DOCSLIB.ORG

Japan's National Security Policy Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Japan's National Security Policy Infrastructure INTRODUCTION | i JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE CAN TOKYO MEET WASHINGTON’S EXPECTATION? Yuki Tatsumi November 2008 ii | JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE Copyright ©2008 The Henry L. Stimson Center ISBN: 0-9770023-9-X Photos by the Ministry of Defense in Japan and the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force Cover design by Rock Creek Creative. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written consent from The Henry L. Stimson Center. The Henry L. Stimson Center 1111 19th Street, NW 12th Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone: 202-223-5956 fax: 202-238-9604 www.stimson.org YUKI TATSUMI | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms............................................................................................................ iv Preface ................................................................................................................ vi Acknowledgements............................................................................................ vii INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: EVOLUTION OF JAPANESE NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY .............. 11 CHAPTER 2: CIVILIAN INSTITUTIONS ................................................................ 33 CHAPTER 3: UNIFORM INSTITUTIONS................................................................ 65 CHAPTER 4: THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.................................................. 97 CHAPTER 5: LEGAL FRAMEWORK................................................................... 121 CHAPTER 6: ASSESSMENT............................................................................... 147 CHAPTER 7: EVOLVING US EXPECTATIONS OF JAPAN .................................... 165 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................... 185 About the Author……………………………………………………………...192 Endnotes………………………………………………………………………193 iv | JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE ACRONYMS (J)ASDF (Japan) Air Self-Defense Force (J)GSDF (Japan) Ground Self-Defense Force (J)MSDF (Japan) Maritime Self-Defense Force (J)SDF (Japan) Self-Defense Force ACSA Acquisition and Cross-Service Agreement AFB Air Force Base ASO Air Staff Office BMD Ballistic Missile Defense CENTCOM Central Command CIC Cabinet Intelligence Council CIRO Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office CRF Central Readiness Force CSICE Cabinet Satellite Intelligence Center DCI Director of Cabinet Intelligence DIH Defense Intelligence Headquarters DIO Defense Intelligence Officer DPJ Democratic Party of Japan DPRI Defense Posture Review Initiative GHQ General Headquarters GPR Global Posture Review GSO Ground Staff Office HUMINT Human intelligence IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IGS Information-gathering satellite ISAF International Stabilization Force JCG Japan Coast Guard JDA Japan Defense Agency (now MOD) JIC Joint Intelligence Council JMA Japan Meteorological Agency LDP Liberal Democratic Party (Japan) MAP Military Assistance Program METI Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry MITI Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Now METI) MLIT Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism MOD Ministry of Defense MOF Ministry of Finance MOFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MSA Maritime Safety Agency MSO Maritime Staff Office MTDP Mid-Term Defense Program NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NDPG National Defense Program Guideline NDPO National Defense Program Outline NPA National Police Agency NPT Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty NSC National Security Council OEF Operation Enduring Freedom YUKI TATSUMI | v OIP Operation Iraq Freedom PCO Provincial Cooperation Office PLA People's Liberation Army (China) PLAAF PLA Air Force PLAN PLA Navy PLO Provincial Liaison Office PKO Peace-Keeping Operations PMO Prime Minister’s Office PPH Prefectural police headquarters PPSC Prefectural Public Safety Commission P-REX Police Team Rescue Units PRTs Provincial Reconstruction Teams PSI Proliferation Security Initiative PSIA Public Security Investigation Agency RPBs Regional Police Bureaus SAM Surface-to-air missile SCAP Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers SCC Security Consultative Committee SIGINT Signal intelligence SOFA Status of Forces Agreement TMD Theater Missile Defense TMD-WG Theater Missile Defense-Working Group TMPD Tokyo Metropolitan Police Department UN United Nations UNMIS UN Mission in Sudan WMD Weapons of Mass Destruction vi | JAPAN’S NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE PREFAC E Dear Colleagues, It is with pleasure that I present Japan’s National Security Policy Infrastructure: Can Tokyo Meet Washington’s Expectation? by Yuki