DOCSLIB.ORG

Request for Proposals for Operation of Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Request for Proposals for Operation of Union REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OPERATION OF UNION STATION, VAN NUYS, AND ORANGE LINE FLYAWAY BUS SERVICE Release Date: November 20, 2014 Pre-Proposal Conference: December 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time Los Angeles World Airports Administration West Building 7301 World Way West, Room 420 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Deadline for Submission of Questions/Requests for Clarification: Submit all questions and requests for clarification in writing to [email protected] no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time on December 10, 2014 Proposal Due Date: January 22, 2015 no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time at: Commercial Development Attn: Christine Kalamaros 6053 W. Century Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90045 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 A. THE OPPORTUNITY .............................................................................. 3 SECTION 2 – BACKGROUND INFORMATION .......................................................... 4 A. LAWA ..................................................................................................... 4 B. DESCRIPTION OF LAX ......................................................................... 4 C. DESCRIPTION OF FLYAWAY FACILITIES ........................................... 4 D. FLEET .................................................................................................... 5 E. FARES ................................................................................................... 5 F. CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS ............................................................... 6 G. ADDITIONAL DATA AND INFORMATION ............................................. 6 SECTION 3 – THE AGREEMENT WITH LAWA .......................................................... 7 A. TERM OF THE AGREEMENT ................................................................ 7 B. COMPENSATION TO FLYAWAY OPERATOR ...................................... 7 C. COLLECTION AND DELIVERY OF LAWA REVENUE........................... 8 D. EXPECTED SERVICE LEVELS ............................................................. 8 E. FACILITIES AVAILABLE TO PROPOSER ............................................. 9 F. AGREEMENT EXECUTION ................................................................. 10 SECTION 4 – PROPOSAL EVALUATION PROCESS .............................................. 11 A. EVALUATION CRITERIA ..................................................................... 11 SECTION 5 – INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS ..................................................... 13 A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ................................................................. 13 B. PROPOSAL BOND .............................................................................. 13 C. PRE-POSAL CONFERENCE ............................................................... 14 D. SUBMISSION OF QUESTIONS ........................................................... 14 E. VERIFICATION OF PRIOR CITY CONTRACTS .................................. 14 F. CONTRACT AWARD............................................................................ 15 G. VALIDITY OF PROPOSALS ................................................................ 15 H. INSTRUCTIONS FOR PART ONE OF THE SUBMITTAL .................... 15 SECTION 6 – ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS ................................................. 26 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ......................................................................................... 27 2 SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION A. THE OPPORTUNITY Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), a department of the City of Los Angeles (City), is seeking proposals from qualified transportation providers for the operation of LAWA’s FlyAway scheduled bus service between Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and three locations: 1) Los Angeles Union Station (Union Station); 2) Van Nuys FlyAway Bus Terminal (Van Nuys); and 3) Metro Orange Line Woodley Station (Orange Line) which, subject to required approvals, will be a new FlyAway site along the Van Nuys FlyAway route. The successful Proposer from this Request for Proposals (RFP) will be responsible for providing scheduled bus service, selling tickets, establishing and providing revenue control procedures, deploying a bus fleet, and staffing the operation. LAWA’s goal, through this RFP, is to award an Operating Agreement (Agreement) to a qualified and experienced proposer with a proven track record of providing excellent transportation service and a positive passenger experience while minimizing LAWA’s costs to provide the service. By combining the three FlyAway sites under one Agreement, LAWA expects the Flyaway Operator to optimize operational efficiency, including better utilization of fleet, staff and resources, which will ultimately result in an improved customer experience and lower cost of service to LAWA. As described in the Agreement, the contractor (FlyAway Operator) will remit all revenue from the sale of tickets and passes to LAWA. The FlyAway Operator will invoice LAWA on a monthly basis: 1) a fixed management fee; 2) a fee per each completed trip, less penalties for service shortfalls; and 3) approved pass-thru costs for transaction processing. This RFP provides specific instructions regarding proposal format and other requirements. Pertinent data about the specific operations and LAX are also included. 