DOCSLIB.ORG

RARITAN RIVER DRAWBRIDGE Section 1 Cover Letter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JULY 16, 2015 Request For Proposal (RFP) No. 15-044 Design, Engineering and Construction Assistance Services for the Replacement of the RARITAN RIVER DRAWBRIDGE Section 1 Cover Letter ............................................................................................................... Page 1 Section 2 Qualifications of Firms ............................................................................................... Page 2 Section 3 Full-Time Office Certification ..................................................................................... Page 6 Section 4 Qualifications of Individuals ....................................................................................... Page 7 Resumes ................................................................................................................. Page 12 Section 5 Key Personnel Certification ..................................................................................... Page 66 Firm References ...................................................................................................... Page 67 Project Manager References ................................................................................... Page 72 Key Personnel References ...................................................................................... Page 73 Work History with NJ ............................................................................................... Page 80 Section 6 Technical Section ................................................................................................... Page 85 Section 7 Team Organization/Resource Allocation ................................................................ Page 95 Section 8 Quality Assurance Plan .......................................................................................... Page 99 Section 9 Schedule .............................................................................................................. Page 101 Appendix Additional Qualifications ........................................................................................ Page A-1 Cover Letter Section 1 Request For Proposal (RFP) No. 15-044 Design, Engineering and Construction Assistance Services for the Replacement of the RARITAN RIVER DRAWBRIDGE SECTION 1 Cover Letter New Jersey Transit July 16, 2015 One Penn Plaza East Newark, NJ 07105-2246 Attn: Taishida S. Chapman Re: RFP No. 15-044 – Design, Engineering & Construction Assistance Services for the Replacement of Raritan River Drawbridge Dear Ms. Chapman, The Hardesty & Hanover/Gannett Fleming Joint Venture is pleased to submit this proposal for the Design, Engineering and Construction Assistance Services for the Replacement of Raritan River Drawbridge. Our Team has been assembled to deliver the project goals of this contract by offering proven project management, the highest technical expertise in movable bridge and rail systems design, experience in navigating the environmental review process, and true constructability know-how. We are committed to meeting the project objectives and delivering this contract on schedule to meet the FTA grant requirements. Our Joint Venture combines the resources and technical expertise of two nationally renowned firms, whose roots are planted in this region, have outstanding portfolios of rail/transit projects, and strong relationship with NJ TRANSIT. Established over 125 years ago, Hardesty & Hanover (H&H) is one of the most accomplished bridge firms nationwide, with a reputation of excellence and creativity. H&H’s movable bridges are known for their longevity, reliability and being maintenance-friendly. Many have been in service for nearly a century, like the NJ TRANSIT’s Lower Hack and Amtrak’s Dock Lift Bridge in Newark. H&H is also known for pushing the technological boundaries, having designed some of the largest, state-of-the-art movable bridges in the world. Examples include the signature Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge over the Potomac River in Maryland and the Jacques Chaban-Delmas Bridge in France, which is the longest vertical lift bridge in Europe. Gannett Fleming (GF) is one of the leading firms in global rail and transit industry, with extensive expertise in rail systems and some of the best resources in catenary, traction power, signals/train control, telecommunications, security, and rail operations. GF has a long-standing relationship with NJ Transit, having delivered critical projects, such as the Portal Bridge and the on-going Superstorm Sandy Substation Hardening/Resiliency Program at six locations including the Bay Head Rail Yard. H&H and GF have a strong history working in tandem to deliver the engineering for award-winning railroad movable bridges. This includes Amtrak’s Niantic River