DOCSLIB.ORG

Changing Identities in a Changing Land: the Romanization of the British Landscape

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Changing Identities in a Changing Land: the Romanization of the British Landscape City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2015 Changing Identities in a Changing Land: The Romanization of the British Landscape Thomas Ryan Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/617 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Changing Identities in a Changing Land: The Romanization of the British Landscape By Thomas J. Ryan Jr. A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2015 Thomas J. Ryan Jr. All Rights Reserved. 2015 ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis _______________ ______________________________ Date Thesis Advisor Matthew K. Gold _______________ _______________________________ Date Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract CHANGING IDENTITIES IN A CHANGING LAND: THE ROMANIZATION OF THE BRITISH LANDSCAPE By Thomas J. Ryan Jr. Advisor: Professor Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis This thesis will examine the changes in the landscape of Britain resulting from the Roman invasion in 43 CE and their effect on the identities of the native Britons. Romanization, as the process is commonly called, and evidence of these altered identities as seen in material culture have been well studied. However, the manifestations of this process in the landscape have been less well examined. Applying current theories in landscape archaeology, the Selsey peninsula oppidum of the Atrebates and two hillforts of the Durotriges, sites that have been well excavated and examined, will be the focus of this thesis. The post invasion uses of these areas will be studied, including the palace at Fishbourne. The two tribes had differing relationships with the Romans, leading the Romans to occupy and modify these landscapes in different ways. The varying strategies both led to changes in how the Britons related to the elite members of their society and the ways in which they moved through and experienced their surrounding landscape. These changes resulted in an identity that was neither purely Roman nor Briton but rather a combined identity of Romano-Britain. iv Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Roman-Briton Contacts through the Conquest Period ................................................................... 1 Romanization .................................................................................................................................. 3 Theories of Landscape .................................................................................................................... 8 Pre-Roman Settlement Forms ....................................................................................................... 21 Hillforts and Oppida ..................................................................................................................... 24 The Atrebates of Selsey Territorial Oppidum ............................................................................... 28 Fishbourne .................................................................................................................................... 32 Chichester ..................................................................................................................................... 42 Hillforts of the Durotriges Territory ............................................................................................. 45 Maiden Castle ............................................................................................................................... 45 Hod Hill ........................................................................................................................................ 51 Roman Occupation of the Hillforts ............................................................................................... 54 Discussion And Conclusions ........................................................................................................ 60 Figures .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Bibliography ................................................................................................................................. 92 v List of Figures Figure 1. Tincommius (Tincomarus) coin ................................................................................... 69 Figure 2. Coin of Verica ............................................................................................................... 70 Figure 3. Southern England .......................................................................................................... 71 Figure 4. Small, enclosed settlement forms .................................................................................. 72 Figure 5. Banjo shaped enclosed settlements ............................................................................... 73 Figure 6. Selsey Peninsula ............................................................................................................ 74 Figure 7. Chichester Entrenchments ............................................................................................. 75 Figure 8. Timber buildings layout ................................................................................................ 76 Figure 9. Early civilian layout ...................................................................................................... 77 Figure 10. Layout of the Proto-Palace .......................................................................................... 78 Figure 11. The palace plan ............................................................................................................ 79 Figure 12. East Wing Palace Entrance .......................................................................................... 80 Figure 13. Pediment and audience chamber ................................................................................. 81 Figure 14. Roman Chichester ....................................................................................................... 