DOCSLIB.ORG

Signature Redacted

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Implementation of Multimodal Electronic Payment Systems: Lessons from Los Angeles and Minneapolis-St. Paul By Emily Long BA in Cellular Neuroscience Colgate University Hamilton, New York (2010) Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2017 2017 Emily Long. All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of the thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known r hereafter created. Author Signature redacted Department of Urban Sttkefiand ( Planning Signature redacted y 24, 2017) Certified by Sarah Williams Assistant Professor of Technology and Urban Planning Department of Urban Studies and Planning Signature redacted Thesis Supervisor Accepted by MASSACUTS ILNSTITUTE As ia P fessor P. Christopher Zegras OF TECHNOLOGY Chair, MCP Committee JUN 14 2017 Department of Urban Studies and Planning LIBRARIES ARCHIVES Implementation of Multimodal Electronic Payment Systems: Lessons from Los Angeles and Minneapolis-St. Paul By: Emily Long Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 24, 2017 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning ABSTRACT Adoption of technology in the public sector typically involves a balance of willingness to take on risk and the development of a forward-thinking agenda (Mulgan & Albury, 2003). Technology adoption in the public transportation sector follows this process and as a result, adoption can occur long after the technology is available. As in other sectors, technology has and continues to transform transportation in the US and around the world. Shared mobility services like bikeshare, carshare, and ride- sourcing services are now part of many cities' mobility ecosystem, adding to the traditional modes of public transit, cabs, and private cars. Accessing these different modal options, however, require different payment media and separate mobile apps for each system to plan and pay for travel, thus creating a fragmented user experience. Technological change in existing payment systems, specifically, unified or integrated payment systems, could improve the user experience and reduce the barriers to adoption of more modes of transport-including those that might be more sustainable. While integrated payment, or multimodal payment convergence, appears to be a hot topic among policymakers and practitioners, implementation in US cities has been limited. In my research, I seek to understand the potential barriers to and drivers of multimodal payment technology, studying the adoption of these systems in two regions, Los Angeles and Minneapolis-St. Paul. The research uses literature in the adoption of technology in transportation to contextualize the case studies in Los Angeles and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Through the exploration of these two cases, the research provides evidence that while payment technology has matured to enable multimodal payment systems, institutional factors such as limited coordination between public and private operators and organizational resource constraints remain barriers to implementation. However, incremental collaboration, vocal advocates, and federal funding support for multimodal payment systems might be used as strategies to overcome these barriers. Thesis Supervisor: Sarah Williams, Ph.D. Title: Assistant Professor of Technology and Urban Planning Thesis Reader: Joseph Ferreira, Ph.D. Title: Professor 1 3 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Sarah Williams for her help and invaluable advice throughout my time at DUSP. Without her, I would not have been able to complete this thesis. I would also like to thank my friends for their support and levity throughout this process. Super special thanks to my best friend, and my partner in crime, Graham Kelly, for taking the scenic route through life with me. Finally, my deepest appreciation to my mother and my late father, for all the sacrifices they have made for me. Their endless love and support make me who I am today. I dedicate this thesis to them. Acknowledgements | 4 Table of Contents A B ST RA CT .................................................................................................................................................... 3 A cknow ledgem ents................................................................................................................................... 4 Table of C ontents ....................................................................................................................................... 5 CH A PT ER : Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 8 H ypothesis and R esearch Q uestions ...................................................................................... 9 M otivation ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Sustainable m obility ....................................................................................................................... 9 T he burden of ansf s ............................................................................................................. 10 Electronic Paym ent System s.................................................................................................... 10 Im plem entation in public transit ...................................................................................... 11 B enefits.............................................................................................................................................. 11 Implem entation in other transportation services ...................................................... 11 M ultim odal paym ents convergence................................................................................. 12 R esearch M ethods ............................................................................................................................. 12 Introduction to Case Studies.................................................................................................... 13 T hesis O verview ................................................................................................................................. 13 CH A PT ER II: Literature Review .................................................................................................... 15 Challenges of M ultim odal Travel ........................................................................................... 15 Types of integration.......................................................................................................................... 16 Evidence for the Need of Multimodal Payment Systems.............................................. 17 B enefits of transit sm art cards ........................................................................................... 17 Em erging trends............................................................................................................................ 18 Current Electronic Paym ent System s ................................................................................... 19 Sm art cards...................................................................................................................................... 19 M obile ticketing ............................................................................................................................. 20 Contactless bankcards ................................................................................................................ 21 Architecture of Electronic Fare Payment Systems ......................................................... 21 Closed versus open paym ent .............................................................................................. 21 Table of Contents | 5 Card-based versus account-based.................................................................................... 22 Implementation Barriers to Multimodal Payment Convergence ............................. 23 T e ch n ica l........................................................................................................................................... 2 3 Innovation adoption by transit systems ......................................................................... 25 Influence of institutional factors on multimodal payment convergence.......... 27 F in an cial b arriers.......................................................................................................................... 2 9 CHAPTER III: Case Study I Minneapolis-St. Paul................................................................. 31 O v e rv iew ................................................................................................................................................ 3 1 Existing public transportation system............................................................................ 31 Transport mode share ................................................................................................................ 34 Multimodal Payment Convergence ....................................................................................... 36 Metro Transit's smart card: The Go-To Card .............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025)

    Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025)

    ten-year bus fleet management plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 TRANSIT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSIT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE TYPES ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 BUS SERVICE TYPE & LINE IDENTIFICATION......................................................................... 14 1.4 PROGRAMMED TRANSIT PROJECTS..................................................................................... 16 1.5 TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP)................................................................................................ 31 1.6 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS)........................................ 31 2.0 VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 33 2.1 GENERAL FLEET STATISTICS ................................................................................................. 33 2.2 SPARE RATIO ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.3 CONTINGENCY FLEET ..........................................................................................................
  • CONNECTING the RARITAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rutgers University Bloustein School of Policy and Planning | Fall 2016 Graduate Studio

    CONNECTING the RARITAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rutgers University Bloustein School of Policy and Planning | Fall 2016 Graduate Studio

    RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BIKE SHARE CONNECTING THE RARITAN HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Rutgers University Bloustein School of Policy and Planning | Fall 2016 Graduate Studio ABOUT THE STUDIO This studio project is an analysis of the health impacts of the We met with Bloustein professors, with planning professionals, potential new Bike Share program planned for the Rutgers-New and with the organizers and staff of bike shares across the coun- Brunswick community. It builds upon our client’s – the Rutgers try in order to ask questions and gain invaluable advice on how University Department of Institutional Planning and Opera- to proceed with our analysis. We used this collected knowledge tion (IPO) – Internal Bicycle Share Proposal. The IPO report to build impact projections and develop a list of actionable rec- highlighted existing bicycle infrastructure, robust public trans- ommendations targeted at maximizing positive health outcomes portation infrastructure, and the high concentration of bicycle while mitigating health concerns. commuters in the study area as support for their proposal. This studio expanded on that analysis by examining the physical, This studio course is intended to advance the goals of Healthier mental, social, and economic health of the users and residents New Brunswick, a network of partners in the City of New Bruns- of Rutgers campus and the surrounding areas. Our targeted wick that are working together to ensure that all residents have audience for this analysis was people who currently do not bike; equal access to the services and conditions that allow for good we paid close attention to equity issues and vulnerable popula- health and well-being.
  • BIKE SHARE in LOS ANGELES COUNTY an Analysis of LA Metro Bike Share and Santa Monica Breeze

    BIKE SHARE in LOS ANGELES COUNTY an Analysis of LA Metro Bike Share and Santa Monica Breeze

