Bazinet Umd 0117E 16489.Pdf (9.061Mb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bazinet Umd 0117E 16489.Pdf (9.061Mb) ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: COMPUTATIONAL METHODS TO ADVANCE PHYLOGENOMIC WORKFLOWS Adam Bazinet, Doctor of Philosophy, 2015 Dissertation directed by: Professor Michael Cummings Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Affiliate Professor, Department of Computer Science Phylogenomics refers to the use of genome-scale data in phylogenetic analysis. There are several methods for acquiring genome-scale, phylogenetically-useful data from an organism that avoid sequencing the entire genome, thus reducing cost and effort, and enabling one to sequence many more individuals. In this dissertation we focus on one method in particular | rna sequencing | and the concomitant use of assembled protein-coding transcripts in phylogeny reconstruction. Phylogenomic workflows involve tasks that are algorithmically and computationally demanding, in part due to the large amount of sequence data typically included in such analyses. This dissertation applies techniques from computer science to improve methodology and performance associated with phylogenomic workflow tasks such as sequence clas- sification, transcript assembly, orthology determination, and phylogenetic analysis. While the majority of the methods developed in this dissertation can be applied to the analysis of diverse organismal groups, we primarily focus on the analysis of transcriptome data from Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), generated as part of a collaboration known as \Leptree". COMPUTATIONAL METHODS TO ADVANCE PHYLOGENOMIC WORKFLOWS by Adam Bazinet Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Advisory Committee: Professor Michael Cummings, Chair/Advisor Professor Charles Mitter, Dean's Representative Professor Mihai Pop Professor H´ectorCorrada Bravo Professor Amitabh Varshney c Copyright by Adam Bazinet 2015 Preface This dissertation is based, in part, on the following publications, listed by chapter: Chapter 2 Adam L. Bazinet and Michael P. Cummings. A comparative evaluation of se- quence classification programs. BMC Bioinformatics, 13:92, 2012. Chapter 3 Adam L. Bazinet, Michael P. Cummings, and Antonis Rokas. Homologous gene consensus avoids orthology-paralogy misspecification in phylogenetic inference. Un- published. Chapter 4 Adam L. Bazinet, Derrick J. Zwickl, and Michael P. Cummings. A gateway for phylogenetic analysis powered by grid computing featuring GARLI 2.0. Systematic Biology, 63(5):812-818, 2014. Chapter 5 Adam L. Bazinet and Michael P. Cummings. Computing the tree of life: lever- aging the power of desktop and service grids. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Desktop Grids and Volunteer Computing Systems (PCGrid), 2011. ii Chapter 6 Adam L. Bazinet and Michael P. Cummings. Subdividing long-running, variable- length analyses into short, fixed-length BOINC workunits. Journal of Grid Com- puting. Submitted. Chapter 7 Adam L. Bazinet, Michael P. Cummings, Kim T. Mitter, and Charles W. Mit- ter. Can RNA-Seq resolve the rapid radiation of advanced moths and butter- flies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera: Apoditrysia)? An exploratory study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e82615, 2013. Chapter 8 Adam L. Bazinet, Michael P. Cummings, Kim T. Mitter, and Charles W. Mit- ter. Can RNA-Seq resolve the rapid radiation of advanced moths and butterflies (Hexapoda: Lepidoptera: Apoditrysia)? A follow-up study. In preparation. iii Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my wife Jennifer, and my two children Cassandra and Derek. A loving family makes every day worth living. iv Acknowledgements I am grateful to many, many people for making this dissertation work possible. First, I would like to give wholehearted thanks to my advisor, Dr. Michael Cummings. For well over a decade, I have been privileged to be a member of the Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, which