One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Executive Summary (2014) One-way alternative which carsharing: to Evaluating theimpactof Evaluating Carsharing will continue to develop sizeable a development potential has still and growth exponential an use transit whereas increased. has decreased, has mobility an reached has France in cars private of use The of impact the and interest Results of the first major survey about the impact of a one-way car one-way a of impact the about survey major first the of Results sharing service (the caseof Autolib’ inParis) one-way self-service programs self-service private cars? private one-way carsharing one-way car-based 1 practice through objective criteria. environment; cars; in order to measure and to understand its impacts carsharing round-trip Surveyon National French The full report isfor sale at www.6t.fr The fullreport tbra d rcece decided recherche de 6t-bureau - One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Executive Summary (2014) h am f h suy s o t prom plain a the phenomenonof one-way carsharing. perform to not is analysis of studyParisian Autolib’ the users, but to better grasp of aim The way. occasional an in reservation prior without or with vehicle a of use to people allows that environments, urban in located time system,the ofrental Amost car self-service Carsharing: thephenomenon of Understanding featuring interurbanorsuburbantrips. and driven km 100 than more to corresponding day,a least at is time rental observed average in hours 24 least at reserved generally be must vehicle The transaction. each for commission a private charge also and system, the out carryinsurance between made is individuals. Operators responsible for billing and transaction The area). (downtown perimeter restricted a within place taking trips featuring km, 9 of distance a for minutes 40 is time rental observed average the and advance in to hours possible not several is it returned It be reserve station. to starting have the not to does vehicle The trips, or at least trips going beyond the suburban city center.especially featuring driven, km 40 to observed rental lasts for 5 hours and corresponds advancereservein severalto hours possible and The vehicle is returned to the starting station. It is system » classic « or Round-trip Peer-to-peer (P2P) system (P2P) Peer-to-peer system One-way STUDY FIGURES: STUDY Recruited throughtwo channels: 1 169respondents Paris metropolitan the outside programs carsharing round-trip to 2014. surveyJanuaryonline to 1 November2013 conductedfrom other transportation modes. other transportation of and carsharing of use the characterize to questions 200 2 one-way carsharing one-way 1,940 subscribers One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Executive Summary (2014) transportation transportation Autolib’: asolutiondeemed Autolib’: byattracted theservice Autolib’ have and incomes higherthantheregional average. executives are (64%) them of Most average: the than educated Autolib’more are subscribers Autolib’ for commuting isfound to besizeable service lessthanthree timesamonth. other carsharing users (more than 80%) use the the of most whereas week, a twice than more 6% car cheaper than the service is state that 18% transportation service ismore state thatthe 25% 57% of Autolib’ members use the service users are users a substitute to private cars cars a substitutetoprivate

of than othercarsharingusers. transportation public of perception prefer strongly private cars and have do a more negative users Autolib’ mainly executives mainly the use ofuse the more practical thanpublic practical more , but 3 without the parking constraint without theparking reserved parkingplaces asthemainreason. the quote car private a than practical more is Autolib’ that think who users Autolib’ of 67% some in Autolib’ role using of minor decision the a only play values in second place The economic motivations only come students are also students are Autolib’students attracts 32 6

%

%

ecological v

One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Two cars ormore

Executive Summary (2014) >> Carsharing systemsand Carsharing cars Two ormore One car their subscription. owned by Autolib’ usersafter number of private vehicles A Autolib’ (one-way carsharingintheParis metropolitanregion) No car One car subscription. by Mobizen usersafter their of private vehicles A No car 23% reductioninthe 67% reductioninthenumber Autolib’ Before Mobizen Before 37% 50% 13% 41% 56% 3% Autolib’ After Mobizen After 10% 30% 60% owned 87% 10% 3% spaces. private cars An demotorization

