Heads of State*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heads of State* 5102_e15_p1-10.qxd 1/27/10 3:24 PM Page 1 Heads of State* Argentina 1862 Bartolomé Mitre 1955 Eduardo Lonardi, September 23– 1868 Domingo F. Sarmiento November 13 1874 Nicolás Avellaneda Pedro Eugenio Aramburu, 1880 Julio Argentino Roca November 13–May 1, 1958 1886 Miguel Juárez Celman 1958 Arturo Frondizi 1890 Carlos Pellegrini 1962 José María Guido 1963 Arturo Illia 1892 Luís Sáenz Peña 1966 Juan Carlos Onganía 1895 José E. Uriburu 1970 Roberto Marcelo Levingston 1898 Julio Argentino Roca 1971 Alejandro A. Lanusse 1904 Manuel Quintana 1973 Héctor Cámpora, May 27–July 13 1906 José Figueroa Alcorta Raúl Alberto Lastiri, July 13– 1910 Roque Sáenz Peña October 12 1914 Victorino de la Plaza Juan Domingo Perón, 1916 Hipólito Yrigoyen October 12–July 1, 1974 1922 Marcelo Torcuato 1974 María Estela (Isabel) Martínez de de Alvear Perón 1928 Hipólito Yrigoyen 1976 Jorge Rafael Videla 1930 José Félix Uriburu 1981 Roberto Viola, March 29– December 22 1932 Augustín P. Justo Leopoldo Fortunato Galtieri, 1938 Roberto M. Ortiz December 22–June 17, 1982 1940 Ramón S. Castillo 1982 Reynaldo Benito Antonio Bignone 1943 Arturo Rawson, June 5–7 1983 Raúl Alfonsín Foulkes Pedro P. Ramírez, June 7– 1989 Carlos Saúl Menem March 9, 1944 1999 Fernando de la Rúa 1944 Edelmiro J. Farrell 2003 Néstor Kirchner 1946 Juan Domingo Perón 2007 Cristína Fernández de Kirchner Bolivia 1864 Mariano Melgarejo 1888 Aniceto Arce 1871 Agustín Morales 1892 Mariano Baptista 1872 Tomás Frías Ametller 1896 Severo Fernández 1873 Adolfo Ballivián 1899 Serapio Reyes Ortiz 1874 Tomás Frías Ametller (April 12–October 25) 1876 Hilarión Daza 1899 José Manuel Pando 1880 Narciso Campero 1904 Ismael Montes 1884 Gregorio Pacheco 1909 Eliodoro Villazón *These listings include only those countries covered in the book. 1 5102_e15_p1-10.qxd 1/27/10 3:24 PM Page 2 2 Heads of State 1913 Ismael Montes 1969 Luis Adolfo Siles Salinas 1917 José Gutiérrez (April 27–September 26) 1920 Bautista Saavedra 1969 Alfredo Ovando Candía 1925 Felipe S. Guzmán 1970 Juan José Torres 1926 Hernando Siles Reyes 1971 Hugo Banzer 1930 Carlos Blanco Galindo 1978 Juan Pereda 1931 Daniel Salamanca Urey (July 21–November 24) 1934 José Luis Tejada Sorzano 1978 David Padilla 1936 David Toro 1979 Wálter Guevara 1937 Germán Busch (August 8–November 1) 1939 Carlos Quintanilla 1979 Lydia Gueiler Tejada 1940 Enrique Peñaranda 1980 Luis García Meza Tejada 1943 Gualberto Villarroel López 1981 Celso Torrelio 1946 Tomás Monje 1982 Guido Vildoso (July 21–October 10) 1947 Enrique Hertzog 1982 Hernán Siles Suazo 1949 Mamerto Urriolagoitia 1985 Víctor Paz Estenssoro 1951 Hugo Ballivián 1989 Jaime Paz Zamora 1952 Víctor Paz Estenssoro 1993 Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada 1956 Hernán Siles Suazo 1997 Hugo Banzer 1960 Víctor Paz Estenssoro 2002 Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada 1964 René Barrientos + Alfredo Ovando 2003 Carlos Mesa Candía 2005 Eduardo Rodríguez 1966 René Barrientos 2006 Evo Morales Brazil 1831 Dom Pedro II 1956 Juscelino Kubitschek 1889 Deodoro da Fonseca 1961 Jânio Quadros, January 31– 1891 Floriano Peixoto August 25 1894 Prudente de Moraise e Barros Ranieri Mazzilli, August 25– 1898 Manuel Ferraz de Campos Sales September 8 1902 Francisco de Paula Rodrigues Alves João Goulart, September 8– 1906 Afonso Augusto Moreira Pena April 2, 1964 1909 Nilo Peçanha 1964 Ramieri Mazzilli, April 2–15 1910 Hermes da Fonseca Humberto de Alencar Castello 1914 Wenceslau Brás Pereira