DOCSLIB.ORG

LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - BELGIUM LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Belgium Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/05 Date of Edition 25/06/19 LSSIP Focal Point Antoine Vincent [email protected] Federal Public Service Mobility and Transport LSSIP Contact Person Valerie Oblin - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2019 implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2019 implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP https://ops.skeyes.be/html/belgocontrol_static/eaip/eAIP_Main/html /index-en-GB.html FAB Performance Plan http://www.fabec.eu/fabec_homepage/en/Performance/Performanc e%20Plan/ LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019. No signature received from skeyes for the 2019 Belgium LSSIP document LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 6 1. National ATM Environment ............................................................ 7 Geographical Scope ............................................................................................ 7 National Stakeholders ...................................................................................... 11 2. Traffic and Capacity ...................................................................... 20 Evolution of traffic in Belgium .......................................................................... 20 ACC Brussels ..................................................................................................... 21 3. Implementation Projects .............................................................. 25 National projects .............................................................................................. 25 FAB projects ...................................................................................................... 26 Multinational projects ...................................................................................... 31 U-Space demonstration projects ...................................................................... 32 4. Cooperation activities ................................................................... 35 FAB Co-ordination............................................................................................. 35 Multinational cooperation initiatives ............................................................... 35 5. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................ 37 State View: Overall Objective Implementation Progress ................................. 37 Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature ...................................................... 38 ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress .............................................................. 42 Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................. 43 6. Annexes ........................................................................................ 79 A. Specialists involved in the ATM implementation reporting for Belgium ......... 79 B. National stakeholders organisation charts ....................................................... 80 C. Implementation Objectives’ links with SESAR KF, ASBU blocks and more ...... 84 D. Implementation of U-Space Services ............................................................... 89 E. SESAR Solutions implemented in a voluntary way ........................................... 97 F. Military Organisations Infrastructure ............................................................. 104 G. Glossary of abbreviations ............................................................................... 105 LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium- Level 1 Released Issue Executive Summary National ATM Context Member State of: The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Belgium are the following: - The Federal Public Service (FPS) Mobility and Transport, through the Belgian Civil Aviation Authority (BCAA) - skeyes - MUAC - The Ministry of Defence (MoD), through the Air Component - Brussels Airport Company. Main airport covered by LSSIP: EBBR (Brussels Airport) Traffic and Capacity Summer Forecast (May to October inclusive) 0.1% & 2.7% -1.5% 2019 20192020 -2024 Minute, per ACC 0.27 1.20 2018 2019 LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium - Level 1 1 Released Issue Belgium is part of: The Functional Airspace Block Europe Central Number of national projects: 2 projects ongoing Number of FAB projects: 2 projects ongoing U-Space demonstration projects: 8 projects ongoing Summary of 2019 developments: Year 2019 included the realization of two major ATM projects on 2 December: - the move of the military ATC centre of Semmerzake to the civil ACC operational room in CANAC, allowing a colocalization of both units; - the simultaneous replacement of the military ATM system by a remote system (Shared ATS System, SAS2) based on MUAC ATM System, and hosted by Maastricht. Both changes required years of equipment, infrastructure and personnel preparations. Progress per