82 Figure 15. Maiden Castle Plan ...................................................................................................... 83 Figure 16. Aerial Photo of Maiden Castle .................................................................................... 84 Figure 17. Maiden Castle in Region ............................................................................................. 85 Figure 18. Rampart & Ditch Construction .................................................................................... 86 Figure 19. Eastern Entrance Development ................................................................................... 87 Figure 20. Hod Hill Plan ............................................................................................................... 88 Figure 21. Aerial Photo of Hod Hill ............................................................................................. 89 vi Figure 22. Roman use of artillery ................................................................................................. 90 Figure 23. Roman ditch systems ................................................................................................... 91 vii Introduction When the Romans invaded Britain in 43 CE, the identity of the native Britons began to change, a process commonly called Romanization. These changes were reflected in the landscape of Roman Britain as it was shaped through the interactions of the natives and Romans. The formation of the landscape of Roman Britain and the identity of its people was an interactive process, with each contributing to the development of the other. Looking at the territory of the Atrebates, who were allies of the Romans, and that of the Durotriges, who resisted the Roman invasion, this thesis will examine the native use of the landscape and how it shaped their identity. The native landscape and identity will be compared with post invasion use and how it reshaped the identity of those who occupied it. As with other aspects of Romanization, the changes were more pronounced for elites willing to work within the Roman system. For those who resisted or were not members of the elites, the changes were more complex, generally reflecting a melding of British and Roman culture rather than a replacement of one with the other. Roman-Briton Contacts through the Conquest Period Rome’s first direct involvement in Great Britain occurred with Julius Caesar’s two invasions in 55 BCE and 54 BCE, neither of which established a permanent presence in the country. However, they did lead to expanding trade and political relationships between certain tribes and the Romans. Numismatic evidence indicates the formation of an increasingly stratified society in the south and east of Britain, with tribes led by self-described
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Settlement Hierarchy and Social Change in Southern Britain in the Iron Age
    SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY AND SOCIAL CHANGE IN SOUTHERN BRITAIN IN THE IRON AGE BARRY CUNLIFFE The paper explores aspects of the social and economie development of southern Britain in the pre-Roman Iron Age. A distinct territoriality can be recognized in some areas extending over many centuries. A major distinction can be made between the Central Southern area, dominated by strongly defended hillforts, and the Eastern area where hillforts are rare. It is argued that these contrasts, which reflect differences in socio-economic structure, may have been caused by population pressures in the centre south. Contrasts with north western Europe are noted and reference is made to further changes caused by the advance of Rome. Introduction North western zone The last two decades has seen an intensification Northern zone in the study of the Iron Age in southern Britain. South western zone Until the early 1960s most excavation effort had been focussed on the chaiklands of Wessex, but Central southern zone recent programmes of fieid-wori< and excava­ Eastern zone tion in the South Midlands (in particuiar Oxfordshire and Northamptonshire) and in East Angiia (the Fen margin and Essex) have begun to redress the Wessex-centred balance of our discussions while at the same time emphasizing the social and economie difference between eastern England (broadly the tcrritory depen- dent upon the rivers tlowing into the southern part of the North Sea) and the central southern are which surrounds it (i.e. Wessex, the Cots- wolds and the Welsh Borderland. It is upon these two broad regions that our discussions below wil! be centred.
    [Show full text]
  • The Romanization of the British Landscape
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 Changing Identities in a Changing Land: The Romanization of the British Landscape Thomas Ryan Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/470 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Changing Identities in a Changing Land: The Romanization of the British Landscape By Thomas J. Ryan Jr. A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 Thomas J. Ryan Jr. All Rights Reserved. 2014 ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis _______________ ______________________________ Date Thesis Advisor Matthew K. Gold _______________ ______________________________ Date Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract This thesis will examine the changes in the landscape of Britain resulting from the Roman invasion in 43 CE and their effect on the identities of the native Britons. Romanization, as the process is commonly called, and evidence of these altered identities as seen in material culture have been well studied. However, the manifestations of this process in the landscape have been less well examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Coin Inscriptions and the Origins of Writing in Pre-Roman Britain1 Jonathan Williams
