DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography BIBLIOGRAPHY Avü.¡ERy, Iddo 1975. The position of the demonstrative pronoun in Syriac. JNES 34(2): 123-127. BAR-AsI¡ER, Moshe 1988. I-e Syro-Palestinien - Etudes grammaticales. JA 276(l-2):27-59. BEN-ASHER, M. 1970. Diqduq hap-po'd ha-'a¡ami ba-Halakhot pesugot. Leíonenu 34(4): 2J78- 286 & 3s(1) 20-35. BAUER, Hans & Pontus LSANoER 1927. Gran¡natik des Biblísch-Aramöísch¿n. Halle: Max NiemeyerVerlag. Brn-H¡ryyttvt, 7*,'ev 1951, Han-nistarot ba-'aramit haq-qadmonit. ln:. EretzJsrael, Arcltaeolo- gical, Historical, and Geographical Studies I (Schwabe Volume): 135-139. Jerusalem. 1961.'Ibrit ve-'aramit; nosaþ Íomron'al pi te"tdot íe-bi-ktab ve-íeLal pe (fÏle Literary and Oral Tradition of Heb,¡ew and Aramaic amongst ttre Samaritans), III.1. Ierusalem: The Academy ofthe Hebrew l:nguage. 1967 . 'lbrit vc: aramit: nosaþ lomron 'al pi ae'udot íe-bí-ktab ve-íeJal pe (the Literary and O¡al Tradition of Hebrew and A¡amaic amongst the Samaritans), IlI.2. Jerusalem: The Acadøny ofthe Hebrew language. Bemqerr, Stephan Frank 1985. Objective PronominøI Suffixes in Ara¡naic. A dissertation pre- sented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfi Ims lntemalional. BEYER, Klaus 1984. Die Ara¡¡uiischen Texte vom Toten Meer. Eamt den Inschriften aw Paläs- tína, dcmTestament l¿vis aus der Kairo¿r Gcnisa, der Fasten¡olle und den alten tal- mtú.ischen Zitaten. Gõningen: Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht. Bleu, Joshua 1971. Hebrew Language, Biblical. Ettcyclopedia luàaicø, XVI: cc. 1568-1583. BoRtsov, A. Ja. 1969. þigrafiðeskie zametki. Epigrafíka Vostoka 19: 3-13. BoYAR[.¡, Daniel 1976a. 'lyyunim be-'aramit bablit l-cíonenu 4O(3-4): 172-177. 1976b. The loss of final consonants in Babylonian Jewish Aramaic (BJA). Afroasiatic Linguistics 3(5): 103-107. 1978. On the history of the Babylonian fewish Aramaic reading traditions: The reflexes of *a and *ã.,LVES 37(2)t l4l-lû. BRoCKELMANN, C, 1908-1913. Grund¡iss der vergleichendcn Gra¡tunatik der semitischen Sprachen,I-[. (Vol. I: 1908; Vol. lI: 1913.) Berlin: Verlag von Reuther & Reichard. 1962. Syrische Grarwøtik. 9th edition. Læipzig: Verlag Enzyklopãdie. CANTTNEAU, Jean 1935. Gratnmaire du palmyrénien épigraphiqu¿. Le Caire: L'lnstitut Français d' Archéologie Orientale. CooK, &lward Morgan 1986. Rewríting the Bible. The Text and Ianguage of the Pseudo- JonatlønTargum. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the rcquirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Near Eastem hnguages and Cultures, University of Califomia, Ios Angeles 1986. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Univcrsity Mic¡ofilms Inæmational. 1992. An Aramaic incantation bowl from Khafaje. BASOß 285: ?981. CRysrer-, David 1985. A Dictíonary of Linguistícs and Phonetics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. D¡Lunr.l, Gustaf 1905. Grammatik des jMisch-palöstinischen Ara¡näßch. I-eipzig: J. C. Hin- rich'sche Buchhandlung. DEcEl.l, Rainer 1969. Aharamöische Gramnntik der Inschrifien des 10.-8 Jh. v. Chr. (Abhand- lungen filr die Kunde des Mo¡genlandes, 38(3).) Wiesbaden: Komissionsverlag Franz Steiner GrnbH. 256 Bnuocmpnv D¡oN, Paul-Eugène 1974. La Langue de Ya'udi- Description et classement de I'ancien parler de Zencirli dans le cad¡e des langues sémitiques du nord-ouest The Corporation for the Publication of Academic Studies in Religion in Canada. DoDt, Amos 1983. Li-tçurot hap-pe'alim haJalulim be+argum 'Onqelos. Leionenu 47(34): 185-207. Dnuv¡ns, H. J. W. (ed.) 1972. Old-Syriac (Edesscan) Inscriptions. (Semitic Study Series, htrew Series, 3.) læiden: E. t. Brill. DRosr'ER, E. S. & R. MAcucH 1963. Á Mandaic Díctíonary. Oxford: Odo¡d University Press. Erus, thomas 1853. In I-ayard, Discoveries in the Rui¡u of Níneveh and Babylon:434-448. New York. EPSTEÍN, J. N. 192l-1922. Gloscs Babylo-Araméennes. Revue des études juivesT3 (1921): 27-581. 