    BIKE SHARE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY An analysis of LA Metro Bike Share and Santa Monica Breeze visit us at scag.ca.gov ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Prepared for Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) On behalf of Los Angeles Country Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) BY ALTA PLANNING + DESIGN Jean Crowther, AICP Michael Jones Mike Sellinger WITH MOORE & ASSOCIATES Jim Moore Erin Kenneally Kathy Chambers SPECIAL THANKS TO City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation City of Santa Monica City of West Hollywood Bicycle Transit Systems CycleHop And the many community members who gave their time and energy to participate in our outreach efforts and whose insights added to the value and relevance of this study and its recommendations. TABLE OF CONTENTS 01 PROJECT PURPOSE AND GOALS ..............................1 02 A TALE OF TWO SYSTEMS ..........................................3 03 WHAT THE DATA TELLS US ........................................5 04 WHAT COMMUNITY MEMBERS TELL US .................19 05 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FUTURE .................27 APPENDICES A - Technology Integration Memo B - Statistical Analysis Methodology and Find- ings C - Agency & Operator Interview Questions D - User Survey E - Survey Results LA BIKE SHARE STUDY 01 PROJECT PURPOSE AND GOALS The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), in The study centered on five core phases of analysis: partnership with Los Angeles Metro (Metro), commissioned a • User Survey: An online and intercept survey targeted existing study to better understand the role of bike share within the Los bike share users, available for 2 months in spring of 2019, Angeles regional transportation system. The results are intended which garnered 351 valid responses (201 from Metro users to guide decision-making related to future system investments and 150 from Santa Monica users) and provided a 95 percent and new shared mobility programs in the region.
  • SEPTA Quick Trip Flexibility Expands on Market-Frankford & Broad

    SEPTA Quick Trip Flexibility Expands on Market-Frankford & Broad

    Contact: Andrew Busch Chief Press Officer SEPTA Quick Trip Flexibility Expands on Market-Frankford & Broad Street Lines Start & Return Quick Trip Tickets Can Now Be Purchased Together PHILADELPHIA (October 5, 2017) – As part of the continuing expansion of the SEPTA Key, SEPTA is adding more flexibility for riders who use Quick Trip tickets for travel on the Market-Frankford (MFL) and Broad Street (BSL) Lines. Starting Friday, Oct. 6, customers can purchase one-way Quick Trip tickets for travel at any MFL/BSL station for use at any MFL/BSL station. This will allow customers the flexibility to buy two Quick Trips at one time – one for the start of their trip, and the second for their return trip. All Quick Trip tickets must be used on the date of purchase. Until now, Quick Trips have only been valid for one-way travel from the station where the ticket was purchased. This added convenience allows customers to purchase Quick Trips for both legs of their trip in one transaction at a SEPTA Key Fare Kiosk. SEPTA Key Fare Kiosks are located at all Broad Street and Market-Frankford Line stations. Launched in fall 2016, the Quick Trip is a single-ride, magnetic stripe ticket for Market-Frankford and Broad Street Line service. A Quick Trip is $2.50, the same as SEPTA’s regular cash fare. The Quick Trip has added flexibility for riders by allowing them to use credit and debit cards for single- trip travel. The kiosks also give customers change if they use cash and don't have exact fare.
  • Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-Of-The-Practice Scan

    Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the-Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center COVER PHOTO Courtesy of Edwin Adilson Rodriguez, Federal Transit Administration DISCLAIMER This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Mobility Payment Integration: State-of-the- Practice Scan OCTOBER 2019 FTA Report No. 0143 PREPARED BY Ingrid Bartinique and Joshua Hassol Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway, Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/research-innovation FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i Metric Conversion Table SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liter L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg megagrams T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 Mg (or “t”) (or “metric ton”) TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) o 5 (F-32)/9 o F Fahrenheit Celsius C or (F-32)/1.8 FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION i FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No.
  • Metro Bike Share Business Plan

    Metro Bike Share Business Plan

    Metro Bike Share 19-20 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Bike Share Implementation Plan and Business Model ........................................................................... 4 Revised Business Model and Plan............................................................................................................ 4 Current Policy ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Regional Bike Share Vision ............................................................................................................................ 5 Metro Bike Share a form of Transportation ............................................................................................ 5 Current Status ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Operating Locations ................................................................................................................................. 6 Performance Data .................................................................................................................................... 6 Performance Measures ................................................................................................................................
  • The Smart City Observer