Autolib’ frees An metropolitan region) >> Mobizen leisure trips(sport, culture, nature…). Autolib’ isalsousedfor commuting. compared toa week day); dayweekenda in more (23% weekendsduring peak a km.Rentalsreach 9 of remain aminority though; trips of types suburbs.These the from and to trips some are locations,there it makes city.ofParis outside live suburbs customers who havethe Givenvariety to ofpossible the in service the of availability the Nevertheless, Paris. commuting. for used never almost is Mobizen nature,…). culture, (sport, trips leisure by day compared toa week day); 40 km. Rentals reach a sharp peak during weekends (89% more in a weekend of Pariscity; The average rental lasts for 40 minutes and corresponds to a driven distance

6 parkingspaces. The main purposes of Autolib’ trips are family or friends visits, followed byfollowed visits, friends of Autolib’ or purposes family main are The trips Autolib’ is a transportation mode mainly used by Parisians moving within moving Parisians by used mainly mode transportation Autolib’a is The mains purposes of Mobizen’ trips are family or friends visits, followed visits,friends or family Mobizen’are of trips purposes mains The The average rental lasts for 5 hours and corresponds to a driven distance of

vehicle replaces Mobizen is a transportation mode mainly used by Parisians to go outside go to byParisians used mainly mode transportation a is Mobizen andfrees oie (on-rp asaig n h Paris the in carsharing (round-trip Mobizen replaces 4 2 parking 7 private cars 3 and (private vehicle + Autolib’). vehicle kilometer travelled A stated Mobizen cars). travelled in the vehicle-kilometer A stated 11% decrease inthe per month/per user - 43km per monthper intotal - 1849000km 45 %decrease per month/per user - 127 (private vehicle + per monthper intotal - 308229

km

km km

l

i

b

è

r e

per month/per user - 127 per monthper intotal - 308229

km

km km

l

i

b

è

r e

One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Executive Summary (2014) transportation modes transportation Autolib’ competes with private cars Autolib’ competeswithprivate two- users wheeler motorized of expectations the to responds characteristic This carsharing. one-way by offered two-wheelers... >> Evolution of theshareof respondents who daily modesbefore and usedifferent transportation

uoi’ lo elcs motorized replaces also Autolib’ after subscribingto acarsharingsystem. , but alsowithalltheother 5 companies taxi from after joining Autolib’, number of users who never use the taxi has doubled in taxiuse. >>

... and contributes to a strong fall strong a to contributes and ... Autolib’ has taken market share market Autolib’taken has eie, the Besides, One-way carsharing: which alternative to private cars? Executive Summary (2014) sustainable mobility carsharing one-way How tomake themostof modes (transit, transportation bicycle,…): complementary with integration an about and systems different the certainly will carsharing of development The program (16% vs. 13%«every day oralmost»). carsharing a than joining before drive often to used they more carsharing use that subscribers makes convenience Autolib’s Therefore, (combining the different transportation modes). trips multimodal feature not does that uses of pattern a for ground the set can Convenience panel

biking, walking, etc.). Somehow, only 2%of Autolib’ subscribershave signedupto Mobizen as well. of(transit, options Autolib’ transportation alternative of set whole the continueusing and only) subscribers the ones displaying the most ecological mobility practices: 87% of them do not own a car (compared to 60% are Autolib’Mobizenboth toand subscribing peopleBesides,options. mobilitycomplementarypotentially Even if round-trip and one-way systems are similar, their impacts are not the same: they are two different, yet THE COMPLEMENTARITY OF ROUND-TRIP AND ONE-WAY CARSHARING A MONITORING PANEL ? 6t created a monitoring a created 6t 6 alternative transportation modeseveryalternative transportation day. different the combine to users carsharing trip round- encourage to tend together offer dense less the and reservation mandatory the trips, offer the of density the on

infos in order inorder + w.6t.fr isfor saleat ww The fullreport [email protected] [email protected] 01 53092636 6t-bureau derecherche Nicolas Louvet to trigger h return The -

ref. 6t n°1441 ref. ADEME n°8167