DOCSLIB.ORG

MINISTERE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGERES Protocole D’Etat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MINISTERE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGERES Protocole D’Etat MINISTERE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGERES Protocole d’Etat LISTE DES MEMBRES DU CORPS DIPLOMATIQUE SOFIA Fevrier, 2019 TABLE DES MATIERES PRESEA NCE DES CHEFS DE MIS SION .................... 6 CORPS DIPLOMATIQUE ......................................................... 16 AFGHANISTAN ............................................................................................ 17 AFRIQUE DU SUD ........................................................................................ 18 ALBANIE ....................................................................................................... 19 ALGERIE ....................................................................................................... 20 REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE ............................................. 21 ETATS-UNIS D'AMERIQUE ........................................................................ 24 PRINCIPAUTÉ D'ANDORRE ....................................................................... 26 ANGOLA........................................................................................................ 27 ROYAUME DE L’ARABIE SAOUDITE ...................................................... 28 ARGENTINE .................................................................................................. 30 ARMENIE ...................................................................................................... 31 AUSTRALIE .................................................................................................. 32 AUTRICHE .................................................................................................... 34 AZERBAIDJAN ............................................................................................. 36 BANGLADESH ............................................................................................. 37 BELARUS ...................................................................................................... 38 BELGIQUE .................................................................................................... 39 BENIN ............................................................................................................ 41 BOSNIE ET HERZEGOVINE........................................................................ 42 BRESIL ........................................................................................................... 43 BURKINA FASO ........................................................................................... 44 BURUNDI ...................................................................................................... 45 CAMBODGE .................................................................................................. 46 CAMEROUN .................................................................................................. 47 CANADA ....................................................................................................... 48 CHILI .............................................................................................................. 50 CHINE ............................................................................................................ 51 CHYPRE ....................................................................................................... 503 COLOMBIE .................................................................................................... 54 REPUBLIQUE DEMOCRATIQUE DU CONGO .......................................... 55 REPUBLIQUE POPULAIRE DEMOCRATIQUE DE COREE ..................... 56 REPUBLIQUE DE COREE ............................................................................ 58 COTE D'IVOIRE ............................................................................................ 59 CROATIE ....................................................................................................... 60 CUBA ............................................................................................................. 61 DANEMARK ................................................................................................. 62 REPUBLIQUE DOMINICAINE .................................................................... 63 2 EGYPTE ......................................................................................................... 64 ÉMIRATS ARABES UNIS ............................................................................ 65 EQUATEUR ................................................................................................... 66 ERYTHREE .................................................................................................... 67 ESPAGNE ...................................................................................................... 68 ESTONIE ........................................................................................................ 70 ETHIOPIE ...................................................................................................... 71 FINLANDE .................................................................................................... 72 FRANCE ......................................................................................................... 73 GEORGIE ....................................................................................................... 76 GHANA .......................................................................................................... 77 GRANDE BRETAGNE .................................................................................. 78 GRÈCE ........................................................................................................... 80 GUATEMALA ............................................................................................... 82 REPUBLIQUE DE GUINEE .......................................................................... 83 GUINEE BISSAU ........................................................................................... 