ADDRESS: Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge Case Officer: Rozina Vrlic Application Number:18/01995/EIAFUL Vauxhall Bridge (Application 1) - Master Copy Lambeth Bridge (Application 2) 18/01993/EIAFUL Westminster Bridge (Application 3) 18/01991/EIAFUL Golden Jubilee Bridge (Application 4) 18/01990/EIAFUL Waterloo Bridge (Application 5) 18/01988/EIAFUL Ward: Oval (Vauxhall Bridge) Date Received: 08/05/2018 Proposal: The architectural illumination, as part of the Illuminated River proposal, of Vauxhall Bridge including the installation of fixtures, fittings and ancillary equipment and associated works.

The application is an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development and is accompanied by an Environmental Statement (ES).

Drawing numbers: Vauxhall Bridge (18/01995/EIAFUL) 1028_04_VA SK0457; 1028_04_VA SK0458; 1028_04_VA SK0459; 1028_04_VA P016; 1028_04_VA P1001; 1028_04_VA P2001; 1028_04_VA P2002; 1028_04_VA P2003; 1028_04_VA P2008; 1028_04_VA P2009; 1028_04_VA X0101 rev A; 1028_04_VA 0102; X0161 rev A

Documents: Vauxhall Bridge (18/01995/EIAFUL) Planning Statement – Vauxhall Bridge, dated May 2018; Project Overview Design Statement, ref: 1028doc114, dated May 2018; 04_Vauxhall Bridge Design Statement, ref: 1028doc114, dated May 2018; Statement of Community Engagement, dated May 2018.

Environmental Statement – Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary, dated May 2018; Environmental Statement – Volume 2: Main Text, dated May 2018; Environmental Statement – Volume 3: Heritage, Townscape and Visual Impact Assessment, dated May 2018, prepared by Montagu Evans; Environmental Statement - Volume 4: Technical Appendices, dated May 2018; Environmental Statement – Volume 5: Annexes, dated May 2018; All prepared by Temple.

RECOMMENDATION: I. Resolve to approve the Planning Application, subject to conditions. II. Agree to delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Development to:

a. Finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report

Associated Application: Listed Building Consent(s) Application Number: Vauxhall Bridge (Application 1) - Master Copy: 18/01996/LB Lambeth Bridge (Application 2) 18/01994/LB Westminster Bridge (Application 3) 18/01992/LB Waterloo Bridge (Application 5) 18/01989/LB

Proposal: The architectural illumination, as part of the Illuminated River proposal, of Waterloo Bridge, including the installation of fixtures, fittings and ancillary equipment and associated works. Drawing numbers: Vauxhall Bridge (18/01996/LB) 1028_04_VA SK0457; 1028_04_VA SK0458; 1028_04_VA SK0459; 1028_04_VA P016; 1028_04_VA P1001; 1028_04_VA P2001; 1028_04_VA P2002; 1028_04_VA P2003; 1028_04_VA P2008; 1028_04_VA P2009; 1028_04_VA X0101 rev A; 1028_04_VA 0102; X0161 rev A

Documents: Vauxhall Bridge (18/01996/LB) Planning Statement – Vauxhall Bridge, dated May 2018; Project Overview Design Statement, ref: 1028doc114, dated May 2018; 04_Vauxhall Bridge Design Statement, ref: 1028doc114, dated May 2018; Statement of Community Engagement, dated May 2018. Environmental Statement – Volume 3: Heritage, Townscape and Visual Impact Assessment, dated May 2018, prepared by Montagu Evans, Temple.

RECOMMENDATION:

I. Resolve to grant Listed Building Consent, subject to conditions. II. Agree to delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Development to:

a. Finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report

Applicant: Illuminated River Foundation Agent: Montagu-Evans

SITE DESIGNATIONS

Bridge Designation Listed Conservation Protected Local View Other Structure Area Vista Vauxhall Grade II* Albert County Hall; Vauxhall, Nine Elms Bridge - Embankment Millbank; Brixton and Battersea Conservation Panoramic local Opportunity Area; Area (CA57) view Central Activities Zone; flood risk zone 2/3; Thames Policy Area; TfL Road Network; Site of Metropolitan Nature Conservation importance; Heliport Safeguarding Zone (Helipad 150m Zone); Air Quality focus Area. Lambeth Grade II* Albert Parliament Brixton Rooftop Vauxhall, Nine Elms Bridge Embankment Hill Summit view; County Hall; and Battersea Conservation to Palace of Victoria Tower Opportunity Area; Area (CA57) Westminster; Gardens/Members Central Activities Parliament Terrace; Brixton Zone; flood risk zone square to Panoramic local 2/3; Thames Policy Palace of view Area; TfL Road Westminster; Network; Site of Metropolitan Nature Parliament Conservation Hill Oak Tree importance; to Palace of Westminster;

Primrose Hill to Palace of Westminster Westminster Grade II* part Albert County Hall; Waterloo Opportunity Bridge Embankment Norwood Park; Area; Central Conservation Queen Elizabeth Activities Zone; flood Area (CA57) Hall; Royal risk zone 2/3; and part Festival Hall; Thames Policy Area; South Bank Brixton Panoramic TfL Road Network Conservation local view Site of Metropolitan Area (CA 38) Nature Conservation importance; Golden South Bank King Henrys County Hall; Waterloo Opportunity Jubilee Conservation Mound to St Norwood Park; Area; Central Footbridge Area (CA 38) Pauls Queen Elizabeth Activities Zone; flood Cathedral, Hall; Royal risk zone 2/3; Festival Hall; Thames Policy Area; Brixton Panoramic Site of Metropolitan local view Nature Conservation importance; Waterloo Grade II* Albert Norwood Park; Waterloo Opportunity Bridge Embankment Queen Elizabeth Area; Central . Conservation Hall; Royal Activities Zone; flood Area (CA57) Festival Hall; risk zone 2/3; Brixton Panoramic Thames Policy Area; local view TfL Road network; Site of Metropolitan Nature Conservation importance;

LAND USE DETAILS

Bridge Owned/Maintained Total Site HA Area within Area within (sqm) Lambeth HA other LPA (sqm) (Westminster Council) HA(sqm) Vauxhall Bridge TFL maintained and 1.0399 (10,399) 0.5812 (5,812) 0.4587 ownership (4,587) Lambeth Bridge TFL owned and 0.8581 (8,581) 0.3936 (3,936) 0.4645 maintained (4,645) Westminster TFL owned and 1.0420 (10,420) 0.4923 (4,923) 0.5497 Bridge maintained (5,497) Golden Jubilee Owned by 1.5194 (15,194) 0.8367 (8,367) 0.6827(6,827) Westminster City Council and Lambeth Council. Westminster maintain this bridge and invoice Lambeth Council (50% of the total maintenance cost) Waterloo Bridge Owned by 1.4888 (14,888) 0.8002 (8,002) 0.6886 Westminster City (6,886) Council. However, part of the structure is maintained by Lambeth and Tfl. Mainly pedestrian subways.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Project Overview The application seeks permission for the illumination of Vauxhall Bridge as part of the wider illumination of 15 central London bridges (from Albert Bridge to Tower Bridge), across the River Thames known as the Illuminated River project. Five of the Bridges (Vauxhall Bridge; Lambeth Bridge; Westminster Bridge; Golden Jubilee and Waterloo Bridge) are located with the London borough of Lambeth. Once complete it will be the longest public art commission in the world at 2.5 miles in length, along 4.5 nautical miles of the River Thames.

Illuminated River, by artist Leo Villareal, is a public artwork that will provide a unified kinetic light installation across the 15 bridges. The illumination will be kinetic with subtle changes in the colour and intensity of light. Digital control of the luminaries will allow abstract sequences to actively define the forms of the bridge creating a non-repetitive and unique pattern. The lighting design is specific to each bridge respecting and revealing their distinctive histories and architectural features. Whilst each bridge will be lit differently, the artwork will be designed to unify the 15 bridges.

The proposed illumination is intended to:

 Create a unified vision to celebrate London's bridges and the city's historic links with the river;  Use more energy efficient fittings than existing decorative lighting on the bridges;  Contribute to a more ecologically sustainable environment for the river;  Increase public understanding of the context of the bridges and the river environment; and  Provide more opportunities to enjoy the environs of the river.

The Applicant, the Illuminated River Foundation, is an independent charity set up to lead the project. Apart from an initial investment and start-up from the Olympic Reserve towards the costs of the initial competition of £250,000, it is funded through philanthropic sources. . The assumed phasing, submitted with the application, places the bridges in the following phases:

Phase 1 - London Bridge, Cannon Street Railway Bridge, Southwark Bridge, Millennium Bridge. Phase 2 - Blackfriars Railway Bridge, Blackfriars Road Bridge, Golden Jubilee Footbridges, Waterloo Bridge. Phase 3 - Westminster Bridge, Lambeth Bridge, Vauxhall Bridge Phase 4 - Grosvenor Bridge, Chelsea Bridge Phase 5 - Tower Bridge, Albert Bridge

It is expected that all bridges will be illuminated by 2023. Works on each bridge are not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks, with an additional four week commission period.

This report is the ‘master’ report (Vauxhall Bridge (Application 1) - Master Copy: 18/01995/EIAFUL and 18/01996/LB) which will set out all the background and which will have sections on each bridge individually, as well as discussing the impact across all 5 bridges. The remaining reports (for the other 4 bridges - Lambeth Bridge (Application 2): 18/01993/EIAFUL and 18/01994/LB; Westminster Bridge (Application 3): 18/01991/EIAFUL and 18/01992/LB; Golden Jubilee Bridge (Application 4):18/01990/EIAFUL; Waterloo Bridge (Application 5): 18/01988/EIAFUL and 18/01989/LB) cross-refer to the relevant paragraphs of this ‘master’ report, and will serve simply as a means of cross-referencing where in the ‘master’ report the relevant material is located, including where the particular bridge in each case is discussed. It will set out the relevant recommendation for planning permission listed building consent as appropriate.

The proposal is considered to be a high quality piece of art in an appropriate location. The lighting scheme seeks to enhance an appreciation of the character and significance of each bridge and deliver public art in recognition of the bridges as landmarks, but which is also sensitive, acknowledging the place of them in the context of wider element of cultural landmarks on the Thames in views which have been identified as important to London's character strategically. It is considered that the proposal would accord with policies Q4, Q24 and ED11 of the Local Plan.

In relation to the historic environment, it is considered that the proposed lighting schemes have been designed to ensure visual sensitivity, discreetly integrating lighting into an overall design. It is considered, that the lighting has been designed so as to preserve the special architectural and historic interest and significance of the listed bridges and not harm the setting of designated heritage assets in accordance with section 16 and 66 of the Town Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, policies in the NPPF, London Plan Policy 7.8, Local Plan Policies, Q19, Q20, Q21 and Q22.

In relation to amenity, subject to conditions, the proposal would not have a significant detrimental impact on amenity and accords with Local Plan policy Q2.

Any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be phased and short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning. Subject to conditions the proposal would have minimal potential traffic and transport effects during installation. In terms of river traffic it is considered that subject to conditions the impacts on the river and river users would be acceptable and accord with Policy T6 and T5.

In relation to ecology and biodiversity, subject to conditions, the proposal would have a negligible impact on ecology and biodiversity and accords with Local Plan policy EN1.

In relation to sustainability and waste, it is considered that careful consideration has been given to the design of the scheme such that it would comply with Local Plan policy EN4.

With regards to the Environmental Statement there is sufficient information to reliably inform decision making on the planning applications.

Officers have assessed the proposals in relation to national, strategic and local policies contained within the NPPF, London Plan and the Lambeth Local Plan and the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions. OFFICERS REPORT Reason for referral to PAC: The applications are reported to the Planning Applications Committee in accordance with (3) Applications which the Assistant Director of Planning and Development wishes to refer to the committee. 1 SITES AND SURROUNDINGS

1.1 Each application boundary also falls within the administrative area of Westminster City Council and each are therefore classed as a "cross boundary application".

1.2 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge

1.3 Vauxhall Bridge is a steel and granite arch bridge structure, five steel arches built on intermediate supports. At the north bank is Pimlico, with Vauxhall on the south bank. The bridge carries the A202 road across the Thames and is used by vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians. The bridge is approximately 247m in length and 24m wide.

1.4 The south bank either side of Vauxhall Bridge is predominately developed with both commercial and residential buildings, including the MI6 building to the east and St George Wharf Tower and Riverwalk residential building to the west.

1.5 The north bank is developed with both commercial and residential buildings on either side of the bridge.

1.6 There are bronze statues of allegorical figures attached to each of the bridge’s eight piers. The four upstream are of Agriculture, Architecture, Engineering and Pottery. The four statutes downstream are of Education, Fine Art, Science and Government. These statues form an important element of the bridge’s listing.

1.7 In terms of existing bridge lighting, Vauxhall Bridge only has functional road lighting. The bridge sits within a wide range of luminance, from the higher levels on the south bank to the lower levels on the north bank.

1.8 Existing View of Vauxhall Bridge day and night (Source: Vauxhall Bridge Design Statement)

1.9 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge

1.10 Lambeth Bridge is a five span steel arch bridge structure granite-faced, reinforced concrete piers. The bridge carries three road traffic lanes and one cycle lane between two pedestrian walkways separated from the roadway by security fences. The bridge is approximately 236.5m in length and 18.3m wide.

1.11 Lambeth Palace is located to the south of the bridge along the east bank, and sits behind Lambeth Palace Road. The west side of the south bank is predominately developed with residential and commercial buildings along Albert Embankment, including the International Maritime Organisation and Lambeth Fire Station.

1.12 The north bank is predominately developed with commercial properties, including MI5, Millbank Tower. Victoria Tower Gardens South is a public park to the east of the north bank. The north bank on both sides of the bridge are heavily tree lined.

1.13 The bridge has historic interest as part of the continuum of river crossings where Londoners have been traversing the Thames since the 13th century, and architectural interest as a result of its appearance and form. The bridge is painted in a red colour scheme to match the colour of the seating in the House of Lords, which is in the southern end of the Palace of Westminster. 1.14 In terms of bridge lighting Lambeth Bridge only has functional road lighting. Lambeth Bridge is set against a relatively low luminance background. The buildings on the Albert Embankment to the south are relatively low luminance with some tree cover on the bank side. On the north bank, there is a line of trees within the adjacent parks which create a dark band.

1.15 Existing View of Lambeth Bridge day/night (Source: Lambeth Bridge Design Statement)

1.16 Application 3: Westminster Bridge 1.17 Westminster Bridge’s structure has seven elliptical cast iron arches interrupted by granite piers. The bridge carries four lanes of road traffic with two cycle lanes and two pedestrian walkways. The bridge is approximately 252 m in length and 26 m wide.

1.18 The south bank is predominately developed with commercial buildings including County Hall and the London Eye to the east, and St Thomas’ Hospital and gardens to the west. The south bank in front of St Thomas’ Hospital is tree lined.

1.19 The east side of the north bank is heavily developed with commercial properties including Westminster Station and New Scotland Yard. The Palace of Westminster World Heritage Site is located immediately to the west of the north bank.

1.20 The special interest of the bridge lies in its historic and architectural value as a surviving Victorian gothic bridge. It is painted in a green colour scheme to match the seats in the House of Commons, the part of the Palace of Westminster closest to the Bridge. The bridge forms an important part of the setting of the Palace of Westminster World Heritage Site.

1.21 The bridge is currently lit with roadway lantern and white lights on the pavement.

1.22 View of Westminster Bridge day/night (Source: Westminster Bridge Design Statement)

1.23 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Bridge

1.24 The Golden Jubilee Footbridges flank Hungerford Railway Bridge and is non-designated. They are two cable-stayed, pedestrian bridges that share the railway bridge’s foundation piers. The two multi-span cable stayed footbridges are approximately 325m in length and 4m in width.

1.25 Charing Cross railway station and Embankment Station lie immediately to the north of the bridge. Both sides of the north end of the bridge are predominately developed with commercial properties. These properties are set back from the river behind Victoria Embankment Gardens and Whitehall Gardens which run along the banks of the River Thames on either side of the bridge.

1.26 Jubilee Gardens and the London Eye are located to the southwest of the bridge, and the Royal Festival Hall is located to the southeast.

1.27 The Golden Jubilee Footbridges are currently lit from dusk to dawn, however Hungerford Railway Bridge is currently unlit other than navigation lights.

1.28 View of Golden Jubilee Footbridge day/night (Source: Golden Jubilee Footbridge Design Statement)

1.29 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge

1.30 Waterloo Bridge structure is two parallel banks of five arches, tied together with reinforced concrete beams with Portland stone cladding. The bridge carries four road traffic and two cycle lanes between two pedestrian walkways, with the walkways separated from the roadway by security fences. The bridge is approximately 375 m in length and 24 m wide.

1.31 The north bank is predominately developed with commercial buildings including Somerset House. The buildings on the west side of the north bank are separated from the River Thames by Victoria Embankment Gardens which runs along the bank. The banks on both sides of the bridge are tree lined.

1.32 The south bank is predominately developed with residential and commercial buildings, which include Queen Elizabeth Hall, Whitehouse Apartments, the National Theatre and British Film Institute Southbank.

1.33 There is currently a low level of light from the arches that are lit from the existing under arch floodlights. The face of the bridge is unlit.

1.34 View of Waterloo Bridge day/night (Source: Waterloo Bridge Design Statement)

2 PROPOSAL

2.1 Planning permission and Listed building consent is sought for the architectural illumination, as part of the Illuminated River proposal, of the Application 1:Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application:3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Bridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge, including the installation of fixtures, fittings and ancillary equipment and associated works.

2.2 The proposed development comprises the following principal elements:

 Removal of redundant existing light fixtures and associated equipment as necessary to deliver the proposal;

 Installation of fixtures and fittings including: lighting fixtures and any supports required to attach these to the bridge; cables and cable runs including supports required to attach these to the bridge or provide a route through the bridge; and provision of electrical and network infrastructure to deliver the artwork.

 Illumination of the bridge with the Illuminated River artwork;

 Ancillary and associated development.

2.3 Overview

2.4 Illuminated River, by artist Leo Villareal, is proposed to be a public artwork that will provide a unified kinetic light installation across the 15 bridges. The illumination will be kinetic with subtle changes in the colour and intensity of light. Digital control of the luminaries will allow abstract sequences to actively define the forms of the bridge creating a non-repetitive and unique pattern. The lighting design is specific to each bridge respecting and revealing their distinctive histories and architectural features. Whilst each bridge will be lit differently, the artwork will be designed to unify the 15 bridges.

2.5 Four families of luminaire types will be used across the 15 bridges. This palette of fittings would allow standardisation of details and fixing arrangements as well as rationalising controls, maintenance and replacement. All luminaires will use LED as their light source.

2.6 A combination of the following luminaire types would be used to illuminate the 15 bridges:

2.7 LED Linear Graze

2.8 These fittings are primarily used to graze the vertical faces of the bridges and are typically mounted end to end to create a continuous line of light. A number of variants of this fittings type will be used; where coloured light is called for, an RGBA type will be used which allows a rich palette of colours to be generated by the mixing of red, green, blue and amber light from the LEDs.

2.9 On bridges with monochromatic schemes a tunable white version will be used which will be able to produce white light across the spectrum from cool silvery light to warm golden hues. A lower powered version of the linear fitting is also used where illumination distances are shorter.

