DOCSLIB.ORG

Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benchmarking of Existing Business / Operating Models & Best Practices SHared automation Operating models for Worldwide adoption SHOW Grant Agreement Number: 875530 D2.1.: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices This report is part of a project that has received funding by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 875530 Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above-referenced consortium members shall have no liability to third parties for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. © 2020 by SHOW Consortium. This report is subject to a disclaimer and copyright. This report has been carried out under a contract awarded by the European Commission, contract number: 875530. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the SHOW project. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 2 Executive Summary D2.1 provides the state-of-the-art for business and operating roles in the field of mobility services (MaaS, LaaS and DRT containing the mobility services canvas as description of the selected representative mobility services, the business and operating models describing relevant business factors and operation environment, the user and role analysis representing the involved user and roles for the mobility services (providing, operating and using the service) as well as identifying the success and failure models of the analysed mobility services and finally a KPI-Analysis (business- driven) to give a structured economical evaluation as base for the benchmarking. The final overall evaluation – the benchmarking – as the last part of D2.1 providing a base for the development of the new business and operating models A2.2 and the market analysis in A16.1. D2.1 has 3 main elements the basic are represented in chapter 2 methodology and chapter 3 containing the relevant information for the benchmarking and best practices evaluation, chapter 4 to chapter 9 containing the state-of-the-art of mobility services covering PTO, LaaS, DRT services, car sharing, MaaS and demo site mobility services and last but not least chapter 10, which benchmarks the input from chapter 4 to chapter 9 using the methodology and the input of chapter 3 as well as providing 7 best practices (business and operating models) for the further development work in A2.2. It has to be mentioned that the selection of demo sites for chapter 9 has been made based on availability and quality of demo site data and to cover most relevant MaaS solution as well as their market maturity. It should be noted that all figures in this document are taken from publicly available sources and normally provided by the companies themselves. D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 3 Document Control Sheet Start date of project: 01 January 2020 Duration: 48 months SHOW Del. ID & Title: D2.1 Benchmarking of existing business /operating models & best practices Dissemination level: PU A2.1 Benchmarking of existing business / Relevant Activities: operating models and best practices Work package: WP2 – Business models and roles Lead authors: Jörg Worschech (IESTA) Other authors involved: Albert Serra (BAX) Ralf Willenbrock, Romina Quaranta (T- SYS) Mihai Chirca, Christine Peyrot, Louis-René Chabannes (TRANSDEV) Alberto Bellini (SWARCO) Sevket Oguz Kagan Capkin (CTLUP) Cilli Sobiech, Sigma Dolins (RISE) Jenny Weidenauer (IESTA) Internal Reviewers: VEDECOM VUB CERTH/HIT External Reviewers: N/A Actual submission date: 12/10/2020 Status: Submitted File Name: SHOW_D2_1_Benchmark-Business- Operating-Models_SUBMITTED D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 4 Document Revision History Version Date Reason Editor 0.1 21/04/2020 Initial creation W. Rom, J. Worschech (IESTA) 0.2 30/07/2020 Input for Introduction and J. Worschech (IESTA) Methodology 0.3 15/08/2020 Input to all chapters and J. Weidenauer (IESTA) first complete draft C. Sobiech, S. Dolins (RISE) M. Chirca, (Transdev) A. Serra (BAX) A. Bellini (SWARCO) R. Quaranta (T-SYSs) 1.0 21/09/2020 Version sent for internal J. Worschech, J. peer review. Weidenauer (IESTA) 2.0 01/10/2020 Peer reviewed version J. Worschech, J. sent for submission. Weidenauer (IESTA) 2.1 12/10/2020 Corrections to previous J. Worschech, J. version Weidenauer (IESTA) 3.0 12/10/2020 Version finalized for H. Cornet (UITP) second submission D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 5 Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 3 Table of Contents ...................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables ........................................................................................................... 12 List of Figures.......................................................................................................... 15 Abbreviation List ...................................................................................................... 19 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 22 1.1 Purpose of the document .......................................................................... 22 1.2 Intended Audience .................................................................................... 22 1.3 Interrelations ............................................................................................. 22 1.4 Shared Mobility Services, Connectivity and Automated Vehicles .............. 23 2 Methodological Approach ................................................................................. 