DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposed FY07 Budget

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Proposed FY07 Budget __________________________________________ Proposed FY07 Budget Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of Management and Budget One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY07 Budget Table of Contents The LA Story ........................................................................................................................ iii Budget Highlights..................................................................................................................1 Funding and Expense/Expenditure Summaries ..................................................................3 Enterprise Fund Summary of Revenues and Expenses .......................................................4 Service Levels .........................................................................................................................5 FY07 Bus Operating Statistics...............................................................................................6 Fare Revenue..........................................................................................................................8 Enterprise Fund ...................................................................................................................10 Activity Based Bus Cost Model............................................................................................12 Activity Based Light Rail Cost Model..................................................................................14 Activity Based Heavy Rail Cost Model ................................................................................15 Modal Operating Statistics ..................................................................................................16 Capital Program Project List ...............................................................................................18 Governmental Funds...........................................................................................................22 Special Revenue Funds........................................................................................................24 Regional Programs ..............................................................................................................26 Fund Balances......................................................................................................................28 Organization Chart ..............................................................................................................29 Summary of FY07 Budgeted FTEs by Department............................................................30 Summary Expenditures.......................................................................................................32 Debt Service Schedule .........................................................................................................34 Propositions A & C, and TDA Administration Expenditures and Funding......................36 Summary of Revenues and Carryover by Source ...............................................................38 Public Transportation Services Corporation.......................................................................40 Agency Funds ......................................................................................................................40 Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies.......................................................................44 Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority ..................................................................46 Proposed FY07 Budget Table of Contents • i Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY07 Budget This Page Intentionally Left Blank. ii • Table of Contents Proposed FY07 Budget Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY07 Budget The LA Story It’s an uplifting tale fit for the movies: idealistic transit agency tackles deeply ingrained car culture and triumphs through innovation, optimism and perseverance. Customer satisfaction is at an all-time high – The latest survey showed that 84% of customers were satisfied with Metro service, and 83% believed service has improved over the previous year. Complaints are at an all-time low – Metro’s complaints have never been lower. In terms of The hero of this tale is Metro – the Los both actual complaints per month and Angeles County Metropolitan complaints per 100,000 boardings, monthly Transportation Authority. Over the past complaint totals have dropped 25% this year. year, Metro stole the scene time and again with service innovations, technological Service productivity has outpaced service advances and customer - focused allocations – Metro increased revenue service initiatives. By the time the curtain came hours 1.4%, while passengers per hour grew down, we had one of the most productive 4.7%. This nearly 3-to-1 ratio made Metro the years in our history, and one of the most second most productive transit agency in the satisfied customer bases in the nation. United States. In short, Metro’s 2005 was a blockbuster, Metro aggressively added filled with moments worth remembering new services and honoring. Metro worked tirelessly to improve operations Ridership and revenues are up – Metro’s investment in new services and system improvements are paying major dividends. Ridership and farebox collections both increased. The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system grew rapidly – With more than 300 Metro Rapid buses and 30 Metroliners, Metro is at the halfway point in creating the most extensive BRT network in the country. Twenty-eight Rapid lines with 700+ vehicles will be in operation by 2008. Proposed FY07 Budget TThe LA StoryT • iii Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY07 Budget Metro added clean, bold, innovative, New Express services launched – The high-capacity vehicles agency pulled out all the stops on two new Metro Express lines – 450X and 577X. Using existing transitways, these routes are faster than driving alone. Metro offers the coolest, cleanest, most modern vehicles on the road – Sleek designs and vibrant colors highlight one of the most modern fleets on the road today. Color scheme features red for Rapid buses, blue for Metro Orange Line opens to 83,000 riders Express buses, and orange for Local buses. – “We begin a new era” Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa declared at the opening 2,000th Clean Air Bus delivered – celebration of the 14-mile busway. Since its Commemorating Earth Day, Metro reached a grand opening in October, the 18,000 daily milestone receiving its 