Shooting the President

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shooting the President SHOOTING THE PRESIDENT: THE DEPICTION OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY ON FILM AND TELEVISION FROM JOHN F. KENNEDY TO JOSIAH BARTLET Submitted by Matthew David Barber, to the University of Exeter as a thesis for a degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English, September 2009. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. .................................... Abstract This thesis – Shooting the President: Screen Depictions of the American Presidency from John F. Kennedy to Josiah Bartlet – examines the depiction of the presidency in American film and television from 1960 until the present day. In this study I explore the relationships between the presidency and Hollywood, particularly in the context of genre structures. I examine the constructions of specific presidential mythologies based on the real presidencies of Kennedy, Nixon and Clinton and the construction of fictional presidencies in the television series The West Wing. In four sets of case studies, I will chart the changing significance of each president through different genres, looking particularly at how each presidential mythology is affected by the anxieties and fashions of the contemporary political and social world. I also examine the ways in which the appearance of presidentiality is created within each text by various means including set design, the choice of actor, the use of dialogue and the framing of particular characters. The aims of my thesis are to demonstrate how a telegenic style of politics formed during and after the Kennedy presidency can be seen to be both represented and enhanced in genre films and television series. I chart the relationship of this new mediated style of presidency through my case studies as it faces challenges such as Watergate, Clinton’s sex scandals and the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001. Finally, I aim to demonstrate through a close reading of the latter seasons of The West Wing how the American public can be seen to be prepared by its popular media for the success of the first black president, Barack Obama. Acknowledgements This thesis took eight years to complete. I began working on it the day before the World Trade Centre towers were attacked and destroyed in September 2001. George W. Bush had only just been elected, Clinton’s biography was three years away, the second season of The West Wing had just come to an end, and Barack Obama was in the middle of serving a second term in the Illinois Senate. Whilst I have been working on my PhD, I’ve got married, bought a house, bought a different house and acquired a rabbit. No one could focus on such a rapidly evolving subject as this without monumental support, advice and assistance. I’d like to thank my supervisor James Lyons for sticking with me despite a few unpromising false starts and for helping me to find focus and structure. Like mine, James’s life has changed dramatically over the last eight years so I’m particularly grateful for his commitment and professionalism. I’d like to thank my colleagues in the administrative department where I have worked part-time to fund the luxury of working on my thesis. In particular I thank Patrick Kennedy, Fiona Kugele, Elke Lackermeier and Neil Abel for not firing me, Claire Keyte, Sam Mather, Beth James and Tom Begbie for putting up with me as a co-secretary and Kendra Brown for supporting me during the last crucial years as a friend and as a boss. Finally I’d like to thank my parents and brother for their advice and patience, particularly my father for endless proofreading. And my wife Becky for sticking with me, for settling down with me, and, hopefully, helping me to know what to do with myself when I’ve finished. Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One – Kennedy 35 Chapter Two – Nixon 95 Chapter Three – Clinton 139 Chapter Four – The West Wing 202 Conclusion 255 Screenshots 272 Bibliography 294 Filmography 306 Introduction On 26 September 1960, a major shift occurred in the relationship between the presidency and the screen media as John F Kennedy and Richard Nixon met for the first ever televised presidential debate. The debate was significant in several respects. It was the first real demonstration of the style and media skills of Kennedy, especially compared with Nixon’s corresponding inadequacies: Rick Perlstein describes the implications of the debate on the public perceptions of Kennedy and Nixon as follows: Kennedy styled himself the very incarnation of youth: of action, of charisma, of passion, risk-taking, stylishness and idealism and even heedlessness. Nixon, so recently the fair-haired boy of postwar politics – only four years older than Kennedy! – had let himself become the race’s rumpled old man. At the ballot box it was almost a tie. On television, in retrospect, it looked as if John F. Kennedy had won in a landslide.1 Nixon refused make-up before appearing on television despite having recently spent time in hospital