Tatsumi, Senior Associate at the Stimson Center. This is the latest volume in a series of works on Japan and its critical security alliance with the United States. In an era when we are focused on the rise of Asian powers and the realignment of geopolitical relationships in Asia, it is important to not lose sight of the central role that Japan, the most advanced economy in Asia, continues to play. From deployments in the Indian Ocean in support of coalition operations in Afghanistan and Iraq to an attempt to enhance the decision-making capability of the country’s leadership, Japan’s national security policies and practices have been trying to respond and adapt to new 21st century missions, after decades of self-imposed constraints on Japan’s external engagements. Ms. Tatsumi’s new book is a unique contribution to our understanding of Japan’s security policy community. It examines the core realities of how security policies are formulated and presented to decision-makers, and implemented once political choices are made. Ms. Tatsumi examines systematically all the key players in the Japanese system: the civilian agencies, the military services, the intelligence community, as well as the legal factors, including the prospects for constitutional reform. Her book concludes with important reflections on how the United States perceives these changes in Japan’s security community, and whether mutual expectations in this key alliance relationship are satisfied. The Stimson Center expresses special thanks to Allan Y. Song and the Smith Richardson Foundation for their support to this project. We hope that this volume will contribute to greater knowledge of Japan and its changing security community, in the interests of devising effective policies that promote peace in the vital East Asian region. Sincerely, Ellen Laipson President and CEO YUKI TATSUMI | vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, my deepest gratitude goes to the Smith Richardson Foundation for their generous support for my work. In particular, I am thankful that Allan Y. Song, the Foundation’s senior program officer, had faith in me to support my project idea throughout the project period. I also would not have been able to complete this book without the professionally nurturing environment at the Henry L. Stimson Center. I thank Ellen Laipson and Cheryl Ramp for supporting me with my efforts at the Center to develop its Japan program; Jane Dorsey and Alison Yost deserve enormous credit for providing valuable assistance at the final stage of the project. I also owe Junko Kobayashi special acknowledgement for helping me write a proposal that launched this project. And I am extremely grateful for Alan D. Romberg, Distinguished Fellow and Director of the Center’s East Asia Program, for allowing me to pursue my own analytical interests. The Japan project interns— Aaron Young, Arthur Lord, Brian Clampitt, and Leslie Forgach—for spending endless hours proofreading my manuscript must be thanked for their efforts. In particular, Brian and Leslie have my respect for spending hours reading through my chapter drafts, helping to shape it into a publishable manuscript. I can never thank enough those in the government, militaries, and academia in both the United States and Japan whom I have had the privilege to call my mentors. Throughout the project, they shared their insights with me in a way that I could not have hoped otherwise. I am particularly grateful to Masahiro Akiyama, Rust M. Deming, Michael J. Green, Mike M. Mochizuki, Andrew L. Oros, James J. Przystup, Robin “Sak” Sakoda, Nicholas Szechenyi, and Akihiko Tanaka for providing constructive criticism to improve my work. Finally, my deep personal gratitude goes to Hideaki. As always, he was a master at keeping me in good spirit even through my thickest writer’s blocks. I can never thank him enough for his confidence in me and support for my work. Yuki Tatsumi Senior Associate, East Asia Program November 2008 YUKI TATSUMI | 8 YUKI TATSUMI | 1 — INTRODUCTION — hen I began to work on my first edited volume, Japan’s New Defense WEstablishment: Institutions, Capabilities and Implications, in January 2005, expectations had been rising among policymakers in the United States that Japan would be a more engaging actor in international security affairs. Japan, following the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001, had made several unprecedented decisions under then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi. First, Japan decided to dispatch Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) vessels for a refueling mission in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) in November 2001. Then, in March 2002, it dispatch Ground Self-Defense Force (JGSDF) troops to East Timor. Finally, in November 2003, Japan dispatched the Air Self-Defense Force (JASDF) to Kuwait to provide transport support
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tanaka Makiko: Scharfzüngige Populistin Oder Populäre Reformerin?
