DOCSLIB.ORG

Modification and Simulation of Double Wishbone Front Suspension in Safari Suv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of Critical Reviews ISSN- 2394-5125 Vol 7, Issue 14, 2020 MODIFICATION AND SIMULATION OF DOUBLE WISHBONE FRONT SUSPENSION IN SAFARI SUV P. Ashoka Varthanan1, N. Jayasuriya2, V.Gowtham3 1, 2 Mechanical Engineering Department, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore – 641008, India, Email: [email protected] 3 Global Cylinder Managers, Wilhelmsen Group, USA Received: 08.04.2020 Revised: 10.05.2020 Accepted: 05.06.2020 Abstract Suspension is an indispensable element in automobile. Suspensions provide a safe and comfortable ride to the passengers. In this present work, a case study of existing double wishbone suspension and its application in sport utility vehicle (SUV) is done. The existing design of suspension in SUV produces more wear and decreases the life of the suspension parts. It also leads to reduction in the comfort of the passenger(s). A new design for the suspension mechanism is developed by altering the parameters of the existing safari dicor SUV’s double wishbone mechanism of suspension. Dynamic analysis was performed on the original SUV’s double wishbone suspension and the modified double swing mechanism of suspension. Roll angle at the centre of the wheels and the vertical displacement of the wheels during cornering were calculated from the analysis. A comparison is made between the original design and modified design to validate the best design. Keywords: Double wishbone suspension, double swing suspension, dynamic analysis, suspension system © 2020 by Advance Scientific Research. This is an open-access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.14.27 INTRODUCTION analysis using ADAMS software package. Stefano et al [7] The mechanism of suspension system connects the car body designed and developed a double wishbone front suspension to the wheel. The primary purpose of the suspension system system for vineyard-orchard tractor. Orlande and Chace [8] is to produce vertical deceleration of the car body and ensure evaluated speed, economy and accuracy of various computer ride comfort. Suspension is the term given to the system of software in determining load and displacement of the springs, shock absorbers and linkages that connects a vehicle suspension system of Chervrolet Malibu. Bael at al [9] to its wheels and allows relative motion between the two [1]. studied the influence of various hard points on the functional The automobile suspension takes up shocks and vibrations requirements like steer ability, vehicle handling by during the ride from the ride surface and provides the developing axiomatic design and performance analysis on passengers a comfortable travel. Suspension system different types of suspension. Jagirdar et al [10] executed prevents the chassis being damaged due to bumps and multi body analysis using ADAMS software on double potholes in ride surface [2]. The suspension system also wishbone suspension made up of double coil spring with serves to keep the tires in contact with road by providing twin damper configuration for military vehicles. William and reactive force in all ride surfaces [3]. Vehicle suspension Douglas discussed the various aspects of the suspension system must provide good handing performance and good systems and vehicle dynamics for a race car[11]. steering control during manoeuvring. It should ensure correct response of the vehicle to the control forces during In this present work, an exhaustive case study of safari dicor braking and acceleration [4]. The different suspension SUV’s double wishbone suspension is done. The drawbacks systems used in commercial automobiles are Double of the double wish bone suspension are rectified by Wishbone, Macpherson Strut, Leaf Spring, Torsion Rod, Semi incorporating design changes to the existing double wish trailing arm, Swing axle. bone suspension. Dynamic analysis is performed on both the original double wishbone suspension and modified double A variety of high class vehicles such as BMW X5, Benz M- wishbone suspension (double swing suspension) to Class, and Audi Q7 make use of double wise- bone determine the roll characteristics on right and left wheel of suspension. Zhen Zhang and Junhui [4] stated that a double the vehicle during cornering. wishbone suspension consists of upper and lower arms, swivel pin, spring, damper and a wheel. The double DESIGN METHODOLOGY wishbone type suspension system is also used in commercial Mechanism SUV’s. One end of the arms of double wishbone suspension is The double swing mechanism works similar to parallel attached to the vehicle’s chassis and the other end of the two unequal double wishbone suspension. The upper and lower links is connected to wheels of the vehicle. These two links arms of suspension are of different length and are parallel to behaves as rocker arm which oscillates about the fixed