DOCSLIB.ORG

(Public Pack)Agenda Document for North East of Scotland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for North East of Scotland Public Document Pack To: Councillor Peter Argyle, Chair; Dr Margaret Bochel and Councillor Sandra Macdonald, Vice Chairs; Mr Eddie Anderson, Councillor David Aitchison, Councillor Philip Bell, Councillor John Cox, Mr Gerry Donald, Mr David Jennings, Mr George Mair, Mr Ian Ross, Councillor Alex Nicoll, Stephen Archer, Councillor Colin Pike and Councillor Jennifer Stewart. Aberdeen City Council Substitute Members:- Councillors Ross Grant, Brett Hunt, Michael Hutchison and Ian Yuill. Aberdeenshire Council Substitute Members:- Councillors George Carr, Martin Ford, Ian Mollison and Gillian Owen Please note that a substitute member may only participate in the meeting when a substantive member is absent. Should you require further information regarding the Agenda, please contact Derick Murray 01224 346680 NORTH EAST OF SCOTLAND TRANSPORT PARTNERSHIP Meeting of Board (Committee Room 2 Woodhill House, Aberdeen) WEDNESDAY, 18 APRIL 2018 at 2.00 pm. AGENDA 1 Minute of Board Meeting, 14 February 2018 (Pages 3 - 10) 2 Presentation – Scott Prentice, Head of Business Development, Abellio ScotRail & Derek Glasgow, Abellio ScotRail 3 Strategy 3a Director's Report (Pages 11 - 16) 4 Projects - Not Taken Up 5 Action Plans 5a Health & Transport Action Plan: Update (Pages 17 - 22) 5b Freight Action Plan Update (Pages 23 - 26) 5c Bus Action Plan: Passenger Satisfaction (Pages 27 - 28) 5d Rail Matters Update (Pages 29 - 32) 6 General 6a Progress Report (Pages 33 - 70) 6b Publications and Consultations (Pages 71 - 78) 6c Road Casualty Reduction: Safety Cameras (Pages 79 - 84) 7 Budget Matters 7a 2017/18 Budget Matters (Pages 85 - 92) 7b 2018/19 Budget Proposals (Pages 93 - 102) 7c Revised Financial Regulations (Pages 103 - 128) 7d Treasury Management Strategy Statement 2018/19 (Pages 129 - 138) 8 Information Bulletin (Pages 139 - 146) 9 Conferences and Presentations (Pages 147 - 148) 10 Pending Business and Reports for Future Meetings (Pages 149 - 150) Agenda Item 1 Minute of Meeting of the North East Scotland Transport Partnership Board Aberdeen, Wednesday 14 February 2018 Present: Councillor Peter Argyle (Chairperson); Dr Margaret Bochel (Vice Chairperson), Councillor Sandra Macdonald (Vice Chairperson); and Councillors David Aitchison, Philip Bell, John Cox, Alex Nicoll, Colin Pike and Jennifer Stewart; and Gerry Donald. In attendance: Mr George Mair (Adviser to the Board), Lucy Johnson, Andrew Leil and Ewan Wallace (Aberdeenshire Council), Robert Templeton (Aberdeen City Council), Derick Murray, Rab Dickson and Jenny Anderson (Nestrans), Mark Masson (Clerk, Aberdeen City Council), Councillors Jim Gifford and Ian Mollison (Aberdeenshire Council) James Savege (Chief Executive – Aberdeenshire Council), Humza Yousaf MSP (Minister for Transport and Islands), Kat Kennedy (Private Secretary) and Joanne Gray and Jacqueline McDonald (Transport Scotland). Apologies: Eddie Anderson and Eric Owens (Aberdeen City Council, Adviser to the Board). MINUTE OF BOARD MEETING, 13 DECEMBER 2017 1. The Board had before it the minute of its previous meeting of 13 December, 2017 for approval. The Board resolved:- to approve the minute. MINUTE OF THE APPOINTMENTS SUB COMMITTEE SHORTLISTING MEETING OF 19 DECEMBER 2017 2. The Board had before it the minute of the Appointments Sub Committee of 19 December, 2017 for noting. The Board resolved:- to note the minute. MINUTE OF THE APPOINTMENTS SUB COMMITTEE INTERVIEW MEETING OF 9 JANUARY 2018 3. The Board had before it the minute of the Appointments Sub Committee of 9 January, 2018 for noting. The Board resolved:- to note the minute. Page 3 MR HUMZA YOUSAF, MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT & THE ISLANDS 4. The Board welcomed Mr Humza Yousaf MSP, Minister for Transport and the Islands to the meeting. The Board raised a number of key issues with the Minister, in particular regarding the National Transport Strategy, Planning Review and Planning Bill, the Aberdeen