    DUISBURGER ARBEITSPAPIERE OSTASIENWISSENSCHAFTEN DUISBURG WORKING PAPERS ON EAST ASIAN STUDIES No. 67/2006 Tanaka Makiko: Scharfzüngige Populistin oder populäre Reformerin? Momoyo Hüstebeck Institut für Ostasienwissenschaften (Institute of East Asian Studies) Universität Duisburg-Essen/ Campus Duisburg D-47048 Duisburg, Germany Tel.: +49-203-379-4191 Fax: +49-203-379-4157 E-Mail: [email protected] © by the author August 2006 Titel/Title: Tanaka Makiko: Scharfzüngige Populistin oder populäre Reformerin? Autor/Author : Momoyo Hüstebeck Series/Reihe Duisburg Working Papers on East Asian Studies, No. 67/2006 Duisburger Arbeitspapiere Ostasienwissenschaften, Nr. 67/2006 Zusammenfassung/Abstract: Tanaka Makiko, Tochter des wegen seiner Plutokratie und jedoch auch seiner hohen Popularität legendären Premierministers Tanaka Kakuei (Amtszeit 1972-1974), gehört zu einer der populärsten Erbabgeordneten in Japan. Obwohl Japan als konsolidierte Demokratie erachtet wird, wird der Anteil der Abgeordneten der regierenden Liberal Demokratischen Partei (LDP), die ihren Sitz „vererbt“ bekommen haben, auf etwa vierzig Prozent geschätzt. Tanaka entwickelte jedoch anders als ein großer Teil dieser Politiker mit dynastischer Herkunft ein eigenes politisches Profil. Ihre scharfzüngige Kritik an den verkrusteten Strukturen der LDP erwies sich für ihre schnelle politische Karriere nicht als hinderlich. 2001 wurde sie aufgrund ihrer hohen Popularität und ihrem Image als Reformerin zur ersten Außenministerin Japans ernannt. Als Frau sollte sie frischen Wind sowohl in ihre konservative Partei als auch in das skandalgebeultete Außenministerium bringen. Ihre Amtszeit endete jedoch bereits nach nur zehn Monaten, während denen Bürokraten und ihre politischen Gegner alles daran setzten, sie zu demontieren. Tanaka Makiko, the daughter of the popular former prime minister Tanaka Kakuei - in office from 1972-1974 and who resigned amidst one of the worst corruption scandals in post-war Japan - is among the most popular second generation politicians in the country today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management
    e Fukushima Nuclearand Crisis Accident Management e Fukushima The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Crisis Management — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. Alliance Cooperation — — Lessons for Japan-U.S. September, 2012 e Sasakawa Peace Foundation Foreword This report is the culmination of a research project titled ”Assessment: Japan-US Response to the Fukushima Crisis,” which the Sasakawa Peace Foundation launched in July 2011. The accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant that resulted from the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011, involved the dispersion and spread of radioactive materials, and thus from both the political and economic perspectives, the accident became not only an issue for Japan itself but also an issue requiring international crisis management. Because nuclear plants can become the target of nuclear terrorism, problems related to such facilities are directly connected to security issues. However, the policymaking of the Japanese government and Japan-US coordination in response to the Fukushima crisis was not implemented smoothly. This research project was premised upon the belief that it is extremely important for the future of the Japan-US relationship to draw lessons from the recent crisis and use that to deepen bilateral cooperation. The objective of this project was thus to review and analyze the lessons that can be drawn from US and Japanese responses to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, and on the basis of these assessments, to contribute to enhancing the Japan-US alliance’s nuclear crisis management capabilities, including its ability to respond to nuclear terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Download
    VOLUME 1: BORDERS 2018 Published by National Institute of Japanese Literature Tokyo EDITORIAL BOARD Chief Editor IMANISHI Yūichirō Professor Emeritus of the National Institute of Japanese 今西祐一郎 Literature; Representative Researcher Editors KOBAYASHI Kenji Professor at the National Institute of Japanese Literature 小林 健二 SAITō Maori Professor at the National Institute of Japanese Literature 齋藤真麻理 UNNO Keisuke Associate Professor at the National Institute of Japanese 海野 圭介 Literature KOIDA Tomoko Associate Professor at the National Institute of Japanese 恋田 知子 Literature Didier DAVIN Associate Professor at the National Institute of Japanese ディディエ・ダヴァン Literature Kristopher REEVES Associate Professor at the National Institute of Japanese クリストファー・リーブズ Literature ADVISORY BOARD Jean-Noël ROBERT Professor at Collège de France ジャン＝ノエル・ロベール X. Jie YANG Professor at University of Calgary 楊 暁捷 SHIMAZAKI Satoko Associate Professor at University of Southern California 嶋崎 聡子 Michael WATSON Professor at Meiji Gakuin University マイケル・ワトソン ARAKI Hiroshi Professor at International Research Center for Japanese 荒木 浩 Studies Center for Collaborative Research on Pre-modern Texts, National Institute of Japanese Literature (NIJL) National Institutes for the Humanities 10-3 Midori-chō, Tachikawa City, Tokyo 190-0014, Japan Telephone: 81-50-5533-2900 Fax: 81-42-526-8883 e-mail: [email protected] Website: https//www.nijl.ac.jp Copyright 2018 by National Institute of Japanese Literature, all rights reserved. PRINTED IN JAPAN KOMIYAMA PRINTING CO., TOKYO CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Short Bio of Hon. Akihisa NAGASHIMA Akihisa Nagashima Is a Fifth-Term
