DOCSLIB.ORG

Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Report to Congress Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study Report U .S . Fish and Wildlife Service Department of Interior Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Great Lakes Coordination Office Great Lakes Fishery Resources Offices Dale P. Burkett - Overall Study Manager/Report Editor Wolf-Dieter N Busch - Lake Ontario & Lake Erie Study Manager Ferry R. McClain - Lake Huron Study Manager Mark E. Holey - Lake Michigan Study Manager Thomas R. Busiahn - Lake Superior Study Manager May C. Fabrizio - Fish Community Dynamics Researcher, National Biological Service, Great Lakes Science Center Acknowledgements The Service gratefully acknowledges our Bad River Tribal Council, Bay Mills Indian, Community of Michi- gan, Chippewa-Ottawa Treaty Fishery Management Authority, Grand Portage Reservation, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, Great Lakes Commission, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Keweenaw Bay Indian Community, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Sault Ste . Marie Band of Chippewa Indians, U.S . Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Great Lakes National Program Office, U .S. National Biological Service-Great Lakes Science Center, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources partners for assistance in contributing information to and reviewing drafts of this document and for their many helpful comments and suggestions. Without the tireless, selfless, and dedicated efforts of Service staff in the Great Lakes Coordination Office and the Lower Great Lakes, Alpena, Green Bay, and Ashland Fishery-Resources Offices, this report could not have been completed. United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D .C. 20240 IN REPLY REFER TO, FWSIMA SEP 13 1995 The Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. President of the Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. President: We are pleased to submit the Great Lakes Fishery Resources Study that was undertaken pursuant to Section 2005(a) of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act, P.L. 101-537. This report focuses on the status of fishery resources and habitat in the Great Lakes Basin including the effectiveness of present management plans, and analysis of the impacts and management control alternatives for recently introduced nonindigenous species . Recommenda- tions have been developed regarding those actions necessary to restore the fishery resources of the Great Lakes Basin to sustainable levels . Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions or comments . Sincerely, ' Director Enclosure United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Washington, D .C. 20240 I N REPLY REFER TO . FWS/MA SEP t 3 1995 The Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Mr. Speaker: We are pleased to submit the Great Lakes Fishery Resources Study that was undertaken pursuant to Section 2005(a) of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act, P .L. 101-537. This report focuses on the status of fishery resources and habitat in the Great Lakes Basin including the effectiveness of present management plans, and analysis of the impacts and management control alternatives for recently introduced nonindigenous species . Recommenda- tions have been developed regarding those actions necessary to restore the fishery resources of the Great Lakes Basin to sustainable levels . Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you have any questions or comments . Sincerely, . Director Enclosure Contents; Table of Contents awnLakeOntarti Trophic Guild Analyses 31 Executive Summary vi Trophic guild definitions .. 31 Limitations to using commercial data 32 Findings and Recommendations viii Historic and Current Status of Fishery ntroduction Resource and Trends 32 Offshore fish community 32 1 Purpose of the Document Nearshore/tributary fish community 47 Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Causes of Changes in Lake Ontario Fishery Restoration Act 1 Resources and Management Strategies 56 Historic perspective 1 Physical factors 56 Background information 1 Chemical factors 59 Purposes of the Act 2 Biological factors 59 Great Lakes Fishery Resources Restoration Study 3 Study objectives 3 Historic and Current Status of Fishery Development of proposals 4 Resource and Trends 69 Offshore fish community 69 Great Lakes Basin Description 5 Nearshore/tributary fish community 76 Great Lakes climate 5 Physiographics, hydrographics, Causes of Changes in Lake Erie Fishery and trophic state 5 Resources and Management Strategies 90 Socioeconomics 15 Physical factors 90 Chemical factors 91 Ecosystem Approach 4.6 Biological factors 93 Ecosystem Health Concepts 20 Support for the Ecosystem Approach 21 Historic and Current Status of Fishery Resource and Trends 100 Setting Ecosystem Goals and Objectives 22 Offshore fish community 102 Nearshore fish community 110 Lake Ontario : An Ecosystem Approach Nearshore fish community-warmwater Case Example 22 bays 112 Habitat classification methodology 23 27 Lake Ontario tributary habitats Causes of Changes in Lake Huron Fishery Resources and Management Strategies 113 Causes of changes in Lake Huron fishery resources 113 Management strategies in Lake Huron 113 ii inA, i a fWaluatom of istiing° Maag `mment Plans .'' it' .'