DOCSLIB.ORG

OF DMRC, on the PROPOSED PUNE METRO RAIL PROJECT by V K J Rane – IRSE (Retd.) Ex-MD/IRCON

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OF DMRC, on the PROPOSED PUNE METRO RAIL PROJECT by V K J Rane – IRSE (Retd.) Ex-MD/IRCON 1 CRITICAL COMMENTS ON THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND THE DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) (DATED 12 TH MARCH 2009) OF DMRC, ON THE PROPOSED PUNE METRO RAIL PROJECT BG -5’6” SG -4’8.5” Coach Width 3.66m Coach Width 2.9m BY V.K.J.RANE - IRSE (Retd.) Ex-MD/IRCON Core Group Member –Metro Rail PUNE 28 th April 2009 2 INDEX 1) MAP OF PUNE SHOWING THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT 2) CRITICAL COMMENTS ON THE FORWARD OF DPR 3) CRITICAL COMMENTS ON THE SALIENT FEATURES OF DPR 4) CRITICAL COMMENTS ON THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & DPR 5) ANNEXURE A) SALIENT FEATURES B) COMPARATIVE COST OF CORRIDORS I & II FOR BG & REVISED SG & DPR ESTIMATE ON SG C) GUIDELINES OF MoUD FOR DPR PREPARATION 3 PROPOSED METRO RAIL FOR PUNE Prepared by V K J Rane based on the DPR 4 Date 28 th April 2009 CRITICAL COMMENTS ON THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND THE DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) (DATED 12 TH MARCH 2009) OF DMRC, ON THE PROPOSED PUNE METRO RAIL PROJECT By V K J Rane – IRSE (Retd.) Ex-MD/IRCON INTRODUCTION--The project report dated 12.03.09 (DPR) received by PMC from DMRC, comprise of a Foreword, Salient Features of the Project, Executive Summary and 15 Chapters of the DPR, including A4 size plans without dimensions. Detailed drawings incorporating Index Plan and Section, layout of Depot, layout of Stations Bridges, Alignment with locations of columns and other details, in A2 size drawings, as prepared for Mumbai Metro and Hyd Metro, have not been received. Hence a detailed technical appreciation could not be made . No reference has been made to the meaning of the Short Forms used at a large number of places. This should have been done at the beginning of the chapter 1 as these reports will be read and seen not only by experts within the country but also those at international levels. Generally all professional reports do cover such clarifications. 1) Comments on Foreword – 1.1 Terms of Reference of PMC - Foreword does not indicate, any reference in DPR to the terms of reference given by PMC to DMRC for undertaking the preparation of DPR of the project. Though the foreword has been signed by MD / DMRC, he, nor his deputy, seem to have even glanced through the attached report before submission to PMC, as seen from the obvious inconsistencies, deficiencies, omissions, deletions of references to Ludhiana and Faridabad during copy pasting, and the general substandard quality of contents and presentation. This report is to be presented to the State cabinet for approval and sanctions and will be read by International experts & consultants. 1.2 Alternative Studies - The Foreword does not make any reference to DPR regarding alternative studies of BG, with indigenous wider coaches or MG (LRT) with the indigenous technology, available within the country. The State Cabinet, before taking techno-economic decisions on this project, would have been, in a better position, to convince the citizens, the techno-economic merits of the project and safeguarding the public interest, for its implementation. The report is biased in favour of SG with imported coaches and adoption of technology not required for the performance stipulated in the report. Our detailed para wise comments on the justification for adopting SG with imported coaches, at exorbitant cost as given at para 4.3 of chapter 4 of the DPR, are given in our comments under that chapter. 2) COMMENTS ON SALIENT FEATURES & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY- 2.1 Details of the salient features - of this project as furnished in the DPR by DMRC are attached as annexure 1 to this report, for ready reference. It is seen from this annexure that the total length of these two corridors is 31.515 km with Corridor 1--PCMC to Swargate is 16.589 km and Corridor 2 -- Vanaz to Ramvadi all elevated (14.925 kms). Corridor 1 is underground for a length of 5.019 kms with 6 UG stations, & balance 9 stations of Corridor 1 and 15 stations in corridor 2 are all elevated. 