DOCSLIB.ORG

Romania and the Warsaw Pact: 1955-1989

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Romania and the Warsaw Pact: 1955-1989 COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT Working Paper #43 Romania and the Warsaw Pact: 1955-1989 By: Dennis Deletant and Mihail Ionescu Translations by Viorel Buda, Cornel Ban, and Mircea Munteanu April 2004 COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN 11 Cold War International History Project he Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) was established at the Woodrow Wilson TInternational Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C., in 1991 with the help of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and receives major support from the MacArthur Foundation athe Korea Foundation, the Henry Luce Foundation and the Andrew Mellon Foundation. The Project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to disseminate new information and perspectives on Cold War history emerging Lee H. Hamilton, in particular from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side”—the former Communist bloc— Director and President through publications, fellowships, and scholarly meetings and conferences. The Director of the Cold War International History Project is Christian F. Ostermann. Within the Wilson Center, CWIHP is under the Division of International Studies, headed by Dr. Robert S. Litwak. CWIHP is overseen BOARD OF T RUSTEES by an advisory committee chaired by Prof. William Taubman (Amherst College) and consisting of Joseph B. Gildenhorn, Chairman Michael Beschloss; Dr. James Billington (Librarian of Congress); Prof. Warren I. Cohen (University David A. Metzner, Vice Chairman of Maryland-Baltimore); Prof. John Lewis Gaddis (Yale University); Prof. James G. Hershberg (George Washington University); Dr. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. ( Woodrow Wilson Center); and Prof. Sharon Wolchik (George Washington University). Readers are invited to submit articles, documents, PUBLIC M EMBERS: letters, and other items to the Bulletin. Publication of articles does not constitute CWIHP’s The Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, The endorsement of authors’ views. Copies are available free upon request, or can be downloaded at Librarian of Congress James H. Billington, The cwihp.si.edu. Archivist of the United States John W. Carlin, The Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities William R. Ferris, The Submissions blurb here Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution Lawrence M. Small, The Secretary of Cold War International History Project Bulletin Education Roderick R. Paige, The Secretary Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars of Health & Human Services Tommy G. One Woodrow Wilson Plaza Thompson. 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20523 PRIVATE C ITIZEN M EMBERS: Tel.: (202) 691-4110 Joseph A. Cari, Jr., Carol Cartwright, Fax: (202) 691-4184 Donald E. Garcia, Bruce S. Gelb, Daniel L. Lamaute, Tamala L. Longaberger, Thomas R. Reedy THE W ILSON C OUNCIL PRESDENT, Bruce S. Gelb Diane Aboulafia-D’Jaen, Elias F. Aburdene, Charles S. Ackerman, B.B. Andersen, Russell Anmuth, Cyrus A. Ansary, Lawrence E. Bathgate II, Theresa Behrendt, John Beinecke, Joseph C. Bell, Steven Alan Bennett, Rudy Boschwitz, A. Oakley Brooks, Donald A. Brown, Melva Bucksbaum, Conrad Cafritz, Nicola L. Caiola, Scott Carter, Albert V. Casey, Mark Chandler, Peter B. Clark, Melvin Cohen, William T. Coleman, Jr., David M. Crawford, Jr., Michael D. DiGiacomo, Beth Dozoretz, Sheldon Drobny, F. Samuel Eberts III, I. Steven Edelson, J. David Eller, Mark Epstein, Melvyn J. Estrin, Sim Farar, Susan R. Farber, Roger Felberbaum, Joseph H. Flom, John H. Foster, Charles Fox, Barbara Hackman Franklin, Norman Freidkin, John H. French, II, Morton Funger, Gregory M. Gallo, Chris G. Gardiner, Gordon D. Giffin, Steven J. Gilbert, Alma Gildenhorn, David F. Girard-diCarlo, Michael B. Goldberg, Roy M. Goodman, Gretchen Meister Gorog, William E. Grayson, Ronald Greenberg, Raymond A. Guenter, Cheryl F. Halpern, Edward L. Hardin, Jr., Jean L. Hennessey, Eric Hotung, John L. Howard, Darrell E. Issa, Jerry Jasinowski, Brenda LaGrange Johnson, Shelly Kamins, James M. Kaufman, Edward W. Kelley, Jr., Anastasia D. Kelly, Christopher J. Kennan, Willem Kooyker, Steven Kotler, Paul Kranhold, William H. Kremer, Raymond Learsy, Abbe Lane Leff, Perry Leff, Dennis A. LeVett, Francine Gordon Levinson, Harold O. Levy, David Link, Frederic V. Malek, David S. Mandel, John P. Manning, Jeffrey A. Marcus, John Mason, Jay Mazur, Robert McCarthy, Linda McCausland, Stephen G. McConahey, Donald F. McLellan, Charles McVean, J. Kenneth Menges, Jr., Philip Merrill, Kathryn Mosbacher, Jeremiah L. Murphy, Martha T. Muse, Della M. Newman, John E. Osborn, Paul Hae Park, Gerald L. Parsky, Michael J. Polenske, Donald Robert Quartel, Jr., J. John L. Richardson, Margaret Milner Richardson, Larry D. Richman, Carlyn Ring, Edwin Robbins, Robert G. Rogers, Otto Ruesch, Juan A. Sabater, B. Francis Saul, III, Alan M. Schwartz, Timothy R. Scully, J. Michael Shepherd, George