2.10 This fitting type is generally used to graze down the face of the bridge and will be mounted at a relatively close offset to the bridge and behind architectural shields to conceal the fittings. The offset distance varies from bridge to bridge, but typically no further than 800mm from the bridge face.

2.11 A number of beam angles and optics will be used to maximise the throw of light onto the face of the bridge. To control and minimise spill light, each of the linear graze fittings will be provided with a custom designed optic shield which will be arranged to cut off as far as practical any light that is not directed onto the bridge face.

2.12

2.13 Led Linear Graze Image (Source: Overview Design Statement)

2.14 LED Floodlights 2.15 LED Floodlights will be used on many of the bridges to light the arches. Some of these will light the underside of arches whether that be concrete such as London Bridge and Waterloo Bridge, or the steel structure of Vauxhall Bridge.

2.16 Where a bridge arch is constructed of an open lattice of steelwork further foodlights will be used to backlight this structure. For lighting the arches two outputs of foodlights will generally be used. The majority of bridges will use a single head, but where a higher output is needed a dual head version will be used.

2.17 A variety of optics and beam angles will be required to suit the differing geometries of the bridges. In addition, louvre attachments will be used to reduce any potential glare from the LED sources.

2.18 In some cases a lower powered Floodlight will be used, for instance to pick out details on the piers and abutments.

2.19 Led Floodlights Image (Source: Overview Design Statement)

2.20 LED Nodes

2.21 LED Nodes

2.22 These individual LED light points are connected in strings to create festoons of lighting. These will be used primarily on Chelsea and Albert Bridges to replicate the existing festoons. The Nodes will use tunable white LED to allow the warmth and intensity of light to be varied.

2.23 Led Nodes Image (Source: Overview Design Statement) 2.24 LED Flex

2.25 Where mounting of a high powered linear fitting is problematic or lower outputs are required, a flexible linear product will be used. The flex houses a continuous LED tape within weatherproof flexible housing which allows the product to be shaped to follow curved structures.

2.26 Led Flex Image (Source: Overview Design Statement)

2.27 In prominent locations it is proposed that the Graze, Node and Floodlight fittings will be painted to a colour in keeping with the colour of the existing bridge structure to minimise their visibility during daylight hours.

2.28 The new lighting would be restricted predominantly to the sides and undersides of the bridges. As the illumination would be restricted to ‘artistic lighting’ it would not alter the existing road, rail or navigational lighting on any of the bridges.

2.29 Wherever possible, existing fittings on the bridges will be used to fix individual luminaries to the bridges. Wherever possible, new fittings will be mounted using clamps and ties which do not require any penetration of the existing structure, including drilling or cutting. In certain locations, it will be necessary to drill new mounting anchors into existing stonework or concrete. These will be repainted after drilling and appropriately sealed by the new fixings, to prevent any increased risk of corrosion of the existing bridge fabric.

2.30 Power will be supplied from the local electrical grid, although for some of the bridges, new electricity supplies will be required.

2.31 In order to create the sequences of light, a computer controlled lighting control system will be used. The lighting for each bridge will be controlled from its own local control system, which will be programmed to allow the bridge artwork to run autonomously.

2.32 A number of power distribution components will be required to realise the art installation for each of the bridges, including:

 A distribution board will be located at the end of each bridge to distribute power to the lighting equipment. The distribution board will be located within the control cabinet.

 Lighting drivers, also known as Power Data Suppliers, merge power and control feeds and deliver them to the LED lighting over a single cable. The drivers will be grouped together in weatherproof enclosures which will be located within the control cabinets.

2.33 Illustration of Power Distribution Board and Power Data Supplier (Source Environmental Statement Vol 2 Chapter 3)

2.34 In terms of controls, each bridge will be provided with a local computer controller which will be the ‘brains’ of its system, controlling the lighting for that bridge. The computer will be loaded with the necessary software to run the sequencing for the bridge. Backup computers will also be provided should the primary one fail.

2.35 These computers will be located within the control cabinets. From the computer, a local Ethernet network will be established using fibre optic cable to distribute the control signals out to a series of network switches located on the bridge. From these, data cabling will be routed to each of the local ‘drivers’ that supply the lighting.

2.36 The drivers for all the luminaires will located in positions affording access for maintenance but concealed from view where possible by the bridge structure. Where practical, drivers will be grouped together to optimise maintainability. Where bridges have existing plant room locations, the control cabinets will be housed in these locations. Where a suitable plant room location is not available, the control cabinets will be located in external feeder pillar enclosures. In some cases, new feeder pillar locations will need to be established.

2.37 The proposed control cabinet location for each bridge located within Lambeth is as follows:

 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge – New feeder pillar on the south bank

 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge – Existing

 Application 3: Westminster Bridge – existing northside plantroom

 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Bridges – New feeder pillar on southside

 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge – Existing northbank plantroom

2.38 Although the bridges will be capable of autonomous control, the intention is to provide a network to inter-link the individual bridge control systems so that this can be controlled as a whole across all 15 bridges.

2.39 A network point will be provided at each bridge into which the local PC can be "plugged in". There are a number of potential options for these network connections, all of which would use the network infrastructure/cabling of existing suppliers (for example BT openreach etc).

2.40 The lighting systems proposed are capable of providing feedback from the light fittings themselves and can provide reports of light fitting failures or faults which can be used by maintenance personnel for both planned maintenance and reactive fault finding. 2.41 The feedback data will be accessible via the local bridge computers but is also anticipated to be accessible from the inter-bridge network so that the lighting systems for the bridges could be monitored remotely with automatic fault alerts.

2.42 In terms of installation and maintenance, equipment that may require regular maintenance is located where pedestrian access is readily achievable without specialised equipment. The access and installation will employ a number of methods such as abseiling, scaffolding, use of suspended platforms, scissor lifts and maintenance cradles dependent on the individual bridge constraints. It is not anticipated that there will be a requirement for any structures in the River Thames to facilitate the installation. It is likely that a number of methods in combination will be required for the installation on each bridge.

2.43 Wherever the design of the bridge permits it, the equipment will be installed by working from the bridge deck. If direct work from the deck surface is possible, this will be done. The operatives will be roped for this work and lookouts will be deployed to ensure that any work that could result in the accidental dropping of an item will not be carried out while a vessel is passing below.

2.44 Works over the edge of the balustrade of a bridge to work on the fascia will be carried out either by using a cherry-picker, by portable hanging platform or by roped access. The bridge footway on the side where a cherry-picker is located will be closed during installation.

2.45 A safety boat will be in attendance during all roped access work. Additionally, when reduction in use of a navigation channel is required, floating fenders or buoys may be deployed to mark the boundaries of the closed channel area.

2.46 Where there is a risk of tools or equipment being accidentally dropped and falling into the river, safety lanyards will be used. Protective packaging for equipment will be removed onshore prior to deployment over the river to avoid the risk of plastic packaging materials falling into the river.

2.47 Equipment will not be submerged in the River Thames at any point during the installation. It is not anticipated that any additional laydown areas outside of the footprint of the bridge will be required during the installation.

2.48 The Applicant intends to use nearby available vacant offices for site office and welfare facilities, if required.

2.49 Some night-time working will be required; where closure of a navigational channel is required, then night-time working will be needed between midnight and 5am. If pavement closures are required, night-time working will be required between 10pm and 5am.

2.50 There are anticipated to be a maximum of between 20 and 40 operatives on each bridge at any one time.

2.51 The proposed hours of illumination are as follows:

2.52 Bridge Light-up Hours (Source Vauxhall Bridge Planning Statement) 2.53 The lighting control system will include integral time-clock functionality to enable lighting to be automatically switched on and off at the predetermined time.

2.54 The delivery of the project would be phased as follows:

 Phase 1 (September to December 2018) the illumination of London Bridge, Cannon Street Railway Bridge, Southwark Bridge and Millennium Bridge.

 Phase 2 (Autumn 2019 to Spring 2020) the illumination of Blackfriars Railway Bridge, Blackfriars Road Bridge, Golden Jubilee Footbridge and Waterloo Bridge.

 Phase 3 (Autumn 2020 to Spring 2021) the illumination of Westminster Bridge, Lambeth Bridge and Vauxhall Bridge.

 Phase 4 (Autumn 2021 to Spring 2022) the illumination of Grosvenor Bridge and Chelsea Bridge.

 Phase 5 (Autumn 2022 – estimated finish date unknown) the illumination of Tower Bridge and Albert Bridge.

2.55 Works on each bridge are not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks, with an additional four-week commission period.

2.56 An explanation of the proposals for each bridge is set out in the following paragraphs of this report:

2.57 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge

2.58 The physical elements of the Proposed Illumination will primarily comprise light fittings, switches, drivers and cables.

2.59 The proposed lighting scheme for Vauxhall Bridge uses a number of luminaire types. New linear LED graze fittings will be mounted across the length of the bridge below balustrade level to illuminate the face of the bridge. Custom made baffles will be mounted on the fittings to control the spread of light and minimise spill into the river.

2.60 On the underside of each arch, two sets of floodlights will be used; one to backlight the steel lattice structure and another to illuminate the underside of the arch structure. In addition, further spotlights will be used to illuminate the statues on the face of the piers.

2.61 The Proposed Illumination of Vauxhall Bridge will adopt white and subtle amber tones.

2.62 There is an existing feeder pillar on the South west side of the bridge which is believed to house an electrical lighting supply. The intention will be to reuse this feeder pillar to introduce a new distribution board to feed the new lighting.

2.63 It is unlikely that the existing supply will have sufficient capacity for the new lighting so an application for an upgraded UKPN supply will be required. Ideally this will be housed in the existing feeder pillar, however if this is not possible an additional feeder pillar will be required in the vicinity.

2.64 The access and installation strategy will primarily employ abseilers to install the new light fittings. Works will be coordinated with the Thames Tideway project working on the southern side of the bridge.

2.65 Illustrative impression proposed illumination (Source: Vauxhall Bridge Design Statement)

2.66 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge

2.67 The physical elements of the proposed Illumination will primarily comprise light fittings, switches, drivers and cables.

2.68 The proposed lighting scheme for Lambeth Bridge uses a number of luminaire types. New linear LED graze fittings will be mounted across the length of the bridge in the same location as existing redundant fluorescent fittings to illuminate the face of the bridge. Custom made baffles will be mounted on the fittings to control the spread of light and minimise spill into the river.

2.69 On the underside of each arch, floodlights will be used to illuminate the structure. In addition, further spotlights will be used to illuminate the face of the piers.

2.70 The Proposed Illumination of Lambeth Bridge will adopt soft red tones to reflect the red leather seats in the House of Lords.

2.71 There are a pair of existing feeder pillars on the South side of the bridge. The intention will be to replace the existing feeder pillar with a like for like replacement and to re-instate the UKPN supply to supply a new distribution board which will serve the new lighting.

2.72 A TFL owned room has been identified beneath Lambeth Bridge on the South side to which access has not yet been available. However, assuming there is sufficient space within this room it is proposed that the computer controllers will be located here within an equipment rack. If the room has insufficient space the alternative will be to install a new feeder pillar housing the control equipment, this would be located adjacent to the existing power feeder pillar on the south side. The new controls feeder pillar would be no taller than the existing.

2.73 The access and installation strategy on Lambeth Bridge will employ abseilers and use of safety boat to install the new light fittings.

2.74 Illustrative impression proposed illumination (Source: Lambeth Bridge Design Statement)

2.75 Application 3: Westminster Bridge

2.76 The physical elements of the proposed Illumination will primarily comprise light fittings, switches, drivers and cables. The proposed lighting scheme for Westminster Bridge uses a number of the luminaire types.

2.77 On the underside of each arch, two sets of floodlights will be used, one to backlight the steel lattice structure and another to illuminate the underside of the arch structure. In addition, a string of LED node points will be installed on both faces of the bridge below the balustrade level behind the existing shields, to replace the existing redundant incandescent lamps.

2.78 The Proposed Illumination of Westminster Bridge will adopt soft green tones to reflect the green leather seats in the House of Commons.

2.79 The drivers will be grouped for all the luminaires between the bridge on each pier adjacent to the existing access walkways.

2.80 There is an existing electrical switch room below the statue on the north side of the bridge. This has adequate spare capacity to supply the new lighting. A new three phase distribution board will be installed to serve the new lighting.

2.81 The computer controllers will be located within the existing switch room beneath the statue on the north side within a dedicated control rack. From this rack, fibre optic cabling will route to local network switches which will distribute the controls to the drivers.

2.82 The access and installation methodology will primarily employ abseilers to install the new light fittings, safety boat and moog trucks.

2.83 Illustrative impression proposed illumination (Source: Westminster Bridge Design Statement)

2.84 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridges

2.85 The physical elements of the proposed Illumination will primarily comprise light fittings, switches, drivers and cables. The proposed lighting scheme for Golden Jubilee Footbridges uses a number of the luminaire types.

2.86 New linear LED graze fittings will be mounted continuously across the length of the bridge to wash the vertical face of the bridge deck. The existing lighting on the bridge will be retained including the balustrade lights and the spotlights mounted to the structure. The existing lighting will be re-connected to allow control from the new lighting system.

2.87 The Proposed Illumination of the Golden Jubilee Footbridges will adopt white tones.

2.88 On the Golden Jubilee Footbridges, bespoke fittings are to be mounted inside the existing balustrade uprights, replacing an existing light fitting in the same location. The new fitting is expected to reuse existing fixing holes, without requiring further structural design.

2.89 The philosophy will be to group the drivers for all the new luminaires within the existing access pits which are located within the bridge deck. The drivers will be fed from a network of power and control cables supplied from a main distribution position at the end of the bridge.

2.90 Cables will be routed within the existing cast-in ducts that run through the bridge deck between access pits. Existing ducts will also be used to route cabling out from the pits to the luminaires.

2.91 Both bridges have existing distribution boards built into the wall adjacent to the lifts on the south side. It is understood that there is sufficient spare ways in these existing boards to supply the new lighting.

2.92 As there are no existing switchroom , the computer controllers will be located within a new feeder pillar enclosure which is proposed to be located beneath the eastern bridge.

2.93 Illustrative impression proposed illumination – from the southbank looking west (Source: Golden Jubilee Footbridge Design Statement)

2.94 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge

2.95 The physical elements of the proposed Illumination will primarily comprise light fittings, switches, drivers and cables. The proposed lighting scheme for Waterloo Bridge uses a number of the luminaire types.

2.96 New linear LED graze fittings will be mounted across the length of the bridge below balustrade level to illuminate the face of the bridge. These fittings will be mounted within purpose made housing supported from the existing handrails. Custom made light shields will be mounted on the fittings to control the spread of light and minimise spill into the river.

2.97 On the underside of the bridge, floodlights will be mounted at the base of each arch to wash the underside of the concrete arches. On each pier, sets of floodlights will be mounted from the walkway and aimed to light the internal faces of the arch structure. Additional LED floodlights are proposed to replace the existing ones over the bookstalls on the south bank to allow the colour temperature to in tune with the artwork.

2.98 In prominent locations it is proposed that the Graze, Node and Floodlight fittings will be painted to a colour in keeping with the colour of the existing bridge structure to minimise their visibility during daylight hours.

2.99 The Proposed Illumination of Waterloo Bridge will adopt constantly changing colours ranging from purple, blue and amber.

2.100 The drivers for the LED Linear Graze luminaires are proposed to be located within the hollow structure of the bridge in both pavements on the bridge deck. The proposal is to create small accessible chambers adjacent to the existing access hatches in which to locate the drivers. The drivers could then be accessed from the pathway beneath a manhole cover.

2.101 The main cable routes would be within the hollow voids of the bridge. The cabling for the under bridge floodlights would pass out from the voids to the pier locations using existing penetrations. The cabling for the LED Linear Graze fittings would be routed in the voids to the new access pits located in the pavement. 2.102 There is an existing electrical switch room located on the north side of the bridge to the rear of the nightclub under the first arch. This switch room supplies the current bridge lighting and it is understood that there is spare capacity within the existing supply.

2.103 The computer controllers will be located within the existing switch room behind the nightclub on the north side within a dedicated control rack. From this rack, fibre optic cabling will route to local network switches which will distribute the controls to the drivers.

2.104 Illustrative impression proposed illumination – from the southbank looking west (Source: Waterloo Bridge Design Statement)

3 RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY

3.1 There are a number of planning permission considered relevant for each of the bridges listed below:

3.2 17/05935/EIASCP - Request for a scoping opinion in respect of an Environmental Impact Assessment in relation to proposed development for the installation of illumination to Waterloo Bridge, Hungerford and Golden Jubilee Bridges, Westminster Bridge, Lambeth Bridge and Vauxhall Bridge.

The Council issued a letter on the 26th January and appended report (prepared by ARUP on behalf of Lambeth Planning) as the Council’s formal scoping opinion in accordance with The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017.

3.3 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge

11/00281/LB - Application Refused - Decision date: 24.03.2011 Replacement of existing fence with a 4.1 high fence clamped to Vauxhall Bridge.

11/03331/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 12.12.2011 Replacement of existing 1.4m high fence with a 4.1m high fence clamped to Vauxhall Bridge.

91/00822/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 17.09.1991 Installation of river traffic navigation lights.

88/01793/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 23.05.1989 Erection of an underbridge river wall and walkway.

3.4 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge

91/00781/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 27.09.1991 Installation of river traffic navigation lights.

3.5 Application 3: Westminster Bridge

97/00645/FUL - Application Permitted - Decision date: 01.06.2000 Extension of the riverside walk beneath Westminster Bridge.

97/00646/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 10.05.2000 Extension of riverside walk beneath Westminster Bridge.

03/02198/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 10.10.2003 Application of exterior scour protection to existing concrete on Piers 3 and 4, using steel sheet piling below the water's surface and up to the approximate level of low tide.

03/02269/FUL - Application Permitted - Decision date: 10.10.2003 Application for exterior scour protection to existing concrete on Piers 3 and 4, using steel sheet piling below the water's surface and up to the approximate level of low tide.

05/03639/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 15.05.2006 Refurbishment of the Westminster Bridge, involving the replacement of existing self- supporting cast iron fascia arches with new cast iron fascia panels supported on a concealed steel support frame, removal, refurbishment and reinstatement of existing decorative spanders and shields, repainting of existing bridge parapet, repair and repainting of outer structural bridge rib, alterations to internal pier masonry and with associated works.

06/02576/DET - Application Permitted - Decision date: 29.09.2006 Approval of details pursuant of Condition 5 (replacement fascia colour scheme) of planning permission 05/03639/LB (Refurbishment of the Westminster Bridge, involving the replacement of existing self-supporting cast iron fascia arches with new cast iron fascia panels supported on a concealed steel support frame, removal, refurbishment and reinstatement of existing decorative spanders and shields, repainting of existing bridge parapet, repair and repainting of outer structural bridge rib, alterations to internal pier masonry and with associated works) granted on 15.5.2006.

06/02725/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 31.10.2006 Refurbishment works to Westminster Bridge lighting, comprising partial replacement, repair, cleaning, and repainting of existing lanterns, support brackets and columns.

06/03062/DET - Application Permitted - Decision date: 31.10.2006 Approval of details pursuant to Condition 4 (Details of the colour scheme of shields) of Listed Building Consent 05/03639/LB (Refurbishment of the Westminster Bridge, involving the replacement of existing self-supporting cast iron fascia arches with new cast iron fascia panels supported on a concealed steel support frame, removal, refurbishment and reinstatement of existing decorative spanders and shields, repainting of existing bridge parapet, repair and repainting of outer structural bridge rib, alterations to internal pier masonry and with associated works), granted on the 15th May 2006.

