DOCSLIB.ORG

Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis CONGRESSIONAL PROGRAM Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis March 2-4, 2018 Stanford, California Copyright @ 2018 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute 2300 N Street Northwest Washington, DC 20037 Published in the United States of America in 2018 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Pub # 18/006 Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis March 2-4, 2018 The Aspen Institute Congressional Program Table of Contents Rapporteur’s Summary Elliot Serbin ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis: Historical Context ......................................... 13 Kathleen Stephens What We Really Know About North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons, And What We Don’t Yet Know for Sure .................................................................................................... 17 Siegfried Hecker DPRK National Strategic Considerations, Objectives ............................................................................... 21 Sue Mi Terry Former Defense Secretary William Perry on why we didn't go to war with North Korea ........................................................................................... 37 Barbara Demick Sanctions on North Korea ........................................................................................................................... 39 Marcus Noland The Price of War With North Korea ........................................................................................................... 47 Barry Posen The Korean Missile Crisis: Why Deterrence Is Still the Best Option ..................................................................................................... 49 Scott Sagan New Thinking to Solve the North Korean Nuclear Conundrum ................................................................. 57 Fan Gaoyue Setting a Timetable for Denuclearization of North Korea .......................................................................... 59 Fan Gaoyue A View from China on Triangular Relations .............................................................................................. 63 Wang Dong Making Sense of North Korea [with Admiral Dennis Blair and Ambassador Chris Hill] ........................................................................... 73 Susan Glasser Can We Still Negotiate with North Korea? A South Korean Perspective ....................................................................................................................... 89 Chung-in Moon Moon’s Bet on the Olympics: What Comes Next? ..................................................................................................................................... 97 Gi-Wook Shin and Joyce Lee North Korea in 2017: Closer to Being a Nuclear State .................................................................................................................. 99 Gi-Wook Shin and Reggie J. Moon Trump Should Help North Korea Keep Its Nukes Safe ............................................................................ 107 Michael Auslin Can Kim Jong-un Control His Nukes? ..................................................................................................... 113 Michael Auslin Trump’s Biggest North Korea Mistake Is Coming ................................................................................... 117 Michael Auslin How Trump Should Talk to North Korea ................................................................................................. 121 Suzanne DiMaggio and Joel S. Wit The Art of Diplomacy: Key Aspects of a Potential Agreement ..................................................................................................... 123 David Straub Conference Agenda .................................................................................................................................. 127 Conference Participants ........................................................................................................................... 133 Finding a Diplomatic Solution to the North Korean Crisis Rapporteur’s Summary Elliot Serbin Research Assistant to Professor Siegfried Hecker Center for International Security and Cooperation (CISAC) Stanford University The views expressed here are not the author’s, rather the rapporteur’s effort to reflect the discussion. *** Introduction Following North Korean leader Kim Jong-un’s surprise overture to South Korea in his 2018 Under the auspices of the Aspen Institute New Year’s Address, South and North Korea Congressional Program, a bipartisan group of undertook diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions thirteen members of Congress convened from during the 2018 Winter Olympics in March 2 to March 5, 2018, at Stanford Pyeongchang, South