CARSHARING a Vehicle for Sustainable Mobility in Emerging Markets?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CARSHARING a Vehicle for Sustainable Mobility in Emerging Markets? WORLD WRI ROSS CENTER FOR RESOURCES SUSTAINABLE INSTITUTE CITIES CARSHARING A Vehicle for Sustainable Mobility in Emerging Markets? WRICITIES.ORG Carsharing: A Vehicle For Sustainable Mobility In Emerging Markets? i CLAYTON LANE HESHUANG ZENG CHHAVI DHINGRA AILEEN CARRIGAN This report was made possible through funding from Shell Foundation, Stephen M. Ross Philanthropies, and Volkswagen Group Research. Design and layout by: Julie Moretti [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Foreword 3 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 13 Methodology 21 Current Status of Carsharing in Emerging Markets 35 Social and Environmental Impact 41 Barriers and Opportunities 47 Potential Markets 51 Operational Models 59 Conclusion 63 References 67 Endnotes 69 Acknowledgments iv WRICities.org FOREWORD Cities have the potential to become powerful engines Carsharing has the potential to increase carless of social and environmental progress, lifting households’ mobility and access to goods, services, hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and and opportunities and, in some markets, it might ensuring the sustainability of our planet. But rapid even delay the decision to purchase a car. If urbanization also poses substantial challenges. carsharing takes root in emerging markets before Poorly planned, sprawling cities can threaten car ownership becomes ubiquitous, households quality of life, worsen pollution and public health, might opt to share a car instead of owning one. and undermine efforts to sustain economic growth. Their need for occasional auto use will be satisfied Perhaps no trend accelerates these challenges while they primarily rely on walking, biking, more than rapid motorization—advancing personal and public transit for day-to-day mobility. In this mobility, but threatening virtually every measure of way, carsharing could be an effective element of sustainability, from road safety to climate stability. a sustainable transportation system in emerging markets. Carsharing can provide a powerful mobility alternative for emerging markets, where the pace However, the success of carsharing in emerging of urbanization and motorization is highest. markets faces serious obstacles. Many people in The carsharing concept is simple: individuals the growing middle class aspire to own a car, while gain the benefits of car use without the costs cities are plagued by acute congestion and lack of and responsibilities of ownership. Carsharing available or adequately regulated parking. And cities can increase mobility and access, even while are increasingly imposing restrictions and economic reducing vehicle-kilometers traveled and negative disincentives on the purchase and use of vehicles, environmental impacts of driving. including shared vehicles, to address growing congestion, pollution, and accidents. While well established in developed countries, carsharing is nascent in emerging markets. The Despite these obstacles, recent growth of potential of carsharing here could be very large, but carsharing in India and China has far outpaced little is known about its markets, viability, or social their predecessors in established markets of the and environmental impacts. United States and Europe. This suggests that there are carsharing markets ripe for development if WRI seeks to fill this knowledge gap. We have stakeholders can minimize barriers. completed the first comprehensive study of carsharing in emerging markets. To develop an Sustainable cities are fundamentally dependent on initial understanding of the feasibility of carsharing sustainable transportation. Innovative businesses, in these cities, we reviewed existing literature governments, and academics could use WRI’s findings and interviewed mobility experts and carsharing to further support and cultivate carsharing, ensuring operators. Focus groups with targeted communities it becomes an important part of urban transport in Hangzhou, China and Bangalore, India revealed systems in rapidly urbanizing emerging markets. perceptions of carsharing. And a global scan of the industry inventoried carsharing operations in emerging markets over time. The carsharing industry in emerging markets is expanding quickly. In the past year, carsharing was introduced in 19 cities. This year nearly 898,000 Andrew Steer members will share more than 9,200 vehicles across President and CEO 41 cities in emerging markets. World Resources Institute Carsharing: A Vehicle For Sustainable Mobility In Emerging Markets? 1 2 WRICities.org EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Modern carsharing has experienced rapid growth since it was introduced in Switzerland in 1987 (Millard-Ball et al. 2005). Today, over 4.8 million members share more than 104,000 vehicles worldwide (Shaheen 2015). With large corporations entering the industry during the last decade, the scale and variety of carsharing programs/services have grown exponentially.1 Despite global growth of the industry, only a small number of carsharing services operate in emerging markets.2 About 78 percent of the world’s urban population lives in Africa, Asia, and Latin America and the Caribbean, but these regions accounted for only 20 percent of global carsharing membership in 2014 (UN 2015; Shaheen 2015). Because of the limited history of carsharing in less developed countries, little is known about this transport mode’s business viability or social and environmental impacts. Carsharing: A Vehicle For Sustainable Mobility In Emerging Markets? 