DOCSLIB.ORG

The Influence of the Interpersonal Dynamic on the American Foreign Policy Diplomová Práce

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Influence of the Interpersonal Dynamic on the American Foreign Policy Diplomová Práce MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra mezinárodních vztahů a evropských studií Obor Mezinárodní vztahy The influence of the interpersonal dynamic on the American foreign policy Diplomová práce Kristýna Dyková Vedoucí: PhDr. Petr Suchý, Ph.D. UČO: 219683 Obor: Mezinárodní vztahy Imatrikulační ročník: 2009 Brno, 2011 Poděkování Na tomto místě bych velice ráda poděkovala panu PhDr. Petru Suchému, Ph.D. za odborné vedení diplomové práce, za konstruktivní kritiku, rady a čas, který mi po celou dobu věnoval. 1 Čestné prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci „The influence of the interpersonal dynamic on the American foreign policy“ vypracovala sama na základě uvedených použitých zdrojů. V Brně, dne 22.5.2011 Kristýna Dyková 2 Obsah INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 4 AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND IT´S PROCESSES .................................................... 6 THE KEY ACTORS OF AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY ................................................ 7 The President ...................................................................................................................... 7 The National Security Council and the National Security Adviser ................................... 7 The Secretary of State and the Department of State .......................................................... 9 Theoretical models of the American foreign policy process ................................................ 10 EISENHOWER ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................... 12 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 15 THE KENNEDY-JOHNSON ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 17 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 24 THE NIXON-FORD ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................. 26 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 32 THE CARTER ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................... 34 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 41 THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION ..................................................................................... 43 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 53 THE GEORGE H. W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION ............................................................... 56 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 61 THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................... 63 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 70 GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................. 72 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 76 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................ 78 LITERATURE ......................................................................................................................... 81 MAIN LITERATURE .......................................................................................................... 81 SUPPORTIVE LITERATURE ............................................................................................ 82 3 INTRODUCTION When America makes some decision in foreign policy, usually the whole world knows it in a very short period of time, because the politics of one of the most powerful country in the world is important for all actors in the international relations. Before the final result of the decision making process is ready to be made public, there is a long way with a lot of influences which take effect on it. There are a lot of actors within the American foreign policy process and there is also a need to coordinate their views, interests and approaches. Concerning foreign policy, the main actors are the President, Secretary of State and National Security Adviser. The personal relationships between them are crucial for the smooth foreign policy. The decisions are made by people and those people have different opinions, based on different experiences. By closer look, all those influences are visible on the final decisions and acts, American administrations are doing in the foreign policy. This thesis is focused on the fact, how the personal relationships between the actors influence the results of foreign policy of USA. Even though the individual level of foreign policy is not topic which is paid much attention to, it is still very important. There are disputes in every administration. It is natural for the people to have different views. The crucial question is, if they will be able to work together and make compromises and how. The situation is always better in the administration, where the members are able to come to the compromise and once it is reached they all speak one voice. On the other hand, it is more complicated when the President needs to choose from the irreconcilable opinion groups, there are “losers” and “winners” and the administration is not able to act jointly. Another problem connected with the inner problems of the administration comes when the dispute leaks into public and it sends over the signals to the foreign governments and partners about the division in the politics. The thesis is divided into three parts. The first part – theoretical - is focused on the actors of American foreign policy and their position within the American political system, their brief history and development which led to the contemporary role in foreign policy. Those are concretely the President, the Secretary of State and the Department of State and the National Security Adviser and National Security Council. In the first part, there are also described the theoretical models which will be used for evaluation of the particular 4 administrations. For that matter, a combination of two types of models is used. The first is the Rosati-Scott model, which has two types - State Department-oriented model and White House-centered