Dr. Cummings leads and directs. My experience in his research group has been truly rewarding, and I am exceedingly grateful to be able to work with and learn from Dr. Cummings on a daily basis. He is a tireless, dedicated scientist and a devoted mentor. I would like to recognize Drs. Charles and Kim Mitter, who have been ex- tremely pleasant colleagues to work with on lepidopteran systematics over the past several years. Thanks also to the rest of my committee members for their support and encouragement. Thanks to the faculty members in computer science at the University of Mary- land | particularly those affiliated with the Center for Bioinformatics and Compu- tational Biology | for the many years of instruction that I have had the privilege to receive. To the many colleagues, coworkers, collaborators, system administrators, and support staff with whom I have had the pleasure of working these many years, thank you for your dedication and cooperation. Finally, I would like to thank my family for their love and unwavering support. The acknowledgements that follow are specific to various chapters. v Chapter 2 We acknowledge all of the tool developers for making their programs, data sets, and documentation available. In particular, we thank the following au- thors for their assistance acquiring data sets, running various programs, or making sense of results: Bo Liu (MetaPhyler), Manuel Stark (mltreemap), Kaustubh Patil (PhyloPythiaS), Arthur Brady and Steven Salzberg (phymmbl), and Ozkan Nal- bantoglu (raiphy). In addition, we thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Chapter 4 We thank Barry Dutton, Yevgeny Deviatov, Derrick Hinkle, and Kevin Young for their efforts developing various aspects of the grid system and the garli web service; Charles Mitter for developing the statistical determination of the num- ber of required garli search replicates; and Mike Landavere, Christopher Camacho, Ahmed El-Haggan, Taha Mohammed, Patrick Beach, Matthew Kweskin, Kevin Hildebrand, and Fritz McCall (and other umiacs staff members) for connecting and administering grid system resources. We also thank the associate editor and one anonymous reviewer for their helpful suggestions. Funding for this work was provided by National Science Foundation award number DBI-0755048. Chapter 5 U.S. National Science Foundation award DBI-0755048 provided funding for this project. Chapter 6 We thank Derrick Zwickl for adding necessary features to garli that enabled this work. Similarly, we thank David Anderson for adding new features to boinc that aided with testing. This work was funded by National Science Founda- vi tion award DBI-1356562. Chapter 7 We are greatly indebted to the following generous colleagues for pro- viding specimens used in this study: Andreas Zwick, Marcus J. Matthews, Akito Y. Kawahara, Robert F. Denno, Bernard Landry, Timothy Friedlander, Daniel H. Janzen, Andrew Mitchell, Joaquin Baixeras, Ron Robertson, Jadranka Rota, David Adamski, Jaga Giebultowicz, Chris Bergh, Neil R. Spencer, James K. Adams, and Luis Pea. Our work was greatly facilitated by the expert help of Suwei Zhao of the University of Maryland-Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Se- quencing Core. We thank the Editor as well as Niklas Wahlberg and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. This study was made possible by the foundation built by our esteemed colleague Jerome Regier, who has now transitioned to a new scholarly career. vii Table of Contents List of Tables xiii List of Figures xiv List of Abbreviations xvii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background on phylogenetics . .1 1.2 \Genes to trees": an overview of phylogenetic workflows . .2 1.2.1 A traditional phylogenetic workflow . .2 1.2.2 The Leptree collaboration . .2 1.2.3 Phylogenomics: whole-genome-inspired methodology . .3 1.3 Computational methods in phylogenomic workflows . .5 1.3.1 Transcriptome assembly . .7 1.3.2 Orthology determination . .7 1.3.3 Multiple sequence alignment . .8 1.3.4 Phylogenetic analysis . .9 1.4 Applying high-throughput computing to phylogenetic analysis . 