2,000th CNG bus. boardings are 3-times the original projections. Metro boasts the largest clean-air fleet in the nation. Partnerships with local operators make system more seamless – Metro is fortunate Metro continues to order new buses – 200 to partner with local municipal operators to new high-capacity CNG vehicles were ordered expand Rapid lines, create new services and to replace older vehicles. These buses will be offer the regional EZ Transit Pass program. assigned to the busiest bus lines. The order Next on tap is TAP – a regional smart card includes 94 articulated buses – the 60-foot system. Metro Liners – and 100 45-foot buses and six 40-foot hybrid coaches. Metro attracted new customers Metro Blue Line reached record ridership – The 2nd most successful light rail line in the nation, the 22-mile Blue Line posted more than 76,000 average weekday boardings, the highest ridership since it opened in 1990. L.A.’s ridership doubles national averages – An APTA report confirmed Metro is doing relatively well in generating ridership. The New rail car airmailed to L.A. –The first of report showed that Metro bested the national 50 new 2550 light rail cars was flown to Los average by almost double. Angeles via a giant Russian-built cargo plane. These new rail cars were designed to operate Discretionary customers grew by 40% – on any Metro light rail line. They are Those hard-to-get “choice” riders now account scheduled to run on the Gold Line when it for three of every 10 riders, up from two of extends to East Los Angeles. every 10 just three years ago. iv • TThe LA StoryT Proposed FY07 Budget Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Proposed FY07 Budget Large capacity vehicles improved Prototype bus terminal opened – Metro productivity – Metro was able to carry more completed a new prototype bus terminal that people with fewer buses thanks to the new offers passenger and employee amenities. 46-seat NABI 45-foot “Compo-Bus” which is This facility is the model for future Metro bigger but significantly lighter than a customer facilities. conventional steel-framed bus. In addition Metro added new 60-foot articulated CNG buses to the fleet that seat 50 percent more passengers than a standard 40-foot bus. Metro advanced L.A.'s rapid transit system National panel gives subway tunneling the green light – Metro worked with federal officials to assemble an expert panel to revisit tunneling in Los Angeles. The panel endorsed safe tunneling under the heavily congested Wilshire corridor, paving the way to reverse a Gold Line extension under construction – decade-old federal ban on subway construction Metro initiated construction of the $989.9 in Los Angeles. million Metro Gold Line’s Eastside Extension. The six-mile line, which includes 1.8-mile twin tunnels, is slated to open in late 2009. Exposition Light Rail line to start construction – The newest extension of the 62-station Metro
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025)
    ten-year bus fleet management plan JUNE 2015 Ten-Year Bus Fleet Management Plan (FY 2016 – FY 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 TRANSIT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................... 6 1.1 TRANSIT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 6 1.2 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE TYPES ........................................................................................... 7 1.3 BUS SERVICE TYPE & LINE IDENTIFICATION......................................................................... 14 1.4 PROGRAMMED TRANSIT PROJECTS..................................................................................... 16 1.5 TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP)................................................................................................ 31 1.6 ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (ATMS)........................................ 31 2.0 VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 33 2.1 GENERAL FLEET STATISTICS ................................................................................................. 33 2.2 SPARE RATIO ........................................................................................................................ 35 2.3 CONTINGENCY FLEET ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Orange Line
    Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 Federal Transit Administration PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida CCOOVVEERR PPHHOTOOTO LLooss AAnnggeelleess CCoouunnttyy MMeettrrooppololiittanan TTransransppoorrttaattioionn AAuutthhoorriittyy DDIISCSCLLAAIIMMEERR TThhiis ds dooccuumemennt it is is inntteennddeed ad as a ts teecchhnniiccaal al assssiissttaanncce pe prroodduucctt. I. It it is dsiiss ssdeemmiinnaatteed udnn ddueer tr thhe sepp oosnnssoorrsshhiip opf tf tohhe Ue..SS U.. DDeeppaarrttmemennt ot of Tf Trraannssppoorrttaattiioon in in tn thhe ie inntteerreesst ot of if innffoorrmamattiioon enxxcc ehhaannggee. T. Thhe Uenn iittUeed Sdttaa Sttees Gsoo vvGeerrnnmemennt atss ssauumemes nso nlo liiaabbiilliittyy ffoor ir itts cs coonntteenntts os or ur usse te thheerreeooff. T. Thhe Ue Unniitteed Sd Sttaattees Gs Goovveerrnnmemennt dtoo eeds nsoo tn et ennddoorrsse perroo pdduucctts osf mfo aa nnmuuffaaccttuurreerrss. T. Trraadde oerr o mamannuuffaaccttuurreerrss’ n’ naamemes as appppeeaar her herreeiin sn soolleelly by beeccaauusse te thheey ayrre a ceoo nncssiiddeerreed edssss eeennttiiaal tl to tohh et oebb jjeeoccttiivve oef tf tohhiis rs reeppoorrtt.. Metro Orange Line BRT Project Evaluation OCTOBER 2011 FTA Report No. 0004 PREPARED BY Jennifer Flynn, Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Research Associate Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Joseph Samus, Graduate Research Assistant Caleb Van Nostrand, Graduate Research Assistant National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, CUT100 Tampa, FL 33620 SPONSORED BY Federal Transit Administration Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Access Pass (Tap) & Rail Fare Gate Status
    Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 213.922.9200 Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA 90012-2952 213.922.9201 Fax rnetro.net 41 REVISED OPERATIONS COMMITTEE APRIL 16,2009 SUBJECT: TRANSIT ACCESS PASS (TAP) & RAIL FARE GATE STATUS ACTION: RECEIVE AND FILE RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report on the Transit Access Pass (TAP) and Rail Fare Gate Status ISSUE TAP staff was directed to provide a regular status update of project milestones and deployment activities on the Transit Access Pass (TAP@)regional smart card. Also, with the inception of the Metro Rail Fare Gate project, staff was directed to report monthly on the progress of this project. This report serves to fulfd these requests. DISCUSSION There has been significant progress on TAP regional implementation: Municipal Operators - Culver CityBus and Santa Clarita Transit have successfully migrated their UFS systems with full TAP capabilities. Norwalk successfully installed UFS fareboxes with TAP capability on April 3. Foothill, Gardena, and Montebello are in the process of conversion between May and June, 2009. Reduced Fare TAP - Over 60,000 Senior, Disabled, and College/Vocational TAP cards have been produced and mailed to applicants. Day Pass - TAP cards, equipment, and supplies delivered to divisions for scheduled day pass conversion to TAP on March 15. At the point of writing this Board report, the conversion process has gone fairly uneventfully with the exception of card volumes requiring replenishment at bus divisions since customer education and training to re-cycle cards on subsequent usage needs further reinforcement. Metro Pass Sales Outlets - compact point of sales devices have been installed at over 400 pass sales outlets and additional devices are currently being installed at Cities and Senior Centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017
    Short Range Transportation Plan FY 2015 - 2017 City of Montebello Transportation Department City of Montebello – Transportation Department FY 2015 - 2017 SHORT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN Table of Contents SECTION 1 – OVERVIEW OF THE TRANSIT SYSTEM 1.1 History of the City of Montebello and Montebello Bus Lines ................................ 3 1.2 Governance and Organizational Structure ............................................................. 4 1.3 Transit Services and Areas Served .......................................................................... 5 1.4 Ridership ................................................................................................................. 7 1.5 Fare Structure ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Fleet, Facility and Equipment ................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 – BUDGET, FUNDING, AND REGULATION 2.1 Operating and Capital Budget............................................................................... 10 2.2 Funding Sources.................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Regulatory Requirements ..................................................................................... 11 SECTION 3 – ACCOMPLISHMENTS, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3.1 Past Accomplishments........................................................................................... 13 3.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals for Operation of Union
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR OPERATION OF UNION STATION, VAN NUYS, AND ORANGE LINE FLYAWAY BUS SERVICE Release Date: November 20, 2014 Pre-Proposal Conference: December 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time Los Angeles World Airports Administration West Building 7301 World Way West, Room 420 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Deadline for Submission of Questions/Requests for Clarification: Submit all questions and requests for clarification in writing to [email protected] no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time on December 10, 2014 Proposal Due Date: January 22, 2015 no later than 3 p.m. Pacific Time at: Commercial Development Attn: Christine Kalamaros 6053 W. Century Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90045 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 – GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................... 3 A. THE OPPORTUNITY .............................................................................. 3 SECTION 2 – BACKGROUND INFORMATION .......................................................... 4 A. LAWA ..................................................................................................... 4 B. DESCRIPTION OF LAX ......................................................................... 4 C. DESCRIPTION OF FLYAWAY FACILITIES ........................................... 4 D. FLEET .................................................................................................... 5 E. FARES ................................................................................................... 5 F. CURRENT SERVICE LEVELS ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Torrance Bus Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies
    TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES A Project Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master In Urban and Regional Planning By Jose M. Perez 2019 i SIGNATURE PAGE PROJECT: TORRANCE BUS SERVICE RELIABILITY AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES AUTHOR: Jose M. Perez DATE SUBMITTED: Spring 2019 Department of Urban and Regional Planning Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta Project Committee Chair Professor of Urban Planning Richard Zimmer Committee Member Lecturer of Urban Planning David Mach Senior Transportation Planner Torrance Transit i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks the Torrance Transit Employees for the data they furnished and their participation in the client project, especially Senior Transportation Planner David Mach. The author would also like to thank the City of Torrance for providing information on future development and specific goals of their circulation plan. Special thanks to Dr. Alvaro M. Huerta and Professor Richard Zimmer for their help and guidance in completing the client project. i ABSTRACT A city’s transportation infrastructure directly affects the mobility of the people, goods, and services, of all who live within its’ limits. Bus transit lines are a key element of a balanced transportation system that can improve or detract from the quality of life of its’ populous. Transit networks that are poorly implemented eventually become impractical and difficult to maintain; and thus, a burden upon the city it’s meant to help. In addition the service reliability of a transit line is critical to both the transit agency and its users in order to maintain a healthy transportation system.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bike Share Implementation Plan