model. They focus on the place, where the foreign policy is governed from – either White House or Department of State and the power and influence of the particular advisers. The second type of model is the personal model created by Zbigniew Brzezinski which has three types according to the power of the advisers - Dominant Presidential Leadership (strong National Security Adviser), Dominant Secretary of State and Team arrangement. The second, practical part will be divided into eight chapters and each will be focused on one administration within the given time frame. For the easier orientation, the periods of Presidents, who were in Office for more than one term, will be described as a whole. The same principle will be applied to those administrations where it came to the change of President during the time in Office; they will be discussed in one chapter - concretely administration of Kennedy-Johnson and Nixon-Ford. There will be a small conclusion made at the end of every chapter which will compare the situation within the administration with the pre-set theoretical models. The third part – the conclusion – will sum up all the knowledge and will try to answer the question: How do the interpersonal relations influence the smooth running of the American foreign policy? Even though there were persons with competences to a certain degree comparable to the contemporary National Security Adviser, President Eisenhower was the first one, who appointed the first Adviser officially - Robert Cutler - in 1953. That is why the thesis will begin with the Eisenhower administration and will continue to the administration of George W. Bush. Because of the lack of distance and materials, the current administration of President Obama will not be included into the analysis. 5 AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND IT´S PROCESSES American foreign policy is a tool of the USA which is the most visible from the outside world. Because of the global approach of America, its foreign policy is significant not only for the American people, but for the whole world. When it is spoken about foreign policy, the people usually mean the definitive result, not the process which leads to those results. The process itself is a complicated mix of opinions, bureaucracy, different approaches, personal ties and relationships, interests, planning and ad hoc reactions. Within this process, there are a lot of actors behind the final outputs of policy and their interests and approaches go very often against each other. The number of actors, which are included in contemporary foreign policy process, could also be a limiting factor. Except of the President, there is very often the Vice-president, the National Security Adviser and the National Security Council, the Secretary of State and the Department of State, the Secretary of Defense and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Cinema of Oliver Stone
    Interviews Stone on Stone Between 2010 and 2014 we interviewed Oliver Stone on a number of occasions, either personally or in correspondence by email. He was always ready to engage with us, quite literally. Stone thrives on the cut- and- thrust of debate about his films, about himself and per- ceptions of him that have adorned media outlets around the world throughout his career – and, of course, about the state of America. What follows are transcripts from some of those interviews, with- out redaction. Stone is always at his most fascinating when a ques- tion leads him down a line of theory or thinking that can expound on almost any topic to do with his films, or with the issues in the world at large. Here, that line of thinking appears on the page as he spoke, and gives credence to the notion of a filmmaker who, whether loved or loathed, admired or admonished, is always ready to fight his corner and battle for what he believes is a worthwhile, even noble, cause. Oliver Stone’s career has been defined by battle and the will to overcome criticism and or adversity. The following reflections demonstrate why he remains the most talked about, and combative, filmmaker of his generation. Interview with Oliver Stone, 19 January 2010 In relation to the Classification and Ratings Administration Interviewer: How do you see the issue of cinematic censorship? Oliver Stone: The ratings thing is very much a limited game. If you talk to Joan Graves, you’ll get the facts. The rules are the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US
    Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US The moral cesspool of National Politics Introduction Since leaving a start-up company as a result of the dot-com bust, I have engaged in, among other things, reviewing the literature to try to understand the controversy regarding various, potentially linked, events, including: the murders of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy; Iran-Contra; the PROMIS affair; the October surprise; domestic call-boy—corruption rings; the Panama invasion, and the two Iraq wars. Note: Most people who read the following will find it extremely disturbing, since it shakes our confidence in our basic institutions and leaders. However, I believe that the material below is accurate. It represents a distillation of many books and web references which, though written independently by credible researchers, corroborate each other. Although I have footnoted many of the statements, I chose not to be even more comprehensive to make the document shorter and more readable. It is not enough to just document excesses, though. I plan another white paper to deal with correcting those excesses.1 Initially, two key remedies appear to be: Almost complete transparency in government, and declassification of almost everything over, say, 10 years old. Setting up independent review panels of any federal operations that have the capacity to commit, or allow, significant crimes. Decriminalization of drug possession and distribution. Drug money is funding almost all the illicit activities, and maintaining a web of corruption that is so pervasive that the entire government is dysfunctional2. 1 The revelations in this document are less than a few percent of that convincingly presented in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • At Cold War's End: Complexity, Causes, and Counterfactuals
    THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE At Cold War’s End: Complexity, Causes, and Counterfactuals Benjamin Mueller A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. London, 1 October 2015 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I present for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work, except where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out by any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99,864 words. 2 ABSTRACT What caused the Cold War to end? In the following I examine the puzzle of the fast and peaceful conclusion of the bipolar superpower standoff, and point out the problems this creates for the study of International Relations (IR). I discuss prevailing explanations and point out their gaps, and offer the framework of complexity theory as a suitable complement to overcome the blind spots in IR’s reductionist methodologies. I argue that uncertainty and unpredictability are rooted in an international system that is best viewed as non-linear.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Processus Décisionnel En Politique Étrangère Des États-Unis Lorsque Le
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL LE PROCESSUSS DÉCISIONNEL EN POLITIQUE ÉTRANGÈRE DES ÉTATS­ UNIS LORSQUE LE PRÉSIDENT EST INVALIDE MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PA TIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN SCIENCE POLITIQUE PAR ALEXANDRE ALAOUI OCTOBRE 2015 UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL Service des bibliothèques Avertissement La diffusion de ce mémoire se fait dans le respect des droits de son auteur, qui a signé le formulaire Autorisation de reproduire et de diffuser un travail de recherche de cycles supérieurs (SDU-522 - Rév.01-2006). Cette autorisation stipule que «conformément à l'article 11 du Règlement no 8 des études de cycles supérieurs, [l'auteur] concède à l'Université du Québec à Montréal une licence non exclusive d'utilisation et de publication de la totalité ou d'une partie importante de [son] travail de recherche pour des fins pédagogiques et non commerciales. Plus précisément, [l 'auteur] autorise l'Université du Québec à Montréal à reproduire, diffuser, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de [son] travail de recherche à des fins non commerciales sur quelque support que ce soit, y compris l'Internet. Cette licence et cette autorisation n'entraînent pas une renonciation de [la] part [de l'auteur] à [ses] droits moraux ni à [ses] droits de propriété intellectuelle. Sauf entente contraire, [l 'auteur] conserve la liberté de diffuser et de commercialiser ou non ce travail dont [il] possède un exemplaire.» REMERCIEMENTS Une longue aventure s'achève pour moi. Au cours de ce périple, ma passion pour l'analyse des phénomènes politiques a pu se réaliser. Pour mener à bien cette entreprise, plusieurs personnes ont cru en moi et m'ont offert leur soutien.
    [Show full text]
  • POL5475-40-H11-Gagnon-F
    UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL DÉPARTEMENT DE SCIENCE POLITIQUE HIVER 2011 POL 5475-40 Enjeux politiques contemporains aux États-Unis Jeudi 14:00 à 17:00 Professeur : Frédérick Gagnon [email protected] Local : A-3625 Heures de bureau : jeudi de 17:00 à 18:00 ou sur rendez-vous Téléphone : 514-987-6781 ou 514-987-3000 poste 6603 Auxiliaire d’enseignement : Julie Dufort [email protected] DESCRIPTIF DU COURS (ANNUAIRE DE L’UQAM) Analyse des grands enjeux politiques actuels aux États-Unis. Le cours permet d’étudier : (1) la nature des enjeux et l’évolution des débats les entourant; ainsi que (2) les principaux acteurs sociaux et politiques participant à ces débats, le poids relatif de ces acteurs au sein de la société et leurs stratégies pour influencer la politique. Les enjeux abordés varieront selon l’évolution de la politique intérieure américaine et toucheront à des thèmes comme la réforme des institutions politiques, l’économie, la moralité et la religion, les minorités et l’identité nationale. Préalables : POL-4142 (Système politique des États-Unis) 2 OBJECTIFS DU COURS Connaître les principaux enjeux de politique intérieure aux États-Unis et les débats les entourant Approfondir la connaissance des réalités politiques et sociales américaines en mettant en lumière la pluralité des acteurs influençant celles-ci Développer la capacité d’analyse des réalités politiques américaines à la lumière de l’interaction entre les forces économiques et sociales et les institutions et idéologies politiques aux États-Unis Contribuer à la
    [Show full text]
  • The Trouble with Shadow Government
    Florida International University College of Law eCollections Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 2003 The Trouble With Shadow Government Howard M. Wasserman Florida International University College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, National Security Law Commons, Other Law Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Howard M. Wasserman, The Trouble With Shadow Government , 52 Emory L.J. 281 (2003). Available at: https://ecollections.law.fiu.edu/faculty_publications/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at eCollections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCollections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 52 Emory L.J. 281 2003 Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline (http://heinonline.org) Tue Nov 11 18:05:26 2014 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: https://www.copyright.com/ccc/basicSearch.do? &operation=go&searchType=0 &lastSearch=simple&all=on&titleOrStdNo=0094-4076 THE TROUBLE WITH SHADOW GOVERNMENT Howard M. Wasserman* Presidential succession and government continuity suddenly is a hot topic. The September 11 terrorist attacks and the subsequent War Against Terrorism have brought to the fore the possibility of a catastrophic terrorist attack, perhaps involving small concealed nuclear devices, laying waste to all of Washington, D.C., killing the president and vice president, and destroying Congress and the federal government.