10 1.4.1 The Lattice Project: a multi-model grid computing system . 11 1.5 Dissertation outline . 12 2 An evaluation of sequence classification programs 13 2.1 Background . 13 2.1.1 General approaches to sequence classification . 15 2.1.1.1 Additional considerations . 18 2.1.2 Program capability analysis . 19 2.1.3 Program performance evaluation . 19 2.2 Results . 23 2.2.1 Alignment . 23 2.2.1.1 FACS 269 bp high complexity 454 metagenomic data set............................ 25 2.2.1.2 MetaPhyler 300 bp simulated metagenomic data set 25 viii 2.2.1.3 CARMA 265 bp simulated 454 metagenomic data set 26 2.2.1.4 PhyloPythia 961 bp simMC data set . 28 2.2.1.5 Discussion . 28 2.2.2 Composition . 30 2.2.2.1 PhyloPythia 961 bp simMC data set . 31 2.2.2.2 PhymmBL 243 bp RefSeq data set . 31 2.2.2.3 RAIphy 238 bp RefSeq data set . 32 2.2.2.4 Discussion . 32 2.2.3 Phylogenetics . 33 2.2.3.1 PhyloPythia 961 bp simMC data set . 34 2.2.3.2 Discussion . 34 2.2.4 Comparison of all programs . 35 2.3 Conclusions . 35 2.4 Methods . 37 2.4.1 Program classification . 37 2.4.2 Tool usage and result processing . 38 2.5 Use of sequence classification programs in phylogenomics . 39 3 Use of consensus sequences as an alternative to orthology determination 45 3.1 Background on orthology . 45 3.2 Consensus sequences: an alternative to orthology determination . 49 3.3 Validation of the consensus method . 50 3.3.1 Yeast transcriptome analysis . 50 3.3.2 Vertebrate proteome analysis . 55 3.3.3 Plant proteome analysis . 57 3.4 Summary . 58 4 The GARLI web service 62 4.1 Introduction . 62 4.2 The Lattice Project compared to other scientific gateways . 65 4.3 GARLI web service: user interface and functionality . 68 4.3.1 Modes of use . 68 4.3.2 Create job page . 69 4.3.3 Job status page . 69 4.3.4 Job details page . 70 4.4 Partitioned analysis specification . 70 4.5 Post-processing routines . 71 4.5.1 Calculating the required number of GARLI search replicates .
Recommended publications
  • Fatty Acid-Amino Acid Conjugates Diversification in Lepidopteran Caterpillars
    J Chem Ecol (2010) 36:319–325 DOI 10.1007/s10886-010-9764-8 Fatty Acid-amino Acid Conjugates Diversification in Lepidopteran Caterpillars Naoko Yoshinaga & Hans T. Alborn & Tomoaki Nakanishi & David M. Suckling & Ritsuo Nishida & James H. Tumlinson & Naoki Mori Received: 30 September 2009 /Revised: 29 January 2010 /Accepted: 11 February 2010 /Published online: 27 February 2010 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract Fatty acid amino acid conjugates (FACs) have the presence of FACs in lepidopteran species outside these been found in noctuid as well as sphingid caterpillar oral families of agricultural interest is not well known. We con- secretions; in particular, volicitin [N-(17-hydroxylinolenoyl)- ducted FAC screening of 29 lepidopteran species, and found L-glutamine] and its biochemical precursor, N-linolenoyl-L- them in 19 of these species. Thus, FACs are commonly glutamine, are known elicitors of induced volatile emissions synthesized through a broad range of lepidopteran cater- in corn plants. These induced volatiles, in turn, attract natural pillars. Since all FAC-containing species had N-linolenoyl-L- enemies of the caterpillars. In a previous study, we showed glutamine and/or N-linoleoyl-L-glutamine in common, and that N-linolenoyl-L-glutamine in larval Spodoptera litura the evolutionarily earliest species among them had only plays an important role in nitrogen assimilation which might these two FACs, these glutamine conjugates might be the be an explanation for caterpillars synthesizing FACs despite evolutionarily older FACs. Furthermore, some species had an increased risk of attracting natural enemies. However, glutamic acid conjugates, and some had hydroxylated FACs. Comparing the diversity of FACs with lepidopteran phylog- eny indicates that glutamic acid conjugates can be synthe- N.