point. each other. This mechanism has four links as shown in The force produced during the suspension movement is Figure 1. This mechanism has one fixed link and two links acted in the wheels of the vehicle which forms the fourth link connecting the fixed link. Both the connecting links acts as of the mechanism. The upper and lower arm are connected rocker arm, which oscillates about fixed point. The fourth to the wheel using ball joint and they are connected to the link is connected to the connecting links at the other end chassis of the vehicle by using screw and bolt joint. through which the force acts. Link BC shown in fig 1 is the fourth link which represents the tire of the vehicle through Hazem Ali Attia [5] performed dynamic analysis of the which forces act on the vehicle. Link CB is the connecting link double wishbone suspension by using point-joint coordinate which makes up the lower arm. Link AB is also a connecting formulation to produce an equivalent constrained system of link which makes up the upper arm. Link AD is the fixed link particles and used particle dynamics laws to obtain the laws and the chassis of the vehicle. of motion. XiaobinNing et al [6] determined the ride comfort on different vehicles by carrying out kinematic and dynamic Journal of critical reviews 150 MODIFICATION AND SIMULATION OF DOUBLE WISHBONE FRONT SUSPENSION IN SAFARI SUV Fig. 1: Double Swing Mechanism in 2D sketch of the CATIA Software The proper functioning of the double swing mechanism can mechanism only when the links undergo constrained motion. only be achieved if the lengths of the links are in the The links should not be a rigid structure instead it should following order provide a motion when forces act on the link. The Grubler’s BC<AD<AB<DC (1) criterion for plane mechanism with constrained motion is The length of the tire should be less than the length of the subjected to double swing mechanism. The Grubler’s chassis and the lower arm must have greater length than the equation for planar mechanism is upper arm. The length of the arms should be higher in 3l-2j-4=0 (3) comparison with the fixed link and force link. The sum of the lengths of the force link and upper arm link Where, l – No of links, j – No of Binary joints or lower pairs. must also be less than the sum of lengths of fixed link and The Grubler’s Criterion is satisfied by substituting the values lower arm link to obtain proper functioning. of number of links and no of joints. The Grubler’s Criterion AB+BC<AD+DC (2) exhibits that the double swing mechanism has a constrained motion with input to the mechanism only at one end of the Kinematic design link which is tire of vehicle. The equivalent kinematic The links arranged as shown in Fig 1 can be regarded as a diagram for a double swing mechanism is shown in Fig 2. Fig. 2: Equivalent Kinematic diagram for double swing mechanism Geometry The double swing mechanism of suspension system is a type same for the double swing suspension and the values are not of parallel unequal double wishbone suspension. The double changed from the double wishbone suspension. The double swing suspension has upper arm and lower arm of different wishbone suspension is changed to double swing suspension length and same inclination. Unlike the existing double by changing the inclinations and lengths of upper and lower wishbone suspension, double swing suspension has the arms of the suspension. The table 1 compares the modified upper and lower arms of almost same angles of inclination. dimensions of double swing suspension with the original The parameters such as Kingpin Inclination, Toe angles, dimensions of the safari SUV double wishbone suspension. Camber angle, Caster angle and scrub radius are kept as Table 1Geometry modifications done on double wishbone suspension Double wishbone Double swing suspension suspension Upper arm inclination 23.5deg 12deg Lower arm inclination 9.2 deg 12.1deg The major changes from original double wishbone design are from 23.5deg to 12deg i.e. in the case of height change it is the Lower Arm inclination which is changed from 9.2deg to 44.5mm lower than it was before. 12.1deg i.e. in the case of height change it is 19mm higher than it was before. Upper arm inclination which is changed Journal of critical reviews 151 MODIFICATION AND SIMULATION OF DOUBLE WISHBONE FRONT SUSPENSION IN SAFARI SUV Roll centre turning moment. The roll centre of the existing safari SUV is The basic parameter in a suspension design is the roll centre below the ground. (RC). Roll centre of a vehicle is a precise and distinct imaginary point in the vehicle which is obtained from the The large distance between the centre of gravity (CG) and geometry of the suspension. The cornering forces of the roll centre of the vehicle gives rise to large turning moment suspension are reacted by the self-weight of the car at the during cornering.
Recommended publications
  • Suspension Geometry and Computation