84 GUYANE........................................................................................................ 85 HONGRIE ...................................................................................................... 86 INDE ............................................................................................................... 88 INDONESIE ................................................................................................... 89 IRAN ............................................................................................................... 90 IRAK ............................................................................................................... 92 IRLANDE ....................................................................................................... 93 ISLANDE ....................................................................................................... 94 ISRAEL .......................................................................................................... 95 ITALIE............................................................................................................ 97 JAMAIQUE .................................................................................................... 99 JAPON .......................................................................................................... 100 JORDANIE ................................................................................................... 102 KAZAKHSTAN ........................................................................................... 103 KENYA ........................................................................................................ 104 KOSOVO ...................................................................................................... 105 KOWEIT ....................................................................................................... 106 LAOS ............................................................................................................ 107 LESOTHO .................................................................................................... 108 LETTONIE ................................................................................................... 109 LIBAN .......................................................................................................... 110 LIBYE ........................................................................................................... 111 LITUANIE .................................................................................................... 112 LUXEMBOURG .......................................................................................... 113 MACEDOINE DU NORD ............................................................................ 114 MADAGASCAR .......................................................................................... 115 3 MALAISIE ................................................................................................... 116 MALAWI...................................................................................................... 117 MALI ............................................................................................................ 118 MALTE ......................................................................................................... 119 MAROC ........................................................................................................ 120 MAURITANIE ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Българската Народна Банка of the Bulgarian National Bank
    Посвещава се на годишнината Celebrating от основаването the Anniversary на Българската народна банка of the Bulgarian National Bank ОЛЕГ НЕДЯЛКОВ OLEG NEDYALKOV ЛЮДМИЛА ДИМОВА LYUDMILA DIMOVA БЪЛГАРСКАТА THE BULGARIAN НАРОДНА БАНКА NATIONAL BANK И НЕЙНАТА РОЛЯ AND ITS ROLE В СТОПАНСКОТО IN BULGARIAN РАЗВИТИЕ ECONOMIC НА БЪЛГАРИЯ DEVELOPMENT (1879–2009) София Sofia 2009 Изказваме искрената си благодарност на членовете на The Authors express sincere gratitude to the members of the Управителния съвет на БНБ за оказаната подкрепа и за BNB Governing Council for its support and for their valuable ценните бележки и препоръки, на Владимир Ташков и comments and suggestions, to Vladimir Tashkov and Vasil Ko- Васил Коларов за предоставената информация, както и на larov for the information they shared, and to Christo Yanovsky Христо Яновски за препоръките и уточненията, помогнали for its helpful feedback and elaborations. ни в работата по това издание. Специална благодарност дължим на редакторите Нина Special thanks are due to editors Nina Ivanova (Bulgarian) and Иванова (бълг.) и Ивета Колчакова (англ.) за прецизната Iveta Kolchakova (English) for the precision they injected into работа по текста, на преводача Питър Скип и на Калин the text, to translator Peter Skipp and to Kalin Atanassov and Атанасов и служителите от Полиграфичната база на the BNB Publications Division staff for the professional and БНБ за високопрофесионалната и самоотвержена работа, unstinting effort which made possible the timely appearance направила възможно навременното отпечатване на of this work. книгата. Aвторите The Authors Използваните илюстрации са от Архива на БНБ, The publication uses illustrations from the BNB Archive, колекцията на Иван Бърнев – Буби, Централния the Ivan Barnev “Bubi” Collection, the Central State Archive, държавен архив, Българския исторически архив на the Sveti Sveti Kiril i Metodiy National Library Historical Народна библиотека „Св.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA and HUNGARY in the FIRST WORLD WAR: a VIEW from the 21ST CENTURY 21St -Century Studies in Humanities
    BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY 21st -Century Studies in Humanities Editor: Pál Fodor Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 BULGARIA AND HUNGARY IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR: A VIEW FROM THE 21ST CENTURY Editors GÁBOR DEMETER CSABA KATONA PENKA PEYKOVSKA Research Centre for the Humanities Budapest–Sofia, 2020 Technical editor: Judit Lakatos Language editor: David Robert Evans Translated by: Jason Vincz, Bálint Radó, Péter Szőnyi, and Gábor Demeter Lectored by László Bíró (HAS RCH, senior research fellow) The volume was supported by theBulgarian–Hungarian History Commission and realized within the framework of the project entitled “Peripheries of Empires and Nation States in the 17th–20th Century Central and Southeast Europe. Power, Institutions, Society, Adaptation”. Supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences NKFI-EPR K 113004, East-Central European Nationalisms During the First World War NKFI FK 128 978 Knowledge, Lanscape, Nation and Empire ISBN: 978-963-416-198-1 (Institute of History – Research Center for the Humanities) ISBN: 978-954-2903-36-9 (Institute for Historical Studies – BAS) HU ISSN 2630-8827 Cover: “A Momentary View of Europe”. German caricature propaganda map, 1915. Published by the Research Centre for the Humanities Responsible editor: Pál Fodor Prepress preparation: Institute of History, RCH, Research Assistance Team Leader: Éva Kovács Cover design: Bence Marafkó Page layout: Bence Marafkó Printed in Hungary by Prime Rate Kft., Budapest CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................... 9 Zoltán Oszkár Szőts and Gábor Demeter THE CAUSES OF THE OUTBREAK OF WORLD WAR I AND THEIR REPRESENTATION IN SERBIAN HISTORIOGRAPHY .................................. 25 Krisztián Csaplár-Degovics ISTVÁN TISZA’S POLICY TOWARDS THE GERMAN ALLIANCE AND AGAINST GERMAN INFLUENCE IN THE YEARS OF THE GREAT WAR................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty of Humanities Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
    Faculty of Humanities Information sheet Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski Type of exchange: Erasmus + programme Details of exchange Field of study: European Studies / Humanities Erasmus study code: 022 – Humanities Study Level of exchange: Bachelor Maximum number of students: 2 Semester or year: Semester Details university: Erasmuscode: BG SOFIA06 Website: https://erasmus.uni-sofia.bg/site/income/ Term dates: Winter Term: 03 October 2016 – 20 January 2017. Exam Period : 23 January - 17 February. Summer term: 20 February – 09 June 2017. Exam period : 12 June 2017 – 07 July 2017 Course catalogue: Read here Accommodation: Read here © Published by the International Relations Department, 2016 Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski GUIDE FOR INCOMING 15, Tzar Osvoboditel Blvd 1504 Sofia, BULGARIA ERASMUS STUDENTS e-mail: [email protected] http://www.uni-sofia.bg/index.php/eng/international_relationsOhridski Academic year 2016/2017 SOFIA UNIVERSITY ST. KLIMENT OHRIDSKI This Guide has been elaborated and published by the International Relations Department at Sofia University with the financial support of the European Commission thru Erasmus+ Programme. The publication reflects the views only of the author and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. ERASMUS Guide ERASMUS Guide CONTENTS WELCOME NOTE 1 ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY 2 Brief history 2 Administrative structure of the University 3 Faculties 4 University campuses 5 University Libraries 8 University Publishing House
    [Show full text]
  • 'Forebears', 'Saints' and 'Martyrs': the Politics Of
    ‘Forebears’, ‘saints’ and ‘martyrs’: the politics of commemoration in Bulgaria in the 1880s and 1890s1 Stefan Detchev (West University, Bulgaria) Тhe memory of the Bulgarian national revolutionary movement, as in all other national ideologies,2 was not transmitted only in books.3 It was embodied in the images of ‘saints’ and ‘martyrs’ commemorated at specific places. This paper will focus on the importance of the cult of forebears and predecessors as a part of popular political culture in Bulgaria in the 1880s and 1890s. During this period it increasingly mattered how ordinary people felt about nationality. The importance of this problem increased because of the introduction of universal male suffrage which followed the Tărnovo constitution of 1879.4 In this regard attention will be paid to days of national commemoration usually organised at the places of execution of Bulgarian national heroes and where Bulgarian rebel detachments had had battles.5 These days of commemoration were cultural and discursive practices that constituted new identities, new definitions of patriotism and identification with the state. I will be arguing that the commemoration of dead leaders and great events from the past played a very important role in shaping popular historical memory as part of identity building which cannot be done without stories, signs and symbols.6 These rituals shaped the ways in which the national revolutionaries were perceived and imagined. They invented a nationalistic public tradition and fostered a form of patriotism specific to itself. In this way historical myths became a part of political mythology and they aided political mobilisation. The commemorations were the obvious sites for this to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • "Shoot the Teacher!": Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle
    "SHOOT THE TEACHER!" EDUCATION AND THE ROOTS OF THE MACEDONIAN STRUGGLE Julian Allan Brooks Bachelor of Arts, University of Victoria, 1992 Bachelor of Education, University of British Columbia, 200 1 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS In the Department of History O Julian Allan Brooks 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Julian Allan Brooks Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: "Shoot the Teacher!" Education and the Roots of the Macedonian Struggle Examining Committee: Chair: Professor Mark Leier Professor of History Professor AndrC Gerolymatos Senior Supervisor Professor of History Professor Nadine Roth Supervisor Assistant Professor of History Professor John Iatrides External Examiner Professor of International Relations Southern Connecticut State University Date Approved: DECLARATION OF PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection, and, without changing the content, to translate the thesislproject or extended essays, if technically possible, to any medium or format for the purpose of preservation of the digital work.
