Nuclear Weapons Security Crises: Henry D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nuclear Weapons Security Crises: Henry D What Does History Teach? Nuclear Weapons Security Crises: NUCLEARNUCLEAR WEAPONSWEAPONS SECURITYSECURITY CRISES:CRISES: WHATWHAT DOESDOES HISTORYHISTORY TEACH?TEACH? U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE Visit our website for other free publication downloads Henry D. Sokolski http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ Bruno Tertrais To rate this publication click here. Editors Bruno Tertrais Henry D. Sokolski Editors This Publication SSI Website USAWC Website Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press NUCLEAR WEAPONS SECURITY CRISES: WHAT DOES HISTORY TEACH? Henry D. Sokolski Bruno Tertrais Editors July 2013 The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. Authors of Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) and U.S. Army War College (USAWC) Press publications enjoy full academic freedom, provided they do not disclose classified information, jeopardize operations security, or misrepresent official U.S. policy. Such academic freedom empowers them to offer new and sometimes controversial perspectives in the inter- est of furthering debate on key issues. This report is cleared for public release; distribution is unlimited. ***** This publication is subject to Title 17, United States Code, Sections 101 and 105. It is in the public domain and may not be copyrighted. ***** Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to: Director, Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, U.S. Army War College, 47 Ashburn Drive, Carlisle, PA 17013-5010. ***** All Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) and U.S. Army War College (USAWC) Press publications may be downloaded free of charge from the SSI website. Hard copies of this report may also be obtained free of charge while supplies last by placing an order on the SSI website. SSI publications may be quoted or reprinted in part or in full with permission and appropriate credit given to the U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, PA. Contact SSI by visiting our website at the following address: www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil. ***** The Strategic Studies Institute and USAWC Press publishes a monthly email newsletter to update the national security community on the research of our analysts, recent and forthcoming publications, and upcoming conferences sponsored by the Institute. Each newsletter also provides a strategic com- mentary by one of our research analysts. If you are interested in receiving this newsletter, please subscribe on the SSI website at www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/newsletter. ISBN 1-58487-574-7 ii CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................v Henry D. Sokolski and Bruno Tertrais Preface...........................................................................vii Henry D. Sokolski Introduction 1. The Unexpected Risk: The Impact of Political Crises on the Security and Control of Nuclear Weapons ................................3 Bruno Tertrais Part I: Case Studies 2. A “Nuclear Coup”? France, the Algerian War, and the April 1961 Nuclear Test ...............25 Bruno Tertrais 3. Securing Nuclear Arsenals: A Chinese Case Study .............................................................65 Mark A. Stokes 4. Controlling Soviet/Russian Nuclear Weapons in Times of Instability .........................87 Nikolai Sokov 5. Political Transitions and Nuclear Management in Pakistan ...................................145 Feroz Hassan Khan iii Part II: Lessons Learned 6. The Conundrum of Close Calls: Lessons Learned for Securing Nuclear Weapons ...............................................................191 Reid B.C. Pauly and Scott D. Sagan 7. Nuclear Command and Control in Crisis: Old Lessons from New History ........................205 Peter D. Feaver 8. Securing Nuclear Arsenals in Times of Political Turmoil: “Top 10” Lessons Learned .................................................227 Gregory F. Giles 9. Beyond Crises: The Unending Challenge of Controlling Nuclear Weapons and Materials ...................................................... 253 Matthew Bunn About the Contributors ............................................ 