region renaissance strategy and the Strategic Transport Appraisal, the Aberdeen to Central Belt Rail link, the A96 and Aberdeen to Fraserburgh/Peterhead corridor and the A9 and A96 road dualling. During the discussion, the following was noted:- there was an effort to reduce the rail journey time between Aberdeen and the central belt, noting that the ARUP consultant’s report was due in the Summer, following which, there was a need to inject pace to the project and identify timescales; although the vast majority of funding would be spent in the North East, some funding would also be utilised elsewhere to improve journey times between Aberdeen and the central belt; interventions were required on the single rail track pinch points, although it was acknowledged that there were some significant engineering problems to overcome to achieve this; general processes and a timetable would be considered and produced for circulation to the Nestrans Chair with a further meeting being arranged with Nestrans officials as deemed necessary; it was acknowledged that improved working arrangements and transparency in relation to the City Region Deal was required; there was a requirement for the RTP Chairs to meet with Kevin Stewart MSP, Minister for Local Government and Housing regarding the strength of feeling in relation to the statutory nature of the Planning Bill; it was acknowledged that not all parts of Scotland were the same and one size does not fit all in terms of the Bill; that further work was being done on the STAG appraisal process which was deemed too cumbersome; that there was an appreciation of the level of studies undertaken by Nestrans in relation to the National Transport Strategy, the work completed would inform discussion and identify future investment projects; that interventions on the A90 would deliver huge improvements for the road network north of Aberdeen and benefit road safety, a proposed roundabout at the Toll of Birness would solve problems in this regard; collaboration between local authorities, RTPs and Transport Scotland to deliver projects had been recognised; it was acknowledged that there was a need to upgrade junctions on the A96 between AWPR and Inverurie for safety reasons; it was recognised that some interventions which were not for the local authorities to undertake required to be identified and be fed back to Keith Brown MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Economy, Jobs and Fair Work for consideration; that a Low Emission Zone in Glasgow would be introduced at the end of the year, following which, work to have similar zones introduced in Edinburgh followed by Aberdeen and Dundee would be undertaken in 2020 with other areas being considered in 2022/2023; Page 4 it was acknowledged that there would be collaborative process in relation to Low Emission Zones (possibly to be renamed Clean Air Zones), providing local flexibility to identify areas/streets leading to a 3 or 4 year phasing-in period to allow preparation time for businesses/car companies etc; and it was acknowledged that proper infrastructure in to Aberdeen International Airport, specifically to encourage public transport and a surface access strategy was required. The Minister also made reference to (1) the procurement process for the Northern Isles Ferry and the proposed increased capacity and passenger growth in terms of the new Harbour at Bay of Nigg; and (2) a future meeting with Carol Benzies, Managing Director, Aberdeen International Airport to discuss various issues. The Board resolved:- (i) to thank Mr Humza Yousaf MSP, Minister for Transport and Islands for attending the meeting today; (ii) to request the Director of Nestrans to write to the Minister with the action points raised at the meeting; and (iii) to note that the Minister would follow up the issues raised and would provide a response to the Chairperson in due course. DIRECTOR'S REPORT 5. The Board had before it a report by the Director of Nestrans which provided an update on liaison with other Regional Transport Partnerships (RTPs), the Scottish Government