24 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 24 2.2 Basic boundary conditions ........................................................................ 24 2.3 SHOW Methodological Approach .............................................................. 24 2.3.1 Methodological Approach ................................................................... 25 2.3.2 Mobility Services Canvas ................................................................... 27 2.3.3 Business Model Canvas ..................................................................... 30 2.3.4 Value Proposition Canvas .................................................................. 31 2.3.5 Business impact and KPI ................................................................... 32 2.3.6 Workshops & Interviews ..................................................................... 33 2.3.7 Benchmarking .................................................................................... 35 3 Mobility Drivers, KPI and Metrics of SHOW ...................................................... 37 3.1 The role of Business Model Innovation in sustainable mobility transition ... 37 3.2 Identification of SHOW mobility drivers ..................................................... 37 3.2.1 Users ................................................................................................. 38 3.2.2 Technology ........................................................................................ 41 3.2.3 Policy ................................................................................................. 44 3.3 CCAVs Business/Operating Models: success/failure factors and indicators 46 3.3.1 Value chain ........................................................................................ 46 3.3.2 Knowledge of the technology ............................................................. 47 3.3.3 Other major elements ......................................................................... 48 D2.1: Benchmarking of existing business / operating models & best practices 6 3.3.4 Suggestions for a way forward ........................................................... 49 3.4 Identification of SHOW Business Model KPIs and corresponding metrics . 50 3.4.1 SHOW Business Model KPIs ............................................................. 51 3.4.2 Situational variables ........................................................................... 55 3.4.3 Calculation of Market indicators ......................................................... 56 3.5 Business model exploitation: scalability and transferability ........................ 59 3.5.1 Business model scalability ................................................................. 59 3.5.2 Business model transferability ............................................................ 61 4 Overview and Analysis of Public Transport / PTO services .............................. 63 4.1 State of the Art of several PT networks / PT operators worldwide ............. 64 4.1.1 The Public Transport Network in Rouen Metropolis ............................ 68 4.1.2 The PT Network in Kista, Stockholm .................................................. 76 4.1.3 The PT Network in Vienna ................................................................. 83 4.2 Business and operating models using Canvas Methodology ..................... 89 4.2.1 Business models of Public Transportation .......................................... 89 4.2.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Century of Scholarship 1881 – 2004
    A Century of Scholarship 1881 – 2004 Distinguished Scholars Reception Program (Date – TBD) Preface A HUNDRED YEARS OF SCHOLARSHIP AND RESEARCH AT MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY DISTINGUISHED SCHOLARS’ RECEPTION (DATE – TBD) At today’s reception we celebrate the outstanding accomplishments, excluding scholarship and creativity of Marquette remarkable records in many non-scholarly faculty, staff and alumni throughout the pursuits. It is noted that the careers of last century, and we eagerly anticipate the some alumni have been recognized more coming century. From what you read in fully over the years through various this booklet, who can imagine the scope Alumni Association awards. and importance of the work Marquette people will do during the coming hundred Given limitations, it is likely that some years? deserving individuals have been omitted and others have incomplete or incorrect In addition, this gathering honors the citations in the program listing. Apologies recipient of the Lawrence G. Haggerty are extended to anyone whose work has Faculty Award for Research Excellence, not been properly recognized; just as as well as recognizing the prestigious prize scholarship is a work always in progress, and the man for whom it is named. so is the compilation of a list like the one Presented for the first time in the year that follows. To improve the 2000, the award has come to be regarded completeness and correctness of the as a distinguishing mark of faculty listing, you are invited to submit to the excellence in research and scholarship. Graduate School the names of individuals and titles of works and honors that have This program lists much of the published been omitted or wrongly cited so that scholarship, grant awards, and major additions and changes can be made to the honors and distinctions among database.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenario-Based Traffic Forecasts for Routes Between the Penta Ports in 2020
    TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLICATIONS FROM THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 65 2013 SCENARIO-BASED TRAFFIC FORECASTS FOR ROUTES BETWEEN THE PENTA PORTS IN 2020 Anssi Lappalainen University of Turku CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES FI–20014 TURUN YLIOPISTO http://mkk.utu.fi TURUN YLIOPISTON MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUKSEN JULKAISUJA PUBLIKATIONER AV SJÖFARTSBRANSCHENS UTBILDNINGS- OCH FORSKNINGSCENTRAL VID ÅBO UNIVERSITET PUBLICATIONS OF THE CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF TURKU A 65 2013 SCENARIO-BASED TRAFFIC FORECASTS FOR ROUTES BETWEEN THE PENTA PORTS IN 2020 Anssi Lappalainen Turku 2013 JULKAISIJA / PUBLISHER: Turun yliopisto / University of Turku MERENKULKUALAN KOULUTUS- JA TUTKIMUSKESKUS CENTRE FOR MARITIME STUDIES Käyntiosoite / Visiting address: ICT-talo, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5 B, 4.krs, Turku Postiosoite / Postal address: FI-20014 TURUN YLIOPISTO Puh. / Tel. +358 (0)2 333 51 http://mkk.utu.fi Painosalama Oy Turku 2013 ISBN 978-951-29-5345-5 (printed) ISBN 978-951-29-5346-2 (pdf) ISSN 1456-1816 FOREWORD Maritime transport across the Baltic Sea is facing many changes. Changes in the Baltic’s economy and demography, rising energy costs, tightening emission standards, political changes as well as in lifestyles and preferences are influencing transport flows and also transport demand and choices regarding transport modes. Effective and competitive port procedures and sea transportation solutions are important for the interconnectivity, growth and sustainability of the regions the ports serve. Since changes in the cargo and passenger flows affect ports directly, it is important that the ports try to anticipate these changes. This report focuses on future expectations regarding liner transport flows between the so-called PENTA ports of Stockholm, Tallinn, Helsinki Turku and Naantali.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life-Cycle of the Barcelona Automobile-Industry Cluster, 1889-20151
    The Life-Cycle of the Barcelona Automobile-Industry Cluster, 1889-20151 • JORDI CATALAN Universitat de Barcelona The life cycle of a cluster: some hypotheses Authors such as G. M. P. Swann and E. Bergman have defended the hy- pothesis that clusters have a life cycle.2 During their early history, clusters ben- efit from positive feedback such as strong local suppliers and customers, a pool of specialized labor, shared infrastructures and information externali- ties. However, as clusters mature, they face growing competition in input mar- kets such as real estate and labor, congestion in the use of infrastructures, and some sclerosis in innovation. These advantages and disadvantages combine to create the long-term cycle. In the automobile industry, this interpretation can explain the rise and decline of clusters such as Detroit in the United States or the West Midlands in Britain.3 The objective of this paper is to analyze the life cycle of the Barcelona au- tomobile- industry cluster from its origins at the end of the nineteenth centu- ry to today. The Barcelona district remained at the top of the Iberian auto- mobile clusters for a century. In 2000, when Spain had reached sixth position 1. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the International Conference of Au- tomotive History (Philadelphia 2012), the 16th World Economic History Congress (Stellen- bosch 2012), and the 3rd Economic History Congress of Latin America (Bariloche 2012). I would like to thank the participants in the former meetings for their comments and sugges- tions. This research benefitted from the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Econo- my (MINECO) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the projects HAR2012-33298 (Cycles and industrial development in the economic history of Spain) and HAR2015-64769-P (Industrial crisis and productive recovery in the Spanish history).
    [Show full text]
  • UPDATE NEW GAME !!! the Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing + Update 1.1.08 Jack Keane 2: the Fire Within Legends of Dawn Pro E
    UPDATE NEW GAME !!! The Incredible Adventures of Van Helsing + Update 1.1.08 Jack Keane 2: The Fire Within Legends of Dawn Pro Evolution Soccer 2013 Patch PESEdit.com 4.1 Endless Space: Disharmony + Update v1.1.1 The Curse of Nordic Cove Magic The Gathering Duels of the Planeswalkers 2014 Leisure Suit Larry: Reloaded Company of Heroes 2 + Update v3.0.0.9704 Incl DLC Thunder Wolves + Update 1 Ride to Hell: Retribution Aeon Command The Sims 3: Island Paradise Deadpool Machines at War 3 Stealth Bastard GRID 2 + Update v1.0.82.8704 Pinball FX2 + Update Build 210613 incl DLC Call of Juarez: Gunslinger + Update v1.03 Worms Revolution + Update 7 incl. Customization Pack DLC Dungeons & Dragons: Chronicles of Mystara Magrunner Dark Pulse MotoGP 2013 The First Templar: Steam Special Edition God Mode + Update 2 DayZ Standalone Pre Alpha Dracula 4: The Shadow of the Dragon Jagged Alliance Collectors Bundle Police Force 2 Shadows on the Vatican: Act 1 -Greed SimCity 2013 + Update 1.5 Hairy Tales Private Infiltrator Rooks Keep Teddy Floppy Ear Kayaking Chompy Chomp Chomp Axe And Fate Rebirth Wyv and Keep Pro Evolution Soccer 2013 Patch PESEdit.com 4.0 Remember Me + Update v1.0.2 Grand Ages: Rome - Gold Edition Don't Starve + Update June 11th Mass Effect 3: Ultimate Collectors Edition APOX Derrick the Deathfin XCOM: Enemy Unknown + Update 4 Hearts of Iron III Collection Serious Sam: Classic The First Encounter Castle Dracula Farm Machines Championships 2013 Paranormal Metro: Last Light + Update 4 Anomaly 2 + Update 1 and 2 Trine 2: Complete Story ZDSimulator