279 iv FOREWORD This volume is the 16th in a series of edited vol- umes of contracted research the Nonproliferation Pol- icy Education Center (NPEC) has published in coop- eration with the Strategic Studies Institute of the U.S. Army War College. It is the product of a joint effort between NPEC and Bruno Tertrais of the Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique. The volume features research done over the past 2 years. This work addresses the possibility of nuclear weapons and materials falling into the hands of unauthorized actors during political crises. It uses specific historical case studies as the basis from which to draw lessons for the future. Fund- ing for this project came from the Carnegie Cor- poration of New York, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Much of the work to prepare the book for publi- cation was done by NPEC’s research associate, Kate Harrison, and the staff of the Strategic Studies Insti- tute, especially Dr. James Pierce and Rita Rummel. This book would not have been possible without their help. Finally, we owe heartfelt thanks to the project’s authors and reviewers, who contributed their time and ideas. HENRY D. SOKOLSKI Executive Director The Nonproliferation Policy Education Center BRUNO TERTRAIS Senior Research Fellow Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique v PREFACE NUCLEAR SECURITY HISTORY: WHY IT COMMANDS OUR ATTENTION Of all the projects my center, the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (NPEC), has undertaken, none has generated as much high-level attention as the contents of this volume—four histories of disturbingly close calls when governments came close to losing control of their nuclear arsenals during political crises. Certainly, the number and seniority of current and for- mer officials attending the rollout of this research by my center and the Fondation pour la Recherche Straté- gique was impressive: an Assistant Secretary of State; the national intelligence officer in charge of Southwest Asia; a former International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) deputy director for safeguards; two former members of the National Security Council; and sev- eral senior staffers from State, Defense, Energy, and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The officials’ interest in these histories is under- standable. Accounts of nuclear security crises that have taken place outside of the United States have gen- erally been cloaked in secrecy. Also, the drama associ- ated with these crises is significant. At the height of the Cultural Revolution, a Chinese long-range nuclear missile was fired within the country, and the nuclear warhead it was carrying detonated. A French nuclear device was exploded in Algeria during a coup. When the Soviet empire collapsed, shots were fired at a Rus- sian crowd intent on rushing a nuclear weapons-laden plane straining to remove a stash of nuclear weapons to a safer locale. Pakistani governments have been routinely pushed aside by a powerful nuclear-armed vii military. But expert observers worry that in the future, Pakistan’s powerful military might be divided against itself or held hostage by some faction that seizes con- trol of some portion of Pakistan’s nuclear assets. How could one not be interested to learn more? Yet, for all of this, it is unclear just what these sto- ries teach. It certainly would be a mistake to assume that they impart a list of specific policy prescriptions. With each case—the Algerian coup of 1961, the col- lapse of the Soviet Union, the Chinese Cultural Revo- lution, and the series of Pakistani crises dating back to the 1980s—the circumstances were so unique it is difficult to draw recommendations that would be very useful today. The reasons why are nonintuitive. First, the tech- nical challenges each government encountered and the fixes they employed to maintain control over their arsenals were not only different in each instance, but arguably unique to the era when the crisis occurred. Whatever specific technical solution a government might have employed to prevent a past nuclear secu- rity crisis, then, is not necessarily the one another gov- ernment would be advised to use today. Second, and far more important, each and every nuclear security crisis is and will always be driven by a unique set of human actors, individuals, or groups whose thoughts and intentions, both then and now, are largely beyond anyone’s ability to pre- cisely pin down. This presents an immediate histori- cal challenge: How does one determine or prove what key individuals thought or intended to do