Gomes Branco, April 15–March 15, 1918 Delfim Moreira da Costa Ribeiro 1967 1919 Epitácio da Silva Pessòa 1967 Artur da Costa e Silva 1922 Arthur da Silva Bernardes 1969 Augusto Hamann Rademaker 1926 Washington Luís Pereira de Sousa Gruenewald, August 31– 1930 Júlio Prestes, October 24– October 25 November 4 Emílio Garrastazu Medici, Getúlio Dornelles Vargas, October 30–March 15, November 4–October 31, 1945 1974 1945 José Linhares 1974 Ernesto Geisel 1946 Eurico Gaspar Dutra 1979 João Baptista Figueiredo 1951 Getúlio Vargas 1985 José Sarney 1954 João Café Filho 1990 Fernando Collor de Mello 1955 Carlos Luz, November 8–11 1992 Itamar Franco Nereu Ramos, November 11– 1995 Fernando Henrique Cardoso January 31, 1956 2003 Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva Chile 1876 Aníbal Pinto 1896 Federico Errázuriz 1881 Domingo Santa María 1901 Germán Riesco Errázuriz 1886 José Manuel Balmaceda 1905 Rafael Rayas 1891 Jorge Montt 1906 Pedro Montt 5102_e15_p1-10.qxd 1/27/10 3:24 PM Page 3 Heads of State 3 1910 Elías Fernández Albano, 1932 Arturo Puga, June 4–12 August 16–September 6 Marmaduke Grove, June 12–16 Emiliano Figueroa, September 6– Carlos Dávila Espinoza, June 17– September 18, 1911 September 13 1911 Ramón Barros Luco Bartolomé Blanche Espejo, 1915 Juan Luís Sanfuentes September 13–October 2 1920 Luis Barros Borgoño, June 25– Abraham Oyanedel, October 2– December 23 December 24 Arturo Alessandri Palma, Arturo Alessandri Palma, December 23–September December 24–December 24, 1938 8, 1924 1938 Pedro Aguirre Cerda 1924 Luis Altamirano 1941 Geronimo Méndez Arancibia 1925 Carlos Ibañez del Campo, 1942 Juan Antonio Ríos Morales January 23–March 21 1946 Alfredo Duhalde Vázquez, Arturo Alessandri Palma, June 27–October 17 March 21–October 1 Juan A. Irabarren, October 17– Luis Barros Borgoño, October 1– November 3 December Gabriel González Videla, Emiliano Figueroa Larraín, November 3–November 3, 1952 December–May 4, 1927 1952 Carlos Ibáñez del Campo 1927 Carlos Ibáñez del Campo 1958 Jorge Alessandri Rodríguez 1931 Pedro Opazo Letelier, July 26–27 1964 Educardo Frei Montalva Juan Esteban Montero Rodríguez, 1970 Salvador Allende Gossens July 27–August 18 1973 Augusto Pinochet Ugarte Manuel Trucco Franzani, 1990 Patricio Aylwin August 18–November 15 1994 Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle Juan Esteban Montero Rodríguez, 2000 Ricardo Lagos Escobar November 15–June 4, 1932 2006 Michelle Bachelet Colombia 1819 Simón Bolívar 1898 Manuel Antonio Sanclemente 1830 Joaquín Mosquera 1900 José Manuel Marroquín Rafael Urdaneta 1904 Rafael Reyes 1831 Domingo Caicedo 1909 Jorge Holguín José María Obando (temporary until July 1909) José Ignacio Márquez Ramón González Valencia 1832 Francisco de Paula Santander 1910 Carlos Emilio Restrepo 1837 José Ignacio Márquez 1914 José Vicente Concha 1841 Pedro Alcántara Herrán 1918 Marco Fidel Suárez 1845 Tomás Cipriano de Mosquera 1921 Jorge Holguín 1849 José Hilario López 1922 Pedro Nel Ospina 1853 José María Obando 1926 Miguel Abadía Méndez 1854 José de Obaldía 1930 Enrique Olaya Herrera 1855 Manuel María Mallarino 1934 Alfonso López Pumarejo 1857 Mariano Ospina Rodríguez 1938 Eduardo Santos 1861 Tomás Cipriano de Mosquera 1942 Alfonso López Pumarejo 1864 Manuel Murillo Toro 1945 Alberto Lleras Camargo 1866 Tomás Cipriano de Mosquera 1946 Mariano Ospina Pérez 1867 Santos Acosta 1950 Laureano Gómez 1868 Santos Gutiérrez 1951 Roberto Udarneta Arbelaez 1870 Eustorgio Salgar 1953 Gustavo Rojas Pinilla 1872 Manuel Morillo Toro 1874 Santiago Pérez 1957 Military Junta 1876 