Korea. Subsequently, University to discuss policy options regarding South Korea dispatched special envoys to meet the current North Korea crisis. The members of with Kim Jong-un in Pyongyang, North Korea. Congress deliberated with scholars and Aspen meeting participants discussed whether practitioners to acquire a better understanding of the inter-Korean dialogue had provided a North Korea and its ruling regime and regional window of opportunity for the U.S. to actors, assess the range of potential solutions to successfully engage with North Korea. [On the crisis, and determine the role of Congress on March 8th, three days after this meeting, this issue. President Trump provided his own answer to that question when he accepted Kim Jong-un’s The participants were mindful that the state of proposal to meet.] Kim Jong-un reportedly affairs on the Korean Peninsula remains fraught. conveyed to South Korean envoys a willingness The U.S. has continued its “maximum pressure” to discuss denuclearization in a dialogue with campaign against North Korea in an effort to the U.S. and agreed to a moratorium on nuclear isolate the country and force it to adjust its and missile testing for the duration of talks. As strategic calculus in favor of denuclearization. the U.S. and North Korea prepare for a possible Despite this pressure campaign, North Korea has Trump-Kim summit by the end of May, thoughts continued its determined effort to develop its and reflections from the Aspen meeting nuclear and missile programs, conducting its contained herein may help to inform U.S. policy sixth nuclear test and first ICBM tests in 2017. as it tackles these new developments. American officials have cautioned that time is running out, explaining that diplomacy is Understanding North Korea under the Kim preferred but military options remain on the Jong-un Regime table. Throughout the meeting, members of Congress expressed great interest in learning more about 3 the notoriously closed society of North Korea. because it diverts and consumes scarce The conversation often returned to questions resources. One participant concluded that North about Kim Jong-un’s personality, the political Korea would not be able to pursue both tracks objectives of his regime, and the nature of daily simultaneously and would continue to jump life in North Korea. back and forth between the two. Participants stressed that we know very little The discussion also touched on the current state about what Kim Jong-un actually wants, how he of the North Korean economy. Participants thinks, and how he would react in various explained how it was decimated by the Korean scenarios. Judgments about him and his goals War, rebuilt with the help of the Soviet Union, are based on speculation. A number of and suffered in the 1990s following a reduction participants suggested, however, that it is in foreign economic aid. North Korea endured a relatively safe to assume that Kim Jong-un is a famine in the 1990s, which gave rise to small rational actor. At the same time, he may be scale working units engaging in entrepreneurial locked in a poor information environment and behavior to procure food. The limited surrounded by “yes-men”, which could impair marketization of some elements of the North his decision-making process. Korean economy has not been a top-down process, though Kim Jong-un has relaxed certain Participants discussed a “theory of dictatorship” policies to allow for some market activity. In as a lens through which to understand Kim Jong- recent years, the economy has generated greater un. One participant posited that if Kim Jong-un inequality and the general population continues is like other dictators, he is not crazy but in fact to suffer from a chronic lack of food. The North intelligent, capable, and bold. Furthermore, it is Korean people are in survival mode, but hope likely that eventually he will overreach that the limited economic reforms will provide externally, sparking a conflict. Another some opportunity. participant pushed back against this theory, arguing that while dictators are horrible to their North Korea’s Nuclear Capabilities own people, they don’t always spark external conflagrations. This participant did not think that Participants reviewed the present state of North war with North Korea would be inevitable, but Korea’s nuclear capabilities given its significant expressed concerns that the theory of advancements in 2017. According to one dictatorship made war falsely appear participant, North Korea has demonstrated the unavoidable. capability to produce fissile material in the form of plutonium and highly
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sung Kim by Andy Lim