    [Show full text]
  • SANITIZED COPY 2006-11-30-HAI Alexander M
    )I\1'4111LtU \.UrT 2006-11-30-HAI Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Interview Transcription Page 1 of70 30 November 2007 Timothy Naftali General Haig, welcome to the Richard Nixon Presidential Library. This is our first oral history, and we will introduce ourselves and then we'll proceed in this order asking questions. And we look forward to your participation. Thank you, we appreciate it. Alexander Haig I'm delighted to be here, especially for an inaugural like this. I like that term. Timothy Naftali You like that term? John? John Powers I'm John Powers. I'm the supervisory archivist at the Nixon project, and I welcome you. Alexander Haig Good, thank you. Douglas Brinkley I'm Douglas Brinkley, director of the Theodore Roosevelt Center and professor of history at Tulane University in New Orleans. Alexander Haig I know the institution well. Timothy Naftali I'm Tim Naftah, the incoming director of the Richard Nixon Presidential Library. Paul Musgrave And I'm Paul Musgrave. I'm Tim's assistant here at the Nixon materials project. Alexander Haig Very good. DECLASSIFIED IN PART Douglas Brinkley E.O. 13526 AUTHORITY: NLMS 2010-001 By: PMH, NARA; Date: 5/15/2012 Happy birthday, you're getting close. SANITIZED COPY 2006-11-30-HAI Alexander M. Haig, Jr. Interview Transcription Page 2 of70 30 November 2007 Alexander Haig How did you know? Douglas Brinkley I've got your bio. December 2nd coming up. Alexander Haig It's very close. Douglas Brinkley Do you do anything -- Alexander Haig I never thought I'd reach 39.
    [Show full text]
  • American-True-History.Pdf
    “Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it”. — Louis T. McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee -June 10, 1932 - April 11, 1962 1911: A new social pyramid for the industrial age (as presented by The International Workers of the World) The Trail of Blood People Who Opposed the Central Bank The Signers of the Constitution 1776. The War of 1812 against the British (again) We the people of America have escaped THE SIGNERS OF THE CONSTITUTION the Revolutionary War.”- Benjamin Franklin Europe to be free from the Banks. Our The Revolution was fought for Independence forefathers formed armies to protect us from from England’s Central Banking System, Ben Franklin answering a question about the these evil institutions and warned us all of as well as for Freedom from English Taxa- booming economy of the young colonies: the future which would come if we ever let tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Principles and Presidential Succession Howard M
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 90 | Issue 2 Article 4 2001 Structural Principles and Presidential Succession Howard M. Wasserman Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the President/Executive Department Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Wasserman, Howard M. (2001) "Structural Principles and Presidential Succession," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 90 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol90/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Structural Principles and Presidential Succession* BY HOWARD M. WASSERMAN" INTRODUCTION n a way it was like a bloodless coup. In March 1981, President Ronald Reagan was undergoing emergency surgery after being wounded in an assassination attempt, and Vice President George H.W. Bush was outside of Washington. Secretary of State Alexander Haig announced at a White House press briefing, "I am in control here, in the White House," suggesting that, under the Constitution, he was next in the line of succession.' Most White House officials knew Haig was wrong.2 First, and often overlooked, there was, in fact, no vacancy in the vice presidency at that time and no need for Haig, or anyone else, to assume control in the White House; the fact that Vice President Bush was not in Washington did not render him "disabled" from assuming the presidency while Reagan was undergoing surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Film, History and Cultural Memory: Cinematic Representations of Vietnam-Era America During the Culture Wars, 1987-1995