    Short bio of Hon. Akihisa NAGASHIMA Akihisa Nagashima is a fifth-term member of the House of Representatives with the Akihisa Nagashima is a fourth-term member of the House of Representatives with the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He currently serves as the Shadow Minister for Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). He currently serves as ranking member of the Foreign Affairs of the DPJ’s Next Cabinet and a member of the House Committee on House Committee on National Security. He has also been teaching public policy at the Foreign Affairs and a member of the House Special Committee on Promotion of Science Chuo University and Keio University Graduate School as a Visiting Professor since and Technology, and Innovation. He has also been teaching public policy at the Chuo 2002. He previously served as Senior Vice Minister of Defense in the Noda Cabinet in University Graduate School as a Visiting Professor since 2002. He previously served as 2012. He also served as Special Advisor to the Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda for Senior Vice Minister of Defense in the Noda Cabinet in 2012. He also served as Special Advisor to the Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda for Foreign Affairs and National Security Foreign Affairs and National Security in 2011-12, and Parliamentary Vice-Minister of in 2011-12, and Parliamentary Vice-Minister of Defense in the Hatoyama and the Defense in the Hatoyama and the following Kan Cabinets in 2009-10. Before serving following Kan Cabinets in 2009-10. Before serving in the administration, he was rank- in the administration, he was ranking member of the House Committee on National ing member of the House Committee on National Security, 2005-06; Committee on Security, 2005-06; Committee on Foreign Affairs, 2006-07 and 2010-11; and Special Foreign Affairs, 2006-07 and 2010-11; and Special Committee on Anti-Piracy and Committee on Anti-Piracy and International Terrorism, 2008-09.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Democracy in Japan: the Parliamentary Cabinet System Since 1868
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Kentucky University of Kentucky UKnowledge Asian Studies Race, Ethnicity, and Post-Colonial Studies 5-15-2014 Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Georgia Institute of Technology Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Woodall, Brian, "Growing Democracy in Japan: The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868" (2014). Asian Studies. 4. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_asian_studies/4 Growing Democracy in Japan Growing Democracy in Japan The Parliamentary Cabinet System since 1868 Brian Woodall Due to variations in the technical specifications of different electronic reading devices, some elements of this ebook may not appear as they do in the print edition. Readers are encouraged to experiment with user settings for optimum results. Copyright © 2014 by The University Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Woodall, Brian.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Insolvency Proceedings for Systemically Important Financial Institutions
    INTERNATIONAL INSOLVENCY INSTITUTE Twelfth Annual International Insolvency Conference Supreme Court of France Paris, France SHOWCASE PRESENTATION: PLANNING FOR FAILURE: USE OF INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS FOR SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Overview Of The Japanese Legal Framework To Resolve A Systemically Important Financial Institution In Insolvency Proceedings In Japan By Hideyuki Sakai Bingham McCutchen Murase Sakai Mimura Tokyo June 21-22, 2012 ©International Insolvency Institute 2012. All rights reserved. Admin*1656557.1 OVERVIEW OF THE JAPANESE LEGAL FRAMEWORK TO RESOLVE A SYSTEMICALLY IMPORTANT FINANCIAL INSTITUTION IN INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN JAPAN May 28, 2012 Hideyuki Sakai [email protected] Tokyo Tel: +81-3-6721-3131 (Direct) Introduction This article is intended to provide an overview of the Japanese legal framework within which the resolution of a systemically important financial institution would occur in Japan. While Japan has a well-established scheme of insolvency laws, there have been few insolvencies of Japanese regulated financial institutions in the past decade. In addition, Japanese courts have considerable latitude in administering insolvency proceedings and rendering decisions. The combination of these factors makes it difficult to predict with certainty the mechanisms for implementing a proposed resolution. International Context Japan is a member of the Group of Twenty (“G20”) and the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”). As such, Japan’s leaders have committed to pursue financial stability, implement international financial standards and undergo periodic peer reviews.1 On November 4, 2011, three Japanese financial institutions were named in the initial group of twenty-nine globally systemically important financial institutions (“G-SIFIs”) identified by the FSB and the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (“BCBS”).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Innovation As a National Strategy