74 (1922)z 40-72. 196O. Diqduq 'aramit bablit. lerusalem: The Magnes Press. F¡.sseERc, Steven Ellis 1983. A Gra¡nmar of the Palestinian Targun Fragments from the Cairo Genizah. A thesis presented to the Department of Near Eastem l-anguages and Civili- zations in panial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Harvard University, C-ambridge, Massachusetts. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Micro- films Intemational. 1990. A Grarnnar of the Palestinian Targum Fragments from thc Cairo Genizah. (lleu'- vard Semitic Studies, 38.) Atlanta, Georgia: Scholars Press. [Revised and cxpanded version of the dissertation submitted to Harva¡d University = Fassbcrg 1983,1 FITZMYER, Joseph A. 1967. The Ara¡naic Inscriptions of Sefre. (Biblica et Orientali4 19.) Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute. 1979. A Wandering Ararnean. Collected Aramaic Essays. (Society of Biblical Literature, Monograph Series, 25.) Chico, Califomia: Scholars Press. FoLMER, M. L. 1995. The Aramaic Language in the Achaemenid Period, A Study in Linguistic Variation, (Oricntalia Lovaniensia Anal€cta, 6E.) I-euven: Uitgeverij Peeters en Depart- ment frsterse studies. Fl,ANcû, Fulño 1979. Five Aramaic incantation bowls from Tell Baruda (Choche). Mesopotania 13-14:233-249. FRIEDMAN, Shamma 1974. Salo5 he'arot bediqduq 'aramit bablit. T¿¡åirs 43: 58-69. CELLER, Markham l, ln6. Two incantation bowls inscribed in Syriac and Aramaic. ËSOáS 39Q):422427. 1980. Four Aramaic irrantation bowls. Gary Rendsburg, Ruth Adler, Milton Arfa & Nathan H. Winter (eds.),The Bible World. Essøys in Honor of Cyrus H. Gordon: 47-60. New York: KTAV Publishing House, tnc. & The Institute of Hebrew Culture and Fducation of New York Univenity. 1986. Eight incantation bowls. Orientalía Lovaniensia Periodica 17: l0l-116. 1997. More magic spells and formulae. 8SOáS 6U2):327-335. GtNsBERc, H. L. 1959. Notes on some Old Aramaic æxts.,//VES 18: 143-149. GotoMB, David M, 1985. Á Granmar of Targum Neofití. (Han'ard Semitic Monographs, 34.) Chico, Califomia: Scholars Press. GonooN, Cyrus H. 1934a. Aramaic magical bowls in the Istanbul and Baghdad Museums. Archiv Orientálni 6: 319-334. 1934b. An Aramaic exorcism. Archiv Orientálni & 466-474. 1937. Aramaic and Mandaic magical bowls. Arcåiv Orientólni 9: 84-106. 1939. The Aramaic incantation in cuneiform. Archiv für OrientJ'orschung 12: 105-l17. 1941. Aramaic incantation bowlg Orienml¡a l0 (N.S.): I ló-141, 272-284,339-360. 1951. Two magic bowls in Teheran. Orientalia 20 (N.S.): 30G315. BtsttooRApnv 257 GoRDoN, Cyrus H. 1978. Two Aramaic incantations. In: A. Tuttle (ed.), Biblical and Near Eastern Studies. Essays in honor of W. S. IaSor:231-244. Grand Rapids, Michigan. 1984. Magic bowls in ttre Moriah Collection. Orienalia 53(2):22O-241. GosHB.r-GorrsrEIN, M, H. 1978. The language of Targum Onqelos and the model of liærary diglossia in Aranraic. JNES 37(2')t 169-179. GREENFELD, Jonas C. 1969. The 'periphrastic imperative' in Aramaic and Hebrew. IEI 19: 199- 210. 1973. Notes on some Aramaic and Mandaic magic bowls. The .lournal of the Ancient Near Eastern Society of Columbía University 5 (The Gaster Fesschrift): 149-156. 1978. Aramaic and its dialects, Jewish languages: Theme and variations. In: HeÈert Paper (ed.), Proceedings of Regional Conferences of the Association for Jewish Studies: 29-43. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Association for Jewish Studies, G¡rnNrrI-o, Jonas C. & Joseph NlvrH 1985. Qamia' manda'i ba'al 'a¡ba' ha5ba'oL ln: Eretz- Israel, Archaeological, Historícal, and Geographical Studies l8 (Natman Avigad Volume): 97 -1O7, Jerusalem. Gnossrer¡, Bema¡d 1971. Bible translations. A¡rcicnt versions; A¡amaic: the Targumim. Encyclopedia J udaica, IV: cc. 841-85 l. HÄcc, Tomas 1993. Magic bowls inscribed with an Apostles-and-Disciples catalogue from the Ch¡istian settlement of Hambukol (Upper Nubia) . Orientalia 62($: 376-399. HAMILToN, Victor Paul 1971. Syriac Incantation Bowls. A dissertation pr€sented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Brandeis University, DeparEnent of Medi- terranean Studies, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms lntemational. HARvhn¡EN, Tapni1977. On the Vocalism of the Closed Unstressed Syllables in Hebrew. A Study Based on the Evidence Provided by the Transcríptions of St. ferone and Palestinian Punctuations. (Studia Orientalia 48.) Helsinki. 1978. A Syriac incantation bowl in the Finnish National Museum, Helsinki: A specimen of Eastern Aramaic 'Koiné." Sr¿di¿ Orientalia 5l:1. 1981. An Aramaic incantation bowl from Borsippa. Another specimen of Eastem Aramaic "Koiné." + Appendix: A crypognphic bowl æxt or an original fake. Srudia Orienølia 5l:,14. 19E3. Diglossia in Jewish Eastcm Aramaic. Studia Orientalía 55:.97-113. 1986. On vowel reduction in Hebrew. Orientalia Suecana33-35: 166-174. 1994. A Ka¡aite Bible transcription with indiscriminate counterpans of Tiberian qame¡ and þolam (MS. Firkovitsh II, Arab.-evr. l). In: Aron Doun (&\ Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the Internatíonøl Organization for MasoretÍc Studies (IOMS), Jerusalem, June 2I -22, 1993: 334O. Jerusalem: The World Union of Jewish Studies. 1995. Pagan incantat¡ons in Aramaic magic bowls. In: M. J. Geller, J. C. Grcenfield a¡rd M. P. Weitanan (eds.), Studia Aramaica. New Sources and New Approaclæs. Papers Delivered at the London Cot{erence of the Institute of lewish Studies, University Col- Iege London, 26th-28th June 1991. (Joumal of Semitic Studies, supplement 4): 53-60. Oxfo¡d: Oxford University Press. Huc, Volker 1993. Altara¡nilische Grammatík der Texe des 7. u¡td 6. lH.S V.CHR. (Heidel- berger Studien zum Alten Orient,4.) Heidelberg: Heidelberger Orientverlag. HUNTER, Erica C. D. 1995. Combat and conflict in incantation bowls: Studies on two Aramaic specimens from Nippur. In: M. J. Geller, J. C. Gre¿nfield & M. P. Weitzman (eds.), Studia Aranuica. New Soarccs and New Approaches. Papers Delivered at the Landon Conference of the Institute of Jewish Studies, Universiry College London,26th-28th lune /99.1. (Joumal of Semitic Studics, supplement 4): 6l-75. Oxford: Oxford Univenity Press. 1996. Incantation bowls: a Mesopotamiân phenomenon? Oríentalia 65(3)t 22U233. 258 Bnuoantpny HUNTER, Erica C. D. 1997. Terminology of Aramaic incantation texts. (A paper read at the l2th World Congress of Jewish Studies, Jerusalem, 5th August 1997.) ISBELL, Charles D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kefar Hebrew Phonics Puzzles
    HEBREW PHONICS PUZZLES “A” & “E” Vowels www.thekefar.com @thekefar The Kefar bit.ly/ KefarYouTube [email protected] 24 Cards Educator’s Guide Pronunciation Chart Hebrew Phonics Puzzles © 2018 by The Kefar. All rights reserved. www.thekefar.com HEBREW PHONICS PUZZLES Educator’s Guide Thank you for using The Kefar’s Hebrew Phonics Puzzles! These are great tools for helping learners strengthen their Hebrew spelling skills and increase their vocabularies. This Educator’s Guide will explain how to read Hebrew, and how to use these phonics puzzles with your learners. Reading Hebrew Hebrew is a Semitic language with a writing system in which every symbol (letter) represents a consonant. Vowels in Hebrew are made up of dots and dashes that are added underneath, above, or to the left of Hebrew letters. These vowels, called niqqud, help Hebrew students learn how to pronounce words. As learners become more familiar with the language, and their vocabularies increase, they are able to read words without niqqud, supplying the correct vowel sounds based on their knowledge of Hebrew. There are three vowel sounds in this Hebrew