and other organisations. The report recommended:- that the Board note progress on liaison arrangements with other RTPs, the Scottish Government and other arrangements for future meetings. The Board resolved:- to approve the recommendation. RISK REGISTER 6. With reference to article 9(2) of the minute of meeting of 27 August 2008, the Board had before it a report which provided information on the recent review of the Nestrans Risk Register to ensure significant risks were identified, evaluated and controlled. The report recommended:- that the Board consider the attached risk register and approve its implementation. The Committee resolved:- to approve the recommendation. Page 5 FRASERBURGH AND PETERHEAD TO ABERDEEN STRATEGIC TRANSPORT STUDY: NEXT STEPS 7. With reference to article 5 of the minute of meeting of 3 November 2017, the Board had before it a report which provided information on the progress on the Fraserburgh and Peterhead to Aberdeen Strategic Transport Study. The report recommended:- that the Board – (a) note the contents of the report and the responses from the local authorities; and (b) instruct officers to:- (1) commission further work on the rail elements, to gain a better understanding of potential and likely impact on other rail aspirations as indicated above; (2) enter into discussion with Transport Scotland, to engage with them on both rail and roads prospects and how to best progress the schemes; and (3) ensure that the options are fully considered in the City Region Deal Strategic Transport Appraisal. The Board resolved:- (i) to approve the recommendations; and (ii) to note that the Director of Nestrans would respond to Councillor Cox on the assumptions contained within the previous reports. A96 AND A947 STRATEGIC ROADS UPDATE 8. With reference to article 13 of the minute of meeting of 3 November 2017, the Board had before it a report which provided an update in relation to progress with developments affecting the A96 Aberdeen to Inverness trunk road and the A947 Dyce to Banff route. The report recommended:- that the Board note the contents of the report. The Board resolved:- to approve the recommendation. BUS ACTION PLAN: BUS QUALITY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Short History of the Highlands Hill and Monykebbock Tramway
    A Short History of the Highlands Hill and Monykebbock Tramway By A. White-Settler Introduction to the Second Edition On hearing ‘Highlands’ in connection with Scotland, images of the hills and mountains towards the middle and the west of the country usually come to mind. In this case however, ‘Highlands’ is the local name given to a small area of rolling countryside to the north of Dyce in Aberdeenshire, close to the village of Newmachar. The Highlands Hill and Monykebbock Tramway (to give it its full name) was a short narrow gauge line originally built to serve a pair of crofts in that area by taking feed out to the fields, quarrying stone for boundary walls and collecting ‘Swailend Earth’, used as fertile topsoil for local growers. In later years, it was used by a local college to provide courses for light railway operations, and to support forestry courses, and became home for the Garioch Industrial Narrow Gauge Railway Society (G.I.N.G.R.S.). In conversation (and often in writing), most people would call it “The Highlands Tramway” or simply “The Tramway”. What follows is a very short history of an obscure line, built up from snippets of conversation in various pubs and small businesses around the area. It is thought that the line fell out of use in the late 1960s; an increasingly small number of people have distant memories of the tramway, and I have been unable to find any reference to it in any library or local newspaper archives. Although the local farmer kindly granted me access to his land, it would appear that all but a few traces of the tramway have been obliterated, and so whilst I have made my best efforts to make this history as comprehensive as possible, unfortunately the accuracy of any information that follows cannot always be assured.