    [Show full text]
  • List of Brands
    Global Consumer 2019 List of Brands Table of Contents 1. Digital music 2 2. Video-on-Demand 4 3. Video game stores 7 4. Digital video games shops 11 5. Video game streaming services 13 6. Book stores 15 7. eBook shops 19 8. Daily newspapers 22 9. Online newspapers 26 10. Magazines & weekly newspapers 30 11. Online magazines 34 12. Smartphones 38 13. Mobile carriers 39 14. Internet providers 42 15. Cable & satellite TV provider 46 16. Refrigerators 49 17. Washing machines 51 18. TVs 53 19. Speakers 55 20. Headphones 57 21. Laptops 59 22. Tablets 61 23. Desktop PC 63 24. Smart home 65 25. Smart speaker 67 26. Wearables 68 27. Fitness and health apps 70 28. Messenger services 73 29. Social networks 75 30. eCommerce 77 31. Search Engines 81 32. Online hotels & accommodation 82 33. Online flight portals 85 34. Airlines 88 35. Online package holiday portals 91 36. Online car rental provider 94 37. Online car sharing 96 38. Online ride sharing 98 39. Grocery stores 100 40. Banks 104 41. Online payment 108 42. Mobile payment 111 43. Liability insurance 114 44. Online dating services 117 45. Online event ticket provider 119 46. Food & restaurant delivery 122 47. Grocery delivery 125 48. Car Makes 129 Statista GmbH Johannes-Brahms-Platz 1 20355 Hamburg Tel. +49 40 2848 41 0 Fax +49 40 2848 41 999 [email protected] www.statista.com Steuernummer: 48/760/00518 Amtsgericht Köln: HRB 87129 Geschäftsführung: Dr. Friedrich Schwandt, Tim Kröger Commerzbank AG IBAN: DE60 2004 0000 0631 5915 00 BIC: COBADEFFXXX Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 258551386 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models
    Evolution of E-Mobility in Carsharing Business Models Susan A. Shaheen1 and Nelson D. Chan2 Transportation Sustainability Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Carsharing continues to grow worldwide as a powerful strategy to provide an alternative to solo driving. The viability of electric vehicles, or EVs, has been examined in various carsharing business models. Moreover, new technologies have given rise to electromobility, or e-mobility, systems. This paper discusses the evolution of e-mobility in carsharing business models and the challenges and opportunities that EVs present to carsharing operators around the world. Operators are now anticipating increased EV proliferation into vehicle fleets over the next 5- 10 years as technology, infrastructure, and public policy shift toward support of e- mobility systems. Thus, research is still needed to quantify impacts of EVs in changing travel behavior toward more sustainable transport. 1 Introduction Carsharing enables a group of members to share a vehicle fleet that is maintained, managed, and insured by a third-party organization. Primarily used for short-term trips, carsharing can provide affordable, self-service vehicle access 24-h per day for those who do not have a car, want to reduce the number of vehicles in their household, or do not use their vehicle during the day for long periods of time. Rates include fuel, insurance, and maintenance. Ideally, carsharing works best in a neighborhood, business, or campus setting where users could walk, bike, share rides, or take public transit to access the shared-use vehicles. Carsharing has evolved through several phases since the first carsharing system began in Europe in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharing and Tourism: the Rise of New Markets in Transport
    SHARING AND TOURISM: THE RISE OF NEW MARKEts IN TRANSPORT Documents de travail GREDEG GREDEG Working Papers Series Christian Longhi Marcello M. Mariani Sylvie Rochhia GREDEG WP No. 2016-01 http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers.html Les opinions exprimées dans la série des Documents de travail GREDEG sont celles des auteurs et ne reflèlent pas nécessairement celles de l’institution. Les documents n’ont pas été soumis à un rapport formel et sont donc inclus dans cette série pour obtenir des commentaires et encourager la discussion. Les droits sur les documents appartiennent aux auteurs. The views expressed in the GREDEG Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the institution. The Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Sharing and Tourism: The Rise of New Markets in Transport Christian Longhi1, Marcello M. Mariani2 and Sylvie Rochhia1 1University Nice Sophia Antipolis, GREDEG, CNRS, 250 rue A. Einstein, 06560 Valbonne France [email protected], [email protected] 2University of Bologna, Via Capo di Lucca, 34 – 40126, Bologna, Italy [email protected] GREDEG Working Paper No. 2016-01 Abstract. This paper analyses the implications of sharing on tourists and tourism focusing on the transportation sector. The shifts from ownership to access, from products to services have induced dramatic changes triggered by the emergence of innovative marketplaces. The services offered by Knowledge Innovative Service Suppliers, start-ups at the origin of innovative marketplaces run through platforms allow the tourists to find solutions to run themselves their activities, bypassing the traditional tourism industry.