P. Shultz, Raja W. Sidawi, Kenneth Siegel, Ron Silver, William A. Slaughter, James H. Small, Shawn Smeallie, Gordon V. Smith, Thomas F. Stephenson, Norman Kline Tiefel, Mark C. Treanor, Anthony G. Viscogliosi, Christine M. Warnke, Ruth Westheimer, Pete Wilson, Deborah Wince-Smith, Herbert S. Winokur, Jr., Paul Martin Wolff, Joseph Zappala, Richard S. Ziman, Nancy M. Zirkin THE COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN, Series Editor This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C. Established in 1991 by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, the Cold War International History Project (CWIHP) disseminates new information and perspectives on the history of the Cold War as it emerges from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side” of the post-World War II superpower rivalry. The project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to accelerate the process of integrating new sources, materials and perspectives from the former “Communist bloc” with the historiography of the Cold War which has been written over the past few decades largely by Western scholars reliant on Western archival sources. It also seeks to transcend barriers of language, geography, and regional specialization to create new links among scholars interested in Cold War history. Among the activities undertaken by the project to promote this aim are a periodic BULLETIN to disseminate new findings, views, and activities pertaining to Cold War history; a fellowship program for young historians from the former Communist bloc to conduct archival research and study Cold War history in the United States; international scholarly meetings, conferences, and seminars; and publications. The CWIHP Working Paper Series is designed to provide a speedy publications outlet for historians associated with the project who have gained access to newly-available archives and sources and would like to share their results. We especially welcome submissions by junior scholars from the former Communist bloc who have done research in their countries’ archives and are looking to introduce their findings to a Western audience. As a non-partisan institute of scholarly study, the Woodrow Wilson Center takes no position on the historical interpretations and opinions offered by the authors. Those interested in receiving copies of the Cold War International History Project Bulletin or any of the Working Papers should contact: Cold War International History Project Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20523 Telephone: (202) 691-4110 Fax: (202) 691-4001 Email: [email protected] CWIHP Web Page: http://cwihp.si.edu i COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPERS SERIES Christian F. Ostermann, Series Editor #1 Chen Jian, “The Sino-Soviet Alliance and China’s Entry into the Korean War” #2 P.J. Simmons, “Archival Research on the Cold War Era: A Report from Budapest, Prague and Warsaw” #3 James Richter, “Reexamining Soviet Policy Towards Germany during the Beria Interregnum” #4 Vladislav M. Zubok, “Soviet Intelligence and the Cold War: The ‘Small’ Committee of Information, 1952- 53” #5 Hope M. Harrison, “Ulbricht and the Concrete ‘Rose’: New Archival Evidence on the Dynamics of Soviet- East German Relations and the Berlin Crisis, 1958-61” #6 Vladislav M. Zubok, “Khrushchev and the Berlin Crisis (1958-62)” #7 Mark Bradley and Robert K. Brigham, “Vietnamese Archives and Scholarship on the Cold War Period: Two Reports” #8 Kathryn Weathersby, “Soviet Aims in Korea and the Origins of the Korean War, 1945-50: New Evidence From Russian Archives” #9 Scott D. Parrish and Mikhail M. Narinsky, “New Evidence on the Soviet Rejection of the Marshall Plan, 1947: Two Reports” #10 Norman M. Naimark, “‘To Know Everything and To Report Everything Worth Knowing’: Building the East German Police State, 1945-49” #11 Christian F. Ostermann, “The United States, the East German Uprising of 1953, and the Limits of Rollback” #12 Brian Murray, “Stalin, the Cold War, and the Division of China: A Multi-Archival Mystery” #13 Vladimir O. Pechatnov, “The Big Three After World War II: New Documents on Soviet Thinking about Post-War Relations with the United States and Great Britain” #14 Ruud van Dijk, “The 1952 Stalin Note Debate: Myth or Missed Opportunity for German Unification?” #15 Natalia I. Yegorova, “The ‘Iran Crisis’ of 1945-46:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scientific Exorcisms? the Memory of the Communist Security Apparatus
