318 THE INDIAN MEDICAL GAZETTE [June, 1934
THE INCIDENCE OF CLONORCHIS survey of the subject that there are no endemic INFECTION IN INDIA* cases of clonorchis or opisthorchis infection anywhere in India or Burma, although they K. N. b.sc. d.t.m. (Cal. and By BAGCHI, m.u., (Cal.), are very common in China and Indo-China. Liv.), f.i.c. (Lond.) Manson-Bahr, on the other hand, while dealing Public Health Laboratories, Patna with the subject of clonorchiasis in his book, ' the The literature on the incidence of flukes in refers to Leger who is said to have found in 50 cent of the natives of the East- India is both meagre and conflicting. The only eggs per systematic investigation that has been made Coast of India', but Chandler did not find in connection with helminthic infections is by even a single case of clonorchis infection in Chandler (1928) who states in his detailed any of the provinces, although his investigation covered practically the whole of India includ- * the east coast. a few cases Read at the Indian Science Congress, Bombay, 1934. ing Only sporadic of fluke infections other than clonorchis were found in practically every province except Burma. Fasciolopsis buski is the one which was commonly met with and it was found almost in endemic form in some parts of Assam. McConnell (Castellani and Chalmers, 1919) reported two cases of opisthorchis infection among Indians in Calcutta and one of clonor- chis in a Chinese who apparently got the infec- tion in China, and hence this was not an indi- genous infection. Knowles (1923) reported a case of clonorchis infection in Assam, but Chandler believes that it was really a case of opisthorchis which is a very common parasite in cats and dogs in Calcutta and also in other parts ' of India, especially in eastern India. Besides, the clinical history of the case, as given by Knowles, is against the possibility of any such infection. Byam and Archibald mention that Acton found two cases of clonorchiasis in Mesopotamia among Indian soldiers. On refer- ring to the paper it is seen that Acton (1919) found ova of Clonorchis endemicus in two and ova of Heterophyes heterophyes in one out of about 3,000 Indian soldiers. As there is no reference in the paper to the condition of the patients in whose faeces the ova were found, it may be assumed that the clinical features of these cases were not in any way suggestive of clonorchiasis, otherwise they would have attracted the attention of a keen observer like Acton and found place in his paper. The eggs found in the stools were probably opisthorchis eggs. As clonorchis is very common in China, Japan and other Far Eastern countries, there is a like- lihood of cases occurring in Burma but Chandler failed to detect any. Manson in describing the geographical distribution of the liver flukes has mentioned India as one of the countries where it is found, but no genuine indigenous case, con- firmed either by finding the flukes or by clinical features, has so far been reported. In Bihar, only two cases of Fasciolopsis buski infection were found by Chandler in the districts of Singhbhum and Ranchi and by other obser- vers in Monghyr and Patna. The case I am reporting here appears to be one of Clonorchis sinensis infection and was found in Patna. The patient, a Muhammadan male, aged 23 years, consulted his doctor for treatment of anaemia, enlarged spleen and liver and occasional attacks INFECTION IN INDIA : BAGCHI 319 .Tune, 1934] CLONORCHIS with me in a permanent preparation made by me a few months ago in the Liverpool School
1 singara' plays also the same part in infecting men with clonorchis.
Summary The flukes that infect men are very rarely found in India. Chandler reported a few sporadic cases of F. buski infection in different provinces, but he did not find a single case of clonorchiasis anywhere in India or Burma, although it is very common in China, Japan, Korea and other Far Eastern countries. McConnell found clonorchis in a Chinese in Calcutta. Knowles reported the finding of the eggs of clonorchis in the faeces of a man in Assam, and Acton in two patients among the Indian soldiers in Mesopotamia, but no specific diagnosis was made, either "by finding the flukes or by clinical history. The case referred to in this paper is an indigenous one developing signs and symptoms suggestive of clonorchiasis, and typical ova were found in his fasces. The ova of clonorchis, heterophyes and opis- thorchis all look alike and it is very difficult to differentiate them under the microscope. In China, Japan and other eastern countries the practice of taking uncooked fish spreads infection in man. Certain water plants in China have also been found to harbour encysted cercarise. Chandler traced infection of F. buski ' ; to eating the common waternuts or singara (Trapa bicornis) in Eastern Bengal. It is probable that this waternut which is found all over India may be the source of infection in the sporadic cases of clonorchis and other fluke infections.
References Acton, H. W. (1919). Indian Journ. Med. Re*., Vol. VI, p. 601. Byam, W., and Archibald, R. G. (1923). The Prac- tice of Medicine in the Tropics. Vol. III. Henry Frowde, and Hodder and Stoughton, London. Castellani, A., and Chalmers, A. J. (1919). Manual of Tropical Medicine, p. 577. Third Edition. Bailliere, Tindall and Cox, London. Chandler, A. C. (1926). Indian Journ. Med. Res., Vol. XIV, p. 179. Chandler, A. C. (192G). Ibid., Vol. XIV, p. 481. Chandler, A. C. (1927). Ibid., Vol. XIV, p. 733. Chandler, A. C. (1928). Ibid., Vol. XV, p. 695. Knowles, R., Chopra, R. N., Gupta, J. C., and Das Gupta, B. M. (1923). Indian Med. Gaz., Vol. LVIII, p. 470. Manson-Bahr, P. H. (1929). Tropical Diseases. Cassell and Company, Ltd., London.
[Note.?The evidence that this is a case of clonorchis infection is not at all conclusive as it appears to have been based on the study of three eggs. Up to the present no case of endemic infection with this fluke has been definitely proved in India. The suggestion that sporadic infections of clonorchis may be transmitted, like Fasciolopsis buski, by cercarise encysted on the corm of Trapa bicornis is not in accord with the known life history of this parasite, as a second intermediate host (a fish), in which the cercarise encyst, is needed.? Editob, I. M. G.]