Aquileo Parra 1958 Alberto Lleras Camargo 1878 Julián Trujillo 1962 Guillermo León Valencia 1880 Rafael Núñez 1966 Carlos Lleras Restrepo 1882 Francisco J. Zaldúa 1970 Misael Pastrana Borrero 1884 Rafael Núñez 1974 Alfonso López Michelsen 1894 Miguel Antonio Caro 1978 Julio César Turbay Ayala 5102_e15_p1-10.qxd 1/27/10 3:24 PM Page 4 4 Heads of State 1982 Belisario Betancur 1994 Ernesto Samper Pizano 1986 Virgilio Barco Vargas 1998 Andrés Pastrana Arango 1990 César Gaviria Trujillo 2002 Álvaro Uribe Vélez Costa Rica 1876 Tomás Guardia 1944 Teodoro Picardo Michalski 1882 Próspero Fernández 1948 Santos León Herrera, April 19– 1885 Bernardo Soto y Alfaro May 8 1890 José Joaquín Rodríguez José Figueres Ferrer, May 8– 1894 Rafael Iglesias Castro November 8, 1949 1902 Ascensión Esquivel Ibarra 1949 Otilio Ulate Blanco 1906 Cleto González Víquez 1952 Alberto Oreamuno Flores 1910 Ricardo Jimínez Oreamuno 1953 José Figueres Ferrer 1914 Alfredo González Flores 1958 Mario Echandi Jiménez 1962 Francisco José Orlich 1917 Federico Tinoco Granados 1966 José Joaquín Trejos Fernández 1919 Julio Acosta García, May 7– 1970 José Figueres Ferrer August 13 1974 Daniel Oduber Juan Bautista Quirós, August 13– 1978 Rodrigo Carazo May 8, 1920 1982 Luis Alberto Monge Alvarez 1920 Julio Acosta García 1986 Oscar Arias Sánchez 1924 Ricardo Jiménez Oreamuno 1990 Rafael Angel Calderón 1928 Cleto González Víquez 1994 José María Figueres 1932 Ricardo Jiménez Oreamuno 1998 Miguel Angel Rodríguez Echeverría 1936 León Cortés Castro 2002 Abel Pacheco de la Espriella 1940 Rafael Angel Calderón Guardia 2006 Oscar Arias Sánchez Cuba 1899 John R. Brooke, January 1– Manuel Márquez Sterling, December 23 (U.S.O.)* January 18 Leonard Wood, December 23– Carlos Mendieta Montefur, May 20, 1902 (U.S.O.) January 18–December 11, 1935 1902 Tomás Estrada Palma 1935 José A. Barnet y Vinageras 1906 William Howard Taft, 1936 Miguel Mariano Gómez Arias, September 29–October 13 May 20–December 24 (U.S.O.) Federico Laredo Bru, Charles Edward Magoon, December 24–October October 13–January 28, 1909 10, 1940 (U.S.O.) 1940 Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar 1909 José Miguel Gómez 1944 Ramón Grau San Martín 1913 Mario García Menocal 1921 Alfredo Zayas 1948 Carlos Prío Socarrás 1925 Gerardo Machado Morales 1952 Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar 1933 Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, 1959 Manuel Urrutia Lleo, January 2– August 12–September 5 July 17 [Fidel Castro Ruz de Council of Five, September 5– facto head from here on] September 10 Osvaldo Dorticós Torrado, July 17– Ramón Grau San Martín, December 3, 1976 September 10–January 15, 1934 1976 Fidel Castro Ruz 1934 Carlos Hevía, January 15–18
Recommended publications
  • Brett J. Kyle Dissertation
    RECYCLING DICTATORS: EX-AUTHORITARIANS IN NEW DEMOCRACIES by Brett J. Kyle A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2013 Date of final oral examination: 08/26/13 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Christina Ewig, Associate Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, Political Science David Canon, Professor, Political Science Noam Lupu, Assistant Professor, Political Science Henry Dietz, Professor, Government © Copyright by Brett J. Kyle 2013 All Rights Reserved i To my parents, Linda Davis Kyle and J. Richard Kyle ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the support of my family, friends, and colleagues. In particular, I would like to thank my co-chairs, Christina Ewig and Scott Straus, for their guidance, feedback, and