and as such, regardless of the policies and initiatives he was debating, appeared the less vital of the two candidates. By contrast Kennedy, recognising that on television his appearance was of equal, if not greater, importance than his debating skill to his success, used make-up. Before the debate, Kennedy was six points behind in the polls. His success on television paved the way to his (albeit narrow) victory over Nixon. As well as being a watershed moment in Kennedy’s popularity, the first presidential debate was also an important tipping point in the relationship between the medium of television and presidential politics. In historian Iwan Morgan’s words, ‘the first ever presidential debate on 26 September marked the coming of age of television in American politics.’2 The debate was not the first time the worlds of television and presidential politics had met, however. In 1952, Nixon famously appeared on television to defend himself against accusations of financial irregularities. This appearance was notorious in the ways he used his family life as emotional ballast to his speech. The 1960 debate, in contrast, is important in the way that it displays two different approaches to the presidency in competition with one another. Nixon favoured, as he did in 1952, an emotional, textual approach to the debate while Kennedy favoured an 1 approach focused on physical appearance. Stella Bruzzi suggests that the difference between Kennedy and Nixon’s approaches to the debate had a wider, historical impact on the perception of the presidency for decades after: The president’s image is an effective metaphor for the state of the presidency within public consciousness, and the Kennedy-Nixon binary that has come to dominate the representation of American political history exemplifies the essential opposition. Whereas Kennedy’s image symbolises cohesion and stability, Nixon’s more ambivalent image symbolises disunity and instability.3 The contest between Kennedy and Nixon highlights a major shift from the politician as a policy debater to the politician as screen icon, and, in the words of John Hellmann, ‘like a film star, Kennedy became a mirror image of the citizen’s desire, an idealized reflection.’4 The televised meeting between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960 was, therefore, a moment that defined a new set of priorities in the sphere of politics, a style of leadership that prioritises image and personality over policy and debate. As Bruzzi notes, the differences between Kennedy and Nixon had a far-reaching historical impact on the national perception of the presidency. Indeed, I argue that particular themes and tensions arising from the contrasts between the two candidates affect screen depictions of the presidency into the 1990s and beyond. The 1960 debate is important in the context of my thesis as it establishes a chronological starting point for a series of themes that recur throughout my analysis of the depictions of the presidency on screen. These themes include the tensions between the public and private worlds of the president, an increasing national desire for the exposure of the details of the presidency, the blurring of the aesthetics of Washington and Hollywood and the effects of fictional reproductions of the presidency on the reality of the political world. The debate and the Kennedy presidency that followed, were important moments that signalled the transition from an old to a new style of presidency. Since the Kennedy presidency, the physical appearance of the president has become an increasingly significant issue. In his analysis of the Kennedy presidential myth, John Hellmann assesses the Kennedy/Nixon debate: 2 How did Kennedy win the debate with Nixon? Again, commentators have agreed on the essential points. First, Kennedy addressed the audience, taking his central campaign theme to the viewer, while Nixon addressed Kennedy, responding “me too” to Kennedy’s central theme before rebutting Kennedy’s specific claims in standard debate fashion. Second, Kennedy simply looked better. He appeared crisp, confident, handsome, earnest and sincere, where Nixon appeared bland, worried, sallow, distracted, and untrustworthy.5 Hellmann’s analysis reveals the importance of the visual image in the success of the Kennedy presidency but also points towards the failure of Nixon in the same context. A frequently repeated comment concerning the 1960 debate is that while Kennedy won in polls taken of the television audience, those who heard the debate on the radio or later read the transcript judged Nixon the winner.6 This view highlights Kennedy’s greater success in managing his appearance, but is also suggestive of the difference between an old and new approach to the presidency.
Recommended publications
  • A Film by Chris Hegedus and D a Pennebaker