3 SECTION 2 – BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. LAWA LAWA is a financially self-sufficient, proprietary department of the City of Los Angeles. LAWA operates, maintains and develops LAX, LA/Ontario International Airport, and Van Nuys Airport. LAWA is controlled by the Board of Airport Commissioners (Board), a seven-member board appointed by the Mayor subject to approval by City Council. B. DESCRIPTION OF LAX In 2013, LAX ranked as the sixth busiest passenger airport in the world with more than 67 million total passengers. LAX is the second busiest origination and destination airport in the world. Historical passenger traffic statistics for all LAX terminals and airlines may be found at the LAWA Web Site: http://www.lawa.aero/welcome_lax.aspx?id=798. LAX occupies approximately 3,500 acres and is located approximately 15 miles southwest of the Los Angeles central business district. The terminal complex features nine passenger terminals connected by a U-shaped two-level roadway. The upper-level roadway is designated as the departure-level and provides access to each terminal. The lower-level roadway is designated as the arrivals level and also provides access to each terminal and parking structures. FlyAway bus service is currently provided at sixteen locations on the airport roadway: eight stops for drop-off only on the upper level and eight stops for pick-up only on the lower lever. C. DESCRIPTION OF FLYAWAY FACILITIES Union Station: Union Station FlyAway service operates from Patsaouras Transit Plaza (Transit Plaza) located within the Union Station facility at 810 North Vignes Street in Los Angeles, as depicted in Attachment A. The Transit Plaza includes a FlyAway bus bay for the dropping off and picking up of passengers, a passenger waiting area, and a multi-story parking facility. There is currently a ticket kiosk available for Flyaway operations and seven Metrolink-operated ticket vending machines (TVM) located near the Transit Plaza from which FlyAway passes may be purchased. Custodial, security, and parking management services are provided by Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) as well as vending and concession opportunities. The availability and use of Union Station facilities are limited and subject to the terms of the Right of Entry agreement between LAWA and MTA as provided in Attachment B. In the event one or more of the Union Station facilities becomes unavailable during the term of the Agreement, LAWA will work with the Proposer to find alternate facilities. Modification of MTA property, including installation of additional TVMs, is prohibited. Availability and use of TVM machines is subject to an agreement with Metrolink as provided in Attachment C. Van Nuys: Van Nuys FlyAway service operates from LAWA’s FlyAway Bus Terminal (Bus Terminal) located at 7610 Woodley Avenue in Van Nuys, as depicted on Attachment D. The Bus Terminal includes a dedicated bus depot with six bays and three staging positions, a 4 terminal building, a multi-story semi-automated parking structure, and a surface employee parking lot. There are currently seven ticket vending machines located at the Bus Terminal location which are owned and operated by the current FlyAway bus service vendor. Vending machines and concession opportunities are controlled by LAWA. Custodial and security management services are provided by LAWA. A separate vendor provides parking management services. Orange Line: The Orange Line FlyAway site, subject to required approvals, will be located approximately 1.5 miles south of the Van Nuys FlyAway Bus Terminal on the south side of Victory Boulevard east of Woodley Avenue and will include a bus bay, bus shelter and sidewalk, for passengers boarding the southbound FlyAway bus to LAX. Passengers unloading from the northbound FlyAway bus from LAX, will exit on the east side of Woodley Avenue, north of Victory Boulevard at an existing Metro bus stop. See Attachment D-1. There will be no accommodation for private vehicle parking. The anticipated start date for Orange Line FlyAway service is July 2015. Layover at LAX: LAWA will provide the FlyAway Operator with a bus layover area on LAWA property. The Commercial Vehicle
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025)
    ten-year bus fleet management plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 TRANSIT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSIT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE TYPES ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 BUS SERVICE TYPE & LINE IDENTIFICATION......................................................................... 14 1.4 PROGRAMMED TRANSIT PROJECTS..................................................................................... 16 1.5 TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP)................................................................................................ 31 1.6 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS)........................................ 31 2.0 VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 33 2.1 GENERAL FLEET STATISTICS ................................................................................................. 33 2.2 SPARE RATIO ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.3 CONTINGENCY FLEET ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Orange Line
    Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Access Pass (Tap) & Rail Fare Gate Status
    Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.922.9200 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.9201 Fax rnetro.net 41 REVISED OPERATIONS COMMITTEE APRIL 16,2009 SUBJECT: TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP) & RAIL FARE GATE STATUS ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report on the Transit Access Pass (TAP) and Rail Fare Gate Status ISSUE TAP staff was directed to provide a regular status update of project milestones and deployment activities on the Transit Access Pass (TAP@)regional smart card. Also, with the inception of the Metro Rail Fare Gate project, staff was directed to report monthly on the progress of this project. This report serves to fulfd these requests. DISCUSSION There has been significant progress on TAP regional implementation: Municipal Operators - Culver CityBus and Santa Clarita Transit have successfully migrated their UFS systems with full TAP capabilities. Norwalk successfully installed UFS fareboxes with TAP capability on April 3. Foothill, Gardena, and Montebello are in the process of conversion between May and June, 2009. Reduced Fare TAP - Over 60,000 Senior, Disabled, and College/Vocational TAP cards have been produced and mailed to applicants. Day Pass - TAP cards, equipment, and supplies delivered to divisions for scheduled day pass conversion to TAP on March 15. At the point of writing this Board report, the conversion process has gone fairly uneventfully with the exception of card volumes requiring replenishment at bus divisions since customer education and training to re-cycle cards on subsequent usage needs further reinforcement. Metro Pass Sales Outlets - compact point of sales devices have been installed at over 400 pass sales outlets and additional devices are currently being installed at Cities and Senior Centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017
    Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017 City of Montebello Transportation Department City of Montebello – Transportation Department FY 2015 - 2017 SHORT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Table of Contents SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSIT SYSTEM 1.1 History of the City of Montebello and Montebello Bus Lines ................................ 3 1.2 Governance and Organizational Structure ............................................................. 4 1.3 Transit Services and Areas Served .......................................................................... 5 1.4 Ridership ................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Fare Structure ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Fleet, Facility and Equipment ................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 – BUDGET, FUNDING, AND REGULATION 2.1 Operating and Capital Budget............................................................................... 10 2.2 Funding Sources.................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Regulatory Requirements ..................................................................................... 11 SECTION 3 – ACCOMPLISHMENTS, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3.1 Past Accomplishments........................................................................................... 13 3.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torrance Bus Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies
    TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master In Urban and Regional Planning By Jose M. Perez 2019 i SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AUTHOR: Jose M. Perez DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2019 Department of Urban and Regional Planning Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta Project Committee Chair Professor of Urban Planning Richard Zimmer Committee Member Lecturer of Urban Planning David Mach Senior Transportation Planner Torrance Transit i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks the Torrance Transit Employees for the data they furnished and their participation in the client project, especially Senior Transportation Planner David Mach. The author would also like to thank the City of Torrance for providing information on future development and specific goals of their circulation plan. Special thanks to Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta and Professor Richard Zimmer for their help and guidance in completing the client project. i ABSTRACT A city’s transportation infrastructure directly affects the mobility of the people, goods, and services, of all who live within its’ limits. Bus transit lines are a key element of a balanced transportation system that can improve or detract from the quality of life of its’ populous. Transit networks that are poorly implemented eventually become impractical and difficult to maintain; and thus, a burden upon the city it’s meant to help. In addition the service reliability of a transit line is critical to both the transit agency and its users in order to maintain a healthy transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bike Share Implementation Plan
    Regional Bike Share Implementation FOR LOS ANGELES Plan COUNTY PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 April 22, 2015 [This page intentionally blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 Business Plan .............................................................................................. 8 Vision ............................................................................................................................ 9 System Overview ...................................................................................................13 Capital Ownership .................................................................................................14 Operations Model .................................................................................................14 Fare Structure..........................................................................................................14 TAP Integration ......................................................................................................19 Mobility Hubs Coordination .............................................................................23 Equity .........................................................................................................................25 Operations Funding..............................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Operations Committee J U L Y 2 6 , 2 0
    SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JULY 26, 2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY ROSTER SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE COUNTY MEMBER San Bernardino: Paul Eaton (Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Montclair Larry McCallon Mayor, City of Highland Riverside: Karen Spiegel (Vice Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Corona Andrew Kotyuk Councilmember, City of San Jacinto Orange: Shawn Nelson 1 vote Supervisor, 4th District County of Orange Los Angeles: Richard Katz 1 vote Metro Appointee Don Knabe Supervisor, 4th District County of Los Angeles Robert T. Bartlett Metro Appointee Tom Lackey Mayor Pro Tem, City of Palmdale Ventura: Brian Humphrey 1 vote Commission Member VCTC One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2013 10:00 A.M. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY UNION STATION CONFERENCE ROOM ONE GATEWAY PLAZA, 3RD FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 AGENDA DESCRIPTIONS The agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public and a brief general description of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the recommended actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Committee may take any action that it deems appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the notice of the recommended action. The Chair reserves the right to discuss the items listed on the agenda in any order. A person with a disability may contact the Committee Secretary's office at (213) 452-0219 or via e-mail [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to request receipt of an agenda in an alternative format or to request disability-related accommodations, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda Report
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Date: January 17, 2017 TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Michael J. Egan, City Manager BY: James C. Parker, Director of Transportation Theresa Clark, Manager of Strategic Planning and Administrative Services SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT TRIENNIAL SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017-2019 Background: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is required by Federal and State statutes to prepare a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Los Angeles County. The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) facilitates input from each municipal transit agency, including Norwalk Transit System (NTS), on its planning and financial activities for inclusion into the Los Angeles County TIP. The SRTP/TIP serves as a formal record of both Metro and NTS’ commitment to transit services/projects and are mandatory components of the federal funding process. It is the responsibility of Metro to review each municipal transit operator’s SRTP to ensure that all Federal, State and Local reporting requirements are achieved; data collection efforts are coordinated and operator budgets are consistent with funding assumptions and regional planning policies. The SRTP is NTS’s primary planning document, and is updated on a triennial basis (financial tables must be submitted annually) according to guidelines issued by Metro. It describes the organizational structure in keeping with current and planned service changes over three years. Also, descriptions of the financial and capital improvements associated with major projects/programs are included as a reference for various internal and external stakeholders. Fiscal Impact: N/A Citizens Advised: N/A City Council January 17, 2017 Authorization to Submit Triennial Short Range Transit Plan Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Employer Annual Pass Program
    Metro Employer Annual Pass Program Metro offers Employer Annual Pass Programs that are a high-value benefit and help to improve employee morale, health and attendance. Employers and employees may qualify for Commuter Benefits, which will significantly reduce the cost of the employee pass and act as a business tax benefit for the employer. Metro Annual Transit Access Pass (ATAP) • Fare is pre-loaded annually and is good for the entire fiscal year Uuly-June) • Practically eliminates the administrative processing burden • Maximizes accessibility to transit for employees with EZ pass options • Provides peace of mind and control over passes • Includes a photo ID to help protect your investment • Employer Size (3 or more) Metro Employer Pass Program CE-Pass) • Ride everything that Metro owns and operates 2417, including Metro local buses, Metro Rapid buses and Metro rail • The employer can use E-Pass as a great way to recruit and retain talented employees and improve employee morale • Metro loves E-Pass because it introduces the non-rider to our system and increases ridership • Employer Size (50 or more) Metro Small Employer Pass Program (SEP) • Annual group rate for small to medium employers (249 or less) • Participation requirement is 50% of total employees (default minimum may apply) @ • Unlimited use on all Metro Bus, Metro Rail, Express and Silver Line • Includes a photo ID to help protect your investment • Helps reduce parking demand and expense To find out how you can partner with Metro and become an Employer Annual Pass Program client, please reguest more information (httQs://metrola.wufoo.com/forms/m1 cx0f9Q1 ixow34/) or call 213.922.7983 and a Metro annual transit pass expert will gladly assist you.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Outlook