questions in the development and writing process; and my committee members—David Canon, Noam Lupu, and Henry Dietz—for their insights and attention to the project. I would also like to thank Leigh Payne for her direction and consistent interest in the dissertation. In addition, Andy Reiter has been a crucial guide throughout the process. The research for this project received financial support from the UW-Madison Latin American Caribbean and Iberian Studies Tinker/Nave Grant, the Vilas Travel Grant, and the Department of Political Science’s Summer Research Initiative. Finally, I would like to thank my parents, Linda Davis Kyle and Richard Kyle, and my brother, Brock Kyle, for always being there for me and for always seeing the value of my efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California San Diego
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO Infrastructure, state formation, and social change in Bolivia at the start of the twentieth century. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Nancy Elizabeth Egan Committee in charge: Professor Christine Hunefeldt, Chair Professor Michael Monteon, Co-Chair Professor Everard Meade Professor Nancy Postero Professor Eric Van Young 2019 Copyright Nancy Elizabeth Egan, 2019 All rights reserved. SIGNATURE PAGE The Dissertation of Nancy Elizabeth Egan is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair ___________________________________________________________ Chair University of California San Diego 2019 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ............................................................................................................ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................... ix LIST
    [Show full text]
  • Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns
    Order Code RL32294 Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns Updated January 25, 2008 Maureen Taft-Morales Specialist in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Clare Ribando Seelke Analyst in Latin American Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Haiti: Developments and U.S. Policy Since 1991 and Current Congressional Concerns Summary Following the first free and fair elections in Haiti’s history, Jean-Bertrand Aristide first became Haitian President in February 1991. He was overthrown by a military coup in September 1991. For over three years, the military regime resisted international demands that Aristide be restored to office. In September 1994, after a U.S. military intervention had been launched, the military regime agreed to Aristide’s return, the immediate, unopposed entry of U.S. troops, and the resignation of its leadership. President Aristide returned to Haiti in October 1994 under the protection of some 20,000 U.S. troops, and disbanded the Haitian army. U.S. aid helped train a civilian police force. Subsequently, critics charged Aristide with politicizing that force and engaging in corrupt practices. Elections held under Aristide and his successor, René Préval (1996-2000), including the one in which Aristide was reelected in 2000, were marred by alleged irregularities, low voter turnout, and opposition boycotts. Efforts to negotiate a resolution to the electoral dispute frustrated the international community for years. Tension and violence continued throughout Aristide’s second term, culminating in his departure from office in February 2004, after the opposition repeatedly refused to negotiate a political solution and armed groups took control of half the country.