SESAR Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the SESAR baseline (Pre-SESAR and SESAR1 non-PCP) and the PCP elements. It shows the average implementation progress for all objectives grouped by SESAR Phases, excluding those for which the State is outside the applicability area as defined on a yearly basis in the European ATM Master Plan (Level 3) 2019, i.e. disregarding the declared “NOT APPLICABLE”LSSIP progress status. The SESAR 1 (non-PCP) progress in the graphics below for this State is based on the following objectives: AOP14, AOP15, AOP16, ATC02.9, ATC20, NAV12 and COM11.2. Pre-SESAR Phase 2000 2030 76% SESAR 1 (PCP only) 2011 2024 33% SESAR 1 (non-PCP) 2013 2030 14% LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium - Level 1 2 Released Issue Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the SESAR baseline and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph. ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs Blocks 0. The overall percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is a summary of the table explained in Chapter 5.3 – ICAO ASBU Implementation Progress. Block 0 2000 2024 77% LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium - Level 1 3 Released Issue ATM Deployment Outlook State Objectives Deployed in 2018 - 2019 None By 2020 By 2021 By 2022 By 2023+ - Implementation of ground- - ASM Management of Real- - RNAV 1 in TMA Operations ground automated co- Time Airspace Data NAV03.1 - 79 % progress ordination processes AOM19.2 - 56 % progress - Electronic Dialogue as ITY-COTR - 73 % progress - ASM Support Tools to Automated Assistance to - New Pan-European Support Advanced FUA Controller during Network Service (NewPENS) (AFUA) Coordination and Transfer COM12 - 47 % progress AOM19.1 - 90 % progress ATC17 - 24 % progress - 8,33 kHz Air-Ground Voice - Short Term ATFCM - Collaborative Flight Channel Spacing below FL195 Measures (STAM) - Phase 2 Planning ITY-AGVCS2 - 81 % progress FCM04.2 - 30 % progress FCM03 - 45 % progress - Surveillance Performance - Interactive Rolling NOP - Information Exchanges and Interoperability FCM05 - 36 % progress using the SWIM Yellow TI ITY-SPI - 89 % progress - Management of Pre- Profile - Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM defined Airspace INF08.1 - 00 % progress Process and ASM Configurations - Information Exchange with Information Sharing AOM19.4 - 55 % progress En-route in Support of AMAN AOM19.3 - 53 % progress ATC15.1 - 00 % progress - Traffic Complexity - Extended Flight Plan Assessment FCM08 - 00 % progress FCM06 - 30 % progress - Voice over Internet - Harmonise Operational Air Protocol (VoIP) in En-Route Traffic (OAT) and General Air COM11.1 - 36 % progress Traffic (GAT) Handling - Voice over Internet AOM13.1 - 90 % progress Protocol (VoIP) in - Electronic Terrain and Airport/Terminal Obstacle Data (eTOD) COM11.2 - 00 % progress INF07 - 38 % progress - Aircraft Identification ITY-ACID - 80 % progress - RNP Approach Procedures to instrument RWY NAV10 - 84 % progress - Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information ITY-ADQ - 91 % progress LSSIP Year 2019 Belgium - Level 1 4 Released Issue Airport Objectives - Oostende Airport Deployed in 2018 - 2019 None By 2020
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Runway Performance Report 2020
    Ostend Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Looking at the distribution of traffic per runway, it driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, can be seen that 2020 follows the trends of 2017 and capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This 2019, with runway 26 being preferentially used. 2018 report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Ostend- was a year with more north-easterly winds recorded Bruges International Airport (International Civil at all Belgian airports, implying a more frequent use Aviation Organization (ICAO) code EBOS). Its aim is of runway 08. In 2020, winds blew predominantly to provide our main stakeholders with traffic figures from the South-West, with an exception for the for 2020 and relevant data on the performance of our months of April and May where more easterly winds operations at Ostend Airport, namely on three of the were registered and the use of runway 26 dropped to four KPA’s: safety, capacity and environment. around 40% (being on average at 71% for the whole year). Traffic Safety The year 2020 will be remembered for the breakout of the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic, which Three topics are presented in this report: greatly impacted aviation. Low records of traffic were missed approaches, runway incidents, such registered in Ostend-Bruges International Airport, as runway incursions, and improvements and with an average drop of 25% in comparison with 2019. recommendations. Regarding the first matter, Furthermore, in April 2020, during the COVID-19 first Ostend Airport registered 11 missed approaches wave, a reduction in flights of 76% was seen in the overall in 2020, ten on runway 26 and one on runway airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Runway Performance Report 2020