    285 Stefano Bottoni PhD University of Florence, Italy ORCID: 0000-0002-2533-2250 SCIENTIFIC EXORCISMS? ARTICLES THE MEMORY OF THE COMMUNIST SECURITY APPARATUS AND ITS STUDY IN ROMANIA AFTER 1989 Abstract This article discusses the institutional attempts to deal with the archival legacy of the Romanian communist security police, Securitate (1945–1989), during the democratic transition in post-communist Romania. The first part draws a short outline of Securitate’s history and activities as one of the main power instruments of the communist dictatorship. The second part of the article shows the development of political attitudes towards institutional attempts to deal with the communist past in the post-communist Romania. This paper describes the reluctant attitude of the ruling circles in the 1990s towards the opening of the Securitate archives and the lustration attempts. The formation of the National Council for the Study of Securitate Archives (Consiliul Național pentru Studierea Arhivelor Securității, CNSAS, legally established 1999) hardly changed the general situation: the archives of the Securitate were transferred to CNSAS with significant delays, and the 2008 ruling of the constitutional court limited its lustration competences. The establishment of the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (Institutul de Investigare a Crimelor Comunismului şi Memoria Exilului Românesc, IICCMER, established 2005) and formation in 2006 of the Presidential Commission for the Analysis of the Communist Dictatorship Institute of National Remembrance 2/2020 286 in Romania led by renowned political scientist Vladimir Tismăneanu together with the research and legal activities of CNSAS contributed to a broader evaluation of the communist regime (although its impact seems to be limited).
    [Show full text]
  • Communism and Post-Communism in Romania : Challenges to Democratic Transition
    TITLE : COMMUNISM AND POST-COMMUNISM IN ROMANIA : CHALLENGES TO DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION AUTHOR : VLADIMIR TISMANEANU, University of Marylan d THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FO R EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 LEGAL NOTICE The Government of the District of Columbia has certified an amendment of th e Articles of Incorporation of the National Council for Soviet and East European Research changing the name of the Corporation to THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EURASIAN AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH, effective on June 9, 1997. Grants, contracts and all other legal engagements of and with the Corporation made unde r its former name are unaffected and remain in force unless/until modified in writin g by the parties thereto . PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : University of Marylan d PR1NCIPAL 1NVEST1GATOR : Vladimir Tismanean u COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 81 1-2 3 DATE : March 26, 1998 COPYRIGHT INFORMATIO N Individual researchers retain the copyright on their work products derived from research funded by contract with the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research . However, the Council and the United States Government have the right to duplicate an d disseminate, in written and electronic form, this Report submitted to the Council under thi s Contract, as follows : Such dissemination may be made by the Council solely (a) for its ow n internal use, and (b) to the United States Government (1) for its own internal use ; (2) for further dissemination to domestic, international and foreign governments, entities an d individuals to serve official United States Government purposes ; and (3) for dissemination i n accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the United State s Government granting the public rights of access to documents held by the United State s Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Redivivus
    alexander clapp ROMANIA REDIVIVUS nce the badlands of neoliberal Europe, Romania has become its bustling frontier. A post-communist mafia state that was cast to the bottom of the European heap by opinion- makers sixteen years ago is now billed as the success story Oof eu expansion.1 Its growth rate at nearly 6 per cent is the highest on the continent, albeit boosted by fiscal largesse.2 In Bucharest more politicians have been put in jail for corruption over the past decade than have been convicted in the rest of Eastern Europe put together. Romania causes Brussels and Berlin almost none of the headaches inflicted by the Visegrád Group—Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia— which in 1993 declined to accept Romania as a peer and collectively entered the European Union three years before it. Romanians con- sistently rank among the most Europhile people in the Union.3 An anti-eu party has never appeared on a Romanian ballot, much less in the parliament. Scattered political appeals to unsavoury interwar traditions—Legionnairism, Greater Romanianism—attract fewer voters than do far-right movements across most of Western Europe. The two million Magyars of Transylvania, one of Europe’s largest minorities, have become a model for inter-ethnic relations after a time when the park benches of Cluj were gilded in the Romanian tricolore to remind every- one where they were. Indeed, perhaps the aptest symbol of Romania’s place in Europe today is the man who sits in the Presidential Palace of Cotroceni in Bucharest. Klaus Iohannis—a former physics teacher at a high school in Sibiu, once Hermannstadt—is an ethnic German head- ing a state that, a generation ago, was shipping hundreds of thousands of its ‘Saxons’ ‘back’ to Bonn at 4,000–10,000 Deutschmarks a head.