    [Show full text]
  • BBREVE CRONOLOGÍA DE GOLPES DE ESTADO EN EL SIGLO XX Y XXI Equipo Conceptos Y Fenómenos Fundamentales De Nuestro Tiempo
    CONCEPTOS Y FENÓMENOS FUNDAMENTALES DE NUESTRO TIEMPO UNAM UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIONES SOCIALES BBREVE CRONOLOGÍA DE GOLPES DE ESTADO EN EL SIGLO XX Y XXI Equipo Conceptos y Fenómenos Fundamentales de Nuestro Tiempo Noviembre 2019 1 CRONOLOGÍA DE GOLPES DE ESTADO EN EL SIGLO XX Y XXI1 Por Equipo de Conceptos y Fenómenos Fundamentales de Nuestro Tiempo2 Siglo XX: 1908: golpe de Estado en Venezuela. Juan Vicente Gómez derroca a Cipriano Castro. 1911: golpe de Estado cívico-militar en México. Francisco I. Madero y sus fuerzas revolucionarias derrocan al ejército porfirista y obligan a la renuncia de Porfirio Díaz. 1913: golpe de Estado de Victoriano Huerta en México. 1913: golpe de Estado de los Jóvenes Turcos en el Imperio Otomano. 1914: golpe militar en Perú. Óscar R. Benavides derroca a Guillermo Billinghurst. 1917: golpe militar en Costa Rica. Federico Tinoco Granados derroca a Alfredo González Flores. 1917: En Rusia se provocan varios golpes de Estado. En febrero contra los zares, que triunfa. En julio por los bolcheviques contra el gobierno provisional, que fracasa. En agosto por el general Kornilov, que fracasa y en octubre Lenin derriba al gobierno provisional de Kerensky. 1919: golpe de Estado en Perú. Augusto Leguía derroca a José Pardo y Barreda. 1923: fallido golpe de Estado de Adolf Hitler en Alemania. 1923: golpe de Estado de Primo de Rivera en España, el 13 de septiembre. 1924: golpe de Estado en Chile. Se instala una junta de gobierno presidida por Luis Altamirano, que disuelve el Congreso Nacional. 1925: golpe de Estado en Chile, que derrocó a la junta de gobierno presidida por Luis Altamirano.