3 Carsharing might catalyze auto driving in coun- bers sharing more than 3,400 vehicles. Recent tries with very low car ownership, by lowering the start-ups show rapid growth, faster than their barrier to access; or it might decrease future auto predecessors in established markets, suggesting driving by providing an effective alternative to car the existence of a ready market if operational ownership before motorization has run its course. barriers can be tackled. This research develops an initial under- Carsharing has the potential to increase ▪ standing of the feasibility of carsharing as mobility and access to goods, a sustainable mobility option in emerging services, and opportunities for carless markets.3 The research develops this understand- households, (Shaheen and Cohen 2007; ing through literature reviews; interviews with Cervero 2003, 2007; Lane 2005). It also has mobility experts and carsharing operators (CSOs); the potential to delay or replace car purchase longitudinal industry scans of where carsharing is plans in Hangzhou and to a lesser extent in active in emerging markets; and focus-group dis- Bangalore. In the focus groups conducted cussions with targeted communities in Hangzhou, by WRI in October 2012, about 48 percent China and Bangalore, India. This research seeks to of participants in Hangzhou said they would gain initial insights into the following questions: consider delaying or forgoing car purchase plans if carsharing were conveniently available. 1. What is the current status of the industry in In Bangalore, the level was around 30 percent. emerging markets? The authors hypothesize that carsharing might increase auto driving when first introduced, 2. What are the main barriers to and because predominantly carless households gain opportunities for implementation? affordable access to cars; but decrease auto driving in the long term because a significant 3. What are the potential markets? portion of members stay with the service and delay or eliminate car purchase plans. 4. How should carsharing systems be designed in these markets? The target demographic in emerging ▪ 5. What might be the societal and markets seems to be similar to environmental impacts? demographics in mature markets: well-educated, mostly carless, middle- income, young to middle-aged, urban By developing preliminary insights about these residents. However, differences in market important aspects of carsharing, WRI aims to interest between Hangzhou (high interest) inform academics, entrepreneurs, operators, and, and Bangalore (medium interest) suggest to a lesser extent, policymakers, about the percep- that market readiness varies widely, possibly tions, opportunities, challenges, and potential in relation to income and the availability impact of carsharing in emerging markets. of attractive transport alternatives such as chauffeur-driven cars, motorized two-wheelers, Key research findings yield initial insights that auto-rickshaws, and taxis. include: Carsharing as a form of shared mobility ▪ faces major barriers in some emerging The carsharing industry in emerging ▪ markets is small but expanding quickly markets—such as aspiration to personal in 2015, with at least 22 start-ups operat- car ownership; severe road congestion and associated driving stresses; insufficient ing more than 9,200 vehicles in Brazil, China, complementary walk, bike, and transit India, Malaysia, Mexico, South Africa, and Tur- systems; easily available, affordable labor to key, serving nearly 898,000 members.4 These act as personal chauffeurs (India); potential figures are up dramatically from mid-2014, competition from well-established informal when the authors estimated 141,200 mem- 4 WRICities.org and intermediate public transport modes like ing in emerging markets might also be keys to auto-rickshaws and taxis;5 limited available the success of carsharing programs. In focus and adequately regulated on-street parking; groups, prospective members express interest vehicle registration or use restrictions that limit in one-way service, vehicles with drivers, con- expansion (China); and
Recommended publications
  • The Deloitte City Mobility Index Gauging Global Readiness for the Future of Mobility
    The Deloitte City Mobility Index Gauging global readiness for the future of mobility By: Simon Dixon, Haris Irshad, Derek M. Pankratz, and Justine Bornstein the Internet of Things, artificial intelligence, and Where should cities other digital technologies to develop and inform go tomorrow? intelligent decisions about people, places, and prod- ucts. A smart city is a data-driven city, one in which Unfortunately, when it comes to designing and municipal leaders have an increasingly sophisti- implementing a long-term vision for future mobil- cated understanding of conditions in the areas they ity, it is all too easy to ignore, misinterpret, or skew oversee, including the urban transportation system. this data to fit a preexisting narrative.1 We have seen In the past, regulators used questionnaires and sur- this play out in dozens of conversations with trans- veys to map user needs. Today, platform operators portation leaders all over the world. To build that can rely on databases to provide a more accurate vision, leaders need to gather the right data, ask the picture in a much shorter time frame at a lower cost. right questions, and focus on where cities should Now, leaders can leverage a vast array of data from go tomorrow. The Deloitte City Mobility Index Given the essential enabling role transportation theme analyses how deliberate and forward- plays in a city’s sustained economic prosperity,2 we thinking a city’s leaders are regarding its future set out to create a new and better way for city of- mobility needs. ficials to gauge the health of their mobility network 3.