    [Show full text]
  • A Postnational Double-Displacement: the Blurring of Anti-Roma Violence from Romania to Northern Ireland
    McElroy 1 A Postnational Double-Displacement: The Blurring of Anti-Roma Violence from Romania to Northern Ireland Erin McElroy I. From Romania to Belfast and Back: A Double-Displacement of Roma in a Postnational Europe I don't mind the Poles and the Slovakians who come here. They work hard, harder than indigenous people from here, but all you see now are these Romanians begging and mooching about. We'd all be better off - them and us - if they went back to Romania or somewhere else in Europe Loyalist from South Belfast, quoted in MacDonald, 2009 And so one has to wonder: are the Gypsies really nomadic by “nature,” or have they become so because they have never been allowed to stay? Isabel Fonseca, Bury Me Standing: The Gypsies and Their Journey, 1995 On June 11, 2009, a gang of Loyalist1 youth smashed the windows and damaged the cars of members of South Belfast’s Romanian Roma2 community in an area known as the Holylands. The Holylands borders a space called the Village, a Loyalist stronghold infamous during the height of the Troubles3 for sectarian and paramilitary violence. .4 Like other members of the 1 Although not all Catholics in Northern Ireland are Republicans, and although not all Protestants in the North are Loyalists, largely, Republicans come from Catholic legacies and all Loyalists from Protestant ones. The discursive difference between each group's sovereignty is stark, painting a topography of incommensurability. Many Republicans still labor for a North freed from British governance, while Loyalists elicit that they too have existed in the North for centuries now.
    [Show full text]
  • Romanian Exiles During the Most-Favored-Nation Period, 1974-1988 ______
    COLD WARRIORS IN THE AGE OF DÉTENTE AND DIFFERENTIATION: ROMANIAN EXILES DURING THE MOST-FAVORED-NATION PERIOD, 1974-1988 ____________________________________ A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State University, Fullerton ____________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in History ____________________________________ By Maryam Morsali Sullivan Thesis Committee Approval: Robert McLain, Department of History, Chair Cora Granata, Department of History Bogdan Suceava, Department of Mathematics Spring Semester, 2017 ABSTRACT Throughout modern history, groups of people have emigrated without the ability to return home because of the regime in power. While living in exile, they form or join new communities. They also work to determine their role and relation to their host and home countries. This study focuses on the activities and culture of Romanian exiles in the West from 1974 to 1988. These were the years that the United States granted Most- Favored-Nation status to Nicolae Ceaușescu’s Romania. During this time, American foreign policy ranged from détente to differentiation. The culture of Romanian exiles during the Cold War developed into working to combat communism and lessen Romanian suffering, as well as serving as the voice of and preserving democratic Romania. Exiles never gave up hope that communism could be overthrown. When it became evident that their political activities could not achieve regime change, a group of Romanian exiles decided to diversify their goals. This included focusing on humanitarian aid and preserving Romanian democratic traditions. They allied with the neoconservative wing of the U.S. Congress that originated in the Democratic Party to focus more on humanitarian victories, raise awareness in the West of what they considered to be the truth about Romania, and find means to provide a threat to or weaken Ceaușescu.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania National Report