.s;imp?* eA/~`?.. Historic and Current Status of Fishery Resource and Trends 115 Interagency Fishery Management Plans 148 Offshore fish community 116 Fish management planning 148 Nearshore fish community 120 Coordinated fishery management 149 Causes of Changes in Lake Michigan Fishery Ecosystem Partnership Coordination 150 Resources and Management Strategies 122 Causes of changes in Lake Michigan fishery resources 122 Management strategies in Lake Michigan 124 Philosophical, Ethical, and Decision-making Considerations 151 Lack of historic knowledge and expertise 151 Changing ethos 151 Historic and Current Status of Fishery Decision-making and public Resource and Trends 125 expectations 152 Offshore fish community 125 Inshore fish community 128 Effects of Impediments to Ecosystem Nearshore fish community 129 Restoration 153 Tributary fish community 131 Examples of Impediments Restoring a Causes of Changes in Lake Superior Fishery Healthy Ecosystem 153 Resources and Management Strategies 131 Causes of changes in Lake Superior 157 fishery resources 131 Management strategies in Lake Superior 172 135 Basin wide Researcl oa Fish PopulattnDynaic~ ~ ► Citica Evaluation of Histor OtData Restoration Ecology of Lake Trout 139 Dynamics of Great Lakes Forage-fish Communities 141 Community Dynamics of Commercially-harvested Fishes 145 111 Contents List of Figures Figure 1 . Appropriations and authorized funding levels for the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 . vii Figure 2 . Map illustrating the Great Lakes watershed. 5 Figure 3 . Map illustrating the four basins of Lake Ontario . 5 Figure 4. Map illustrating the three basins of Lake Erie . 8 Figure 4a . Lake Huron contours . 9 Figure 5 . Lake Michigan contours . 11 Figure 6 . Lake Superior contours. 12 Figure 7 . Conceptual representation of the degradation of an ecosystem and the recovery due to restoration initiatives . 22 Figure 8 . Dichotomous Key scores by stress category for Lake Ontario. 26 Figure 9 . Total riverine habitat(km) in five U .S. Lake Ontario tributaries impacted by the construction of dams . 28 Figure 10 . Percent composition of habitat available to fishes in five U .S. Lake Ontario tributaries up to the first impassible barrier . 29 Figure 11 . Free-flowing riverine habitat (km) available to migrating fishes in five Lake Ontario tributaries . 30 Figure 12 . Offshore trophic fish communities (guilds) for Lake Ontario . 34 Figure 13 . Trends in the Lake Ontario offshore planktivorous guild, as represented by commercial harvest records . 34 Figure 14 . Annual commercial harvest of rainbow smelt from Lake Ontario . 35 Figure 15 . Changes in total phosphorous and zooplankton production in Lake Ontario . 36 Figure 16 . Biomass index of alewife and smelt in Lake Ontario . 36 Figure 17 . Trawl indices of abundance for the largest alewife and smelt in Lake Ontario . 36 Figure 18. Trends in the Lake Ontario offshore macroinvertivorous guild . 37 Figure 19. Commercial catch of Lake Ontario lake whitefish . 38 Figure 20 . Standard gillnet indices of abundance for lake whitefish in Lake Ontario . 39 Figure 21 . Trends in the Lake Ontario offshore indigenous piscivorous guild . 40 Figure 22 . Annual commercial harvest of blue pike and walleye from Lake Ontario . 42 Figure 23 . Millions of indigenous and nonindigenous piscivorous fish stocked annually in Lake Ontario . 43 Figure 24 . Trends in the Lake Ontario nearshoreltributary trophic fish communities (guilds) for Lake Ontario . 48 Figure 25 . Trend of the Lake Ontario nearshoreltributary, omnivorous guild . 49 Figure 26 . Abundance index of omnivorous fishes in Lake Ontario tributaries. 49 Figure 27 . Abundance index of gizzard shad and golden shiner. 50 Figure 28 . Abundance index of macroinvertivorous fishes in Lake Ontario tributaries . 51 Figure 29 . Trend in U.S .Lake Ontario tributary, macroinvertivorous guild . 51 Figure 30 . Trends in the Lake Ontario
Recommended publications
  • Seasonal and Diel Movements and Habitat Use of Robust Redhorses in the Lower Savannah River. Georgia, and South Carolina