Phonics Puzzles packet: ;These vowels [ ָ ַ ] make the “ah” sound, as in father This vowel [ ֶ ] makes the “eh” sound, as in bed; and .This vowel [ ֵ ] makes the “ei” sound, as in weigh To read, blend the sound of each Hebrew letter with the vowel sound (in that order). Note that Hebrew is read and written from right to left. is pronounced “seifel” - Samech + ei vowel ֵס ֶפל Example 1: The word (sei) / Fey + eh vowel (feh) / Lamed (l) is pronounced “aleh” - Ayin + ah vowel ָע ֶלה Example 2: The word (ah) / Lamed + eh vowel (leh) / Hey (h) Hebrew Phonics Puzzles ©2018 by The Kefar.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Hebrew Diacritics Without a Dictionary
    ACL-IJCNLP 2021 Submission 2830. Confidential Review Copy. DO NOT DISTRIBUTE. 000 050 001 Restoring Hebrew Diacritics Without a Dictionary 051 002 052 003 053 004 054 005 Anonymous ACL-IJCNLP submission 055 006 056 007 057 008 058 009 059 010 060 011 Abstract 061 062 המטוס נחת ברכות! 012 (a) hamatos naxat ???? 013 We demonstrate that it is feasible to diacritize 063 ‘The plane landed (unspecified)’ 014 Hebrew script without any human-curated re- 064 הַמָּטוֹס Éחַת בְּר¯כּוּת! sources other than plain diacritized text. We 015 065 present NAKDIMON, a two-layer character- (b) hamatos naxat b-rakut 016 level LSTM, that performs on par with ‘The plane landed softly’ 066 017 067 הַמָּטוֹס Éחַת בְּר´כוֹת! much more complicated curation-dependent 018 systems, across a diverse array of modern He- 068 (c) hamatos naxat braxot brew sources. 019 ‘The plane landed congratulations’ 069 020 1 Introduction 070 021 Table 1: An example of an undotted Hebrew text (a) 071 022 The vast majority of modern Hebrew texts are writ- (written right to left) which can be interpreted in at least 072 023 ten in a letter-only version of the Hebrew script, two different ways (b,c), dotted and pronounced differ- 073 ently, but only (b) makes grammatical sense. 024 one which omits the diacritics present in the full di- 074 1 025 acritized, or dotted variant. Since most vowels are 075 encoded via diacritics, the pronunciation of words 026 dotted text. Obtaining such data is not trivial, even 076 in the text is left underspecified, and a considerable 027 given correct pronunciation: the standard Tiberian 077 mass of tokens becomes ambiguous.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebert & Hebemo: a Hebrew BERT Model and a Tool for Polarity
    HeBERT & HebEMO: a Hebrew BERT Model and a Tool for Polarity Analysis and Emotion Recognition Avihay Chriqui, Inbal Yahav Abstract Sentiment analysis of user-generated content (UGC) can provide valuable information across nu- merous domains, including marketing, psychology, and public health. Currently, there are very few Hebrew models for natural language processing in general, and for sentiment analysis in particu- lar; indeed, it is not straightforward to develop such models because Hebrew is a Morphologically Rich Language (MRL) with challenging characteristics. Moreover, the only available Hebrew sen- timent analysis model, based on a recurrent neural network, was developed for polarity analysis (classifying text as \positive", \negative", or neutral) and was not used for detection of finer- grained emotions (e.g., anger, fear, joy). To address these gaps, this paper introduces HeBERT and HebEMO. HeBERT is a Transformer-based model for modern Hebrew text, which relies on a BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations for Transformers) architecture. BERT has been shown to outperform alternative architectures in sentiment analysis, and is suggested to be partic- ularly appropriate for MRLs. Analyzing multiple BERT specifications, we find that while model complexity correlates with high performance on language tasks that aim to understand terms in a sentence, a more-parsimonious model better captures the sentiment of an entire sentence. Notably, regardless of the complexity of the BERT specification, our BERT-based language model outper- forms all existing Hebrew alternatives on all common language tasks. HebEMO is a tool that uses arXiv:2102.01909v3 [cs.CL] 25 Feb 2021 HeBERT to detect polarity and extract emotions from Hebrew UGC.