    Suspension Geometry and Computation

    Suspension Geometry and Computation By the same author: The Shock Absorber Handbook, 2nd edn (Wiley, PEP, SAE) Tires, Suspension and Handling, 2nd edn (SAE, Arnold). The High-Performance Two-Stroke Engine (Haynes) Suspension Geometry and Computation John C. Dixon, PhD, F.I.Mech.E., F.R.Ae.S. Senior Lecturer in Engineering Mechanics The Open University, Great Britain. This edition first published 2009 Ó 2009 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.
  • REV 2011 Formula SAE Electric – Suspension Design

    REV 2011 Formula SAE Electric – Suspension Design

    REV 2011 Formula SAE Electric – Suspension Design Marcin Kiszko 20143888 School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia Supervisor: Dr. Adam Wittek School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia Final Year Project Thesis School of Mechanical Engineering University of Western Australia Submitted: June 6th, 2011 Project Summary This thesis covers the suspension and steering design process for REV’s entirely new 2011 Formula SAE electric race vehicle. The team intends to utilise four wheel-hub motors endowing the vehicle with all-wheel-drive and extraordinary control over torque vectoring. The design objectives were to create a cost-effective, easy to manufacture and simple race suspension that would act as a predictable development base for the pioneering power train. The ubiquitous unequal-length, double-wishbone suspension with pull-rod spring damper actuation was chosen as the underlying set up. Much of the design took place during low technical knowledge as none of the team members or supervisors had pervious experience in FSAE. As a result a great portion of the design was based on UWAM’s 2001-2003 vehicles as these were subject to similar resource constraints and preceded the complex Kinetics suspension system. The kinematic design of the wishbones and steering was completed on graph paper while design of the components including FE analysis was carried out in SolidWorks. The spring and dampers where set up for pure roll, steady state conditions. The major hurdle during design was overcoming the conflicting dimension of the electric wheel- hub motor and pull-rod. Most of the suspension components are to be made from Chrome Molybdenum steel (AISI 4130).
  • Caster Camber Tire-Wear Angles

    Caster Camber Tire-Wear Angles

    BASIC WHEEL ALIGNMENT odern steering and ples. Therefore, let’s review these basic the effort needed to turn the wheel. suspension systems alignment angles with an eye toward Power steering allows the use of more are great examples of typical complaints and troubleshooting. positive caster than would be accept- solid geometry at able with manual steering. work. Wheel align- Caster Too little caster can make steering ment integrates all the factors of steer- Caster is the tilt of the steering axis of unstable and cause wheel shimmy. Ex- Ming and suspension geometry to pro- each front wheel as viewed from the tremely negative caster and the related vide safe handling, good ride quality side of the vehicle. Caster is measured shimmy can contribute to cupped wear and maximum tire life. in degrees of an angle. If the steering of the front tires. If caster is unequal Front wheel alignment is described axis tilts backward—that is, the upper from side to side, the vehicle will pull in terms of angles formed by steering ball joint or strut mounting point is be- toward the side with less positive (or and suspension components. Tradi- hind the lower ball joint—the caster more negative) caster. Remember this tionally, five alignment angles are angle is positive. If the steering axis tilts when troubleshooting a complaint of checked at the front wheels—caster, forward, the caster angle is negative. vehicle pull or wander. camber, toe, steering axis inclination Caster is not measured for rear wheels. (SAI) and toe-out on turns. When we Caster affects straightline stability Camber move from two-wheel to four-wheel and steering wheel return.
  • Wheel Alignment Simplified

    Wheel Alignment Simplified

    The WHAT and WHY of Toe Caster - Camber Kingpin Inclination - Thrust Angle Steering Angle – Wheel setback WHEEL ALIGNMENT SIMPLIFIED Wheel alignment is often considered complicated and hard to understand In the days of the rigid chassis construction with solid axles, when tyres were poor and road speeds were low, wheel alignment was simply a matter of ensuring that the wheels rolled along the road in parallel paths. This was easily accomplished by means of using a toe gauge or simple tape measure. The steering wheel could then also simply be repositioned on the splines of the steering shaft. Camber and Caster was easily adjustable by means of shims. Today wheel alignment is of course more sophisticated as there are several angles to consider when doing wheel alignment on the modern vehicle with Independent suspension systems, good performing tyres and high road speeds. Below are the most common angles and their terminology and for the correction of wheel alignment and the diagnoses thereof, the understanding of the principals of these angles will become necessary. Doing the actual corrections of wheel alignment is a fairly simple task and in many instances it is easily accomplished by some mechanical adjustments. However Wheel Alignment diagnosis is not so straightforward and one will need to understand the interaction between the wheel alignment angles as well as the influence the various angles have on each other. In addition there are also external factors one will need to consider. Wheel Alignment Specifications are normally given in angular values of degrees and minutes A circle consists of 360 segments called DEGREES, symbolized by the indicator ° Each DEGREE again has 60 segments called MINUTES symbolized by the indicator ‘.
  • Instructions for M-Xxxx-Xxxx