    Medical Innovation as a National Strategy March 18, 2013 Hideaki Nakagaki Deputy Director‐General, Office of Healthcare Policy Cabinet Secretariat Provisional Translation 1 Establishment of Office of Healthcare Policy On February 22, 2013, the government established an Office of Healthcare Policy within the Cabinet Secretariat as part of concerted Government efforts to implement a growth strategy for Japan. The office aims to establish Japan as a nation that boasts of the most advanced medical technologies and healthcare services in the world, which is expected to result in Japan being the country with the longest healthy life expectancy. Given these achievements, the Office also aims to develop the medical sector, pharmaceutical products and medical devices and equipment as strategic industries that will form a key pillar for Japan's economic revitalization. 2 Structure of the Office for Healthcare Policy As of March 18, 2013 Chief Cabinet Secretary (Yoshihide SUGA ) Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary (Katsunobu Kato and Hiroshige Seko) Director-General：Special Advisor to the Prime Minister (Hiroto Izumi) Deputy Director General： Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Nakagaki, MHLW) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Morimoto, MEXT) Councilor, Cabinet Secretariat (Miyamoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Akuzawa, MoF) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat(Fujimoto, METI) Counselor, Cabinet Secretariat (Saruta, MHLW) Director Director (Private sector： Director Director Director Director (Private sector： (Private sector： (MEXT) FIRM*) (MHLW) (Private
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtable Seeking Stability: Japan’S Relations in Northeast Asia Under Shinzo Abe
    asia policy, volume 14, number 1 (january 2019), 145–76 • http://asiapolicy.nbr.org • roundtable Seeking Stability: Japan’s Relations in Northeast Asia under Shinzo Abe James D.J. Brown Shin Kawashima June Teufel Dreyer Yoshihide Soeya Tomohiko Taniguchi © The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle, Washington asia policy Introduction ortheast Asia is one of the world’s most complex security Nenvironments—a region home to three nuclear weapons states, great-power rivalry, multiple territorial conflicts, and long historical memories. In this environment, Japan must deftly navigate its relations with its neighbors against a backdrop of growing uncertainties about the international order. Under Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s leadership, the country has taken unprecedented steps toward “normalizing” its international posture, introduced a new “free and open Indo-Pacific” strategy, bolstered its defenses, and strengthened relations with its ally and security guarantor, the United States. At the same time, Japan has assumed a new leadership role in regional economic and diplomatic initiatives, such as bringing the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership to fruition following U.S. withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement. This Asia Policy roundtable takes stock of Japan’s current political and economic relations with its Northeast Asian neighbors and the United States. Focusing on Japan’s relations with Russia, China, Taiwan, the two Koreas, and the United States, the essays assess Tokyo’s priorities and policies and note salient issues to watch in each bilateral relationship over the next two to three years. Since returning to power in December 2012, Abe has sparked new momentum in Japan’s relations with Russia and has committed to resolving the territorial dispute over the Northern Territories/Kuril Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Abduction of Japanese People by North Korea And
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Ritsumeikan Research Repository THE ABDUCTION OF JAPANESE PEOPLE BY NORTH KOREA AND THE DYNAMICS OF JAPANESE DOMESTIC POLITICS AND FOREIGN POLICY: CASE STUDIES OF SHIN KANEMARU AND JUNICHIRO KOIZUMI’S PYONGYANG SUMMIT MEETINGS IN 1990, 2002 AND 2004’S PYONGYANG SUMMIT MEETINGS by PARK Seohee 51114605 March 2017 Master’s Thesis / Independent Final Report Presented to Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Asia Pacific Studies ACKNOLEGEMENTS First and foremost, I praise and thank my Lord, who gives me the opportunity and talent to accomplish this research. You gave me the power to trust in my passion and pursue my dreams. I could never have done this without the faith I have in You, the Almighty. I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Yoichiro Sato for your excellent support and guidance. You gave me the will to carry on and never give up in any hardship. Under your great supervision, this work came into existence. Again, I am so grateful for your trust, informative advice, and encouragement. I am deeply thankful and honored to my loving family. My two Mr. Parks and Mrs. Keum for your support, love and trust. Every moment of every day, I thank our Lord Almighty for giving me such a wonderful family. I would like to express my gratitude to Rotary Yoneyama Memorial Foundation, particularly to Mrs. Toshiko Takahashi (and her family), Kunisaki Club, Mr. Minoru Akiyoshi and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/20/2018 4:50:45 PM J OMB No