    [Show full text]
  • SYSTEMATICS of the MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of T
    SYSTEMATICS OF THE MEGADIVERSE SUPERFAMILY GELECHIOIDEA (INSECTA: LEPIDOPTEA) DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sibyl Rae Bucheli, M.S. ***** The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Dr. John W. Wenzel, Advisor Dr. Daniel Herms Dr. Hans Klompen _________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Passoa Advisor Graduate Program in Entomology ABSTRACT The phylogenetics, systematics, taxonomy, and biology of Gelechioidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera) are investigated. This superfamily is probably the second largest in all of Lepidoptera, and it remains one of the least well known. Taxonomy of Gelechioidea has been unstable historically, and definitions vary at the family and subfamily levels. In Chapters Two and Three, I review the taxonomy of Gelechioidea and characters that have been important, with attention to what characters or terms were used by different authors. I revise the coding of characters that are already in the literature, and provide new data as well. Chapter Four provides the first phylogenetic analysis of Gelechioidea to include molecular data. I combine novel DNA sequence data from Cytochrome oxidase I and II with morphological matrices for exemplar species. The results challenge current concepts of Gelechioidea, suggesting that traditional morphological characters that have united taxa may not be homologous structures and are in need of further investigation. Resolution of this problem will require more detailed analysis and more thorough characterization of certain lineages. To begin this task, I conduct in Chapter Five an in- depth study of morphological evolution, host-plant selection, and geographical distribution of a medium-sized genus Depressaria Haworth (Depressariinae), larvae of ii which generally feed on plants in the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Micro-Moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Abhnumber Code
    Micro-moth Grading Guidelines (Scotland) Scottish Adult Mine Case ABHNumber Code Species Vernacular List Grade Grade Grade Comment 1.001 1 Micropterix tunbergella 1 1.002 2 Micropterix mansuetella Yes 1 1.003 3 Micropterix aureatella Yes 1 1.004 4 Micropterix aruncella Yes 2 1.005 5 Micropterix calthella Yes 2 2.001 6 Dyseriocrania subpurpurella Yes 2 A Confusion with fly mines 2.002 7 Paracrania chrysolepidella 3 A 2.003 8 Eriocrania unimaculella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.004 9 Eriocrania sparrmannella Yes 2 A 2.005 10 Eriocrania salopiella Yes 2 R Easier if larva present 2.006 11 Eriocrania cicatricella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.007 13 Eriocrania semipurpurella Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 2.008 12 Eriocrania sangii Yes 4 R Easier if larva present 4.001 118 Enteucha acetosae 0 A 4.002 116 Stigmella lapponica 0 L 4.003 117 Stigmella confusella 0 L 4.004 90 Stigmella tiliae 0 A 4.005 110 Stigmella betulicola 0 L 4.006 113 Stigmella sakhalinella 0 L 4.007 112 Stigmella luteella 0 L 4.008 114 Stigmella glutinosae 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.009 115 Stigmella alnetella 0 L Examination of larva essential 4.010 111 Stigmella microtheriella Yes 0 L 4.011 109 Stigmella prunetorum 0 L 4.012 102 Stigmella aceris 0 A 4.013 97 Stigmella malella Apple Pigmy 0 L 4.014 98 Stigmella catharticella 0 A 4.015 92 Stigmella anomalella Rose Leaf Miner 0 L 4.016 94 Stigmella spinosissimae 0 R 4.017 93 Stigmella centifoliella 0 R 4.018 80 Stigmella ulmivora 0 L Exit-hole must be shown or larval colour 4.019 95 Stigmella viscerella
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Parasites on Fitness Parameters of the European Hedgehog (Erinaceus Europaeus)
    Influence of parasites on fitness parameters of the European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus ) Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines DOKTORS DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (Dr. rer. nat.) Fakultät für Chemie und Biowissenschaften Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) – Universitätsbereich vorgelegte DISSERTATION von Miriam Pamina Pfäffle aus Heilbronn Dekan: Prof. Dr. Stefan Bräse Referent: Prof. Dr. Horst Taraschewski Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Agustin Estrada-Peña Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 19.10.2010 For my mother and my sister – the strongest influences in my life “Nose-to-nose with a hedgehog, you get a chance to look into its eyes and glimpse a spark of truly wildlife.” (H UGH WARWICK , 2008) „Madame Michel besitzt die Eleganz des Igels: außen mit Stacheln gepanzert, eine echte Festung, aber ich ahne vage, dass sie innen auf genauso einfache Art raffiniert ist wie die Igel, diese kleinen Tiere, die nur scheinbar träge, entschieden ungesellig und schrecklich elegant sind.