    Instructions for M-Xxxx-Xxxx

    M-9602-M Spring and Stabilizer Bar Kit w/ MagneRide Calibration NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR AGREEMENT AND WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FORD PERFORMANCE PARTS Please visit www. performanceparts.ford.com for the most current instruction and warranty information. PLEASE READ ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. AT ANY TIME YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE CALL THE FORD PERFORMANCE TECHLINE AT 1-800-367-3788 M-9602-M is designed for 2018+ Mustangs equipped with MagneRide and includes a unique MagneRide calibration that is loaded with the included Procal voucher and software. Please reference the instruction tab on the Procal and make sure you use version 3.9+ Kit Includes: Front Stabilizer Bar Front Springs Rear Stabilizer Bar Rear Springs MagneRide Tuning Calibration Front Stabilizer Bar Removal NOTICE: Suspension fasteners are critical parts that affect the performance of vital components and systems. Failure of these fasteners may result in major service expense. Use the same or equivalent parts if replacement is necessary. Do not use a replacement part of lesser quality or substitute design. Tighten fasteners as specified. 1. Remove all 4 wheels and tires and set aside. 2. On both sides. 1. NOTE: The stabilizer bar links are designed with low friction ball joints that have a low breakaway torque. NOTE: Use the hex-holding feature to prevent the ball stud from turning while removing the stabilizer bar link nut. Remove and the front stabilizer bar link lower nut. 2. Position aside the front stabilizer bar link. Factory Ford shop manuals are available from Helm Publications, 1-800-782-4356 Techline 1-800-367-3788 Page 1 of 41 IS-1850-0631 M-9602-M Spring and Stabilizer Bar Kit w/ MagneRide Calibration NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT PRIOR AGREEMENT AND WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FORD PERFORMANCE PARTS 4.
  • Product Information Sheet Steering and Suspension System Trainer

    Product Information Sheet Steering and Suspension System Trainer

    Product Information Sheet Steering and Suspension System Trainer This real component trainer provides the instructor with a . Remove, inspect, and install coil springs and spring working light vehicle steering and suspension system for insulators. group or whole-class demonstration. Inspect, replace, and adjust track rod ends, track rod sleeves, and clamps. This includes all the individual components of the system . Remove, inspect, and install upper and lower wishbones, presented on a moveable, steel frame so that each bushes, shafts, and rebound bumpers. component can be clearly identified. Remove, inspect, and install hub carrier assemblies. Inspect, remove, and replace dampers. The system comprises front wheel assemblies, MacPherson strut and coil spring assemblies, road wheels and power Items Included: steering rack. Trainer (right-hand and left-hand drive options available) . The trainer can also be used in conjunction with our Other Items Required: optional cloud-based software, which offers online practical tasks as well as interactive theory presentations, . Automotive workshop tools investigations, and assessments, which link directly to the . AC supply outlet (110V/230V options available) practical activities carried out using this resource. General Information: Trainer Enables Demonstrations of the Following: Trainer Dimensions (W x D x H): . Introduce the steering and suspension system trainer. 1750 x 1250 x 1500 mm / 69 x 49 x 59 inches . Inspect steering shaft universal joint, flexible coupling, Packed Volume: Approx. 3.67m3 / 130ft3 collapsible column, lock cylinder mechanism, and Packed Weight: Approx. 360kg / 795lb steering wheel. Packed Dimensions (W x D x H): . Disassemble, inspect, and reassemble rack and pinion 1904 x 1244 x 1550 mm / 75 x 49 x 62 inches steering gear.
  • Development and Analysis of a Multi-Link Suspension for Racing Applications