    Regional Bike Share Implementation FOR LOS ANGELES Plan COUNTY PREPARED BY PREPARED FOR 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1050 Los Angeles, CA 90017 213.261.3050 April 22, 2015 [This page intentionally blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................ 6 Business Plan .............................................................................................. 8 Vision ............................................................................................................................ 9 System Overview ...................................................................................................13 Capital Ownership .................................................................................................14 Operations Model .................................................................................................14 Fare Structure..........................................................................................................14 TAP Integration ......................................................................................................19 Mobility Hubs Coordination .............................................................................23 Equity .........................................................................................................................25 Operations Funding..............................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Safety and Operations Committee J U L Y 2 6 , 2 0
    SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE JULY 26, 2013 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY ROSTER SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE COUNTY MEMBER San Bernardino: Paul Eaton (Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Montclair Larry McCallon Mayor, City of Highland Riverside: Karen Spiegel (Vice Chair) 1 vote Mayor, City of Corona Andrew Kotyuk Councilmember, City of San Jacinto Orange: Shawn Nelson 1 vote Supervisor, 4th District County of Orange Los Angeles: Richard Katz 1 vote Metro Appointee Don Knabe Supervisor, 4th District County of Los Angeles Robert T. Bartlett Metro Appointee Tom Lackey Mayor Pro Tem, City of Palmdale Ventura: Brian Humphrey 1 vote Commission Member VCTC One Gateway Plaza, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY SAFETY AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE FRIDAY, JULY 26, 2013 10:00 A.M. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY UNION STATION CONFERENCE ROOM ONE GATEWAY PLAZA, 3RD FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012 AGENDA DESCRIPTIONS The agenda descriptions are intended to give notice to members of the public and a brief general description of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the recommended actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Committee may take any action that it deems appropriate on the agenda item and is not limited in any way by the notice of the recommended action. The Chair reserves the right to discuss the items listed on the agenda in any order. A person with a disability may contact the Committee Secretary's office at (213) 452-0219 or via e-mail [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting to request receipt of an agenda in an alternative format or to request disability-related accommodations, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Agenda Report
    CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Date: January 17, 2017 TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Michael J. Egan, City Manager BY: James C. Parker, Director of Transportation Theresa Clark, Manager of Strategic Planning and Administrative Services SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT TRIENNIAL SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017-2019 Background: The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is required by Federal and State statutes to prepare a Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for Los Angeles County. The Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) facilitates input from each municipal transit agency, including Norwalk Transit System (NTS), on its planning and financial activities for inclusion into the Los Angeles County TIP. The SRTP/TIP serves as a formal record of both Metro and NTS’ commitment to transit services/projects and are mandatory components of the federal funding process. It is the responsibility of Metro to review each municipal transit operator’s SRTP to ensure that all Federal, State and Local reporting requirements are achieved; data collection efforts are coordinated and operator budgets are consistent with funding assumptions and regional planning policies. The SRTP is NTS’s primary planning document, and is updated on a triennial basis (financial tables must be submitted annually) according to guidelines issued by Metro. It describes the organizational structure in keeping with current and planned service changes over three years. Also, descriptions of the financial and capital improvements associated with major projects/programs are included as a reference for various internal and external stakeholders. Fiscal Impact: N/A Citizens Advised: N/A City Council January 17, 2017 Authorization to Submit Triennial Short Range Transit Plan Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Employer Annual Pass Program
    Metro Employer Annual Pass Program Metro offers Employer Annual Pass Programs that are a high-value benefit and help to improve employee morale, health and attendance. Employers and employees may qualify for Commuter Benefits, which will significantly reduce the cost of the employee pass and act as a business tax benefit for the employer. Metro Annual Transit Access Pass (ATAP) • Fare is pre-loaded annually and is good for the entire fiscal year Uuly-June) • Practically eliminates the administrative processing burden • Maximizes accessibility to transit for employees with EZ pass options • Provides peace of mind and control over passes • Includes a photo ID to help protect your investment • Employer Size (3 or more) Metro Employer Pass Program CE-Pass) • Ride everything that Metro owns and operates 2417, including Metro local buses, Metro Rapid buses and Metro rail • The employer can use E-Pass as a great way to recruit and retain talented employees and improve employee morale • Metro loves E-Pass because it introduces the non-rider to our system and increases ridership • Employer Size (50 or more) Metro Small Employer Pass Program (SEP) • Annual group rate for small to medium employers (249 or less) • Participation requirement is 50% of total employees (default minimum may apply) @ • Unlimited use on all Metro Bus, Metro Rail, Express and Silver Line • Includes a photo ID to help protect your investment • Helps reduce parking demand and expense To find out how you can partner with Metro and become an Employer Annual Pass Program client, please reguest more information (httQs://metrola.wufoo.com/forms/m1 cx0f9Q1 ixow34/) or call 213.922.7983 and a Metro annual transit pass expert will gladly assist you.