in the past when it may be in their interest now to embellish or lie? This matters enormously, since no matter how “secure” one tries to make nuclear weapons assets procedurally or technically, individuals with enough viii authority or access can elect to override or find ways around such protections. The political and organiza- tional solutions employed successfully in the past, therefore, may or may not work in the future. Such uncertainty is bewildering, because enhanc- ing the nuclear security of existing nuclear weapons arsenals and nuclear weapons-usable materials and plants is a high priority. Hundreds of tons of military and civilian nuclear weapons-usable materials are added to the world’s
Recommended publications
  • GOVT-PUNJAB Waitinglist Nphs.Pdf
    WAITING LIST SUMMARY DATE & TIME 20-04-2021 02:21:11 PM BALLOT CATEGORY GOVT-PUNJAB TOTAL WAITING APPLICANTS 8711 WAITING LIST OF APPLICANTS S No. Receipt ID Applicant Name Father Name CNIC 1 27649520 SHABAN ALI MUHAMMAD ABBAS ADIL 3520106922295 2 27649658 Waseem Abbas Qalab Abbas 3520113383737 3 27650644 Usman Hiader Sajid Abbasi 3650156358657 4 27651140 Adil Baig Ghulam Sarwar 3520240247205 5 27652673 Nadeem Akhtar Muhammad Mumtaz 4220101849351 6 27653461 Imtiaz Hussain Zaidi Shasmshad Hussain Zaidi 3110116479593 7 27654564 Bilal Hussain Malik tasadduq Hussain 3640261377911 8 27658485 Zahid Nazir Nazir Ahmed 3540173750321 9 27659188 Muhammad Bashir Hussain Muhammad Siddique 3520219305241 10 27659190 IFTIKHAR KHAN SHER KHAN 3520226475101 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Director Housing-XII (LDAC NPA) Director Finance Director IT (I&O) Chief Town Planner Note: This Ballot is conducted by PITB on request of DG LDA. PITB is not responsible for any data Anomalies. Ballot Type: GOVT-PUNJAB Date&time : Tuesday, Apr 20, 2021 02:21 PM Page 1 of 545 WAITING LIST OF APPLICANTS S No. Receipt ID Applicant Name Father Name CNIC 11 27659898 Maqbool Ahmad Muhammad Anar Khan 3440105267405 12 27660478 Imran Yasin Muhammad Yasin 3540219620181 13 27661528 MIAN AZIZ UR REHMAN MUHAMMAD ANWAR 3520225181377 14 27664375 HINA SHAHZAD MUHAMMAD SHAHZAD ARIF 3520240001944 15 27664446 SAIRA JABEEN RAZA ALI 3110205697908 16 27664597 Maded Ali Muhammad Boota 3530223352053 17 27664664 Muhammad Imran MUHAMMAD ANWAR 3520223937489
    [Show full text]
  • The Cinema of Oliver Stone
    Interviews Stone on Stone Between 2010 and 2014 we interviewed Oliver Stone on a number of occasions, either personally or in correspondence by email. He was always ready to engage with us, quite literally. Stone thrives on the cut- and- thrust of debate about his films, about himself and per- ceptions of him that have adorned media outlets around the world throughout his career – and, of course, about the state of America. What follows are transcripts from some of those interviews, with- out redaction. Stone is always at his most fascinating when a ques- tion leads him down a line of theory or thinking that can expound on almost any topic to do with his films, or with the issues in the world at large. Here, that line of thinking appears on the page as he spoke, and gives credence to the notion of a filmmaker who, whether loved or loathed, admired or admonished, is always ready to fight his corner and battle for what he believes is a worthwhile, even noble, cause. Oliver Stone’s career has been defined by battle and the will to overcome criticism and or adversity. The following reflections demonstrate why he remains the most talked about, and combative, filmmaker of his generation. Interview with Oliver Stone, 19 January 2010 In relation to the Classification and Ratings Administration Interviewer: How do you see the issue of cinematic censorship? Oliver Stone: The ratings thing is very much a limited game. If you talk to Joan Graves, you’ll get the facts. The rules are the rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US