    [Show full text]
  • Vicepresidentes De La República Del Ecuador
    VICEPRESIDENTES DE LA REPÚBLICA DEL ECUADOR PERÍODO VICEPRESIDENTE PRESIDENTE PERIODO PRESIDENCIAL OBSERVACIONES VICEPRESIDENCIAL Vicepresidente designado el 11 de Diciembre 11, 2018 - En el cargo diciembre de 2018 por la Asamblea Nacional con 94 votos a favor. Otto Sonnenholzner Lenín Voltaire Moreno Garcés Mayo 24, 2017 - En el cargo Vicepresidenta encargada desde el 04 de octubre del 2017 y designada Octubre 4, 2017 - Diciembre 4, 2018 el 06 de enero del 2018 Vicepresidenta de la República por la Asamblea Nacional, luego de la destitución de Jorge Glas. Renunció el 04 de diciembre de 2018 María Alejandra Vicuña Muñoz Mayo 24, 2017 - Enero 02, 2018 Sandra Naranjo fue Vicepresidenta encargada entre el 04 de enero y el 20 de Mayo 24, 2013 - Mayo 24, 2017 febrero del 2017 y entre el 13 y 30 de marzo del 2017. Jorge David Glas Espinel Rafael Vicente Correa Delgado Enero 15, 2007 - Mayo 24, 2017 Enero 15, 2007 - Mayo 24, 2013 Lenín Voltaire Moreno Garcés Mayo 05, 2005 - Enero 15, 2007 Luis Alfredo Palacios González Abril 20, 2005 - Enero 15, 2007 Nicanor Alejandro Serrano Aguilar Enero 15, 2003 - Abril 20, 2005 Lucio Edwin Gutiérrez Borbúa Enero 15, 2003 - Abril 20, 2005 Luis Alfredo Palacios González Enero 22, 2000 - Enero 15, 2003 Gustavo José Joaquín Noboa Bejarano Enero 22, 2000 - Enero 15, 20003 Pedro Alfredo Pinto Rubianes Agosto 10, 1998 - Enero 21, 2000 Jorge Jamil Mahuad Witt Agosto 10, 1998 - Enero 21, 2000 Gustavo José Joaquín Noboa Bejarano Abril 01, 1998 - Agosto 10, 1998 Pedro Aguayo Cubillo Fabián Ernesto Alarcón Rivera Febrero
    [Show full text]
  • Beneath the Surface: Argentine-United States Relations As Perón Assumed the Presidency
    Beneath the Surface: Argentine-United States Relations as Perón Assumed the Presidency Vivian Reed June 5, 2009 HST 600 Latin American Seminar Dr. John Rector 1 Juan Domingo Perón was elected President of Argentina on February 24, 1946,1 just as the world was beginning to recover from World War II and experiencing the first traces of the Cold War. The relationship between Argentina and the United States was both strained and uncertain at this time. The newly elected Perón and his controversial wife, Eva, represented Argentina. The United States’ presence in Argentina for the preceding year was primarily presented through Ambassador Spruille Braden.2 These men had vastly differing perspectives and visions for Argentina. The contest between them was indicative of the relationship between the two nations. Beneath the public and well-documented contest between Perón and United States under the leadership of Braden and his successors, there was another player whose presence was almost unnoticed. The impact of this player was subtlety effective in normalizing relations between Argentina and the United States. The player in question was former United States President Herbert Hoover, who paid a visit to Argentina and Perón in June of 1946. This paper will attempt to describe the nature of Argentine-United States relations in mid-1946. Hoover’s mission and insights will be examined. In addition, the impact of his visit will be assessed in light of unfolding events and the subsequent historiography. The most interesting aspect of the historiography is the marked absence of this episode in studies of Perón and Argentina3 even though it involved a former United States President and the relations with 1 Alexander, 53.