    Sung Kim By Andy Lim Who is he? Sung Kim recently became the new Special Representative for North Korea Policy and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Korea and Japan on November 2014. Previously he served as the Ambassador of the United States to the Republic of Korea from November 2011 to August of 2014, where he became the first Korean-American ever to serve in that position. At the end of his tenure in the ROK, he received the Order of Diplomatic Service Merit Medal (Gwanghwa Medal) from President Park Geun-hye and an honorary citizenship from Seoul in recognition of his services to improving bilateral ties between the U.S. and the ROK. A career foreign service officer, he was appointed the Special Envoy for the Six-Party Talks in July 2008 with the rank of Ambassador. During his career, he has served as the head of the Department of State’s Office of Korean Affairs (2006-2008), the Political-Military Unit Chief at the U.S. Embassy in Seoul (2002-2006), a Political Officer in Tokyo (1999-2002), as well as assignments in Kuala Lumpur and Hong Kong. His assignments in Washington included serving as a desk officer in the Office of Chinese Affairs, and as a Staff Assistant in the Bureau of East Asia and Pacific Affairs. Before his diplomatic career, he worked as a public prosecutor in the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office. Originally from Seoul, South Korea, Ambassador Kim moved to Los Angeles when he was young. He received his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania, a J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Trends 3 Article 2
    2 An Unlikely Bromance: Trump, Duterte and the Future of the Philippine-U.S. Alliance | RICHARD JAVAD HEYDARIAN The Philippines Welcomes Trump’s you live long!) and, half-jokingly, reassured Presidency Obama’s successor that he wished not to “fight [with America anymore] because With few exceptions, the unlikely electoral Trump is there.”1 There were at least three victory of Donald Trump came as an reasons that made Duterte optimistic unpleasant shock to many capitals across about his relations with post-Obama the world. Most countries, including America. key allies, such as Japan, expected a comfortable victory for the Democratic First of all, he felt a semblance of candidate, Hillary Clinton -- a well-known ideological affinity and temperamental political entity to the global elite and rapport with his populist American broader policy community. The Philippines, counterpart, who launched an electoral America’s oldest ally in Asia, was among the and political insurgency against the liberal few nations, in addition to Israel, Russia and establishment in America, which has India, where the news of Trump’s victory been highly critical of Duterte and his elicited a cautiously optimistic response human rights record. In particular, Duterte from the political leadership, specifically expected the Trump administration to under the controversial president Rodrigo take a softer and more pragmatic stance Duterte, previously dubbed by Western on democracy and human rights issues. media as the “Trump of the East.” Shortly After all, as Trump said
    [Show full text]
  • Bum Dope, Blowback, and the Bomb: the Effect of Bad Information on Policy-Maker Beliefs and Crisis Stability
    Chapter 8 Bum Dope, Blowback, and the Bomb: The Effect of Bad Information on Policy-Maker Beliefs and Crisis Stability Jeffrey Lewis How might bad information affect crisis stability? We like to imag- ine that elites—military offi cials, politicians, and experts—will be immune to the kind of rumor, disinformation, and propaganda with which the internet is awash. This chapter explores that notion, with a nod to political scientist Stephen Van Evera’s notion of blowback—the idea that propaganda can, in fact, warp elite perceptions. Van Evera was concerned about psychological blurring between rhetoric and sin- cere belief while others, like Jack Snyder, another expert on interna- tional relations, emphasized the risk that policy makers might become trapped by political rhetoric.1 This chapter is principally concerned with this idea: that bad infor- mation, even deliberate disinformation knowingly planted by some cyn- ical elites, might “blow back” (or echo) through a wider range of elites and worsen a nuclear crisis. It examines two contemporary case studies of bad information, both of which help illustrate how such informa- tion—to use George P. Shultz’s colorful phrase, “bum dope”—could undermine crisis stability.2 I conclude that the same pathologies seen in online discourse could undermine stability, even in a serious crisis involving nuclear weapons. In short, policy makers tend to engage in public rhetoric that, in turn, shapes their own thinking. Often such statements are propagandistic in their initial formulation. But as they become part of the public dis- course, policy makers tend to believe them. This carries additional risk HH7667-Trinkunas.indb7667-Trinkunas.indb 115959 11/17/20/17/20 88:49:49 AAMM 160 JEFFREY LEWIS in an era of social media.
