary embolism? (3) What percentage of patients with a low Treat as PE Pulmonary angiography clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism but or a high probability V/Q scan will have pulmo- treat on clinical suspicion nary embolism demonstrated on pulmonary angiography? (see Fennerty'3) Figure 1 Algorithm for investigation and management ofpleuritic chest pain. CXR = chest radiograph; DVT = ; ECG = electrocardiogram; The three key references are The PIOPED VIQ = ventilationlperfusion. Investigators," Dalen,'2 and Fennerty." Investigation and management ofpatients with pleuritic chest pain 59

1 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism 10 Cooper TJ, Hayward WJ, Hartog M. Survey on the use of in outpatients with pleuritic chest pain. Arch Intern Med pulmonary and angiography for suspected 1988;148:838-44. pulmonary thromboembolism in the UK. Clin Radiol 2 Ogilvie CM. Symptoms and signs in respiratory disease. In: 199 1;43:243-5. J Accid Emerg Med: first published as 10.1136/emj.16.1.55 on 1 January 1999. Downloaded from Brewis RAL, Corrin B, Geddes DM, Gibson GJ, eds. Res- 11 The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/ piratory medicine. 2nd Ed. London: WB Saunders, 1995: perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA 245-57. 1991;263:2753-9. 3 Bell WR, Simon TL, DeMets DL. The clinical features of 12 Dalen JE. When can treatment be withheld in patients with submassive and massive pulmonary emboli. Am 7 Med suspected pulmonary embolism? Arch Intern Med 1993; 1977;62:355-60. 153:1415-8. 4 Stein PD, Terrin ML, Hales CA, et al. Clinical, laboratory, 13 Fennerty T. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. BMJ roentgenographic and electrocardiographic findings in 1997;314:425-9. patients with acute pulmonary embolism and no pre- of the art. Venous thromboembolism. Am existing cardiac or pulmonary disease. Chest 1991;100: 14 Moser KM. State 598-603. Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:235-49. 5 Wenger NK, Stein PD, Willis PW. Massive acute pulmonary 15 Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, et al. A new noninvasive embolism. The deceivingly nonspecific manifestations. management strategy for patients with suspected pulmo- 3'AMA 1972;220:843-4. nary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1989;149:2549-55. 6 Hull R, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, 16 Research Committee of the British Thoracic Society. Opti- ventilation lung scanning and venography for clinically sus- mum duration of anticoagulation for deep venous throm- pected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion bosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet 1992;340:873-6. scans. Ann Intern Med 1983;98:891-9. 17 Mountain D, Brown AFT. A review of the usefulness of 7 Branch WT, McNeil BI. Analysis of the differential diagno- D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. sis and assessment of pleuritic chest pain in young adults. Emergency Medicine 1996;8:253-9. Am J Med 1983;75:671-9. 18 van Rossum AB, Treurniet FEE, Kieft GJ, et al. Role of spi- 8 Macfarlane JT. Acute respiratory infections in adults. In: ral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the Brewis RAL, Corrin B, Geddes DM, Gibson GJ, eds. Res- assessment ofpatients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary piratory medicine. 2nd Ed. London: WB Saunders, 1995: embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung 705-46. scan. Thorax 1996;51:23-8. 9 British Thoracic Society. Guidelines for the management of 19 British Thoracic Society, Standards of Care Committee. community acquired pneumonia in adults admitted to hos- Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a practical ap- pital. Br3r Hosp Med 1993;49:346-50. proach. Thorax 1997;52 (suppl 4): S1-24. http://emj.bmj.com/ on September 29, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright.