Design and Manufacture of an Adaptive Suspension System a Major Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Design and Manufacture of an Adaptive Suspension System A Major Qualifying Project Report submitted to the faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE This report represents the work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its website without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, please see http://www.wpi.edu/academics/ugradstudies/project-learning.html In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor Science By Michael Gifford, Mechanical Engineering Tanner Landis, Mechanical Engineering Cody Wood, Mechanical Engineering Date April 30, 2015 Professor Cagdas Onal, Advisor Siamak Ghorbani-Faal, Co-Advisor Abstract This project focuses on the design, development, evaluation, and analysis of an adjustable vehicle suspension system. This system is aimed to improve vehicle performance on all terrain conditions from rough to flat surfaces. The proposed design is accomplished through the modification of a double-triangulated four-bar linkage suspension. The modifications allow the upper links of the suspension system to change vertical position on-the-fly, to meet operator preference. The position change alters suspension geometry and therefore the performance characteristics of the vehicle; specifically the anti-squat which impacts vehicle sag and therefore traction. Thus, traction is directly controlled through adjustments to the suspension system. Through video motion analysis of a prototype vehicle before and after the proposed design modifications, we rigorously evaluated the effect of the adjustable suspension system. Future applications of this design are expected to improve the performance characteristics of vehicles of all sizes, ranging from mobile robots to automobiles. In addition to scalability, the advantage of our design is the on-the-fly adaptability, which enables adjustments in suspension performance for the terrain or obstacle being traversed. Authorship This report was a combined effort between all members of our MQP team. Each member evenly contributed to this project and report. 2 | P a g e Acknowledgements Our project team would like to thank all of the following people whose contributions played an important role in the completion of our project: Advisor: Cagdas Onal Co-advisor: Siamak Ghorbani-Faal Thank you to everyone else who helped us throughout this project including the WPI Library Staff, the Rapid Prototyping Team and Ming Luo 3 | P a g e Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Authorship....................................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.0 Background ............................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Springs ................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1.1 Leaf Springs .................................................................................................................. 11 2.1.2 Coil Springs .................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.3 Air Springs .................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.4 Torsion Bars ................................................................................................................. 16 2.1.5 Rubber Springs ............................................................................................................. 17 2.1.6 Spring Causes and Effects ............................................................................................ 18 2.2 Shock Dampers ................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Hydraulic Pressure ........................................................................................................ 19 2.2.2 Gas Pressure ................................................................................................................. 19 2.2.3 Air Pressure .................................................................................................................. 20 2.3 Definitions and Scientific Rationale ................................................................................... 21 2.3.1 Anti-squat ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.3.2 Roll-axis........................................................................................................................ 21 2.3.3 Anti-roll bars................................................................................................................. 23 2.3.4 Pinion Angle ................................................................................................................. 25 2.3.5 Center of Gravity .......................................................................................................... 26 2.4 Suspension Systems ............................................................................................................ 27 2.5 Linkage Suspension Systems .............................................................................................. 27 2.5.1 Four Bar Linkage Suspensions ..................................................................................... 27 2.5.2 Current styles of Four Bars ........................................................................................... 28 2.5.3 Advantages vs. Disadvantages ..................................................................................... 30 2.6 Actuators ............................................................................................................................. 31 2.6.1 Hydraulic Actuators ...................................................................................................... 31 4 | P a g e 2.6.2 Pneumatic Actuators ..................................................................................................... 31 2.6.3 Rotational Servomechanisms ....................................................................................... 31 2.7 Specifications for Road Legal Vehicles .............................................................................. 32 2.8 User Interface ...................................................................................................................... 32 2.9 Project Foundation .............................................................................................................. 33 2.9.1 Lab Scale Prototype ...................................................................................................... 33 2.9.2 The Jeep Forward Control ............................................................................................ 33 3.0 Goal Statement ........................................................................................................................ 35 4.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Determination of 4-Bar Linkage Suspension Degrees of Freedom .................................... 36 4.2 Determination of Anti-Squat ............................................................................................... 36 4.3 Design Constraints .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Modeling ............................................................................................................................. 37 4.5 Preliminary Design Options ................................................................................................ 38 4.5.1 Design 1: Coordinate Grid Design ............................................................................... 42 4.5.2 Design 2: Rotational Actuator Design .......................................................................... 43 4.5.3 Design 3: Single Motion Design .................................................................................. 47 4.6 Final Design ........................................................................................................................ 50 4.7 Prototyping .......................................................................................................................... 53 4.8 Test and Analysis ................................................................................................................ 56 4.8.1 Acceleration Test .......................................................................................................... 57 4.8.2 Slope Test ....................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Suspension Geometry and Computation

    Suspension Geometry and Computation

    Suspension Geometry and Computation By the same author: The Shock Absorber Handbook, 2nd edn (Wiley, PEP, SAE) Tires, Suspension and Handling, 2nd edn (SAE, Arnold). The High-Performance Two-Stroke Engine (Haynes) Suspension Geometry and Computation John C. Dixon, PhD, F.I.Mech.E., F.R.Ae.S. Senior Lecturer in Engineering Mechanics The Open University, Great Britain. This edition first published 2009 Ó 2009 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
  • Supercross Amateur Racing

    Supercross Amateur Racing

    Supercross Amateur Racing AMATEUR CLASS DESIGNATIONS Class Name Age Displacement Specifications 51cc Limited 4 - 8 0cc-51cc 2-stroke or 4-stroke 51cc Limited 4 - 6 and 51cc Limited 4 – 8 age range minicycles are both approved in this class 51cc Limited 4 - 6 0cc-51cc 2-stroke or 4-stroke Single-speed automatic. Maximum (adjusted length) wheelbase 36 inches. Maximum wheel size 10 inches. Maximum seat height 24 inches. No larger than 14 mm round intake. 51cc Limited 7 - 8 0cc-51cc 2-stroke or 4-stroke Single-speed automatic. Maximum (adjusted length) wheelbase 41 inches. Maximum wheel size 12 inches. Retrofitted 12-inch wheels are permitted on all class 2 minicycles. OEMs part must be used. No larger than 19mm round intake. Ultracross 50’s 4-8 0-51cc 2-stroke or 51cc Limited 4 - 6 and 51cc Limited 4 – 8 age range 4-stroke minicycles are both approved in this class 65cc 7 - 11 59cc-65cc 2-stroke Minimum wheel size 12 inches. Maximum front wheel 14 inches. Maximum (adjusted length) wheelbase 45 inches. Maximum wheelbase must maintain manufacturer specifications. 65cc 7 - 9 59cc-65cc 2-stroke Minimum wheel size 12 inches. Maximum front wheel 14 inches. Maximum (adjusted length) wheelbase 45 inches. Maximum wheelbase must maintain manufacturer specifications. 65cc 10 - 11 59cc-65cc 2-stroke Minimum wheel size 12 inches. Maximum front wheel 14 inches. Maximum (adjusted length) wheelbase 45 inches. Maximum wheelbase must maintain manufacturer specifications. 85cc 9 - 12 79cc-85cc 2-stroke Maximum front wheel 17” Minimum rear wheel 12” Maximum rear wheel 16” Maximum wheel base 51” Mini Senior 12 - 15 79cc-85cc 2-stroke or 75-150cc 4-stroke Maximum front wheel17” Minimum rear wheel 12” Maximum rear wheel 16” Maximum wheel base 51” Supermini 1 9 - 15 79cc-112cc 2-stroke or 75cc-150cc 4-stroke Maximum front wheel 19” Maximum rear wheel 16” Maximum wheel base 52” *Competitors 9 thru 11 yrs of age are only allowed to use a 79cc - 85cc 2-stroke minicycle if competing in this class.
  • Types of Divisible Load Overweight Permits – Perm 69 (07/09)

    Types of Divisible Load Overweight Permits – Perm 69 (07/09)

    State of New York Department of Transportation Central Permit Office Types of Divisible Load Overweight Permits – Perm 69 (07/09) Statewide Permit Types Type 1 (F1) Max. Axle and Grouping Weights in Lbs. Fee $360.00 Steering axle 22,400 Min. Axles 3 Any other Single axle 25,000 Max. Axles 4 Tandem Group 47,000 Min. Wheelbase 16 Feet Tridem Group 57,000 Max. Gross Vehicle Weight 97,400 Lbs. Max. Trailer Length 48 Feet Permitted Gross weight is based on the F1 formula : (1,250 x Wheelbase* ) + 42,500 * Overall Wheelbase in inches is rounded to the nearest whole foot. Type 1A (F1) - This permit type is Large Through Truck Restricted. Max. Axle and Grouping Weights in Lbs. Fee $750.00 (5 or 6 axles) Steering axle 22,400 $900.00 (7 or more axles) Any other Single axle 25,000 Min. Axles 5 Tandem Group 47,000 Min. Wheelbase 16 Feet Tridem Group 57,000 Max. Gross Vehicle Weight 102,000 Lbs. Quad 62,000 Max. Trailer Length 48 Feet Permitted Gross weight is based on the F1 formula : (1,250 x Wheelbase* ) + 42,500 * Overall Wheelbase in inches is rounded to the nearest whole foot. Type 7 (F2) - This permit type is Large Through Truck Restricted. Max. Axle and Grouping Weights in Lbs. Fee $750.00 (6 axles) Steering axle 22,400 $900.00 (7 or more axles) Any other Single axle 25,000 Min. Axles 6 Tandem Group 48,000 Min. Wheelbase 36 ½ feet Tridem Group 58,000 Max. Gross Vehicle Weight 107,000 Lbs.
  • Bendix ABS-6 Advanced with ESP Stability System

    Bendix ABS-6 Advanced with ESP Stability System

    Bendix® ABS-6 Advanced with ESP® Stability System Frequently Asked Questions to Help You Make an Intelligent Investment in Stability Contents: Key FAQs (Start here!)………….. Pg. 2 Stability Definitions …………….. Pg. 6 System Comparison ……………. Pg. 7 Function/Performance ………….. Pg. 9 Value ………………………………. Pg. 12 Availability/Applications ……….. Pg. 14 Vehicle System Integration …….. Pg. 16 Safety ………………………………. Pg. 17 Take the Next Step ………………. Pg. 18 Please note: This document is designed to assist you in the stability system decision process, not to serve as a performance guarantee. No system will prevent 100% of the incidents you may experience. This information is subject to change without notice © 2007 Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems LLC, a member of the Knorr-Bremse Group. All Rights Reserved. 03/07 1 Key FAQs What is roll stability? Roll stability counteracts the tendency of a vehicle, or vehicle combination, to tip over while changing direction (typically while turning). The lateral (side) acceleration creates a force at the center of gravity (CG), “pushing” the truck/tractor-trailer horizontally. The friction between the tires and the road opposes that force. If the lateral force is high enough, one side of the vehicle may begin to lift off the ground potentially causing the vehicle to roll over. Factors influencing the sensitivity of a vehicle to lateral forces include: the load CG height, load offset, road adhesion, suspension stiffness, frame stiffness and track width of vehicle. What is yaw stability? Yaw stability counteracts the tendency of a vehicle to spin about its vertical axis. During operation, if the friction between the road surface and the tractor’s tires is not sufficient to oppose lateral (side) forces, one or more of the tires can slide, causing the truck/tractor to spin.
  • 2021 Ram 1500 Classic

    2021 Ram 1500 Classic

    SEDANS MINIVANS/CROSSOVERS SPORT UTILITY TRUCKS/COMMERCIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 2021 RAM 1500 CLASSIC SELECT STANDARD FEATURES 3.6L Pentastar® V6 / 850RE 8-speed Automatic Air Conditioning — Manual Alternator — 160-amp Axle — 3.21 ratio Battery — 730-amp Cluster — Instrument, with 3.5-inch display screen for Driver Information Display Fuel Tank — 26-gallon Headlamps — Automatic quad-lens halogen with incandescent taillamps Mirrors — 6 x 9-inch Seats — 40/20/40 split-bench front seat with folding front armrest/cup holder, floor-mounted storage tray on Crew Cab (Quad Cab® and Crew Cab models include folding rear bench seat) Shock Absorbers — Heavy-duty, front and rear Spare Tire — Full-size Stabilizer Bar — Front and rear Steering — Electronic, rack and pinion Storage — Front, behind the seats (Regular Cab only) Properly secure all cargo. — Rear, in-floor bins, two with removable liners (Crew Cab only) — Rear, underseat compartment (Quad Cab and Crew Cab models only) Styled Steel Wheels — 17 x 7-inch Suspension — Front, upper and lower A-arms, coil springs, twin-tube shocks — Rear, five-link, coil springs, twin-tube shocks Tires — P265 / 70R17 BSW A/S Transfer Case — Electronic part-time (4x4 models only) Windows — Manual (Regular Cab only) — Power, front and rear with driver’s one-touch up/down (Quad Cab and Crew Cab models only) SAFETY & SECURITY Air Bags(2) — Advanced multistage front — Supplemental side-curtain — Supplemental front-seat side-mounted Brakes — Power-assisted four-wheel antilock disc Electronic Stability Control(3) — Includes Four-wheel Antilock Brake System, Brake Assist, All-Speed Traction Control, Rain Brake Support, Ready Alert Braking, Electronic Roll Mitigation, Hill Start Assist and Trailer Sway Damping(3) ParkView® Rear Back-Up Camera(22) ENGINES HORSEPOWER(17) TORQUE(17) Properly secure all cargo.
  • Sidecar Torsion Bar Suspension

    Sidecar Torsion Bar Suspension

    Ural (Урал) - Dnepr (Днепр) Russian Motorcycle Part XIV: Plunger, Swing-Arm and Torsion Bar Evolution ( Ernie Franke [email protected] 09 / 2017 Swing-Arms and Torsion Bars for Heavy Russian Motorcycles with Sidecars • Heavy Russian Motorcycle Rear-Wheel Swing-Arm Suspension –Historical Evolution of Rear-Wheel Suspension Trans-Literated Terms –Rear-Wheel Plunger Suspension • Cornet: Splined Hub • Journal: Shaft –Rear-Wheel Swing-Arm Suspension • Stroller, Pram: Sidecar • Rocker Arm: Between Sidecar Wheel Axle and Torsion Bar • One-Wheel Drive (1WD) • Swing-Arm – Rear-Drive Swing-Arm • Torsion Bar (Rod) • Sway Bar: Mounting Rod • Two-Wheel Drive (2WD) • Suspension Lever: Swing-Arm – Rear-Drive Swing-Arm • Swing Fork: Swing-Arm –Not Covered: Front-Wheel Suspension Torsion Bar • Sidecar Frames and Suspension Systems –Historical Evolution of Sidecar Suspension –Sidecar Rubber Bumper and Leaf-Spring Suspension –Sidecar Torsion Bar Suspension –Sidecar Swing-Arm Suspension • Recent Advances in Ural Suspension Systems –2006: Nylock Nuts Used to Secure Final Drive to Swing-Arm –2007: Bottom-Out Travel Limiter on Sidecar Swing-Arm –2008: Ball Bearings Replace Silent-Block Bushings in Both Front and Rear Swing-Arms Heavy Russian motorcycle suspension started with the plunger (coiled spring) rear-wheel suspension on the M-72. This was replaced with the swing-arm (pendulum) and dual hydraulic shock absorbers on the K-750. Similarly the sidecar suspension was upgraded from the spring-leaf 2 to rubber isolators and a swing-arm approach in the
  • Car Construction

    Car Construction

    CAR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS All specifications apply to all Quarter and Half classes unless otherwise specified. Dimension’s 1. Height Quarter Midgets: ........................50” maximum, including roll cage 2. Length (Measurements include the bumpers) Quarter Midgets: 84” maximum Half Midgets: 76” minimum, 88” maximum 3. Tire Size Front Maximum 11” diameter Rear maximum 12 1/2” diameter.As branded by the manufacturer. 4. Weight Quarter Midgets: Minimum 160 lbs. Half Midgets: Minimum 170 lbs. 5. Wheelbase (Measured center to center of axle. Both sides must be within specifications.) Quarter Midgets: 42” minimum, 56” maximum Half Midgets: 48” minimum, 56” maximum 6. Wheel Tread (Measured center to center of tires.) Quarter Midgets: 28” minimum, 36” maximum Half Midgets: 28” minimum, 36” maximum Car Constrution Axle A. Axle, axle hubs, or axle nuts may not extend beyond the outer edge of the wheel rim. B. All rear axles will be made out of aluminum, titanium or steel only. Battery A. All wet-cell batteries, which are mounted in the cockpit area must be enclosed and vented out of the cockpit area. B. All batteries must be securely mounted to prevent loss during operation. C. Battery and electronic ignition equipment not allowed on or in cars in the Honda and Briggs classes. Belly Pan A. The pan must extend from the front axle to the firewall. B. The ground clearance shall not exceed 3.5”. C. The belly pan must be constructed in such a manner as to comply with D. Aluminum: minimum thickness 0.040” (1) Steel: minimum thickness 0.025” (2) No open holes in the belly pan.
  • SUSPENSION SYSTEMS Making Everyday Smoother