10/03972/ADV - Application Permitted - Decision date: 24.01.2011 Display of 2 x internally illuminated fascia signs and 2 x internally illuminated projecting signs.

13/03933/LDCP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 21.10.2013 Application for a Certificate of Lawful Development (Proposed) with respect to the installation of 7 static bollards to the Eastern end of Westminster Bridge comprising 6 bollards on Westminster Bridge at the top of the stairs adjacent to the South Bank Lion and 1 bollard near the southern entrance to the bride underpass.

13/03959/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 21.10.2013 Installation of 7 static bollards to the Eastern end of Westminster Bridge comprising 6 bollards on Westminster Bridge at the top of the stairs adjacent to the South Bank Lion and 1 bollard near the southern entrance to the bride underpass.

96/01391/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 12.12.1996 Approval of Details of final colour scheme in compliance with Condition 03 (b) of the Listed Building Consent of 17th April 1995.

96/01145/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 20.05.1996 Approval of details of the junction between the parapets and the masonry piers, in compliance with condition 3 of the Listed Building Consent dated 17 April 1995.

94/01378/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 17.04.1995 Removal and replacement of footway, carriageway and parapets, replacement or repair of piers, abutments and structural metal work, strengthening work and repairs.

94/01187/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 19.07.1994 Removal and replacement of footway and carriageway surface and parapet, replacement or repair of damaged piers, abutments and structural metalwork; strengthening works and repairs.

93/01342/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 13.12.1993 Works to the South Side Abutment to form an extension to the Queen's (Riverside) Walk.

93/01341/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 12.11.1993 Works to the South Side Abutment to form an extension to the Queen's (Riverside) Walk.

91/01005/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 02.10.1991 Installation of coin operated telescope on northside footway.

86/00147/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 25.03.1986 Provision of a pedestrian ramp from Queen's Walk to road surface level. .

3.6 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridges

N/A

3.7 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge 97/00994/FUL - Application Permitted - Decision date: 04.12.1997 Installation of two CCTV cameras on undercroft to bridge above Queens Walk, one CCTV camera adjacent to the bridge access stairway (eastside) and two CCTV camera on undercroft to bridge at upper ground.

97/01023/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 04.12.1997 Installation 2 CCTV cameras to the Waterloo Bridge undercroft above Queens Walk.

07/00714/FUL - Application Permitted - Decision date: 16.04.2007 Installation of a sculpture on the footpath of Waterloo Bridge for a temporary period (23rd April 2007 - 8th October 2007) in association with the Hayward Gallery's 'Event Horizon' exhibition by Anthony Gormley.

07/00715/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 16.04.2007 Installation of a sculpture on the footpath of Waterloo Bridge for a temporary period (23rd April 2007 - 8th October 2007) in associated with the Hayward Gallery's 'Event Horizon' exhibition by Anthony Gormley.

09/03174/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 04.01.2010 Replacement of 11 existing lighting columns with new upgraded columns located within the central reserve across Waterloo Bridge and the replacement of 64 existing manhole covers and frames with new larger manhole covers and frames.

10/00258/LB - Application Permitted - Decision date: 22.06.2010 Proposed wall mounted way finding sign on the wall at the bottom of the staircase on the eastside of Waterloo Bridge.

10/02920/DET - Application Permitted - Decision date: 14.09.2010 Approval of details pursuant to condition 3 (Details of the method used to fix the sign to the bridge ) of planning permission ref: 10/00258/LB (Proposed wall mounted way finding sign on the wall at the bottom of the staircase on the eastside of Waterloo Bridge) granted on: 22.06.2010.

12/00894/FUL - Application Permitted - Decision date: 02.05.2012 Erection of a two towers to accommodate projectors to facilitate the lighting of Waterloo Bridge for a temporary period between 19th July 2012 - 15th September.

12/00901/ADV - Application Permitted - Decision date: 02.05.2012 Display of shards and pictograms.

12/01852/VOC - - Decision date: 19.07.2012 Variation of Condition 1 (to alter dates of permission to 6th June 2012 to 15th September 2012) of Planning Permission ref: 12/00894/FUL [Erection of a two towers to accommodate projectors to facilitate the lighting of Waterloo Bridge for a temporary period] granted 2.05.2012.

93/01426/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 05.05.1994 Upgrading of existing stone parapets and steel handrail.

93/01399/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 29.06.1994 Upgrading of the bridge parapet by the removal of the existing rails and the installation of new rails. 91/01008/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 13.11.1991 Installation of two telescopes on East & West Walkways.

85/01719/PLANAP - Application Permitted - Decision date: 16.10.1985 Installation of bronze viewing plaques on the railings of Waterloo Bridge. 4 CONSULTATIONS 4.1 Statutory Consultees

Consultee Comment

4.1.1 No objection –We have been involved in this project from pre-application stage. In response to Vauxhall Bridge, it is regrettable that there is no space within the bridge structure to accommodate the control panel. However, the fact that there will be no additional feeder pillars is encouraging. We offer no objection. In response to Lambeth Bridge, the applicant’s submission is very comprehensive. Conservation Welcome the fact that the control panel can be accommodated within the bridge on & Urban the north side. Design In response to Waterloo Bridge, welcome the fact that the control cabinet will be within the existing North side plant room and not in public realm. The application documentation is comprehensive. No objection to the proposed illumination. We will need to approve a sample panel of the proposed housing on the bridge itself. To be conditioned. No objection raised with regards to Westminster Bridge, Golden jubilee Footbridge. 4.1.2 No objection - I note that as part of the broader programme to light/amend lighting of a series of bridges spanning the River Thames. I note that a number of the bridges are currently lit above guideline levels. The Proposed Illumination will bring all bridges included in the project/programme in line with guideline levels. This has to be welcomed from a Transport Planning perspective in relation to brightness levels and potential distractions to drivers/all road and footway users. I note the implementation of best practice installation methods as set out in the CoCP (Appendix GEN.04, Volume 4). Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours. I acknowledge that following implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the ES, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of installation of the proposed illumination. Any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short- term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus Transport four weeks decommissioning (with the exception of Tower Bridge). Measures set out in the Framework CoCP (Code of Construction Practice) - submitted for approval as part of the Application - will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. You may wish to include a Planning Condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. However, it may improve conditions for other bridge users and ensure that the brightness level utilised illuminating the surface of the bridge deck, is appropriate. Vauxhall Bridge, Lambeth Bridge, Westminster Bridge, forms a key highways link and forms part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) / Red Route with 2 lanes of east-bound traffic and 3 west-bound, including a bus lane. I suggest Transport for London are consulted. A robust Construction Management Plan should be developed to cover the construction/logistics required for the broader bridge illumination project, covering all bridges. This should be secured by way of Planning Condition and submitted to both Lambeth Transport Planning and TfL, prior to the commencement of any on-site works. In terms of Westminster Bridge, this is a vehicular bridge and therefore, a Method of Construction Plan should be secured by Planning Condition and submitted to Lambeth/TfL for approval prior to the commencement of any associated work, so as to ensure the free and safe flow of traffic (and pedestrians) over Westminster Bridge, throughout construction works/implementation of lighting, as proposed. This could perhaps form part of an overarching Construction Management Plan spanning the broader bridge illumination programme. I can confirm there is no Transport Planning objection to this Planning Application. No response except for Westminster Bridge, there are no issues from a Highways Highway Team perspective. Lambeth

Golden Jubilee footbridges: This bridge is owned by Westminster City Council and Lambeth Council, There is 2 sections of the bridges. Lambeth is the local highway authority for the area in which the Golden Jubilee Bridges are situated up to the midpoint of River Thames from its South Bank Westminster is the local highway authority for the area in which the Golden Jubilee Bridges are situated up to the midpoint of River Thames from its South Bank Although, Lambeth own part of this bridge Westminster maintain this bridge and send an invoice (50% of the total maintenance cost) to Lambeth in accordance with agreement. In other words Westminster is a lead authority for this bridge. End of each financial year, Westminster send the invoice to Lambeth (50%) and we review /verify the cost and pay to Westminster. As Westminster is the lead Authority for this bridge, Lambeth officers do not need to review these documents and If necessary we can forward these documents to review by Westminster. Therefore, Westminster City Council may have to review these documents and make if any comments regarding the proposals for how they will install and maintain the Capital lights on the bridges. Programmes Westminster Bridge: Westminster Bridges is owned and Maintained by Tfl, therefore and Highways Tfl will have to review these documents if necessary. Waterloo Bridge: Waterloo Bridge is owned by Westminster City Council. However, part of the structure is maintained by Lambeth and Tfl. Mainly pedestrian subways. There is a roundabout near the Waterloo Station where the waterloo bridge structure starts, from the roundabout to first expansion joint maintained by Tfl. From the first expansion joint to second expansion maintained by Lambeth. Rest of the long structure maintained by Westminster. However, the whole structure is owned by Westminster City Council. Therefore, Westminster City Council may have to review these documents and make if any comments regarding the proposals for how they will install and maintain the lights on the bridges. Lambeth Bridge: Lambeth Bridge is owned and maintained by TfL. Therefore, Tfl may have to review these documents and make if any comments regarding the proposals for how they will install and maintain the lights on the bridges. Vauxhall Bridge: Vauxhall Bridge is owned and maintained by TfL. Therefore, Tfl may have to review these documents and make if any comments regarding the proposals for how they will install and maintain the lights on the bridges. Parks and 4.1.3 No objection Open Space It is our opinion that the information provided by the applicant is sufficient and Bioregional complies with policy, including sustainable design and construction. The site above application is part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) and therefore, the TfL Surface Asset TFL Investment Sponsorship (Structure) team will liaise with Lambeth Council and respond accordingly. We (TfL Surface Asset Investment Sponsorship) support the proposals and are working with the applicant to develop the details of the operational and asset whole life cost requirements, which need to be considered and signed off before any of the TFL Road works commencing on site. Network Therefore, we think a Condition need to be included in the Planning approval that Development requires the detailed proposals to be reviewed and accepted in writing by TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority prior to any of the works being undertaken on site to the TfL assets (Lambeth Bridge, Vauxhall Bridge and Westminster Bridge). Asset Owner permission should be sought before physical works can go ahead. Sustainability Team On 4.1.4Air No response Quality Flooding No impact on surface water flood risk - NO OBJECTION (SUDs) Environment4.1.5 No objection subject to condition that a detailed lighting management strategy be Agency submitted. 4.1.6 I’m very happy with the ES, but I have added in some points of observation which Arup can respond to if they wish. I think we know, in terms of both aquatic and terrestrial ecology, there are always going to be some ‘unknowns’ in terms of potential impacts upon ecology from the development, as well as secondary or knock-on ones from other concurrent or adjacent developments or activities on, alongside and in the Thames, but the ES has done its very best to assess these as best it can. If we have suitable and appropriate mitigations in place for the Parks and development at both construction and operational stages then we will have done the Open Spaces best to try and contain and manage these unknowns but providing suitable buffering and internal resilience to external or unknown factors. 4.1.7 We know that we might have to do some additional works as to securing ecological data where it is missing or relatively limited in depth and quantity, but that was always going to be the case with such a large and complex project in such a large and complex environment like the Thames. We can discuss what these gaps are an if relevant how we can close them, and that can be discussed when we next convene or move onto the nest steps. Network Rail4.1.8 No response Historic England was pleased to have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. We consider that the scheme reflects our discussions and the advice offered by our specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this Historic occasion. England This application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice. You are hereby authorised to determine the application for listed building consent referred to above as you think fit.

Natural 4.1.9 No comments England London 4.1.10 No response Ecology Unit The PLA’s interest extends to all 15 bridges. One consultation response has therefore been produced. No objection subject to conditions. The PLA had extensive pre-application discussions with the Applicant and their consultants and attended the regular Project Advisory Group meetings. The discussions at pre-application were extremely useful given the scope of the development that is proposed and the PLA would like to highlight the constructive nature of those discussions. The Applicant is also aware of the need for River Works Licences from the PLA. Notice has been served on the PLA but this appears to be limited to Tower Bridge and London Bridge. It is questioned why Notice has not been served on the PLA for all the bridges where the PLA owns the riverbed.

Policy Context The Vision for the Tidal Thames (“Thames Vision”) sets out a 20 year view of the river’s future, developed with stakeholders with the goal of making the most of its potential, for the benefit of all. The Thames Vision contains a number of goals and priority actions including: - Community and Culture: More people enjoying the Thames and its banks. The Illuminated River Project clearly has the potential to bring people to the River and the riverside, particularly at night to enjoy the Thames in accordance with this Thames Vision goal. In addition, there would appear to be support for the IRP in the extant London Plan (2015) which seeks at policy 4.6 to provide support for and enhancement of arts, Port Of culture, sport and entertainment. The draft London Plan (2017) also contains policies London that support the proposed development for example, policy HC5 supports London’s Authority culture and creative industries and policy HC6 supports London’s night time economy. Policy SI16 C seeks to support development proposals for cultural facilities and events, taking into consideration the protection and other uses of the waterways. Finally, the draft Cultural Strategy for London (2018) includes specific reference to the IRP, referring to is as a ‘major new attraction for the City.’ The Cultural Strategy refers to the IRP having two practical aims: (1) making the riverside pathways safer and more welcoming and (2) through technology making the lighting on the bridges more environmentally sustainable. The IRP is identified under policy 7 as a project which will integrate culture into major infrastructure projects. In principle the IRP would therefore appear to make an important contribution towards realising a number of cultural goals and policies. As such, the PLA is supportive in principle of the project. This is subject to the detailed technical consideration of the proposal and its impacts on the river and river users as set out below. Phasing It is proposed to light 15 existing bridges from Albert Bridge to Tower Bridge. It is currently proposed to carry out the project in five phases. Phase one relates to London Bridge, Cannon Street Railway Bridge, Southwark Bridge and Millennium Bridge and it is proposed that installation on these four bridges will take place from September to December 2018. The phasing plan highlights that the phasing strategy ‘will be subject to change as the scheme progresses’ therefore given the detailed navigational planning that will be required, a condition on any grant of planning permission should condition phase 1 installation to be between september and December 2018. A detailed phasing plan for each subsequent phase of the project should then be required to be submitted and approved on completion of each phase. This would mean for example that the phase 2 phasing plan should be submitted on completion of the phase 1 installation works. Installation and Maintenance At this stage in the project it is not possible to provide detailed installation methodologies for each bridge. The Applicant has advised that these will not be fully developed until principal contractors are appointed post planning. Therefore to support the planning application (and River Works Licence) draft / outline rules have been developed for the phase 1 bridges and are set out in the Project Overview document. A framework Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) has also been submitted. The detailed installation methodologies and risk assessments are of critical importance to the PLA to ensure the safety of navigation is maintained during construction. Therefore a condition on any planning permission must require the submission and approval of detailed rules for the phase 1 bridges prior to the commencement of the phase 1 construction works. Detailed rules must then be submitted for each subsequent phase prior to the commencement of construction works for that phase. This would allow adjustments to be made to the installation methodologies if required. A condition must also require the submission and approval of detailed CoCP’s prior to the commencement of each phase of work. The Applicant is advised that it will be important to use the correct terminology in these documents. For example, the framework CoCP makes reference to night time working where closure of a ‘navigational channel’ is required. As the navigable channel is shown by the pecked lines on the PLA’s charts and is a single entity, it is assumed that the Applicant actually means closure of the main navigable arch. Whilst it is anticipated that there would be a decreased maintenance requirement associated with the new LED fittings compared to the existing lighting and that any maintenance required will be undertaken as part of the existing maintenance regime, it will be important to fully understand the maintenance methodologies and timings. It is therefore recommended that a condition on any grant of planning permission requires the submission and approval of maintenance methodologies for each bridge. The PLA would then need to be notified of the timings of any maintenance works. Should the project be time limited (the scoping report referred to ‘more than 10 years’) then it will be important that a condition on any grant of planning permission secures the submission and approval of a decommissiong plan at the appropriate time. Lighting/Light Spill Due to the changing nature of the River and riverside within the project area, 13 of the bridges have been classed as urban setting with high district brightness (Class E4) and Albert and Chelsea bridges have been classed as suburban medium district brightness (Class E3). The Applicant has used these classifications and undertaken calculations to determine the target luminance level on the face of each bridge; illustrative lux levels 1 m above the highest spring tide level; and has assessed compliance with the ‘Institution of Lighting Professionals Guidance for Reduction of Obtrusive Light’. A range of mitigation measures are also proposed during the operational phase including: Directional lighting No direct lighting of the water column Use of light shields Retaining the existing bridge ‘light up’ hours Tables 3.3a and 3.3b in the Environmental Statement (ES) set out the existing and target luminance and illustrative lux levels. In terms of luminance on the face of the bridge, levels would be significantly reduced at Albert Bridge, Chelsea Bridge and Tower Bridge. Nine bridges would have target luminance levels higher than the existing average luminance levels and on three bridges the luminance levels would stay the same as existing. In terms of lux levels, again there is a mixture of results with reductions in light spill at Albert Bridge, Southwark Bridge, London Bridge and Tower Bridge. At all other bridges the lux levels would increase over existing levels and this increase would be between 0.7 lux and 4.7 lux. The maximum reflected light at 1m above the highest spring tide level will be <5 lux directly beneath Albert Bridge, Chelsea Bridge, Grosvenor Bridge, Vauxhall Bridge, Lambeth Bridge, Westminster Bridge, Golden Jubilee Bridge, Blackfriars Road Bridge, Blackfriars Railway Bridge, Millennium Bridge, Southwark Bridge and Tower Bridge. The maximum reflected light beneath Waterloo Bridge, Cannon Bridge and London Bridge will be approximately <6 lux.Based on the above information, the Applicant has concluded that the ILP “will meet or exceed the recommendations of the Institution of Lighting Professionals Guidance for Reduction of Obtrusive light” As the Applicant recognises, the work they have undertaken on luminance and lux levels are targets and illustrative. A condition on any grant of planning permission should therefore require the spill light survey and luminance survey to be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b are being exceeded. The use of energy efficient LED’s would help contribute to the Thames Vision priority action ‘to encourage the uptake of new and green technologies to reduce the port’s environmental impact.’ Additionally the removal of existing edundant lighting on the sides and underside of the bridges where required to facilitate the new installation would provide a positive benefit, reducing the clutter on the bridges. The removal of this redundant lighting should therefore be required by condition. The PLA’s navigational lighting will remain. It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. Conclusions The IRP provides an exciting opportunity to bring more people to the River and riverside in line with a number of organisations goals and policies. Subject to the securing of the necessary conditions detailed above, the impacts on the river and river users would appear to be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development.