    Wide the SEE by Succ Mod Romania National Report Harghita Energy Management Public Service & UEM-CARDT The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Romania National Report UEM-CARDT pag 1 Table of content A) INTRODUCTION 1. General overview of the country: 1.1. Meteorology: temperatures, global daily radiation 1.2. Anaglyph / Relief (use of territory) 1.3. Population: evolution for the last 1 year, actual situation and forecast 1.4. Macroeconomic statistics (GDP, per capita GDP, Per main sector GDP percentage, Sectors of activity, Employment – Unemployment, Indicators) 1.5. Statistical data for energy consumption, dependency on energy imports, price evolution, forecast for energy consumption, CO2 emissions (Kyoto Protocol commitments), etc B) STATE OF THE MARKET 2. Overview of the national market situation 2.1. Solar collector production and sales 2.2. Estimated solar parks in present year 2.3. Estimated annual solar thermal energy production in present year, equivalent CO2 emissions avoided in current year (on the basis of oil) 2.4. Product types and solar thermal applications 2.5. Market share of major manufacturers (per product type and application) 2.6. Sector employment 2.7. Imports - Exports C) STATE OF PRODUCTION 3. Main characteristics of production firms (size, concentration, mentality, financial capacity etc.) 4. Product technology and production methods 4.1. Product technology description of typical solar domestic hot water systems 5. Breakdown of solar systems’ cost 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Balance
    CENTRE INTERNATIONAL DE FORMATION EUROPEENNE INSTITUT EUROPEEN DES HAUTES ETUDES INTERNATIONALES Academic Year 2005 – 2006 Politics of Balance The Conjuncture of Ethnic Party Formation and Development in Romania and Bulgaria Lilla Balázs M.A. Thesis in Advanced European and International Studies Academic Supervisor MATTHIAS WAECHTER Director of the DHEEI Nice, June 2006 1 Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Emergence of the Two Ethnic Parties 2.1. The Birth of New Nation States 2.2. Romania: Revolution and the “Morning After” 2.2.1. Timisoara and the Fall of Ceausescu 2.2.2. The “Morning After” and Formation of the DAHR 2.3. Bulgaria: Revolution and the “Morning After” 2.3.1. The Fall of Zhivkov 2.3.2. The “Morning After” and Formation of the MRF 3. Politics of Balance: the Two Parties at a Closer Look 3.1. The DAHR and the MRF: Two Ethnic Parties in Context 3.1.1. Ethnic Parties 3.1.2. The Context of Minority Ethnic Parties 3.2. The DAHR and its Context 3.2.1. The DAHR—Ethnic Organization in National Politics 3.2.2. The DAHR in Context 3.3. The MRF and its Context 2 3.3.1. The MRF—Ethnic Party of a National Type 3.3.2. The MRF in Context 3.4. Ethnic Party Politics: Politics of Balance 4. The Dynamic of Ethnic Party Politics in Romania and Bulgaria 4.1. The DAHR and Political Developments in Romania 4.1.1. Radicalism and Isolation: 1992-1996 4.1.2. Electoral Revolution and Participation: 1996-2000 4.1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol No. 5 of the Meeting of the Executive Committee of the CC of the RCP, on the Situation in Czechoslovakia
    Parallel History Project on NATO and the Warsaw Pact (PHP) April 2004 Romania and the Warsaw Pact, 1955–1989 www.isn.ethz.ch/php Edited by Dennis Deletant, Mihail E. Ionescu and Anna Locher ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Protocol No. 5 of the Meeting of the Executive Committee of the CC of the RCP, on the Situation in Czechoslovakia Bucharest, 21 August 1968 Participants in the meeting, comrades: Nicolae Ceasescu, Ion Gheorghe Maurer, Gheorghe Apostol, Alexandru Bârladeanu, Emil Bodnaras, Chivu Stoica, Paul Niculescu-Mizil, Virgil Trofin, Ilie Verdet, Maxim Berghianu, Florian Danalache, Constantin Dragan, Ianos Fazekas, Leonte Rautu, Vasile Vâlcu, Stefan Voitec, Iosif Banc, Petre Blajovici, Dumitru Coliu, Mihai Gere, Petre Lupu, Manea Manescu, Dumitru Popa, Dumitru Popescu, Gheorghe Stoica. Invited to participate in the meeting, comrades: Mihai Dalea, Vasile Patilinet. The meeting opens at 6:30 a.m. AGENDA: The situation created after the penetration of the armed forces of certain socialist countries into the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. Upon listening to Comrade Nicolae Ceausescu's briefing on the very serious situation created after the penetration in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic - without the knowledge and approval of that country's Party and State bodies, of the armed