    Seasonal and Diel Movements and Habitat Use of Robust Redhorses in the Lower Savannah River. Georgia, and South Carolina

    Transactions of the American FisheriesSociety 135:1145-1155, 2006 [Article] © Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2006 DO: 10.1577/705-230.1 Seasonal and Diel Movements and Habitat Use of Robust Redhorses in the Lower Savannah River, Georgia and South Carolina TIMOTHY B. GRABOWSKI*I Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina,29634-0326, USA J. JEFFERY ISELY U.S. Geological Survey, South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 29634-0372, USA Abstract.-The robust redhorse Moxostonta robustum is a large riverine catostomid whose distribution is restricted to three Atlantic Slope drainages. Once presumed extinct, this species was rediscovered in 1991. Despite being the focus of conservation and recovery efforts, the robust redhorse's movements and habitat use are virtually unknown. We surgically implanted pulse-coded radio transmitters into 17 wild adults (460-690 mm total length) below the downstream-most dam on the Savannah River and into 2 fish above this dam. Individuals were located every 2 weeks from June 2002 to September 2003 and monthly thereafter to May 2005. Additionally, we located 5-10 individuals every 2 h over a 48-h period during each season. Study fish moved at least 24.7 ± 8.4 river kilometers (rkm; mean ± SE) per season. This movement was generally downstream except during spring. Some individuals moved downstream by as much as 195 rkm from their release sites. Seasonal migrations were correlated to seasonal changes in water temperature. Robust redhorses initiated spring upstream migrations when water temperature reached approximately 12'C. Our diel tracking suggests that robust redhorses occupy small reaches of river (- 1.0 rkm) and are mainly active diumally.
  • Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review

    Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review

    Chautauqua County Envirothon Wildlife Review • William Printup, Civil Engineering • Wendy Andersen, Permitting Allegheny National Forest Slide 1 Wildlife Learning Objectives For successful completion of the wildlife section, contestants should be able to: 1. Assess suitability of habitat for given wildlife species 2. Identify signs of wildlife 3. Cite examples of food chains based on specific site conditions 4. Analyze/Interpret site factors that limit or enhance population growth, both in the field and with aerial photos 5. Interpret significance of habitat alteration due to human impacts on site 6. Evaluate factors that might upset ecological balance of a specific site 7. Identify wildlife by their tracks, skulls, pelts, etc. 8. Interpret how presence of wildlife serves as an indicator of environmental quality 9. Identify common wildlife food Slide 2 WILDLIFE OUTLINE I. Identification of NYS Species (http://www.dec.ny.gov/23.html) • A. Identify NYS wildlife species by specimens, skins/pelts, pictures, skulls, silhouettes, decoys, wings, feathers, scats, tracks, animal sounds, or other common signs • B. Identify general food habits, habitats, and habits from teeth and/or skull morphology • C. Specific habitats of the above • II. Wildlife Ecology • A. Basic ecological concepts and terminology • B. Wildlife population dynamics • 1) Carrying capacity • 2) Limiting factors • C. Adaptations of wildlife • 1) Anatomical, physiological and/or behavioral • D. Biodiversity • 1) Genetic, species, ecosystem or community Slide 3 Outline Continued.. • III. Wildlife Conservation and Management • A. Common management practices and methods • 1) Conservation • 2) Protection • 3) Enhancement • B. Hunting regulations • C. Land conflicts with wildlife habitat needs • D. Factors influencing management decisions • 1) Ecological • 2) Financial •3) Social • E.
  • Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated

    Rubus Arcticus Ssp. Acaulis Is Also Appreciated

    Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 18, 2006 Juanita A. R. Ladyman, Ph.D. JnJ Associates LLC 6760 S. Kit Carson Cir E. Centennial, CO 80122 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Ladyman, J.A.R. (2006, October 18). Rubus arcticus L. ssp. acaulis (Michaux) Focke (dwarf raspberry): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http:// www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/rubusarcticussspacaulis.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The time spent and help given by all the people and institutions mentioned in the reference section are gratefully acknowledged. I would also like to thank the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, in particular Bonnie Heidel, and the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, in particular David Anderson, for their generosity in making their records available. The data provided by Lynn Black of the DAO Herbarium and National Vascular Plant Identification Service in Ontario, Marta Donovan and Jenifer Penny of the British Columbia Conservation Data Center, Jane Bowles of University of Western Ontario Herbarium, Dr. Kadri Karp of the Aianduse Instituut in Tartu, Greg Karow of the Bighorn National Forest, Cathy Seibert of the University of Montana Herbarium, Dr. Anita Cholewa of the University of Minnesota Herbarium, Dr. Debra Trock of the Michigan State University Herbarium, John Rintoul of the Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, and Prof. Ron Hartman and Joy Handley of the Rocky Mountain Herbarium at Laramie, were all very valuable in producing this assessment.
  • MAPPING and CHARACTERIZING a RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA in CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN by Christopher B. Connallon a THESIS Submitted T