City of We do not wish to comment in detail but note that we are currently considering Westminster matching applications relating to the parts of these proposals which lie within our boundary. We ask that permissions are only granted subject to a condition(s) requiring implementation over the entirety of the bridge. I have no comments to make regarding this application, other than to ask that the Design Out lighting is sympathetic to CCTV in the area, which can be supported by achieving Crime Officer BS5489 lighting standards (apply to all bridges). London 4.1.11 No response Wildlife Trust National Rivers 4.1.12 No response Authority Development Control 4.1.13 No response Department Thames Water Sewers Major Development 4.1.14 No response (20+) Thames Water Tideway has no objection to the proposed development and is supportive of the aspiration to connect, celebrate and capture the spirit of the Thames and its diverse Thames communities. Tideway is liaising with the Illuminated River project as the project Tideway develops to ensure that the delivery of the nationally significant Thames Tideway Tunnel is not compromised. London Duck 4.1.15 No response Tours 4.1.16 No objection subject to conditions. 4.1.17 Mitigation of Environmental Impact from Light: Previous assessments of the impact of light on the river surface and feeding birds was identified as a source of concern. It is noted that table 3.3 of Chapter 3 states that target light levels at the river surface are generally less than 5 lux and that all sites are stated to be <6 lux. EHST Light4.1.18 Additional statements in the ecology section show that it is accepted that the Pollution proposal will reduce the spill of light on to the river and thus provide general betterment. Light levels in this section are generally referred to being measured at 1m above the high water mark. 4.1.19 Based on the details of the EIA report and the previous considerations of the ecological reports RSS would recommend use of conditions to control illumination of the ricer and restrict overspill to nearby sensitive receptors for each bridge. 4.1.20 No objection subject to conditions. Although noise has been screened out as a significant impact in terms of the EIA it is still acknowledged as a material Planning Consideration. It is noted that the applicant states they will be applying for a section 61 consent. The LPA and the applicant must ensure that Lambeth Environmental Health team is prepared to support this application and work with the applicant to develop a suitable scheme of work. It should be recognised that the applicant is likely to be able to agree a section 61 EHST Noise agreement in principle with other authorities RSS would suggest exploring if Lambeth Pollution EH are willing to work with other authorities to identify a lead authority and thus develop a single scheme of work that will suit all parties. Notwithstanding the agreement of a suitable Section 61 agreement based on Control of Pollution Act 1974, for the proposed installation works, it is recommended that a condition requiring details of construction noise monitoring and mitigation be placed on the application. This will ensure that the LPA is informed and considered in relation to noise mitigation matters. This will ensure that the LPA approves the location of any site compounds and associated noisy equipment such as generators or compressors that might be used. EHST Land Contamination- No comments as this has been screened out and we would agree Contamination with the applicant and consider there to be no relevant planning maters in this regard. Corporation Of 4.1.21 No response London No formal objection is raised to the proposed development but the Council wishes to make the following comment: London Borough of Southwark has no objections to make in respect of this London application (Lambeth Bridge and Waterloo bridge), which forms part of the wider Borough Of Illuminated River proposals. London Borough of Southwark has been liaising, and will Southwark continue to do so as and where appropriate, with the six other central London local authorities on all the Illuminated River applications until a final decision is made on each. No response received regarding Vauxhall, Westminster and Golden Jubilee footbridge. GLA 4.1.22 No response 4.1.23 Endorsement Letter of Support 4.1.24 The proposals will enhance the bridges, the River Thames and key views 4.1.25 The project will help people stop and appreciate what is often ignored, missed or taken for granted 4.1.26 The project will contribute to the economy of the River and London 4.1.27 The project will positively contribute to London's World City status 4.1.28 This is a unique opportunity to deliver a unified artwork along the River 4.1.29 This will increase opportunities for riverside recreation and enjoyment 4.1.30 The significant new investment will strengthen the culture and night time economy of London 4.1.31 Public art on this scale will be an important part of London's cultural offer for Londoners and visitors alike 4.1.32 The project will make a unique contribution to the riverside whilst being sensitive to Cross River residents and wildlife Partnership4.1.33 Improvements to the night time character and legibility of the riverside will be made for pedestrians and river users 4.1.34 The project will provide a better appreciation of the forms of the bridges and heritage and landmark buildings 4.1.35 The project will improve pedestrian accessibility and encourage use of alternative routes across the river and in surrounding areas 4.1.36 The project will enhance the historic environment and important local views 4.1.37 The project will improve the appearance of the bridges at night and enable better appreciation of the architectural features 4.1.38 The scheme has been developed through extensive engagement with stakeholders 4.1.39 The scheme has taken particular care of the environmental impact of light at night 4.1.40 The scheme will deliver the replacement of old, partly broken, out-dated and energy inefficient light fixtures with new, modern and energy efficient fixtures

Ancient Monuments No response Society*1

1 For those consultees starred, the request for comments did not include the application Golden Jubilee Bridge as it is not Listed. Council for British No response Archaeology* The Georgian No response Group* Society for Protection No response Ancient Bldgs* Victorian No response Society*

4.2 Other Consultees

Consultee Comment Bridge Vauxhall Bridge Lambeth Bridge Westminster Footbridge Jubilee Golden Bridge Waterloo

Harleyford Court No response Tenants Association Harleyford Road Action No response Group Vauxhall One Business No response Improvement Districts Kennington Association No response Planning Forum Regeneration Team No response except for comments regarding Golden Jubilee Bridge. They are as follows: The lighting installation and maintenance arrangements should ensure no or minimal disruption to regular use of the bridges.

Has consideration been given to enabling the lighting schemes to vary colour schemes on demand, e.g. during national celebrations, etc? Has the power supply demand assessment been made to ensure that sufficient power is available?

Regents Bridge No response Gardens Ltd Vauxhall No response Neighbourhood Housing Forum Vauxhall St Peters No response Heritage Centre Friends Of Vauxhall No response Pleasure Gardens Friends Of Lambeth No response High Street Recreation Ground Kennington Oval & No response Vauxhall Forum Tradescant Area No response Residents Association Oval & Kennington No response Residents Association St George Wharf No response Residents Association Ward Councillors No response Association of Waterloo No response Groups Friends Of Old Paradise No response Gardens Whitgift Estate Tenants No response Association The Vauxhall Society No response Vauxhall Gardens No response Estate Resident And Tenant Association Waterloo Community No response Development Group 9 Albert Embankment No response Residents' Association We Are Waterloo No response Jubilee Walkway Trust No response South Bank And No response Waterloo Neighbours Friends Of Archbishop's No response Park South Bank Employers No response Group Friends Of Hatfield No response Green Friends Of Jubilee No response Gardens Lambeth Estates No response Residents Association Friends Of St John's No response Churchyard Southbank & Waterloo No response Forum Westminster Square No response Residents' Association South Bank Board No response South Bank No response Management Company Ltd Neighbourhood No response Regeneration County Hall Residents No response Association Association of waterloo No response Groups 4.3 Adjoining owners/occupiers

4.3.1 A site notice was displayed from 13/06/2018 -13/07/2018 (Application 1:Vauxhall; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge, Application 3: Westminster Bridge; and Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge), 19/06/2018 -19/07/2018 (Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) and the applications were advertised in the local paper on 05/06/2018-29/06/2018 (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge, Application 3: Westminster Bridge; and Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge), 26/06/2018 -20/07/2018 (Application 5: Waterloo Bridge).

4.3.2 3 letters of objection (1x Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; 1 x Application 2: Lambeth Bridge and 1 x Application 3: Westminster Bridge) and 1 letter (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge) neither objecting nor supporting the proposal was received. A summary of the concerns raised is set out below:

Summary of objections Response Design/Heritage There is limited information submitted for Sufficient information has been submitted this to be assessed by heritage and for this to be assessed by heritage and conservation officers conservation officers. They have no objection subject to conditions. See section 6.2 (paragraphs 6.2.1- 6.2.47 for full assessment). Spoke with Historic England and they do not Historic England was pleased to have been recall supporting this. involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. We consider that the scheme reflects our discussions and the advice offered by our specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion.

This application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

You are hereby authorised to determine the application for listed building consent referred to above as you think fit. Cumulative impact that will create a chaotic In views where the bridges are seen las vegas on the Thames – red and green together with other bridges, including lights + Plaza Hotel and County House Lambeth Bridge, the bridges would be BLUE illumination + London Eye in all unified by the kinetic movement of the colors. proposed Illumination, whilst maintaining individual identities through the use of subtle You won’t be able to enjoy the views of the differences in colours of light and lighting Palace of Westminster and it would that accentuates the different architectural deteriorate this heritage area. features of the bridges. In particular, Lambeth Bridge’s group value with Westminster Bridge would be enhanced through the bridges expressing the relevant colours of the House of Lords (red) and the House of Commons (green) within the setting of the Westminster WHS. It is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would not harm the special interest or significance of the listed Lambeth or Westminster Bridge, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).See section 6.2 (paragraphs 6.2.1- 6.2.47 for full assessment). Environmental Increasing not necessary environmental Any effects associated with the installation pollution. of the proposed illumination will be phased and short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning. Subject to conditions the proposal would have minimal potential effects during installation on air quality and noise and disturbance (see section 6.3.9 paragraphs 6.3.10 -6.3.12 for full assessment) In relation to ecology and biodiversity, subject to conditions, the proposal would have a negligible impact on ecology and biodiversity (see section 6.5 paragraphs 6.5.1-6.5.19 for full assessment). In relation to sustainability and waste, it is considered that careful consideration has been given to the design of the scheme (see section 6.8 paragraphs 6.8.1-6.8.9 for full assessment). With regards to the Environmental Statement there is sufficient information to reliably inform decision making on the planning applications. The details submitted do not illustrate The southbank either side of Lambeth Lambeth Bridge or Westminster Bridge how Bridge along Albert Embankment is this will interact with existing reflections developed with some commercial and when viewed from Lambeth Bridge. residential properties on the west side of the bridge and Lambeth Palace to the east side. The buildings on the Albert Embankment to the south are relatively low luminance with much tree cover on the bank side.

The Southbank either side of Westminster Bridge is developed with St Thomas’s Hospital, County Hall, London Eye and Shell building. The applicants Westminster Bridge Design Statement indicates the Luminance Level (cd/m²) for County Hall – 10, London Eye - 20 and Shell building - 20.

The bridges can be classed as being within an urban setting with distinct brightness. Many of the bridges, even those with no decorative/artistic lighting are currently producing light spill into the River Thames from the street lights on the bridge deck.

The lighting scheme for each bridge has been designed so that luminaries would be directed at the bridge structures themselves and a number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. Conditions are recommended to control illumination to safeguard and restrict overspill to sensitive receptors. (See section 6.3 paragraphs 6.3.1-6.3.8 for discussion on light spill). Other Residents not consulted by applicant or Letters were sent to residents within vicinity Council of the bridges. A site notice was displayed from 13/06/2018 -13/07/2018 (Vauxhall, Lambeth, Westminster and Golden Jubilee Bridges), 19/06/2018 -19/07/2018 (Waterloo Bridge) and the applications were advertised in the local paper on 05/06/2018-29/06/2018 (Vauxhall, Lambeth, Westminster and Golden Jubilee Bridges), 26/06/2018 - 20/07/2018. Will the Council impose ban on commercial Illuminated River is by artist Leo Villareal, is advertising and changing of the colours. a public artwork that will provide a unified kinetic light installation across the 15 bridges. The illumination will be kinetic with subtle changes in the colour and intensity of light. Digital control of the luminaries will allow abstract sequences to actively define the forms of the bridge creating a non- repetitive and unique pattern. The lighting design is specific to each bridge respecting and revealing their distinctive histories and architectural features. Whilst each bridge will be lit differently, the artwork will be designed to unify the 15 bridges. A condition is recommended that the illuminated displays must not include corporate sponsorship or any form of advertising. How do you condition the level and colour of The transience of the light colour change light and how this will be enforced. and intensity will be conditioned and witnessed by the Local Planning Authority through a site inspection. It will then be required to be maintained in accordance with those details. If the charity does not have funds to maintain The Applicant, the Illuminated River it what will happen. Who is going to remove Foundation, is an independent charity set up it at who's costs. to lead the project. Apart from an initial investment and start-up from the Olympic Reserve towards the costs of the initial competition of £250,000, it is funded through philanthropic sources. Conditions are recommended that the details for the long term maintenance arrangements for the proposals are submitted for approval prior to bringing into use the lighting scheme for approval by the LPA/TfL where applicable. If the final lighting scheme be disused for more than 12 months or permanently cease a decommissioning plan shall be submitted to the LPA for approval and the decommissioning carried out in-accordance with the approved details. Not material planning considerations Please do not spend unnecessary money at The Applicant, the Illuminated River a time when the country is in debt and is Foundation, is an independent charity set up likely to go through an uncertain future. to lead the project. Apart from an initial investment and start-up from the Olympic Reserve towards the costs of the initial competition of £250,000, it is funded through philanthropic sources.

4.3.3 4 letters of support for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge, Application 3: Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; and Application 5 Waterloo Bridge),were received 1x from London & Partners the Mayor of London's official promotional agency; and 1x Worshipful Company of Lightmongers - concerned with the art and science of lighting and how it can be used to enhance our night time experience. 1x Somerset House and 1x Levitt’s. A summary of the points raised are set out below:

Summary of support Response London & Partners is the Mayor of London's official promotional agency; our role includes building London's international reputation and attracting international audiences. As part of this we are keen to support new initiatives that help attract visitors, students and businesses to the capital.

We have been impressed by the quality of the bid and the proposed artwork submitted by the Illuminated River Foundation, and would like to register my support for this application.

London is a city of creative energy that is constantly reinventing itself and our art, culture, music, architecture and heritage continue to set us apart acting as a draw for visitors.

With that in mind we would like to make the following observations: • The project will act as a new reason to visit the capital helping us maintain London’s reputation as a world-class visitor destination and allowing us to tell London’s story brilliantly overseas. • The draw of the scheme is likely to have a positive impact on the night time economy in the areas surrounding the bridges. • The expected increase in river boat users at night-time will support the promotion of the river as another mode of transport and present river operators with an opportunity to create bespoke tours as new sources of income. Here at London & Partners we look forward to welcoming what promises to be another high-profile initiative to the capital. We are confident that the scheme will have a positive impact on London’s attractiveness and global standing attracting those living, working, studying and visiting the capital to discover The Thames like never before.

I would be grateful if you could bring these comments to the attention of your members when they consider the planning application. As the Worshipful Company of Lightmongers we are concerned with the art and science of lighting and how it can be used to enhance our night time experience. London is one of the world's pre-eminent cities attracting millions of visitors every year who contribute to the economy. It is only fitting it should have world class lighting.

There is a growing movement for cities to use lighting to enhance the night time experience and studies have shown that this has brought real value to the local community. This is both financial but also in the civic pride it brings to citizens. Look at any postcards of London and you will see night time images.

Over the years there have been many attempts to bring a coordinated lighting plan to the river but these have all failed. This initiative by the Illuminated River Foundation is built on a solid foundation and has all the hallmarks of success. It will be a unique attraction to London to have all 15 bridges not only illuminated but done so in a coordinated way as a show piece of public art across the city.

It also has the possibility to reach out and engage with local communities as well as being part of all major celebrations centered around the city. We hope that beyond the initial 10 year period of this project the local boroughs can work together to maintain the installations well into the future. It has the potential to become one of London’s iconic symbols.

The Worshipful Company of Lightmongers fully support and endorse this exciting project and look forward to seeing the first bridges illuminated next year. Livett’s has been part of the Thames community for many years; our family have worked the river for many generations with pride and a great appreciation for its role within the city. We are passionate about developing the positive usage of the Thames. As such, we are writing to support the planning applications submitted for Illuminated River. We believe that this project will positively contribute to the economy of the river, increasing the opportunities on the riverside for recreation and enjoyment. This exciting project provides a unique opportunity to deliver a unified artwork along the river, as well as bringing a new appreciation of these sometimes-overlooked crossings. Public art on this scale will be an important part of London’s cultural offering for both Londoners and visitors alike. This project will enhance the chosen bridges highlighting their architectural heritage and the features of each of them, giving a new perspective on them and their surrounding environments. It will refresh key river views. This scheme has been developed through extensive engagement with stakeholders and residents. It appreciates the environmental impacts of light at night, not only for residents but for wildlife so the scheme has been developed with this sensitivity in mind. As part of the project the inefficient, outdated light fittings with be replaced new, modern and energy efficient fixtures reducing their carbon footprint. We believe that this project will positively contribute to London’s World City status, and whole-heartedly support these applications.

I am writing on behalf of Somerset House in support of Illuminated River. The river is a very underused asset for London and this exciting project could have a big impact in changing that. We’re very excited about this proposal to create a free, public, unified artwork across central London bridges. It will make a huge improvement to the recreation and enjoyment of the river. It will also to enhance the historic environment and appreciation of important local views, such as the neighbouring Waterloo Bridge, in particular through the significant reduction in the current high levels of direct light spill into the River Thames. We have been kept appraised of the idea through extensive engagement with internal and external stakeholders and are delighted with the way that it is progressing.

5 POLICIES

5.1 Section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 requires planning decisions to be made in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.

5.2 The development plan in Lambeth is the London Plan (2016), and the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

5.3 The National Planning Policy Framework was amended in 2018. This document sets out the Government’s planning policies for England including the presumption in favour of sustainable development and is a material consideration in the determination of all applications.

5.4 The current planning application has been considered against all relevant national, regional and local planning policies as well as any relevant guidance. Set out below are those policies most relevant to the application, however, consideration is made against the development plan as a whole.

5.5 The London Plan (2016)

Policy 1.1 Delivering the strategic vision and objectives for London Policy 2.9 Inner London Policy 2.10 Central Activities Zone – Strategic Priorities Policy 2.13 Opportunity areas and intensification areas Policy 4.1: Developing London’s economy Policy 4.5: London’s Visitor Infrastructure Policy 4.6: Support for and enhancement of arts, culture, sport and entertainment. Policy 5.1 Climate change mitigation Policy 5.2 Minimising carbon dioxide emissions Policy 5.3 Sustainable design and construction Policy 5.12 Flood risk management Policy 5.21 Contaminated land Policy 6.3 Assessing effects of development on transport capacity Policy 6.5 Funding Crossrail and other strategically important transport infrastructure Policy 6.11 Smoothing traffic flow and tackling congestion Policy 7.2 An inclusive environment Policy 7.3 Designing out crime Policy 7.4 Local character Policy 7.5 Public realm Policy 7.8: Heritage assets and archaeology Policy 7.14 Improving air quality Policy 7.15 Reducing and managing noise, improving and enhancing the acoustic environment and promoting appropriate soundscapes Policy 7.19 Biodiversity and access to nature Policy 7.21: Trees and woodlands Policy 7.29: The River Thames Policy 8.2 Planning obligations Policy 8.3 Community Infrastructure Levy

5.6 Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

Policy D1 Delivery and monitoring Policy D2 Presumption in favour of sustainable development Policy D3 Infrastructure Policy D4 Planning obligations Policy ED11: Visitor attractions, leisure, arts and cultural uses Policy T1 Sustainable travel Policy T5: River transport Policy T6 Assessing impacts of development on transport capacity and infrastructure Policy EN1 Open space and biodiversity Policy EN4 Sustainable design and construction Policy EN5 Flood Risk Policy Q1 Inclusive environments Policy Q2 Amenity Policy Q3 Community safety Policy Q4 Public Art Policy Q5 Local distinctiveness Policy Q6 Urban design: public realm Policy Q8 Design quality: construction detailing Policy Q9 Landscaping Policy Q10 Trees Policy Q19 Westminster World Heritage Site Policy Q20: Statutory listed buildings Policy Q21 Registered parks and gardens Policy Q22: Conservation Areas Policy Q23: Undesignated heritage assets: local heritage list Policy Q24: River Thames Policy Q25: Views 5.7 Supplementary Planning Documents

Regional

Vauxhall Nine Elms Battersea Opportunity Area Framework (March 2012) Waterloo Opportunity Area Planning Framework (Ovctober 2007) Use of planning obligations in the funding of Crossrail, and the Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy (April 2012); Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Guidance (April 2014); The control of dust and emission during construction and demolition (July 2014); London View Management Framework SPG (March 2012) London World Heritage Sites (March 2012) Planning for Equality and Diversity in London (October 2007)

Lambeth

Vauxhall Supplementary Planning Document (January 2013) Waterloo Area Supplementary Planning Document (March 2013)

6 ASSESSMENT

6.1 Land Use

6.1.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.1.2 The proposal is an artwork that will incorporate a unified kenetic light installation across central London bridges, five of which are in Lambeth and located within Vauxhall ( Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge and Application 2: Lambeth Bridge) and Waterloo (Application 3: Westminster Bridge, Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge and Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) Opportunity Areas. The bridges are public spaces readily accessible to anyone. The artwork for each bridge will respond to the local context and distinctiveness of each bridge. Given this the proposal would accord with Policy Q4 of the Lambeth Local Plan which seeks to encourage the provision of new public art in opportunity areas, landmark sites and public parks and public spaces.