forces of the URSS, the Polish People's Republic, the Hungarian People's Republic, the People's Republic of Bulgaria and the German Democratic Republic - the Executive Committee of the CC of the RCP, decides as follows: • The Government of the Socialist Republic of Romania shall address a note to the five socialist countries whose troops occupied Czechoslovakia and express its concern about and disapproval of this act, the fact that it does not share at all the views stated in the TASS Communiqué, alleging that a counter-revolutionary situation was obtaining in Czechoslovakia which might have justified a military intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and Its Soft Underbelly Shafir, Michael
    www.ssoar.info Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly Shafir, Michael Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Shafir, M. (2012). Political antisemitism in Romania? Hard data and its soft underbelly. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 12(4), 557-603. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445667 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Political Antisemitism in Romania? 557 Political Antisemitism in Romania? Hard Data and its Soft Underbelly MICHAEL SHAFIR As in many other former communist countries of East Central Europe1, antisemitism in Romania resurged almost concomitantly with the demise of the former regime2. Empirical research on antisemitism, however, emerged only considerably later and did not take off as a main focus until the establishment of the National Institute for the Study of the Holocaust in Romania ”Elie Wiesel” (INSHREW) in 2005. This does not imply that the subject of Jews, attitudes to Jews measured by instruments such as stereotypic perceptions and/or ”social distance”, or attitudes toward controversial Romanian historical figures linked to the country’s antisemitic past was not tangentially or even directly tackled on occasion. What lacked until 2005, however, was an effort to systematically (among other instruments, employing a standard questionnaire capable of rendering comparative results) place under focus the phenomenon in its synchronic and diachronic unfolding.
    [Show full text]
  • 60 Years of Radio Free Europe in Munich and Prague
    VOICES OF FREEDOM – WESTERN INTERFERENCE? 60 YEARS OF RADIO FREE EUROPE IN MUNICH AND PRAGUE Radio Free Europe (RFE) began regular broadcasts from Munich sixty years ago with a news programme by its Czechoslovak department. To mark this anniversary, the Collegium Carolinum (Munich), together with the Czech Centre (Munich), and the Institute for the Study of Totalitarian Regimes (Prague) held the conference Voices of Freedom – Western Interference? 60 Years of Radio Free Europe in Munich and Prague from 28 to 30 April 2011 at Munich’s Ludwig-Maximilian University. The conference revolved around RFE’s role as one of the most political and polarizing of all international radio broadcasters in the Cold War context. What were the station’s goals and how did it go about achieving them? To what extent did RFE contribute to an exchange of information and knowledge between East and West? The station’s political significance and the importance attached to similar international media in current politics and foreign affairs were demonstrated not least by the fact that the conference was held under the auspices of the Bavarian Prime Minister Horst Seehofer and the Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg. This was also clear in the public discussion on the theme of “International Broadcasting Today” at America House with former RFE journalist and current President of Estonia Toomas Hendrik Ilves, US Consul General Conrad R. Tribble, political scientist and media expert Hans J. Kleinsteuber (University of Hamburg), Associate Director of Broadcasting at RFE/RL in Prague, Abbas Djavadi, and Ingo Mannteufel from the Deutsche Welle. In the introductions and contributions of this discussion the tensions between political regard for the station, scholarly insights, and the perspectives of contemporary witnesses that were felt throughout the conference were already apparent.