    [Show full text]
  • From Legend to Reality
    Hispano Suiza: from legend to reality Hispano Suiza built more than 12.000 luxury cars between 1904 and 1946. Its emblem, the stork, pays tribute to the squadron emblem painted on the side of a Hispano-Suiza powered fighter aircraft that had been flown during World War I Its current hypercars, 100% electric, maintain the values which converted Hispano Suiza into a legend. Barcelona, 2 February 2021. The Hispano Suiza brand renaissance dates back to March 2019 when it unveiled a true work of art on wheels at the Geneva Motor Show: the Carmen. The luxury hypercar, which defines the “hyperlux” segment, instantly became one of the most coveted attractions of the Swiss exhibition. The Carmen shares the same DNA that turned Hispano Suiza into a legend and a source of pride for the Spanish automotive industry. Two generations of Hispano Suiza side by side: the H6 (left) and the Carmen Boulogne. Hispano Suiza was founded on June 14, 1904 by Damián Mateu, with the support of engineer Marc Birkigt, a Swiss who had come to Spain to revolutionise the automobile industry, and who had worked on the two predecessors of Hispano Suiza: La Cuadra and J.Castro. Since the beginning of the century, Birkigt had worked on the development of 10 and 14 hp vehicles, which formed the foundations of the company and were delivered at the end of the same year. 1 A few months later, in 1905, Hispano Suiza produced its first vehicle, the armored type Birkigt system, which was equipped with a four-cylinder engine and delivered 20 CV of power, with a top speed of 87 km/h.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025
    Strategic Scenario Planning for the German Carsharing Industry – 2025 Carolin von Sethe Working Paper Version 1 March 18th, 2016 I Abstract II I Abstract What happens when the Internet of Things1, traditional mobility and the modern consumer coalesce? Nobody knows yet. The increasing uncertainty and complexity that result from the pace of technological progress, blurring boundaries between industry ecosystems and the volatile macroeconomic environment affect future mobility severely. Carsharing is at the forefront of an evolution that points towards a secular shift from individually owned-and-operated automobiles to mobility-on-demand. The purpose of this study is to develop four plausible scenarios for the future of the German carsharing industry in the year 2025 by applying the HHL- Roland Berger scenario development approach and to establish adequate core and optional strategies to aid strategic decision making of managers from companies in the carsharing ecosystem. Key Words: Scenario-based Strategic Planning ∙ Carsharing ∙ Shared Mobility ∙ Strategic Decision Making 1 The Internet of Things (short: IoT) is a term coined for the network of and communication between all devices with enabled Internet connection (Morgan, 2014). II Table of Contents III II Table of Contents I Abstract ............................................................................................................... II II Table of Contents .............................................................................................. III III Table of Figures
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeinde Nestelbach Bei Graz
    Gemeinde Nestelbach bei Graz 3. Änderung des Örtliches Entwicklungskonzeptes VF ÖEK 0.03 „Sachbereichskonzept Energie“ Projekt-Nr. 2020/26 Oktober 2020 Nestelbach bei Graz 3. Änderung des Örtlichen Entwicklungskonzeptes 2 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Verordnungswortlaut ................................................................................................................... 3 § 1 Geltungsbereich ................................................................................................................. 3 § 2 Rechtsgrundlage ................................................................................................................ 