The "Tar Baby" Option: American Policy Toward Southern Rhodesia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The The "tar baby" option: American policy toward Southern Rhodesia http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.crp2b20030 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org The "tar baby" option: American policy toward Southern Rhodesia Author/Creator Lake, Anthony Publisher Columbia University Press (New York) Date 1976 Resource type Books Language English Subject Coverage (spatial) Zimbabwe, United States Coverage (temporal) 1965 - 1974 Source Northwestern University Libraries, Melville J. Herskovits Library of African Studies, 968.9104 L192t Rights By kind permission of Anthony Lake and Columbia University Press. Description This study of U.S. policy toward white Rhodesia, based on extensive interviews with U.S. officials, covers the initial U.S. reaction to the Rhodesian Unilateral Declaration of Independence, the shift to relaxation of sanctions by the Nixon administration, and the open violation of United Nations sanctions mandated by Congress in the Byrd Amendment in 1971. It also covers subsequent efforts by activist groups and members of congress to repeal the Byrd Amendment. Format extent 344 pages (length/size) http://www.aluka.org/action/showMetadata?doi=10.5555/AL.SFF.DOCUMENT.crp2b20030 http://www.aluka.org Northwestern University LIBRARY Evanston, Illinois The "Tar Baby" Option American Policy Toward Southern Rhodesia I The "Tar Baby" Option American Policy Toward Southern Rhodesia ANTHONY LAKE (.. A Study from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace New York Columbia University Press 1976 Afri Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Lake, Anthony. The "tar baby" option. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. United States-Foreign relations-Rhodesia, Southern. 2. Rhodesia, Southern-Foreign relationsUnited States. 3. United States- Foreign economic relations-Rhodesia, Southern. 4. Rhodesia, SouthernForeign economic relations-United States. 5. Rhodesia, Southern-Politics and government-1966- I. Title. E183.8.R5L34 327.73'0689'1 76-2455 ISBN 0-231-04066-0 ISBN 0-231-04067-9 pbk. Columbia University Press New York Guildford, Surrey Copyright © 1973, 1976 by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Printed in the United States of America Contents Foreword by Thomas L. Hughes vii Preface xi 1 Southern Rhodesia: Two Nations in Search of a State 1 2 Dilemmas and Compromises: The International Responses to UDI 35 3 American Policy, 1965-1968: The Necessity for Compromise! 60 4 "Tar Baby": The Shift in Approach, 1969-70 123 5 Business As Usual: Assorted Activities Violating Sanctions 158 6TheByrdAmendment 198 7 Irony in Chrome: The Consequences of the Byrd Amendment 239 8 To Repeal a Policy 270 Appendix 1 United Nations Resolutions on Rhodesia 287 Appendix 2 Executive Order 11322 295 Appendix 3 Executive Order 11419 298 Bibliographical Notes 301 Index 307 Foreword Perhaps it is true that the United States has never really had an Africa policy. But it is also true that if you have seen one Africa policy, you have not seen them all. As Anthony Lake makes clear in his book, however uninspiring or humdrum our Africa policy may have been before 1969, at least it was not conspicuously wrongheaded, immoral, or illegal. How we went about squandering our limited assets and achieving all three of these latter reputations in recent years in our handling of Southern Rhodesia issues is the subject of this insightful account. President Nixon's decision to choose the "Tar Baby" option was explicitly based on the now obvious miscalculation that when it came to control of the brittle societies of southern Africa the "whites are here to stay." That assumption underlay the White House's decision to stay on too, out in front, with the decrepit Portuguese colonial regime right through the last week of Portugal's 500-year plan for Africa. Only after the old regime in Lisbon was exiled, and Portuguese withdrawal from Mozambique and Angola was underway, did Washington go through its ineffectual last-minute motions to accuse Congress of "losing" Angola by cutting off disparate, small-scale, covert funding. Meanwhile America's new Africa policy was already further discredited by appearing to be publicly guilty by association with a white South African military adventure inside Angola. The recent miserable Angolan side of the Tar Baby story was a sequel to a longer, sadder, but equally tawdry account of viii Foreword how Washington turned away from its moderate Rhodesian policy of the 1960s. The latter, which had uneasily but not