    [Show full text]
  • S.No Category Merchant Offer Details Type of Offer Merchant Link Eligible
    S.No Category Merchant Offer Details Type of Offer Merchant Link Eligible Card Type Offer Location Offer Validity PROMO CODE Offer Terms and Conditions How to redeem 1. The Offer is valid till 31 May 2021. 2. Under this Offer, Cardholders get Rs.500 Off on spend of Rs.1000 or above, using the promotion code MASTERCARD500 at https://www.cubmcpaws.com 3. Offer is not applicable on international deliveries. Offer valid only on Cub McPaws India website. 4. The Offer is available only upon making full payment by a valid and unexpired Mastercard card issued in India. Offer is not valid for Cash on Delivery. 5. To redeem this offer, cardholders should login to their account or create an account, if they are not registered. 6. The Offer is non-transferable and cannot be exchanged for cash or cheque or any form of credit. 7. Total spends will be calculated on the basis of product cost only excluding all taxes, GST, delivery charges, etc. Any taxes or liabilities or charges payable to the Government or any other authority or body, if any, shall be borne directly by the cardholder and/ or billed to the account of the cardholder On the Check out page , click the promotion tab, and 8. Any dispute regarding delivery, service, suitability, merchantability, availability or quality of the offer/or product/services availed under this offer must be choose MASTERCARD500 from the drop down All Cards issued in addressed in writing, by the cardholder directly to Cub McPaws at [email protected] or by calling +91-8779925527.
    [Show full text]
  • Télécharger La Synthèse De L'enquête Nationale Sur L'autopartage 2019
    Enquête nationale sur l’autopartage - Edition 2019 Actualisation et étude de l’impact des services d’autopartage sur l’équipement des ménages et sur les kilomètres parcourus en voiture UNE ÉTUDE RÉALISÉE PAR 6T-BUREAU DE RECHERCHE SUR UN COFINANCEMENT 6T ET ADEME Contexte Enjeux Publiées en 2012 et 2016, les deux premières Tout comme en 2012 et 2016, l’édition 2019 porte éditions de l’Enquête Nationale sur l’Autopartage1 principalement sur l’autopartage en boucle. Elle vise constituaient les premières études d’envergure sur deux objectifs : les usagers, usages et impacts de l’autopartage en France. mettre à jour les résultats de la précédente édition : les usagers, usages et impacts de l’autopartage ont- Menées auprès d’au moins 2 000 usagers abonnés ils évolué entre 2016 et 2019 ? d’une vingtaine de services d’autopartage différents, ces enquêtes ont mis en évidence l’effet « déclencheur affiner la compréhension des usagers, usages et de multimodalité » de l’autopartage en boucle : impacts de l’autopartage : notamment, qui sont les l’autopartage permet aux habitants des villes de usagers de l’autopartage ? Une fois abonnés à s’affranchir de la voiture individuelle, de découvrir l’autopartage, leurs pratiques de déplacements et de s’approprier d’autres modes de déplacement. évoluent-elles de la même manière ? Quels sont les usages et les impacts de l’autopartage entre Trois ans après la dernière enquête, l’autopartage particuliers et de l’autopartage en contexte joue-t-il encore le même rôle dans la mobilité professionnel ? urbaine ? Ses usagers sont-ils restés les mêmes ? Ses usages, ses impacts ont-ils évolué ? Le rapport d’étude complet est disponible sur notre blog : Lien Autopartage B2C en boucle : (fr Autopartage B2C en trace Autopartage entre l’objet principal de l’étude directe particuliers ou P2P Le véhicule est rendu dans la Avec stations : le véhicule peut Réalisée entre particuliers station de départ.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Brands
    Global Consumer 2019 List of Brands Table of Contents 1. Digital music 2 2. Video-on-Demand 4 3. Video game stores 7 4. Digital video games shops 11 5. Video game streaming services 13 6. Book stores 15 7. eBook shops 19 8. Daily newspapers 22 9. Online newspapers 26 10. Magazines & weekly newspapers 30 11. Online magazines 34 12. Smartphones 38 13. Mobile carriers 39 14. Internet providers 42 15. Cable & satellite TV provider 46 16. Refrigerators 49 17. Washing machines 51 18. TVs 53 19. Speakers 55 20. Headphones 57 21. Laptops 59 22. Tablets 61 23. Desktop PC 63 24. Smart home 65 25. Smart speaker 67 26. Wearables 68 27. Fitness and health apps 70 28. Messenger services 73 29. Social networks 75 30. eCommerce 77 31. Search Engines 81 32. Online hotels & accommodation 82 33. Online flight portals 85 34. Airlines 88 35. Online package holiday portals 91 36. Online car rental provider 94 37. Online car sharing 96 38. Online ride sharing 98 39. Grocery stores 100 40. Banks 104 41. Online payment 108 42. Mobile payment 111 43. Liability insurance 114 44. Online dating services 117 45. Online event ticket provider 119 46. Food & restaurant delivery 122 47. Grocery delivery 125 48. Car Makes 129 Statista GmbH Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1 20355 Hamburg Tel. +49 40 2848 41 0 Fax +49 40 2848 41 999 [email protected] www.statista.com Steuernummer: 48/760/00518 Amtsgericht Köln: HRB 87129 Geschäftsführung: Dr. Friedrich Schwandt, Tim Kröger Commerzbank AG IBAN: DE60 2004 0000 0631 5915 00 BIC: COBADEFFXXX Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 258551386 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated Annual Financial Statements