“ (M URIEL BARBERY , 2008) Index of contents Index of contents ABSTRACT 13 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG 15 I. INTRODUCTION 17 1. Parasitism 17 2. The European hedgehog ( Erinaceus europaeus LINNAEUS 1758) 19 2.1 Taxonomy and distribution 19 2.2 Ecology 22 2.3 Hedgehog populations 25 2.4 Parasites of the hedgehog 27 2.4.1 Ectoparasites 27 2.4.2 Endoparasites 32 3. Study aims 39 II. MATERIALS , ANIMALS AND METHODS 41 1. The experimental hedgehog population 41 1.1 Hedgehogs 41 1.2 Ticks 43 1.3 Blood sampling 43 1.4 Blood parameters 45 1.5 Regeneration 47 1.6 Climate parameters 47 2. Hedgehog dissections 48 2.1 Hedgehog samples 48 2.2 Biometrical data 48 2.3 Organs 49 2.4 Parasites 50 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Razowski X.Vp:Corelventura
    Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275, Kraków, 30 Sep., 2003 Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) Józef RAZOWSKI Received: 15 March, 2003 Accepted for publication: 20 May, 2003 RAZOWSKI J. 2003. Reassessment of forewing pattern elements in Tortricidae (Lepidop- tera). Acta zoologica cracoviensia, 46(3): 269-275. Abstract. Forewing pattern elements of moths in the family Tortricidae are discussed and characterized. An historical review of the terminology is provided. A new system of nam- ing pattern elements is proposed. Key words. Lepidoptera, Tortricidae, forewing pattern, analysis, terminology. Józef RAZOWSKI, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, S³awkowska 17, 31-016 Kraków, Poland. E-mail: razowski.isez.pan.krakow.pl I. INTRODUCTION Early tortricid workers such as HAWORTH (1811), HERRICH-SCHHÄFFER (1856), and others pre- sented the first terminology for forewing pattern elements in their descriptions of new species. Nearly a century later, SÜFFERT (1929) provided a more eclectic discussion of pattern elements for Lepidoptera in general. In recent decades, the common and repeated use of specific terms in de- scriptions and illustrations by FALKOVITSH (1966), DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968), and oth- ers reinforced these terms in Tortricidae. BRADLEY et al. (1973) summarized and commented on all the English terms used to describe forewing pattern elements. DANILEVSKY and KUZNETZOV (1968) and KUZNETZOV (1978) analyzed tortricid pattern elements, primarily Olethreutinae, dem- onstrating the taxonomic significance of the costal strigulae in that subfamily. For practical pur- poses they numbered the strigulae from the forewing apex to the base, where the strigulae often become indistinct. KUZNETZOV (1978) named the following forewing elements in Tortricinae: ba- sal fascia, subterminal fascia, outer fascia (comprised of subapical blotch and outer blotch), apical spot, and marginal line situated in the marginal fascia (a component of the ground colour).
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Word 1 Microsoft Word
    Microsoft Word 1 Microsoft Word Microsoft Office Word 2007 in Windows Vista Developer(s) Microsoft Stable release 12.0.6425.1000 (2007 SP2) / April 28, 2009 Operating system Microsoft Windows Type Word processor License Proprietary EULA [1] Website Microsoft Word Windows Microsoft Word 2008 in Mac OS X 10.5. Developer(s) Microsoft Stable release 12.2.1 Build 090605 (2008) / August 6, 2009 Operating system Mac OS X Type Word processor License Proprietary EULA [2] Website Microsoft Word Mac Microsoft Word is Microsoft's word processing software. It was first released in 1983 under the name Multi-Tool Word for Xenix systems.[3] [4] [5] Versions were later written for several other platforms including IBM PCs running DOS (1983), the Apple Macintosh (1984), SCO UNIX, OS/2 and Microsoft Windows (1989). It is a component of the Microsoft Office system; however, it is also sold as a standalone product and included in Microsoft Microsoft Word 2 Works Suite. Beginning with the 2003 version, the branding was revised to emphasize Word's identity as a component within the Office suite; Microsoft began calling it Microsoft Office Word instead of merely Microsoft Word. The latest releases are Word 2007 for Windows and Word 2008 for Mac OS X, while Word 2007 can also be run emulated on Linux[6] . There are commercially available add-ins that expand the functionality of Microsoft Word. History Word 1981 to 1989 Concepts and ideas of Word were brought from Bravo, the original GUI writing word processor developed at Xerox PARC.[7] [8] On February 1, 1983, development on what was originally named Multi-Tool Word began.