disgracefully combined both the pro- African and pro-British wings of an anti-Salisbury posture, was cast aside in favor of deliberate moves toward "communication" with the white rebel regime. This was consistent with expanded contacts with white governments, relaxed arms sales policies toward Lisbon and Pretoria, benign neglect at the UN, the authorized violation of sanctions, and the temptations toward "business as usual" with the white regimes. The Tar Baby tilt was recommended by the Nixon NSC staff, approved by Dr. Kissinger, and secretly adopted by the President in the winter of 1969-70. As described by Anthony Lake, it resulted over the next five years in a striking display of four kinds of interacting politics on Southern Rhodesian issues: (1) regular private meetings between the NSC Africa staffer and the Washington representative of the racist Rhodesian regime; (2) unremitting bureaucratic politics inside the Executive Branch, usually pitting a skeptical State Department against an assertive White House; (3) persistent congressional politics against a divided Executive Branch which allowed the pro-Byrd Amendment pressures to succeed in officially positioning the United States before the world in violation of UN sanctions and international law; and (4) a dramatic handsacross-the-sea vignette of international partisan politics as the then-leader of the British Opposition attempted to lobby against the British government inside the White House on the symbolic issue of withdrawing the American consulate in Southern Rhodesia in the spring of 1970. All of these elements, and more, are detailed by Anthony Lake in this fascinating study of America's recent Southern Rhodesian policy. The book contains much new material. In the chapters on sanctions, Lake's account shows how the United States Executive and Congress alike succumbed to short-sighted lobbying. In the process we moved from one of the two best records on the enforcement of sanctions against Foreword ix Southern Rhodesia to become one of only three members of the United Nations (along with Portugal and South Africa) which, as a matter of official policy, allowed the import of Rhodesian goods in violation of international law. The decision to violate sanctions was, at first glance, limited to a relatively small country of little importance to the United States. But the decision has far-reaching implications. The most dire and immeasurable effect is the possibility that United States actions may have contributed to the continued suppression of the 95 percent by the 5 percent-of five million African blacks by 250,000 whites. That prospect does not bode well for U.S. relations with a future black Rhodesian government. It has right along been a major source of friction between the United States and independent African countries. But beyond that, the United States action has important implications for the remainder of southern Africa. During 1975, even South Africa recognized that failure to resolve the Rhodesian problem peacefully at an early date reduced the chances of a peaceful solution to black/white confrontations over Namibia and South Africa. Finally, there is the adverse effect on the development and strength of the United Nations and of respect for international law. For the United States, respect for both was obviously secondary when it came to sanctions, but Washington thereby may well have contributed to the further weakening of institutions which it may find useful if not essential in the future. How the United States decides and acts when faced with a choice between narrow short-term business and other pressures and broader considerations of the national interest has been a major issue in the debate about what is wrong with American foreign policy and, indeed, about what ails the United States in its 200th year. A number of Endowment publications from our Humanitarian Studies Program have also examined these policy questions with the objective of contributing to a better understanding of the issues involved. The issues themselves are seldom seen in better focus than in this x Foreword account from our Special Rhodesia Project about the combined White House- congressional willingness to tilt toward this pariah state in southern Africa. Anthony Lake directed the Special Rhodesia Project for the Endowment during 1972-74. A Foreign Service Officer from 1962 to 1970, he served in Vietnam, in the Department of State, and, in 1969-70, as Special Assistant to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. Currently, Anthony Lake is Executive Director of International Voluntary Services, a private multinational development organization.