2.2 Track Connectivity - The salient features do not make a mention, that there is NO track connectivity between the two corridors and that the Corridor 2 crosses Corridor 1 over its UG section, at ASI station, necessitating physical interchange by commuters from 12.5 m above the ground level to about 22m below the ground level. The salient features also do not indicate the number and locations of the river crossings, the under river crossing alignment for Mutha river and that the railway track crosses a number of lines across the middle of station yard. These are important features deciding the technical feasibility, the period of construction and the cost of the project and therefore should have been brought out in this para. 5 2.3 Traffic forecast up to 2031 - It is seen from salient features that the traffic forecast has been assessed for the two corridors for two decades only up to the period 2031, the project has been planned to be commissioned in the year 2014, so the assessment has been done only for a period of 17 yrs after commissioning. This assessment should have been done for a period of at least 50 yrs or a minimum of 30 yrs that is up to 2045. This would have covered the life cycle period of the rolling stock. 2.4 Contradictions in number of coaches - There is a contradiction in the figures given in the tables presented at Table 0.5 at page 15/36 under para 0.6 –TRAIN OPERATION PLAN of the Executive summary and at table 5 TRAIN OPERATION at page 2/4 of the Salient features. The number of coaches as per table 5 at salient features for Corridor –I for the year 2031 work out to 25 x 4 = 100, as against 88 mentioned for the same year in table 0.5 of the executive summary. Similar mistakes are seen for the year 2011. Similarly for Corridor 2 the number of coaches required for the year 2011 should be 40 (10x4) instead of 28 and for the year 2021 it should be 48 (12x4) instead of 40, and for the year 2031 it should be 80 (20x4) instead of 40. It is not clear on what basis the cost has been assessed for the Rolling Stock in the project estimates. There are many such contradictions and mistakes and the report need to be sent back to DMRC for corrections. 2.5 PERMANENT WAY—Justification given for adoption of SG for Metro systems in Pune is neither convincing nor logical particularly in the context of capacity requirements, compatibility, connectivity and existing standards in the country including economy. Para wise comments on this justification have been included in the appropriate chapter of our comments on the DPR. It is necessary to adopt the Track Structure for the Metro System, so as to provide connectivity with the existing BG system in Pune Rly Division to enable commuters to travel without interchange from Lonavala to Hadapsar and back. SG Structure proposed involves importation of rails and Turn outs. 2.6 SYSTEM TRACTION—Techno-economic justification for adoption of a costly 25 KV AC overhead traction verses 750V DC system for such a low level of traffic has not been given in the report. Adoption of a 3-phase AC induction motors for the drive is NO reason to opt 25 KV AC supply Single Phase as the power has to be obtained through an inverter worked from a DC supply. Features of Disc Brakes or Air Springs adopted are not required for slow speed trains on Metro as these are required and are of advantage for high speed trains. Telecommunication and Fare collection systems proposed can also be provided on BG systems and are locally available 2.7 ROLLING STOCK – It is seen from this chapter that the width of the imported rolling stock has been limited to 2.9m wide only, as against 3.2m wide for Delhi, Mumbai , Hyd, Bangalore and other metros in the country. The axle load has also been limited to 16T as against 17 tons for other metros. This affects advantages of economies of standardization. There is NO provision for future adoption of wider Rolling Stock (Coaches) and increasing the capacity for future conversion to BG, to accommodate additional future traffic demand requirements beyond 25 yrs. This restricts the capacity permanently This should be known to the citizens and must be mentioned in the salient features so that the Cabinet members, are aware of the type of metro they would be approving, even though, it is against the benefits of future citizens . The justification for selection of the SG rolling stock at para f at page 7/36 of the executive summary is factually not correct and has not been proved with facts and figures and not compared with indigenous rolling stock. 2.8 DEPOT – (MAINTENANCE FACILITIES) & ASI STATION -- The salient features must indicate, for the benefit of the knowledge of the cabinet Ministers, that there is NO rail connectivity between the two Corridors and hence between the two depots. And that certain maintenance facilities required for Corridor 2 have been made provision of, at Corridor 1 Depot, and carried out by transferring these coaches in dismantled conditions, in trailers by road. Similarly the need for physical interchange of passengers at ASI stations from elevated to UG and vice versa, for a level difference of 35m, and a costly station at ASI, due to non-connectivity of the two corridors, must be mentioned in the salient features itself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RITES Limited Corporate Presentation July 2019 Disclaimer