    [Show full text]
  • Balkan Wars Between the Lines: Violence and Civilians in Macedonia, 1912-1918
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: BALKAN WARS BETWEEN THE LINES: VIOLENCE AND CIVILIANS IN MACEDONIA, 1912-1918 Stefan Sotiris Papaioannou, Ph.D., 2012 Directed By: Professor John R. Lampe, Department of History This dissertation challenges the widely held view that there is something morbidly distinctive about violence in the Balkans. It subjects this notion to scrutiny by examining how inhabitants of the embattled region of Macedonia endured a particularly violent set of events: the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War. Making use of a variety of sources including archives located in the three countries that today share the region of Macedonia, the study reveals that members of this majority-Orthodox Christian civilian population were not inclined to perpetrate wartime violence against one another. Though they often identified with rival national camps, inhabitants of Macedonia were typically willing neither to kill their neighbors nor to die over those differences. They preferred to pursue priorities they considered more important, including economic advancement, education, and security of their properties, all of which were likely to be undermined by internecine violence. National armies from Balkan countries then adjacent to geographic Macedonia (Bulgaria, Greece, and Serbia) and their associated paramilitary forces were instead the perpetrators of violence against civilians. In these violent activities they were joined by armies from Western and Central Europe during the First World War. Contrary to existing military and diplomatic histories that emphasize continuities between the Balkan Wars of 1912-1913 and the First World War, this primarily social history reveals that the nature of abuses committed against civilians changed rapidly during this six-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Is My Friend?
    Annual report 2019 Where is my friend? WorldReginfo - 6d7d956a-d08e-4406-874f-a3df3fd8a00e Fibank Supports the Bulgarian Rhythmic Gymnastics Federation and the Animal Rescue Sofia pet shelter Cover (top to bottom): Margarita Vasileva – member of the Bulgarian National Rhythmic Gymnastics team and dog Stella from Animal Rescue pet shelter Nevyana Vladinova – member of the Bulgarian National Rhythmic Gymnastics team and cat Zory from Animal Rescue pet shelter Simona Dyankova – member of the Bulgarian National Rhythmic Gymnastics team аnd dog Buddy from Animal Rescue pet shelter Catherine Tsoneva – member of the Bulgarian National Rhythmic Gymnastics team and dog Belcho from Animal Rescue pet shelter WorldReginfo - 6d7d956a-d08e-4406-874f-a3df3fd8a00e With the rapid development of digitalization, technology and globalization, it is ever more important to preserve our human nature, spirituality and empathy. In this year’s report, along with our financial and corporate results, we tried to give a visual expression of that inner light that inspires us and makes us better and happier persons. Where is my Friend is not just a question, but also a matter of choice. The team of WorldReginfo - 6d7d956a-d08e-4406-874f-a3df3fd8a00e The present report is prepared on the grounds of and in compliance with the requirements of the Accounting Act, the Law on Public Offering of Securities, Ordinance №2 of the Financial Supervision Commission for the prospects of public offering and admittance for trade on a regulated market of securities and for the disclosure of information, Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and the National Corporate Governance Code, approved by the Financial Supervision Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 107 89 73 59 43 31 23 21 9 5 3