Recommended publications
  • Archives Not to Be Removed
    THE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE 0 F INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS THE S.A. INSTITUTE OF INUEiiATlONAL AFFAIRS ARCHIVES NOT TO BE REMOVED RHODESIA - MAY. 1968 by PROFESSOR B. COCKRAM WARNING This talk was given at r> private meeting and is circulated for the information of members of the Institute only. Statements made in the talk must not be linked publicly with the speaker's name, nor with the name of the Institute. Furthermore, the Institute is pre- cluded by its Constitution from expressing any opinions. The opinions expressed in this talk are, therefore, solely the responsibility of the speaker. JAN SMUTS HOUSE UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND 6th MAY 1968 RHODESIA - MAY 1968 It is nine months since I attempted to make any assessment of the situation in Rhodesia. In the previous eighteen I had spoken at least six times on UDI and the problems which it had created for Rhodesia, Zambia, Britain and South Africa. No final solutions have been reached to any of these problems; but our news- papers and newscasts have been filled with the infiltration of terrorists, counter-terrorist action, support respectively for terrorists from Zambia and for counter-terrorists from South Africa, the succession of British ministers and ex-ministers visiting Salisbury, visits by Mr Smith to South Africa, and possible visits by Mr Smith to Britain, the U.S.A. and the U.N. , calls for economic, political and military action, and what have you. Row both within and without Rhodesia major decisions are going to be taken. A. Mr Wilson and Mr Smith At the end of my August talk I listed my own conclus- ions.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2018-071) May 8, 2018 The Honorable Donald F. McGahn, II Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. McGahn: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Clinton Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 46,173 pages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 1,741 pages restricted in whole or in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 44,432 pages. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is August 2, 2018, unless the former or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2208(b)-(d). Please let us know if you are able to complete your review before the expiration of the 60 working day period. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a)(1)(B), we will make this notice available to the public on the NARA website.
    [Show full text]
  • MPHATSO MOSES KAUFULU (Bsoc.Sc., UNIMA; Bsoc.Sc
    USING A DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL APPROACH TO ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP A THEORETICAL SOCIOLOGY OF MALAWI BY MPHATSO MOSES KAUFULU (BSoc.Sc., UNIMA; BSoc.Sc. Hons., UKZN) A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SOCIAL SCIENCE BY FULL DISSERTATION IN SOCIOLOGY IN THE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE OF THE COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, PMB 2013 Declaration I, Mphatso Moses Kaufulu, declare that 1. The research reported in this thesis, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research. 2. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university. 3. This thesis does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons. 4. This thesis does not contain other persons' writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a. Their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced b. Where their exact words have been used, then their writing has been placed in italics and inside quotation marks, and referenced. 5. This thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the thesis and in the References sections. _______________________________ _______________________________ Name of Candidate Name of Supervisor _______________________________ _______________________________ Signature Signature _______________________________ _______________________________ Date Date i Dedication To my late father and mother, Dr and Mrs Kaufulu. To my sister, Mrs Chisomo Kaufulu-Kumwenda, and her newly born son Jedidiah Joshua (JJ).
    [Show full text]
  • Read Book Encyclopedia of Modern Dictators : from Napoleon to The
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF MODERN DICTATORS : FROM NAPOLEON TO THE PRESENT PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Frank J. Coppa | 344 pages | 04 Apr 2006 | Peter Lang Publishing Inc | 9780820450100 | English | New York, United States Encyclopedia of Modern Dictators : From Napoleon to the Present PDF Book Chiang now continued to reunify China. As Supreme Leader , held ultimate and uncontested authority over all government matters under the principle of Guardianship. Jean-Jacques Dessalines. Invasion of Belgium. Hold false elections. Abacha Sani Article Contents. More than , people were arrested only during the first three years. Created the extra-constitutional Special Clerical Court system in , accountable only to the Supreme Leader and used principally for suppression of political dissent. Kenneth Sani Abacha. In terms of territory, Metternich gladly relinquished claims to the old Austrian Netherlands and the various Habsburg possessions in Germany for a consolidated monarchy at the centre of Europe. Opposition groups have been outlawed particularly Islamic ones , human rights activists have been thrown in prison and hundreds of protester killed during crackdowns. Translated by de Bellaigue, Sheila; Bridge, Roy. Europe Since An Encyclopedia. Chairman of the Council of State ; President of Chad He succeeded until , when in a violent coup, he expelled the communists from the KMT and quashed the Chinese labor unions they had created. Volume 3. Volume II: E - L. Jailed Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale Abiola , the presumed winner of the annulled presidential election; presided over execution of activist Ken Saro-Wiwa. Encyclopedia of Modern Dictators : From Napoleon to the Present Writer Zhang Jinghui was similarly handed over to China in , dying in prison in , while Demchugdongrub fled to Mongolia before being handed to the Chinese and released 13 years later.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking
    AP PHOTO/CHARLES DHARAPAK PHOTO/CHARLES AP Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 6 Findings 14 First-order questions for the next president 17 Best practices to consider 26 Policymaking versus oversight versus crisis management 36 Meetings, meetings, and more meetings 61 Internal NSC staff management 72 Appendix A 73 About the authors 74 Endnotes Introduction and summary Most modern presidents have found that the transition from campaigning to governing presents a unique set of challenges, especially regarding their newfound national security responsibilities. Regardless of their party affiliation or preferred diplomatic priorities, presidents have invariably come to appreciate that they can- not afford to make foreign policy decisions in the same manner as they did when they were a candidate. The requirements of managing an enormous and complex national security bureau- cracy reward careful deliberation and strategic consistency, while sharply punishing the kind of policy shifts that are more common on the campaign trail. Statements by the president are taken far more seriously abroad than are promises by a candidate, by both allies and adversaries alike. And while policy mistakes made before entering office can damage a candidate’s personal political prospects, a serious misstep made once in office can put the country itself at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Macpherson
    © University of the West of England Do not reproduce or redistribute in part or whole without seeking prior permission from the Rhodesian Forces oral history project coordinators at UWE Ian MacPherson Born in Calcutta in 1945. Went to school in the UK. His family left India for the UK in 1962. Ian trained in Bristol and hoped to go to South Africa but ended up travelling to Rhodesia in 1969. Volunteered for the Police Reserve in 1971/2. Left Rhodesia for the UK(?) in 1977. This is Dr Sue Onslow talking to Mr Ian MacPherson in Sunningdale on Friday 5th June 2009. Ian, thank you very much indeed for agreeing to talk to me about this Rhodesia project. I wonder if you could begin by saying, please, where were you born? I was born in Calcutta on 12 November 1945. And how did your parents come to be in India? My mother’s grandparents were in India in the 19th century and my father went out to India in 1932. They were married in ’45. When did they leave India? 1962 So they stayed there after Partition? Yes Your childhood and upbringing then were in India? A lot of it. I was educated over here but, like a lot of those kids in those days, I used to fly backwards and forwards for my holidays. When did you come back to England for your schooling? Well, I was actually at school in England. I started off at prep school when I was six up in Scotland. Boarding? Yes, and then I went out for my holidays or I stayed with my grandmother in Dundee or my Aunties down in Dunfermline.
    [Show full text]
  • THE UNITED STATES and SOUTH AFRICA in the NIXON YEARS by Eric J. Morgan This Thesis Examines Relat
    ABSTRACT THE SIN OF OMISSION: THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA IN THE NIXON YEARS by Eric J. Morgan This thesis examines relations between the United States and South Africa during Richard Nixon’s first presidential administration. While South Africa was not crucial to Nixon’s foreign policy, the racially-divided nation offered the United States a stabile economic partner and ally against communism on the otherwise chaotic post-colonial African continent. Nixon strengthened relations with the white minority government by quietly lifting sanctions, increasing economic and cultural ties, and improving communications between Washington and Pretoria. However, while Nixon’s policy was shortsighted and hypocritical, the Afrikaner government remained suspicious, believing that the Nixon administration continued to interfere in South Africa’s domestic affairs despite its new policy relaxations. The Nixon administration concluded that change in South Africa could only be achieved through the Afrikaner government, and therefore ignored black South Africans. Nixon’s indifference strengthened apartheid and hindered liberation efforts, helping to delay black South African freedom for nearly two decades beyond his presidency. THE SIN OF OMMISSION: THE UNITED STATES AND SOUTH AFRICA IN THE NIXON YEARS A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History by Eric J. Morgan Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2003 Advisor __________________________________ (Dr. Jeffrey P. Kimball) Reader ___________________________________ (Dr. Allan M. Winkler) Reader ___________________________________ (Dr. Osaak Olumwullah) TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . iii Prologue The Wonderful Tar Baby Story . 1 Chapter One The Unmovable Monolith . 3 Chapter Two Foresight and Folly .