    RITES Limited Corporate Presentation July 2019 Disclaimer THIS PRESENTATION (“PRESENTATION”) DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR FORM PART OF ANY OFFER OR INVITATION OR INDUCEMENT TO SELL OR ISSUE, OR ANY SOLICITATION OF ANY OFFER TO PURCHASE OR SUBSCRIBE FOR, ANY SECURITIES OF RITES LIMITED (THE “COMPANY”), NOR SHALL IT OR ANY PART OF IT OR THE FACT OF ITS DISTRIBUTION FORM THE BASIS OF, OR BE RELIED ON IN CONNECTION WITH, ANY CONTRACT OR COMMITMENT THEREFOR. The material that follows is a Presentation of general background information about the Company’s activities, without regards to specific objectives, suitability, financial situations and needs of any particular person. It is information given in summary form and does not purport to be complete. This Presentation does not constitute a prospectus, offering circular or offering memorandum or an offer, or a solicitation of any offer, to purchase or sell, any shares and should not be considered as a recommendation that any investor should subscribe for or purchase any of the Company’s equity shares. No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representation not contained in or inconsistent with this presentation and if given or made, such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by any person. This Presentation includes statements that are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements”. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, including the terms “believes”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “predicts”, “aims”, “foresees”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “may”, “will”, “seeks” or “should” or, in each case, their negative or other variations or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, plans, aims, objectives, goals, future events or intentions.
    [Show full text]
  • 27Th ATR on Twenty Fourth Report
    STANDING COMMITTEE ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT 27 (2013-2014) FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEMANDS FOR GRANTS (2013-2014) (Action Taken by the Government on the Recommendations contained in the Twenty Fourth Report (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) of the Standing Committee on Urban Development on Demands for Grants (2013-2014) ) of the Ministry of Urban Development) TWENTY SEVENTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI February,2014/Magha,1935 (Saka) TWENTY SEVENTH REPORT STANDING COMMITTEE ON URBAN DEVELOPMENT (2013-2014) (FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEMANDS FOR GRANTS [Action Taken by the Government on the Recommendations contained in the Twenty Fourth Report (Fifteenth Lok Sabha) of the Standing Committee on Urban Development on Demands for Grants (2013-2014) of the Ministry of Urban Development] Presented to Lok Sabha on 17.02.2014 Laid in Rajya Sabha on 13.02.2014 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI February,2014/Magha,1935 (Saka) 2 C.U.D No. 81 Price: Rs. …. (C) 2014 BY LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (Thirteenth Edition) and printed by the Indian Press, Delhi-110033. 3 CONTENTS PAGE COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE .....................……….……................…... (ii) INTRODUCTION .........................................…………………………..……………. (iv) REPORT CHAPTER I 1 CHAPTER II 19 Observations/Recommendations which have been accepted by the Government CHAPTER III Observations /Recommendations which the 71 Committee do not desire to pursue in view of the Government’s replies CHAPTER IV 72 Observations/Recommendations in respect of which replies of the Government have not been accepted by the Committee and require reiteration CHAPTER V Observations /Recommendations in respect of 83 which final replies of the Government are still awaited ANNEXURES I.