    BARLOWORLD LIMITED CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT 30 SEPTEMBER 2020 Group Finance Director’s Review Financial performance for the year ended 30 September 2020 Group revenue for the year decreased by 17% to R49.7 billion (2019: R60.2 billion). Equipment Southern Africa’s revenue declined by 14% against the prior year but strong against the COVID-19 impact forecast resulting largely from good mining machine sales and resilient aftermarket activity levels. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical challenges Equipment Eurasia revenue increased by 22% benefiting from strong levels of mining activity, particularly in the gold sector. Equipment Eurasia represents our combined Russian and Mongolian Caterpillar operations. Included is one month’s trading results for Barloworld Mongolia that was acquired on 1 September 2020. The Automotive revenue, excluding NMI-DSM which is now equity accounted for, was down 15% in the current year. On a positive note strong used vehicle sales volumes and margins in this segment are being maintained, with cash generation supported by the disposal of properties as well as the right size of the Avis businesses fleet. In Logistics, revenue declined by 27% against the prior year on the back of the contraction of the Transport and Supply Chain Management markets resulting from weaker demand for goods and services. The weakening ZAR resulted in a year to date increase in revenue of R1.3 billion (2.8%) with the bulk of the increase in Equipment Southern Africa and Russia. The EBITDA of R4.8 billion was 25% down (2019: R6.5 billion) with the impact of IFRS 16: Leases for the 2020 financial year, being a favourable R549 million in leasing charges no longer included in EBITDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Attendees
    Registered Attendees Company Name Job Title Country/Region 1996 Graduate Trainee (Aquaculturist) Zambia 1Life MI Manager South Africa 27four Executive South Africa Sales & Marketing: Microsoft 28twelve consulting Technologies United States 2degrees ETL Developer New Zealand SaaS (Software as a Service) 2U Adminstrator South Africa 4 POINT ZERO INVEST HOLDINGS PROJECT MANAGER South Africa 4GIS Chief Data Scientist South Africa Lead - Product Development - Data 4Sight Enablement, BI & Analytics South Africa 4Teck IT Software Developer Botswana 4Teck IT (PTY) LTD Information Technology Consultant Botswana 4TeckIT (pty) Ltd Director of Operations Botswana 8110195216089 System and Data South Africa Analyst Customer Value 9Mobile Management & BI Nigeria Analyst, Customer Value 9mobile Management Nigeria 9mobile Nigeria (formerly Etisalat Specialist, Product Research & Nigeria). Marketing. Nigeria Head of marketing and A and A utilities limited communications Nigeria A3 Remote Monitoring Technologies Research Intern India AAA Consult Analyst Nigeria Aaitt Holdings pvt ltd Business Administrator South Africa Aarix (Pty) Ltd Managing Director South Africa AB Microfinance Bank Business Data Analyst Nigeria ABA DBA Egypt Abc Data Analyst Vietnam ABEO International SAP Consultant Vietnam Ab-inbev Senior Data Analyst South Africa Solution Architect & CTO (Data & ABLNY Technologies AI Products) Turkey Senior Development Engineer - Big ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Data South Africa ABna Conseils Data/Analytics Lead Architect Canada ABS Senior SAP Business One
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models
    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report
    On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Program Evaluation Report JANUARY 2017 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY | SUSTAINABLE STREETS DIVISION | PARKING 1 On-Street Car Sharing Pilot Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GOAL: “MAKE TRANSIT, WALKING, BICYCLING, TAXI, RIDE SHARING AND CARSHARING THE PREFERRED MEANS OF TRAVEL.” (SFMTA STRATEGIC PLAN) As part of SFpark and the San Francisco Findings Municipal Transportation Agency’s (SFMTA) effort to better manage parking demand, • On-street car share vehicles were in use an the SFMTA conducted a pilot of twelve on- average of six hours per day street car share spaces (pods) in 2011-2012. • 80% of vehicles were shared by at least ten The SFMTA then carried out a large-scale unique users pilot to test the use of on-street parking • An average of 19 unique users shared each spaces as pods for shared vehicles. The vehicle monthly On-Street Car Share Parking Permit Pilot (Pilot) was approved by the SFMTA’s Board • 17% of car share members reported selling of Directors in July 2013 and has been or donating a car due to car sharing operational since April 2014. This report presents an evaluation of the Pilot. Placing car share spaces on-street increases shared vehicle access, Data from participating car share convenience, and visibility. We estimate organizations show that the Pilot pods that car sharing as a whole has eliminated performed well, increased awareness of thousands of vehicles from San Francisco car sharing overall, and suggest demand streets. The Pilot showed promise as a tool for on-street spaces in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-03 Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area
    Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report | Report Number 20-03 | February 2020 NYSERDA’s Promise to New Yorkers: NYSERDA provides resources, expertise, and objective information so New Yorkers can make confident, informed energy decisions. Mission Statement: Advance innovative energy solutions in ways that improve New York’s economy and environment. Vision Statement: Serve as a catalyst – advancing energy innovation, technology, and investment; transforming New York’s economy; and empowering people to choose clean and efficient energy as part of their everyday lives. Residential Carshare Study for the New York Metropolitan Area Final Report Prepared for: New York State Energy Research and Development Authority New York, NY Robyn Marquis, PhD Project Manager, Clean Transportation Prepared by: WXY Architecture + Urban Design New York, NY Adam Lubinsky, PhD, AICP Managing Principal Amina Hassen Associate Raphael Laude Urban Planner with Barretto Bay Strategies New York, NY Paul Lipson Principal Luis Torres Senior Consultant and Empire Clean Cities NYSERDA Report 20-03 NYSERDA Contract 114627 February 2020 Notice This report was prepared by WXY Architecture + Urban Design, Barretto Bay Strategies, and Empire Clean Cities in the course of performing work contracted for and sponsored by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (hereafter the "Sponsors"). The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the Sponsors or the State of New York, and reference to any specific product, service, process, or method does not constitute an implied or expressed recommendation or endorsement of it. Further, the Sponsors, the State of New York, and the contractor make no warranties or representations, expressed or implied, as to the fitness for particular purpose or merchantability of any product, apparatus, or service, or the usefulness, completeness, or accuracy of any processes, methods, or other information contained, described, disclosed, or referred to in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Bus Rapid Transit Feasiblity Study
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 MODES AND TRENDS THAT FACILITATE BRT ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Microtransit ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Shared Mobility .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Mobility Hubs ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2.4 Curbside Management .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3 VEHICLES THAT SUPPORT BRT OPERATIONS ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Automated Vehicles .................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices
    SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikesharing Research and Programs
    Bikesharing Research and Programs • Audio: – Via Computer - No action needed – Via Telephone – Mute computer speakers, call 1-866-863-9293 passcode 12709537 • Presentations by: – Allen Greenberg, Federal Highway Administration, [email protected] – Susan Shaheen, University of California Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center, [email protected] – Darren Buck, DC Department of Transportation, [email protected] – Nick Bohnenkamp, Denver B-Cycle, [email protected] • Audience Q&A – addressed after each presentation, please type your questions into the chat area on the right side of the screen • Closed captioning is available at: http://www.fedrcc.us//Enter.aspx?EventID=2345596&CustomerID=321 • Recordings and Materials from Previous Webinars: – http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/revenue/road_pricing/resources/webinars/congestion_pricing_2011.htm PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS Susan A. Shaheen, Ph.D. Transportation Sustainability Research Center University of California, Berkeley FHWA Bikesharing Webinar April 2, 2014 Bikesharing defined Worldwide and US bikesharing numbers Study background Carsharing in North America by the numbers Operator understanding Impacts Acknowledgements Bikesharing organizations maintain fleets of bicycles in a network of locations Stations typically unattended, concentrated in urban settings and provide a variety of pickup and dropoff locations Allows individuals to access shared bicycles on an as-needed basis Subscriptions offered in short-term (1-7 Day) and long-term (30-365
    [Show full text]