6.1.3 Policy ED11 seeks to promote, safeguard and improve leisure, recreation, arts and cultural facilities where they meet local and wider needs, especially in central activities zones Vauxhall and Waterloo London plan Opportunity Areas. The bridges are located within the Central Activities Zone and Vauxhall and/or Waterloo Opportunity Areas. The applicant has advised that the artwork would not be a one off attraction where each bridge would act as a destination in its own right. Rather, the applicant intends that the proposal would extend people’s experience of walking along the river. There are no specific points for crowds to linger and it would be free to view.

6.1.4 All the bridges are within the Thames Policy Area, and Policy Q24 of the Local Plan sets out that when making proposals along the River Thames applicants should be able to show that their proposals, enhance the character of the river frontage, views from the river and from the opposite bank; preserve the setting and approaches of the Thames bridges; are contextual – reinforcing the distinctiveness of the wider city river front; respect the unique character of the Albert Embankment as a piece of historic engineering; and reinforce connections from the city to the river.

6.1.5 The Illuminated River proposals for the bridges will promote the role of the River Thames as a strategically important and iconic feature of London. The lighting design is specific to each bridge respecting and revealing their distinctive histories and architectural features. Whilst each bridge will be lit differently, the artwork will be designed to unify all 15 bridges within the project. The proposals would enhance the river frontage. It would provide a unique opportunity to deliver a unified artwork in the Thames Policy Area thereby reinforcing the distinctiveness of the wider city river front. As noted above the applicant anticipates that the proposal would extend people’s experience of walking along the river thereby reinforcing connections. It is considered that the proposal would enhance the appreciation of each of the bridges and their settings whilst not affecting views. The proposed illumination would be an enhancement to the appearance of Albert Embankment.

6.1.6 The proposal would deliver public art in recognition of the Bridges as landmarks located within the Vauxhall and Waterloo Opportunity Areas, it will enhance the character and appearance, and the ability to appreciate the special interest, of the five bridges whilst respecting Albert Embankment. The public art can be viewed from public spaces to be enjoyed by anyone. It is considered that the proposal would accord with policies Q4, Q24 and ED11 of the Local Plan.

6.2 Design and Conservation

6.2.1 Heritage, Views and Design

6.2.2 Paragraph 8 of the NPPF sets out three overarching objectives, contained within the planning system, in order to achieve sustainable development. These objective are interdependent and need to be pursued in mutually supportive ways and include the following (with detail provided on the most relevant objective to this section); an economic objective; a social objective; an environmental objective –to contribute to protecting and enhancing our natural, built and historic environment.

6.2.3 The NPPF defines a “heritage asset” as:

“A building, monument, site place, area or landscape identified as having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest”.

6.2.4 The definition includes both designated heritage assets (of which, Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas are relevant here) and assets identified by the local planning authority (including local listing)

6.2.5 “Significance” is defined within the NPPF as being:

“the value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. That interest may be archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives from a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its “setting”.

6.2.6 Paragraph 190 of the NPPF requires local planning authorities to identify and assess the particular significance of any heritage asset that may be affected by a proposal (including by development affecting its setting), taking account of the available evidence and any necessary expertise. That assessment should then be taken into account when considering the impact of the proposal on the heritage asset, to avoid or minimise conflict between the heritage asset’s conservation and any aspect of the proposal.

6.2.7 Paragraphs 192 and 193 of the NPPF provide as follows:

Paragraph 192. In determining planning applications, local planning authorities should take account of: the desirability of sustaining and enhancing the significance of heritage assets and putting them to viable uses consistent with their conservation;

 the positive contribution that conservation of heritage assets can make to sustainable communities including their economic vitality; and

 the desirability of new development making a positive contribution to local character and distinctiveness.

Paragraph 193. When considering the impact of a proposed development on the significance of a designated heritage asset, great weight should be given to the asset’s conservation (and the more important the asset, the greater the weight should be). This is irrespective of whether any potential harm amounts to substantial harm, total loss or less than substantial harm to its significance. 6.2.8 Paragraph 194. Any harm to, or loss of, the significance of a designated heritage asset (from its alteration or destruction, or from development within its setting) should require clear and convincing justification. Substantial harm to or loss of: a) grade II listed buildings, or grade II registered parks or gardens, should be exceptional; b) assets of the highest significance, notably scheduled monuments, protected wreck sites, registered battlefields, grade I and II* listed buildings, grade I and II* registered parks and gardens, and World Heritage Sites, should be wholly exceptional.

6.2.9 Paragraph 195 of the NPPF deals with substantial harm to or total loss of significance of significance of a designated heritage asset.

6.2.10 Paragraph 196 of the NPPF provides that where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its optimum viable use.

6.2.11 Paragraph 197 of the NPPF deals with non-designated heritage assets as follows:

197. The effect of an application on the significance of a non-designated heritage asset should be taken into account in determining the application. In weighing applications that affect directly or indirectly non designated heritage assets, a balanced judgement will be required having regard to the scale of any harm or loss and the significance of the heritage asset.

6.2.12 Paragraphs 200 and 201 of the NPPF are as follows:

200. Local planning authorities should look for opportunities for new development within Conservation Areas and World Heritage Sites, and within the setting of heritage assets, to enhance or better reveal their significance. Proposals that preserve those elements of the setting that make a positive contribution to the asset (or which better reveal its significance) should be treated favourably.

201. Not all elements of a Conservation Area or World Heritage Site will necessarily contribute to its significance. Loss of a building (or other element) which makes a positive contribution to the significance of the Conservation Area or World Heritage Site should be treated either as substantial harm under paragraph 195 or less than substantial harm under paragraph 196, as appropriate, taking into account the relative significance of the element affected and its contribution to the significance of the Conservation Area or World Heritage Site as a whole.

6.2.13 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge (grade II*)

6.2.14 Impact on the Special Interest and Significance of Vauxhall Bridge

The significance of the grade II* designated heritage asset is of relevance in the consideration of this application.

The list description for Vauxhall Bridge states that the bridge was designed by two chief engineers of the London County Council, Sir Alexander Binnie and his successor Sir Maurice Fitzmaurice and was opened in 1906.It has considerable architectural significance for the work by sculptors Alfred Drury RA and Frederick Pomeroy RA which adorns the piers. The work is not only unique - no other British river crossing contains sculpture - but also of a very high quality. Vauxhall Bridge is sited near a group of listed buildings and has group value with Lambeth Bridge.

The proposed Illumination will be focussed on the sculptures and arches of the bridge. The proposed Illumination of Vauxhall Bridge will adopt white and subtle amber tones.

The fixtures and fittings required for the proposed Illumination are located in discrete locations within the bridge structure and/or utilise existing light fittings to ensure minimal visual impact of the fixtures and fittings during the day time.

New loads from the LED Linear Graze fittings and mounting channel are relatively small - however the applicant’s supporting statements indicate that it is recommended that an intrusive survey is done to confirm the construction and condition of the existing structure being fixed to. Otherwise, the loads being added to the bridge are negligible, and are not considered an issue structurally. A condition is recommended that details of fixing method used, details of lighting to be removed/retained and paint schedule for any prominent light fittings is submitted.

There is an existing feeder pillar on the South west side of the bridge which is believed to house an electrical lighting supply. The applicant has advised at this stage it has not been possible to confirm the capacity of this supply or the contents of the feeder pillar. The intention will be to reuse this feeder pillar to introduce a new distribution board to feed the new lighting.

It is unlikely that the existing supply will have sufficient capacity for the new lighting so an application for an upgraded UKPN supply will be required. Ideally this will be housed in the existing feeder pillar, however if this is not possible an additional feeder pillar will be required in the vicinity. Possible location for control feeder pillar on southside riverside path. The final location of this will need to be agreed. (Typical Feeder Pillar Dims - 1800m w x 1500mm h x 500mm d). A condition is recommended that final details of electrical cabling and equipment are submitted prior to commencement.

The access and installation strategy will primarily employ abseilers to install the new light fittings. Works will be coordinated with the Thames Tideway project working on the southern side of the bridge. A condition is recommended that a detailed installation methodology which forms part of the phasing plan is submitted prior to commencement.

Luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge is currently free from artistic lighting. The transience of the light colour change and intensity will be conditioned, to ensure that it is appropriate and does not appear unduly prominent on completion.

There would be a visual assimilation with the listed bridge and the proposed lighting scheme achieved through a colour scheme, which would match or complement the structure - the details to be secured by condition. The siting, size and form of the proposed luminaires and other associated works, would be discreet and minimal. The siting, orientation and scope of the luminaires are an appropriate response to the architectural character of the Bridge. It is considered that the proposal would enhance an appreciation of Vauxhall Bridge and allow for a better appreciation of its architectural significance and the ability to appreciate that interest, and its setting. Overall, it is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would not harm the special interest or significance of the listed Vauxhall Bridge, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

6.2.15 Impact on Designated Heritage Assets

No impact on setting of Westminster World Heritage Site. Enhancement to the appearance of the Albert Embankment Conservation Area, Millbank Conservation Area and Pimlico Conservation Area.

6.2.16 Non Designated heritage Assets

No impact on setting of MI6 Building

6.2.17 Assessment of Harm versus benefit

No harm has been identified.

6.2.18 Historic England

Have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. They consider that the scheme reflects their discussions and the advice offered by their specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion. They advise the application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

They have authorised the Council to determine the application for listed building consent as we see fit.

6.2.19 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge (grade II*)

6.2.20 Impact on the Special Interest and Significance of Lambeth Bridge

The significance of the grade II* designated heritage asset is of relevance in the consideration of this application.

The list description states the reasons for designation as Lambeth Bridge’s urbane classical appearance is a landmark on the Thames and the bridge has an interesting mix of stone and steel and a graceful arched profile. The bridge also has special historic interest as part of the continuum of river crossings at a place where Londoners have traversed the Thames since the C13. Of further historic note is the symbolism of the ornamentation on the bridge celebrating the LCC and the reign of George V. The red paint is a further point of note, and links the bridge to the unique ensemble of political institutions on this stretch of the Thames. The list description notes that the bridge has group value with Westminster Bridge and Vauxhall Bridge. Furthermore, the bridge is sited near a number of listed buildings including Lambeth Palace (grade I), the Palace of Westminster (grade I), the Church of St. Mary in Lambeth (grade II*) and the contemporary Norwest and Thames Houses of 1928 which frame the northern approach to the bridge (both grade II). Lambeth Bridge also forms part of Albert Embankment. The Albert Embankment CA Appraisal highlights that the River Thames and its riverside walk are a significant element of the conservation area’s heritage value and provide the best public viewpoints from which to appreciate the Westminster World Heritage Site (WHS) and bridges including Lambeth Bridge, Vauxhall Bridge and Westminster Bridge.

New linear LED graze fittings will be mounted across the length of the bridge in the same location as existing redundant fluorescent fittings to illuminate the face of the bridge. Custom made baffles will be mounted on the fittings to control the spread of light and minimise spill into the river.

On the underside of each arch, floodlights will be used to illuminate the structure. In addition, further spotlights will be used to illuminate the face of the piers. The proposed illumination of Lambeth Bridge will adopt soft red tones to reflect the red leather seats in the House of Lords.

There are a pair of existing feeder pillars on the South side of the bridge. TFL's investigations reported to the applicant suggest the larger of these is now redundant but is still equipped with a service head. The intention will be to replace the existing feeder pillar with a like for like replacement and to re-instate the UKPN supply to supply a new distribution board which will serve the new lighting.

A TFL owned room has been identified beneath Lambeth Bridge on the South side to which access has not yet been available. However, assuming there is sufficient space within this room it is proposed that the computer controllers will be located here within an equipment rack. If the room has insufficient space the alternative will be to install a new feeder pillar housing the control equipment, this would be located adjacent to the existing power feeder pillar on the south side. The new controls feeder pillar would be no taller than the existing. A condition is recommended that details of fixing method used, details of lighting to be removed/retained and paint schedule for any prominent light fittings, installation methodology and electrical cabling and equipment are submitted prior to commencement

Luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge is currently free from artistic lighting. The transience of the light colour change and intensity will be conditioned, to ensure that it is appropriate and does not appear unduly prominent on completion.

There would be a visual assimilation with the listed bridge and the proposed lighting scheme achieved through a colour scheme, which would match or complement the structure the details to be secured by condition.

The siting, size and form of the proposed luminaires and other associated works, would be discreet and minimal. The siting, orientation and scope of the luminaires are an appropriate response to the architectural character of the Bridge. It is considered that the proposal would enhance an appreciation of Lambeth Bridge and allow for a better appreciation of its architectural significance. It is concluded that the effect of the proposed illumination of Lambeth Bridge would be beneficial. It would enhance the special interest of Lambeth Bridge, and the ability to appreciate that interest, and its setting. Overall, it is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would not harm the special interest or significance of the listed Lambeth Bridge, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

6.2.21 Impact on Statutory Listed Buildings and World Heritage Site

Westminster World Heritage Site – no harm to setting. Albert Embankment Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. Smith Square Conservation Area - enhancement to setting. Lambeth Palace Conservation Area - no harm to setting. Lambeth Palace Complex (grade I) – no harm to setting. St Mary’s Church (grade II*) – no harm to setting.

Norwest House and Thames House (grade II) – no harm to setting. Telephone Kiosk, Albert Embankment (grade II) – no harm to setting. Thames Retaining Wall and Lamps (grade II) – no harm to setting. St Thomas’ Hospital (grade II) – no harm to setting.

6.2.22 Impact on Non Designated Heritage Assets (local heritage list)

Lambeth Pier – no harm to setting.

6.2.23 Views

The bridge is the viewing location for LVMF View 19A; the proposal will not affect this. The bridge is visible in LVMF 18.A – the proposal will be visible at night and will be an enhancement to the view.

6.2.24 Assessment of Harm versus benefit

No harm has been identified.

6.2.25 Historic England

Have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. They consider that the scheme reflects their discussions and the advice offered by their specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion. They advise the application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

They have authorised the Council to determine the application for listed building consent as we see fit.

6.2.26 Application 3: Westminster Bridge (grade II*)

6.2.27 Impact on the Special Interest and Significance of Westminster Bridge

The significance of the (grade II*) designated heritage asset is of relevance in the consideration of this application.

The heritage value of the bridge lies in its historic and architectural value as a surviving Victorian gothic bridge and an important historic river crossing in central London and within the setting of the Westminster World Heritage Site. On the underside of each arch, two sets of floodlights will be used, one to backlight the steel lattice structure and another to illuminate the underside of the arch structure. In addition, a string of LED node points will be installed on both faces of the bridge below the balustrade level behind the existing shields, to replace the existing redundant incandescent lamps.

The proposed illumination of Westminster Bridge will adopt soft green tones to reflect the green leather seats in the House of Commons. The drivers will be grouped for all the luminaires between the bridge on each pier adjacent to the existing access walkways. The computer controllers will be located within the existing switch room beneath the statue on the north side within a dedicated control rack.

The fixtures and fittings required for the proposed illumination are located in discrete locations and/or utilise existing light fittings within the bridge structure to ensure minimal visual impact of the fixtures and fittings during the day time. A condition is recommended that details of fixing method used, details of lighting to be removed/retained and paint schedule for any prominent light fittings, installation methodology and electrical cabling and equipment are submitted prior to commencement

The proposed illumination will subtly illuminate the architectural features of the bridge; including the latticework of the arches and the lining of the deck below the balustrades, whilst ensuring the existing lamp standards remain a prominent feature along the footways of the bridge. The existing lamp standards and navigational lighting will not be changed by the proposed illumination.

Luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge is currently free from artistic lighting. The transience of the light colour change and intensity will be secured by conditioned, to ensure that it is appropriate and does not appear unduly prominent on completion.

There would be a visual assimilation with the listed bridge and the proposed lighting scheme achieved through a colour scheme, which would match or complement the structure the details to be secured by condition.

The siting, size and form of the proposed luminaires and other associated works, would be discreet and minimal. The siting, orientation and scope of the luminaires are an appropriate response to the architectural character of the Bridge. It is considered that the proposal would enhance an appreciation of Westminster Bridge and allow for a better appreciation of its architectural significance. It is concluded that the effect of the proposed illumination of Westminster Bridge would be beneficial. It would enhance the special interest of Westminster Bridge, and the ability to appreciate that interest, and its setting.

Overall, it is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would not harm the special interest or significance of the listed Westminster Bridge, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

6.2.28 Impact on Designated Heritage Assets Westminster World Heritage Site – no harm. The County Hall (grade II*) – no harm to setting. Thames Retaining Wall and Lamps (grade II) – no harm to setting. St Thomas’ Hospital (grade II) – no harm to setting. Boudica Statue (grade II) – no harm to setting. New Scotland Yard (grade I) – no harm to setting. Southbank Lion (Grade II) – no harm to setting. Albert Embankment Conservation Area – enhance appearance. Westminster Abbey and Parliament Square Conservation Area – enhance appearance. Smith Square Conservation Area – enhance appearance. Southbank Conservation Area – enhance appearance.

6.2.29 Non Designated Heritage Assets

No adverse impacts.

6.2.30 Views

Westminster Bridge is the view location for LVMF 18.A and 18.B. The proposals will not affect the bridge as a viewing location. The bridge is visible in LVMF views 17.A and 19.A; these views will be enhanced by the illumination.

6.2.31 Assessment of Harm versus benefit

No harm has been identified.

6.2.32 Historic England

Have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. They consider that the scheme reflects their discussions and the advice offered by their specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion. They advise the application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

They have authorised the Council to determine the application for listed building consent as we see fit.

6.2.33 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge (grade II*)

6.2.34 Impact on the Special Interest and Significance of Waterloo Bridge

The significance of the (grade II*) designated heritage asset is of relevance in the consideration of this application.

The proposed illumination will express the architectural details of the five shallow span arches, which consist of two parallel reinforced concrete arches supporting a reinforced concrete beamed deck. The proposed illumination will wash the Portland stone facing of the arches in colour, activating the bridge as a canvas to create visual interest and celebrate the presence of this historic bridge at the apex of the principal bend of the River Thames in central London.

Unlike the proposals for the other bridges the new linear LED graze fittings will be mounted on the face of the bridge stonework below balustrade level. These fittings will be within purpose made housing supported from the existing bridge handrails. Custom made light shields will be mounted on the fittings to control the spread of light and minimise spill into the river. On the underside of the bridge, floodlights will be mounted at the base of each arch to wash the underside of the concrete arches. On each pier, sets of floodlights will be mounted from the walkway and aimed to light the internal faces of the arch structure. Additional LED floodlights are proposed to replace the existing ones over the bookstalls on the south bank to allow the colour temperature to in tune with the artwork.