    SUSPENSION SYSTEMS Making Everyday Smoother

    SUSPENSION SYSTEMS making everyday smoother VB-AIRSUSPENSION, THE IDEAL SOLUTION FOR ANY (SUSPENSION) PROBLEM. Product selection assistance Find the perfect solution for you! Product selection assistance I INTRODUCTION 03 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 INTRODUCTION 5 ABOUT US 7 PRODUCT GROUPS 9 TROUBLESHOOTING WE MAKE EVERY Table 1: Which product group? 11 FULL AIR SUSPENSION JOURNEY A GOOD Table 2: Find the perfect solution for you! 13 VB-NIVOAIR ONE. 15 VB-FULLAIR 2C A good suspension system must provide both spring force and damping, so that the vehicle feels both stable and comfortable to drive. In 17 VB-FULLAIR 4C order to achieve this, each vehicle is fitted with suspension (coil spring suspension, leaf suspension or torsion bar suspension) and shock absorbers. The suspension under the vehicle ensures that passengers and/or the cargo do not feel every bump in the road surface. The 19 VB-ACTIVEAIR shock absorbers dampen the movement of the suspension; without shock absorbers, the vehicle would continue to pitch and roll. 21 SEMI AIR SUSPENSION Unfortunately, the standard suspension fitted to your vehicle often does not provide optimum comfort. If the level of comfort does not Table 3: Find the perfect solution for you! meet your expectations, it can leave you feeling dissatisfied. We offer a suitable solution for every (suspension) problem to help resolve this dissatisfaction. Our innovative air suspension systems and suspension applications help to ensure optimum ride comfort, increased 23 VB-SEMIAIR BASIC SYSTEM stability and greater safety, so that you can enjoy a safe and worry-free journey and be more satisfied with your vehicle.
  • Study of the Torsion Bar Passive Suspension System

    Study of the Torsion Bar Passive Suspension System

    Minia Journal of Engineering & Technology (MJET), Vol. 37, No. 1. January 2018 STUDY OF THE TORSION BAR PASSIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM Mohamed Khairy1, S. Allam1 and M. Rabie2 1Automotive Technology Department, Faculty of Industrial Education, Helwan University. 2Automotive and Tractor Dept., College of Engineering, Minia University. E-mail of corresponding author: [email protected]. Abstract A torsion bar passive suspension is a general term for any vehicle suspension that uses a torsion bar as its main weight bearing spring. The main advantages of a torsion bar passive suspension system are durability, easy adjustability of ride height, and small profile along the width of the vehicle. It takes up less of the vehicle's interior volume than coil springs. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the ride height of a vehicle which adjusted by the torsion bar on the vehicle body vibration in torsion bar passive suspension system. In this work the study, a front suspension of double-wishbone type suspension with upper torsion bar is assigned as quarter car model and is considered for the performance index study. Tire speed, sprung mass weight and presence of the hump are taken into consideration as the operation parameters. The results show the change of the torsion bar bolt position has sufficient effect on the sprung mass acceleration Keywords: vehicle suspension systems, torsion bar, ride comfort. 1. Introduction One of the major subsystems in a modern passenger car is the suspension system. The suspension system of a road vehicle refers to the assembly between the sprung mass and the unsprung mass.
  • Automotive Service Modern Auto Tech Study Guide Chapter 67 & 69 Pages 1280 ­ 1346 Suspension & Steering 32 Points Automotive Service 1

    Automotive Service Modern Auto Tech Study Guide Chapter 67 & 69 Pages 1280 ­ 1346 Suspension & Steering 32 Points Automotive Service 1

