Introduction 1 to Restore and Reconstruct
Notes INTRODUCTION 1. The differing images of Japan's foreign policy are, obviously, partly a matter of reference points. The majority of commentators on Japanese affairs outside Japan have been Americans (Stockwin, 1985, p. 159). This is particularly true of studies of Japan's foreign and security policies. The comparatively intensive US scholarly and general interest in Japan, with its clearly recognizable great power bias, has led to a situation where '[mJost commentaries about Japanese security policy tend to look either at military or economic issues and few seek to tackle these together in a more comprehensive fashion. Those that examine military security are very much influenced by the Japan-US Security Treaty arrangements and the perspectives of both US and Japanese observers are inevitably bound to be affected by national bias' (Chapman et al., 1983, p. xvii). 2. The many faces of foreign policy show up in language itself. In Japanese documents a number of different concepts are used for foreign policy. Such concepts are gaiko, diplomacy, gaikO seisaku, foreign policy, taigai seisaku, external policy, and taigai kankei, external relations. For scholarly discussions of these concepts, see Sata, 1989, pp. 5-7; Aruga, 1989, pp. 1-3; Eta et al., 1982, pp. 94-8. In official documents, gaiko and gaiko seisaku are used interchange ably. Seiji gaiko, political diplomacy, is sometimes seen in the literature parallel to keizai gaiko, economic diplomacy. The former is hard to distinguish from gaiko - seiji can probably best be described as a kind of embellishment. 3. This definition follows closely the one presented by Nygren in his study of the Soviet foreign-policy doctrine (Nygren, 1984, p.
[Show full text]