    [Show full text]
  • North Korea Under Kim Il-Sung" (2015)
    Arcadia University ScholarWorks@Arcadia Senior Capstone Theses Undergraduate Research Spring 2015 Cult of Personality: North Korea under Kim Il- Sung Tyler Lutz Arcadia University, [email protected] Arcadia University has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits ouy . Your story matters. Thank you. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.arcadia.edu/senior_theses Part of the History Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Lutz, Tyler, "Cult of Personality: North Korea under Kim Il-Sung" (2015). Senior Capstone Theses. Paper 10. This Capstone is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Research at ScholarWorks@Arcadia. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Capstone Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@Arcadia. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Tyler Lutz History Senior Seminar Senior Thesis Paper Cult of Personality: North Korea under Kim Il-Sung Lutz 1 North Korea, The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, or “The Hermit Kingdom” as it is occasionally referred to, is the most isolated country in the world today. Its people have lived under the dictatorial rule of the world’s only dynastic communist regime, that of the Kim family for over half a century. The country is highly militaristic, highly idealistic, and always appears to be on the edge of instigating a new conflict in the region. The country itself is relatively young, having only split from the South immediately following World War II. Up until that point, Korea had been a unified nation for over 1100 years. Their history was for the most part peaceful and stable, until the late 19 th century when increasing pressures from the West and the Japanese forced Korea to open up to the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Sartorius Christopher Ma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE WARNING INTELLIGENCE IN NUCLEAR CRISIS MANAGEMENT: AVOIDING CATASTROPHIC MISCALCULATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By CHRISTOPHER M. SARTORIUS Norman, OK 2018 WARNING INTELLIGENCE IN NUCLEAR CRISIS MANAGMENT: AVOIDING CATASTROPHIC MISCALCULATION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ___________________________ Dr. Ronald K. Gaddie, Chair ___________________________ Dr. Colin M. Barry ___________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ___________________________ Dr. Jorge L. Mendoza ___________________________ Dr. Shad B. Satterthwaite © Copyright by CHRISTOPHER M. SARTORIUS 2018 All Rights Reserved. This dissertation is dedicated to my family and all intelligence professionals, military and civilian, past and present, who have dedicated their lives to protecting our great nation and our allies. Acknowledgements Working on this doctoral dissertation has been both a joy and a challenge. This work would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of countless individuals. At the most personal level, I would like to thank my wife, Fulvia, for her support over the past three years of this doctoral program and for her care and love over the past 25 years. I wish to thank my son, Konrad, for providing inspiration, much needed breaks in my work routine, and for sharing lunch together at the OU cafeteria followed by our fun table tennis matches. I also would like to thank my parents, Tim and Wanda Sartorius, for instilling in me the value of a great education. I would also like to thank Dr. Shad Satterthwaite, always friendly, open, and upbeat for enthusiastically encouraging me to pursue a doctoral degree at OU and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Robinson
    To: Bill Robinson <[email protected]> From: "Howard W. Hallman" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Canadian churches and abolition Cc: Bcc: X-Attachments: At 12:43 PM 11/16/98 -0500, Bill Robinson wrote: >Dear Howard - > >Project Ploughshares, which is a project of the Canadian Council of >Churches, is considering the feasibility of organizing some kind of >outreach project between Canadian church leaders and church leaders in >other countries on the subject of nuclear abolition.... December 1, 1998 Dear Bill, I've been hanging onto your communication of November 16 about getting the Canadian Council of Churches to reach out to other countries on nuclear abolition. Since my response is somewhat complex, I'm just getting around to replying. Basically it's a good idea. Because the Canadian government is questioning some of the cold war assumptions about nuclear deterrence and has led the way in land mines, it would be useful for Canadian religious bodies to provide similar world leadership within the religious community. As you may recall, I initiated an effort related to the 1998 session of the NPT Preparatory Committee in Geneva that (1) produced a statement to delegates from Dr. Konrad Raiser, general secretary of the World Council of Churches, and Godried Cardinal Danneels, president of Pax Christi International, (2) sponsored a reception for delegates co-hosted by Dr. Raiser and Cardinal Danneels, and (3) developed a presentation to delegates on spiritual and moral values. I'm sending separately the Raiser-Danneels statement with some endorsers. I can send you the presentation to delegates if you want it.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint U.S. Korea Academic Studies