    [Show full text]
  • Codex Sangallensis 878 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Codex Sangallensis 878 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Codex Sangallensis 878 is a manuscript kept in the library of the Abbey of St. Gall, in Switzerland. It dates to the 9th century and probably originates in Fulda monastery, it contains mainly excerpts of grammatical texts, including the Ars minor and Ars maior of Aelius Donatus, the grammar of Priscian, the Etymologiae of Isidore of Sevilla and the grammar of Alcuin. Furthermore, it contains a presentation of the Greek alphabet, the Hebrew alphabet, the Anglo- Saxon runes and the Scandinavian Younger Futhark, the latter in the form of a short rune poem known as the Abecedarium Nordmannicum. Bischoff (1980) considers the manuscript a personal collection or brevarium of Walahfrid Strabo's, who from 827 was in Fulda as a student of Hrabanus Maurus, and from 838 was abbot of the Reichenau Abbey. Hrabanus himself is known to have been interested in runes, and he is credited with the treatise Hrabani Mauri abbatis fuldensis, de inventione linguarum ab Hebraea usque ad Theodiscam ("on the invention of languages, from Hebrew to German"), identifying the Hebrew and Germanic ("Theodish") languages with their respective alphabets. References • Bischoff, Bernhard (1980). Die südostdeutschen Schreibschulen und Bibliotheken in der Karolingerzeit, Wiesbaden. External links • Online scan Cod. Sang. 878 at www.e-codices.unifr.ch/en/csg/0878 Hebrew alphabet The Hebrew alphabet, known variously by scholars as the Jewish script, square script, block script, is an abjad script used in the writing of the Hebrew language. It is used in the writing of other Jewish languages, most notably Yiddish, Judaeo-Spanish, Judeo-Arabic.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter J in Hebrew
    Letter J In Hebrew Strange and gormless William never crayon his counterfeits! Is Lion always simplistic and abdominal when yaw some province very administratively and depravedly? Ironic Dante superscribe, his ecad lathed remit subjectively. How different fonts and written languages using letters of beginnings, j in hebrew letter can add numbers are possible Jonah, Jesse and Jesus. We where ask ourselves, how could failure have been called Jesus if this version of law Name did blink even bond two thousand years ago? The transliteration and faculty writing a Hebrew script make this similarity apparent. Before I started learning the Hebrew Braille system, I worried that game would sometimes we know what language I start reading in. Cn y ndrstnd nglsh wtht vwls? Islam; it was used by Jews, Arabic peoples and Christians long memories the existence of Islam. It is ever proposed a letter form of new password below the hebrew in. Halstead Real Estate adheres to them. Thus both kindness and berth are maintained in balance. But mostly then, business must oblige the niqqud symbols first. Hieroglyphic Hebrew history from which black had that origin. The end is never perfect the infant, but their beginning of court new. German and Scottish are Greek to shore, just make news by pronouncing a strong H sound. Transcribed from Hebrew, Jesus was Yeshua. We always provide only with Spanish Alphabet Letter, Greek Alphabet Letters, Korean Alphabet Letters, and Chinese Alphabet Letters just tell name but few. Online Georgian keyboard to type all text state the Georgian alphabet. This is over regular Greek translation of regular Hebrew Joshua.