3 § 3 Planungsgrundlagen .......................................................................................................... 3 § 4 Änderung im Verordnungswortlaut ................................................................................... 3 § 5 Rechtskraft ......................................................................................................................... 5 2. Erläuterungsbericht ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Planungsbereich ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Wesentliche geänderte Planungsvoraussetzungen ........................................................... 6 2.3. Öffentliches Interesse .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Verordnung Der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung Vom 10
    1 von 3 Jahrgang 2014 Ausgegeben am 10. September 2014 99. Verordnung: Änderung der Steiermärkischen Bezirkshauptmannschaftenverordnung elektronischen Signatur bzw. der Echtheit de Das elektronische Original dieses Dokumentes wurde amtssigniert. Hinweise zur Prüfung dieser 99. Verordnung der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung vom 10. Juli 2014, mit der die Steiermärkische Bezirkshauptmannschaftenverordnung geändert wird Auf Grund des § 8 Abs. 5 lit. d des Übergangsgesetzes vom 1. Oktober 1920, BGBl. Nr. 368/1925, zuletzt in der Fassung des Bundesverfassungsgesetzes BGBl. I Nr. 2/2008 wird mit Zustimmung der Bundesregierung verordnet: Die Steiermärkische Bezirkshauptmannschaftenverordnung, LGBl. Nr. 99/2012, wird geändert wie folgt: 1. § 2 lautet: s Ausdrucks finden Sie unter: „§ 2 Sprengel der politischen Bezirke Die Sprengel der in § 1 genannten politischen Bezirke umfassen folgende Gemeinden: Bezirk Gemeinden Bruck-Mürzzuschlag Aflenz, Turnau, Breitenau am Hochlantsch, Bruck an der Mur, Kapfenberg, Pernegg an der Mur, Sankt Lorenzen im Mürztal, https://as.stmk.gv.at Sankt Marein im Mürztal, Tragöß-Sankt Katharein, Mariazell, Thörl, Kindberg, Stanz im Mürztal, Krieglach, Sankt Barbara im Mürztal, Mürzzuschlag, Langenwang, Spital am Semmering, Neuberg an der Mürz Deutschlandsberg Deutschlandsberg, Frauental an der Laßnitz, Eibiswald, Groß Sankt Florian, Lannach, Pölfing-Brunn, Preding, Sankt Josef (Weststeiermark), Sankt Martin im Sulmtal, Sankt Peter im Sulmtal, Sankt Stefan ob Stainz, Schwanberg, Stainz, Wettmannstätten, Wies Graz-Umgebung
    [Show full text]
  • VR Group Annual Report 2002
    Contact Information Highlights of 2002 VR-Group Ltd • The Pendolino service was extended to Oulu and Kuopio. P.O. Box 488 • Timetabling for passenger services was restructured and (Vilhonkatu 13) travel times shortened. FIN-00101 Helsinki • Container traffi c to East Asia and combined road-rail Tel. +358 307 10 transport in Finland both grew in volume. Annual Report 2002 Report Annual Fax +358 307 21 700 • Transport of heavy freight with 25-tonne axle loads started www.vr.fi between Kirkniemi and the Port of Hanko. • Some 300 men and VR-Track’s key machinery worked on VR Ltd renovation of the Savo line, the company’s largest worksite P.O. Box 488 Annual Report 2002 in 2002. (Vilhonkatu 13) FIN-00101 Helsinki • Transpoint expanded its range of general cargo services. Tel. +358 307 10 • Helsinki railway station’s restaurant was refurbished Fax +358 307 22 330 capturing the essence of architect Eliel Saarinen. www.vr.fi VR-Track Ltd P.O. Box 488 (Vilhonkatu 13) Financial information in 2003 FIN-00101 Helsinki Tel. +358 307 10 • The Annual Report is published in Finnish, Swedish, Fax +358 307 21 051 English and Russian. www.vr.fi • Interim Reports will be published in June and October. • Interim Reports are published in Finnish, Swedish and Oy Pohjolan Liikenne Ab English. Postintaival 3 • The Annual Report and Interim Reports can be down- FIN-00240 Helsinki loaded from the Internet at www.vr.fi , under VR Group. Tel. +358 307 15 Fax +358 307 23 760 • Printed copies can be ordered by contacting VR-Group www.pohjolanliikenne.fi Ltd’s Corporate Communications, tel.
    [Show full text]