    [Show full text]
  • A96 Dualling Programme
    A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment Tier 2 Environmental Report An agency of Buidheann le May 2015 An agency of Buidheann le A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment Tier 2 Environmental Report Document: TSEA96/ER/02 Transport Scotland May 2015 A96 Dualling – Strategic Environmental Assessment – Tier 2 – Environmental Report Document history A96 Dualling Programme Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Tier 2 Environmental Report Transport Scotland This document has been issued and amended as follows: Approved Version Date Description Created by Verified by by 1.0 January 2015 Discussion Draft Susan Rodger/ Henry Collin John Fox Gwenn Greenwood 1.1 April 2015 Draft for Client Comment Ailsa Collin / Gwenn Henry Collin John Fox Greenwood / Henry Collin 1.2 May 2015 Issue Version Ailsa Collin / Gwenn Henry Collin John Fox Greenwood / Henry Collin A96 Dualling – Strategic Environmental Assessment – Tier 2 – Environmental Report Limitations Halcrow Group Ltd, now known as CH2M HILL, has been instructed to provide a Strategic Environmental Assessment of the A96 Dualling Programme on behalf of Transport Scotland. The assessment is based on the information that has been made available at the time of publication and this Environmental Report is presented as a consultation document. Any subsequent additional information arising during the public consultation period may require revision or refinement of the conclusions. It should be noted that: • The findings within this report represent the professional opinion of experienced environmental scientists, sustainability consultants and other specialists. CH2M HILL does not provide legal advice and the advice of lawyers may also be required. • All work carried out in preparing this report has utilised and is based upon CH2M HILL’s professional knowledge and understanding of current relevant European Union, UK and Scottish standards and codes, technology and legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestrans Draft Nestrans Strategic Investment Programme - 2017/18 Appendix 2
    Nestrans Draft Nestrans Strategic Investment Programme - 2017/18 Appendix 2 RTS Project Project Details 2016/17 2017/18 2017/18 delayed proposals draft draw down budget IC1 Rail Kintore Railway Station Design of Car Park, Further works associated with Station Fund Bid and £527,000 £488,000 £1,015,000 Legal Costs associated with the Compulsory Purchase Order THEME TOTAL £527,000 £488,000 £1,015,000 IC2a Strategic Road Capacity Improvements Strategic network monitoring Phase The Third phased deployment of an Internet Protocol closed-circuit £150,000 £150,000 3 television (IPCCTV) equipment at traffic signals, along strategic transport corridors. This phase would aim to further capture nodes along A956 Wellington Road and King Street and the A944 corridor. AWPR Signage in Aberdeenshire Development of Signage Strategy and Preliminary Design of Strategic £30,000 £30,000 Signage THEME TOTAL £30,000 £150,000 £180,000 IC2b Strategic Road Safety Improvements A947 Road Safety Improvements Delivery of Action Plan and Development of Business Cases for £80,000 £80,000 individual schemes along the corridor A92 / A90 Lower Northwater Bridge Reflective Road Studs £1,680 £1,680 A93 Peterculter to Braemar Reflective Road Studs £21,112 £21,112 A944 / B993 to A97 Reflective Road Studs £28,630 A97 / A944 to Formartine Reflective Road Studs £48,426 A93 Neth Knox Embankment Reconstruction (Gabions) £100,000 B9119 Queen’s Cross pedestrian Two pedestrian crossings at the Queens Cross Roundabout (Queens £25,000 £25,000 crossing upgrades Road and Carden Place) have been the location of child pedestrian injury accidents. It is proposed to provide additional and updated infrastructure at these locations to highlight the crossings to drivers, reducing red light running, and make a safer environment for pedestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-Àite Ann an Sgìre Prìomh Bhaile Na Gàidhealtachd
    Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Place-Names of Inverness and Surrounding Area Ainmean-àite ann an sgìre prìomh bhaile na Gàidhealtachd Roddy Maclean Author: Roddy Maclean Photography: all images ©Roddy Maclean except cover photo ©Lorne Gill/NatureScot; p3 & p4 ©Somhairle MacDonald; p21 ©Calum Maclean. Maps: all maps reproduced with the permission of the National Library of Scotland https://maps.nls.uk/ except back cover and inside back cover © Ashworth Maps and Interpretation Ltd 2021. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2021. Design and Layout: Big Apple Graphics Ltd. Print: J Thomson Colour Printers Ltd. © Roddy Maclean 2021. All rights reserved Gu Aonghas Seumas Moireasdan, le gràdh is gean The place-names highlighted in this book can be viewed on an interactive online map - https://tinyurl.com/ybp6fjco Many thanks to Audrey and Tom Daines for creating it. This book is free but we encourage you to give a donation to the conservation charity Trees for Life towards the development of Gaelic interpretation at their new Dundreggan Rewilding Centre. Please visit the JustGiving page: www.justgiving.com/trees-for-life ISBN 978-1-78391-957-4 Published by NatureScot www.nature.scot Tel: 01738 444177 Cover photograph: The mouth of the River Ness – which [email protected] gives the city its name – as seen from the air. Beyond are www.nature.scot Muirtown Basin, Craig Phadrig and the lands of the Aird. Central Inverness from the air, looking towards the Beauly Firth. Above the Ness Islands, looking south down the Great Glen.