    2012 2012 Joint ASIA AT A TIPPING POINT: KOREA, THE RISE OF CHINA, AND THE IMPACT OF LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS EDITOR-IN-CHIEF: GILBERT ROZMAN, PRINCETON UNIVERSITY Polical Change in 2010-2012 and Regional Sociological Processes and Regional Community JOINT Cooperaon Centered on the Korean Peninsula Formaon Incorporang South Korea U. S. Leadership Changes and South Korea’s China Policy South Korean Naonal Identy Gaps with -K U.S.KOREA Jae Ho Chung China and Japan Gilbert Rozman or North Korean Polics and China ea Academic Studie Jack Pritchard and L. Gordon Flake Diverging Trajectories of Trust in Northeast Asia: ACADEMIC South Korea’s Security Relaons with Japan and China Japanese Polics, the Korean Peninsula, and China Leif-Eric Easley Kazuhiko Togo STUDIES A Cognive Approach to Ethnic Identy Chinese Polics and the Korean Peninsula Construcon in the Korean Enclave in Beijing ASIA AT A TIPPING POINT: Gilbert Rozman Sharon Yoon KOREA, THE RISE OF CHINA, AND THE IMPACT OF Security Challenges and the Changing TPP or ASEAN+3: Alternave Plans for Asian Balance on the Korean Peninsula Regionalism and Free Trade Pacts LEADERSHIP TRANSITIONS s The View from China The U.S. Approach to Regional Trade Agreements EDITORSINSCHIEF: Andrew Scobell Involving East Asia GILBERT ROZMAN Edward J. Lincoln The View from Russia Stephen Blank South Korea: Which Way Will It Go on Asian Integraon? Hyung-Gon Jeong V Japan’s Response to Nuclear North Korea ol. 23 Narushige Michishita Compeng Templates in Asia Pacific Economic Integraon Peter A. Petri The View from
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Connections a Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations
    Comparative Connections A Quarterly E-Journal on East Asian Bilateral Relations US-Korea Relations: Smooth Sailing in the Wake of Cheonan Victor Cha, Georgetown University/CSIS Ellen Kim, CSIS The sinking of the Cheonan remained the predominant issue in the US-ROK relationship as both countries spent the quarter coordinating and undertaking punitive measures against North Korea for its alleged attack on the ship. The UN Security Council adopted a Presidential Statement condemning the attack but did not directly blame North Korea. The US and the ROK held their first “Two-plus-Two” meeting in Seoul where Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates met Foreign Minster Yu Myung-hwan and Minister of National Defense Kim Tae-young. While countries reopened their dialogue channels in the hope of resuming the Six-Party Talks, there remain many challenges and uncertainties that make the future direction of the Talks unclear. Several issues remain to be resolved on the KORUS FTA while negotiators are expected to hold a ministerial meeting soon to strike a deal. The Chicago Council on Global Affairs released a report on US attitudes toward South Korea that highlighted public support for trade agreements, including the KORUS FTA, is lukewarm. Among those who viewed fair trade as critical for US interests, support for KORUS was much stronger. Cheonan round 1: UN Presidential Statement Tension persisted from the beginning of this quarter as countries tried to reach agreement on the UN Security Council measure over the sinking of the Cheonan. While tireless wrangling and unyielding negotiations between the US and China continued over the language of the Presidential Statement to be issued, North Korea threatened to start a “death-defying war” if the statement condemned North Korea for the sinking of the Cheonan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Nunn-Lugar and Cooperative Threat Reduction
    CASE STUDY SERIES 3 The Origins of Nunn-Lugar and Cooperative Threat Reduction Paul I. Bernstein and Jason D. Wood Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction National Defense University DR. JOHN F. REICHART Director DR. W. SETH CARUS Deputy Director, Distinguished Research Fellow Since its inception in 1994, the Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD Center) has been at the forefront of research on the implications of weapons of mass destruction for U.S. security. Originally focusing on threats to the military, the WMD Center now also applies its expertise and body of research to the challenges of homeland security. The center’s mandate includes research, education, and outreach. Research focuses on understanding the security challenges posed by WMD and on fashioning effective responses thereto. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has designated the center as the focal point for WMD education in the joint professional military education system. Education programs, including its courses on countering WMD and consequence management, enhance awareness in the next generation of military and civilian leaders of the WMD threat as it relates to defense and homeland security policy, programs, technology, and operations. As a part of its broad outreach efforts, the WMD Center hosts annual symposia on key issues bringing together leaders and experts from the government and private sectors. Visit the center online at www.ndu.edu/WMDCenter/. Cover: Russian and Ukraine defense ministers and U.S. Defense Secretary William J. Perry plant sunflowers on site of dismantled missile silo in Pervomaysk, Ukraine, June 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Recap: May