    Automotive Service Modern Auto Tech Study Guide Chapter 67 & 69 Pages 1280 ­ 1346 Suspension & Steering 32 Points Automotive Service 1. The ____________________ system allows a vehicle’s tires & wheels to move up and down as they roll. Steering Suspension Brake Automotive Service 2. Suspension can be grouped into 2 broad categories: _________________ & ________________. Independent & Non­independent Coil Springs & Air Springs Active & Passive Automotive Service 3. The perfect suspension system balances understeer and oversteer, resulting in ______________ steering. Tight Neutral Loose Automotive Service 4. Compressing springs is known as ________. As springs extend, they are said to ________. Jounce, Rebound Bounce, Resound Dribble, Rebound Automotive Service 5. Springs can be one of 4 types: A. _________, B. __________, C. _________________ ______, & D. _______. Coil Leaf Air Torsion Bar Automotive Service 6. ______________ weight is all of the weight supported by the springs. __________________ weight is all of the weight not supported by the springs. The more sprung weight, the better the vehicle will ride. Spring, Unspring Sprang, Unsprang Sprung, Unsprung Automotive Service 7. Control arms are connected to the steering knuckles with pivoting joints called ___________ joints. Automotive Service Automotive Service 8. __________ ______________ limit spring oscillations (jounce & rebound), but don’t effect ride height Slack Absorbers Shock Absorbers Shock Restorers Automotive Service 9. ______ shocks are filled with low pressure nitrogen gas to prevent fluid aeration (bubble formation). Gas Water Air Automotive Service 10. Options on shock absorbers include the ________­___________________ feature & adjustable stiffness. Self­Leveling Self­Igniting Self­Energizing Automotive Service Automotive Service Automotive Service 11. A ______ assembly consists of a shock, coil spring & an upper damper/pivot bearing.
  • Design and Analysis of Leaf Spring in a Heavy Truck

    Design and Analysis of Leaf Spring in a Heavy Truck

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Journal of Innovative Technology and Research (IJITR) Godatha Joshua Jacob * et al. (IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH Volume No.5, Issue No.4, June – July 2017, 7041-7046. Design And Analysis Of Leaf Spring In A Heavy Truck GODATHA JOSHUA JACOB Mr M.DEEPAK M.Tech (machine design) Student, Dept.of Assistant professor, Dept.of Mechanical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Kakinada Institute Of Kakinada Institute Of Engineering And Technology, Engineering And Technology, (Approved by AICTE (Approved by AICTE and Affiliated to Jawaharlal and Affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological Nehru Technological University , Kakinada) University , Kakinada) Abstract: A leaf spring is a simple form of spring, commonly used for the suspension in wheeled vehicles. Leaf Springs are long and narrow plates attached to the frame of a trailer that rest above or below the trailer's axle. There are monoleaf springs, or single-leaf springs, that consist of simply one plate of spring steel. These are usually thick in the middle and taper out toward the end, and they don't typically offer too much strength and suspension for towed vehicles. Drivers looking to tow heavier loads typically use multileaf springs, which consist of several leaf springs of varying length stacked on top of each other. The shorter the leaf spring, the closer to the bottom it will be, giving it the same semielliptical shape a single leaf spring gets from being thicker in the middle. Springs will fail from fatigue caused by the repeated flexing of the spring.
  • Transverse Leaf Springs: a Corvette Controversy

    Transverse Leaf Springs: a Corvette Controversy

    Transverse Leaf Springs: A Corvette Controversy By Matt Miller Introduction A lot of people give Corvettes flack because they employ leaf springs. The mere mention of leaf springs conjures up images of suspensions on horse-drawn buggies, old cars and trucks, and Harbor Freight utility trailers. Even magazine reviews of the latest Corvettes talk about how “antiquated” their leaf spring designs are, and many a Corvette enthusiast has converted his car to aftermarket coilovers in the belief that they are inherently better than the composite transverse leaf springs found on the front and rear suspensions of all Corvettes since 1984. But is that true? Does the Corvette’s use of transverse leaf springs mean it has an inferior, outdated suspension design? The short answer is “No!” To find out why, we’ll cover some basics on springs and suspensions and see how the facts add up. Page 1 What is a Spring, Anyway? We all intuitively know what springs are. But technically speaking, a spring is an elastic mechanical device that stores potential energy. When mechanical energy is put into a spring, it deforms and can release that energy back in the opposite direction. We measure a spring’s energy storage by its “spring rate,” which defines its energy storage. The spring rate defines the increase in force required to move the spring a certain amount. For example, if a spring has a rate of 100 lb/in (pounds per inch), it means that 100 lbs of force will move one end of it 1”, an additional 100 lbs will move it another inch, and so on.