    MAPPING and CHARACTERIZING a RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA in CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN by Christopher B. Connallon a THESIS Submitted T

    MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZING A RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA IN CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN By Christopher B. Connallon A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Geography – Master of Science 2015 ABSTRACT MAPPING AND CHARACTERIZING A RELICT LACUSTRINE DELTA IN CENTRAL LOWER MICHIGAN By Christopher B. Connallon This research focuses on, mapping and characterizing the Chippewa River delta - a sandy, relict delta of Glacial Lake Saginaw in central Lower Michigan. The delta was first identified in a GIS, using digital soil data, as the sandy soils of the delta stand in contrast to the loamier soils of the lake plain. I determined the textural properties of the delta sediment from 142 parent material samples at ≈1.5 m depth. The data were analyzed in a GIS to identify textural trends across the delta. Data from 3276 water well logs across the delta, and from 185 sites within two-storied soils on the delta margin, were used to estimate the thickness of delta sands and to refine the delta's boundary. The delta heads near Mount Pleasant, expanding east, onto the Lake Saginaw plain. It is ≈18 km wide and ≈38 km long and comprised almost entirely of sandy sediment. As expected, delta sands generally thin away from the head, where sediments are ≈4-7m thick. In the eastern, lower portion of the delta, sediments are considerably thinner (≈<1-2m). The texturally coarsest parts of the delta are generally coincident with former shorezones. The thick, upper delta portion is generally coincident with the relict shorelines of Lakes Saginaw and Arkona (≈17.1k to ≈ 16k years BP), whereas most of the thin, distal, lower delta is generally associated with Lake Warren (≈15k years BP).
  • Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa

    Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa

    Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa By Jun Cheng A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto © Copyright Jun Cheng 2013 Spatial Criteria Used in IUCN Assessment Overestimate Area of Occupancy for Freshwater Taxa Jun Cheng Masters of Science Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto 2013 Abstract Area of Occupancy (AO) is a frequently used indicator to assess and inform designation of conservation status to wildlife species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The applicability of the current grid-based AO measurement on freshwater organisms has been questioned due to the restricted dimensionality of freshwater habitats. I investigated the extent to which AO influenced conservation status for freshwater taxa at a national level in Canada. I then used distribution data of 20 imperiled freshwater fish species of southwestern Ontario to (1) demonstrate biases produced by grid-based AO and (2) develop a biologically relevant AO index. My results showed grid-based AOs were sensitive to spatial scale, grid cell positioning, and number of records, and were subject to inconsistent decision making. Use of the biologically relevant AO changed conservation status for four freshwater fish species and may have important implications on the subsequent conservation practices. ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank many people who have supported and helped me with the production of this Master’s thesis. First is to my supervisor, Dr. Donald Jackson, who was the person that inspired me to study aquatic ecology and conservation biology in the first place, despite my background in environmental toxicology.
  • Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

    Nipigon Bay Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010 Nipigon Bay is in the most northerly area of Lake Superior. The Area of Concern takes in a large portion of Nipigon Bay and the Nipigon River, the largest tributary to Lake Superior, and the communities of Red Rock and Nipigon. There are Ontario Power Generation dams on the Nipigon River for the generation of hydroelectricity. The area supports a variety of wetlands and bird populations, including one of four known pelican colonies in Ontario. The watershed forests on both sides of the Nipigon River have been allocated for forest harvesting. Environmental concerns in the Nipigon Bay Area of Concern are related to water level and flow fluctuations in Lake Nipigon and the Nipigon River from the generation of hydroelectricity. These fluctuations affect stream bank stability, sediment load and fish and wildlife habitat. Other concerns include the accumulation of wood fibre, bark and other organic material from past log drives, and effluent discharges from a linerboard mill (which closed in 2006) and the municipal sewage treatment plants in Nipigon and Red Rock. PARTNERSHIPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Nipigon Bay was designated an Area of Concern in 1987 under the Canada–United States Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Areas of Concern are sites on the Great Lakes system where environmental quality is significantly degraded and beneficial uses are impaired. Currently, there are 9 such designated areas on the Canadian side of the Great Lakes, 25 in the United States, and 5 that are shared by both countries. In each Area of Concern, government, community and industry partners are undertaking a coordinated effort to restore environmental quality and beneficial uses through a remedial action plan.
  • More Than Just a Lake! TOPIC Great Lake Drainage Basins AUDIENCE Grades 1-6; 10-30 Students