    [Show full text]
  • Tre Hebrew Alphabet by Eeskel Shabath Thesis Presented to the School 07 Graduate Studies As Partial Fulfilment F
    001797 ROMAHIZATXON 0? TRE HEBREW ALPHABET BY EESKEL SHABATH THESIS PRESENTED TO THE SCHOOL 07 GRADUATE STUDIES AS PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE ; 1> Ei«i. *^%. yss^i .jm- 44ftRAftle£ ONIVERSIFY OF OTTAWA, CAMASA, 1973 l C; Keskel Shabath., Ottawa, 1973. UMI Number: EC56155 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI® UMI Microform EC56155 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis, written for the Library School of Ottawa University, seeks to apply to the world of Western linguistics and to the librarianship profession. The scholarly tradition which I hitherto sought to acquire in my Semitics and Middle-Eastern studies while in the Middle-East, has proven a basic and complex experience in adjustment and in learning. In this process — and specifically in this thesis — I have been fortunate to have the guidance and the discipline of Dr. George Gerych , LLD, MLS, professor at the Library School of Ottawa University whose high and very particular qualifications for such guidance it would be inappropriate for me to elaborate, except to acknowledge as thesis director.
    [Show full text]
  • Transliteration of Judeo-Arabic Texts Into Arabic Script Using Recurrent Neural Networks
    Transliteration of Judeo-Arabic Texts into Arabic Script Using Recurrent Neural Networks Ori Terner Kfir Bar Nachum Dershowitz School of Computer Science School of Computer Science School of Computer Science Tel Aviv University College of Management Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, Israel Academic Studies Ramat Aviv, Israel [email protected] Rishon LeZion, Israel [email protected] [email protected] Abstract We trained a model to automatically transliterate Judeo-Arabic texts into Arabic script, enabling Arabic readers to access those writings. We employ a recurrent neural network (RNN), com- bined with the connectionist temporal classification (CTC) loss to deal with unequal input/output lengths. This obligates adjustments in the training data to avoid input sequences that are shorter than their corresponding outputs. We also utilize a pretraining stage with a different loss function to improve network converge. Since only a single source of parallel text was available for train- ing, we take advantage of the possibility of generating data synthetically. We train a model that has the capability to memorize words in the output language, and that also utilizes context for dis- tinguishing ambiguities in the transliteration. We obtain an improvement over the baseline 9.5% character error, achieving 2% error with our best configuration. To measure the contribution of context to learning, we also tested word-shuffled data, for which the error rises to 2.5%. 1 Introduction Many great Jewish literary works of the Middle Ages were written in Judeo-Arabic, a Jewish dialect of the Arabic language family that adopts the Hebrew script as its writing system.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Play in Biblical Hebrew: an Eclectic Collection
    WORD PLAY IN BIBLICAL HEBREW: AN ECLECTIC COLLECTION Gary A. Rendsburg Cornell University Word play in the Bible takes a variety of forms. The present article pre­ sents an eclectic collection of examples of the phenomenon; taken together they serve to illustrate the various types of word play that may be found in the biblical text. More standard surveys of word play in the Bible may be found conveniently in the standard reference works. 1 Most of my examples will deal with the use of a single word bearing two meanings in the same context. But I also include cases of alliteration, an important feature of biblical rhetorical style,Z and it is with such an example that I begin my presentation. One does not have to read far in the Bible to encounter word play; indeed the opening words of the Bible present an example: bere)sit bara? "in the beginning of creating" (Gen 1:1). The author has con­ structed the story so that it begins with the same three letters b-r-) that form the root of the verb "create" so crucial to the story. 