    [Show full text]
  • J Kumar Infraprojects Ltd
    J Kumar Infraprojects Ltd. J Kumar Infra projects Ltd. (JKIL) is a Mumbai based infrastructure developer with a successful track record of completing marquee projects spread across the transportation, civil infra, irrigation and piling verticals. It has largely operated in the Northern-Western belt viz. Maharashtra, Delhi, Gujarat, Rajasthan and UP. As of June 2016 end, its order book stood at Rs 8,646 crore, 6.1x FY16 revenues. Of the total order book, the company has Rs 5,368 crore worth of Mumbai Metro orders bagged in July, 2016. We met with the management of JKIL, which recently was in news for its JV being barred by the BMC on account of suspected irregularities in the repair work undertaken by the sub- contractor of the JV on a particular stretch of road in the Bandra- Dahisar route. Investors turned jittery on speculation that the MMRDA may also backlist the company leading to withdrawal of the Metro order, which the company had recently won. Consequently, the stock slumped from Rs 222 in July 2016 making a low of Rs 106 in August 2016. However, in September 2016, the MMRDA received a green signal from the Advocate General (AG) to appoint contractors blacklisted by BMC since a single authority alone cannot completely de- bar a contractor from all infrastructure related activities. With the over-hang of the blacklisting out of sight, the stock recovered to Rs. 228 by October, 2016. We believe there is a further upside to the stock given its robust order book, high revenue visibility, consistent EBITDA margins in the range of 15-16% and debt-equity below 1x despite the execution of a lumpy order book.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer ID Branch Name 33676 Kochi a Allas 34010 Madurai A
    Customer ID Branch Name 33676 Kochi A Allas 34010 Madurai A Sathiah 34884 Mangaluru A c subbegowda 921984 Kochi A J Paily 40359 Coimbatore A m srimuthu Vatchala 930975 Noida A N Buildwell Private Limited 1350646 Madurai A V Sreedharan 33884 Indore Aalok Garg 884459 Pune Aban H Bhandari 598025 Jaipur-Vaishali Abdul Ajij 877477 Kochi Abdul Fazal 880079 Kottayam Abdul Latheef 33596 Mumbai Metro Abdul A A 1279797 Fort Abdul Gani Hajiusman Mundia 527821 Akola Abdul Makin Rabbani Deshmukh 33715 Trivandrum Abdul Rasheed M 1052113 Fort Abdul Sattar Haji Usman Mundia 33509 Mumbai Metro Abhay Madhav Jategaonkar 712156 Jaipur-Vaishali Abhay Singh Shekhawat 755221 Durgapur Abhijit Sarkar 59920 Indore Abraham T m 34455 Hyderabad Adiseshu Kotari 9008702 Mangaluru Adithya D 33587 Mumbai Metro Agarwal J D 33514 Mumbai Metro Ahuja S K 1008032 Ghaziabad Ajay Jain 884189 Bhopal Ajay Sharma 518595 Jaipur-Vaishali Ajay Bahadur Agnihotri 1263354 Mumbai Metro Ajay Motilal Paswan 878707 Kochi Ajisha M 1020955 Thane Ajit Harichandra Rupanwar 33833 Hubballi Ajitkumar Patil 1038513 Durgapur Ajoy Aich 969951 Varanasi Akhilesh Singh 981540 Mumbai Metro Akshata Sandeep Chonkar 876045 Akola Akshay R Mahhalle 33755 Mumbai Metro Alexander P M 1577540 Rajkot Alka B Shah 1264581 Vadodara Alkaben C Suthar 33797 Mumbai Metro Alok Kumar 946731 Durgapur Aloka Nanda Bhyas 895096 Kolkata Aloke Guha 877935 Kochi Amal Raj R 37999 Mumbai Metro Ambarish Krishna Nagarsekar 548180 Solapur Ambika Naganath Kurapati 548162 Solapur Ambika Narendra Jatla 548213 Solapur Ambubai Ambadas Kajle
    [Show full text]
  • Dhfl Uncontactable Public Depo
    Dewan Housing Finance Limited Pending Form CAs Important Notice for the Public Depositors with missing contact details For the FD holders having the Cust IDs listed below, it is requested to provide your e-mail id and contact number to complete the basic data in company records. The FD holders shall visit the nearest DHFL branch with below mentioned documents to update the contact details: 1. Self attested PAN card copy. 2. Duly signed form for contact details updating. The form is will be available at the DHFL branch offices Please note, it is important to file the Form CA and update your contact details as the earliest so that you aware of the development in the CIRP activities and can participate in the eVoting actives post every CoC. *We have tried contacting the below mentioned Public Depositors through