    [Show full text]
  • The Microlepidopterous Fauna of Sri Lanka, Formerly Ceylon, Is Famous
    ON A COLLECTION OF SOME FAMILIES OF MICRO- LEPIDOPTERA FROM SRI LANKA (CEYLON) by A. DIAKONOFF Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden With 65 text-figures and 18 plates CONTENTS Preface 3 Cochylidae 5 Tortricidae, Olethreutinae, Grapholitini 8 „ „ Eucosmini 23 „ „ Olethreutini 66 „ Chlidanotinae, Chlidanotini 78 „ „ Polyorthini 79 „ „ Hilarographini 81 „ „ Phricanthini 81 „ Tortricinae, Tortricini 83 „ „ Archipini 95 Brachodidae 98 Choreutidae 102 Carposinidae 103 Glyphipterigidae 108 A list of identified species no A list of collecting localities 114 Index of insect names 117 Index of latin plant names 122 PREFACE The microlepidopterous fauna of Sri Lanka, formerly Ceylon, is famous for its richness and variety, due, without doubt, to the diversified biotopes and landscapes of this beautiful island. In spite of this, there does not exist a survey of its fauna — except a single contribution, by Lord Walsingham, in Moore's "Lepidoptera of Ceylon", already almost a hundred years old, and a number of small papers and stray descriptions of new species, in various journals. The authors of these papers were Walker, Zeller, Lord Walsingham and a few other classics — until, starting with 1905, a flood of new descriptions 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN I93 (1982) and records from India and Ceylon appeared, all by the hand of Edward Meyrick. He was almost the single specialist of these faunas, until his death in 1938. To this great Lepidopterist we chiefly owe our knowledge of all groups of Microlepidoptera of Sri Lanka. After his death this information stopped abruptly. In the later years great changes have taken place in the tropical countries. We are now facing, alas, the disastrously quick destruction of natural bio- topes, especially by the reckless liquidation of the tropical forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Sci. Roman Viktorovich Yakovlev Date Of
    Dr. Sci. Roman Viktorovich Yakovlev Date of birth: November 30, 1974 Key words: fauna, entomology, systematics, Altai, Mongolia, Lepidoptera, Cossidae, Papilionoidea. Short biography Born in the city of Barnaul in the family of doctors. Graduated from school with a silver medal. 1996 - graduated from Altai State Medical Institute with the qualification "doctor". Worked as a child psychiatrist in the Altai Regional Psychoneurological Clinic. At the same time worked as a research associate in the South-Siberian Botanical Garden of Altai State University. Since 2014 - Doctor of Biological Sciences (specialty "Entomology", the theme of the dissertation: "Carpenter-Moths (Lepidoptera, Cossidae) of the Old World”); place of defense: Saint-Petersburg State University. 2008−2012 — Head of the Department at the Altai Regional Institute of Advanced Teachers Training. 2013−2014 − the vice-rector for the development of international activities of Altai State University. At present – senior researcher of Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology and assistant professor of the Department of Ecology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology at the Altai State University. Scientific specialization: systematics, faunistics and biogeography. Specialist in the following groups of Insecta: Papilionoidea, Sphingidae, Cossidae. Author of over 170 scientific papers (more than 30 of them indexed in Web of Science and Scopus. Described over 250 biological species as new for science. The first to have described the fauna of Cossidae of the following regions of the Earth: Russia, Vietnam, Mongolia, the Andaman Islands, the Korean Peninsula, Thailand, the Canary Islands, the island of Socotra, Zambia, Zimbabave, Malawi. Author of essays in the Red Book of the Altai Territory, the Altai Republic and the Republic of Khakassia.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Productivity and Efficiency of Maize Production in Gardega-Jarte District of Ethiopia
    World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 15 (3): 180-193, 2019 ISSN 1817-3047 © IDOSI Publications, 2019 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wjas.2019.180.193 Analysis of Productivity and Efficiency of Maize Production in Gardega-Jarte District of Ethiopia 12Hika Wana and Afsaw Lemessa 1Wollega University, Department of Agricultural Economics, P.O. Box, 395, Nekempt, Ethiopia 2Gardega-Jarte, Agricultural Office, P.O. Box, Shambu, Ethiopia Abstract: The aim of the study was to estimate technical efficiency of smallholder farmers in maize production in case of Jardega Jarte districts with specific objectives to estimate the level of technical efficiency and to identify factors affecting technical efficiency in the