    [Show full text]
  • Technical and Vocational Skills Development in the Informal Sector (TVSD)
    68 Technical and Vocational Skills Development in the dvv international Informal Sector Contributions to the 4th Bonn Conference on Adult Education and Development (BoCAED), October 2013 Karen Langer (ed.) Informal Sector International Perspectives in Adult Education Technical and Vocational Skills Development in the Sponsored by International Perspectives in Adult Education – IPE 68 The reports, studies and materials published in this series aim to further the develop- ment of theory and practice in the work of the Volkshochschulen (VHS) as it relates to international aspects of Adult Education – and vice versa. We hope that by provid- ing access to information and a channel for communication, the series will serve to increase knowledge, deepen insights and improve cooperation in Adult Education at an international level. Publisher: dvv international, Anton Markmiller Editor: Karen Langer Managing Editor: Ruth Sarrazin Production: Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei Opinions expressed in papers published under the names of individual authors do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher and editors. This publication, or parts of it, may be reproduced provided the source is duly cited. The publisher asks to be furnished with copies of any such reproductions. Bibliographic information published by Die Deutsche Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at <http://dnb.ddb.de> ISBN Nummer: 978-3-942755-11-5 © 2013 dvv international dvv international Institut für Internationale Zusammenarbeit des Deutschen Volkshochschul-Verbandes Obere Wilhelmstraße 32 · 53225 Bonn Federal Republic of Germany Tel.: +49/228-97569-0 · Fax: +49/228-97569-55 [email protected] · www.dvv-international.de Our publications are printed on 100% chlorine-free bleached recycled paper.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Birmingham Why American Grand Strategy Has Not
    University of Birmingham Why American Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Porter, Patrick DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00311 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Porter, P 2018, 'Why American Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit and the U.S. Foreign Policy Establishment', International Security, vol. 42, no. 4, 1, pp. 9-46. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00311 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Article published in International Security on 04/05/2018 DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00311 Why America's Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit, and the U.S. Foreign Policy Establishment, Patrick Porter, International Security 2018 42:04, 9-46 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1964-65
    1964-65 Content Jan 01, 1964 CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. India's Policy of Non-alignment 1-6 II. United Nations and International Conferences 7-19 III. Disarmament 20-23 IV. India's Neighbours 24-42 V. States in Special Treaty Relations with India 43-46 VI. South East Asia 47-51 VII. East Asia 52-55 VIII. West Asia and North Africa 66-57 IX. Africa south of the Sahara 58-60 X. Eastern and Western Europe 61-73 XI. The Americas 74-78 XII. External Publicity 79-83 XIII. Technical and Economic Co-operation 84-87 XIV. Consular and Passport Services 88-95 XV. Organisation and Administration 96-104 (i) (ii) PAGE Appendix I. Declaration of Conference of Non-aligned Countries 105-122 Appendix II. International Organisations of which India is a member 123-126 Appendix III. Commonwealth Prime Ministers' Final Com- munique, July 1994 127-134 Appendix IV. Indo-Ceylon Agreement 135-136 Appendix V. Distinguished visitors from abroad 137-141 Appendix VI. Visits of Indian Dignitaries to foreign countries 142-143 Appendix VII. Soviet-Indian Joint Communique 144-147 Appendix VIII. Technical Co-operation 148-150 Appendix IX. Economic Collaboration 151-152 Appendix X. Foreign Diplomatic Missions in India 153-154 Appendix XI. Foreign Consular Offices in India 155-157 Appendix XII. Indian Missions Abroad 158-164 INDIA Jan 01, 1964 INDIA'S POLICY OF NON-ALIGNMENT CHAPTER I INDIA'S POLICY OF NON-ALIGNMENT India, ever since her independence, has consistently followed in her foreign relations a policy of non-alignment with the opposing power blocs.
    [Show full text]