The fixtures and fittings required for the proposed Illumination are located in discrete locations within the bridge structure to ensure minimal visual impact of the fixtures and fittings during the day time. The steel guard rails will be used for installing the fixtures and fittings used to illuminate the faces of the bridge to minimise impacts on the bridge structure and stone clad facades. A condition is recommended that details of fixing method used, details of lighting to be removed/retained and paint schedule for any prominent light fittings, are submitted prior to commencement.

The drivers for the LED Linear Graze luminaires are proposed to be located within the hollow structure of the bridge in both pavements on the bridge deck. The proposal is to create small accessible chambers adjacent to the existing access hatches in which to locate the drivers. The drivers could then be accessed from the pathway beneath a manhole cover.

The main cable routes would be within the hollow voids of the bridge. The cabling for the under bridge floodlights would pass out from the voids to the pier locations using existing penetrations. The cabling for the LED Linear Graze fittings would be routed in the voids to the new access pits located in the pavement. From these pit positions cabling would be concealed in conduit routed the short distance to the handrail. A condition is recommended that final details electrical cabling and equipment are submitted prior to commencement.

There is an existing electrical switch room located on the north side of the bridge to the rear of the nightclub under the first arch. This switch room supplies the current bridge lighting and it is understood that there is spare capacity within the existing supply.

The proposed Illumination of Waterloo Bridge will adopt constantly changing colours ranging from purple, blue and amber. The applicant in their documents indicate that the levels of luminance will remain very similar to the existing lighting of the bridge arches. The transience of the light colour change and intensity will be secured by conditioned, to ensure that it is appropriate and does not appear unduly prominent on completion.

There would be a visual assimilation with the listed bridge and the proposed lighting scheme achieved through a colour scheme, which would match or complement the structure the details to be secured by condition.

The proposed Illumination will complement the sleek, robust and elegant design of the bridge. The bridge is an integral element of the Victoria Embankment and the South Bank and the proposed illumination would celebrate the bridge as a historic link between these two character areas.

The siting, size and form of the proposed luminaires and other associated works, would be discreet and minimal. The siting, orientation and scope of the luminaires are an appropriate response to the architectural character of the Bridge. It is considered that the proposal would enhance an appreciation of Waterloo Bridge and allow for a better appreciation of its architectural significance. It is concluded that the effect of the proposed illumination of Waterloo Bridge would be beneficial. It would enhance the special interest of Waterloo, and the ability to appreciate that interest, and its setting. Overall, it is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would not harm the special interest or significance of the listed Westminster Bridge, in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

6.2.35 Impact on Designated Heritage Assets

Southbank Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. Savoy Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. Strand Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. National Theatre – Grade II* - no harm to setting. Somerset House (grade I) – no harm to setting.

River retaining Wall and lamps (grade II) – no harm to setting. Royal Festival Hall (Grade I) – no harm to setting.

6.2.36 Impact on Non Designated Heritage Assets

QEH, Purcell Rooms, Hayward Gallery Complex – no harm to setting.

6.2.37 Views

Waterloo bridge is the viewing location for LVMF views 15.A and 15.B. The proposal will not affect this viewing location. The bridge appears in views 16.A and 17.B; the illumination will enhance these views.

6.2.38 Assessment of Harm versus benefit

No harm has been identified.

6.2.39 Historic England

Have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. They consider that the scheme reflects their discussions and the advice offered by their specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion. They advise the application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

They have authorised the Council to determine the application for listed building consent as we see fit.

6.2.40 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridges

6.2.41 Impact on Golden Jubilee footbridge as a non-designated asset.

The existing Golden Jubilee Footbridges include decorative lighting that illuminates the balustrades lining the pedestrian decks in an indigo/purple light and the pillars and suspension cables in a white light, navigational lighting is positioned under the decks of the bridges and the lights of trains moving across the bridge are also often visible. The proposed illumination would include new linear LED graze fittings that will be mounted continuously across the length of the bridge to wash the vertical face of the bridge deck. The existing lighting on the bridge will be retained including the balustrade lights and the spotlights mounted to the structure. The existing lighting will be re-connected to allow control from the new lighting system. It would introduce a more coherent decorative lighting scheme and the alterations and improvements to the current decorative lighting scheme have been informed by the architects who designed the bridges. The proposed illumination of the Golden Jubilee Footbridges will adopt white tones.

On the Golden Jubilee Footbridges, bespoke fittings are to be mounted inside the existing balustrade uprights, replacing an existing light fitting in the same location. Details are still to be confirmed but the new fitting is expected to reuse existing fixing holes, without requiring further structural design. A condition is recommended that details of fixing method used, details of lighting to be removed/retained and paint schedule for any prominent light fittings, installation methodology are submitted prior to commencement

Both bridges have existing distribution boards built into the wall adjacent to the lifts on the south side. It is understood from the applicant that there is sufficient spare ways in these existing boards to supply the new lighting.

As there are no existing switchroom locations, the computer controllers will be located within a new feeder pillar enclosure which is proposed to be located beneath the eastern bridge. The final location of this will need to be agreed. (Typical Feeder Pillar Dims - 1800m w x 1500mm h x 500mm d). A condition is recommended that final details electrical cabling, housing and equipment are submitted prior to commencement.

The applicant advises that the existing artistic lighting will be retained, and therefore luminance at the face of the bridge and levels of light spill will be largely unchanged. The transience of the light colour change and intensity will be secured by conditioned, to ensure that it is appropriate and does not appear unduly prominent on completion.

The siting, orientation and scope of the luminaires are an appropriate response to the architectural character of the Bridge. It is considered that the proposal would enhance an appreciation of Golden Jubilee Footbridges. Overall, it is considered that the siting, orientation, size and character of the luminaires would conserve and enhance the significance of the Golden Jubilee Footbridges,in accordance with Section 16 of the Act and relevant policies in the NPPF, London Plan, and Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

6.2.42 Impact on Designated Heritage Assets

Whitehall Conservation Area - enhancement to appearance. Savoy Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. Southbank Conservation Area – enhancement to appearance. Royal Festival Hall (grade I) – no harm to setting. County Hall (grade II*) – no harm to setting. River retaining Wall and lamps (grade II) – no harm to setting.

6.2.43 Impact on Non Designated heritage Assets

River retaining Wall, railing and lamps – no harm to setting.

6.2.44 Views Hungerford Footbridges are the viewing locations for LVMF views 17.A and 17.B. These viewing locations will not be affected by the proposal. Hungerford footbridges appear in LVMF views 15.A, 18.A, 20.B and 21.B. The proposal will enhance these views.

6.2.45 Assessment of Harm versus benefit

No harm has been identified.

6.2.46 Historic England

Have been involved with pre-application discussions on this scheme, which seeks to draw attention to some of London’s most well-known heritage assets and, in the Thames, one of its most important public spaces. They consider that the scheme reflects their discussions and the advice offered by their specialist staff. Historic England, therefore, do not wish to offer any comments on this occasion. They advise the application should be determined in accordance with national and local policy guidance, and on the basis of your specialist conservation advice.

6.2.47 Overall

In views where the bridges are seen together with other bridges, including Lambeth Bridge, the bridges would be unified by the kinetic movement of the proposed Illumination, whilst maintaining individual identities through the use of subtle differences in colours of light and lighting that accentuates the different architectural features of the bridges. In particular, Lambeth Bridge’s group value with Westminster Bridge would be enhanced through the bridges expressing the relevant colours of the House of Lords (red) and the House of Commons (green) within the setting of the Westminster WHS.

In summary, it is considered that the proposal would preserve the special architectural and historic interest and significance of the listed bridges and not harm the setting of designated heritage assets in accordance with section 16 and 66 of the Town Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, policies in the NPPF, London Plan Policy 7.8, Lambeth Local Plan Policies, Q19, Q20, Q21 and Q22.

6.3 Amenity

6.3.1 Local Plan Policy Q2 (Amenity) seeks to protect the amenity of existing neighbours and the visual amenity of the community as a whole.

6.3.2 Light Spill

6.3.3 Application 1 - Vauxhall Bridge

The south bank either side of Vauxhall Bridge is developed with both commercial and residential properties including the MI6 building and the St George’s Wharf (residential above commercial). The applicants Vauxhall Bridge Design Statement indicates that on average this bank experiences luminance levels between 5-10 cd/m² but there are areas of higher brightness from some of the lit buildings for example the building Luminance Level (cd/m²) for MI6 Building - 20, the Tower, ST George Wharf – 25.

It is noted at table 3.3 of chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement that the existing average luminance on the face of the bridge is 0 cd/m2, target luminance level on face of Bridge would be 20 cd/m2. Typical light spill from existing light into river is 2 Lux, illustrative Lux Level at water surface for purposes of assessment <6 Lux. The luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge is currently unlit except for road lighting on its deck. Light spill levels will remain at low levels. It is proposed that Vauxhall Bridge would be lit between dusk to dawn. As there is no existing bridge ‘light-up’ hours, this operational time has been chosen to ensure the proposed illumination is in keeping with the adjacent bridges.

The proposed illumination would be tailored specifically to the context of the bridge and its surroundings to minimise light spill. A number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. All downward facing lights would be controlled to avoid direct lighting on the River Thames. In most cases, this would be achieved using a light shield. Light shields would be custom fitted for each position to optimise light cut off location. Where the use of a light shield is not possible due to the mounting of the light fitting at a close offset to the side of the bridge, light spill would be controlled through use of a lower powered fitting. Conditions are recommended regarding lighting to control illumination on sensitive receptors.

6.3.4 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge

The south bank either side of Lambeth Bridge along Albert Embankment is developed with some commercial and residential properties on the west side of the bridge and Lambeth Palace to the east side. The buildings on Albert Embankment to the south are relatively low luminance with much tree cover on the bank side.

It is noted at table 3.3 of chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement that the existing average luminance on the face of the bridge is 0 cd/m2, target luminance level on face of bridge is 15 cd/m2. Typical light spill from existing light into river 3 Lux, illustrative Lux Level at water surface for purposes of assessment <6 Lux. The luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge currently has no lighting other than road lighting on its deck. Light spill levels will remain at low levels.

It is proposed that Lambeth Bridge would be lit between dusk to dawn. As there is no existing bridge ‘light-up’ hours, this operational time has been chosen to ensure the proposed illumination is in keeping with the adjacent bridges.

The proposed illumination would be tailored specifically to the context of the bridge and its surroundings to minimise light spill. A number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. All downward facing lights would be controlled to avoid direct lighting on the River Thames. In most cases, this would be achieved using a light shield. Light shields would be custom fitted for each position to optimise light cut off location. Where the use of a light shield is not possible due to the mounting of the light fitting at a close offset to the side of the bridge, light spill would be controlled through use of a lower powered fitting. Conditions are recommended regarding lighting to control illumination on sensitive receptors. 6.3.5 Application 3: Westminster Bridge

The south bank either side of Westminster Bridge is developed with St Thomas’s Hospital, County Hall, London Eye and the Shell building. The applicant’s Westminster Bridge Design Statement indicates the Luminance Level (cd/m²) for County Hall – 10, London Eye - 20 and Shell building - 20.

It is noted at table 3.3 of chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement that the existing average luminance on face of the bridge is 0 cd/m2, target luminance level on face of Bridge 15 cd/m2. Typical light spill from existing light into river 1 Lux, illustrative Lux Level at water surface for purposes of assessment <6 Lux. The luminance levels on the face of the bridge will increase as the bridge is currently unlit except for road lighting on its deck. Light spill levels at the sides of bridges will remain as this is primarily caused by deck road lighting. Lighting will be introduced to underside of bridge which is currently unlit, creating low levels of light spill.

It is proposed that Westminster Bridge would be lit between dusk to dawn. As there is no existing bridge ‘light-up’ hours, this operational time has been chosen to ensure the proposed illumination is in keeping with the adjacent bridges.

The proposed illumination would be tailored specifically to the context of the bridge and its surroundings to minimise light spill. A number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. All downward facing lights would be controlled to avoid direct lighting on the River Thames. In most cases, this would be achieved using a light shield. Light shields would be custom fitted for each position to optimise light cut off location. Where the use of a light shield is not possible due to the mounting of the light fitting at a close offset to the side of the bridge, light spill would be controlled through use of a lower powered fitting. Conditions are recommended regarding lighting to control illumination on sensitive receptors.

6.3.6 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge

The Southbank either side of Golden Jubilee Footbridge is developed with many illuminated buildings, the Southbank Centre, National theatre, Festival Pier, Royal Festival Hall, Shell building and London eye. The applicants Golden Jubilee Footbridge Design Statement indicates the Luminance Level (cd/m²) for National Theatre – 12, Festival Pier – 17, Royal Festival Hall – 22, London Eye - 20 and Shell building - 20.

It is noted at table 3.3 of chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement indicates that the existing average luminance on the face of Bridge 15 cd/m2, target luminance level on face of bridge 15 cd/m2. Typical light spill from existing light into river 4 Lux, illustrative Lux Level at water surface for purposes of assessment <6 Lux. The existing lighting will be largely retained and therefore luminance at the face of the bridge and levels of light spill remain largely unchanged.

It is proposed that Golden Jubilee footbridge would be lit between dusk to dawn. The operational times of the lighting installation will be kept to existing bridge ‘light-up’ hours. The proposed illumination would be tailored specifically to the context of the bridge and its surroundings to minimise light spill. A number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. All downward facing lights would be controlled to avoid direct lighting on the River Thames. In most cases, this would be achieved using a light shield. Light shields would be custom fitted for each position to optimise light cut off location. Where the use of a light shield is not possible due to the mounting of the light fitting at a close offset to the side of the bridge, light spill would be controlled through use of a lower powered fitting. Conditions are recommended regarding lighting to control illumination on sensitive receptors.

6.3.7 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge

The Southbank either side of Golden Jubilee Footbridge is developed with many illuminated buildings, National Theatre, Festival Pier, Royal Festival Hall, and Shell building. The applicants Golden Jubilee Footbridge Design Statement indicates the Luminance Level (cd/m²) for National Theatre – 12, Festival Pier – 17, Royal Festival Hall – 22, and Shell building - 20.

It is noted at table 3.3 of chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement that the existing average luminance on face of the bridge 0 cd/m2, arches 20 cd/m2; target luminance level on face of bridge 20 cd/m2. Typical light spill from existing light into river 1 Lux, illustrative Lux Level at water surface for purposes of assessment <5 Lux. The luminance levels remain similar to existing bridge arches. Existing light spill is largely a result of the existing artistic lighting which will be replaced. Lighting will be introduced to underside of bridge which is currently unlit, creating low levels of light spill.

It is proposed that Golden Jubilee footbridge would be lit between dusk to dawn. The operational times of the lighting installation will be kept to existing bridge ‘light-up’ hours.

The proposed illumination would be tailored specifically to the context of the bridge and its surroundings to minimise light spill. A number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. All downward facing lights would be controlled to avoid direct lighting on the River Thames. In most cases, this would be achieved using a light shield. Light shields would be custom fitted for each position to optimise light cut off location. Where the use of a light shield is not possible due to the mounting of the light fitting at a close offset to the side of the bridge, light spill would be controlled through use of a lower powered fitting. Conditions are recommended regarding lighting to control illumination on sensitive receptors.

6.3.8 Overall

The bridges can be classed as being within an urban setting with distinct brightness. Many of the bridges, even those with no decorative/artistic lighting are currently producing some light spill into the River Thames from the street lights on the bridge deck.

The lighting scheme for each bridge has been designed so that luminaries would be directed at the bridge structures themselves and a number of measures have been adopted to ensure any effects associated with light spill are minimised. As noted above the majority of the bridges are located in areas where there is already a significant amount of illumination from surrounding buildings. Conditions are recommended that a lighting scheme is submitted to control illumination on sensitive receptors.

6.3.9 Noise and Vibration

6.3.10 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

The operation of the proposed illumination is unlikely to result in any changes to the noise environment. On the basis of the light-up hours and as indicated earlier it is not considered that the proposal would draw large crowds to gather, it is not considered that there is potential for significant increases in noise and vibration associated with any increase in footfall around the five bridges.

The applicant has submitted a Framework Code of Construction Practice which indicates measures to reduce noise and vibration impacts. It also indicates that the applicant would apply for a section 61 consent of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 (application is made to the local authority for consent to carry out works, which are likely to have an impact on the surrounding area due to its generation of noise and vibration). This outlines methods in place to minimise disruption to the surrounding area.

It should be noted that the applicant advises within supporting documents that wherever possible, the fixing of luminaries to the individual bridges will be achieved using clamps and ties which do not require any penetration of the existing structure and hence are not anticipated to create high noise levels during installation.

In certain locations, the applicant advises within supporting documents that it may be necessary to drill new mounting anchors into existing stonework or concrete. However, even where drilling is required, measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will ensure effects are minimised. Some night-time working will be required. Given the short- term nature of the works installation is not expected to exceed 12 weeks, followed by a four week commissioning period) and the existing high levels of background noise, it is not considered that there is potential for significant noise and vibration effects during installation.

Noise, disturbance and inconvenience during the construction period can be mitigated through the provision of a final detailed Code of Construction Practice. Which should include details of the construction programme which identifies activities likely to cause high levels of noise or dust, showing location of potential noisy equipment, including identifying sensitive receptors and ongoing monitoring. To be secured via condition.

The delivery of the project would be phased, phase 2 anticipated Autumn 2019 to Spring 2020 would include the illumination of Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge and Application 5: Waterloo Bridge. Phase 3 anticipated Autumn 2020 to Spring 2021 the illumination of Application 3: Westminster Bridge, Application 2: Lambeth Bridge and Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge. Given this, how the fixings will be achieved to each individual bridge and conditions securing the provision of a detailed code of construction plan (for each application, Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) and a further condition imposed that noise from any mechanical equipment or building services plant shall not exceed the background noise level L90B(A) 15 minutes, would seek to minimise any impact on amenity in terms of noise and disturbance.

6.3.11 Air Quality

6.3.12 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge. In terms of air quality the whole of Lambeth is designated as an Air Quality Management Area. The access and installation strategy will employ a number of methods such as abseiling, scaffolding, and use of suspended platforms, scissor lifts and maintenance cradles dependent on the individual bridge constraints. Wherever possible, the fixing of luminaries to the individual bridges will be achieved using clamps and ties which do not require any penetration of the existing structure. In certain locations, it will be necessary to drill new mounting anchors into existing stonework or concrete. Therefore, in these instances, there is potential for dust raising activities to increase dust soiling / deposition. However, measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice (Environmental Statement Appendix GEN.04, Volume 4), will ensure that appropriate techniques are adopted to prevent dust emission, including dust deposition into the River Thames. Conditions are recommended that detailed installation methodologies and Code of Construction Practice are submitted for each Application (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) to mitigate any impacts with regards to air quality.

6.4 Transport

6.4.1 Policy T6 seeks to ensure that the development does not have an unacceptable impact upon transport capacity and infrastructure. The policy requires developments not to cause unacceptable harm to either public or private transport networks or have an adverse impact on transport safety.

6.4.2 Policy T5 of the Local Plan supports and promotes the use of the River Thames as a strategic transport route for passengers and freight.

6.4.3 Application 1 - Vauxhall Bridge

Vauxhall Bridge forms a key highways link and forms part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) / Red Route. The existing lighting mounted on piers at both high and low levels will be removed to prevent a clash with the new lighting. The access and installation methodology will primarily employ abseilers, safety boat, and moog truck to install the new light fittings. Works will be coordinated with the Thames Tideway project working on the southern side of the bridge.