    Murder, Arrogance of Power, and the Struggle for Social Dominance in the US The moral cesspool of National Politics Introduction Since leaving a start-up company as a result of the dot-com bust, I have engaged in, among other things, reviewing the literature to try to understand the controversy regarding various, potentially linked, events, including: the murders of John Kennedy, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy; Iran-Contra; the PROMIS affair; the October surprise; domestic call-boy—corruption rings; the Panama invasion, and the two Iraq wars. Note: Most people who read the following will find it extremely disturbing, since it shakes our confidence in our basic institutions and leaders. However, I believe that the material below is accurate. It represents a distillation of many books and web references which, though written independently by credible researchers, corroborate each other. Although I have footnoted many of the statements, I chose not to be even more comprehensive to make the document shorter and more readable. It is not enough to just document excesses, though. I plan another white paper to deal with correcting those excesses.1 Initially, two key remedies appear to be: Almost complete transparency in government, and declassification of almost everything over, say, 10 years old. Setting up independent review panels of any federal operations that have the capacity to commit, or allow, significant crimes. Decriminalization of drug possession and distribution. Drug money is funding almost all the illicit activities, and maintaining a web of corruption that is so pervasive that the entire government is dysfunctional2. 1 The revelations in this document are less than a few percent of that convincingly presented in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Dia a Dia Sara Masó I Carme Tejeiro
    DIA A DIA SARA MASÓ I CARME TEJEIRO NOVEMBRE 2001 solidaritat amb els Estats Units amb motiu dels Admira. Els responsables del grup assenyalen 2 DE NOVEMBRE terribles atemptats que ha sofert. Tampoc que "s'estudia la possibilitat d'entrar en suposa que modifiquem la nostra condició l'accionariat de la plataforma de televisió EL CAC ESPERA UNA BONA LLEI d'enemics expressos i frontals dels terroristes, digital Quiero» L'entrada a Quiero podria ser un PER A LA CCRTV de tots els terroristes, i del règim talibà que primer pas per a una unió entre Via Digital i El de president del Consell de l'Audiovisual protegeix Bin Laden." I conclou: "però no Canal Satélite Digital. Catalunya, Francesc Codina, manifesta no sen¬ podem acceptar que la lògica actuació contra tir-se preocupat pel retard que afecta aquest adversari es faci amb bombardeigs que POLÈMICA JUDICIAL PER UNA l'aprovació de la nova Llei de la Corporació afecten una població civil no responsable de INDEMNITZACIÓ A PREYSLER Catalana de Ràdio i Televisió (CCRTV) sempre les decisions del fonamentalisme que ha Una denúncia d'Isabel Preysler contra la revista que el resultat final ofereixi "un bon projecte" i conquistat el poder en el país." Lecturas ha causat polèmica entre el Tribunal la normativa aprovada "sigui bona". La Comissió Suprem i el Constitucional. Un article de la revis¬ Parlamentària per a la reforma de l'esmentada KABUL ALLIBERA EL PERIODISTA ta havia publicat que Preysler tenia "grans a la llei no s'ha reunit des d'abans de l'estiu. DE PARIS MATCH cara".
    [Show full text]
  • Monde.20011122.Pdf
    EN ÎLE-DE-FRANCE a Dans « aden » : tout le cinéma et une sélection de sorties Demandez notre supplément www.lemonde.fr 57e ANNÉE – Nº 17674 – 7,90 F - 1,20 EURO FRANCE MÉTROPOLITAINE -- JEUDI 22 NOVEMBRE 2001 FONDATEUR : HUBERT BEUVE-MÉRY – DIRECTEUR : JEAN-MARIE COLOMBANI Afghanistan : les débats de l’après-guerre b Quels étaient les buts de la guerre, quel rôle pour les humanitaires ? b « Le Monde » donne la parole à des intellectuels et à des ONG b Conférence à Berlin sur l’avenir de l’Afghanistan, sous l’égide de l’ONU b Le reportage de notre envoyée spéciale en territoire taliban SOMMAIRE formation d’un gouvernement pluriethnique. Les islamistes étran- BRUNO BOUDJELAL/VU b Guerre éclair, doute persistant : gers de Kunduz encerclée risquent Dans un cahier spécial de huit d’être massacrés. Kaboul retrouve a REPORTAGE pages, Le Monde donne la parole à le goût des petites libertés, mais un spécialiste du droit d’ingéren- une manifestation de femmes a ce, Mario Bettati, et à deux person- été interdite. Notre envoyée spé- Une petite ville nalités de l’humanitaire, Rony ciale en territoire taliban, Françoi- Brauman et Sylvie Brunel. Ils disent se Chipaux, a rencontré des popula- leur gêne ou leur inquiétude tions déplacées qui redoutent l’Al- POINTS DE VUE en Algérie devant le rôle que les Etats-Unis liance du Nord. p. 2 et 3 font jouer aux ONG. Des intellec- L’ÉCRIVAIN François Maspero tuels français, Robert Redeker, b La coalition et l’humanitaire : Le Cahier a passé le mois d’août dans une Jean Clair, Daniel Bensaïd et Willy Pentagone compte sur l’Alliance petite ville de la côte algéroise.