    [Show full text]
  • Republica Del Ecuador
    REPUBLICA DEL ECUADOR SECRET ARIA GENERAL DEL CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD NACIONAL INSTITUTO DE ALTOS ESTUDIOS NACIONALES XIII Curso Superior de Seguridad Nacional y Desarrollo TRABAJO DE INVESTIGACION INDlVIDUAl~ "EL CONGRESO NACIONAL EN SUS FUNCIONES LEGISLATIVA y FISCALIZADORA" Dr. Vicente Izquierdo P. ~985 - 19861 D E D 1 C A T O R 1 A A mi esposa María y a mis hijos: María Catherine, José Miguel y María Gabriela Flor, la más linda que brotó de tus entrañas de un momento de sublime inspiración, una niña surgió, me dijo un día era nuestra hija, donde la vida entera y tu ser de madre harás lucir su corazón sensible. Cuenca, junio de 1976 1 PRO L o G o Como culminación a una tarea llevada a cabo en el transcurso de estos meses, en la que se ha evidenciado de manera primordial, un trabajo con~ tante y profundo de la realidad geopolítica, económica y social de nues tra Nación, ha constituido un deber y al mismo tiempo una satisfacción, realizar la presente investigación, como un aporte más a los altos obj~ tivos que persigue el Instituto de Altos Estudios Naciondles, dl prepd­ rftr hombres que, conociendo su realidad, se transformen en un vínculo entre la teoría y la praxis que materializa al individuo en un ser posi tivo al servicio de los grandes intereses de la Patria. Toda investigación implica muchas horas de dedicación, buscando datos, quizás en muchos libros olvidados, buscando en archivos y recorriendo bi b1iotecas, pero con el convencimiento de que sólo su recopilación, con­ ducirá a los justificativos que motivaron el entusiasmo de las primeras líneas.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Document Forming Part of the Reports of States Parties El Salvador
    United Nations HRI/CORE/SLV/2011 International Human Rights Distr.: General 12 November 2012 Instruments English Original: Spanish Core document forming part of the reports of States parties El Salvador* [5 January 2011] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.12-47562 (EXT) HRI/CORE/SLV/2011 Contents Paragraphs Page I. General information about the reporting State ........................................................ 1–136 3 A. Demographic, economic, social and cultural characteristics of the State ....... 1–54 3 B. Constitutional, political and legal structure of the State ................................. 55–136 15 II. General framework for the protection and promotion of human rights................... 137–223 34 A. Acceptance of international human rights norms............................................ 137–140 34 B. Legal framework for the protection of human rights at national level............ 141–174 38 C. Framework within which human rights are promoted at national level.......... 175–212 43 D. Reporting process at national level................................................................. 213–223 49 III. Information on non-discrimination and equality and effective remedies................ 224–247 50 A. Non-discrimination and equality..................................................................... 224–232 50 B. Effective remedies .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cohoon Tcu 0229M 10574.Pdf
    THE RADICAL LIBERAL TRADITION, SCIENTIFIC RACISM, AND PANAMA’S CARLOS ANTONIO MENDOZA, 1880–1916 By WILLIAM PATRICK COHOON Bachelor of Arts, 2012 Portland State University Portland, Oregon Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of AddRan College of Liberal Arts Texas Christian University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Masters of Arts May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To begin, any mistakes with translations or errors in this work are my own. Next, I want to thank the staff at la Biblioteca Nacional and Archivo Porras in la Biblioteca Simón Bolívar at la Universidad de Panamá. Your help and recommendations aided me tremendously with my project. I conducted my research in Panama due to the generosity of Dr. Paul Boller through the Boller-Worcester Travel Grant from the Department of History, and a Graduate Student Travel Grant from the GSA at Texas Christian University. Thank you! To the staff at Inter Library Loans in the Mary Couts Burnett Library at TCU, your flexibility and aid in finding obscure books always amazes me. I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Peter Szok who offered me an opportunity to explore the complicated cultural and social history of Panama during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Thank you Professor Szok for your advice, confidence, rigorous attention to detail, and patience working with me on this project. I am a better scholar because of your help. I want to also extend my many thanks to Dr. Susan E. Ramirez and Dr. Jodi Campbell who contributed wonderful recommendations to improve my thesis. Dr. Todd Kerstetter, words cannot express my gratitude for your sympathy and kindness that you showed in February 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Surnames of Latin American Presidents