3 In a sense, this example from the opening words of the Bible sets the tenor for the Bible as a whole, for the biblical authors consistently opted 1. For general surveys, see]. M. Sasson, "Wordplay in the OT," IDBSup (Nash­ ville: Abingdon, 1976), pp. 968-70; and E. L. Greenstein, "Wordplay, Hebrew," ABD 6, pp. 968-71. 2. I am in the process of writing an extended work on the use of alliteration as a compositional factor in biblical literature, both prose and poetry.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM PROTO-HEBREW to MISHNAIC HEBREW: the HISTORY of '1- and Rt- 1 T T
    FROM PROTO-HEBREW TO MISHNAIC HEBREW: THE HISTORY OF '1- AND rt- 1 T T By RICHARD C. STEINER Yeshi1•a Uni1·ersity Ki::Jo 'T.VJK U'J£)l;i ,,;i it.VK 'JT.V n'::J 'T.VJK cii~i:in i~KJ Kl;ii cnJT.V~ :ii10J Kl;i :iJT.V~ ''l.'::Ji i1il.' 173.'£> 1P 1~K :im iio:i l;il,' CK ':::l . The men of the Second Temple who came before us, men of learning and masters of 111is/111ah - their 111is/111ah and ta/mud was always formulated in this way: 1~137 ,1~37!:> ,ip ,1~!(" (lbn Kapron, Ibn Daud, and Ibn Chiquitilla, I 870, p. 44). ONE OF THE IMPORTANT breakthroughs in the rediscovery of Mishnaic Hebrew was the demonstration by Ben-Hayyim (1954, p. 50) that the three major reading-traditions of Hebrew - the Tiberian, the Babylonian, and the Palestinian - agree in restricting the general (i.e. non-pausal) use of the 2ms pronominal suffix 1; to post-Biblical texts. This aspect of Ben-Hayyim's theory was further strengthened ten years later, when Yalon (1964, pp. 13-15) called attention to the tenth-century passage quoted above and many other interesting pieces of evidence. 1. It is a great pleasure to acknowledge the debt I owe to Professors Haim Blanc, Joshua Blau, Daniel Boyarin, Dietz Edzard, Edward Greenstein, Moshe Held, Robert Hetzron, Joseph Malone, Erica Reiner, and Malcah Yaeger for their valuable comments on an earlier, and very different, versionofthis article (originally prepared for the Fourth North American Conference on Afroasiatic Linguistics, March 14-15, 1976, Philadelphia) and/or their answers to questions about the issues raised here.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Medieval Hebrew Sibilants in the Rhineland, South Central and Eastern Europe*
    EARLY MEDIEVAL HEBREW SIBILANTS IN THE RHINELAND, SOUTH CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE* by ALICE FABER University of Florida ABSTRACT: It has been thirty years since it was first proposed that medieval French and German, while lacking [s] phones, each had two [s) phones, one with the tongue tip as the primary constrictor, generally transcribed [s], and one with the blade as the primary constrictor, [~]. While the distribution and development of these phones have been extensively stud­ ied, much of the study has proceeded in ignorance of the existence and value of contemporary Hebrew records from the Rhineland. Similarly, study of the Old Ashkenazic values of the Hebrew sibilants by Gumperz and others, while aware of the problem of the Old French and OHG/ MHG sibilants, overlooks some of the detailed phonetic inferences avail­ able for the European languages. This paper is an attempt to synthesize discussion of the European and Hebrew facts into a coherent whole, leading to the conclusion that all of the orthographic distinctions relating to sib­ ilants in biblical Hebrew were in fact maintained throughout the period of Jewish settlement in the Rhineland. Thus, the [s]/[s] contrast in most Ashkenazic Hebrew is a direct descendant of the same contrast in BH, not an innovation to bring the pronunciation into line with the Tiberian vocalization. *This paper is a slightly revised version of a paper read at !he l 98 l annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. I would like to thank all those whose comments on that presentation are incorporated here. Additional thanks are due to those individuals who helped me deal with the early Germanic and Slavic material.