    Development and Analysis of a Multi-Link Suspension for Racing Applications

    Development and analysis of a multi-link suspension for racing applications W. Lamers DCT 2008.077 Master’s thesis Coach: dr. ir. I.J.M. Besselink (Tu/e) Supervisor: Prof. dr. H. Nijmeijer (Tu/e) Committee members: dr. ir. R.M. van Druten (Tu/e) ir. H. Vun (PDE Automotive) Technische Universiteit Eindhoven Department Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control Group Eindhoven, May, 2008 Abstract University teams from around the world compete in the Formula SAE competition with prototype formula vehicles. The vehicles have to be developed, build and tested by the teams. The University Racing Eindhoven team from the Eindhoven University of Technology in The Netherlands competes with the URE04 vehicle in the 2007-2008 season. A new multi-link suspension has to be developed to improve handling, driver feedback and performance. Tyres play a crucial role in vehicle dynamics and therefore are tyre models fitted onto tyre measure- ment data such that they can be used to chose the tyre with the best characteristics, and to develop the suspension kinematics of the vehicle. These tyre models are also used for an analytic vehicle model to analyse the influence of vehicle pa- rameters such as its mass and centre of gravity height to develop a design strategy. Lowering the centre of gravity height is necessary to improve performance during cornering and braking. The development of the suspension kinematics is done by using numerical optimization techniques. The suspension kinematic objectives have to be approached as close as possible by relocating the sus- pension coordinates. The most important improvements of the suspension kinematics are firstly the harmonization of camber dependant kinematics which result in the optimal camber angles of the tyres during driving.
  • (Title of the Thesis)*

    (Title of the Thesis)*

    Reconfigurable Integrated Control for Urban Vehicles with Different Types of Control Actuation by Mansour Ataei A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2017 © Mansour Ataei 2017 Examining committee membership: The following served on the Examining Committee for this thesis. The decision of the Examining Committee is by majority vote. Supervisors: Prof. Amir Khajepour Professor Mechanical and Mechatronics Department Prof. Soo Jeon Associate Mechanical and Mechatronics Department Professor External Prof. Fengjun Yan Associate McMaster University Examiner: Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering Internal- Prof. Nasser Lashgarian Azad Associate System Design Engineering external: Professor Internal: Prof. William Melek Professor Mechanical and Mechatronics Department Internal: Prof. Ehsan Toyserkani Professor Mechanical and Mechatronics Department ii AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. iii Abstract Urban vehicles are designed to deal with traffic problems, air pollution, energy consumption, and parking limitations in large cities. They are smaller and narrower than conventional vehicles, and thus more susceptible to rollover and stability issues. This thesis explores the unique dynamic behavior of narrow urban vehicles and different control actuation for vehicle stability to develop new reconfigurable and integrated control strategies for safe and reliable operations of urban vehicles. A novel reconfigurable vehicle model is introduced for the analysis and design of any urban vehicle configuration and also its stability control with any actuation arrangement.
  • MODELING of MULTIBODY DYNAMICS in FORMULA SAE VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University

    MODELING of MULTIBODY DYNAMICS in FORMULA SAE VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University

    MODELING OF MULTIBODY DYNAMICS IN FORMULA SAE VEHICLE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Swapnil Pravin Bansode In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering May 2020 Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana ii THE PURDUE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL Dr. Jing Zhang, Chair Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering Dr. Hamid Dalir Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering Dr. Lingxi Li Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Approved by: Dr. Jie Chen Head of the Graduate Program iii Dedicated to loving memory of my mother and grandmother. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Jing Zhang for providing guidance and being an incredible source of knowledge throughout my research work. I would like to thank members of advisory committee, Dr. Hamid Dalir and Dr. Lingxi Li for sharing their thoughts and feedback which helped me broaden my perspective of research work. I would also like to thank Mr. Jerry Mooney for his valuable inputs for my thesis. I would like to thank IUPUI and entire staff of Department of Mechanical and Energy Engineering for providing support and assistance during various stages of my research. I would also like to thank my lab mates Tejesh, Harshal, Michael Golub, Jian, Xuehui and Lingbin for their support. Lastly, I would like to thank my aunt and all my family, for supporting me both financially and emotionally , along with my friends, Madhura, Tripthi, Jay, Fermin, Sailee and Riddhi for always being with me throughout my graduate journey.
  • Ride Control Defined