    More Than Just a Lake! TOPIC Great Lake Drainage Basins AUDIENCE Grades 1-6; 10-30 Students

    More Than Just a Lake! TOPIC Great Lake drainage basins AUDIENCE Grades 1-6; 10-30 students SETTING By creating a map of the rivers flowing into your Great Lake, Large, open indoor space is learn how rivers form a watershed. required GOAL To understand the concept of a drainage basin or watershed, and how that concept relates to the BACKGROUND around the lake as gravity pulls water local Great Lake watershed. All lakes and rivers have a set area to the lowest point. Water draining of land that water drains into them to the lowest common point is the OBJECTIVES • Students will understand the from, called the “watershed” or simplest definition of a watershed. defining role that rivers have “drainage basin.” Drainage basins are in watershed activity important environmentally because 2. Introduction to the model • Students will be able to state whether they live inside or whatever happens within the basin of watershed outside the drainage basin of the lake can happen to the lake itself. Students gather around the “shore” their Great Lake Toxic substances spilled or placed of the lake. Explain that the blue • Older students will be able to identify the river drainage on the land or in watershed rivers yarn represents rivers. With younger basin in which they live can end up in the lake. See the Great students, demonstrate how one river Lakes Watershed Fact Sheets for ad- might look on the map as it flows MATERIALS ditional information about your local into your Great Lake. • Large floor map of your Great Lake (or an outline on the watershed.
  • N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery

    N Shore L. Superior: Geology, Scenery

    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
  • Great Lakes Region, USA

    Great Lakes Region, USA

    Spatial variation in till texture and clay mineralogy across the Saginaw Lobe terrain, Great Lakes region, USA Department of Geography, Environment and Spatial Sciences, Randall J. Schaetzl, Chris Baish, Jarrod Knauff, Thomas Bilintoh, East Lansing, Michigan, USA Dan Wanyama, Kevin McKeehan, and Michelle Church Abstract STUDY AREA SAMPLE DISTRIBUTION Great Lakes region We present a spatial/mapping approach to the study of the glacial history of the Saginaw lobe of the Laurentide Ice Sheet. The Saginaw Lobe flowed into southern Michigan, USA, forming modern-day Saginaw Bay and leaving behind a series of small moraines in down- ice locations. Upon its retreat – and likely also during its advance – a large proglacial lake (Glacial Lake Saginaw) formed in the northeastern margins of the “Saginaw terrain”. The Saginaw lobe advanced to the southwest, out of this lake basin and onto thinly mantled, sandstone and shale bedrock. Although the Late Pleistocene deglacial chronology of this lobe has been generally assumed for decades, few numerical ages exist that could help constrain a better defined timeline. Indeed, as luminescence ages slowly emerge for terrain of the Saginaw Lobe and nearby areas, it seems clear that the lobe retreated from the region considerably earlier than is generally assumed, adding to the potential for large areas of ponded water in proglacial settings, all of which are as yet unmapped. In this project, we sampled tills on uplands across the terrain of the Saginaw Lobe, avoiding outwash plains. In all, we obtained 334 samples of calcareous till, by bucket auger. Sample locations were sited generally uniformly across >20,000 km2.
  • The State of Lake Huron in 2010 Special Publication 13-01

    The State of Lake Huron in 2010 Special Publication 13-01

    THE STATE OF LAKE HURON IN 2010 SPECIAL PUBLICATION 13-01 The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes. The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission.
  • Ellsworth American COUNTY Dunham’S Hotel