Bridge and MNR’s Peck Bridge. H&H’s lengthy portfolio of railroad movable bridges includes the recently completed Port River Bridges (2008) and the Jacques Chaban-Delmas Bridge (2013). Additionally, H&H has five other railroad movable bridges currently in final design or construction. Recognizing that construction staging, and, in particular, foundation work will be a major focus areas of this project, our Team includes Haley & Aldrich, a leading geotechnical firm currently working on some of the largest bridge replacement projects in the region, including the Goethals and Kosciuszko Bridge. Bringing the contractor’s insight to the design process, our Team also includes Griffin Engineering, a construction engineering firm, who has hands-on knowledge of the existing site conditions. Our hand-picked key project staff bring the right mixture of experience, personal enthusiasm, and commitment to teamwork and partnership with NJ TRANSIT necessary for the project success. Our proposed Project Manager, Visha Szumanski, PE, who has served in high-level technical and management roles on complex rail/transit projects, such as the Second Avenue Subway and Penn Station Redevelopment, will be 100% dedicated to the management of this project. She is well known to NJ TRANSIT having successfully delivered TOC contracts. She will be assisted by two Deputies: Rich Cross, PE (GF), who delivered the design for the Portal Bridge and David Tuckman, PE who is one of the leading design managers at H&H. We believe that we have the right team to meet the challenges of this contract and we are excited about this opportunity to assist NJT in this major capital improvement project. Very truly yours, Paul Skelton, Principal (H&H) Hardesty & Hanover/Gannett Fleming JV Request For Proposal (RFP) No. 15-044 Design, Engineering and Construction Assistance Services for the Replacement of the RARITAN RIVER Qualifications of Firms Section 2 DRAWBRIDGE SECTION 2 Qualifications of Firms The Hardesty & Hanover/Gannett Fleming Joint Venture Team combines the resources of two firms who are the industry front- runners in their respective focus areas for this project: Movable Bridges – Hardesty & Hanover; and Rail Systems – Gannett Fleming. The JV partners will be assisted by highly qualified specialty subconsultants, including many certified DBE firms. HARDESTY & HANOVER H&H’s Recent Movable RR Bridges Established in 1887 and ranked in the top 15 in ENR’s list of bridge engineering firms, Hardesty & Hanover is one of the most seasoned, reputable, and accomplished bridge engineering firms in the region. H&H’s portfolio includes many landmark structures in the region over last 125 years. H&H offers a host of engineering services for bridges, tunnels, rail/transit, highways and special structures, including feasibility studies, structure design/rehabilitation, and mechanical/electrical services for movable bridges. Our multi- discipline staff of expert engineers and architects combine in-depth knowledge of the most current technologies with the firm’s historical perspective to develop creative and efficient solutions, which can be successfully implemented in environmentally sensitive areas. H&H is world renowned for expertise in MOVABLE BRIDGES. The firm designed the first Niantic River Bridge, CT (2013) vertical lift bridge in the US, the Halsted Street Bridge in Chicago, built in 1894, which Northeast Corridor had a lift height of 150ft. Since that day, H&H has been continuously pushing the technological limits of movable bridge engineering, designing record breaking structures, such as the Tomlinson Lift Bridge, CT, which is the heaviest lift span in the Northeast, and the Chaban-Delmas Lift Bridge in France, featuring the longest lift span in Europe. RAIL & TRANSIT has always been at the center of H&H engineering practice. The first railroad bridge designed by H&H was built 125 years ago (Red Rock Bridge over Colorado River). To this day, H&H continues to be the leading expert in rail movable bridge and provide rail clients with innovative, efficient and dependable designs for structures carrying passengers and freight throughout the North America. In the last ten Port River Bridges, Australia (2008) years alone, H&H has delivered over 50 projects involving railroad structures on the Freight Rail Northeast Corridor, for NJ TRANSIT, Amtrak, Metro-North, ConnDOT and MBTA. H&H’s most recent movable railroad bridge projects, include: Niantic River Bridge, CT (2013) – 140 ft. single leaf bascule on Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor. Considered by Amtrak to be one of their most complex capital improvement projects and delivered jointly by H&H and GF. Port River Bascule Bridges, Australia (2008) – two 200 ft. single leaf bascule bridges: railroad and highway. Pronounced a “brilliant
Recommended publications
  • RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak

    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak

    RAILROAD COMMUNICATIONS Amtrak Amtrak Police Department (APD) Frequency Plan Freq Input Chan Use Tone 161.295 R (160.365) A Amtrak Police Dispatch 71.9 161.295 R (160.365) B Amtrak Police Dispatch 100.0 161.295 R (160.365) C Amtrak Police Dispatch 114.8 161.295 R (160.365) D Amtrak Police Dispatch 131.8 161.295 R (160.365) E Amtrak Police Dispatch 156.7 161.295 R (160.365) F Amtrak Police Dispatch 94.8 161.295 R (160.365) G Amtrak Police Dispatch 192.8 161.295 R (160.365) H Amtrak Police Dispatch 107.2 161.205 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Primary 146.2 160.815 (simplex) Amtrak Police Car-to-Car Secondary 146.2 160.830 R (160.215) Amtrak Police CID 123.0 173.375 Amtrak Police On-Train Use 203.5 Amtrak Police Area Repeater Locations Chan Location A Wilmington, DE B Morrisville, PA C Philadelphia, PA D Gap, PA E Paoli, PA H Race Amtrak Police 10-Codes 10-0 Emergency Broadcast 10-21 Call By Telephone 10-1 Receiving Poorly 10-22 Disregard 10-2 Receiving Well 10-24 Alarm 10-3 Priority Service 10-26 Prepare to Copy 10-4 Affirmative 10-33 Does Not Conform to Regulation 10-5 Repeat Message 10-36 Time Check 10-6 Busy 10-41 Begin Tour of Duty 10-7 Out Of Service 10-45 Accident 10-8 Back In Service 10-47 Train Protection 10-10 Vehicle/Person Check 10-48 Vandalism 10-11 Request Additional APD Units 10-49 Passenger/Patron Assist 10-12 Request Supervisor 10-50 Disorderly 10-13 Request Local Jurisdiction Police 10-77 Estimated Time of Arrival 10-14 Request Ambulance or Rescue Squad 10-82 Hostage 10-15 Request Fire Department 10-88 Bomb Threat 10-16
  • Number 7, Pages 811-954

    Number 7, Pages 811-954

    You're viewing an archived copy from the New Jersey State Library. 00 O'UJ ~O U ~O>- .... o IX U. o a u. ~ .... a o en I ~ IX u.x UJ a .... Z .... .. 1000 zen"" UJUJ2:> .... ~ \fI 0::: X N <CU .c 0.. IX co UJ<C o o .. >­ "IX .., z<C z OIX ~t:O Z .... ~OO <C-JN .... U II'IZ THE JOURNAL OF STATE AGENCY RULEMAKING ;:» UJ O~ZIX UJOUI- VOLUME 21 NUMBER 7 April 3, 1989 Indexed 21 N.J.R. 811-954 (Includes adopted rules filed through March 10, 1989) RULEMAKING IN THIS ISSUE RULE PROPOSALS Private passenger automobile insurers: excess profi ts . Interested persons comment deadline 812 Automobile insurance personal injury protectio medical fee schedules 842(b) AGRICULTURE LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY '. Commercial values of primary plant nutrients . 813(a) Practice of optometry: withdrawal of proposal on d~ation BANKING of duties to ancillary personnel................... 881(a) Proposed interstate acquisition: determination of Board of Medical Examiners: withdrawal of pre-proposal eligibility..................... 814(3) concerning repeal of NJ.A.C. 13:35-IA 937(a) COMMUNITY AFFAIRS Practice and procedure before Violent Crimes Congregate Housing Services Program: service Compensation Board . 881(b) subsidies formula . 816(a) COMMERCE, ENERGY AND ECONOMIC EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT Enforcement of drug free school zones 817(a) Definition of electric facility ... 882(a) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TRANSPORTATION 90-day construction permits . 819(a) Handicapped parking space on Route 7 in Belleville 883(a) Hazardous waste facility liability coverage: corporate Restricted parking and standing along U.S. 22 in Lopatcong, guarantee option . 823(a) Route 35 in Eatontown.
  • 1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited

    1 of 1 Forecast of Contracts to Be Advertised and Proposals to Be Solicited

    Welcome to the latest MTA "Eye on the Future," in which we present currently funded capital projects that are planned to be advertised from September 2017 through August 2018. The "Eye" is hosted along with other information and resources about the MTA Capital Program in one convenient location. It is part of our commitment to improve business practices and we hope that it is useful to you. The MTA Capital Program is very important for the safety and reliability of the MTA transportation system and is vital for the regional economy. As described in this issue of the "Eye," the MTA is preparing to undertake 145 projects valued at approximately $4.71 billion in capital work. This work spans many areas, including civil, structural, and electrical, as well as new technologies. These projects are crucial for the reliability, growth and resiliency of the system and contribute to the regional economy. This amount of investment is projected to generate approximately $8.29 billion in economic activity for the New York region. We want to make sure you’re aware of our recently-launched web-portal: MyMTA.info. This portal enables suppliers and bidders to the MTA to search procurement opportunities and information across all MTA agencies, respond to sourcing events online, select categories for the goods and services your sell and more. Contractors and suppliers have a critical stake in the success of the Capital Program. We appreciate your interest in and support of the projects included in this issue of the "Eye," and we look forward to your participation.
  • No Action Alternative Report

    No Action Alternative Report

    No Action Alternative Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. NEC FUTURE Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 3. Approach to No Action Alternative.............................................................................................................. 4 3.1 METHODOLOGY FOR SELECTING NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS .................................................................................... 4 3.2 DISINVESTMENT SCENARIO ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 4. No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................................... 6 4.1 TRAIN SERVICE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 4.2 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE RAIL PROJECTS ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Funded Projects or Projects with Approved Funding Plans (Category 1) ............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Funded or Unfunded Mandates (Category 2) .......................................................................................................
  • Rainready Calumet Corridor, IL Plan

    Rainready Calumet Corridor, IL Plan

    RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan RainReady Calumet Corridor, IL Plan PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS MARCH 2017 ©2017 CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS Purpose of the RainReady Plan 1 A Citizen’s Guide to a RainReady Robbins i The Problem 2 The Path Ahead 3 VILLAGE OF ROBBINS How to Use This Plan 4 COMMUNITY SNAPSHOT 1 INTRODUCTION 5 ROBBINS, IL AT A GLANCE 2 The Vision 5 Flooding Risks and Resilience Opportunities 3 THE PROBLEM 6 RAINREADY ROBBINS COMMUNITY SURVEY 8 CAUSES AND IMPACTS OF URBAN FLOODING 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS IN ROBBINS, IL Your Homes and Neighborhoods 10 THE PATH FORWARD 23 Your Business Districts and Shopping Centers 12 What Can We Do? 23 Your Industrial Centers and How to Approach Financing Transportation Corridors 14 RainReady Communities 26 Your Open Space and Natural Areas 16 Community Assets 18 PARTNERS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 29 Steering Committees 30 COMMUNITY PRIORITIES 20 Technical Advisory Committee 33 Non-TAC Advisors 33 RAINREADY ACTION PLAN 22 THE PLANNING PROCESS 34 Purpose of the RainReady Plan 34 RAINREADY ROBBINS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Planning and Outreach Approach 36 Goal 1: Reorient 24 Goal 2: Repair 28 REGIONAL CONTEXT 42 Goal 3: Retrofit 31 RAINREADY: REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT SUMMARY 50 RAINREADY SOLUTIONS GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 55 A RainReady Future is Possible! 55 RAINREADY GOALS 56 The Three R’s: Reorient, Repair, Retrofit 56 THE THREE R’S 61 GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS 62 Goal 1: Reorient 64 Goal 2: Repair 66 Goal 3: Retrofit 67 RAINREADY CALUMET CORRIDOR PLAN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose of the RainReady Plan From more intense storms and chronic urban flooding to economic constraints and aging infrastructure, communities across the nation must find ways to thrive in the midst of shocks and stresses.
  • NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Turnpike Revenuebonds,Series2017g

    NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Turnpike Revenuebonds,Series2017g