    a film by Chris Hegedus and D A Pennebaker 84 minutes, 2010 National Media Contact Julia Pacetti JMP Verdant Communications [email protected] (917) 584-7846 FIRST RUN FEATURES The Film Center Building, 630 Ninth Ave. #1213 New York, NY 10036 (212) 243-0600 Fax (212) 989-7649 Website: www.firstrunfeatures.com Email: [email protected] PRAISE FOR KINGS OF PASTRY “The film builds in interest and intrigue as it goes along…You’ll be surprised by how devastating the collapse of a chocolate tower can be.” –Mike Hale, The New York Times Critic’s Pick! “Alluring, irresistible…Everything these men make…looks so mouth-watering that no one should dare watch this film on even a half-empty stomach.” – Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times “As the helmers observe the mental, physical and emotional toll the competition exacts on the contestants and their families, the film becomes gripping, even for non-foodies…As their calm camera glides over the chefs' almost-too-beautiful-to-eat creations, viewers share their awe.” – Alissa Simon, Variety “How sweet it is!...Call it the ultimate sugar high.” – VA Musetto, The New York Post “Gripping” – Jay Weston, The Huffington Post “Chris Hegedus and D.A. Pennebaker turn to the highest levels of professional cooking in Kings of Pastry,” a short work whose drama plays like a higher-stakes version of popular cuisine-oriented reality TV shows.” – John DeFore, The Hollywood Reporter “A delectable new documentary…spellbinding demonstrations of pastry-making brilliance, high drama and even light moments of humor.” – Monica Eng, The Chicago Tribune “More substantial than any TV food show…the antidote to Gordon Ramsay.” – Andrea Gronvall, Chicago Reader “This doc is a demonstration that the basics, when done by masters, can be very tasty.” - Hank Sartin, Time Out Chicago “Chris Hegedus and D.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Celebration and Rescue: Mass Media Portrayals of Malala Yousafzai As Muslim Woman Activist
    Celebration and Rescue: Mass Media Portrayals of Malala Yousafzai as Muslim Woman Activist A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Wajeeha Ameen Choudhary in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2016 ii iii Dedication To Allah – my life is a culmination of prayers fulfilled iv Acknowledgements This dissertation would not have possible without the love and support of my parents Shoukat and Zaheera Choudhary, my husband Ahmad Malik, and my siblings Zaheer Choudhary, Aleem Choudhary, and Sumera Ahmad – all of whom weathered the many highs and lows of the thesis process. They are my shoulder to lean on and the first to share in the accomplishments they helped me achieve. My dissertation committee: Dr. Brent Luvaas and Dr. Ernest Hakanen for their continued support and feedback; Dr. Evelyn Alsultany for her direction and enthusiasm from many miles away; and Dr. Alison Novak for her encouragement and friendship. Finally, my advisor and committee chair Dr. Rachel R. Reynolds whose unfailing guidance and faith in my ability shaped me into the scholar I am today. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT ……………………..........................................................................................................vii 1. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW...………….……………………………………1 1.1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………...1 1.1.1 Brief Profile of Malala Yousafzai ……….………...…………...………………………………...4 1.2 Literature Review ………………………………………………………………………………….4 1.2.1 Visuality, Reading Visual
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Highlights
    EIGHTH ANNUAL EDITION November 9-16, 2017 “DOC NYC has quickly become one of the city’s grandest film events.” Spans downtown Hailed as Manhattan from “ambitious” IFC Center to 250+ SVA Theatre and films & events “selective but Cinepolis Chelsea eclectic” ARTISTIC DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Thom Powers programs for the Toronto Raphaela Neihausen & Powers run the weekly International Film Festival and hosts the series Stranger Than Fiction at IFC Center and podcast Pure Nonfiction. host WNYC’s “Documentary of the Week.” DOC NYC has welcomed over 50 sponsors through the years, most of which have returned for 3+ years. ACSIL Discovery Image Nation Abu Dhabi Participant Media Technicolor-Postworks NY Brooklyn Roasting Co. Docurama Impact Partners Peru Ministry of Tribeca Grand Hotel Tourism & Culture Chicago Media Project Essentia Water IndieWire VH1 & Logo Documentary Posteritati Films Chicken & Egg Pictures Goose Island JustFilms/Ford Foundation RADiUS Vulcan Cowan DeBaets Half Pops Abrahams & Sheppard Kickstarter The Screening Room Wheelhouse Creative Heineken CNN Films MTV Stoli The World Channel International City of New York Documentary Association NBCUniversal Archives SundanceNow The Yard Mayor’s Office for Doc Club Media & Entertainment Illy New York Magazine ZICO SVA Owl’s Brew DOCNYC.NET DOCNYCFEST Voted by Movie Maker Magazine as one of the top 5 coolest documentary film festivals in the world! DOC NYC 2016 FEATURED: 12k 200+ likes on Facebook 60k special guests visits DOCNYC.net 125k 92 reached by e-mail Largest premieres Documentary
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN J. ROSS–WILLIAM C. BLAKLEY LAW LIBRARY NEW ACQUISITIONS LIST: February 2009