The Council’s Transport officer has raised no objection subject to conditions. They advise that any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning.

They indicate that the measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours.

They advise that officers may wish to include a condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. It should be noted whilst no condition has been imposed specifically regarding Candelas, various conditions are recommended to control illumination. They have also recommended that a construction management plan be submitted. In this regard a condition is recommended that a detailed Code of Construction Practice is submitted prior to commencement to ensure any potential traffic and transport effects during installation are minimised. The Council’s capital programmes and highways officer has looked at the proposal and advised that Vauxhall Bridge is owned and maintained by TfL. TfL (Surface Asset Investment Sponsorship) were consulted and support the proposals and are working with the applicant to develop the details of the operational and asset whole life cost requirements, which need to be considered and signed off before any of the works commencing on site. A condition is recommended that the detailed proposals be reviewed and agreed in writing by TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority prior to any of the works being undertaken on site. Asset Owner permission should be sought before physical works can go ahead. An informative to this effect is recommended.

6.4.4 River Traffic: The applicant has considered how the proposal would impact on river traffic and has been in close liaison with the Port of London Authority (PLA) on this matter.

Subject to the securing of conditions indicated below, the impacts on the river and river users would be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development. Conditions are required regarding, a detailed phasing plan, including detailed installation methodologies, timings, detailed Code of Construction Practice, maintenance and decommissioning plan be submitted for approval.

In terms of illumination they advise a condition be included that a spill light survey and luminance survey be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement are being exceeded. The removal of redundant lighting is welcomed and details of how this will be done to be conditioned.

It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. To be secured by conditioned. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. An informative to this affect is recommended.

6.4.5 Application 2: Lambeth Bridge

Lambeth Bridge forms a key highways link and forms part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) / Red Route. The existing redundant lighting will be removed and the existing pier uplights will be removed to make way for the new luminaires. The access and installation methodology will primarily employ abseilers and use of safety boat to install the new light fittings.

The Council’s Transport officer has raised no objection subject to conditions. They advise that any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning.

They indicate that the measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours. They advise that officers may wish to include a condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. It should be noted whilst no condition has been imposed specifically regarding Candelas, various conditions are recommended to control illumination. They have also recommended that a construction management plan be submitted. In this regard a condition is recommended that a detailed Code of Construction Practice be submitted to ensure any potential traffic and transport effects during installation are minimised.

The Council’s capital programmes and highways officer has looked at the proposal and advised that Lambeth Bridge is owned and maintained by TfL. TfL (Surface Asset Investment Sponsorship) were consulted and support the proposals and are working with the applicant to develop the details of the operational and asset whole life cost requirements, which need to be considered and signed off before any of the works commencing on site. Condition is recommended that the detailed proposals be reviewed and agreed in writing by TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority prior to any of the works being undertaken on site. Asset Owner permission should be sought before physical works can go ahead. An informative to this effect is recommended.

6.4.6 River Traffic: The applicant has considered how the proposal would impact on river traffic and has been in close liaison with the Port of London Authority (PLA) on this matter.

Subject to the securing of conditions indicated below, the impacts on the river and river users would be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development. Conditions are required regarding, a detailed phasing plan, including detailed installation methodologies, timings, detailed Code of Construction Practice, maintenance and decommissioning plan be submitted for approval.

In terms of illumination they advise a condition be included that a spill light survey and luminance survey be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement are being exceeded. The removal of redundant lighting is welcomed and details of how this will be done to be conditioned.

It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. To be secured by conditioned. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. An informative to this affect is recommended.

6.4.7 Application 3: Westminster Bridge

Westminster Bridge forms a key highways link and forms part of the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) / Red Route. The Proposed Illumination would not alter the existing roadway lanterns and safety lights they will be retained. No other lighting will be removed to facilitate the installation. The access and installation methodology will primarily employ abseilers to install the new light fittings, safety boat and moog trucks. The Council’s Transport officer has raised no objection subject to conditions. They advise that any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning.

They indicate that the measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours.

They advise that officers may wish to include a condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. It should be noted whilst no condition has been imposed specifically regarding Candelas, various conditions are recommended to control illumination. They have also recommended that a construction management plan be submitted. In this regard a condition is recommended that a detailed Code of Construction Practice be submitted to ensure any potential traffic and transport effects during installation are minimised.

The Council’s capital programmes and highways officer has looked at the proposal and advised that Lambeth Bridge is owned and maintained by TfL. TfL (Surface Asset Investment Sponsorship) were consulted and support the proposals and are working with the applicant to develop the details of the operational and asset whole life cost requirements, which need to be considered and signed off before any of the works commencing on site. A condition is recommended that the detailed proposals be reviewed and agreed in writing by TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority prior to any of the works being undertaken on site. Asset Owner permission should be sought before physical works can go ahead. An informative to this effect is recommended.

6.4.8 River Traffic: The applicant has considered how the proposal would impact on river traffic and has been in close liaison with the Port of London Authority (PLA) on this matter.

Subject to the securing of conditions indicated below, the impacts on the river and river users would appear to be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development. Conditions are required regarding, a detailed phasing plan, including detailed installation methodologies, timings, detailed Code of Construction Practice, maintenance and decommissioning plan be submitted for approval.

In terms of illumination they advise a condition be included that a spill light survey and luminance survey be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement are being exceeded. The removal of redundant lighting is welcomed and details of how this will be done to be conditioned.

It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. To be secured by condition. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. An informative to this affect is recommended. 6.4.9 Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge

Golden Jubilee Footbridge is owned by Westminster City Council and Lambeth Council. Lambeth is the local highway authority for the area in which the Golden Jubilee Bridges are situated up to the midpoint of River Thames from its South Bank. Westminster is the local highway authority for the area in which the Golden Jubilee Bridges are situated up to the midpoint of River Thames from its South Bank. Although, Lambeth own part of this bridge Westminster maintain this bridge and Lambeth contribute part of the total maintenance cost.

No existing lighting will require removal to facilitate the installation. It is currently assumed that the access and installation strategy will primarily employ abseilers safety boat, and scissor lift to install the new light fittings.

The Council’s Transport officer has raised no objection subject to conditions. They advise that any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning.

They indicate that the measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours.

They advise that officers may wish to include a condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. It should be noted whilst no condition has been imposed specifically regarding Candelas, various conditions are recommended to control illumination. They have recommended that a construction management plan be submitted. In this regard a condition is recommended that a detailed Code of Construction Practice be submitted to ensure any potential traffic and transport effects during installation are minimised.

The Council’s capital programmes and highways officer has looked at the proposal and advised that Westminster is lead authority for this bridge and should review the proposal. They were consulted on the application and made no comment subject to a condition(s) requiring implementation occur over the entirety of the bridge. It is noted that Westminster Council have approved their respective planning application and listed building consent for this bridge.

6.4.10 River Traffic: The applicant has considered how the proposal would impact on river traffic and has been in close liaison with the Port of London Authority (PLA) on this matter.

Subject to the securing of conditions indicated below, the impacts on the river and river users would appear to be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development. Conditions are required regarding, a detailed phasing plan, including detailed installation methodologies, timings, detailed Code of Construction Practice, maintenance and decommissioning plan be submitted for approval.

In terms of illumination they advise a condition be included that a spill light survey and luminance survey be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement are being exceeded. The removal of redundant lighting is welcomed and details of how this will be done to be conditioned. It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. To be secured by condition. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. An informative to this affect is recommended.

6.4.11 Application 5: Waterloo Bridge

6.4.12 Waterloo Bridge is owned by Westminster City Council. However, part of the structure is maintained by Lambeth and Tfl. Mainly pedestrian subways. From the first expansion joint to second expansion maintained by Lambeth.

6.4.13 The existing floodlights will be switched off as part of the proposal. It is currently assumed that the access and installation strategy will primarily employ abseilers, safety boat, moog trucks, scissor lift, and maintenance ladder to install the new light fittings.

6.4.14 The Council’s Transport officer has raised no objection subject to conditions. They advise that any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning.

6.4.15 They indicate that the measures set out in the Framework Code of Construction Practice will help ensure that any installation effects are minimised. All access for the installation works will be gained via the bridge deck, hence, there are no local footway or highway considerations. Installation works, particularly closures, will be scheduled to avoid peak hours.

They advise that officers may wish to include a condition to control the level of Candelas per meter squared. It should be noted whilst no condition has been imposed specifically regarding Candelas, various conditions are recommended to control illumination. They have recommended that a construction management plan be submitted. In this regard a condition is recommended that a detailed Code of Construction Practice be submitted to ensure any potential traffic and transport effects during installation are minimised.

The Council’s capital programmes and highways officer has looked at the proposal and advised that Golden Jubilee Footbridge is owned by Westminster Council and they should review the proposal. Westminster were consulted on the application and made no comment subject to a condition(s) requiring implementation occur over the entirety of the bridge. It is noted that Westminster Council have approved their respective planning application and listed building consent for this bridge.

6.4.16 River Traffic: The applicant has considered how the proposal would impact on river traffic and has been in close liaison with the Port of London Authority (PLA) on this matter.

Subject to the securing of conditions indicated below, the impacts on the river and river users would appear to be acceptable and the PLA has no objection to the proposed development. Conditions are required regarding, a detailed phasing plan, including detailed installation methodologies, timings, detailed Code of Construction Practice, maintenance and decommissioning plan be submitted for approval. In terms of illumination they advise a condition be included that a spill light survey and luminance survey be undertaken again on completion of each phase of the project and a report submitted showing compliance against the levels set out in tables 3.3.a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement. The condition should provide the opportunity to require the lighting to be adjusted if the levels set out in tables 3.3a and 3.3b, Volume 2, Chapter 3 of the Environmental Statement are being exceeded. The removal of redundant lighting is welcomed and details of how this will be done to be conditioned.

It will be important to ensure that there is no conflict between the proposed lighting and the standard navigational lighting for open/closed arches. This will require the carrying out of trials to ensure continued visibility of the navigational lighting and to establish if there is any potential electromagnetic interference. To be secured by condition. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the PLA’s existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime. An informative to this affect is recommended.

6.4.17 Overall

The delivery of the project would be phased, phase 2 anticipated Autumn 2019 to Spring 2020 would include the illumination of Application 4:Golden Jubilee Footbridge and Application 5:Waterloo Bridge. Phase 3 anticipated Autumn 2020 to Spring 2021 the illumination of Application 3: Westminster Bridge, Application 2: Lambeth Bridge and Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge. Any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning. Subject to condition that a detailed Code of Construction Practice be submitted for each bridge the proposal is considered to be acceptable.

The applicant indicates in supporting documents that the installation would not create a one – off attraction. There are no specific points for crowds to linger and the option to see multiple bridges at once is limited, thereby encouraging people to keep walking along the banks and across the bridges, due to the transience of the light it is unlikely to cause people to linger in the way that projected images or a light show would.

In terms of river traffic it is considered that subject to conditions the impacts on the river and river users would appear to be acceptable.

6.5 Ecology and Biodiversity

6.5.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

Policy EN1 relates to open space requirements within the borough and in relation to new development it seeks to ensure the protection of valuable existing habitats and to maximise opportunities for creating or adding to biodiversity.

The Environmental Statement assesses the likely significant effects of the proposed installation and illumination in relation to ecology. It assesses the impact by ecological receptors which is more robust. As discussed at section 6.9 below, the environmental information submitted in support of the proposed development is considered sufficient for LBL to determine the application. 6.5.2 The Key ecological receptors within Lambeth borough application Sites are:

 River Thames and tidal Tributaries SINC: Described in the ES as, SINC covers the tidal stretch of the River Thames. Applies to all bridges.

 Victoria Embankment Gardens SINC. Jubilee Bridge and Waterloo Bridge are nearest application sites.

 Archbishops Park SINC. Lambeth Bridge is nearest application site

 St. George’s Square Gardens SINC. Vauxhall Bridge is nearest application site.

6.5.3 The applicant has undertaken a combination of survey and desk studies. A breeding bird survey, preliminary roost assessment and bat activity survey submitted to support the Environmental Statement (ES).

6.5.4 Birds

6.5.5 Breeding Bird Survey Report (ES Volume 4 Appendix ECO.01) indicates the bird breeding and roosting suitability for each bridge. The results are listed below in relation to the bridges within Lambeth.

Name of Bridge Breeding suitability Roosting suitability

Waterloo Bridge Partial Partial

Hungerford Bridge Good Good

Westminster Bridge Negligible Partial

Lambeth Bridge Negligible Partial

Vauxhall Bridge Partial Partial

6.5.6 Mitigation measures in terms of installation are outlined within the ES to reduce potential impacts. The ES states (Volume 2 Main Text, Chapter 6 Ecology – Para 6.6.1) the installation of the proposed illumination across all 15 bridges will typically be timed to avoid the core breeding season for the majority of bird species. The installation on the Phase 1 bridges is proposed to be undertaken between September and December 2018 (Figure 3.18, Chapter 3). If any of the installation is required before the end of the nesting bird season (March to August inclusive), a nesting bird check will be carried out prior to any works taking place. If any birds are observed nesting, a buffer zone will be created around the nest and work will be delayed in that area of the bridge until the nest is no longer active.

6.5.7 Paragraph 7.1.8 of the Code of Construction Practice (ES Volume 4 Appendix GEN.04) states that the majority of installation works will be undertaken outside the core bird breeding period, however there is some potential for breeding birds to be present during installation. This will be mitigated for either by the installation of bird deterrent devices or by a check for nesting birds prior to the installation at each bridge, with appropriate avoidance measures put in place to avoid impacts on any bird nests present.

6.5.8 Bats 6.5.9 The Bat Roost Assessment (Volume 4 Appendix ECO.02) results for bat roost potential are indicated below in relation to the bridges within Lambeth.

Bridge Name Potential Bat Roost Provisional Bat Roost Features Potential

Vauxhall Bridge Behind pier statues Moderate

Lambeth Bridge Gaps behind pier cladding. Moderate Gaps at arch/pier intersections.

Westminster Bridge Gaps around pier Low

Cladding.

Golden Jubilee/Hungerford Gaps in brick cladding of old Moderate Bridge Piers.

Waterloo Bridge Gaps in brick cladding of old Low

Piers.

6.5.10 Paragraph 7.1.8 of the Code of Construction Practice (ES Volume 4 Appendix GEN.04) states that prior to any installation works carried out during the summer a survey will be carried out to confirm the likely absence of bat roosts from the bridges. A condition to this effect is recommended. In the event a bat roost is discovered, and it is deemed that due to the location of the roost, the roost will be subject to disturbance during the installation or operational phase, a European Protected Species Licence will be applied for to NE to enable the proposed Installation to proceed lawfully, with appropriate mitigation put in place.

6.5.11 Marine Ecology

6.5.12 Algae: Paragraph 6.6.21 of the ES (Volume 2 Chapter 6 Ecology) states that Macroalgae communities associated with intertidal areas on the banks adjacent to the bridges and attached to the bridge piers will not be affected by the installation of the proposed illumination. All scaffolding and abseiling activities will be undertaken above the high-water mark where the macroalgae is not present. Small vessels that will be utilised will be mobile or moored in the river. Some small disturbance to populations growing on the pier is possible from mooring if required but any impact will be localised. Following disturbance, macroalgae populations are likely to rapidly recover. The magnitude of impact during the installation phase has therefore been assessed as low and the effect will be negligible.

6.5.13 Fish: Paragraph 6.6.22 of the ES (Volume 2 Chapter 6 Ecology) states that given the embedded mitigation and the use of a small safety boat during the installation phase of the proposed Illumination, the magnitude of impact on migratory and non-migratory fish species is considered imperceptible and the effect negligible.

6.5.14 Marine Mammals: Paragraph 6.6.22 of the ES (Volume 2 Chapter 6 Ecology) states that given the embedded mitigation and the use of a small safety boat during the installation phase of the proposed Illumination, the magnitude of impact on marine mammal species from potential for collision or disturbance is considered imperceptible and the effect negligible.

6.5.15 Paragraph 6.6.3 of the ES (Volume 2 Chapter 6 Ecology) states detailed installation methodologies for each bridge will not be fully developed until Principal Contractors are appointed post-planning. However, Chapter 3 of the ES provides an overview of the installation methodology expected to be adopted for each bridge. There will be no use of the river banks during the installation period, minimising impacts to terrestrial species. For all bridges it is expected that access for the installation will be gained via abseiling and scaffolding techniques, or from existing bridge walkways. A safety boat is likely to be used as a safety precaution for working at heights over water. The use of these methods minimises disturbance to the estuarine environment by reducing (i) vessel movements that can collide with marine mammals; (ii) underwater noise that can affect underwater communication between marine mammals; and (iii) the potential for fuel spills that can impact on water quality and cause toxicity to the receiving environment. A condition is imposed that a detailed installation methodology as part of the phasing plan for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) is submitted.

6.5.16 Paragraph 6.6.4 of the ES (Volume 2 Chapter 6 Ecology) states a series of measures to minimise environmental effects during installation are set out in the Code of Construction Practice (CoCP) (Appendix GEN.04, Volume 4) which is submitted for approval as part of the planning application. This Code of Construction practice provides a high level framework for mitigation measures which will be adopted during the installation to ensure the environmental effects are controlled and minimised. A more detailed Code of Construction practice will be produced by the Contractor for each bridge installation incorporating the principles of the Framework Code of Construction Practice (para 3.4.20 and 3.4.21 ES Volume 2 Chapter 3). A condition is imposed that a detailed Code of Construction Practice is submitted for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge).

6.5.17 Operational Measures - Ecology

6.5.18 The following measures would be in place to ensure that the operation of the lighting would have a minimal impact on the identified ecological receptors:

 the proposed Illumination has been designed to limit lighting of the foreshore to safeguard habitat conditions for terrestrial and aquatic species;

 individual luminaires would be directed at the bridge structures themselves;

 there would be no direct lighting of the water column beneath each bridge, with the direction of lighting carefully controlled through the use of light shields;

 operational times of the lighting installation would be kept to existing bridge ‘lightup’ hours

6.5.19 The Environment Agency were consulted on the applications and raised no objection subject to a condition for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) that a detailed lighting management strategy is submitted to ensure the protection of wildlife and supporting habitat and informative regarding marine licencing. ARUP have also recommended that a detailed lighting management strategy is submitted for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge) that addresses the treatment of any environmentally sensitive features, the aftercare and maintenance of lighting infrastructure and plan detailing the proposed lighting levels.

6.6 Flood Risk

6.6.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.6.2 The Environment Agency were consulted on the applications and raised no objection subject to an informative, highlighting to the applicant that the River Thames is a main river and is under the jurisdiction of the Environment Agency, that a flood risk activity permit may be required. An informative to this affect is to be included on the decision notices for each bridge (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge).

6.7 Crime and security

6.7.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.7.2 Policy Q3 requires development to be designed in a manner that does not engender opportunities for crime or anti-social behaviour or create a hostile environment that would produce fear of crime. Therefore development should not be permitted where opportunities for crime are created or where it results in an increased risk of public disorder. 6.7.3 The council’s Secure by Design officer has reviewed the applications and has no comments to make regarding the applications other than to ask that the lighting is sympathetic to CCTV in the area, which can be supported by achieving BS5489 lighting standards (apply to all bridges Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge). An informative to this affect is recommended to apply to all bridges (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge).