    [Show full text]
  • Grammar Lessons for Aleph with Beth
    Grammar Lessons for Aleph with Beth Contents Contents Lesson 1 - First nouns and adjectives 1.1 Interrogative pronouns 1.2 The definite article 1.3 Adjectives Lesson 2 - Plural nouns and adjectives ’very‘ ְמא ֹד 2.1 2.2 Plural demonstrative ‘these’ 2.3 Plural forms 2.4 Irregular plurals Lesson 3 - Conjunction and gender ְו- The conjunction 3.1 3.2 Letters with two pronunciations 3.3 Gender and epicene nouns Lesson 4 - Subject Pronouns 4.1 Subject pronouns 4.2 Verbless clauses Lesson 5 - Family terms 5.1 Possessive pronoun suffixes 5.2 Construct forms 5.3 Letters with two pronunciations 5.4 Maqqef Lesson 6 - Prepositions and Location 6.1 Prepositions ִשׂים Imperative verb 6.2 marks definite direct objects ֶאת־ 6.3 Lesson 7 - Alphabet part 1 7.1 Consonants 7.2 Vowels 7.3 Definite article variants Lesson 8 - Parts of the Body 8.1 Dual forms 8.2 Nouns with plural form only 8.3 Nouns in construct form Lesson 9 - Things good and bad 9.1 Possessive suffixes review ָדּ ָבר The word 9.2 Draft copy: work in progress - Aleph with Beth - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. You are free to translate, adapt and redistribute as long as you credit the original source and release the adaptation under the same CC license. 2 9.3 Adjectives ‘good’ and ‘bad’ 9.4 The yes-no question marker prefix ִהנֵּה Hinneh 9.5 Lesson 10 - Alphabet part 2 10.1 Consonants 10.2 Vowels 10.3 Maqqef (review from 5.4) Lesson 11 - Construct Forms 11.1 Plural forms of son and daughter 11.2 Construct forms 11.3 Good or bad in the eyes of..
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Hebrew As a Second Or Foreign Language: Issues of Directionality, Orthography, and Metalinguistic Awareness
    HEBREW LANGUAGE EDUCATION LITERATURE REVIEWS Learning Hebrew as a Second or Foreign Language: Issues of Directionality, Orthography, and Metalinguistic Awareness November 2017 Chad Walker University of Southern California Preface CASJE (Consortium for Applied Studies in Jewish Education) is an evolving community of researchers, practitioners, and philanthropic leaders dedicated to improving the quality of knowledge that can be used to guide the work of Jewish Education. CASJE was launched with lead funding from the Jim Joseph, AVI CHAI, and Mandell and Madeleine Berman Foundations. Early on, CASJE stakeholders and partners identified the potential for research to contribute to the improvement of Hebrew language education. To date, CASJE’s activity in this field has included an effort to gain a better understanding of core issues that might benefit from a systematic applied research program, and on formulating a series of questions that might guide such a program over time. To that end, this literature review is the third and final in a series commissioned by the CASJE Board. These reviews explore the implications and applications to the teaching and learning of Hebrew of recent research in heritage, second and foreign language learning. Chad Walker, the author of this third review, is a Doctoral candidate in East Asian Languages and Cultures at the University of Southern California. Scott Goldberg, Associate Professor at Yeshiva University’s Azrieli Graduate School of Education, also contributed to this review. Michael Feuer Lee Shulman Co-Chair, CASJE Board Co-Chair, CASJE Board Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Part 1: The Unique Features of the Hebrew Writing System................................................ 7 Part 2: Comparing Hebrew with Other RTL and LTR Languages ......................................
    [Show full text]