    contents Who we are 3 Message by the Chairman 5 Managing Board 9 Supervisory Council 21 Advisory Council 23 Members 31 Commi﬐ ees 43 Branches 59 Regions 73 Sectors 89 Events 107 THE VOICE OF BULGARIAN BUSINESS 1 KRIB HAS THE AIM TO BE MOST WIDELY REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY krib KRIB IS “THE VOICE OF THE BULGARIAN BUSINESS” THAT: produces three quarters of the country’s GDP provides jobs to over 800 000 people unites over 11 000 companies, which are members through individual or collec﬒ ve membership, among them the biggest companies in Bulgaria accounts for more than three quarters of the exports of Bulgaria. KRIB HAS A MISSION: to raise the compe﬒ ﬒ veness of the Bulgarian economy and the companies opera﬒ ng in Bulgaria to be most eff ec﬒ ve in the process of improving the business climate in the country to assist its members in sharing best business prac﬒ ces, benefi ﬒ ng from the EU membership, going regional and global to encourage the corporate social responsibili﬑ best prac﬒ ces of its members. KRIB IS AN ACTIVE PARTNER IN THE SOCIAL DIALOGUE: has representa﬒ ves in the social dialog on na﬒ onal, sectoral, regional and European level presents opinions on dra﬎ laws in the Bulgarian Parliament is a member of the Na﬒ onal Council for Tripar﬒ te Coopera﬒ on and its commissions its Chairman is Depu﬑ -Chairman of the Na﬒ onal Council for Tripar﬒ te Coopera﬒ on. KRIB HAS STRONG REGIONAL AND BRANCH STRUCTURES: operates 113 regional representa﬒ ons all over the country unites 65 branch organiza﬒ ons in all economic sectors THE VOICE OF BULGARIAN BUSINESS has 10 intersectoral commi﬐ ees that coordinate the interests of its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Uluslararasi Balkanlarda Türk V Arligi Sempozyumu - Ii
    ULUSLARARASI BALKANLARDA TÜRK V ARLIGI SEMPOZYUMU - II BiLDiRiLER ll. CİLT Y ayına Hazırlayan: Yrd.Doç.Dr. Ünal ŞENEL T.C CELAL BAY AR ill-1VERSİTESİ Manisa Yöresi Tüd{ Tarih ve Kültürünü Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Yayını Manisa 2010 ULUSLARARASI BALKANLARDA TÜRK V ARLIGI SEMPOZYUMU-Il BİLDİRİLER ll. Cilt Yayma Hazırlayan: Yrd.Doç.Dr.Ünal ŞENEL © Celal Bayar Üniversitesi iSBN 978~975 ~ 8628-13- 1 978-975-8628-15-5 • Bu. kitapta yer alan bildirilerdeki bilgi, fıkir ve hükümlerin yanısıra kullanılan dile iJişk:in tüm sorumluluk sadece bildiri sahiplerine aittir. B askı: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Matbaası Manisa2010 SOFYA'dald SOFU MEHMED PAŞA CAMİSİ (KARA CAMİ)'nin KİLİSEYE DÖNÜŞTÜRÜLMEsr Aşkın Koyuncu•• Sofya'daki Kara Cami'nin kiliseye çevrilmesi meselesi münferit olarak bir İslam mabedinin Hıristiyan mabedine dönüştüriilmesinden çok Bulgaristan'da Osmanlı mirasının tasfiyesi bağlamında ele alınması gereken bir konudur. Balkanlarda ulus devletlerin kuruluşu, Osmanlı geçmişi ile büyük bir kopuş yaşanmasına ve siyasi, idan, sosyal, ekonomik, kültürel, demografik ve dini alanlara nüfuz eden Osmanlı mirasının reddedilmesine sebep olmuştur. 1 Nitekim 1878'de özerk bir prenslik olarak kurulan Bulgaristan'da da saf bir ulusal kimlik inşası ve Hıristiyan Bulgar kültürünün ikamesi sürecinde Osmanlı mirasının tasfiyesi Avrupalıtaşmanın ön koşulu olarak algılanmış ve Bulgar modemleşme si en başından bir "deosmanizatsiya (Osmanlılıktan arınma)" hareketi şeklinde gelişmiştir? Bu hareket en çok maddi kültür varlıklarının tasfiyesinde kendisini göstermiş ve şehirlerin fiziksel yapısı, mimarisi ve görünümü Osmanlı sorırasında hızlı bir değişim sürecine girmiştir. 3 Kara Cami'nin kaderinde de bu anlay ı ş belirleyici olmuştur. Şehirler kimliklerini hakim devletin ideolojisinden ve üzerinde yaşayan insanların kültür ve medeniyetinden alırlar.