    COIN INSCRIPTIONS AND THE ORIGINS OF WRITING IN PRE-ROMAN BRITAIN1 JONATHAN WILLIAMS Introduction THE subject of writing in pre-Roman Britain has, until recently, been the object of curious neglect among archaeologists and historians. One simple reason for this is that there is not very much of it in evidence. There are no lapidary inscriptions, and only a few, short graffiti and other scraps of evidence (on which see more below). Contrast this with the situation after the Roman conquest, and the overwhelming impression is that pre-Roman Britain was essentially a pre-literate society, and that writing was brought to Britain by the Romans. And yet there is the not inconsiderable corpus of coin legends from pre-Roman Britain which, if allowed to do so, might seem to tell a rather different story. The object of this paper is to see what kind of story that might be. It has always been a major blind-spot of numismatists, and increasingly archaeologists too since they stopped reading ancient texts, that they tend not to think very much about coin legends other than as a key to attributing the coin to a particular tribe, city or ruler. One result of this is that it seems to have gone more or less unremarked upon in most treatments of late iron-age Britain that the coin legends that appear on the coins in the late first century BC are the first, and by far the largest, body of evidence for the introduction of writing into these islands and of its uses in the pre-Roman period.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbaric Splendour: the Use of Image Before and After Rome Comprises a Collection of Essays Comparing Late Iron Age and Early Medieval Art
    Martin with Morrison (eds) Martin with Morrison Barbaric Splendour: the use of image before and after Rome comprises a collection of essays comparing late Iron Age and Early Medieval art. Though this is an unconventional approach, Barbaric Splendour there are obvious grounds for comparison. Images from both periods revel in complex compositions in which it is hard to distinguish figural elements from geometric patterns. Moreover, in both periods, images rarely stood alone and for their own sake. Instead, they decorated other forms of material culture, particularly items of personal adornment and The use of image weaponry. The key comparison, however, is the relationship of these images to those of Rome. Fundamentally, the book asks what making images meant on the fringe of an expanding or contracting empire, particularly as the art from both periods drew heavily before and after Rome from – but radically transformed – imperial imagery. Edited by Toby Martin currently works as a lecturer at Oxford University’s Department for Continuing Education, where he specialises in adult and online education. His research concentrates on theoretical and interpretative aspects of material culture in Early Medieval Europe. Toby Toby F. Martin with Wendy Morrison has also worked as a field archaeologist and project officer in the commercial archaeological sector and continues to work as a small finds specialist. Wendy Morrison currently works for the Chilterns Conservation Board managing the NLHF funded Beacons of the Past Hillforts project, the UK’s largest high-res archaeological LiDAR survey. She also is Senior Associate Tutor for Archaeology at the Oxford University Department for Continuing Education.
    [Show full text]
  • Shining a Light on the Transition from Late Iron Age to Early Roman SE England
    Shining a light on the transition from Late Iron Age to Early Roman SE England Saturday 8th May 2021 Surrey Archaeological Society video conference Surrey Archaeological Society promotes the study of the archaeology, pre-history and history of the County of Surrey. We carry out research, excavations and fieldwork and, by arranging events such as this video conference and through training, publications, practical experience and visits to archaeological sites and places of historical interest, we actively encourage people to take part. Anyone can join – find out more at www.surreyarchaeology.org.uk Welcome to the latest in a series of conferences arranged by the Roman Studies Group of Surrey Archaeological Society. In recent years the Group has carried out or assisted on fieldwork at sites such as Abinger, Ashtead, Chiddingfold, Ewell and Flexford, all of which have added important information to our understanding of the period in the years before and after the time when our part of England became formally a part of the Roman Empire. At the first three sites it has been possible to show a clear link between late prehistoric enclosures and Roman villas. Also across these years several excavations by professional units and the records of the Portable Antiquities Scheme have provided a great deal of relevant information. There are a growing number of sites where later prehistoric landscape features can be shown to continue in use in the Roman period. We aim to set these discoveries in their wider setting in the South-East. Many questions remain
    [Show full text]
  • 2. a History of Dorset Hillfort Investigation
    2. A HISTORY OF DORSET HILLFORT INVESTIGATION John Gale Most of Dorset’s hillforts are to be found on the chalk downlands of the county but others are found on the limestone of Purbeck and in the clay vales to the extreme west of Dorset as well as those on the gravels of Poole basin. Of the 34 sites identified, more than a third have been the subject of some form of excavation but only four of these (Chalbury, Hod Hill, Maiden Castle and Pilsden Pen) could claim to have been significantly sampled. The problem is not that the sites are especially difficult to excavate but rather it is a question of scale. To understand such complex earthworks it would be preferable to excavate them completely but, generally speaking, large scale sampling should be sufficient. With hillforts, of course, the question is how large is large? This is a matter that can only be defined on a case by case basis, but certainly it is likely to be greater than 25% of the whole. Unfortunately, only two hillforts in England and Wales have achieved such attention: Crickley Hill in Gloucestershire (Dixon 1996) and Danebury in Hampshire (Cunliffe 1984), each with more than 50% of their interiors excavated. The most closely and extensively studied of the Dorset hillforts is Maiden Castle, which has been the subject of two major excavation campaigns, Tessa and Mortimer Wheeler in the 1930s (Wheeler 1943) and Niall Shaples in the mid-1980s (Sharples 1991). Neither of these excavations sampled more than a fraction of the enclosed area, in both cases no more than 1%, but the recovered evidence presents a detailed picture of life within the hillfort spanning almost the whole of the Iron Age.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillforts and the Durotriges a Geophysical Survey of Iron Age Dorset