    MONTHY RECAP: MAY DPRK NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONS May opened with optimistic statements from U.S. envoy to six-party talks Christopher Hill and his newly appointed counterpart from South Korea, Kim Sook, after meeting in Washington,. Hill stated that after the DPRK completes its requirements, “[the United States] will certainly complete ours.” A Washington spokesperson also reaffirmed at the beginning of May U.S. commitment to remove North Korea from its list of terrorism-sponsoring states, although at the end of the month, this had not yet occurred. In addition, South Korean Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan announced that the United States and North Korea were expected to set up government offices in their counterpart’s capital, however, there was no timeline mentioned or any confirmation on the status of such a plan by either U.S. or DPRK officials. On May 1, it was also reported that the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee had passed legislation that waives the Glenn Amendment, which restricts the Department of Energy’s funding regarding countries that have conducted a nuclear test. This will allow the energy department to “provide material, direct, and necessary assistance” to North Korea’s denuclearization activities. On the same day, the committee also passed a bill that would restrict the government’s ability to remove the North from the list of terrorist-sponsoring states, requiring, if approved by Congress, the Bush administration to “certify that the DPRK has provided a complete and correct declaration” of all its nuclear programs first. North Korea has announced that it would be willing to blow up the cooling tower at the Yongbyon nuclear facility within a day after Washington removes it from the terrorist-sponsor state list.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Risk Reduction: a Framework for Analysis
    NUCLEAR RISK REDUCTION A FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS Wilfred Wan ABOUT THE AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Wilfred Wan is a researcher at UNIDIR. He Support from UNIDIR core funders has published on topics such as nuclear provides the foundation for all of the proliferation, sanctions, and the global Institute’s activities. This research area of non-proliferation regime. Recently, he was the Weapons of Mass Destruction and the author of Nuclear Risk Reduction: The Other Strategic Weapons Programme is State of Ideas, published in 2019 by UNIDIR, supported by the Governments of Australia, as well as Regional Pathways to Nuclear Finland, Sweden, and Switzerland. Nonproliferation, published in 2018 by the University of Georgia Press. Wan was UNIDIR’s Renata Dwan, John Borrie, Pavel previously a Japan Society for the Podvig, Daniel Porras, James Revill, Promotion of Science–United Nations Augusta Cohen, and Roberta Abdanur all University (UNU) Postdoctoral Fellow with provided invaluable advice, support, and the UNU Centre for Policy Research. He assistance on this paper. The author would holds a PhD in political science from the also like to acknowledge in particular Lewis University of California, Irvine. Dunn and Ankit Panda for their inputs. ABOUT UNIDIR NOTE The United Nations Institute for The designations employed and the Disarmament Research (UNIDIR)—an presentation of the material in this autonomous institute within the United publication do not imply the expression of Nations—conducts research on any opinion whatsoever on the part of the disarmament and security. UNIDIR is based Secretariat of the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, the centre for concerning the legal status of any country, bilateral and multilateral disarmament and territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or non-proliferation negotiations, and home concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of the Conference on Disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • Kristine Stiles
    Concerning Consequences STUDIES IN ART, DESTRUCTION, AND TRAUMA Kristine Stiles The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London KRISTINE STILES is the France Family Professor of Art, Art Ftistory, and Visual Studies at Duke University. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2016 by Kristine Stiles All rights reserved. Published 2016. Printed in the United States of America 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 12345 ISBN-13: 978-0-226-77451-0 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-77453-4 (paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-226-30440-3 (e-book) DOL: 10.7208/chicago/9780226304403.001.0001 Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Stiles, Kristine, author. Concerning consequences : studies in art, destruction, and trauma / Kristine Stiles, pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-226-77451-0 (cloth : alkaline paper) — ISBN 978-0-226-77453-4 (paperback : alkaline paper) — ISBN 978-0-226-30440-3 (e-book) 1. An, Modern —20th century. 2. Psychic trauma in art. 3. Violence in art. I. Title. N6490.S767 2016 709.04075 —dc23 2015025618 © This paper meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO z39.48-1992 (Permanence of Paper). In conversation with Susan Swenson, Kim Jones explained that ihe drawing on the cover of this book depicts directional forces in "an X-man, dot-man war game." The rectangles represent tanks and fortresses, and the lines are for tank movement, combat, and containment: "They're symbols. They're erased to show movement. III draw a tank, or I'll draw an X, and erase it, then re-draw it in a different position...
    [Show full text]