    JOHN J. ROSS–WILLIAM C. BLAKLEY LAW LIBRARY NEW ACQUISITIONS LIST: February 2009 Annotations and citations (Law) -- Arizona. SHEPARD'S ARIZONA CITATIONS : EVERY STATE & FEDERAL CITATION. 5th ed. Colorado Springs, Colo. : LexisNexis, 2008. CORE. LOCATION = LAW CORE. KFA2459 .S53 2008 Online. LOCATION = LAW ONLINE ACCESS. Antitrust law -- European Union countries -- Congresses. EUROPEAN COMPETITION LAW ANNUAL 2007 : A REFORMED APPROACH TO ARTICLE 82 EC / EDITED BY CLAUS-DIETER EHLERMANN AND MEL MARQUIS. Oxford : Hart, 2008. KJE6456 .E88 2007. LOCATION = LAW FOREIGN & INTERNAT. Consolidation and merger of corporations -- Law and legislation -- United States. ACQUISITIONS UNDER THE HART-SCOTT-RODINO ANTITRUST IMPROVEMENTS ACT / STEPHEN M. AXINN ... [ET AL.]. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y. : Law Journal Press, c2008- KF1655 .A74 2008. LOCATION = LAW TREATISES. Consumer credit -- Law and legislation -- United States -- Popular works. THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION GUIDE TO CREDIT & BANKRUPTCY. 1st ed. New York : Random House Reference, c2006. KF1524.6 .A46 2006. LOCATION = LAW TREATISES. Construction industry -- Law and legislation -- Arizona. ARIZONA CONSTRUCTION LAW ANNOTATED : ARIZONA CONSTITUTION, STATUTES, AND REGULATIONS WITH ANNOTATIONS AND COMMENTARY. [Eagan, Minn.] : Thomson/West, c2008- KFA2469 .A75. LOCATION = LAW RESERVE. 1 Court administration -- United States. THE USE OF COURTROOMS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS : A REPORT TO THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON COURT ADMINISTRATION & CASE MANAGEMENT. Washington, DC : Federal Judicial Center, [2008] JU 13.2:C 83/9. LOCATION = LAW GOV DOCS STACKS. Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- United States. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION : LAW AND PRACTICE / CHARLES A. SULLIVAN, LAUREN M. WALTER. 4th ed. Austin : Wolters Kluwer Law & Business ; Frederick, MD : Aspen Pub., c2009. KF3464 .S84 2009. LOCATION = LAW TREATISES.
    [Show full text]
  • The W Illiam J. C Linton P Residential Center
    WILLIAM J. CLINTON PRESIDENTIAL CENTER A Walk with President Clinton www.clintonpresidentialcenter.org Audio tours narrated by CLINTON FOUNDATION Choctaw Station President Clinton can 501-370-8000 tel • 501-375-0512 fax be purchased for an www.clintonfoundation.org additional $3.00. CLINTON LIBRARY AND MUSEUM 501-374-4242 tel • 501-244-2883 fax www.clintonlibrary.gov BECOME A MEMBER! Monday to Saturday: 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. With your membership, you support the Center’s Sunday: 1:00 p.m.–5:00 p.m. dynamic educational programming, unique temporary Closed Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Day exhibits, compelling lectures, and much more. Benefits include: CLINTON MUSEUM STORE • Free admission to the Clinton Presidential Library 610 President Clinton Avenue • Little Rock, AR 72201 and all National Archives and Records Administration 501-748-0400 tel • 501-748-0417 fax Presidential Libraries www.clintonmuseumstore.com • Guest admission passes Monday to Saturday: 10:00 a.m.–5:30 p.m. • A discount at the Clinton Museum Store and Forty Two Sunday: 2:00 p.m.–5:30 p.m. • Invitations to special events Closed Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s Day Free shuttle to and from the Center Thank you for your generosity and on-going support. Please visit Visitor and Membership Services for more FORTY TWO, ON-SITE FULL-SERVICE RESTAURANT information or visit clintonpresidentialcenter.org. 501-537-0042 tel www.dineatfortytwo.com Monday to Friday: 11:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m. COFFEE BAR AT 42 Clinton Monday to Friday: 9:00 a.m –4:00 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • “Things Fall Apart” Guest: Jennifer Palmieri
    The West Wing Weekly 6.21: “Things Fall Apart” Guest: Jennifer Palmieri [Intro Music] HRISHI: You’re listening to the West Wing Weekly. I’m Hrishikesh Hirway. JOSH: And I’m Joshua Malina. HRISHI: Today we’re talking about episode 21 from season 6, it’s called “Things Fall Apart.” JOSH: This episode was written by Peter Noah and directed by Nelson McCormick. It first aired on March 30th 2005. HRISHI: I don’t believe we’ve heard the name Nelson McCormick before. Is that someone whose directed The West Wing before? JOSH: No, I think not. This is his first of what will turn out to be two episodes of The West Wing. He also directed an episode called “Transition.” Which we’ll get to. Oh we’ll get to it. HRISHI: Joining us later on this episode Jennifer Palmieri, Communications Director for the Hillary Clinton campaign and formerly for the Obama White House. JOSH: What do you think of this one? HRISHI: I, I like the plot of this episode. I think it’s interesting what happens with the convention and the nomination process, but the execution of it, I have issues with here and there. Really just a few moments here and there in the writing. JOSH: I think we will find ourselves in accord as I wrote down ‘Great bones, not enough meat’ HRISHI: Hey look at that. Yeah. That’s a good way of putting it. And before we jump into our discussion, here’s a synopsis from Warner Brothers. “The success of the impeccably organized Republican convention contrasts with the Democrats who look in disarray as the candidates continue to battle to be the Democratic Party Presidential nominee.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Forum Is Brought to You for Free and Open Access by the Journals at U.S