    2053.3 For Action Update: 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Outlook Date: May 12, 2021 To: TTC Board From: Chief Strategy and Customer Officer Summary The purpose of this report to provide an update on the development of TTC’s 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Strategy (Fare Policy and Collection Strategy). This report will outline the emerging insights from Phase 1 of the Fare Policy work stream and the proposed policy goals that will guide the development of a modernized fare collection system for the TTC and YRT. In addition, this report will provide the key learnings from stakeholder engagement, peer transit agency reviews and the TTC’s Automated Fare Collection Technology Request for Information (RFI), which closed on February 5, 2021. These key learnings from both the Fare Policy and Collection Strategy work streams will provide the basis for testing and modelling fare structures and viable fare collection options in the next phase of work. The potential fare policy and fare collection options will be presented to the Board in July 2021. Recommendations It is recommended that the TTC Board: 1. Endorse the proposed fare policy goals and objectives in Attachment 1 of this report to inform the development of fare options to be presented to the Board in July 2021; 2. Receive the results of the RFI and peer agency reviews in Attachments 2 and 3 of this report to inform the development of viable fare collection models to be presented to the Board in July 2021; and 3. Proceed with demonstrations from RFI respondents beginning with System Integrator vendors, to present their solutions to the TTC prior to the July Board meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Finance/Budget Department
    Adopted Budget July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016 Table of Contents 1 BUILDING OUR MOBILITY 2 > Message from the CEO 4 > Board of Directors 6 > Organizational Chart 10 OVERVIEW 12 > Metro (LACMTA) 14 > Transit Expansion Timeline 16 > Improved Transit Service 18 > Delivering Transit & Highway Projects 22 > State of Good Repair 24 > Sustainability 26 > Congestion Management 27 > Budget Summary 28 BUDGET DETAILS 30 > Resources 32 > Expenditures 34 > Enterprise Fund 36 > Capital Program 38 > Regional Subsidy Funding Programs 40 > Congestion Management 42 > Debt 44 > Fund Balances & Governmental Fund Financial Statements 46 > Measure R 48 > Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) 52 APPENDICES 54 > Appendix I: Service Statistics 56 > Appendix II: Activity Based Bus Cost Model 58 > Appendix III: Activity Based Rail Cost Model 60 > Appendix IV: Capital Program Project Listing 62 > Appendix V: Regional Transit Allocations 70 > Appendix VI: Subsidies to Local Agencies 72 > Appendix VII: Legally Separate Entities 74 > Appendix VIII: Los Angeles County Subregions & Supervisory Districts 76 ABBREVIATIONS 78 Building our Mobility 4 Message from the CEO With the benefit of visionary and generous voters, our county has strong local support for transportation, including the most recent sales tax, Measure R, which passed in 2008 at the beginning of the Great Recession. This measure and past voter support makes possible the construction we see today, and keeps Metro fares among the lowest of any major transit system in the U.S. But we’re not going it alone. Last year, we secured more than $3 billion in federal support, including approximately $2 billion in federal New Starts money and more than $1 billion in low- interest TIFIA loans for Phase 1 of the Westside Purple Line Subway and the Regional Connector.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles City Guide: How to Prepare for a Successful Summer in Los Angeles, CA the Resources in This Guide Are for Informational Purposes Only
    Career Advancement Los Angeles City Guide: How to Prepare for a Successful Summer in Los Angeles, CA The resources in this guide are for informational purposes only. Career Advancement does not endorse or guarantee any of the services described in this document. Students should exercise their own discretion when planning for their summer internship. If you would like more information or have questions about this document, feel free to speak with a Career Advancement adviser. You can make an appointment on UChicago Handshake. 4. Politely ask your employer about housing resources. Your L.A. Housing Overview employer may have suggestions for where to live, or give Whether you are craving some relaxation at the beach, you the contact information of other interns who are spending time outdoors, or checking out the culture and searching for housing so that you can room together or get cuisine, L.A. has it all! advice from each other. L.A. has been a popular location for summer internships and Online Housing Resources provides a great opportunity to explore what it is like to live in There are a variety of online housing resources that provide a different city. The type of housing you’re looking for, your short-term housing vacancies, including: budget, and your connections in L.A. are all factors that should help determine where you begin your housing search. http://losangeles.craigslist.org/ The earlier you begin looking, the more options you will have https://www.airbnb.com/s/Los-Angeles--CA and the easier it will be to choose exactly where you want to http://losangeles.apartments.com/ live for the summer.
    [Show full text]