    BASQUE LEGACY IN THE NEW WORLD: ON THE SURNAMES OF LATIN AMERICAN PRESIDENTS Patxi Salaberri Iker Salaberri UPNA / NUP UPV / EHU Abstract In this article we explain the etymology of the surnames of Basque origin that some presidents of Latin American countries have or have had in the past. These family names were created in the language called Euskara, in the Basque Country (Europe), and then, when some of the people who bore them emigrated to America, they brought their sur- names with them. Most of the family names studied here are either oiconymic or topo- nymic, but it must be kept in mind that the oiconymic ones are, very often, based on house-nicknames, that is, they are anthroponymic in the first place. As far as possible, we have related the surname, when its origin is oiconymic or toponymic, to its source, i.e. to the house or place where it was created. Key words: Basque, etymology, family name, Latin America, oiconym, placename, nickname. Laburpena Artikulu honetan Erdialdeko eta Hego Amerikako herrialdeetako presidente batzuek dituzten eta izan dituzten euskal jatorriko deituren etimologia azaltzen dugu. Abizenok euskararen barnean sortu ziren, Euskal Herrian, eta euskaldunek Ameriketara emigratu zutelarik eraman zituzten berekin. Aztertzen diren deitura gehienak etxe edo toki ize- nak dira, baina aintzat hartu behar da oikonimikoek, askotan, etxe izengoitietan dutela sorburu, hots, antroponimikoak zirela hasmentan. Ahal izan dugunean abizena iturria- rekin lotu dugu, etorkiz etxe edo leku izena zenean, alegia, deitura sortu zen etxe edo le- kuarekin batu dugu. Giltza hitzak: Euskara, etimologia, deitura, Hego eta Erdialdeko Amerika, etxe izena, leku izena, izengoitia.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty and The
    The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Sebastian Hurtado-Torres December 2016 © 2016 Sebastian Hurtado-Torres. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei's Revolution in Liberty, and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 by SEBASTIAN HURTADO-TORRES has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Patrick Barr-Melej Associate Professor of History Robert Frank Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT HURTADO-TORRES, SEBASTIAN, Ph.D., December 2016, History The Gathering Storm: The United States, Eduardo Frei’s Revolution in Liberty, and the Polarization of Chilean Politics, 1964-1970 Director of Dissertation: Patrick Barr-Melej This dissertation explores the involvement of the United States in Chilean politics between the presidential campaign of 1964 and Salvador Allende’s accession to the presidency in 1970. The main argument of this work is that the partnership between the Christian Democratic Party of Chile (PDC) and the United States in this period played a significant role in shaping Chilean politics and thus contributed to its growing polarization. The alliance between the PDC and the United States was based as much on their common views on communism as on their shared ideas about modernization and economic development. Furthermore, the U.S. Embassy in Santiago, headed by men strongly committed to the success of the Christian Democratic project, involved itself heavily in the inner workings of Chilean politics as an informal actor, unable to dictate terms but capable of exerting influence on local actors whose interests converged with those of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Nationalizations in Bolivia and Mexico Established a Period of Tension and Conflict with U.S
    The Oil Nationalizations in Bolivia (1937) and Mexico (1938): a comparative study of asymmetric confrontations with the United States Fidel Pérez Flores IREL/UnB [email protected] Clayton M. Cunha Filho UFC [email protected] 9o Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencia Política ¿Democracias en Recesión? Montevideo, 26-28 de julio de 2017 2 The Oil Nationalizations in Bolivia (1937) and Mexico (1938): a comparative study of asymmetric confrontations with the United States I. Introduction Between 1937 and 1942, oil nationalizations in Bolivia and Mexico established a period of tension and conflict with U.S. companies and government. While in both cases foreign companies were finally expelled from host countries in what can be seen as a starting point for the purpose of building a national oil industry, a closer look at political processes reveal that the Bolivian government was less successful than the Mexican in maintaining its initial stand in face of the pressure of both the foreign company and the U.S. Government. Why, despite similar contextual conditions, was it more difficult for Bolivian than for Mexican officials to deal with the external pressures to end their respective oil nationalization controversy? The purpose of this study is to explore, in light of the Mexican and Bolivian oil nationalizations of the 1930’s, how important domestic politics is in less developed countries to maintain divergent preferences against more powerful international actors. This paper focuses on the political options of actors from peripheral countries in making room for their own interests in an international system marked by deep asymmetries. We assume that these options are in part the product of processes unfolding inside national political arenas.
    [Show full text]