    Hillforts and the Durotriges A geophysical survey of Iron Age Dorset Dave Stewart Miles Russell With contributions by Paul Cheetham and John Gale Illustrations by Justin Russell Aerial photographs by Jo and Sue Crane Archaeopress Archaeology Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 715 9 ISBN 978 1 78491 716 6 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2017 Cover: Flowers Barrow hillfort looking south-east to the English Channel (Jo and Sue Crane) Durotrigian silver stater: obverse and reverse (Miles Russell) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Contents List of Figures ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������iii 1� Introduction: The Durotriges Project ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Miles Russell and Paul Cheetham 2� Defining Hillforts in Dorset �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 7 Dave Stewart and Miles Russell 3� A History of Dorset Hillfort Investigation ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������13
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of the Cleeve to Fyfield Water Main, South Oxfordshire: Excavations in 2006–7
    Oxoniensia 77 txt 2+index_Oxoniensia 08/11/2012 11:15 Page 199 CLEEVE TO FYFIELD WATER MAIN 199 The Archaeology of the Cleeve to Fyfield Water Main, South Oxfordshire: Excavations in 2006–7 JONATHAN HART, E.R. McSLOY and MARY ALEXANDER with contributions by ANGELA AGGUJARO, SARAH COBAIN, HARRIET JACKLIN, ELAINE L. MORRIS, FIONA ROE and SYLVIA WARMAN SUMMARY Excavations in advance of the Cleeve to Fyfield Water Main identified multi-period features at sites on the Berkshire Downs, the Greensand step and the Corallian Ridge. The earliest evidence was a Beaker pit at Hagbourne Hill and an early to middle Bronze-Age pit at Cleeve. The most extensive Iron-Age remains along the pipeline were at Milton Hill, where an early to middle Iron-Age settlement with roundhouses, pits and a possible enclosure was discovered. The Milton Hill site was also occupied during the Roman period. Further Iron- Age and Roman remains were identified on the Corallian Ridge near to the Marcham/ Frilford Iron-Age and Roman religious complex. Possible Anglo-Saxon sunken-featured buildings were found near Drayton. Between May 2006 and May 2007 Cotswold Archaeology undertook archaeological recording along the Cleeve to Fyfield Water Main on behalf of Thames Water Utilities (SU 6070 8165–SP 4250 0015; Fig. 1). The pipeline was constructed in two stages: Cleeve to Hagbourne Hill (17 km) and Hagbourne Hill to Fyfield (17 km). The route began in the Chilterns to the east of the Thames at Cleeve, near Goring. After descending to cross the Thames, it rose to run broadly north-westwards along the northern edge of the Berkshire Downs as far as Lollingdon Hill.
    [Show full text]
  • BRI 50 1 Bookreviews 525..538
    536 REVIEWS which potentially risk missing parts of the widespread settlement. I would have liked a little further interrogation of the oft-repeated idea that East Anglia was a cultural backwater in this period, and interpretation of the site within a framework of regional difference and strategic engagement with the wider Roman Empire. Nevertheless, this report is a useful addition to the East Anglian Archaeology series. As with most EAA volumes, it is reassuringly consistent in layout and can be either easily interrogated for particular interests or engaged with as a whole. University of Nottingham NATASHA HARLOW [email protected] doi: 10.1017/S0068113X19000199 Outside Roman London: Roadside Burials by the Walbrook Stream. By S. Ranieri and A. Telfer, with D. Walker and V. Yendell. Crossrail Archaeology Series 9. Museum of London Archaeology, London, 2017. Pp. xix + 228, illus. Price: £10.00. ISBN 9781907586446. This book provides significant new data on the development of Roman London, and on the complex archaeology of the upper Walbrook landscape in particular. New light is shed on old research questions through new excavation techniques and expert post-excavation analyses as we might expect from MoLA. In keeping with other MoLA publications, the book is attractive, well laid out, and contains many colour illustrations. The support of Crossrail Limited, The Mayor of London, the Department for Transport and Transport for London is acknowledged on the front cover, and a more detailed promotion of Crossrail activities is supplied on the back cover. Despite its title, ‘roadside burial’ is not the principal focus of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • The A, B, C of the Classical Series of Coins Under Tincomarus
    THE A, B, C OF THE CLASSICAL SERIES OF COINS UNDER TINCOMARUS DAVID WOODS TINCOMARUS, who declared himself to be a COM(mii).F(ilius) (‘son of Commius’) upon much of his coinage, ruled a region around Chichester, Noviomagus Reginorum under the Romans, sometime probably about 25 BC–AD 10.1 He struck coinage in gold and silver, two denomina- tions in each, staters and quarter staters in gold, and a unit and minim in silver, to call them by their modern terms. According to the most recent catalogue, he struck 7 types of stater, 9 types of quarter stater, 12 types of silver unit, and 4 types of minim, and this coinage has been divided into four successive series on the basis of its changing style and themes – the Celtic, Proto-Classical, Classical and Crude.2 It has been argued that ‘striking quality, metallurgy, and distribution indicate that the Crude and Classical series were probably from the same mint’, and that ‘it is only in the Celtic series that other mints can be suggested’. 3 Consequently, it is the working assumption here that all of the coins of the Classical series were produced at the same mint, even though no detailed die-study has yet been published to prove this beyond a doubt. Bearing this in mind, the purpose of this article is to investigate the potential sig- nificance of a number of isolated letters – A, B, or C – that occur on the obverse of three different coins in the Classical series, on a quarter stater, a silver unit, and a minim.