    [Show full text]
  • Genov (New Bulgarian University)
    BULGARIAʼS ENTRY AND PARTICIPATION OF IN WORLD WAR I AS SEEN BY THE BRITISH JOURNALIST JAMES D. BOUCHIER Prof. Dr. Roumen Genov (New Bulgarian University) ! The press in modern times, had risen to the position of major cultural and political factor, and played important propaganda role in all stages of wars, their preparation, waging and post-war settlement. That is especially valid of the British press which came to a position to exercise vast influence over popular opinion. In his political novel “Coningsby”, published in 1844, the great statesman and author Benjamin Disraeli declaimed: “Opinion now is supreme, and the opinion speaks in print. The representation of the press is more complete than the representation of Parliament”. At the same time new journalism entered the scene with enhanced sense of self-confidence and mission. John Thaddeus Delane (who occupied the post of editor of The Times for thirty-six years from 1841, and had built its reputation), was clear in 1852 of the principle: “The duty of the Press is to speak; of the statesmen to be silent”.1 The custodians of the printed word referred to themselves as “the Press”, with capital letter, that denoted a formal collective entity analogous to the Parliament.2 ! The influence of the press was even more increased due its emancipation from state control (the removal of all duties on newspapers, or the “taxes on knowledge” as Richard Cobden called them, by the mid-1850s), the technological advance in printing and distribution, which gave rise to the mass press, that reached millions
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria Archivo C I E M - Madrid
    2012 La Masonería en el mundo – Bulgaria Archivo C I E M - Madrid Documentación - países Adrian Mac Liman Centro Ibérico de Estudios Masónicos (CIEM) 06/06/2012 Bulgaria's Freemasons - from Bogomils to the Failed 21st Century Project Author: Maria Guineva May 28, 2010 Several Bulgarian Freemasons have been interviewed for this story and their opinions are included below. Most, however, spoke only under condition of remaining anonymous. Dimitar Nedkov is considered by many the top expert on Freemasonry in Bulgaria. He was initiated into one of the first Bulgarian Blue Lodges shortly after the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe in the early 1990s. He is an active participant in the restoration of Freemasonry in Bulgaria and has served as Grand Chaplain of the Grand Lodge of Bulgaria. Nedkov is a Mason 33 Degree (the highest), co-founder of the Supreme Council, 33 of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite, former Grand Orator of the Grand Lodge of the Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons in Bulgaria. An avid Masonic scholar, he is the author of “The Freemasons Returned to Bulgaria” (1998) and “The Third Millennium of Freemasonry” (2000), “The Lessons of Freemasonry (2005). His last book, a fiction - “33 The Menace Dan Brown” appeared on the book stands in December. One of the founders of the Masonic magazine Svetlina (Light) and the web site freemasonry.bg. Nedkov is a member of the International Academy of the Illuminati in Rome The article below is also based on Nedkov’s book “The Freemasons Returned to Bulgaria” and the book “Masonic Lodges in Bulgaria” by Dr.
    [Show full text]