the communication details available in the company records Customer ID Branch Customer Name 1558499 Chennai A Dhanasekar 1331296 Chennai A Kuppusamy 919868 Salem A Mohan 34010 Madurai A Sathiah 34884 Mangaluru A c subbegowda 10003986 Chennai A DEVA STELLA ANANTHI 10081442 Surat A K Diam 9004752 Rpu Dahisar A K ROY KARMAKAR 10111531 Trichy A Kavitha 1513463 Hyderabad A N Chidamber 10109799 Chennai A P Sanmugham 10108795 Trichy A Sakthivel 10024905 Gurgaon A U INCORP 1350646 Madurai A V Sreedharan 33884 Indore Aalok Garg 10087874 Thane Aarati Malhotra 10085709 Noida Aarti Khanna 1464682 Chennai Aarti Manoharlal Bijlani 10097692 Gurgaon Aayushi Saini 884459 Pune Aban H Bhandari 10108314 Surat Abbaskha Ismailkha Pathan 598025 Jaipur-Vaishali
    [Show full text]
  • MODERN TRAMS (LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT) for Cities in India 1 | Melbourne Early Trolley Car in Newton, Massachusetts
    MODERN TRAMS (LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT) For Cities in India Institute of Urban Transport (india) www.iutindia.org September, 2013 Title : Modern Trams (Light Rail Transit)-For Cities in India Year : September 2013 Copyright : No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form by photo, photoprint, microfilm or any other means without the written permission of FICCI and Institute of Urban Transport (India). Disclaimer : "The information contained and the opinions expressed are with best intentions and without any liability" I N D E X S.No. SUBJECT Page No. 1. What is a Tramway (Light rail transit) . 1 2. Historical background . 1 3. Worldwide usage. 3 4. Trams vsLRT . 3 5. Features of LRT . 4 6. Comparison with Metro rail . 4 7. Comparison with Bus. 5 8. Comparison with BRT (Bus-way) . 6 9. Issues in LRT. 8 10. A case for LRT . 8 11. Integrated LRT and bus network . 9 12. Relevance of LRT for India . 10 13. Kolkata tram . 10 14. Growth of Kolkata tram . 11 15. Kolkata tram after 1992. 12 16. Learning from Kolkata tram . 13 17. Present mass rapid transit services in India . 14 18. Need for a medium capacity mass rapid transit mode in India. 15 19. Planning and design of LRT . 16 20. Aesthetics and Technology . 17 21. Capex, Opex and Life cycle cost of alternative modes of MRT . 18 22. Evolution of LRT model abroad . 20 23. LRT model for India . 21 24. Road Junctions & Signalling Arrangements . 22 25. System design . 22 26. Financing . 23 27. Project Development Process . 23 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapport CODATU
    Urban transport in India A developing network A state of the art of transport in Indian cities Report by CODATU Marion Hoyez August 2014 1 Mathieu Martin Contents ACRONYMS................................................................................................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................................................5 1 GENERAL CONTEXT...........................................................................................................................................................6 1.1 India at glance.................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 A complex distribution of urban transport governance...................................................................................................6 1.2.1 Central level.............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 State level................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 City Level...................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Metro Station Or Subway Station Is a Railway Station for a Rapid Transit System, Often Known by Names Such As "Metro", "Underground" and "Subway"