6.8 Sustainable Design and Construction

6.8.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.8.2 Local Plan Policy EN4 requires; all development, including construction of the public realm, highways and other physical infrastructure, will be required to meet high standards of sustainable design and construction feasible, relating to the scale, nature and form of the proposal.

6.8.3 Energy

6.8.4 The applicant notes that the project will be more energy efficient than the existing decorative lighting as LED lights will be used. Existing inefficient lighting from other art installations will be removed and, overall, it is expected that energy consumption associated with artistic lighting will decrease. We consider the use of LED as appropriate due to the high energy efficiency of these bulbs. Power will be supplied from a local electrical grid and the applicant is strongly encouraged to choose a renewable energy contract to demonstrate commitment to sustainability of the installations and minimise emissions. There are a variety of these kinds of contracts, and not all are truly renewable – the applicant should choose contracts which genuinely add additional renewable capacity to the grid. An informative to this effect is recommended.

6.8.5 The Environmental Statement outlines that, during construction, energy use will be minimised as far as practicable. This will be done through the use of motion sensor lighting and low energy consumption fittings. This is considered acceptable.

6.8.6 Waste

6.8.7 The Environmental Statement outlines that minimal waste will be generated from this project. The Code of Construction Practice outlines that the waste hierarchy will be implemented to ensure maximum efficiency of resource use. A materials and resource management plan will be prepared which will include the plans for waste minimisation, segregation and control. All waste facilities onsite will be clearly labelled as per the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) colour coding. This will facilitate re-use, recycling and recovery of waste.

6.8.8 The LEDs to be used will have an extended lifespan of approximately 20 years, in excess of the majority of the existing bridge lighting. This will therefore reduce waste levels during operation as well as ongoing maintenance.

6.8.9 The information provided by the applicant is sufficient and complies with policy, including sustainable design and construction.

6.9 Environmental Statement 6.9.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.9.2 The applications are for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) development and are accompanied by an Environmental Statement (ES).

6.9.3 The submitted ES, non-technical summary (NTS) and appendices have been reviewed by ARUP against the following documents as agreed with LBL:

• The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (‘EIA Regulations’);

• LBL’s EIA Scoping Opinion (planning reference 17/05935/EIASCP) 2, as required by the EIA Regulations; and

• The European Commission’s ‘Guidance on EIA: EIS Review’ and the associated checklist, which includes a review of environmental topics namely Ecology (discussed above at section 6.5 (paragraphs 6.5.1- 6.5.19)) and Townscape, Heritage and Visual Impact (‘THVIA’) (discussed above at section 6.2 (paragraphs 6.2.1 - 6.2.47).

6.9.4 Arup have reviewed the ES against the requirements of the EIA Regulations, which includes compliance with LBL’s Scoping Opinion. Where a lack of compliance with the EIA Regulations has been identified, these have been captured in section 4 of ARUP’s final report which reviews the ES according to the EIS Checklist.

6.9.5 This review has been undertaken in two stages by ARUP: preliminary and final. The preliminary review required clarifications from the Applicant regarding the information contained within the ES. The preliminary review concluded that there were a small number of issues relating to the ES that may have posed planning risks for LBL during the determination period. These risks were around further explanation of some specific information/data within the ES and in some cases the approach taken to the assessment.

6.9.6 Given the information provided in the ES and subsequent clarifications from the Applicant (in Appendix B2 of ARUP’s final report), the environmental information submitted in support of the proposed development is considered sufficient for LBL to determine the application.

6.9.7 The legislative requirements of Schedule 4 of the EIA Regulations have been met, and the Scoping Opinion generally complied with, with the exception of the request to consider intended periods of darkness to benefit bats. It is recommended that this is pursued via planning condition if permission is granted

6.9.8 While the ES may have benefitted from having additional detail where review questions were rated lower than ‘robust’ in the preliminary review, there is sufficient information to reliably inform decision making on the planning applications. Further information is therefore not required.

6.10 Planning Obligations and CIL

6.10.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.10.2 There are no planning obligations or CIL payment arising from this development.

6.11 Other planning issues 6.11.1 Future Maintenance

6.11.2 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

6.11.3 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge, Application 2: Lambeth Bridge and Application 3: Westminster Bridge are owned and maintained by TfL. Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge is owned by Westminster City Council and Lambeth Council. Although, Lambeth own part of this bridge Westminster maintain this bridge and Lambeth contribute part of the total maintenance cost. Application 5 Waterloo Bridge is owned by Westminster Council.

6.11.4 Details for the long-term maintenance arrangements for the proposal are to be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority/TFL where applicable. This is to be secured by condition to apply to all bridges (Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge).

6.11.5 If the final lighting scheme would be disused for more than 12 months or permanently cease a decommissioning plan shall be submitted to the LPA for approval and the decommissioning carried out in-accordance with the approved details.

7 CONCLUSION

7.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge; Application 2: Lambeth Bridge; Application 3 Westminster Bridge; Application 4: Golden Jubilee Footbridge; Application 5: Waterloo Bridge.

7.2 The proposal is considered to be a high quality piece of art in an appropriate location. The lighting scheme seeks to enhance an appreciation of the character and significance of each bridge and deliver public art in recognition of the bridges as landmarks, but which is also sensitive, acknowledging the place of them in the context of wider element of cultural landmarks on the Thames in views which have been identified as important to London's character strategically. It is considered that the proposal would accord with policies Q4, Q24 and ED11 of the Local Plan.

7.3 In relation to the historic environment, it is considered that the proposed lighting schemes have been designed to ensure visual sensitivity, discreetly integrating lighting into an overall design. It is considered, that the lighting has been designed so as to preserve the special architectural and historic interest and significance of the listed bridges and not harm the setting of designated, non-designated heritage assets in accordance with section 16 and 66 of the Town Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, policies in the NPPF, London Plan Policy 7.8, Lambeth Local Plan Policies, Q19, Q20, Q21 and Q22.

7.4 In relation to amenity, subject to conditions, the proposal would not have a significant detrimental impact on amenity and accords with Local Plan policy Q2.

7.5 Any effects associated with the installation of the proposed illumination will be phased and short-term, as the installation on each bridge is not anticipated to exceed 12 weeks plus four weeks commissioning. Subject to conditions the proposal would have minimal potential traffic and transport effects during installation. In terms of river traffic it is considered that subject to conditions the impacts on the river and river users would be acceptable and accord with Policy T6 and T5. 7.6 In relation to ecology and biodiversity, subject to conditions, the proposal would have a negligible impact on ecology and biodiversity and accords with Local Plan policy EN1.

7.7 In relation to sustainability and waste, it is considered that careful consideration has been given to the design of the scheme such that it would comply with Local Plan policy EN4.

7.8 With regards to the Environmental Statement there is sufficient information to reliably inform decision making on the planning applications.

7.9 Officers have assessed the proposals in relation to national, strategic and local policies contained within the NPPF, London Plan and the Lambeth Local Plan and the application is recommended for approval, subject to conditions.

8 RECOMMENDATION

8.1 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge 18/01995/EIAFUL

8.2 Resolve to approve the Planning Application, subject to conditions.

8.3 Agree to delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Development to: Finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report

8.4 Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge 18/01996/LB

8.5 Resolve to grant Listed Building Consent, subject to conditions.

8.6 Agree to delegate authority to the Director of Planning and Development to: Finalise the recommended conditions as set out in this report

Conditions(s) and Reasons(s)

Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge 18/01995/EIAFUL 1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun no later than three years from the date of this decision notice.

Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans, drawings and other documents listed in this decision notice, other than where those details are altered pursuant to the conditions of this planning permission.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

3. The development to which this permission relates must not be carried out unless it is part of a scheme to illuminate the bridge in its entirety (within both Lambeth and City of Westminster).

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

4. The illuminated displays hereby approved must not include corporate sponsorship or any form of advertising.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

Phasing Plan/Programme for Implementation 5. Prior to the commencement of each phase, a Phasing Plan which includes a programme for implementation, an installation management plan setting out how the specific installation impacts would be managed on the road network and river operations during installation and maintenance works and impact to structure of the bridge shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with Transport for London (TfL) and Port of London Authority (PLA). The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To minimise danger, obstruction and inconvenience to users of the highway and on the river (policies T6 and T5 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Detailed - Code of Construction Practice 6. The development hereby approved shall not commence until a detailed Code of Practice Plan has been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority in consultation with TfL and the PLA. The Code of Construction Plan shall follow the Code of Construction Practice (Environmental Statement Volume 4, Appendix GEN.04) and shall observe the requirements of the statutory guidance and other relevant guidance and shall include details of the following measures:

i. An introduction consisting of construction phase environmental management plan, definitions and abbreviations and project description and location; ii. A description of management responsibilities; iii. A description of the construction programme which identifies activities likely to cause high levels of noise or dust; iv. Site working hours and a named person for residents to contact; v. Advance notification of road closures vi. Details of measures to prevent the deposit of mud and debris on the public highway vii. Detailed Site logistics arrangements; viii. Details regarding parking, deliveries, and storage; viii. Details regarding dust and noise mitigation measures to be deployed including identification of sensitive receptors and ongoing monitoring; xi. Details of the hours of works and other measures to mitigate the impact of construction on the amenity of the area and safety of the highway network; and xi. Communication procedures with the London Borough Lambeth, Transport for London and Port of London Authority and local community where applicable regarding key construction issues.

The construction/installation shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the details and measures approved in the Code of Construction Plan for the related phase, unless the written consent of the Local Planning Authority is received for any variation.

Reason: Development must not commence before this condition is discharged to avoid hazard and obstruction being caused to users of the public highway and to safeguard residential amenity from the start of the construction process (policies 7.14 of the London Plan (2016); and policies T6 and T8 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Non road-mobile machinery (NRMM) 7. No non-road mobile machinery (NRMM) shall be used on the site unless it is compliant with the NRMM Low Emission Zone requirements (or any superseding requirements) and until it has been registered for use on the site on the NRMM register (or any superseding register).

Reason: To ensure that air quality is not adversely affected by the development in line with London Plan policy 7.14 and the Mayor’s SPG: The Control of Dust and Emissions During Construction and Demolition.

Design and Conservation 8. Notwithstanding details hereby approved, prior to installation of any light fittings details of the painting schedule for the painting of any prominent graze, node and floodlight fittings shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The colour should be in keeping with the colour of the existing bridge structure. The painting schedule shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

9. Notwithstanding details hereby approved, prior to installation of any light fittings, detailed drawings illustrating the existing light fittings to be retained and those to be removed shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The light fittings shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

10. All new external work and finishes and work of making good shall match the existing adjacent original work in respect of the, materials, colour, texture, profile, and finished appearance, except where indicated otherwise on the drawings hereby approved, or unless otherwise required by condition.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

11. Notwithstanding details hereby approved, prior to the commencement of the development, final details of electrical cabling and equipment associated with the lighting scheme (including feeder pillars), including their location, size, fixing and colour shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. A sample of the housing to be erected on site for viewing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

Lighting 12. Prior to bringing into first use (operation) the lighting installation hereby permitted, a smaller trial installation supported by a design specification (including light scheme and spill light survey) shall be agreed, witnessed and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with the Port of London Authority, to confirm that there are no impacts associated with navigational light, glare and light spillage. The full development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved design specification.

Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the findings of the Environmental Statement. To ensure minimal nuisance or disturbance is caused to the detriment of the amenities of adjoining occupiers, of the area generally and navigational safety (Policies Q2, and T5 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2015.)

13. Following the trial test but prior to bringing into first use (operation) the lighting installation hereby permitted, the following detail shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority:

(i) The final impact of the illumination on the navigational lights together with Port of London Authority assessment of the impact on navigational safety. (ii) Any additional measures that would be required to mitigate the potential for glare and light spillage.

The lighting scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the findings of the Environmental Statement. To ensure minimal nuisance or disturbance is caused to the detriment of the amenities of adjoining occupiers, of the area generally and navigational safety (Policies Q2 and T5 of the Lambeth Local Plan 2015.)

14. Notwithstanding the details hereby approved, prior to bringing into first use (operation) the lighting installation hereby permitted, details of the final intensity, colour and transience shall be agreed and witnessed by the Local Planning Authority through a site inspection, and shall be implemented and maintained in accordance with the approved details. The site inspection will take place within two months following completion of the installation of light fittings.

Reason: To ensure that the development is in accordance with the findings of the Environmental Statement. To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

15. Prior to bringing into first use (operation) the lighting installation hereby permitted, a detailed lighting management strategy shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This shall deal with the treatment of any environmentally sensitive areas, their aftercare and maintenance, as well as a plan detailing the proposed works and lighting levels.

Such a strategy shall include details of the following:

 the location and direction of artificial lights on the bridge / adjacent to the River Thames;  how the ambient light levels will be lowered throughout the post-midnight hours, such as 00.00-05.00hrs.

The works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved strategy.

Reason: to safeguard and prevent irrevocable damage to habitat and wildlife (policies 7.19 of the London Plan (2015) and EN1 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Noise 16. Noise from any mechanical equipment or building services plant, as measured in accordance with BS4142: 2014, shall not exceed the background noise level L90B(A) 15 minutes, when measured outside the window of the nearest noise sensitive or residential premises.

Reason: To protect the amenities of adjoining occupiers and the surrounding area (policy Q2 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Hours of Operation 17. The use of the lighting scheme herby permitted shall not be illuminated (operate) other than within the period from dusk to dawn on any day.

Reason: To ensure that no nuisance or disturbance is caused to the detriment of the amenities of adjoining occupiers or users of the area generally. To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) (policies Q2 and Q20 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Wildlife/Habitat 18. Prior to commencement of any works on site, a suitable protocol for the protection of legally protected species present on site, or identified during construction, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. This must include:

i) If the installation at any bridge is to commence during the breeding bird season (March to August inclusive) a check for nesting birds to determine whether any breeding birds, nests, nestlings or eggs will be impacted by the installation activities. Where any breeding birds, nests, nestlings or eggs are identified, they will be protected; and

ii) Repeat of the baseline breeding bird survey described in Chapter 6 of the Environmental Statement no later than 2 June 2019 and every two years thereafter until completion of the Proposed Illumination to ensure that baseline conditions have not changed significantly, and if necessary re-assess the requirements for mitigation prior to commencement of installation.

Reason: to safeguard and prevent irrevocable damage to habitat and wildlife (policies 7.19 of the London Plan (2015) and EN1 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)).

Long Term Management and Maintenance 19. Details for the long-term maintenance arrangements for the proposal to be submitted and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority in consultation with TfL prior to bringing into first use (operation) the lighting installation hereby permitted. The submitted details should specify the responsibilities of each party for the lifetime of the development and any other arrangement to secure the operation of the scheme throughout its lifetime. The management and maintenance arrangements shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details over the period specified.

Reason: to ensure that the appearance of the bridge is suitably maintained. To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

20. Should the project be decommissioned, the lighting scheme be disused for 12 months or more or permanently cease a Decommissioning Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The decommissioning shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: to ensure that the appearance of the bridge is suitably maintained and safeguard public safety. To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22, Q23 and T6 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

Informatives(s) 1. This decision letter does not convey an approval or consent which may be required under any enactment, by-law, order or regulation, other than Section 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. Your attention is drawn to the provisions of the Building Regulations, and related legislation which must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Council's Building Control Officer. 3. Your attention is drawn to the need to comply with the requirements of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 concerning construction site noise and in this respect you are advised to contact the Council's Environmental Health Division.

4. In relation to NRMM, for information on the NRMM Low Emission Zone requirements and to register NRMM, please visit http://nrmm.london/

5. Asset Owner permission should be sought from TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority before physical works can be undertaken on site.

6. You are advised of the necessity to consult TfL should the applicant wish to install scaffolding or a hoarding on the footway whilst undertaking this work, separate licences may be required with TfL, please see, https://www.tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/highway-licences

7. It will also need to be established whether there is a need to provide mitigation or to re-arrange any of the Port of London Authoritiy’s (PLA) existing systems. This will need to be progressed with the PLA as each phase of the project in relation to Lambeth Council is progressed and will be addressed through the PLA’s RWL regime.

8. Please be aware that the River Thames is a designated ‘main river’ and, as such, is under the jurisdiction of the Environment Agency for its land drainage functions. Since April 2016, the Water Resources Act 1991 and associated land drainage byelaws have been amended, and flood defence consents now fall under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2010. A flood risk activity permit (FRAP) may be equired for any activities:

 in, over, under or within sixteen metres of a tidal main river;  over, under or within sixteen metres of the landward extent of the flood defences on a tidal main river.

Please visit the ‘flood risk activities: environmental permits’ section of the gov.uk website for further information. Please contact our National Customer Contact Centre on 03708 506 506 or email [email protected], or the local Partnerships & Strategic Overview team on [email protected] for further details.

9. Marine licences from the Marine Management Organisation (MMO) cover inshore areas, and include any area which is submerged at mean high water spring tide up to the territorial limit. They also include the waters of every estuary, river or channel where the tide flows at mean high water spring tide. Please visit the ‘marine licence’ section of the gov.uk website for further information.

10. You are advised in terms of secure by design to ensure that the lighting is sympathetic to CCTV in the area, which can be supported by achieving BS5489 lighting standards.

11. Power will be supplied from a local electrical grid and the applicant is strongly encouraged to choose a renewable energy contract to demonstrate commitment to sustainability of the installations and minimise emissions. There are a variety of these kinds of contracts, and not all are truly renewable – the applicant should choose contracts which genuinely add additional renewable capacity to the grid.

Conditions(s) and Reasons(s) Application 1: Vauxhall Bridge 18/01996/LB 1. The development to which this permission relates must be begun no later than three years from the date of this decision notice.

Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990

2. The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in complete accordance with the approved plans, drawings and other documents listed in this decision notice, other than where those details are altered pursuant to the conditions of this planning permission.

Reason: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.

3. Notwithstanding the details hereby approved, prior to the commencement of development, details of fixing methods used in the installation of the hereby approved lighting scheme, shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority, and undertaken in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area. (Policies Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22, and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015).

4. Notwithstanding details hereby approved, prior to the commencement of the development, final details of electrical cabling and equipment associated with the lighting scheme (including feeder pillars), including their location, size, fixing and colour shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. A sample of the housing to be erected on site for viewing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area (Policies Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

5. All new external work and finishes and work of making good shall match the existing adjacent original work in respect of the, materials, colour, texture, profile, and finished appearance, except where indicated otherwise on the drawings hereby approved, or unless otherwise required by condition.

Reason: To protect the special architectural or historic interest of the listed building (Bridge) and that it protects or enhances the character of the surrounding conservation area and area generally. (Policies Q2, Q4, Q18, Q19, Q20, Q21, Q22 and Q23 of the Lambeth Local Plan (2015)

Informatives(s) 1. This decision letter does not convey an approval or consent which may be required under any enactment, by-law, order or regulation, other than Section 57 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

2. Your attention is drawn to the provisions of the Building Regulations, and related legislation which must be complied with to the satisfaction of the Council's Building Control Officer.

3. Your attention is drawn to the need to comply with the requirements of the Control of Pollution Act 1974 concerning construction site noise and in this respect you are advised to contact the Council's Environmental Health Division.

4. Asset Owner permission should be sought from TfL’s Technical Approvals Authority before physical works can be undertaken on site.

5. You are advised of the necessity to consult TfL should the applicant wish to install scaffolding or a hoarding on the footway whilst undertaking this work, separate licences may be required with TfL, please see, https://www.tfl.gov.uk/info-for/urban-planning-and-construction/highway-licences.