    Brussels Airport RUNWAY PERFORMANCE REPORT 2020 member of FABEC / www.skeyes.be EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Air Traffic Management (ATM) Performance is Safety driven by four Key Performance Areas (KPAs): safety, capacity, environment and cost-efficiency. This Two types of events are analysed in this report, both report focuses on skeyes’ operations at Brussels giving a view on airport safety performance: missed Airport (ICAO code EBBR). Its aim is to provide our approaches and runway incursions (RI). Overall, main stakeholders with traffic figures for 2020 and 2020 has seen a decrease in terms of missed relevant data on the performance of the operations approaches by 49%. Even though the number at EBBR, namely on three of four KPA’s: safety, of arrivals has decreased by nearly 60%, capacity and environment. an increase of 25% in the rate of missed approaches per 1,000 arrivals has been registered. The reasons The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant for rates to increase were various: low level social and economic impacts throughout the world. of traffic, single runway operations where one (1) Many countries, including Belgium, decided to of the three (3) runways was used simultaneously, impose a variety of measures in order to prevent the three (3) storms that occurred in February 2020, spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. Those measures Northeast wind in April and May and/or closure of mainly affected people movements which eventual- RWY 07L/25R due to the runway renovation works. ly lead to unprecedented levels of disruption In 2020 the most common reason for missed in countries throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • VFE Workshop Final Report
    FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency (VFE) Workshop Report 10 December 2020 Maastricht UAC / Online virtual meeting DOCUMENT SUMMARY Objective: A workshop with FABEC ANSPs and industry stakeholders (mainly aircraft operators) to discuss vertical flight efficiency, to exchange views and to explore how to improve VFE and new VFE indicators. Origin: FABEC SC ENV Audience: Members of the FABEC ANSP teams along with representatives from NM, airlines, CFSPs. Title : FABEC Vertical Flight Efficiency Workshop Reference: FABEC VFE Workshop Report v1.0 Version : 1.0 Date : 12/02/2021 Status : Classification : Public FABEC limited Draft Addressees Released limited DOCUMENT CHANGE RECORD Version Date Changes Author 0.1 15/01/2021 Draft Jean-Michel Edard & Alexander Vanwelsenaere 0.2 21/01/2021 Amendments Nadine Meesen 0.3 11/02/2021 Amendments Theo Hendriks, David Brain, Michaël Sanczuk, Sophie Baranes, Robert Sklorz 1.0 12/02/2021 Jean-Michel Edard APPROVALS Approved Approved by Approval date Approval outcome version and reference 1.0 Ilona Sitova 12/02/2021 1.1 FX Prach 12/02/2021 2020-12-10-FABEC_VFE_ Workshop_Report_v1.1.docx - 10 Dec 2020 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 2 Agenda ................................................................................................................................ 5 3 Attendees ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview
    EUROCONTROL LSSIP 2019 - ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2019 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2019 for Armenia Info Centre Reference 20/01/15/02 Date of Edition 01/04/2020 LSSIP Focal Point Samvel Baghdasaryan - [email protected] – ARMATS LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioară - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for Agency Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky- implementation-monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-plan-level-3-2019 Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm- 2019 master-plan-implementation-report-level-3-2019 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] FAB Performance Plan Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] LSSIP Year 2019 Armenia - Level 1 Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2019 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre
    MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre MUAC AO AIRAC 2107 Brief – 15-07-2021 Introduction The MUAC AO AIRAC Brief informs AOs and CFSPs about significant changes in routeings and RAD restrictions in the MUAC airspace. It does not supersede the official publication of AIP or RAD; it rather aims to provide complementary information regarding some changes which affect flight planning in the MUAC airspace. This Brief includes a summary of changes which become effective on AIRAC 15-07-2021. New FRA intermediate waypoint OTMEC Maastricht UAC creates the new FRA Intermediate waypoint OTMEC at position 520403N 0054946E in the Southeast of The Netherlands. Its main purpose is circumnavigation of the military areas EHTRA12Z and EHTRA12AZ. At the same time, five other FRA intermediate waypoints are withdrawn: RENDI, ARNEM, ELPAT, NAPRO, TEBRO. Since the new point OTMEC is located at an ideal position