    [Show full text]
  • Childrensmediaconferencerepo
    Conference Report Children’s Media Conference 15th -20th December’2014 Conference was organized by; In collaboration with; www.thelittleart.org Conference Report | Children’s Media Network, Pakistan | The Little Art| www.thelittleart.org 1 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Conference Objectives ............................................................................................................................. 4 Session Details ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Implications - Findings/Outcomes of the Networking Conference ....................................... 12 Children’s Media Network ................................................................................................................... 13 Strategic Plan ........................................................................................................................................... 16 Strategic Framework ............................................................................................................................. 18 Conference Report | Children’s Media Network, Pakistan | The Little Art| www.thelittleart.org 2 Introduction “Children’s Media Conference”–The project is initiated by The Little Art with a vision to promote Children’s Media in Pakistan. Through this project we aimed to carry out
    [Show full text]
  • US Nuclear War Plan
    THE U.S. NUCLEAR WAR PLAN: A TIME FOR CHANGE Authors Matthew G. McKinzie Thomas B. Cochran Robert S. Norris William M. Arkin Natural Resources Defense Council June 2001 Natural Resources Defense Council ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Natural Resources Defense Council and the authors wish to acknowledge the generous support and encouragement given to the NRDC Nuclear Program’s Nuclear War Plans Project by The William Bingham Foundation, the HKH Foundation, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The John Merck Fund, The Prospect Hill Foundation, the Ploughshares Fund, and the W. Alton Jones Foundation. We also wish to thank the 500,000 members of NRDC, without whom our work would not be possible. Many individuals and institutions have assisted in the preparation of this report. The lead author, Matthew G. McKinzie, worked primarily on developing and integrating the software for the analysis of Major Attack Option-Nuclear Forces (MAO-NF). The most important computer software that we used was the Geographic Information System (GIS) program. ArcView was generously provided to NRDC under a grant by the Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI). The University of Florida Department of Urban and Regional Planning assisted in customizing the ArcView program to fit NRDC requirements. We are particularly indebted to Dr. Ilir Bejleri for his assistance in software programming and file management. Dr. J. Davis Lambert assisted in this work, as did Professor John Alexander who provided management oversight as principal investi- gator under the contract with the University of Florida. The extensive targeting and related databases were developed primarily by Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • Bum Dope, Blowback, and the Bomb: the Effect of Bad Information on Policy-Maker Beliefs and Crisis Stability
    Chapter 8 Bum Dope, Blowback, and the Bomb: The Effect of Bad Information on Policy-Maker Beliefs and Crisis Stability Jeffrey Lewis How might bad information affect crisis stability? We like to imag- ine that elites—military offi cials, politicians, and experts—will be immune to the kind of rumor, disinformation, and propaganda with which the internet is awash. This chapter explores that notion, with a nod to political scientist Stephen Van Evera’s notion of blowback—the idea that propaganda can, in fact, warp elite perceptions. Van Evera was concerned about psychological blurring between rhetoric and sin- cere belief while others, like Jack Snyder, another expert on interna- tional relations, emphasized the risk that policy makers might become trapped by political rhetoric.1 This chapter is principally concerned with this idea: that bad infor- mation, even deliberate disinformation knowingly planted by some cyn- ical elites, might “blow back” (or echo) through a wider range of elites and worsen a nuclear crisis. It examines two contemporary case studies of bad information, both of which help illustrate how such informa- tion—to use George P. Shultz’s colorful phrase, “bum dope”—could undermine crisis stability.2 I conclude that the same pathologies seen in online discourse could undermine stability, even in a serious crisis involving nuclear weapons. In short, policy makers tend to engage in public rhetoric that, in turn, shapes their own thinking. Often such statements are propagandistic in their initial formulation. But as they become part of the public dis- course, policy makers tend to believe them. This carries additional risk HH7667-Trinkunas.indb7667-Trinkunas.indb 115959 11/17/20/17/20 88:49:49 AAMM 160 JEFFREY LEWIS in an era of social media.