    [Show full text]
  • Man in Moray
    10 0 I w! Fig.2.1 Moray. MANIN MORAY 5,000 years of history Ian Keillar Synopsis The extent of Moray is defined and the physical conditions briefly described. Traces of Mesolithic man have been found in the Culbin, and later Neolithic peoples found Moray an attractive place to settle. As metal working became established, trades routes followed and Moray flourished. As the climate deteriorated, so, apparently, did the political situation and defensive sites became necessary. The Romans came and went and the Picts rose and fell. The Vikings did not linger on these shores and MacBeth never met any witches near Forres. The Kings of Scots divided and ruled until they themselves set a pattern, which still continues, that if you want to get on you must go south to London. In distant Moray, brave men like Montrose and foolish men like Prince Charles Edward, fought for their rightful king. The Stuarts, however, ill rewarded their followers. Road makers and bridge builders half tamed the rivers, and the railways com­ pleted the process. With wars came boom years for the farmers, but even feather beds wear out and Moray is once more in apparent decline. However, all declines are relative and the old adage still has relevance: 'Speak wee] o the Hielans but live in the Laich.' Physical The name Moray is now applied to a local authority administrative District extending from west of Forres and the Findhorn to Cullen and stretching down in an irregular triangle into the highlands of the Cairngorms (Fig.2. l ). In Medieval times, Moray reached as far as Lochalsh on the west coast and there has always been some difficulty in defining the bound­ aries of the province.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardmuir to Fochabers
    A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option A96 Dualling A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers: Preferred option KEY Further information What happens next? Introduction Existing A96 dual carriageway section Shortlisted options assessment Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme Existing A96 single carriageway section Should you wish to contact Inverness to Nairn (inc. Nairn bypass) Transport Scotland is progressing an Lossiemouth AWPR Transport Scotland and its consultants Mott MacDonald Sweco will further develop Mott MacDonald Sweco, For the purposes of options assessment the A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Buckie ambitious programme that will see the Ban Fochabers scheme has been divided into three sections: the preferred option. details for the stakeholder Preferred option HARDMUIR TO FOCHABERS Elgin dualling of the A96 between Inverness A96 Transport Scotland will look to publish draft Orders and an Environmental Impact team are: Fraserburgh • Hardmuir to Hillhead. and Aberdeen by 2030. The route is Assessment Report for the A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme during the Keith Public exhibitions A96 Fochabers • Hillhead to Lhanbryde. Landowner and Communities approximately 160km (99 miles) long, Forres second half of 2020 for formal comment. Nairn • Lhanbryde to East of Fochabers. of which 138km (86 miles) is currently The draft Road Orders will define the line of the developed preferred option. The draft Manager: Dave Gowans December 2018 Huntly Peterhead For each section, the performance of a north and a south option has single carriageway. INVERNESS Compulsory Purchase Order will define the extent of land required to deliver, operate Tel: 01309 250 380 been assessed to determine a preference.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Scotland — A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvement 7-1 7
    Transport Scotland — A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvement 7 CULTRAL HERITAGE 7.1 Introduction This Chapter provides an assessment of the potential effects of the construction and operation of the proposed A96 Inveramsay Bridge Improvements (the Scheme) on cultural heritage (built heritage, archaeology and designed historic landscapes). As a highways Scheme, this assessment has been prepared in accordance with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) Detailed Assessment (DMRB Volume 11 Section 3, Part 2 Cultural Heritage HA 208/07, 2007). In accordance with advice contained in DMRB Volume 11, an Options Appraisal (Stage 2 Simple Assessment) was undertaken in September 2011. This determined that the cultural heritage resource had the potential to be impacted by the Scheme. This was confirmed as part of a Scoping exercise (April 2012) which concluded that a detailed assessment was required. The objective of a DMRB Detailed Assessment (Volume 11, Parts 2 and 3), as required for inclusion in the Environmental Statement, is to: undertake sufficient assessment to identify the location, type and importance of cultural heritage constraints; characterise and assess the importance of the cultural heritage of the study area; determine the likely nature and scale of potential impacts from construction and operation of the Scheme; and determine mitigation measures to reduce or remedy any adverse impacts. 7.2 Approach & Methods 7.2.1 Plans and Policies This assessment has been undertaken in accordance with current legislation and planning policy. The following relevant documents have been used in the preparation of this report: The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2011; Historic Environment (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 2011; Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP) 2011; Scottish Planning Policy (2010); and Planning Advice Note 2/2011 – Planning and Archaeology (2011).