study area. The study used cross-sectional data and the data were collected from sample representative respondents of 168 randomly selected farm households. Cobb-Douglas production function and the Stochastic Frontier Model were used to identify factors influencing productivity and efficiency. The hypotheses tests confirm that, the adequacy of Cobb-Douglas the appropriateness of using SFA the joint statistical significance of inefficiency effects; the appropriateness of using Half- normal and Exponential distribution for one sided error; and nature of the stochastic production function. The maximum likelihood parameter estimates showed that all input variables have positive and significant effect on production. The estimated Cob Douglas production function revealed that all inputs labor in hour, maize cultivated land, Dap, Urea, Seed, oxen have positive
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Mitogenomic Phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 79 (2014) 169–178 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Towards a mitogenomic phylogeny of Lepidoptera ⇑ Martijn J.T.N. Timmermans a,b, , David C. Lees c, Thomas J. Simonsen a a Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom b Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom c Department of Zoology, Cambridge University, Downing Street CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: The backbone phylogeny of Lepidoptera remains unresolved, despite strenuous recent morphological and Received 13 January 2014 molecular efforts. Molecular studies have focused on nuclear protein coding genes, sometimes adding a Revised 11 May 2014 single mitochondrial gene. Recent advances in sequencing technology have, however, made acquisition of Accepted 26 May 2014 entire mitochondrial genomes both practical and economically viable. Prior phylogenetic studies utilised Available online 6 June 2014 just eight of 43 currently recognised lepidopteran superfamilies. Here, we add 23 full and six partial mitochondrial genomes (comprising 22 superfamilies of which 16 are newly represented) to those Keywords: publically available for a total of 24 superfamilies and ask whether such a sample can resolve deeper tRNA rearrangement lepidopteran phylogeny. Using recoded datasets we obtain topologies that are highly congruent with Ditrysia Illumina prior nuclear and/or morphological studies. Our study shows support for an expanded Obtectomera LR-PCR including Gelechioidea, Thyridoidea, plume moths (Alucitoidea and Pterophoroidea; possibly along with Pooled mitochondrial genome assembly Epermenioidea), Papilionoidea, Pyraloidea, Mimallonoidea and Macroheterocera.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometro
    Contributions Toward a Lepidoptera (Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, Thyrididae, Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, & Noctuoidea) Biodiversity Inventory of the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab Hugo L. Kons Jr. Last Update: June 2001 Abstract A systematic check list of 489 species of Lepidoptera collected in the University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Lab is presented, including 464 species in the superfamilies Drepanoidea, Geometroidea, Mimalonoidea, Bombycoidea, Sphingoidea, and Noctuoidea. Taxa recorded in Psychidae, Yponomeutidae, Sesiidae, Cossidae, Zygaenoidea, and Thyrididae are also included. Moth taxa were collected at ultraviolet lights, bait, introduced Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and by netting specimens. A list of taxa recorded feeding on P. notatum is presented. Introduction The University of Florida Natural Area Teaching Laboratory (NATL) contains 40 acres of natural habitats maintained for scientific research, conservation, and teaching purposes. Habitat types present include hammock, upland pine, disturbed open field, cat tail marsh, and shallow pond. An active management plan has been developed for this area, including prescribed burning to restore the upland pine community and establishment of plots to study succession (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/natl.htm). The site is a popular collecting locality for student and scientific collections. The author has done extensive collecting and field work at NATL, and two previous reports have resulted from this work, including: a biodiversity inventory of the butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea & Papilionoidea) of NATL (Kons 1999), and an ecological study of Hermeuptychia hermes (F.) and Megisto cymela (Cram.) in NATL habitats (Kons 1998). Other workers have posted NATL check lists for Ichneumonidae, Sphecidae, Tettigoniidae, and Gryllidae (http://csssrvr.entnem.ufl.edu/~walker/insect.htm).
    [Show full text]