    FILM, HISTORY AND CULTURAL MEMORY: CINEMATIC REPRESENTATIONS OF VIETNAM-ERA AMERICA DURING THE CULTURE WARS, 1987-1995 James Amos Burton, BA, MA. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2007 Abstract My thesis is intended as an intellectual opportunity to take what, I argue, are the “dead ends” of work on the history film in a new direction. I examine cinematic representations of the Vietnam War-era America (1964-1974) produced during the “hot” culture wars (1987-1995). I argue that disagreements among historians and commentators concerning the (mis)representation of history on screen are stymied by either an over- emphasis on factual infidelity, or by dismissal of such concerns as irrelevant. In contradistinction to such approaches, I analyse this group of films in the context of a fluid and negotiated cultural memory. I argue that the consumption of popular films becomes part of a vast intertextual mosaic of remembering and forgetting that is constantly redefining, and reimagining, the past. Representations of history in popular film affect the industrial construction of cultural memory, but Hollywood’s intertextual relay of promotion and accompanying wider media discourses also contributes to a climate in which film impacts upon collective memory. I analyse the films firmly within the discursive moment of their production (the culture wars), the circulating promotional discourses that accompany them, and the always already circulating notions of their subjects. The introduction outlines my methodological approach and provides an overview of the relationship between the twinned discursive moments. Subsequent chapters focus on representations of returning veterans; representations of the counterculture and the anti-war protest movement; and the subjects foregrounded in the biopics of the period.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotel Fire in New York City Early This Morning to Battle a Five-Alarm Fire That Forced Accident in Ohio
    Last body recovered from mine Manchester, Conn. Friday April 17, 1981 REDSTONE, Colo. (UPI) - chances were remote of finding any Rescue teams early today survivors. recovered the last of 15 bodies of The bodies were to be transferred miners trapped more than a mile temporarily to Farnham- underground by a methane gas Rlchardson Mortuary in Glenwood explosion Wednesday. Springs. income Marv Meyers, personnel director “We will be the receiving unit for for the Mid-Continent Coal and Coke the coroner’s office at this point,” Co., said the last body was found In mortician Dave Wagner said. “We .‘i f ; ^ the same general area as the others. will work with the families to see IS rising "The families of the men have what they want to do.” been told to gather at the St. Vince Ayala, whose brother was Stephens Center in Glenwood at among those trapped, said he was WASHINGTON lUPl) - 10:30 this morning,” Meyers said. told all IS were dead. Americans’ personal income rose at “The coroner will meet with them “All of them are dead, all 15,” about a 10 percent compounded an­ to tell them what happens next.” said Avala, who with other relatives nual rate in March, and they con­ Glenwood Springs is 30 miles had kept a night-long vigil around a tinued to put more of it in the bank, north of the Dutch Creek No. 1 mine, fire in a rusty drum on a gravel road the Commerce Department where the bodies of nine miners leading to the mine, “’^a t’s what reported today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR JOHN H. KELLY Interviewed by: Thomas Stern Initial interview date: December 12, 1994 Copyright 1998 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin; raised in Atlanta, Georgia Emory University; Duke University Law School High school teacher Joined Foreign Service in 1964 Adana, Turkey - Vice Consul 1964-1966 General duties Relations with US military Ankara, Turkey - Economic officer 1966-1967 TDY - President Johnson visit to Far East President Johnson's visit to Far East Serving LBJ's needs Duties and rewards Ankara, Turkey - Mutual Security Affairs 1967 Status of Forces Agreements Incherlick military base Dealing with Turkish officialdom US intelligence operations Arab-Israel War (Evacuation/Beirut) - 1967 FSI - Thai language training 1967-1968 Bangkok, Thailand - Political-Military officer 1968-1969 SEATO Laos "invasion" plan US military operations Counter-insurgency efforts 1 Songkhla, Thailand - Principal officer 1969-1971 Communist-led insurgencies US presence in South Thailand Environment Armed Forces Staff College - Norfolk, Virginia 1971-1972 State Department - INR - Office of Strategic Affairs 1972-1973 SALT Duties and issues Bangkok, Thailand - TDY 1973 Department of Defense - Exchange officer 1973-1974 SEATO-Thailand James Schlesinger (Secretary of Defense) Kissinger and State vs. DOD Military "politics" State Department - Political-Military Affairs 1974 SALT negotiations State Department - Special Assistant
    [Show full text]