    [Show full text]
  • A947 Route Improvement Strategy
    A947 ROUTE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY CONSULTATION REPORT People reached via Social Media about 14000 the consultation Circulation of 9800 newspapers (Turriff/Ellon/ Inverurie Advertiser) which carried an advert promoting the consultation exercise @# Freepost Travel Surveys inserted into the 750 Banffshire Journal Paper Surveys distributed at Community Facilities and GP 4500 Surgeries on the A947 500 People spoken to during a 681 two day consultation Respondents to the stand at the Turriff Show detailed A947 Travel Survey (Online & Paper) “ 297 Respondents to a Freepost Freepost Travel Surveys completed Travel Survey provided as via the Banffshire Journal Inserts ” part of a Roadside Interview Surveys on the A947 155 7 Businesses A947 in located on the A947 participated in a detailed Numbers telephone interview. Table of Contents 1. Approach to Consultation ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Summary of Findings........................................................................................................................................................ 3 Appendix A: RSI Survey – Questionnaire and Results ............................................................................................................. 17 Appendix B: Online Survey – Questionnaire & Results ............................................................................................................ 18 Appendix C: Newspaper Survey – Questionnaire
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn 5.2 Site Address Land At
    5. Site Details 5.1 What name would you like the Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn site to be known by? (Please note if the site is currently included within the ALDP2017 please use the OP site number) 5.2 Site Address Land at Newton Croft, Bucksburn 5.3 Postcode AB21 9PD 5.4 Have you any information for No the site on the internet? If so please provide the web address: 5.5 Is the site currently being The land is under option to Mactaggart & Mickel marketed? Homes Ltd, an established national housebuilder. 5.6 Site Location Map OS Base Map attached. (Please include an OS Map with the Boundary of the site clearly marked) 5.7 Please provide the National Grid reference of the site. 5.8 What is the current use of the Grazing land site? 5.9 Has there been any previous No development on the site? If yes please provide details 6. Legal and Planning History 6.1 Please indicate the Sole owner relationship to the Part owner Proposer or Person / Option to purchase Organisation they are working on No legal interest behalf of, has with the site. 6.2 Is the site under Yes, the site is under option to Mactaggart & option to a Mickel Homes Ltd, an established national developer? housebuilder. 6.3 Is the proposed site No included in the ALDP2017? 6.4 Is the proposed site N/A included in the Aberdeen City Centre Masterplan? 6.5 Has the site been Yes, through previous LDP processes. subject of previous discussions with the Council or any agent there of? 6.6 Has the site been No subject of previous Planning Applications? (Please 6.7 Has the site been Yes, Partially.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Sustainable Economic Growth 2017/18
    Sustainable Economic Growth Statement 2017/18 – 2018/19 Introduction Section 32(1)(a) of the Public Services Reform (Scotland) Act 2010 provides that as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of each financial year each listed public body must publish a statement of the steps it has taken during the financial year to promote and increase sustainable growth through the exercise of its functions. Nestrans is a listed body within the Act. This statement is intended to fulfil the requirement of the Act in relation to Sustainable Economic Growth. This statement should be read in conjunction with the statement on Efficiency, Effectiveness and Economy and the financial information provided on the Nestrans website that are also required by the Act. Government purpose and performance framework The purpose of the Scottish Government is to focus government and public services on creating a more successful country, with opportunities for all of Scotland to flourish, through increasing sustainable economic growth. The approach to delivering this Purpose is set out in the Scotland’s Economic Strategy published in March 2015 which combines work to boost economic growth and increase competitiveness with a drive to tackle inequality. The updated Strategy has four priorities, namely: • Investing in people and infrastructure in a sustainable way; • Fostering a culture of innovation and research and development; • Promoting inclusive growth and creating opportunity through a fair and inclusive jobs market and regional cohesion; and, • Promoting Scotland on the international stage to boost our trade and investment, influence and networks. Progress towards the Purpose is being measured through a range of Purpose Targets and National Indicators in the National Performance Framework that was updated in March 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Response to A96 Route Options Update Aug2018