    The Smart City Observer

    Equity Research Global Industrial Infrastructure May 23, 2019 Industry Report Louie DiPalma, CFA +1 312 364 5437 [email protected] The Smart City Observer Please refer to important disclosures on pages 13 and 14. Analyst certification is on page 13. William Blair or an affiliate does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. This report is not intended to provide personal investment advice. The opinions and recommendations here- in do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommen- dations of particular securities, financial instruments, or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. William Blair Overview “Smart city” technology innovations and regulatory developments are occurring at a rapid pace. In The Smart City Observer, we observe how cities are using sensors to observe (monitor) and automate processes across transportation, security, and payments. We analyze leading smart city technologies related to our coverage of AeroVironment, Cubic, FLIR, and Verra Mobility that in- clude connected car, public transit payments, vehicle payments that use surveillance technologies (for deliveries and safety), facial recognition surveillance, and urban surveillance (safe city). The key(tolling/red-light themes that we cameras/speed highlight are ascameras), follows. congestion and traffic management, drones/robotics • Recent M&A activity in surveillance, transportation tech, and payments has been robust, with vendors positioning themselves to take advantage of a surge in urban RFPs and innovation.
  • Los Angeles Orange Line

    Los Angeles Orange Line

    Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S.
  • Regional Rail

    Regional Rail

    STATION LOCATIONS CONNECTING SERVICES * SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS and MAJOR HOLIDAYS PHILADELPHIA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT TERMINALS E and F 37, 108, 115 )DUH 6HUYLFHV 7UDLQ1XPEHU AIRPORT INFORMATION AIRPORT TERMINALS C and D 37, 108, 115 =RQH Ê*Ë6WDWLRQV $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 $0 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDOV( ) TERMINAL A - EAST and WEST AIRPORT TERMINAL B 37, 108, 115 REGIONAL RAIL AIRPORT $LUSRUW7HUPLQDOV& ' D American Airlines International & Caribbean AIRPORT TERMINAL A EAST 37, 108, 115 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDO% British Airways AIRPORT TERMINAL A WEST 37, 108, 115 D $LUSRUW7HUPLQDO$ LINE EASTWICK (DVWZLFN Qatar Airways 37, 68, 108, 115 To/From Center City Philadelphia D 8511 Bartram Ave & D 3HQQ0HGLFLQH6WDWLRQ Eastern Airlines PENN MEDICINE STATION & DDWK6WUHHW6WDWLRQ ' TERMINAL B 3149 Convention Blvd 40, LUCY & DD6XEXUEDQ6WDWLRQ ' 215-580-6565 Effective September 5, 2021 & DD-HIIHUVRQ6WDWLRQ ' American Airlines Domestic & Canadian service MFL, 9, 10, 11, 13, 30, 31, 34, 36, 30th STREET STATION & D7HPSOH8QLYHUVLW\ The Philadelphia Marketplace 44, 49, 62, 78, 124, 125, LUCY, 30th & Market Sts Amtrak, NJT Atlantic City Rail Line • Airport Terminals E and F D :D\QH-XQFWLRQ ² ²² ²² ²² ² ² ² Airport Marriott Hotel SUBURBAN STATION MFL, BSL, 2, 4, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, DD)HUQ5RFN7& ² 27, 31, 32, 33, 34, 36, 38, 44, 48, 62, • Airport Terminals C and D 16th St
  • Subject: Request for Information (RFI) for SEPTA Key 2.0 SEPTA Is