for all flows, the nearby waypoints which were previously used in the legacy ATS-Route structure before being converted to FRA points, have become redundant. Following segments are recommended via OTMEC: Southeast Bound Upstream towards OTMEC Downstream after OTMEC REDFA L620 TACHA DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT COL LAMSO DCT EVELI DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT PODIP TOPPA DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT GMH TOPPA DCT AMGOD DCT OTMEC (when EHD09Z is reserved) OTMEC DCT NOMKA Westbound Upstream towards OTMEC Downstream after OTMEC MAPOX L604 BIGGE DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT NOGRO KEMAD DCT DOMEG DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT ABNED KUMER DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT GALSO LARET DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT NIGUG POVEL DCT OTMEC OTMEC DCT SOMVA HLZ DCT OTMEC HLZ L980 DLE DCT OTMEC (DEP EDDB) BATEL DCT OTMEC ROBEG DCT OTMEC RKN DCT OTMEC MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre MUAC AO AIRAC Brief Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre New FRA intermediate waypoint EMMUN Maastricht UAC creates the new FRA Intermediate waypoint EMMUN at position 524000N 0070200E in the East of The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010
    EUROCONTROL History Book December 2010 By John McInally Head of Organisational Development 1991 - 2010 EUROCONTROL Table of content Introduction 5 Executive summary 9 History of EUROCONTROL - Timeline 1910-2008 17 Part 1 1958-1966 25 Genesis of EUROCONTROL, original vision, sovereignty defined Part 2 1966-1986 75 EUROCONTROL continues with revised/reduced mandate Part 3 1986-1997 119 Amended Convention proves insufficient, matse takes key decisions, EUROCONTROL acts to revise Convention Part 4 1997-2008 191 Early Implementation, EUROCONTROL Adapts to Single European Sky, Growing Concentration on the Network Annex 1 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Permanent Commission 293 Annex 2 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Committee of management 295 Annex 3 Directors General of the Agency 298 Annex 4 Presidents and Vice-Presidents of the Provisional Council 299 Annex 5 Chairmen of the Civil-military Coordination Committee and military ATm Board 300 Annex 6 Ratification of the revised Convention 301 3 Introduction Introduction This History is a description of the key institutional, legal and organisational events and decisions that have determined the progress of the EUROCONTROL Organisation and its Agency through the past fifty years. It is a record, in one document, of the circumstances surrounding these events and the nature of the performance of EUROCONTROL against what was required of it. Who makes up the audience for this history? It is principally aimed at those past and present Eurocontrollers, including State representatives, as well as those who have been involved with EUROCONTROL at different times through the consultation groups and working arrangements. The reader should note therefore that this is a “History”.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Air Traffic Management July 2020
    Draft proposal for a European Partnership under Horizon Europe Integrated Air Traffic Management July 2020 Summary Digital transformation of ATM, making the European airspace the most efficient and environmentally friendly sky to fly in the world, supporting the competitiveness and recovery of the European aviation sector in a post-COVID crisis Europe. Key areas: improving connectivity, air-ground integration and automation, increasing resilience and scalability of airspace management, safe integration of autonomous vehicles. Deliver by 2030 the solutions identified in the European ATM Master Plan for Phase D at TRL 6 while significantly increasing market uptake for a critical mass of early movers focusing on Phase C and D infrastructure modernisation priorities. 1 About this draft In autumn 2019 the Commission services asked potential partners to further elaborate proposals for the candidate European Partnerships identified during the strategic planning of Horizon Europe. These proposals have been developed by potential partners based on common guidance and template, taking into account the initial concepts developed by the Commission and feedback received from Member States during early consultation1. The Commission Services have guided revisions during drafting to facilitate alignment with the overall EU political ambition and compliance with the criteria for Partnerships. This document is a stable draft of the partnership proposal, released for the purpose of ensuring transparency of information on the current status of preparation (including on the process for developing the Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda). As such, it aims to contribute to further collaboration, synergies and alignment between partnership candidates, as well as more broadly with related R&I stakeholders in the EU, and beyond where relevant.