    [Show full text]
  • MONITORUL FICIA E.- PARTEA Twa Kele,AA.04.34.44
    r".7 FW 4kte.a,W414.4iAt4 .4.-104191re Anra CXVI Nr. 175 25 LEI EXEMPLARUL SimbAti 31 Tulle 1948. Ae442i-f, REPUBLICA POPULARAnomANA MONITORUL FICIA e.- PARTEA twa kele,AA.04.34.44. LEGI, DECRETE DECIZIUNI ALE CONSILIULUI DE MINISTRI, DECIZIUNI MINISTERIALE,COMUNICATE, ANUNTURI JUDICIARE (DE INTERES GENERAL) etc iewc 4031171:MOCIIIIIMP Desbaterile .Partea 1-a saua II-a ABONAMENTE iN LEI parlamentnre PUBLIdA IIIIN 1.E I inaerpa M.O. I on6Iani31uni1 lunasesiune I1 tuna LINIA iN TARA : DECRETE $1 JURNALE ALE CONSILIULU1 DE MINISTRI: 4Particulari 3.600 1.800 900 500 Peptru acordares avantajelor legii pentru incurajarea indus- Autoritati de Stat, judetsi comu-. triei la industrissi .71 fabricanti 6.000 Idem pentru meseriasi si mori taranesti tulle 1.500 ' 3.000 1.500 750 incetitenire si depuneri de juramant 2.003 Autoritati comunale rurale 2.500 1.250 625 autorizAri pentra rnfiintiri de birourt varnale 2000 DECIZII OlOrice abonali 2.500 500 Schimbari de ounre 2.000 INSTRA1NATATE 8.000 5.000 1.000CITATIILE: Curtilor de Casatie,Conturi,Apel,Tribunate t notari publici tinexemplar din anul curent lei.... 25 part. 1-aI 25 part. II-a 25 pa t. III-a 500 Judecatoriilor 250 anii expirati 50 50 " AMENAJAMENTE DE PADURI ,Abonarnentul lapartea Ill-a (Desbaterile parlamentare) pentrri sesiunile ordinare Priduri dintre 0 10 ha 150 10,01 20 .. 300 ........ , 500 prelungite sau extraordinare se socoteste 1.000 leI lunar (minimum 1 tuna). .1 20,01 100 100.01 209 2.000 Abonamentele si publicatiile pentru autorit8tiiparticulari se platesc anticipat. 1 200,01 500 3.000 ele vor fi insotite de o adresa din partea autoritatilor si de e cerere timbrata din 500,01-1000 4.000 trartea particularilor.
    [Show full text]
  • Jurnal Contemporan Fluxul Memoriei Prezenta Lucrare Este Un Pamflet Publicistic Şi Trebuie Tratată Ca Atare
    Ioan Pînzar Jurnal contemporan Fluxul memoriei Prezenta lucrare este un pamflet publicistic şi trebuie tratată ca atare. Ioan Pînzar Jurnal contemporan Fluxul memoriei Editura MUŞATINII Suceava, 2015 Consiliul Judeţean Suceava Preşedinte: Ioan Cătălin NECHIFOR Vicepreşedinţi: Ilie NIŢĂ, Alexandru RĂDULESCU Centrul Cultural „Bucovina“ Manager: Viorel VARVAROI Secţia pentru Conservarea şi Promovarea Culturii Tradiţionale Suceava Director: Călin BRĂTEANU Editura „Muşatinii” Suceava, str. Tipografiei nr. 1, Tel. 0230 523640, 0757 076885 (I.D.) Director general: Gheorghe DAVID tipar: Motto (mamei): În ce vară? În ce an? Anii trec ca apa. El era drumeţ sărman, Muncitor cu sapa. (George Topîrceanu) 5 Jurnal contemporan n anii luminoşi ai copilăriei mele, când s-a stins din viaţă tovarăşul ÎIosif Vissarionovici Stalin, trăia la Costâna şi mătuşa mea, Ecaterina, abia ieşită din adolescenţă, cu o gropiţă în obraji, cu părul roşu cârlionţat, de o blestemau flăcăii cu cântecul urbanEcaterino, vede-te-aş moartă/ Cu dric la poartă/ Şi cai mascaţi. Mama era înnebunită s-o mărite cu un flăcău bogat. Ea nici să audă. Şi-a găsit un tânăr chipeş, pe care l-a aşteptat să facă armata, s-a măritat şi a dus o lungă viaţă fericită, până ce s-a stins în anul 2012. Tânărul nu era bogat, dar hărnicia lor i-a îmbogăţit cu timpul. Despre generalissimul Stalin nu se putea spune atunci că a murit. S-a stins, a plecat de lângă noi, mă rog, expresii elegante. Ţăranii ar fi spus că a crăpat antihristul, nu credeau incă că va veni colhozul lui Stalin şi la noi. Numai bătrânul Feodor Karamazov, amorezat împreună cu Dimitri, fiul lui, de aceeaşi fată frumoasă şi neserioasă, Gruşenka, a strigat la moartea soţiei sale de-o viaţă, în faţa porţii, pe stradă: a crăpat căţeaua! Cred că la fel ar fi strigat şi genialul Tolstoi, dacă soţia lui nu ar fi fost mai tânără cu 15 ani decât el.
    [Show full text]