    [Show full text]
  • 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Outlook
    2053.3 For Action Update: 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Outlook Date: May 12, 2021 To: TTC Board From: Chief Strategy and Customer Officer Summary The purpose of this report to provide an update on the development of TTC’s 5-Year Fare Policy and 10-Year Fare Collection Strategy (Fare Policy and Collection Strategy). This report will outline the emerging insights from Phase 1 of the Fare Policy work stream and the proposed policy goals that will guide the development of a modernized fare collection system for the TTC and YRT. In addition, this report will provide the key learnings from stakeholder engagement, peer transit agency reviews and the TTC’s Automated Fare Collection Technology Request for Information (RFI), which closed on February 5, 2021. These key learnings from both the Fare Policy and Collection Strategy work streams will provide the basis for testing and modelling fare structures and viable fare collection options in the next phase of work. The potential fare policy and fare collection options will be presented to the Board in July 2021. Recommendations It is recommended that the TTC Board: 1. Endorse the proposed fare policy goals and objectives in Attachment 1 of this report to inform the development of fare options to be presented to the Board in July 2021; 2. Receive the results of the RFI and peer agency reviews in Attachments 2 and 3 of this report to inform the development of viable fare collection models to be presented to the Board in July 2021; and 3. Proceed with demonstrations from RFI respondents beginning with System Integrator vendors, to present their solutions to the TTC prior to the July Board meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Finance/Budget Department
    Adopted Budget July 1, 2015 – June 30, 2016 Table of Contents 1 BUILDING OUR MOBILITY 2 > Message from the CEO 4 > Board of Directors 6 > Organizational Chart 10 OVERVIEW 12 > Metro (LACMTA) 14 > Transit Expansion Timeline 16 > Improved Transit Service 18 > Delivering Transit & Highway Projects 22 > State of Good Repair 24 > Sustainability 26 > Congestion Management 27 > Budget Summary 28 BUDGET DETAILS 30 > Resources 32 > Expenditures 34 > Enterprise Fund 36 > Capital Program 38 > Regional Subsidy Funding Programs 40 > Congestion Management 42 > Debt 44 > Fund Balances & Governmental Fund Financial Statements 46 > Measure R 48 > Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) 52 APPENDICES 54 > Appendix I: Service Statistics 56 > Appendix II: Activity Based Bus Cost Model 58 > Appendix III: Activity Based Rail Cost Model 60 > Appendix IV: Capital Program Project Listing 62 > Appendix V: Regional Transit Allocations 70 > Appendix VI: Subsidies to Local Agencies 72 > Appendix VII: Legally Separate Entities 74 > Appendix VIII: Los Angeles County Subregions & Supervisory Districts 76 ABBREVIATIONS 78 Building our Mobility 4 Message from the CEO With the benefit of visionary and generous voters, our county has strong local support for transportation, including the most recent sales tax, Measure R, which passed in 2008 at the beginning of the Great Recession. This measure and past voter support makes possible the construction we see today, and keeps Metro fares among the lowest of any major transit system in the U.S. But we’re not going it alone. Last year, we secured more than $3 billion in federal support, including approximately $2 billion in federal New Starts money and more than $1 billion in low- interest TIFIA loans for Phase 1 of the Westside Purple Line Subway and the Regional Connector.
    [Show full text]