    [Show full text]
  • At Cold War's End: Complexity, Causes, and Counterfactuals
    THE LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE At Cold War’s End: Complexity, Causes, and Counterfactuals Benjamin Mueller A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics and Political Science for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. London, 1 October 2015 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I present for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work, except where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out by any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 99,864 words. 2 ABSTRACT What caused the Cold War to end? In the following I examine the puzzle of the fast and peaceful conclusion of the bipolar superpower standoff, and point out the problems this creates for the study of International Relations (IR). I discuss prevailing explanations and point out their gaps, and offer the framework of complexity theory as a suitable complement to overcome the blind spots in IR’s reductionist methodologies. I argue that uncertainty and unpredictability are rooted in an international system that is best viewed as non-linear.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Page 1 of 23
    Afghanistan Page 1 of 23 Afghanistan Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2001 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 4, 2002 Afghanistan has experienced civil war and political instability for 22 years. There was no functioning central government, until December 22, 2001 when the Afghan Interim Administration (AIA) took office. During most of the year, the Taliban, a Pashtun-dominated ultra-conservative Islamic movement, controlled approximately 90 percent of the country, including the capital of Kabul, and all major urban areas, except Faizabad. In 1997 the Taliban issued an edict renaming the country the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, and named its leader, Mullah Omar, Head of State and Commander of the Faithful, granting him ultimate authority. Omar headed the inner Shura (Council), located in the southern city of Kandahar. The Taliban's power structure reportedly narrowed during the year, and its principal consultative bodies, the Shuras, reportedly no longer functioned. Until October 7, a rival regime, the Islamic State of Afghanistan (generally known as the Northern Alliance or United Front), which nominally was headed by former Afghanistan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, an ethnic Tajik, controlled about 10 percent of the country. Rabbani and his chief military commander, Ahmed Shah Masood, for most of the year, controlled the majority Tajik areas in the country's extreme northeast. The Rabbani regime controlled most of the country's embassies and retained Afghanistan's U.N. seat after the U.N. General Assembly again deferred a decision on Afghanistan's credentials. A number of provincial administrations maintained limited functions, but civil institutions were rudimentary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sartorius Christopher Ma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WARNING INTELLIGENCE IN NUCLEAR CRISIS MANAGEMENT: AVOIDING CATASTROPHIC MISCALCULATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By CHRISTOPHER M. SARTORIUS Norman, OK 2018 WARNING INTELLIGENCE IN NUCLEAR CRISIS MANAGMENT: AVOIDING CATASTROPHIC MISCALCULATION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ___________________________ Dr. Ronald K. Gaddie, Chair ___________________________ Dr. Colin M. Barry ___________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ___________________________ Dr. Jorge L. Mendoza ___________________________ Dr. Shad B. Satterthwaite © Copyright by CHRISTOPHER M. SARTORIUS 2018 All Rights Reserved. This dissertation is dedicated to my family and all intelligence professionals, military and civilian, past and present, who have dedicated their lives to protecting our great nation and our allies. Acknowledgements Working on this doctoral dissertation has been both a joy and a challenge. This work would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of countless individuals. At the most personal level, I would like to thank my wife, Fulvia, for her support over the past three years of this doctoral program and for her care and love over the past 25 years. I wish to thank my son, Konrad, for providing inspiration, much needed breaks in my work routine, and for sharing lunch together at the OU cafeteria followed by our fun table tennis matches. I also would like to thank my parents, Tim and Wanda Sartorius, for instilling in me the value of a great education. I would also like to thank Dr. Shad Satterthwaite, always friendly, open, and upbeat for enthusiastically encouraging me to pursue a doctoral degree at OU and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Robinson
    To: Bill Robinson <[email protected]> From: "Howard W. Hallman" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Canadian churches and abolition Cc: Bcc: X-Attachments: At 12:43 PM 11/16/98 -0500, Bill Robinson wrote: >Dear Howard - > >Project Ploughshares, which is a project of the Canadian Council of >Churches, is considering the feasibility of organizing some kind of >outreach project between Canadian church leaders and church leaders in >other countries on the subject of nuclear abolition.... December 1, 1998 Dear Bill, I've been hanging onto your communication of November 16 about getting the Canadian Council of Churches to reach out to other countries on nuclear abolition. Since my response is somewhat complex, I'm just getting around to replying. Basically it's a good idea. Because the Canadian government is questioning some of the cold war assumptions about nuclear deterrence and has led the way in land mines, it would be useful for Canadian religious bodies to provide similar world leadership within the religious community. As you may recall, I initiated an effort related to the 1998 session of the NPT Preparatory Committee in Geneva that (1) produced a statement to delegates from Dr. Konrad Raiser, general secretary of the World Council of Churches, and Godried Cardinal Danneels, president of Pax Christi International, (2) sponsored a reception for delegates co-hosted by Dr. Raiser and Cardinal Danneels, and (3) developed a presentation to delegates on spiritual and moral values. I'm sending separately the Raiser-Danneels statement with some endorsers. I can send you the presentation to delegates if you want it.
    [Show full text]