    A metro station or subway station is a railway station for a rapid transit system, often known by names such as "metro", "underground" and "subway". Some metro systems, such as those of Montreal, Stockholm, Prague and Moscow, are famous for the beautiful architecture and public art. The Paris Métro is famous for its art nouveau station entrances; while the Athens Metro is known for its display of archeological relics , Sir Norman Foster's new system in Bilbao, Spain uses the same modern architecture at every station to make navigation easier for the passenger, though some may argue that this is at the expense of character. In some stations, especially where trains are fully automated, the entire platform is screened from the track by a wall, typically of glass, with automatic platform-edge doors (PEDs). These open, like elevator doors, only when a train is stopped, and thus eliminate the hazard that a passenger will accidentally fall (or deliberately jump) onto the tracks and be run over or electrocuted. The largest metro station in the world is the Paris Métro-RER station Châtelet-Les Halles in France[1]. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Locale National Capital Region, India Transit type Rapid transit Number of 6 lines [1][2] Number of 132 stations Daily 1.5 million[3][4] ridership Chief E. Sreedharan executive Headquarters Metro Bhawan, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi Website www.delhimetrorail.com Operation Began December 24, 2002[5] operation Operator(s) Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd (DMRC) Number of 188 trains[6] vehicles Train length 4/6 coaches[7][6] Technical System length 156 kilometers (97 mi)[1][2] Track gauge 1,676 mm (5 ft 6 in) broad gauge and 1,435 1 mm (4 ft 8 ⁄2 in) standard gauge Electrification 25 kV, 50 Hz AC through overhead catenary The Delhi Metro (Hindi: दि쥍ली मेट्रो Dillī Meṭro) is a rapid transit system serving Delhi, Gurgaon and Noida in the National Capital Region of India.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro-6 (Swami Samarth Nagar-Vikhroli); Rs
    URBAN MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL AND INDIAN ACTIVITIES METRO NEWSLETTERS 79 - 87; September 2019 gathered by Dr. F. A. Wingler METRO NEWSLETTERS on “URBAN MOBILITY AS A SERVICE” PUBLIC MULTIMODAL URBAN, SUBURBAN AND INTERURBAN PASSENGER TRANSIT SYSTEMS WITH METRO-BUS, LIGHT-RAIL, TRAM-TRAIN, METRO-RAIL, METRO-TRAIN, REGIONAL RAPID TRANSIT, COMMUTER-RAIL, ROPE-WAY/TRAIN, MAGLEV AND HOVERCRAFT TRANSIT/PEOPLE MOVER, WATER-METRO, AUTONOMOUS PEOPLE-MOVER TRANSPORTATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS IN MODERN URBAN/MEGAPOLIS ENVIROMENT METRO Newsletter by Dr. F.A. Wingler METRO 77, July 2019 Digitalised Rail World 1 PART I: INDIAN ACTIVITIES AND INITIATIVES FOR URBAN MOBILITY AS A SERVICE Exclusive Interview with Mr. Thiruman Archunan, Director – Projects, Kochi Metro Rail Limited, on Progress of Kochi Metro; India June 28, 2019 Interviews Mr. Thiruman Archunan, Director – Projects, Kochi Metro Rail Limited, is in charge of all Civil works related to KMRL (Kochin Metro Rail Limited): Construction of metro stations, viaduct, track, depot, and others works related to Roads, improvements to city landscape, Place making and other NMT (Non-Motorised Transport) related works, modernised ferry services etc“. Rail Analysis: What is the current Progress of Kochi Metro? Mr. Thiruman Archunan: The approved Phase-I of Kochi Mero Rail is from Aluva to Petta is 25.16 km with 22 stations. The stretch from Aluva to Palarivattom with 13.26 km is operational from June 2017 and up to Maharajas with total 18.22 km is operational from October 2017. 2 Balance stretch of 6.94 km from Maharajas College to Petta is passing through the Central Business District (CBD) of Kochi City touching the major Railway Station Ernakulam South and Vytila, the busiest junction of Ernakulum, Kerala.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Indo-Pacific Resource Guide
    This report was funded by the U.S. Trade and Development Agency (USTDA), an agency of the U.S. Government. The opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this document are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of USTDA. USTDA makes no representation about, nor does it accept responsibility for, the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this report. i The U.S. Trade and Development Agency helps companies create U.S. jobs through the export of U.S. goods and services for priority development projects in emerging economies. USTDA links U.S. businesses to export opportunities by funding project planning activities, pilot projects, and reverse trade missions while creating sustainable infrastructure and economic growth in partner countries. ii Contents List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................................... v 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 2 INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY ....................................... 