    Ellsworth American COUNTY Dunham’S Hotel

    Sbfcntfennmt*. Rsed, of Kllsworth, and Mrs. Annie 'Itjfnrtiacmmis. _ v- LOCAL AFFAIRS. Powers, of Bangor. Mrs. Higgins had friends in Ellsworth who NEW AI1VKUTIM M ENT* THIS WEEK. many regret C. 0. RURRILL & deeply to hear of her death. She visited SON, state assessor**’ notice. here about two *■* I‘s ('omtnissiiiu of fi-h and fisheries—Sealed years ago. ^ 1 proposals. The Mutual Life Insurance Co., of New Hancork lmll— M urrDon ( omeily « «>. m j of m qenekal INSURANCE Robert It H" in. < *<ut *\ culture *»ale- York, *, |Kent, of this city, j AGENTS, I’anook Is a speciafagent, has paid through Mr. Hi him Bank Bldg., ELLSWORTH, ME. Tyler, Fogg A « •»—Municipal bonds. Kent the policy of |15,0CK) on the life of ^ Rockland, My the late W. it. Blaisdell, of Franklin. ARSOL«JT.F*v 'piJRE Rockland Cumin* rc’.al < *•!!* ;<■. WE REPRESENT THE This is one of the largest policies of life \ A '•:iimri)1 '* > in«u1 me v; paid in this vicinity. Makes the food more de'icious and v 'v '. sew Most Kciiiihle Home ami Foreign Coni pan it's. Curtis Novelty < <>— Agent wanted George W. Davis, of Boston, formerly J'■■//> a ih/r V'i/h ! ■■■■■■■BHanannaHDunaniaaBHBaMHManiir^nMnnnnHr «ommJ9 L Safi )J. of this a brother of 10. Davis, t'nvijmt Far othrr focal news see pages •/, .7 and S. city, Henry lias purchased the Tontine house at Miss Mari* *i of Auburndaln, In sums to Hu it on real c.si ate and Morgan, Unitarian noinc. improved Brunswick. The Tontine is a popular re- of the engine had passed over the boy’s Conference at MON KY TO LOAN J is the guest of Miss Mabel —--- collateral.- ..
  • Download (3MB)

    Download (3MB)

    MAGYAR NYELVŐR 142. ÉVF. * 2018. ÁPRILIS–JÚNIUS * 2. SZÁM Dayka Gábornak Aorthographia címet kapott, kéziratban fennmaradt magyar nyelvű, nyelvészeti jellegű írásáról 1. Bevezetés. A tervem az, hogy a nyelvtudomány-történet keretében bemutas- sam a mindössze huszonnyolc évet élt, sajátos hangú 18. századi költőnek, Dayka Gábornak a kéziratban fennmaradt nyelvtani, egyáltalán nyelvészeti irányultsá- gú munkáit. A sorrendet illetően a Dayka-kutatáshoz alapot nyújtó Dayka Gábor Összes Művei című kötetet követem (az adatait l. DGÖM). Ez a kötet egyébként tartalmazza Dayka Gábornak – költői és prózai alkotásain kívül – a következő nyelvtani, nyelvészeti jellegű írásait: „Grammatikák és grammatikai jegyzetek: 1. Magyar nyelvű grammatikai tárgyú írások: a) Aorthographia és b) Grammati- kai feljegyzések. – 2. Proludium in Institutiones Linguae Hungaricae. – 3. Ternio Grammaticae Hungaricae 1794” (DGÖM 7). Meg kell jegyeznem, hogy bár e munkáknak se a pontos keletkezési idejét, se egymás utáni következésük sor- rendjét nem lehetett bizonyítottan megállapítani, a DGÖM-ben alkalmazott és idézett sorrend látszik logikusnak és követendőnek. A kötet tartalmazza az ere- deti szövegeken kívül – ha idegen nyelvűek – azok fordítását is, továbbá minden szöveg után a széles körű rálátással megírt jegyzeteket, amelyek megemlékeztek a kéziratról, az illető szöveg megjelenéséről, valamint közölnek szövegkritikát, és „Magyarázatok” címen tárgyalják az illető mű keletkezés- és fogadástörténetét, valamint közölnek számos fogalmat, jelenséget megvilágító megjegyzést. Egyéb- ként a filológusi feldolgozást a lehetséges teljességre, a rendszerességre, a minden lényeges kérdésnek az utánajárására, a logikus felépítésre, a pontosságra, valamint a világos megfogalmazásra való törekvés jellemzi (l. részletesen: DGÖM 64–9). Elöljáróban még szólok több éve tartó Dayka-kutatásaim első eredményé- ről, a Mi vitte Dayka Gábort, a költőt a nyelvtanírás, egyáltalán a nyelvtudomány felé? című tanulmányról (Szathmári 2016).