    [Show full text]
  • SWIM Success Stories – Moving Towards Implementation
    SESAR SWIM Success Stories – Moving towards implementation What was a high-level concept a few years ago, system wide information management (SWIM) is now becoming a reality! The four editions of the SESAR SWIM Master Class have largely contributed to progressing SWIM concepts and standards into advanced prototypes and solutions in all ATM areas such as meteorological information, airport operations, extended arrival management, the integration of remotely-piloted aircraft systems, etc. This remarkable achievement could only happen with the involvement of dedicated pioneers. Discover here a selection of these SWIM success stories. More stories are welcome! 1 Table of Contents 37TATOS37T ....................................................................................................................................................................3 37TAVITECH37T .............................................................................................................................................................5 37TEUMETNET37T ........................................................................................................................................................7 37TEUROCONTROL 37T ............................................................................................................................................ 10 37TFREQUENTIS37T .................................................................................................................................................. 14 37TIDS37T ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability Report 2019
    Sustainability report 2019 www.skeyes.be “ We have the responsibility to protect the environment beyond the statutory requirements.” / 02 Table of contents 1. CONTEXT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGY 04 1.1. About this report 05 1.2. Foreword 08 1.3. About skeyes 12 1.4. CSR strategy 16 1.5. Our stakeholders 19 2. PERFORMANCE AND ACHIEVEMENTS 22 2.1. Sustainable 23 2.2. Engaged 30 2.3. Shared 34 APPENDIX 38 GRI reference table 39 Abbreviations used 42 skeyes Sustainability report 2019 / 03 1. CONTEXT AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY STRATEGY 1.1. About this report skeyes proudly presents its first In this report you will find an overview sustainability report in accordance with the of our corporate social responsibility GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) Guidelines strategy and the actions we took in the for 2019. Not that sustainability hasn’t been past year. At a time when emissions important to skeyes in all the years leading originating from the aviation sector are up to this point. In fact, it is very simple: firmly in the spotlight, and sustainability anyone who engages in corporate social issues such as climate change are of responsibility must also be accountable to great concern to our stakeholders and society. This self-evidence deserves greater personnel, skeyes believes it crucial to focus, because it is important to society communicate about its sustainability that companies prove their sustainability. efforts, actions and performance in a more transparent manner. Moreover, this report naturally offers added value in terms of communication with customers, employees, stakeholders The specific results of the first CSR and supporters: we aim to demonstrate report reveal how a sustainability what we think, do and feel more clearly.
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview
    LSSIP 2020 - ARMENIA LOCAL SINGLE SKY IMPLEMENTATION Level2020 1 - Implementation Overview Document Title LSSIP Year 2020 for Armenia Info Centre Reference 20/12/22/50 Date of Edition 19/03/2021 LSSIP Focal Point Samvel Baghdasaryan - [email protected] – ARMATS LSSIP Contact Person Octavian Cioară - [email protected] EUROCONTROL / NMD/INF/PAS LSSIP Support Team [email protected] Status Released Intended for EUROCONTROL Stakeholders Available in https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Reference Documents LSSIP Documents https://www.eurocontrol.int/service/local-single-sky-implementation- monitoring Master Plan Level 3 – Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Edition 2020 implementation-plan-level-3 Master Plan Level 3 – Report https://www.eurocontrol.int/publication/european-atm-master-plan- Year 2020 implementation-report-level-3 European ATM Portal https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ STATFOR Forecasts https://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor National AIP Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] FAB Performance Plan Request should be sent to e-mail: [email protected] LSSIP Year 2020 Armenia Released Issue APPROVAL SHEET The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2020 document and the signatures confirm the correctness of the reported information and reflect the commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 (Implementation View) – Edition 2020. LSSIP Year 2020 Armenia