    Naval War College Review Volume 56 Article 1 Number 1 Winter 2003 President’s Forum Rodney P. Rempt Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Rempt, Rodney P. (2003) "President’s Forum," Naval War College Review: Vol. 56 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol56/iss1/1 This President's Forum is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rempt: President’s Forum Rear Admiral Rempt is a 1966 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy. Initial assignments included deploy- ments to Vietnam aboard USS Coontz (DLG 9) and USS Somers (DDG 34). He later commanded USS Antelope (PG 86), USS Callaghan (DDG 994), and USS Bunker Hill (CG 52). Among his shore assign- ments were the Naval Sea Systems Command as the ini- tial project officer for the Mark 41 Vertical Launch System; Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) staff as the Aegis Weapon System program coordinator; director of the Prospective Commanding Officer/Executive Officer Department, Surface Warfare Officers Schools Com- mand; and Director, Anti-Air Warfare Requirements Division (OP-75) on the CNO’s staff. Rear Admiral Rempt also served in the Ballistic Missile Defense Orga- nization, where he initiated development of Naval Theater Ballistic Missile Defense, continuing those ef- forts as Director, Theater Air Defense on the CNO’s staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Critiques / Bulworth / Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas / Feux D’Artifices / the Last Days of Disco / Le Septième Ciel / Wild Man Blues]
    Document generated on 09/27/2021 9:20 p.m. Ciné-Bulles Le cinéma d’auteur avant tout Critiques Bulworth Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas Feux d’artifices The Last Days of Disco le Septième Ciel Wild Man Blues Paul Beaucage, Charles-Stéphane Roy and Jean Beaulieu Volume 17, Number 2, Summer 1998 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/34365ac See table of contents Publisher(s) Association des cinémas parallèles du Québec ISSN 0820-8921 (print) 1923-3221 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Beaucage, P., Roy, C.-S. & Beaulieu, J. (1998). Review of [Critiques / Bulworth / Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas / Feux d’artifices / The Last Days of Disco / le Septième Ciel / Wild Man Blues]. Ciné-Bulles, 17(2), 48–56. Tous droits réservés © Association des cinémas parallèles du Québec, 1998 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Critiques BULWORTH de Jay Bulworth (Warren Beatty), un sénateur dé­ de Warren Beatty mocrate qui, las des mensonges et de la corruption politiques, décide d'avouer la vérité (si âpre soit- elle) à ses électeurs. À quoi doit-on attribuer sa sou­ par Paul Beaucage daine volte-face? Mystère.
    [Show full text]
  • Through FILMS 70 Years of European History Through Films Is a Product in Erasmus+ Project „70 Years of European History 1945-2015”
    through FILMS 70 years of European History through films is a product in Erasmus+ project „70 years of European History 1945-2015”. It was prepared by the teachers and students involved in the project – from: Greece, Czech Republic, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Turkey. It’ll be a teaching aid and the source of information about the recent European history. A DANGEROUS METHOD (2011) Director: David Cronenberg Writers: Christopher Hampton, Christopher Hampton Stars: Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley, Viggo Mortensen Country: UK | GE | Canada | CH Genres: Biography | Drama | Romance | Thriller Trailer In the early twentieth century, Zurich-based Carl Jung is a follower in the new theories of psychoanalysis of Vienna-based Sigmund Freud, who states that all psychological problems are rooted in sex. Jung uses those theories for the first time as part of his treatment of Sabina Spielrein, a young Russian woman bro- ught to his care. She is obviously troubled despite her assertions that she is not crazy. Jung is able to uncover the reasons for Sa- bina’s psychological problems, she who is an aspiring physician herself. In this latter role, Jung employs her to work in his own research, which often includes him and his wife Emma as test subjects. Jung is eventually able to meet Freud himself, they, ba- sed on their enthusiasm, who develop a friendship driven by the- ir lengthy philosophical discussions on psychoanalysis. Actions by Jung based on his discussions with another patient, a fellow psychoanalyst named Otto Gross, lead to fundamental chan- ges in Jung’s relationships with Freud, Sabina and Emma.