    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED DECEMBER 8, 2017 NEW ISSUE – Book-Entry Only See “RATINGS” herein In the opinion of Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., Bond Counsel, under existing statutes, regulations, rulings and court decisions, and assuming continuing compliance by the Authority with certain requirements described herein, interest on the Series 2017 G Bonds is not includable in gross income for Federal income tax purposes pursuant to Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and is not treated as a preference item under Section 57 of the Code for purposes of calculating the Federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations. Under existing laws of the State of New Jersey, interest on the Series 2017 G Bonds and any gain on the sale thereof are not includible in gross income under the New Jersey Gross Income Tax Act. For a more complete discussion, see “TAX MATTERS” herein. $795,255,000* NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 G Dated: Date of Delivery Due: January 1, as shown on the inside front cover This Official Statement has been prepared to provide information relating to the issuance by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (the “Authority”) of its $795,255,000* aggregate principal amount of Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Series 2017 G (the “Series 2017 G Bonds”). The Bank of New York Mellon, Woodland Park, New Jersey, will serve as the Trustee, Paying Agent and Registrar for the Series 2017 G Bonds. The Series 2017 G Bonds will be issued in fully registered form without coupons, and, when issued, will be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”).
  • 3.5: Freight Movement

    3.5: Freight Movement

    3.5 Freight Movement 3.5 Freight Movement A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the characteristics of the existing rail freight services and railroad operators in the project area. Also addressed is the relationship between those services and Build Alternative long-term operations. The study area contains several rail freight lines and yards that play key roles in the movement of goods to and from the Port of New York and New Jersey, the largest port on the east coast, as well as in the movement of goods vital to businesses and residents in multiple states. However, no long-term freight movement impacts are anticipated with the Build Alternative, and no mitigation measures will be required. B. SERVICE TYPES The following freight rail services are offered in the project area: • Containerized or “inter-modal” consists primarily of containers or Example of Doublestack Train with Maritime truck trailers moved on rail cars. Containers Intermodal rail traffic is considered the fastest growing rail freight market, and is anticipated to grow in the region between 3.9 and 5.6 percent annually through 2030, based on the NJTPA Freight System Performance Study (see Table 3.5-1). • Carload traffic consists of products that are typically moved in boxcars, hopper cars, tank cars, and special lumber cars over a long distance by rail, and then either transported directly by rail or Example of Carload Rail Traffic shifted to truck for delivery to more local customers. The characteristics of these commodities (e.g., bulk, heavy or over- dimensional) make rail the preferred option for long-distance movement.
  • It's the Way to Go at the Peace Bridge

    It's the Way to Go at the Peace Bridge

    The coupon is not an invoice. If you Step 3 Read the customer guide New Jersey Highway Authority Garden State Parkway are a credit card customer, you don’t carefully. It explains how to use E-ZPass have to worry about an interruption and everything else that you should know New Jersey Turnpike Authority New Jersey Turnpike in your E-ZPass service because we about your account. Mount your tag and New York State Bridge Authority make it easy for you by automatically you’re on your way! Rip Van Winkle Bridge replenishing your account when it hits Kingston-Rhinecliff Bridge a low threshold level. Mid-Hudson Bridge Newburgh-Beacon Bridge For current E-ZPass customers: Where it is available. Bear Mountain Bridge If you already have an E-ZPass tag from E-ZPass is accepted anywhere there is an E-ZPass logo. New York State Thruway Authority It’s the Way another toll agency such as the NYS This network of roads aids in making it a truly Entire New York State Thruway including: seamless, regional transportation solution. With one New Rochelle Barrier Thruway, you may use your tag at the account, E-ZPass customers may use all toll facilities Yonkers Barrier Peace Bridge in an E-ZPass lane. Any where E-ZPass is accepted. Tappan Zee Bridge to Go at the NYS Thruway questions regarding use of Note: Motorists with existing E-ZPass accounts do not Spring Valley (commercial vehicle only) have to open a new or separate account for use in Harriman Barrier your tag must be directed to the NYS different states.
  • Pascack Valley Line Timetable

    Pascack Valley Line Timetable

    Station location and parking information can be found at njtransit.com know before you go fare options Accessible Station Bus Route Community Shuttle Light Rail Travel Information Before starting your trip, Purchasing Tickets Ticket Prices saving you time and money Ticket Vending Machines are available at all stations AB AmeriBus CR Coach USA visit njtransit.com for updated service information tickets your way how much depends on how frequently & how far (Rockland Coaches) EZ EZ Ride/Meadowlink TOR Transport of Rockland TZX Tappan Zee Express P LINE and access to DepartureVision which provides your We want to make your travel convenient AB11C, CR11A, CR45, TOR59, ASCACK train track and status. You can also sign up for free My and economical, so we offer lots of options: TOR91, TOR92, TOR94, TOR-Loop3, Weekend, Holiday TZX Transit alerts to receive up-to-the-moment delay infor- on-board trains Monthly Passes Unlimited trips within a calendar month; can be SPRING VALLEY LEY mation on your cell phone or web-enabled mobile device, avoid Train personnel can accept cash only (no VA L New York Hoboken purchased beginning at 5:00 p.m. on the 19th of the month prior and are valid and Special Service AB11C, CR11A, CR20, Nanuet or via email. To learn about other methods we use to commu- bills over $20). All tickets purchased on- the $ L 5 until noon on the first commuting weekday of the following month. TOR59, TOR93 LEY nicate with you, visit njtransit.com/InTheKnow. alley VA board are subject to an additional $5 surcharge one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip one-way one-way weekly monthly 10-trip Information Zones STATIONS reduced reduced Weekly Passes Unlimited trips from 12:01 a.m.
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS

    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS

    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
  • Harlem River Waterfront

    Harlem River Waterfront

    Amtrak and Henry Hudson Bridges over the Harlem River, Spuyten Duvyil HARLEM BRONX RIVER WATERFRONT MANHATTAN Linking a River’s Renaissance to its Upland Neighborhoods Brownfied Opportunity Area Pre-Nomination Study prepared for the Bronx Council for Environmental Quality, the New York State Department of State and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. February 2007 Acknowledgements Steering Committee Dart Westphal, Bronx Council for Environmental Quality – Project Chair Colleen Alderson, NYC Department of Parks and Recreation Karen Argenti, Bronx Council for Environmental Quality Justin Bloom, Esq., Brownfield Attorney Paula Luria Caplan, Office of the Bronx Borough President Maria Luisa Cipriano, Partnership for Parks (Bronx) Curtis Cravens, NYS Department of State Jane Jackson, New York Restoration Project Rita Kessler, Bronx Community Board 7 Paul S. Mankiewicz, PhD, New York City Soil & Water Conservation District Walter Matystik, M.E.,J.D., Manhattan College Matt Mason, NYC Department of City Planning David Mojica, Bronx Community Board 4 Xavier Rodriguez, Bronx Community Board 5 Brian Sahd, New York Restoration Project Joseph Sanchez, Partnership for Parks James Sciales, Empire State Rowing Association Basil B. Seggos, Riverkeeper Michael Seliger, PhD, Bronx Community College Jane Sokolow LMNOP, Metro Forest Council Shino Tanikawa, New York City Soil and Water Conservation District Brad Trebach, Bronx Community Board 8 Daniel Walsh, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Project Sponsor Bronx Council for Environmental Quality Municipal Partner Office of Bronx Borough President Adolfo Carrión, Jr. Fiscal Administrator Manhattan College Consultants Hilary Hinds Kitasei, Project Manager Karen Argenti, Community Participation Specialist Justin Bloom, Esq., Brownfield Attorney Paul S.
  • New Jersey Transit Corporation Rail Line 2014 Emergency Operations Annex

    New Jersey Transit Corporation Rail Line 2014 Emergency Operations Annex

    NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION RAIL LINE 2014 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX Version 3 RECORD OF CHANGES Changes listed below have been made to the New Jersey Transit Corporation Rail Line Emergency Operations Annex since its creation. CHANGE # DATE PART AFFECTED EFFECTIVE DATE POSTED BY 1 3/19/14 All – Date updated from “2013” to 3/19/14 SMN “2014” 2 3/19/14 All – Corrected page numbering 3/19/14 SMN ii NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION – RAIL LINE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX 2014 RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION The New Jersey Transit Corporation Rail Line Emergency Operations Annex has been distributed to the individuals listed below. DOCUMENT RECIPIENT SIGNATURE CONTROL # 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 iii NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION – RAIL LINE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX 2014 DOCUMENT RECIPIENT SIGNATURE CONTROL # 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 iv NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION – RAIL LINE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX 2014 NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION RAIL LINE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ANNEX Table of Contents RECORD OF CHANGES ................................................................................................................................... ii RECORD OF DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................................................... iii Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................