12 New Indonesian Capital – Smart City Development ................................................................ 22 National Digital Infrastructure Plan – JENDELA 4G & 5G ..................................................... 27 Negeri Sembilan MVV 2.0 High Tech Park Development ....................................................... 33 Advanced Metering
    [Show full text]
  • Cbs Sol Id Alpha Code Zone Name Region Name Bank
    CBS_SOL ID ALPHA CODE ZONE NAME REGION NAME BANK NAME BRANCH NAME AREA DATE OF O STATE DISTRICT SUBDISTRICT_NAME CENTER_NAME ADDRESS 2774 PBBAHM AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA AHMEDABAD GEN METRO 36775 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) NEHRU NAGAR SURENDRA MANGALDAS ROAD NEHRU NAGAR, , , AMBAWADI, 380015 GF, MILLENIUM PLAZA AKHABARNAGAR CIRCILE GF, MILLENIUM PLAZA AKHABARNAGAR, , , 5543 AKHABA AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA AKHABARNAGAR METRO 42089 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) NAVA WADAJ, 380013 PANCHVATI MARG,AMBAWADI,AHMEDABAD‐6 PANCHVATI MARG,AMBAWADI,AHMEDABAD‐6, , , , 0320 AMBAWA AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA AMBAWADI METRO 23347 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) 380006 2939 VEJALP AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA ANANDNAGAR METRO 38225 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) ANAND NAGAR, 100 FT.ROAD, VEJALPUR ANAND NAGAR, 100 FT.ROAD, VEJALPUR, , , , 380051 ASHRAM ROAD,OPP.NATRAJ CINEMA,AHMEDABAD‐380009 ASHRAM ROAD,OPP.NATRAJ 0849 ASHRAM AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA ASHRAM ROAD METRO 27757 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) CINEMA,AHMEDABAD‐380009, , , , 380009 IST FLOOR, RUDRA SQUARE BODAKDEV CROSS ROAD IST FLOOR, RUDRA SQUARE BODAKDEV, 4221 BODAKD AHMEDABAD ZONE AHMEDABAD ‐ I REGION BANK OF BARODA BODAKDEV METRO 41179 GUJARAT AHMEDABAD AHMEDABAD CITY AHMADABAD (M CORP.) AHMEDABAD, , , BODAKDEV, AHMEDABAD, 380015 2953 CHANDK AHMEDABAD ZONE
    [Show full text]
  • How Smart Are Our Cities?
    Content list Foreword p3/About the assessment p4/Assessment summary p8/ Detailed city assessments p9/ Conclusion p153/ About The Express Group p156 How smart are our cities? www.pwc.in Foreword The Indian Government has truly stepped on the accelerator with respect to smart cities by announcing an initiative to convert 100 cities to smart cities by 2018. This is imperative because cities are already bursting at the seams, and India’s growth of population has to be accompanied by a commensurate growth in urban infrastructure. While numerous state governments have announced their smart city plans, the approach to become a ‘smart city’ has been different. Some cities have been extremely successful and are rated extremely well in many social, economic and urban components, while some have been found wanting. If India has to truly derive the full potential of the idea of ‘smart cities’, it is crucial to do a comprehensive assessment WRUHYHDODFOHDUVLWXDWLRQRIWKHFXUUHQWVWDWHRIWKHLGHQWLğHGVPDUWFLWLHVZLWKUHVSHFWWRGHğQHGSDUDPHWHUV&LWLHV can look at their current state, and benchmark themselves against the best ranked cities. It is in this context, that Express Computer, one of India’s most respected IT publications with a focus on HJRYHUQDQFHDQGHQWHUSULVHWHFKQRORJ\KDVSDUWQHUHGZLWK3Z&DUHVSHFWHGDQDO\VWğUPZLWKKXJHGRPDLQ expertise in smart cities, to launch the second edition of the report, ‘Assessment of Indian Cities for Smart City Transformation’. In this year’s report, performance based assessment has been conducted for 20 major Indian cities in terms of the operational effectiveness of the urban services being delivered to its citizens. More importantly, the report assesses the effectiveness of the strategies of 10 cities in a period one year, which gives an indication of the approach for other cities to emulate.
    [Show full text]