    A96 Dualling Team, Transport Scotland, Buchanan House, 58 Port Dundas Road, Glasgow G4 0HF 14th September 2018 Dear Sirs A96 Dualling Hardmuir to Fochabers scheme Route options – Design update August 2018 Thank you for the recent information on the route options being considered for the A96 dualling in the Forres area. The Finderne Community Council (FCC) notes that the southern, Red, route remains under consideration and would make a number of observations and requests for further information with regard to the potential environmental, economic and community impacts of this route as set out below: 1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1.1 Landscape - Proposed crossing of the B9010 The FCC has previously been advised by the project team that the existing B9010 Rafford to Forres road would pass under the proposed dualled A96. We are concerned to note that the revised proposals now have the B9010 being elevated via an embankment with a fly-over bridge across the A96. The concerns that we have previously lodged with regard to the visual impact of significant embankment works across this stretch of countryside have been exacerbated by the revisions made to the proposals. The extent of embankments for both the dualled A96 and the B9010 fly- over will totally dominate the visual appearance of the area. Marcassie Farm Lodges Previous B9010 crossing Revised B9010 crossing 1.2 Woodland Removal The woodlands of Moray and particularly of Finderne are some of our most highly valued environmental assets making a significant contribution to the local landscape, local economy (through on-going timber production), biodiversity, and general quality of life through provision of recreational facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation, Sifting and Appraisal of Interventions
    Appendix A - Interventions taken forward from the Sifting Process National STPR Interventions 50 National Report 3 Page A1 of A168 Appendix A - Interventions taken forward from the Sifting Process National Intervention 301 Expansion of Trunk Road Intelligent Transport System Description Introduction of a toolkit of measures on the motorway and the trunk road network in Central Scotland, covering priority vehicle lanes, ramp metering and intelligent signing. Justification This intervention will contribute to several national objectives, including 'journey time reductions on the trunk road network for prioritised vehicles' and (improved) journey time reliability for all users while 'maximising the labour catchment area in city regions'. This will have a significant impact on road users through efficient management of the trunk road network and by providing journey time information. There are unlikely to be any deliverability issues with this intervention as it would be implemented in line with emerging best practice experience from across Scotland and the UK. National objectives addressed: Objective Addressed Promote 'competitive' inter-urban journey times. Objective Addressed Reduce inter-urban journey time on public transport. Objective Addressed Promote journey time reduction on the trunk road network for prioritised vehicles and users (e.g. high occupancy vehicles, freight, bus) where STAG appraisal demonstrates that a strong economic case can be balanced with environmental objectives. Elsewhere on the trunk road network provide improvements to journey time reliability. Objective Addressed Promote journey time reductions between the central belt and Aberdeen/Inverness primarily to allow business to achieve an effective working day when travelling between these centres. Objective Addressed Maximise the labour catchment area in city regions where economic evidence demonstrates that this is required (favouring public transport and high occupancy vehicles and balancing with other policy measures that promote reduction in need to travel i.e.
    [Show full text]