    [Show full text]
  • “President Bartlet Special” Guest: Martin Sheen [Ad Insert] [Intro Music] HRISHI: You’Re Listening to the West Wing Weekly
    The West Wing Weekly 4.00: “President Bartlet Special” Guest: Martin Sheen [ad insert] [Intro Music] HRISHI: You’re listening to The West Wing Weekly. My name is Hrishikesh Hirway. JOSH: And mine is Joshua Malina. This is a very special episode of Blossom, no, of The West Wing Weekly. We finally got to sit down with Martin Sheen and so we decided to celebrate. Let’s give him his own episode. The man deserves it. Hrishi and I were planning originally to pair our talk with Martin with our own conversation about the season opener “20 Hours in America” but then we decided to make an executive decision and give the president his own episode of the podcast. We hope you enjoy it. We think you will. HRISHI: Thank you so much for finding time to speak with us. MARTIN: I’m delighted. HRISHI: We actually have some gifts for you. MARTIN: You do? HRISHI: We do. Every president has a challenge coin and so we thought that President Bartlet deserves one too. MARTIN: Oh my…Thank you… HRISHI: [crosstalk] so here’s one. MARTIN: Look at that! Wow! Bartlet’s Army…ohh! Look at that…Do you know someone did a survey on the show for all of our seven years and do you know what the most frequent phrase was? “Hey.” ALL: [laughter] JOSH: That’s funny. That’s Sorkin’s legacy MARTIN: Exactly. How often do you remember saying it? I mean, did you ever do an episode where you didn’t say “hey” to somebody? JOSH: [crosstalk] That’s funny.
    [Show full text]
  • Филмð¾ð³ñ€Ð°Ñ„иÑ)​
    Dulé Hill Филм ÑÐ​ ¿Ð¸ÑÑ​ ŠÐº (ФилмографиÑ)​ Twenty Five https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/twenty-five-7857786/actors Full Disclosure https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/full-disclosure-5508031/actors Five Votes Down https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/five-votes-down-5456181/actors Two Cathedrals https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/two-cathedrals-8770451/actors The Crackpots and These https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-crackpots-and-these-women-7727929/actors Women Let Bartlet Be Bartlet https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/let-bartlet-be-bartlet-6532644/actors An Khe https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/an-khe-4750131/actors Manchester (Part I) https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/manchester-%28part-i%29-6747478/actors The Lame Duck Congress https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-lame-duck-congress-7745291/actors The Short List https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-short-list-7763978/actors The Warfare of Genghis https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-warfare-of-genghis-khan-7773548/actors Khan Ways and Means https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/ways-and-means-5810871/actors Memorial Day https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/memorial-day-6815397/actors On the Day Before https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/on-the-day-before-609025/actors The Drop-In https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/the-drop-in-5473760/actors Separation of Powers https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/separation-of-powers-5680809/actors Access https://bg.listvote.com/lists/film/movies/access-4672407/actors
    [Show full text]
  • West Wing Or Left Wing? the Pedagogy of Politics in the Masterly Series of the United States
    West Wing or Left Wing? The pedagogy of politics in the masterly series of the United States Vicent Partal . For seven seasons, American viewers have had the There are very few buildings in the world that arouse the chance to follow a series that showed, as fiction but curiosity, attention and interest generated by 1600 Penn- very meticulously, internal life at the summit of power sylvania Avenue in Washington. The White House is a key in the White House. Directed by Aaron Sorkin, The setting for world politics, one of the leading centres of intri- West Wing series has set trends. Never before had gue in any terrain, the most absolute seat of power. It must North American political life been portrayed with such be one of the few buildings that can be recognised the world meticulousness. The reactions of critics and the pu- over, one of the few houses that leaves no-one indifferent blic have been highly favourable towards this non- when they see it. Consequently it is, and must be, also a pri- humorous parody of the American presidency but vileged setting for fiction. It has all the right conditions. some right-wing groups have accused it of creating a The White House has been portrayed on many occasions "parallel reality" comparable with the country's real in film and on television. It is believed that Wilson, a film presidency, that of George Bush. from 1945 directed by Henry King, was the first to recons- truct life at the White House with detailed sets. Since then, a whole range of films and TV series have attempted to draw back a little the curtain that obscures the most secret area of the White House from the view of the public at large.
    [Show full text]