    Ride Control Defined

    RIDE CONTROL DEFINED According to Newton's First Law, a moving body will continue moving in a straight line until it is acted upon by another force. Newton's Second Law states that for each action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In the case of the automobile, whether the disturbing force is in the form of a wind-gust, an incline in the roadway, or the cornering forces produced by tires, the force causing the action and the force resisting the action will always be in balance. Many things affect vehicles in motion. Weight distribution, speed, road conditions and wind are some factors that affect how vehicles travel down the highway. Under all these variables however, the vehicle suspension system including the shocks, struts and springs must be in good condition. Worn suspension components may reduce the stability of the vehicle and reduce driver control. They may also accelerate wear on other suspension components. Replacing worn or inadequate shocks and struts will help maintain good ride control as they: Control spring and suspension movement Provide consistent handling and braking Prevent premature tire wear Help keep the tires in contact with the road Maintain dynamic wheel alignment Control vehicle bounce, roll, sway, dive and acceleration squat Reduce wear on other vehicle systems Promote even and balanced tire and brake wear Reduce driver fatigue Suspension concepts and components have changed and will continue to change dramatically, but the basic objective remains the same: 1. Provide steering stability with good handling characteristics 2. Maximize passenger comfort Achieving these objectives under all variables of a vehicle in motion is called ride control 1 BASIC TERMINOLOGY To begin this training program, you need to possess some very basic information.
  • Design and Development of Multi-Link Suspension Suspension System

    Design and Development of Multi-Link Suspension Suspension System

    ISSN: 2455-2631 © June 2019 IJSDR | Volume 4, Issue 6 Design and Development of Multi-Link Suspension Suspension System 1Piyush Parida, 2Vaibhav Itkikar, 3Harshal Patil, 4Sandip Patil 1,2,3,4UG Students Mechanical Engineering Department G.H. Raisoni College of Engineering and Management, Chas, Ahmednagar, India Abstract: In order to provide a comfortable ride to the passengers and avoid additional stresses in motor car frame, the car should neither bounce or roll or sway the passengers when cornering nor pitch when accelerating. For this purpose the virtual prototype of suspension systems were built in software MSC ADAMS/CAR and suspensions for military truck were analyzed keeping in mind the optimization of suspension parameters. As there is tremendous development in Suspension Technology, Multi-Link suspension system are considered better independent suspension system among all other independent suspension system. Its simple design and construction makes it way more convenient to install and serve its purpose. As there is vast growth in Agriculture, farming becoming more and more advanced in terms of technology and in that transport vehicles play important role in making agriculture more productive. We saw different scenario where agriculture transport vehicles collapsing because of their conventional suspension system fails to stabalize the loaded vehicle on different road conditions. We tried to see the improvement in performance of vehicle in stabalizing itself by using Multi- Link suspension system. Keywords: Suspension, links, vibrations, Multi body dynamic analysis (MBD) 1. INTRODUCTION In heavy transport vehicle field existing dependent suspension system unit is used. If some have that is leaf spring suspension. In all cases Leaf spring design for full load condition.
  • Calculation of Dynamic Forces and Analysis of Front Upright for ATV

    Calculation of Dynamic Forces and Analysis of Front Upright for ATV

    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 04 | Apr 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Calculation of Dynamic Forces and Analysis of Front Upright for ATV Kritika Singh1, Kanishka Gabel2 1,2Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India ---------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract – Paper presents the calculation of various 1.1 Vehicle Specifications dynamic forces that acts on the front upright (also called Knuckle) of an ATV so that we can precisely design and The ATV was designed for the BAJA SAEINDIA event. Thus analyze the uprights. Precise calculation of forces leads to it’s designing is done according to the rules specified in the the optimization of weight. Uprights play an important role rulebook [1]. in carrying the complete wheel assembly with itself. Loads of Table -1: Vehicle Specifications the tires are directly transferred to the Uprights, making it more prone to failure if not properly designed with the right forces. The Front Upright has a steering arm, brake caliper Dimension Front Rear mounting, upper and lower suspension arm attached to it. Lower the weight of the Front Upright, higher is the Overall length, width and 1.97 m, 1.54 m and 1.51 m dynamic stability of the vehicle as it contributes to unsprung height mass. Wheelbase (L) 1.34 m Key Words: Front Upright, ATV, A arm, Dynamic forces, Knuckle, Vehicle Dynamics, Analysis Track width (B) 1.32 m 1.27 m Height of center of 0.56 m 1. INTRODUCTION gravity (H) The Front Uprights are the most vital element in the front Kerb Mass of vehicle 200 kg suspension assembly of an ATV (All-Terrain Vehicle).