    [Show full text]
  • Impact on European Aviation
    8 July 2021 COVID 19 EUROCONTROL IMPACT ON Comprehensive Assessment EUROPEAN AVIATION SUPPORTING EUROPEAN AVIATION 1 Headlines Traffic Situation Daily flights (including overflights) . 21,567 flights (62% of 2019 levels) on Wed 7 July 2021, increase (+19%) over 2 weeks. Renewed traffic increase (2-digit) since early July—after the first jump early June. Record number on 2 July with Traffic over the last 7 days is 23,772 (since March 2020). Ryanair, busiest operator, with about 1,000 additional flights per day since start of June. easyJet added extra Compared to capacity over the last two weeks. Low cost airlines are now operating 54% of 2019 flight volumes. equivalent days in 2019 . High increase for many States over the last two weeks, flows between North-West Europe and Southern Europe 38% intensify: France (+27%), Spain (+26%), Turkey (+29%), Germany (+21%), Italy (+29%) and Greece (+35%). Domestic flows are still dominating in terms of traffic volumes (France, Italy), noticeable increases on flows between Germany and Turkey as well as Russian Federation and Turkey. Domestic traffic vs 2019: Europe (-47%), US (-19%), China (-7%) (situation easing after lockdown in the Guanghzou area), Middle-East (-31%) 2 2 Top 10 Busiest Airports 7-day average Dep/Arr flights on 1-7 July, compared to 2019 Average flights per day Average flights per day Top 10 Airports (week 1-7/7) (week 1-7/7) vs 2019 Market Segments Amsterdam 900 -40% On 7 July, compared to 2019 IGA Istanbul Airport 891 -29% Frankfurt 854 -44% Paris/Charles-De-Gaulle 816 -46% 46% 47% 9% Low cost Traditional Business Madrid/Barajas 736 -42% Aviation Antalya 695 -26% Palma De Mallorca 659 -29% Istanbul/Sabiha Gokcen 637 -5% 16% 5% Non-Scheduled/ All Cargo Athens 636 -23% Charter Barcelona 605 -44% Economics Passengers Traffic Flow (02 July 2021) (17 June 2021) On 7 July, the intra-European traffic flow was Fuel price 2.4 million pax 17,232 + 20% -38% -5.4 million 191 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
    EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR THE SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION EUROCONTROL EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE A COMPLEXITY STUDY OF THE MAASTRICHT UPPER AIRSPACE CENTRE EEC Report No. 403 Project COCA Issued: February 2006 The information contained in this document is the property of the EUROCONTROL Agency and no part should be reproduced in any form without the Agency’s permission. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the Agency. REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Reference: Security Classification: EEC Report No. 403 Unclassified Originator: Originator (Corporate Author) Name/Location: EEC – NCD EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre Centre de Bois des Bordes Network Capacity & Demand B.P.15 F - 91222 Brétigny-sur-Orge Cedex FRANCE Telephone: +33 (0)1 69 88 75 00 Sponsor: Sponsor (Contract Authority) Name/Location: EATM EUROCONTROL Agency 96, Rue de la Fusée B - 1130 Brussels BELGIUM Telephone: +32 (0)2 729 90 11 WEB Site: www.eurocontrol.int TITLE: A COMPLEXITY STUDY OF THE MAASTRICHT UPPER AIRSPACE CENTRE Authors Date Pages Figures Tables Annexes References Geraldine M Flynn 02/2006 xii + 91 49 19 7 7 Claire Leleu (Isa Software) Brian Hilburn (Stasys) EEC Contact Project Task No. Sponsor Period COCA 2004 - 2005 Distribution Statement: (a) Controlled by: Head of NCD (b) Special Limitations: None Descriptors (keywords): Complexity indicators, Complexity factors, Sectors classification, Sector I/D cards, Maastricht UAC, Capacity indicators, Workload evaluation. Abstract: This report describes a complexity study performed on all the Maastricht UAC sectors. Particular focus was put on the Brussels sectors in the vicinity of the REMBA navaid to assess if airspace changes made in May 2004 resulted in a reduction of complexity.
    [Show full text]