    Subject: Request for Information (RFI) for SEPTA Key 2.0 SEPTA Is

    June 28,2021 To Whom It May Concern: Subject: Request for Information (RFI) for SEPTA Key 2.0 SEPTA is conducting an industry review to gain market insight with the goal of finalizing its Request for Proposal (“RFP”) solicitation documents. SEPTA is seeking an upgrade and or replacement for the existing operating system technology for the Key Program with the goal of assembling the procurement documents for this project. SEPTA is seeking input from experienced vendors. SEPTA requests that interested parties submit an RFI response document containing responses to the Authority’s questions no later than 3 pm. (Prevailing Eastern Time) Monday August 9, 2021. SEPTA does not intend to hold discussions at this time; however, SEPTA may contact interested parties to schedule individual meetings with SEPTA’s staff either at our headquarters in Philadelphia or virtually via video conference. When the review is completed and SEPTA has determined what systems are beneficial, SEPTA intends to solicit and then award a multi-year contract for SEPTA Key 2.0. SEPTA is seeking responses from entities with a proven operating fare collection system. Interested parties’ submissions will be in the form of responses to SEPTA’s questions regarding the features of the system. The questions and background information are provided in (Exhibit A), which is attached for your consideration. This is not a vendor selection process. If your organization is interested in this project, please contact me at the address shown below. Please send an "RFI" letter, to the attention of: James Coombs – Director, Contract Administration SEPTA’s Procurement, Supply Chain, & DBE Division 1234 Market Street, 11th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107-3780 E-Mail: [email protected] All questions pertaining to this RFI must be submitted in writing to James Coombs, via e-mail, no later than 3 pm (Prevailing Eastern Time) Friday July 16, 2021.
  • The Bulletin in MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J

    The Bulletin in MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J

    ERA BULLETIN — SEPTEMBER, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 9 September, 2020 The Bulletin IN MEMORIAM: WILLIAM J. MADDEN, 1947-2020 Published by the Electric Railroaders’ by Jeff Erlitz Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeff Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ron Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2020 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Public Service of New Jer- sey double-truck motor cars 2282 and 2235 on Main Avenue & Glendale Street in Nutley, New Jersey on February 11, 1936. Unknown photographer William J (Bill) Madden during a station stop on the Canadian at Thunder Bay, Ontario, July 24, 1977. Jeff Erlitz photograph With deep sadness, I must pass along the around 1970, initially on Saturday mornings In This Issue: news that William Madden passed away on and then on Monday evenings. Like most of Assorted Wednesday, August 12, at the age of 73 due us, he could be found collating, stamping Travels from to complications from COVID-19. envelopes, and bagging sacks of mail for Bill, as everyone knew him, joined the Elec- both the New York Division Bulletin and Na- the First Half of tric Railroaders’ Association on February 21, tional’s Headlights. When the ERA began 2020…Page 18 1964 and was member number 3062. He offering Life memberships, Bill was one of probably started volunteering at headquar- the few members who took up that offer.
  • Signature Redacted Thesis Supervisor Accepted By: As'sociate Pr Orf

    Signature Redacted Thesis Supervisor Accepted By: As'sociate Pr Orf

    I Unlocking SEPTA Key: An Analysis of the Decisions Leading to a New Fare Medium by Angel Jacome Bachelor of Arts Economics University of Pennsylvania, 2009 Master of Science in Education Long Island University, 2013 Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2017 @ 2017 Angel Jacome. All Rights Reserved The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of the thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. A redacted Author:_Signature Dgpa'rq ent of Urb Studies and Planning A d May 24, 2017 Signature redacted Certified by: Ezra Haber Glenn Lecturer, Deynrtment of Urban Studies and Planning Signature redacted Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: As'sociate Pr orf. Christopher Zegras Dep ent of Urban Studies and Planning MASSACHUSETTS INSTITU TE Chair, MCP Committee OF TECHNOLOGY JUN 14 2017 LIBRARIES ARCHIVES 2 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 3 Unlocking SEPTA Key: An Analysis of the Decisions Leading to a New Fare Medium by Angel Jacome Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 24th, 2017 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in City Planning ABSTRACT The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) is the sixth largest transit agency in the United States, serving 358 million passengers annually (APTA, 2015). Despite its size, SEPTA is the last major transportation agency to change their fare medium from tokens to contactless fare cards.