    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 07/20/2018 4:50:45 PM J OMB No. 1124-0006; Expires May 31, 2020 U.S. Department of Justice Exhibit A to Registration Statement Washington, dc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended INSTRUCTIONS. Furnish this exhibit for EACH foreign principal listed in an initial statement and for EACH additional foreign principal acquired subsequently. The filing of this document requires the payment of a filing fee as set forth in Rule (d)(1), 28 C.F.R. § 5.5(d)(1). Compliance is accomplished by filing an electronic Exhibit A form at https://www.fara.gov. Privacy Act Statement. The filing of this document is required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq., for the purposes of registration under the Act and public disclosure. Provision of the information requested is mandatory, and failure to provide this information is subject to the penalty and enforcement provisions established in Section 8 of the Act. Every registration statement, short form , registration statement, supplemental statement, exhibit, amendment, copy of informational materials or other document or information filed with the Attorney General under this Act is a public record open to public examination, inspection and copying during the posted business hours of the Registration Unit in Washington, DC. Statements, are also available online at the Registration Unit’s webpage: https://www.fara.gov. One copy of every such document, other than informational materials, is automatically provided to the Secretary of State pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, and copies of any and all documents are routinely made available to other agencies, departments and Congress pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Program for Promoting Japan As an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment Into Japan
    Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Office of FDI Promotion, Cabinet Office Program for Promoting Japan as an １ Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan Growth of foreign direct investment to Japan In December 2011, the Government of Japan formulated the “Program for Promoting Japan as an Asian Business Center and Direct Investment into Japan” consisting of policy measures to create an attractive, world-class business and living environment. The “New Growth Strategy” (June 2010, Cabinet decision) and the “Interim Report on Strategies to Revitalize Japan” (August 2011, Cabinet decision) requested the Government to formulate this Program. The Program was determined by the Interagency Parliamentary Secretary Meeting chaired by Hiroshi Ogushi, Parliamentary Secretary of the Cabinet Office. ＜1st stage＞ ＜2nd stage＞ Doubling FDI stock Doubling FDI to GDP from 2001 to 2006 ratio to around 5% by 2010 ２ Three Targets of The Program The Program sets out three targets that are to be achieved by 2020. 1) To Increase the Number of High Value-Added Sites The aim is to increase the number of high value-added sites (Asia Regional Headquarters and research and development facilities) by 30 sites each year by attracting FDI. As of the end of FY2009, there were approximately 500 high value-added sites in Japan. 2) To Double the Number of Employees of Foreign Enterprises The aim is to increase the number of employees of foreign enterprises (defined as those which have more than one-third ratio of foreign ownership) to 2,000,000 by FY2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Administrative Organization in Japan
    Appendix 2 THE NATIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION IN JAPAN 1. The Outline of National Administrative Organization National administration is uniformly carried out by the Cabinet and the organizations under the cabinet. The Cabinet, Ministries, Agencies and Incorporated Administrative Agencies (IAAs), etc. function as one organization, at the top of which exists the Cabinet. It is responsible for all the activities of State except legislative and judicial ones. Consequently it is natural that these organizations which take care of national administration should be systematically organized under the Cabinet. As of 2019, the Cabinet Office, 11 Ministries, and the Reconstruction Agency are under the Cabinet. They are national administrative organizations in the proper sense of terms. However, not all the areas of State activities are covered by these Ministries. Incorporated Administrative Agencies and Public Corporations also cover other parts of the activities. One of their purposes is accomplishing enough efficiency and effectiveness in their business with autonomy and legal personalities separated from State.To necessary extent, they are subject to various controls by their competent Ministers. The former, for which more general rules are prepared, amount 87 as of October 1, 2019. Some of them are regarded the same as government offices in terms of quality of their roles, to which are applied statutes concerned. Public Corporations, which now amount 33 as of the same date, are enterprises dealing with different quality business from IAAs. They must be regulated by individual acts of rules, not common rules, unlike IAAs. Thus we can see some types of organizations following policy process from planning to implementation.
    [Show full text]