    [Show full text]
  • Hambledon Hill - an Overview of Its Past
    Hambledon Hill - an overview of its past By circa 3300BC, about 5300 years ago, the sprawling hilltop above the confluence of the rivers Iwerne and Stour supported a complex of monumental earthworks that included two long-barrows, two enclosures and multiple outworks - the largest complex of its kind and date in Britain. The scale of the interrupted ditches and (as they were originally) timber-faced outworks seems partly attributable to the fear of attack. Within the four previous centuries, burning ramparts were brought down at least three times; the remains of people were found under the rubble, two accompanied by the flint arrowheads that may have killed them. Yet for all its size, this complex was not a town, or even a village. The site appears, at least in its origins, to have been a great necropolis, an ancestral burial ground (except the ‘burials’ here were probably exposed to allow the body to decay and disintegrate. At the same time the site became a meeting place for seasonal celebration, ceremonial and feasting. If occupation was, thus, seasonal and light, human skulls on the bottoms of ditches, and other carefully-placed deposits, indicate that domestic existence was far from the sole interest of the people who looked out across the Dorset landscape from the top of Hambledon Hill. All this we know from the results of major excavations which began in 1974,following the realisation that ploughing was badly eroding what little seemed to remain of the earthworks. When excavation ended in 1986, many hundreds of mostly young archaeologists had been on site for a total of 102 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient British Kings and Other Significant Britons
    Ancient British kings and other significant Britons Here are the names of over 70 people who ruled in Britain c.60 BC-AD 85. Two thirds are known solely from coins, which proves the pivotal importance of coins in helping to piece together the complex politics of pre-Roman Britain. Names on coins are Red. First compiled by Chris Rudd in 2010, this unique king list includes a dozen groups of unknown rulers who minted money, such as the ‘Kings of Herts’. For more info consult ABC or [email protected] NAME IDENTITY REGION REGNAL REGNAL COINS TRIBE DATES (if known) Addedomaros Catuvellauni ‘great in chariots’ or younger brother or son North (and part of c.45-25 BC ‘great in steadfastness’ of Cassivellaunos? Thames Trinovantes) Aesu ‘lord’ or ‘holy’ pagus chief or official of Iceni East Iceni c.AD 30-43? Anglian Agr short for Agricu son or daughter or ally North Trinovantes? c.AD 35-43? ‘war dog’ of Cunobelinus? Thames or Agrippa ‘griffin’? moneyer of Scavo or sub-king East Iceni c.AD 35-45? Ale ‘rock?’ in north Norfolk? Anglian Amminus ‘friend’ son of Cunobelinus and Kent Cantiaci c.AD 30-40 supplicant to Caligula Andoco short for Andocomaros ‘the greatest’ or minor ruler associated with North Catuvellauni c.20-1 BC Andocombogios Tasciovanos, nephew of Thames ‘ace destroyer’? Cassivellaunos? Anarevitos ‘one with foresight’ a son of Eppillus? Kent Cantiaci c.AD 10-15 or ‘unforeknowable’ Anted short for Antedios ‘very Dobunnic ruler (after Corio and Western Dobunni c.AD 20-43? fiery?’ or perhaps ‘one Catti?), self-styled rig ‘king’ who sits in front?’ Antedios ‘very fiery?’ or perhaps powerful king and possible East Iceni c.AD 10-30 ‘one who sits in front?’ ally of Cunobelinus Anglian Arviragus a son of Cunobelinus North Catuvellauni ‘manly/true in battle?’ (Caratacus?) or could be Thames? and mid 1st cent.
    [Show full text]